1
|
Puente J, Pinto A, Mendez-Vidal MJ, García Del Muro X, Maroto P, Vazquez S, Luque-Caro R, Anido U, Strunz-McKendry T, Upadhyay A, Montes J, Ortiz Nuñez A, González Portela J, Castellano D. Real-world treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and health care resource utilization for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03734-8. [PMID: 39365365 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03734-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Real-world evidence on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) management in Spain is limited. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in this population. METHODS/PATIENTS This retrospective observational study included all adults with a first diagnosis/record of la/mUC (index date) from January 2015 to June 2020 at nine university hospitals in Spain. Data were collected up to December 31, 2020 (end of study), death, or loss to follow-up. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from index date (Kaplan-Meier estimates), and disease-specific HCRU were described. RESULTS Among 829 patients, median age at diagnosis was 71 years; 70.2% had ≥ 1 comorbidity, and 52.5% were eligible for cisplatin. Median follow-up was 12.7 months. Most (84.7%) patients received first-line systemic treatment; of these, 46.9% (n = 329) received second-line and 16.6% (n = 116) received third-line therapy. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment in all lines of therapy, followed by programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors. Median (95% confidence interval) OS and PFS were 18.8 (17.5-21.5) and 9.9 (8.9-10.5) months, respectively. Most patients required ≥ 1 outpatient visit (71.8%), inpatient admission (56.6%), or emergency department visit (56.5%). CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic patterns were consistent with Spanish guideline recommendations. Chemotherapy had a role in first-line treatment of la/mUC in Spain during the study period. However, the disease burden remains high, and new first-line treatments recommended in the latest European guidelines should be made available to patients in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Puente
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Calle del Prof Martín Lagos, S/N, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria José Mendez-Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC) Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Pablo Maroto
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergio Vazquez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
| | - Raquel Luque-Caro
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Urbano Anido
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario de Santiago, Santiago, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang T, Tan A, Shah AY, Iyer G, Morris V, Michaud S, Sridhar SS. Reevaluating the role of platinum-based chemotherapy in the evolving treatment landscape for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Oncologist 2024:oyae215. [PMID: 39167703 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) for decades, based on the proven efficacy and established safety profiles of cisplatin- and carboplatin-based regimens. With the emergence of novel regimens, it is important to reevaluate and contextualize the role of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab 1L maintenance in patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy was established as a standard 1L regimen based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial. More recently, the EV-302 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy, and the Checkmate 901 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. These 2 regimens have now been included as standard 1L options in treatment guidelines for advanced UC. EV + pembrolizumab is now the preferred 1L treatment, and in locations where EV + pembrolizumab is not available or individual patients are not considered suitable, recommended options are platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance or nivolumab + cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for advanced UC recommended in guidelines, practical considerations with platinum-based chemotherapy, the role of avelumab 1L maintenance, recent phase III trials of EV + pembrolizumab and nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine, safety profiles of recommended 1L treatments, and second-line treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Alan Tan
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Valerie Morris
- EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - Sébastien Michaud
- EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, United States, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Dwyer R, Musat MG, Gulas I, Hubscher E, Moradian H, Guenther S, Kearney M, Sridhar SS. Split-Dose Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102176. [PMID: 39260094 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is a highly active and commonly used regimen in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). With GC, cisplatin is dosed at 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle; however, for many patients, impaired renal or cardiac function, neuropathy, or poor performance status (PS) can preclude the use of cisplatin. A promising alternative is split-dose GC, in which the cisplatin dose is divided over 2 days. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) to better understand treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness and safety of split-dose GC vs gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCa), GC, and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC). RESULTS Among 120 identified studies, 16 studies representing 1,767 patients included split-dose GC. Common reasons for choosing split-dose GC were impaired renal function, age > 70 years, comorbidities, and physician preference. Split-dose GC had objective response rates (ORRs) of 39%-80%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.5-9.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 8.5-18.1 months. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5%-38%. In the NMA, ORR with split-dose GC was significantly higher than with GCa. PFS and OS for split-dose GC were similar to that observed with the other regimens (GCa, GC, and MVAC). CONCLUSIONS This is the first SLR and NMA of split-dose GC in la/mUC. Despite heterogeneity in the limited studies included, split-dose GC demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profile to those seen with other regimens. Split-dose GC thus has the potential to extend the la/mUC population eligible to receive cisplatin-based regimens and warrants further prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard O'Dwyer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mihaela G Musat
- Evidence, Value and Access, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Ioana Gulas
- Evidence, Value and Access, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hubscher
- Evidence, Value and Access, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Hoora Moradian
- Evidence, Value and Access, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Silke Guenther
- Global Value Demonstration, Market Access & Pricing, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Mairead Kearney
- Global Value Demonstration, Market Access & Pricing, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathew Thomas V, Jo Y, Tripathi N, Roy S, Chigarira B, Narang A, Gebrael G, Hage Chehade C, Sayegh N, Galarza Fortuna G, Ji R, Campbell P, Li H, Agarwal N, Gupta S, Swami U. Treatment Patterns and Attrition With Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e249417. [PMID: 38696168 PMCID: PMC11066705 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The treatment paradigm for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has undergone substantial transformation due to the introduction of effective, novel therapeutic agents. However, outcomes remain poor, and little is known about current treatment approaches and attrition rates for patients with aUC. Objectives To delineate evolving treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with aUC using a US-based patient-level sample. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the nationwide deidentified electronic health record database Flatiron Health, originating from approximately 280 oncology clinics across the US. Patients included in the analysis received treatment for metastatic or local aUC at a participating site from January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2023. Patients receiving treatment for 2 or more different types of cancer or participating in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the (1) treatment received in each line (cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-based regimens, programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1] inhibitors, single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib, sacituzumab govitecan, or others) and (2) attrition of patients with each line of therapy, defined as the percentage of patients not progressing to the next line. Results Of the 12 157 patients within the dataset, 7260 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (5364 [73.9%] men; median age at the start of first-line treatment, 73 [IQR, 66-80] years). All patients commenced first-line treatment; of these, only 2714 (37.4%) progressed to receive second-line treatment, and 857 (11.8%) advanced to third-line treatment. The primary regimens used as first-line treatment contained carboplatin (2241 [30.9%]), followed by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (2174 [29.9%]). The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors emerged as the predominant choice in the second- and third-line (1412 of 2714 [52.0%] and 258 of 857 [30.1%], respectively) treatments. From 2019 onward, novel therapeutic agents were increasingly used in second- and third-line treatments, including enfortumab vedotin (219 of 2714 [8.1%] and 159 of 857 [18.6%], respectively), erdafitinib (39 of 2714 [1.4%] and 28 of 857 [3.3%], respectively), and sacituzumab govitecan (14 of 2714 [0.5%] and 34 of 857 [4.0%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that approximately two-thirds of patients with aUC did not receive second-line treatment. Most first-line treatments do not include cisplatin-based regimens and instead incorporate carboplatin- or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data warrant the provision of more effective and tolerable first-line treatments for patients with aUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Mathew Thomas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Yeonjung Jo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Beverly Chigarira
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Arshit Narang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Georges Gebrael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Chadi Hage Chehade
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Nicolas Sayegh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Gliceida Galarza Fortuna
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Richard Ji
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Patrick Campbell
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Haoran Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Sumati Gupta
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones RJ, Crabb SJ, Linch M, Birtle AJ, McGrane J, Enting D, Stevenson R, Liu K, Kularatne B, Hussain SA. Systemic anticancer therapy for urothelial carcinoma: UK oncologists' perspective. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:897-907. [PMID: 38191608 PMCID: PMC10951251 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02543-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common cancer associated with a poor prognosis in patients with advanced disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy has remained the cornerstone of systemic anticancer treatment for many years, and recent developments in the treatment landscape have improved outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of systemic treatment for UC, including clinical data supporting the current standard of care at each point in the treatment pathway and author interpretations from a UK perspective. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended for eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and is preferable to adjuvant treatment. For first-line treatment of advanced UC, platinum-eligible patients should receive cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by avelumab maintenance in those without disease progression. Among patients unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is an option for those with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumours. Second-line or later treatment options depend on prior treatment, and enfortumab vedotin is preferred after prior ICI and chemotherapy, although availability varies between countries. Additional options include rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy, an ICI, or non-platinum-based chemotherapy. Areas of uncertainty include the optimal number of first-line chemotherapy cycles for advanced UC and the value of PD-L1 testing for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Jones
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Simon J Crabb
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark Linch
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alison J Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- University of Central Lancashire, Lancaster, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Kin Liu
- Merck Serono Ltd., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Feltham, UK
| | | | - Syed A Hussain
- University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Bueno AP, Clark O, Turnure M, Moreira ES, Yuasa A, Sugiyama S, Kirker M, Li S, Hou N, Chang J, Kearney M, Kanas G. Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact ® survey 2020. Future Oncol 2024; 20:603-611. [PMID: 38214131 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. Methods: 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact® survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. Results: Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). Conclusion: In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula A Bueno
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, Av. das Nações Unidas 14171 15º andar, Morumbi São Paulo/SP CEP, 04794-000, Brazil
| | - Otavio Clark
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| | - Matthew Turnure
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| | - Eloisa S Moreira
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, Av. das Nações Unidas 14171 15º andar, Morumbi São Paulo/SP CEP, 04794-000, Brazil
| | - Akira Yuasa
- Pfizer Japan Inc, 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sugiyama
- Pfizer Japan Inc, 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | | | - Si Li
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Ningqi Hou
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jane Chang
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Mairead Kearney
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250 Darmstadt, 64293, Germany
| | - Gena Kanas
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maráz A, Nagy B, Macher T, Jeskó J, Tischler E, Csongvai C, Kearney M. Nationwide Study of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Hungary. Adv Ther 2023; 40:5475-5488. [PMID: 37831384 PMCID: PMC10611888 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02694-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data describing real-world treatment patterns in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Central-Eastern Europe are scarce, and data from Hungary have not been published. This retrospective, nationwide, real-world study investigated patient characteristics, treatment patterns, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes in patients with mUC in Hungary. METHODS Adults diagnosed with mUC from January 2016 through June 2021 were identified using the National Health Insurance Fund Administration database. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In total, 2523 patients with mUC were identified. Median follow-up was 7.1 months. Overall, 50% of patients received an identified systemic anticancer treatment; within this subgroup, first-line treatment was platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in 86%, non-PBC in 8%, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in 6%. The proportion of patients receiving treatment increased from 41% in 2016 to 59% in 2020, driven by increased use of first-line PBC or first-line ICI treatment. Comorbidities were more common in patients receiving first-line ICI treatment vs PBC or non-PBC and in patients receiving carboplatin + gemcitabine vs cisplatin + gemcitabine. Overall, only 24% received a second-line treatment. Unadjusted median OS from the start of first-line treatment in the PBC, non-PBC, and ICI subgroups was 12.8, 7.5, and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS from date of diagnosis in untreated patients was 7.8 months. OS comparisons adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups could not be performed. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess treatment patterns in patients with mUC in clinical practice in Hungary, using the national health insurance database. Rates of first- and second-line treatment were consistent with those observed in other countries. Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment became available for reimbursement in Hungary in late 2022, after the study period. Given the evolving landscape of reimbursed treatments in Hungary, further analyses are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anikó Maráz
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Korányi Fasor 12, H-6720, Szeged, Hungary.
| | - Bence Nagy
- Healthware Consulting Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Erika Tischler
- Merck Kft., Budapest, Hungary, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Csaba Csongvai
- Merck Kft., Budapest, Hungary, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Mairead Kearney
- Global Value Demonstration, Market Access and Pricing (GVAP), the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Møller CT, Tafjord G, Blindheim A, Berge V, Fosså S, Andreassen BK. Initial management and survival of patients with primary metastatic bladder cancer before the immunotherapy era: a population-based study from Norway. Scand J Urol 2023; 58:101-108. [PMID: 37953521 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v58.5923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Before immunotherapy became part of the management of metastatic bladder cancer (mBC), systemic anti-cancer treatment comprised primarily of platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics, the initial management, overall survival (OS) and hospitalisations of patients with mBC before 2018 when immunotherapy for mBC was introduced in Norway. Material and methods: It is a nationwide population-based study of primary mBC patients (diagnosed 2008-16). Descriptive statistics were applied and stratified for four initial management options (≤150 days after BC diagnosis): chemotherapy, major local treatment (cystectomy/pelvic radiotherapy), multimodal treatment (chemotherapy and local) and no anti-cancer treatment beyond transurethral resection of bladder tumour (untreated). Group differences were evaluated by Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis test; OS was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Results: Of the 305 patients included, 76 (25%) patients had chemotherapy, 46 (15%) patients had major local treatment, 21 (7%) patients had multimodal treatment and 162 (53%) patients were untreated. Median OS ranged from 2.3 months (untreated) to 9.8 months (chemotherapy). Patients who received treatment had a higher rate of hospitalisation, with a median stay of three to four times that of untreated patients. Conclusion: Before immunotherapy, more than 50% of patients with primary mBC did not receive any initial anti-cancer therapy and had a poor survival. Patients treated with chemotherapy had inferior median OS compared to those treated with comparable systemic strategies in contemporary trials. Our results provide a basis for future research on treatment and survival after the introduction of immunotherapy for mBC, aiming to improve the care and outcome of patients with mBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Tanem Møller
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Gunnar Tafjord
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Augun Blindheim
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Department of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Viktor Berge
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie Fosså
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Côté G, Alqaisi H, Chan CT, Jiang DM, Kandel C, Pelletier K, Wald R, Sridhar SS, Kitchlu A. Kidney and Cancer Outcomes with Standard Versus Alternative Chemotherapy Regimens for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. KIDNEY360 2023; 4:e1203-e1211. [PMID: 37461133 PMCID: PMC10547229 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Key Points Many patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma are deemed cisplatin-ineligible because of reduced kidney function. Options include split-dose cisplatin or carboplatin. There was no significant association between regimen type and AKI. Alternative regimens were associated with higher risk of progressive disease. There is a need to revisit cisplatin eligibility criteria and develop strategies to optimize cancer treatment for patients with CKD. Background Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens remain the optimal first-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, many patients are deemed cisplatin-ineligible, predominantly because of reduced kidney function. Other treatment options include split-dose cisplatin, carboplatin, and non–platinum-based regimens. We compared the incidence of AKI and cancer outcomes within three chemotherapy regimens. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mUC who received first-line chemotherapy from 2005 to 2019. We compared standard gemcitabine–cisplatin (gem-cis) with two alternative regimens: (1 ) gem-cis split-dose regimen (split) with cisplatin divided over days 1 and 8 and (2 ) combination of gemcitabine–carboplatin or single-agent gemcitabine (gem/gem-carbo). The primary outcome was Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes–defined AKI. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and progression-free survival. Results We identified 183 patients (98 gem-cis, 32 split, and 53 gem/gem-carbo). Median baseline eGFR in the gem/cis group was 78 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (interquartile range, 66–91), in the split group 64 (48–77), and in the gem/gem-carbo 45 (33–57). There was no significant association between regimen type and incidence of AKI when adjusted for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, and visceral disease. The adjusted hazard ratios were 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 2.78; P = 0.49) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.46 to 2.07; P = 0.95) for split and gem/gem-carbo groups, respectively, versus gem-cis. Split and gem/gem-carbo regimens were associated with higher mortality and progressive disease relative to gem-cis with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.33; P = 0.04) and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.31 to 2.95; P < 0.01), respectively. Median progression free survival was 8.1 (interquartile range, 4.6–14.8), 6.1 (4.1–9.3), and 4.4 (2.3–8.6) months in the gem-cis, split, and gem/gem-carbo groups. Conclusions There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI between the three regimens studied. However, standard gem-cis was associated with improved cancer outcomes. Novel regimens and kidney protective strategies are needed for patients with mUC with kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Côté
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Husam Alqaisi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Prince Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher T Chan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Di Maria Jiang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Prince Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Kandel
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karyne Pelletier
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ron Wald
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Unity Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srikala S. Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Prince Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abhijat Kitchlu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kearney M, Zhang L, Hubscher E, Musat M, Harricharan S, Wilke T. Undertreatment in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol 2023; 20:1123-1137. [PMID: 37526215 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess rates of no systemic treatment (NST), attrition across lines of therapy, and factors influencing treatment selection in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). Methods: Systematic literature review to identify real-world studies reporting NST or attrition rates in la/mUC from 2017-2022 (including data reported since 2015). Results: Of 2439 publications screened, 29 reported NST rates, ranging from 40-74% in eight European-based studies, 14-60% in 12 US-based studies, and 9-63% in nine studies in other locations (meta-analysis estimate, 39%). Factors associated with NST or no second-line therapy included older age, female sex, poor performance status, poor renal function and distant metastases. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with la/mUC do not receive guideline-recommended treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Wilke
- Cytel, Waltham, MA, USA
- IPAM e.V., University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Powles T, Park SH, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, Ullén A, Loriot Y, Sridhar SS, Sternberg CN, Bellmunt J, Aragon-Ching JB, Wang J, Huang B, Laliberte RJ, di Pietro A, Grivas P. Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial After ≥2 Years of Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2201792. [PMID: 37071838 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Initial results from the phase III JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02603432) showed that avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who were progression-free after 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Avelumab 1L maintenance treatment is now a standard of care for aUC. Here, we report updated data with ≥ 2 years of follow-up in all patients, including OS (primary end point), PFS, safety, and additional novel analyses. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). At data cutoff (June 4, 2021), median follow-up was 38.0 months and 39.6 months, respectively; 67 patients (19.5%) had received ≥2 years of avelumab treatment. OS remained longer with avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone in all patients (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.91]; 2-sided P = .0036). Investigator-assessed PFS analyses also favored avelumab. Longer-term safety was consistent with previous analyses; no new safety signals were identified with longer treatment duration. In conclusion, longer-term follow-up continues to show clinically meaningful efficacy benefits with avelumab 1L maintenance plus BSC versus BSC alone in patients with aUC. An interactive visualization of data reported in this article is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Gustave Roussy, INSERMU981, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eto M, Lee JL, Chang YH, Gao S, Singh M, Gurney H. Clinical evidence and insights supporting the use of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e191-e203. [PMID: 35238147 PMCID: PMC9542411 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, international and Asia-specific guidelines for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) recommended first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by second-line (2L) anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy where possible, or 1L ICI therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with PD-L1+ tumors. However, long-term outcomes remain poor and only a minority of patients receive 2L therapy. The JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial-which assessed avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) as 1L maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced UC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy-is the only phase 3 trial of ICI-based treatment in the 1L setting to show significantly improved overall survival, and this treatment approach is now recommended in updated treatment guidelines. Available data from the trial suggest that efficacy and safety in patients enrolled in the Asia-Pacific region were similar to findings in the overall population. In this review, we discuss the treatment of advanced UC, with a specific focus on studies in the Asia-Pacific region, and summarize key findings supporting the use of avelumab 1L maintenance as a standard of care in this setting both in cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible patients and irrespective of PD-L1 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Seasea Gao
- Merck Pte. Ltd., Singapore, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | | | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sørup S, Darvalics B, Khalil AA, Nordsmark M, Hæe M, Donskov F, Agerbæk M, Russo L, Oksen D, Boutmy E, Verpillat P, Cronin-Fenton D. Treatment and Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Urothelial, Ovarian, Gastric and Kidney Cancer: A Nationwide Comprehensive Evaluation. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13:871-882. [PMID: 34588817 PMCID: PMC8473934 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s326470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Few studies have described real-world treatment patterns and survival before the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to describe anti-cancer treatment including the use of programmed cell death-1 and ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) ICIs and overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients as a benchmarking real-world standard before widespread use of ICIs. Patients and Methods Using nationwide Danish medical registries, we assembled cohorts of Danish patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=12,283), urothelial carcinoma (n=2504), epithelial ovarian cancer (n=1466), gastric adenocarcinoma (n=1457), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n=1261) diagnosed between 1/1/2013 and 31/12/2017. We describe anti-cancer treatment and OS using proportions, medians, and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Between 9% (ovarian cancer) and 25% (gastric adenocarcinoma) of patients did not receive anti-cancer treatment. The remaining patients received surgery, radiation therapy, and/or medical therapy. Chemotherapy was the most frequent medical therapy in all cohorts except for RCC (tyrosine kinase inhibitors). PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs were used in 7-8% of the NSCLC and RCC cohorts-mainly as second or higher line treatments. OS was longest in patients starting treatment with surgery (eg 25.6 months [95%-confidence interval (CI)=21.9-29.4] for NSCLC and 21.4 months [95%-CI=19.8-23.5] for urothelial carcinoma) and shortest for radiation therapy (eg 3.9 months [95%-CI=3.6-4.2] for NSCLC and 12.6 months [95%-CI=9.2-17.5] for urothelial carcinoma). NSCLC patients starting with medical therapy had OS between these limits. Median OS for NSCLC patients starting treatment with PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs was 21.4 months (95%-CI=13.9-not estimable). Conclusion Most patients with advanced NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma and RCC had poor OS in an era where only a minority received PD-L1/PD-1 ICIs. This information on treatment patterns and survival is important as a benchmarking real-world standard before widespread use of ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Sørup
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bianka Darvalics
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mette Hæe
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Frede Donskov
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Leo Russo
- Worldwide Medical and Safety, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Dina Oksen
- Global Epidemiology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | - Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Swami U, Grivas P, Pal SK, Agarwal N. Utilization of systemic therapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma: Lessons from real world experience. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100325. [PMID: 33549986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic bladder cancer has poor overall survival. Though systemic therapies have shown to improve overall survival, real-world studies have shown that more than half of the patients do not receive any systemic therapy, while only around 15-20% receive second-line therapy. Even in patients receiving systemic therapies a disproportionately higher use of carboplatin is observed in the first line despite proven superior effectiveness of cisplatin. Reasons for these observations include moderate effectiveness and relatively toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, concerns with performance status and co-morbidities in this predominantly older patient population, communications barriers, lack of social support, and access to affordable healthcare. Herein we discuss potential ways to overcome these challenges which include (1) preventing/delaying metastatic disease by maximizing the receipt of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based therapy, and development of better tolerated and more effective neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, (2) use of avelumab maintenance therapy after 4-6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy to overcome attrition of patients from first to second-line therapy, (3) advancing effective and well-tolerated systemic therapies such as enfortumab vedotin, and erdafitinib to the first-line metastatic setting or even to the localized setting, (4) further development of effective and well-tolerated therapies like sacituzumab govitecan, a novel antibody-drug conjugate and (5) improving affordability and accessibility to systemic therapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umang Swami
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|