1
|
Santo G, di Santo G, Cicone F, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with somatostatin analogs beyond gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Neuroendocrinol 2025; 37:e70013. [PMID: 40064181 PMCID: PMC11919479 DOI: 10.1111/jne.70013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
First isolated by Brazeau et al. in 1972, somatostatin (SST) is a neuropeptide known for regulating various signaling pathways through its specific cell surface receptors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) comprise a family of five G protein-coupled receptors that are widely distributed across the human body and are expressed by various tumor types. The growing understanding of their clinical potential led to the introduction of both cold and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs), which have revolutionized the management of several cancers, especially neuroendocrine tumors. As a direct consequence, advances in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) over the last 30 years led to the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). Theoretically, any cancer patients whose tumors express SSTR, as demonstrated in vivo through SSTR-based molecular imaging, could be candidates for PRRT, especially those with limited treatment options. However, evidence on the efficacy of PRRT in non-GEPNET SSTR-expressing tumors is limited, and mainly derived from small retrospective studies. Given the limited therapeutic options for advanced/metastatic patients, there is a clear need for randomized trials to formally approve PRRT with SSAs for patients who may benefit from this treatment, particularly in certain types of neuroendocrine neoplasms such as lung carcinoids, paragangliomas, and meningiomas, where high rates of disease control (up to 80%) can be achieved. In addition, emerging evidence supports the potential of combination therapies, alpha emitters, and non-SSTR-based radionuclide therapy in tumors beyond GEPNET. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of PRRT's role in cancers beyond GEPNET, exploring new possibilities and future directions for most SSTR highly expressing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo di Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mair MJ, Tabouret E, Johnson DR, Sulman EP, Wen PY, Preusser M, Albert NL. Radioligand therapies in meningioma: Evidence and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S215-S228. [PMID: 38702966 PMCID: PMC11631075 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grades 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after the exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside this, integrated molecular imaging allows for a noninvasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of "theranostics" has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of "theranostic" treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Mair
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Emeline Tabouret
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, GlioME Team, plateforme PETRA, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cicone F, Gnesin S, Santo G, Stokke C, Bartolomei M, Cascini GL, Minniti G, Paganelli G, Verger A, Cremonesi M. Do we need dosimetry for the optimization of theranostics in CNS tumors? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S242-S258. [PMID: 39351795 PMCID: PMC11631076 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical theranostic treatments have grown exponentially worldwide, and internal dosimetry has attracted attention and resources. Despite some similarities with chemotherapy, radiopharmaceutical treatments are essentially radiotherapy treatments, as the release of radiation into tissues is the determinant of the observed clinical effects. Therefore, absorbed dose calculations are key to explaining dose-effect correlations and individualizing radiopharmaceutical treatments. The present article introduces the basic principles of internal dosimetry and provides an overview of available loco-regional and systemic radiopharmaceutical treatments for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The specific characteristics of dosimetry as applied to these treatments are highlighted, along with their limitations and most relevant results. Dosimetry is performed with higher precision and better reproducibility than in the past, and dosimetric data should be systematically collected, as treatment planning and verification may help exploit the full potential of theranostic of CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giulia Santo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Diagnostic Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori,”Meldola, Italy
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, IADI, INSERM, UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albert NL, Preusser M, Traub-Weidinger T, Tolboom N, Law I, Palmer JD, Guedj E, Furtner J, Fraioli F, Huang RY, Johnson DR, Deroose CM, Herrmann K, Vogelbaum M, Chang S, Tonn JC, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Verger A, Ivanidze J, Galldiks N. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:3662-3679. [PMID: 38898354 PMCID: PMC11445317 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna Health Care Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Division Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric Guedj
- Institut Fresnel, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Julia Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) - University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lisowski D, Hartrampf PE, Hasenauer N, Nickl V, Monoranu CM, Tamihardja J. Complete loss of E-cadherin expression in a rare case of metastatic malignant meningioma: a case report. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:398. [PMID: 37925427 PMCID: PMC10625181 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03450-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hematogenous tumor spread of malignant meningiomas occurs very rarely but is associated with very poor prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION We report an unusual case of a patient with a malignant meningioma who developed multiple metastases in bones, lungs and liver after initial complete resection of the primary tumor. After partial hepatic resection, specimens were histologically analyzed, and a complete loss of E-cadherin adhesion molecules was found. No oncogenic target mutations were found. The patient received a combination of conventional radiotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Due to aggressive tumor behavior and rapid spread of metastases, the patient deceased after initiation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS E-cadherin downregulation is associated with a higher probability of tumor invasion and distant metastasis formation in malignant meningioma. Up to now, the efficacy of systemic therapy, including PRRT, is very limited in malignant meningioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Lisowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany, Germany.
| | - Philipp E Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Natalie Hasenauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Vera Nickl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Camelia-Maria Monoranu
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iglseder S, Iglseder A, Beliveau V, Heugenhauser J, Gizewski ER, Kerschbaumer J, Stockhammer G, Uprimny C, Virgolini I, Dudas J, Nevinny-Stickel M, Nowosielski M, Scherfler C. Somatostatin receptor subtype expression and radiomics from DWI-MRI represent SUV of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET in patients with meningioma. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:711-720. [PMID: 37707754 PMCID: PMC10589159 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04414-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to analyse the correlation between somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR 1-5) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in meningioma patients using Gallium-68 DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide Positron Emission Tomography ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET). Secondly, we developed a radiomic model based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images (DWI MRI) to reproduce SUVmax. METHOD The study included 51 patients who underwent MRI and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET before meningioma surgery. SUVmax values were quantified from PET images and tumour areas were segmented on post-contrast T1-weighted MRI and mapped to ADC maps. A total of 1940 radiomic features were extracted from the tumour area on each ADC map. A random forest regression model was trained to predict SUVmax and the model's performance was evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation. The expression of SSTR subtypes was quantified in 18 surgical specimens and compared to SUVmax values. RESULTS The random forest regression model successfully predicted SUVmax values with a significant correlation observed in all 100 repeats (p < 0.05). The mean Pearson's r was 0.42 ± 0.07 SD, and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 28.46 ± 0.16. SSTR subtypes 2A, 2B, and 5 showed significant correlations with SUVmax values (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.669; p = 0.001, R2 = 0.393; and p = 0.012, R2 = 0.235, respectively). CONCLUSION SSTR subtypes 2A, 2B, and 5 correlated significantly with SUVmax in meningioma patients. The developed radiomic model based on ADC maps effectively reproduces SUVmax using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Iglseder
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anna Iglseder
- Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vincent Beliveau
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Elke R Gizewski
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Neuroradiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | - Christian Uprimny
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jozsef Dudas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Christoph Scherfler
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Neuroradiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marques P. The Effects of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy on the Neoplastic and Normal Pituitary. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2710. [PMID: 37345047 PMCID: PMC10216433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are usually benign and slow-growing; however, in some cases, they may behave aggressively and become resistant to conventional treatments. Therapeutic options for aggressive or metastatic PitNETs are limited, and currently mainly consist of temozolomide, with little experience of other emerging approaches, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Somatostatin receptor expression in PitNETs explains the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for treating PitNETs, particularly those hypersecreting pituitary hormones, such as growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone. The expression of such receptors in pituitary tumour cells has provided the rationale for using PRRT to treat patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. However, the PRRT efficacy in this setting remains unestablished, as knowledge on this today is based only on few case reports and small series of cases, which are reviewed here. A total of 30 PRRT-treated patients have been thus far reported: 23 aggressive PitNETs, 5 carcinomas, and 2 of malignancy status unspecified. Of the 27 published cases with information regarding the response to PRRT, 5 (18%) showed a partial response, 8 (30%) had stable disease, and 14 (52%) had progressive disease. No major adverse effects have been reported, and there is also no increased risk of clinically relevant hypopituitarism in patients with pituitary or non-pituitary neuroendocrine tumours following PRRT. PRRT may be regarded as a safe option for patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs if other treatment approaches are not feasible or have failed in controlling the disease progression, with tumour shrinkage occurring in up to a fifth of cases, while about a third of aggressive pituitary tumours may achieve stable disease. Here, the data on PRRT in the management of patients with aggressive pituitary tumours are reviewed, as well as the effects of PRRT on the pituitary function in other PRRT-treated cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Marques
- Pituitary Tumor Unit, Endocrinology Department, Hospital CUF Descobertas, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal;
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 2635-631 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Urso L, Nieri A, Uccelli L, Castello A, Artioli P, Cittanti C, Marzola MC, Florimonte L, Castellani M, Bissoli S, Porto F, Boschi A, Evangelista L, Bartolomei M. Lutathera® Orphans: State of the Art and Future Application of Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041110. [PMID: 37111596 PMCID: PMC10142322 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lutathera® is the first EMA- and FDA-approved radiopharmaceutical for radioligand therapy (RLT). Currently, on the legacy of the NETTER1 trial, only adult patients with progressive unresectable somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET) can be treated with Lutathera®. Conversely, patients with SSTR-positive disease arising from outside the gastroenteric region do not currently have access to Lutathera® treatment despite several papers in the literature reporting the effectiveness and safety of RLT in these settings. Moreover, patients with well-differentiated G3 GEP-NET are also still “Lutathera orphans”, and retreatment with RLT in patients with disease relapse is currently not approved. The aim of this critical review is to summarize current literature evidence assessing the role of Lutathera® outside the approved indications. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluating new possible applications of Lutathera® will be considered and discussed to provide an updated picture of future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Licia Uccelli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-053-232-6387
| | - Angelo Castello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Paolo Artioli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Maria Cristina Marzola
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Luigia Florimonte
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimo Castellani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Sergio Bissoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesca Porto
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
| | - Alessandra Boschi
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Graillon T, Tabouret E, Salgues B, Horowitz T, Padovani L, Appay R, Farah K, Dufour H, Régis J, Guedj E, Barlier A, Chinot O. Innovative treatments for meningiomas. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:449-463. [PMID: 36959063 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Multi-recurrent high-grade meningiomas remain an unmet medical need in neuro-oncology when iterative surgeries and radiation therapy sessions fail to control tumor growth. Nevertheless, the last 10years have been marked by multiple advances in the comprehension of meningioma tumorigenesis via the discovery of new driver mutations, the identification of activated intracellular signaling pathways, and DNA methylation analyses, providing multiple potential therapeutic targets. Today, Anti-VEGF and mTOR inhibitors are the most used and probably the most active drugs in aggressive meningiomas. Peptide radioactive radiation therapy aims to target SSTR2A receptors, which are strongly expressed in meningiomas, but have an insufficient effect in most aggressive meningiomas, requiring the development of new techniques to increase the dose applied to the tumor. Based on the multiple potential intracellular targets, multiple targeted therapy clinical trials targeting Pi3K-Akt-mTOR and MAP kinase pathways as well as cell cycle and particularly, cyclin D4-6 are ongoing. Recently discovered driver mutations, SMO, Akt, and PI3KCA, offer new targets but are mostly observed in benign meningiomas, limiting their clinical relevance mainly to rare aggressive skull base meningiomas. Therefore, NF2 mutation remains the most frequent mutation and main challenging target in high-grade meningioma. Recently, inhibitors of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is involved in tumor cell adhesion, were tested in a phase 2 clinical trial with interesting but insufficient activity. The Hippo pathway was demonstrated to interact with NF2/Merlin and could be a promising target in NF2-mutated meningiomas with ongoing multiple preclinical studies and a phase 1 clinical trial. Recent advances in immune landscape comprehension led to the proposal of the use of immunotherapy in meningiomas. Except in rare cases of MSH2/6 mutation or high tumor mass burden, the activity of PD-1 inhibitors remains limited; however, its combination with various radiation therapy modalities is particularly promising. On the whole, therapeutic management of high-grade meningiomas is still challenging even with multiple promising therapeutic targets and innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Graillon
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Neurosurgery department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.
| | - E Tabouret
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| | - B Salgues
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - T Horowitz
- AP-HM, CNRS, centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - L Padovani
- AP-HM, Timone Hospital, Radiotherapy Department, Marseille, France
| | - R Appay
- AP-HM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France
| | - K Farah
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, UMR Inserm 1106, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - H Dufour
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Neurosurgery department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - J Régis
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, UMR Inserm 1106, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - E Guedj
- AP-HM, CNRS, centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - A Barlier
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Laboratory of Molecular Biology Hospital La Conception, Marseille, France
| | - O Chinot
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Minczeles NS, Bos EM, de Leeuw RC, Kros JM, Konijnenberg MW, Bromberg JEC, de Herder WW, Dirven CMF, Hofland J, Brabander T. Efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in 15 patients with progressive treatment-refractory meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1195-1204. [PMID: 36454268 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06044-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no evidence-based systemic therapy for patients with progressive meningiomas for whom surgery or external radiotherapy is no longer an option. In this study, the efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with progressive, treatment-refractory meningiomas were evaluated. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all meningioma patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE from 2000 to 2020 in our centre. Primary outcomes were response according to RANO bidimensional and volumetric criteria and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) and tumour growth rate (TGR) were secondary endpoints. TGR was calculated as the percentage change in surface or volume per month. RESULTS Fifteen meningioma patients received [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (7.5-29.6 GBq). Prior to PRRT, all patients had received external radiotherapy, and 14 patients had undergone surgery. All WHO grades were included WHO 1 (n=3), WHO 2 (n=5), and WHO 3 (n=6). After PRRT, stable disease was observed in six (40%) patients. The median PFS was 7.8 months with a 6-month PFS rate of 60%. The median OS was 13.6 months with a 12-month OS rate of 60%. All patients had progressive disease prior to PRRT, with an average TGR of 4.6% increase in surface and 14.8% increase in volume per month. After PRRT, TGR declined to 3.1% in surface (p=0.016) and 5.0% in volume (p=0.013) per month. CONCLUSION In this cohort of meningioma patients with exhaustion of surgical and radiotherapeutic options and progressive disease, it was shown that PRRT plays a role in controlling tumour growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie S Minczeles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eelke M Bos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reinoud C de Leeuw
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan M Kros
- Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark W Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wouter W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lisowski D, Trömel J, Lutyj P, Lewitzki V, Hartrampf PE, Polat B, Flentje M, Tamihardja J. Health-related quality of life and clinical outcome after radiotherapy of patients with intracranial meningioma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19730. [PMID: 36396802 PMCID: PMC9672325 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24192-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective, single-institutional study investigated long-term outcome, toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in meningioma patients after radiotherapy. We analyzed the data of 119 patients who received radiotherapy at our department from 1997 to 2014 for intracranial WHO grade I-III meningioma. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or radiosurgery radiation was applied. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires were completed for assessment of HRQoL. Overall survival (OS) for the entire study group was 89.6% at 5 years and 75.9% at 10 years. Local control (LC) at 5 and 10 years was 82.4% and 73.4%, respectively. Local recurrence was observed in 22 patients (18.5%). Higher grade acute and chronic toxicities were observed in seven patients (5.9%) and five patients (4.2%), respectively. Global health status was rated with a mean of 59.9 points (SD 22.3) on QLQ-C30. In conclusion, radiotherapy resulted in very good long-term survival and tumor control rates with low rates of severe toxicities but with a deterioration of long-term HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Lisowski
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Jannik Trömel
- grid.415896.70000 0004 0493 3473Department of Internal Medicine, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Paul Lutyj
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Philipp E. Hartrampf
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Tamihardja
- grid.411760.50000 0001 1378 7891Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Somatostatin Receptor Theranostics for Refractory Meningiomas. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5550-5565. [PMID: 36005176 PMCID: PMC9406720 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a promising approach for treatment-refractory meningiomas progressing after surgery and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to provide outcomes of patients harboring refractory meningiomas treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE and an overall analysis of progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) of the same relevant studies in the literature. Eight patients with recurrent and progressive WHO grade II meningiomas were treated after multimodal pretreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE between 2019 and 2022. Primary and secondarily endpoints were progression-free survival at 6-months (PFS-6) and toxicity, respectively. PFS-6 analysis of our case series was compared with other similar relevant studies that included 86 patients treated with either 177Lu-DOTATATE or 90Y-DOTATOC. Our retrospective study showed a PFS-6 of 85.7% for WHO grade II progressive refractory meningiomas. Treatment was clinically and biologically well tolerated. The overall analysis of the previous relevant studies showed a PFS-6 of 89.7% for WHO grade I meningiomas (n = 29); 57.1% for WHO grade II (n = 21); and 0 % for WHO grade III (n = 12). For all grades (n = 86), including unknown grades, PFS-6 was 58.1%. SSTR-targeted PRRT allowed us to achieve prolonged PFS-6 in patients with WHO grade I and II progressive refractory meningiomas, except the most aggressive WHO grade II tumors. Large scale randomized trials are warranted for the better integration of PRRT in the treatment of refractory meningioma into clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bartolomei M, Berruti A, Falconi M, Fazio N, Ferone D, Lastoria S, Pappagallo G, Seregni E, Versari A. Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102501. [PMID: 35626105 PMCID: PMC9140035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence. Abstract Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirco Bartolomei
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Presidio Ospedaliero Arcispedale Sant’Anna di Cona, 44124 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Medical Oncology, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreas Surgical Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologya and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Secondo Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Pappagallo
- School of Clinical Methodology IRCCS “Sacred Heart–Don Calabria” Hospital; 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy;
| | - Ettore Seregni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fodi CK, Schittenhelm J, Honegger J, Castaneda-Vega SG, Behling F. The Current Role of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Meningiomas. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092364. [PMID: 35566491 PMCID: PMC9104797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The majority of patients can be cured by surgery, or tumor growth can be stabilized by radiation. However, the management of recurrent and more aggressive tumors remains difficult because no established alternative treatment options exist. Therefore, innovative therapeutic approaches are needed. Studies have shown that meningiomas express somatostatin receptors. It is well known from treating neuroendocrine tumors that peptide radioreceptor therapy that targets somatostatin receptors can be effective. As yet, this therapy has been used for treating meningiomas only within individual curative trials. However, small case series and studies have demonstrated stabilization of the disease. Therefore, we see potential for optimizing this therapeutic option through the development of new substances and specific adaptations to the different meningioma subtypes. The current review provides an overview of this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina-Katharina Fodi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Salvador Guillermo Castaneda-Vega
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix Behling
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-707129-80235; Fax: +49-707129-4549
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, Sahm F, Mawrin C, Weber DC, Preusser M, Minniti G, Lund-Johansen M, Lefranc F, Houdart E, Sallabanda K, Le Rhun E, Nieuwenhuizen D, Tabatabai G, Soffietti R, Weller M. EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1821-1834. [PMID: 34181733 PMCID: PMC8563316 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 349] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Yet, only few controlled clinical trials have been conducted to guide clinical decision making, resulting in variations of management approaches across countries and centers. However, recent advances in molecular genetics and clinical trial results help to refine the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to meningioma. Accordingly, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) updated its recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. A provisional diagnosis of meningioma is typically made by neuroimaging, mostly magnetic resonance imaging. Such provisional diagnoses may be made incidentally. Accordingly, a significant proportion of meningiomas, notably in patients that are asymptomatic or elderly or both, may be managed by a watch-and-scan strategy. A surgical intervention with tissue, commonly with the goal of gross total resection, is required for the definitive diagnosis according to the WHO classification. A role for molecular profiling including gene panel sequencing and genomic methylation profiling is emerging. A gross total surgical resection including the involved dura is often curative. Inoperable or recurrent tumors requiring treatment can be treated with radiosurgery, if the size or the vicinity of critical structures allows that, or with fractionated radiotherapy (RT). Treatment concepts combining surgery and radiosurgery or fractionated RT are increasingly used, although there remain controversies regard timing, type, and dosing of the various RT approaches. Radionuclide therapy targeting somatostatin receptors is an experimental approach, as are all approaches of systemic pharmacotherapy. The best albeit modest results with pharmacotherapy have been obtained with bevacizumab or multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, but no standard of care systemic treatment has been yet defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pantelis Stavrinou
- Neurosurgical Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece and Center of Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Mawrin
- Department of Neuropathology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Morten Lund-Johansen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bergen University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Florence Lefranc
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emanuel Houdart
- Service de Neuroradiologie, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France
| | - Kita Sallabanda
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- CyberKnife Centre, Genesiscare Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Center for Neurooncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abbott EM, Falzone N, Lenzo N, Vallis KA. Combining External Beam Radiation and Radionuclide Therapies: Rationale, Radiobiology, Results and Roadblocks. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:735-743. [PMID: 34544640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of effective radionuclide therapeutics, such as radium-223 dichloride, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA ligands, over the last 10 years is driving a rapid expansion in molecular radiotherapy (MRT) research. Clinical trials that are underway will help to define optimal dosing protocols and identify groups of patients who are likely to benefit from this form of treatment. Clinical investigations are also being conducted to combine new MRT agents with other anticancer drugs, with particular emphasis on DNA repair inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. In this review, the case is presented for combining MRT with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The technical and dosimetric challenges of combining two radiotherapeutic modalities have impeded progress in the past. However, the need for research into the specific radiobiological effects of radionuclide therapy, which has lagged behind that for EBRT, has been recognised. This, together with innovations in imaging technology, MRT dosimetry tools and EBRT hardware, will facilitate the future use of this important combination of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Abbott
- MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - N Falzone
- GenesisCare, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - N Lenzo
- GenesisCare Theranostics, St John of God Murdoch Cancer Centre, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, Notre Dame University Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - K A Vallis
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Combination Therapies with PRRT. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14101005. [PMID: 34681229 PMCID: PMC8538931 DOI: 10.3390/ph14101005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a successful targeted radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, complete responses remain elusive. Combined treatments anticipate synergistic effects and thus better responses by combining ionizing radiation with other anti-tumor treatments. Furthermore, multimodal therapies often have a balanced toxicity profile. To date, few studies have evaluated the effect of combination therapies with PRRT, some of them phase I/II trials. This review will focus on several clinically tested, tailored approaches to improving the effects of PRRT. The aim is to help clinicians in the treatment planning of NETs to choose the most effective and safe treatment for each patient in the sense of personalized medicine. Current promising combination partners of PRRT are somatostatin analogues (SSAs), chemotherapy, molecular targeted treatment, liver radioembolization, and dual radionuclide PRRT (Lutetium-177-PRRT combined with Yttrium-90-PRRT).
Collapse
|
18
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and Primary Brain Tumors: An Overview. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14090872. [PMID: 34577572 PMCID: PMC8470698 DOI: 10.3390/ph14090872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary brain tumors (PBTs) are some of the most difficult types of cancer to treat, and despite advancements in surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, new strategies for the treatment of PBTs are needed, especially for those with poor prognosis such as inoperable/difficult-to-reach lesions or relapsing disease. In regard to the last point, malignant primary brain tumors remain some of the most lethal types of cancer. Nuclear medicine may provide exciting new weapons and significant contributions in the treatment of PBTs. In this review, we performed literature research in order to highlight the possible role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of PBTs with radiolabeled molecules that bind with high-affinity transmembrane receptors such as somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), neurokinin type-1 receptor and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). These receptors are overexpressed in some cancer types such as gliomas, meningiomas, pituitary tumors and medulloblastomas. A comprehensive overview of possible applications in this field will be shown, providing knowledge about benefits, feasibility, developments and limitations of PRRT in this type of tumor, also revealing new advantages in the management of the disease.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferdinandus J, Fendler WP, Morigi JJ, Fanti S. Theranostics in oncology: What radiologists want to know. Eur J Radiol 2021; 142:109875. [PMID: 34391057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Combination of radioligand imaging and therapy, so called radiotheranostics, is a novel tool of precision oncology with proven clinical value. In-depth knowledge of functional imaging nuances is critically needed for precise prognostication and guidance of management. Here, we review theranostic applications with up to Phase III type evidence for outcome improvement: Imaging and therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) exploiting high levels of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression and radiotheranostics of prostate cancer targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). This narrative review focusses on these two applications and elucidates patient selection and response assessment by radioligand scintigraphy and/or positron emission tomography. Furthermore, we provide a brief outlook on future applications for novel targets outside of NEN and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Joshua James Morigi
- PET/CT Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia.
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Suman SK, Subramanian S, Mukherjee A. Combination radionuclide therapy: A new paradigm. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 98-99:40-58. [PMID: 34029984 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Targeted molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) has shown its potential for the treatment of cancers of multiple origins. A combination therapy strategy employing two or more distinct therapeutic approaches in cancer management is aimed at circumventing tumor resistance by simultaneously targeting compensatory signaling pathways or bypassing survival selection mutations acquired in response to individual monotherapies. Combination radionuclide therapy (CRT) is a newer application of the concept, utilizing a combination of radiolabeled molecular targeting agents with chemotherapy and beam radiation therapy for enhanced therapeutic index. Encouraging results are reported with chemotherapeutic agents in combination with radiolabeled targeting molecules for cancer therapy. With increasing awareness of the various survival and stress response pathways activated after radionuclide therapy, different holistic combinations of MRT agents with radiosensitizers targeting such pathways have also been explored. MRT has also been studied in combination with beam radiotherapy modalities such as external beam radiation therapy and carbon ion radiation therapy to enhance the anti-tumor response. Nanotechnology aids in CRT by bringing together multiple monotherapies on a single nanostructure platform for treating cancers in a more precise or personalized way. CRT will be a key player in managing cancers if correctly tailored to the individual patient profile. The success of CRT lies in an in-depth understanding of the radiobiological principles and pathways activated in response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shishu Kant Suman
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Suresh Subramanian
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Archana Mukherjee
- Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kertels O, Breun M, Hänscheid H, Kircher M, Hartrampf PE, Schirbel A, Monoranu CM, Ernestus RI, Buck AK, Löhr M, Matthies C, Lapa C. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Initial Experience. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:e312-e316. [PMID: 33826573 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a genetic disorder that is associated with multiple tumors of the nervous system, and approximately one half of patients present with meningiomas. For patients with multifocal disease, somatostatin receptor-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) might be a suitable systemic treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between March 2015 and August 2017, 11 NF2 patients (7 females and 4 males; mean age, 39 ± 12 years) with multifocal, progressive meningiomas underwent a median of 4 cycles of PRRT (range, 2-6 cycles). Acute and chronic adverse events were recorded according to National Institutes of Health's Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 5.0. Follow-up MRIs (every 3 to 6 months), using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology response criteria for meningiomas, were used to assess treatment responses. RESULTS Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was well tolerated in all patients without any relevant acute adverse effects. Transient hematologic toxicity (CTC grade 3) was observed in 2 subjects. Somatostatin receptor-directed radiopeptide therapy resulted in radiological disease stabilization in 6 of 11 patients. Median progression-free survival was 12 months (range, 1-55 months), and overall survival was 37 months (range, 5-61 months). CONCLUSIONS Based on our retrospective pilot data, PRRT is feasible and well-tolerated in NF2 patients. It might offer a suitable treatment option in subjects with multiple, recurrent, or treatment-refractory meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Andreas Schirbel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Camelia-Maria Monoranu
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Differences in the expression of SSTR1-5 in meningiomas and its therapeutic potential. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:467-478. [PMID: 33899156 PMCID: PMC8827401 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01552-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Beyond microsurgical resection and radiation therapy, there are currently no established treatment alternatives for meningioma patients. In selected cases, peptide radio receptor therapy (PRRT) can be implemented. For this purpose, a radionuclide is bound to a substance targeting specific receptors in meningiomas. One of them is somatostatin receptor 2, which can be found in most meningiomas. However, other somatostatin receptors (SSTR) exist, but their expressions have only been described in small case series. In this study, we analyzed the expression of SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5 in a large cohort of meningiomas in order to enable further refinement of this innovative treatment option. Overall, 726 tumor samples were processed into tissue microarrays and stained for SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5 immunohistochemically. Microscopic evaluation was done with an established semiquantitative score regarding percentual quantification and staining intensity, and results were correlated with clinical data. There was a significant lower rate of SSTR1 expression in meningiomas of male patients. Older age was associated with higher expression of SSTR1, 2A, and 5 and lower scores for SSTR3 and 4. Tumors treated with radiotherapy before resection showed lower rates of SSTR1 and 5 expression, while recurrent meningiomas had lower SSTR1 scores. Tumor tissue from patients suffering from neurofibromatosis type 2 had lower expression scores for SSTR1, 2, and 5. For SSTR3 and 4, NF2 patients showed higher scores than sporadic tumors. Spinal meningiomas had higher scores for SSTR1, 4, and 5 compared tumor location of the skull base and convexity/falx. Overall, higher WHO grade was associated with lower SSTR scores. While all SSTRs were expressed, there are marked differences of SSTR expression between meningioma subgroups. This has the potential to drive the development of more selective PRRT substances with higher treatment efficacy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Moody TW, Lee L, Ramos-Alvarez I, Iordanskaia T, Mantey SA, Jensen RT. Bombesin Receptor Family Activation and CNS/Neural Tumors: Review of Evidence Supporting Possible Role for Novel Targeted Therapy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:728088. [PMID: 34539578 PMCID: PMC8441013 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.728088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are increasingly being considered as possible therapeutic targets in cancers. Activation of GPCR on tumors can have prominent growth effects, and GPCRs are frequently over-/ectopically expressed on tumors and thus can be used for targeted therapy. CNS/neural tumors are receiving increasing attention using this approach. Gliomas are the most frequent primary malignant brain/CNS tumor with glioblastoma having a 10-year survival <1%; neuroblastomas are the most common extracranial solid tumor in children with long-term survival<40%, and medulloblastomas are less common, but one subgroup has a 5-year survival <60%. Thus, there is an increased need for more effective treatments of these tumors. The Bombesin-receptor family (BnRs) is one of the GPCRs that are most frequently over/ectopically expressed by common tumors and is receiving particular attention as a possible therapeutic target in several tumors, particularly in prostate, breast, and lung cancer. We review in this paper evidence suggesting why a similar approach in some CNS/neural tumors (gliomas, neuroblastomas, medulloblastomas) should also be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry W. Moody
- Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Training, Office of the Director, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Irene Ramos-Alvarez
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tatiana Iordanskaia
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Samuel A. Mantey
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- *Correspondence: Robert T. Jensen,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Eychenne R, Bouvry C, Bourgeois M, Loyer P, Benoist E, Lepareur N. Overview of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Molecules 2020; 25:E4012. [PMID: 32887456 PMCID: PMC7504749 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25174012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Identified in 1973, somatostatin (SST) is a cyclic hormone peptide with a short biological half-life. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are widely expressed in the whole body, with five subtypes described. The interaction between SST and its receptors leads to the internalization of the ligand-receptor complex and triggers different cellular signaling pathways. Interestingly, the expression of SSTRs is significantly enhanced in many solid tumors, especially gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Thus, somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have been developed to improve the stability of the endogenous ligand and so extend its half-life. Radiolabeled analogs have been developed with several radioelements such as indium-111, technetium-99 m, and recently gallium-68, fluorine-18, and copper-64, to visualize the distribution of receptor overexpression in tumors. Internal metabolic radiotherapy is also used as a therapeutic strategy (e.g., using yttrium-90, lutetium-177, and actinium-225). With some radiopharmaceuticals now used in clinical practice, somatostatin analogs developed for imaging and therapy are an example of the concept of personalized medicine with a theranostic approach. Here, we review the development of these analogs, from the well-established and authorized ones to the most recently developed radiotracers, which have better pharmacokinetic properties and demonstrate increased efficacy and safety, as well as the search for new clinical indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Eychenne
- UPS, CNRS, SPCMIB (Laboratoire de Synthèse et Physico-Chimie de Molécules d’Intérêt Biologique)—UMR 5068, Université de Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse, France; (R.E.); (E.B.)
- Groupement d’Intérêt Public ARRONAX, 1 Rue Aronnax, F-44817 Saint Herblain, France;
- CNRS, CRCINA (Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes—Angers)—UMR 1232, ERL 6001, Inserm, Université de Nantes, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Christelle Bouvry
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, F-35000, France;
- CNRS, ISCR (Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes)—UMR 6226, Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Mickael Bourgeois
- Groupement d’Intérêt Public ARRONAX, 1 Rue Aronnax, F-44817 Saint Herblain, France;
- CNRS, CRCINA (Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes—Angers)—UMR 1232, ERL 6001, Inserm, Université de Nantes, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Pascal Loyer
- INRAE, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer)—UMR_A 1341, UMR_S 1241, Inserm, Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France;
| | - Eric Benoist
- UPS, CNRS, SPCMIB (Laboratoire de Synthèse et Physico-Chimie de Molécules d’Intérêt Biologique)—UMR 5068, Université de Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse, France; (R.E.); (E.B.)
| | - Nicolas Lepareur
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, F-35000, France;
- INRAE, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer)—UMR_A 1341, UMR_S 1241, Inserm, Univ Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France;
| |
Collapse
|