Sobieszek G, Powrózek T, Mazurek M, Skwarek-Dziekanowska A, Małecka-Massalska T. Electrical and Hormonal Biomarkers in Cachectic Elderly Women with Chronic Heart Failure.
J Clin Med 2020;
9:E1021. [PMID:
32260434 PMCID:
PMC7230681 DOI:
10.3390/jcm9041021]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cachexia is an unfavorable metabolic syndrome causing involuntary weight loss followed by muscle wasting, which can lead to the exacerbation of chronic heart failure (CHF), and considerably increases mortality rate among CHF patients. Unfortunately, until now it has not been possible to determine factors that could improve clinical options for cachexia management or enable the identification of patients at risk of its development. We assessed how cachexia conditions in CHF reflect cardiac and laboratory parameters in comparison with non-cachectic patients.
METHODS
66 women were enrolled to the study group and underwent meticulous screening, according to recent clinical guidelines, in order to enable CHF and cachexia detection. Body composition was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and laboratory tests were supplemented by analysis of plasma circulating irisin.
RESULTS
A negative correlation between irisin concentration and both CRP and TNF-α was recorded (R = -0.362 and R = -0.243; p < 0.05). Irisin concentration positively correlated with EF% (R = 0.253; p = 0.046) and negatively with LVESd, LVEDd and NT-proBNP (R = -0.326, -0.272, and -0.320; p < 0.05). Both low levels of circulating irisin and Capacitance of membrane (Cm) were selected as unfavorable factors affecting cachexia in CHF patients (OR = 1.39 and 34.49; p < 0.05). Combination of Cm, irisin, CRP and albumin demonstrated sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 85.3% (AUC = 0.949) for distinguishing between cachectic and non-cachectic CHF patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Selected parameters reliably reflect cachectic conditions in CHF, and the proposed approach for cachexia based on the combined analysis of at least a few non-invasive markers could offer new opportunities for improving clinical outcomes in CHF patients.
Collapse