1
|
Svedman FC, Holmsten K, Jawdat F, Hailom W, Alm D, Grozman V, Ullén A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is beneficial for a subgroup of patients with urothelial cancer and solitary metastatic disease: a single institution real-world experience. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:74. [PMID: 38880908 PMCID: PMC11181669 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02465-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) include systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antibody-drug-conjugates, and targeted therapy. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) may be an intermediate state between localized and generalized cancer. The best treatment strategy for OMD and oligoprogressive (OPD) disease is poorly studied in mUC but local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could be an option to avoid or delay systemic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of SBRT given in a real-world patient population. METHODS All patients with mUC treated with SBRT at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2009 and 2022 were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment data, SBRT dosimetry data and treatment outcome were collected retrospectively. The study endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and feasibility of SBRT. RESULTS In total 39 patients were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 25.6 months. The LCR was 82%. PFS and OS were 4.1 and 26.2 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated; all patients but one (treatment related pain) completed the planned SBRT. Number of metastases irradiated with SBRT was significantly associated with outcome; patients with only one irradiated lesion had more favourable PFS compared to individuals with 2 or more metastases (HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.81-9.38, p = 0.001). A subgroup of patients (15%) achieved a sustained long-term survival benefit and never required systemic treatments after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was well tolerated and associated with high LCR. A subpopulation of patients with single metastatic lesion achieved long-term OS and never required subsequent systemic treatment after SBRT. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to discover treatment predictive biomarkers and to investigate the role of SBRT in oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Costa Svedman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
| | - Karin Holmsten
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Capio S:t Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Faith Jawdat
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Wehazit Hailom
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Daniel Alm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sia TY, Wan V, Finlan M, Zhou QC, Iasonos A, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Jewell E, Tew WP, O'Cearbhaill RE, Cohen S, Makker V, Liu YL, Friedman CF, Kyi C, Zamarin D, Gardner G. Procedural interventions for oligoprogression during treatment with immune checkpoint blockade in gynecologic malignancies: a case series. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:594-601. [PMID: 38296517 PMCID: PMC11108643 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of performing procedural interventions, defined as surgical resection, tumor ablation, or targeted radiation therapy, for oligoprogressive disease among patients with gynecologic malignancies who are treated with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS Patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade between January 2013 and October 2021 who underwent procedural interventions including surgical resection, interventional radiology ablation, or radiation therapy for oligoprogressive disease were identified. Procedures performed before immune checkpoint therapy initiation or ≥6 months after therapy completion were excluded. Long immunotherapy duration prior to intervention was defined as ≥6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated from procedure date until disease progression or death, respectively. RESULTS During the study period, 886 patients met inclusion criteria and received immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Of these, 34 patients underwent procedural interventions for oligoprogressive disease; 7 underwent surgical resection, 3 underwent interventional radiology ablation, and 24 underwent radiation therapy interventions. Primary disease sites included uterus (71%), ovary (24%), and cervix (6%). Sites of oligoprogression included abdomen/pelvis (26%), bone (21%), lung (18%), distant lymph node (18%), brain (9%), liver (6%), and vagina (3%). Most tumors (76%) did not exhibit microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency. Approximately half (53%) of the patients had long immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to intervention. Median progression-free survival following the procedure was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-9.9), and median overall survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 14.9-not estimable). Long versus short immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to procedure and length of immune checkpoint therapy had no effect on progression-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Procedural interventions for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint blockade therapy are feasible and demonstrate favorable outcomes. With expanding use of immune checkpoint therapy, it is important to investigate combined modalities to maximize therapeutic benefit for patients with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Sia
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivian Wan
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Michael Finlan
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qin C Zhou
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Epidemiology-Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth Jewell
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - William P Tew
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Seth Cohen
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chrisann Kyi
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dmitriy Zamarin
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ginger Gardner
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu C, Hsieh K, Cherry DR, Nehlsen AD, Resende Salgado L, Lazarev S, Sindhu KK. Immune Escape in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms of Action and Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and CAR T-Cell Therapy. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:1528. [PMID: 38132354 PMCID: PMC10741174 DOI: 10.3390/biology12121528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain cancer in adults, is characterized by a poor prognosis and resistance to standard treatments. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of several cancers in recent years but has failed to demonstrate benefit in patients with glioblastoma. Understanding the mechanisms by which glioblastoma exerts tumor-mediated immune suppression in both the tumor microenvironment and the systemic immune landscape is a critical step towards developing effective immunotherapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of immune escape mechanisms in glioblastoma that compromise the efficacy of immunotherapies, with an emphasis on immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. In parallel, we review data from preclinical studies that have identified additional therapeutic targets that may enhance overall treatment efficacy in glioblastoma when administered alongside existing immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kunal K. Sindhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (C.Y.); (D.R.C.); (A.D.N.); (L.R.S.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oligoprogression of Solid Tumors on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Impact of Local Ablative Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102481. [PMID: 36289743 PMCID: PMC9599608 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The breakthrough of a limited number of clones while on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), known as oligoprogression, has been previously described. The benefit of ablative radiation therapy (RT) directed at these clones, as opposed to changing systemic therapy, is unclear. We analyzed 30 patients with advanced solid tumors, the majority of whom (23/30, 86.7%) had either hepatocellular or urothelial carcinoma, who experienced oligoprogression on ICIs and were referred for RT. In this study, oligoprogression was defined as having experienced progression at three or fewer metastatic sites outside of the brain after achieving at least stable disease on ICIs for a minimum of three months. The median time to oligoprogression was 11.1 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. 24 patients had one oligoprogressive lesion and six had two. The median radiation dose delivered was 4650 cGy in a median of five fractions. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after RT was 7.1 months, and the time to oligoprogression was not a significant predictor of PFS2. 26 patients continued on ICIs after RT. While 17 patients subsequently progressed, 15 did so at three or fewer metastatic sites and could have theoretically stood to benefit from an additional course of salvage RT to further extend the lifespan of their ICIs. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100.0%, 96.3%, and 82.8%, respectively. These results suggest that RT may provide a PFS benefit and extend the lifespan of ICIs in patients who experience oligoprogression. Regardless of PFS, however, overall survival in this population appears to be excellent.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kispál M, Jánváry LZ, Balatoni T, Gábor S, Fedorcsák I, Katalin B, Kenessey I, Liszkay G. The Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Melanoma, A Retrospective Single Institute Preliminary Study of 30 Patients. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610550. [PMID: 36157171 PMCID: PMC9492835 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is the third most common type of skin cancer in the world. The incidence of melanoma is increasing in most countries, however, mortality seems to be slowly decreasing. The treatment of advanced cutaneous melanoma changed radically since 2011. The new therapeutic modalities, such as immuno- and targeted therapies give a chance to successfully reach more prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Despite the great therapeutic benefit, most patients eventually develop resistance to these therapies, and the disease will progress. In some cases oligoprogression develops. In those cases local therapy, such as stereotactic radiotherapy can make it possible to continue the previously applied effective medical treatment for the benefit of patients. In our study of a total of 30 patients-20 of them received pre-treatment with systemic medical therapy-received stereotactic radiotherapy using various systems, in the National Institute of Oncology, Hungary, Budapest. We managed to prolong the systemic therapy for 12.5 months median period with the assistance of CyberKnife technique. Therapy related adverse events were mostly tolerable with only 3% of Grade 3 toxicity. We concluded that stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, are safe, and effective therapeutic modalities for regional tumor control in cases of oligoprogression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihály Kispál
- Department of Dermato-Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Levente Zsolt Jánváry
- Department of Radiotherapy Centre, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tímea Balatoni
- Department of Dermato-Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Stelczer Gábor
- Department of Radiotherapy Centre, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Imre Fedorcsák
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bőcs Katalin
- Department of Radiology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Kenessey
- National Cancer Registry, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gabriella Liszkay
- Department of Dermato-Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De B, Venkatesan AM, Msaouel P, Ghia AJ, Li J, Yeboa DN, Nguyen QN, Bishop AJ, Jonasch E, Shah AY, Campbell MT, Wang J, Zurita-Saavedra AJ, Karam JA, Wood CG, Matin SF, Tannir NM, Tang C. Definitive radiotherapy for extracranial oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma as a strategy to defer systemic therapy escalation. BJU Int 2021; 129:610-620. [PMID: 34228889 PMCID: PMC10097479 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study whether delivering definitive radiotherapy (RT) to sites of oligoprogression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) enabled deferral of systemic therapy (ST) changes without compromising disease control or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified patients with mRCC who received RT to three or fewer sites of extracranial progressive disease between 2014 and 2019 at a large tertiary cancer centre. Inclusion criteria were: (1) controlled disease for ≥3 months before oligoprogression, (2) all oligoprogression sites treated with a biologically effective dose of ≥100 Gy, and (3) availability of follow-up imaging. Time-to-event end-points were calculated from the start of RT. RESULTS A total of 72 patients were identified (median follow-up 22 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19-32 months), with oligoprogressive lesions in lung/mediastinum (n = 35), spine (n = 30), and non-spine bone (n = 5). The most common systemic therapies before oligoprogression were none (n = 33), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 23), and immunotherapy (n = 13). At 1 year, the local control rate was 96% (95% CI 87-99%); progression-free survival (PFS), 52% (95% CI 40-63%); and overall survival, 91% (95% CI 82-96%). At oligoprogression, ST was escalated (n = 16), maintained (n = 49), or discontinued (n = 7), with corresponding median (95% CI) PFS intervals of 19.7 (8.2-27.2) months, 10.1 (6.9-13.2) months, and 9.8 (2.4-28.9) months, respectively. Of the 49 patients maintained on the same ST at oligoprogression, 21 did not subsequently have ST escalation. CONCLUSION Patients with oligoprogressive mRCC treated with RT had comparable PFS regardless of ST strategy, suggesting that RT may be a viable approach for delaying ST escalation. Randomised controlled trials comparing treatment of oligoprogression with RT vs ST alone are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita-Saavedra
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loi M, Alifano M, Scorsetti M, Nuyttens JJ, Livi L. Judging a Fish by Its Ability to Climb a Tree? A Call for Novel Endpoints in the Appraisal of Ablative Local Treatments of Oligometastatic Cancer. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1085-e1086. [PMID: 33686724 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Loi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Alifano
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Cochin Hospital, APHP Centre and INSERM U1138 Team "Cancer, Immune Control, and Escape", Cordeliers Research Center, Paris-Decartes University, Paris, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|