Chemotherapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium

The long-term outcome of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 1969 patients

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and investigate prognostic factors for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as the role of NSS for UTUC remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with organ-localized UTUC between 2004 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score overlap weighting (PSOW) process, Cox regression analysis, Kaplan‒Meier analysis, competing-risks models, and subgroup analysis were employed to compare the outcomes and identify prognostic factors. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms were developed and evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.

RESULTS

A total of 1969 patients were included. After the process of PSOW, baseline data were well balanced. RNU was associated with similar OS and CSS than NSS in the overall cohort. Age, T stage, and histologic grade were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, while marital status was an independent prognostic factor only for OS. Four and three predictors were identified for developing the OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. C-index (OS 0.637, CSS 0.670), calibration curve, and Kaplan-Meier analysis proved excellent predictive accuracy of nomograms.

CONCLUSION

Patients accepting RNU had a comparative or better outcome in each sample group. NSS achieved a similar oncologic control for selected patients with organ-localized UTUC.

Is Segmental Ureterectomy Associated with Inferior Survival for Localized Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma of the Ureter Compared to Radical Nephroureterectomy?

Segmental ureterectomy (SU) is an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in the treatment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the ureter. SU generally preserves renal function, at the expense of less intensive cancer control. We aim to assess whether SU is associated with inferior survival compared to RNU. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed with localized UTUC of the ureter between 2004-2015. We used a propensity-score-overlap-weighted (PSOW) multivariable survival model to compare survival following SU vs. RNU. PSOW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and we performed a non-inferiority test of overall survival. A population of 13,061 individuals with UTUC of the ureter receiving either SU or RNU was identified; of these, 9016 underwent RNU and 4045 SU. Factors associated with decreased likelihood of receiving SU were female gender (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88; p < 0.001), advanced clinical T stage (cT4) (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.88; p = 0.015), and high-grade tumor (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86; p < 0.001). Age greater than 79 years was associated with increased probability of undergoing SU (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38; p = 0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between SU and RNU (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04; p = 0.538). SU was not inferior to RNU in PSOW-adjusted Cox regression analysis (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). In weighted cohorts of individuals with UTUC of the ureter, the use of SU was not associated with inferior survival compared to RNU. Urologists should continue to utilize SU in appropriately selected patients.

Urinary Metabolic Markers of Bladder Cancer: A Reflection of the Tumor or the Response of the Body?

This work will review the metabolic information that various studies have obtained in recent years on bladder cancer, with particular attention to discovering biomarkers in urine for the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease. In principle, they would be capable of complementing cystoscopy, an invasive but nowadays irreplaceable technique or, in the best case, of replacing it. We will evaluate the degree of reproducibility that the different experiments have shown in the indication of biomarkers, and a synthesis will be attempted to obtain a consensus list that is more likely to become a guideline for clinical practice. In further analysis, we will inquire into the origin of these dysregulated metabolites in patients with bladder cancer. For this purpose, it will be helpful to compare the imbalances measured in urine with those known inside tumor cells or tissues. Although the urine analysis is sometimes considered a liquid biopsy because of its direct contact with the tumor in the bladder wall, it contains metabolites from all organs and tissues of the body, and the tumor is separated from urine by the most impermeable barrier found in mammals. The distinction between the specific and systemic responses can help understand the disease and its consequences in more depth.

Modification of Platinum-based Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With Suboptimal Renal Function

BACKGROUND/AIM

Standard chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients with moderate renal dysfunction has not yet been established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed outcomes of patients with advanced UC who underwent first-line chemotherapy with full-/reduced-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC-f/GC-r) or full-/reduced-dose gemcitabine plus carboplatin (G-Car-f/G-Car-r) according to renal function.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in this study. The objective response rate was 42%, 30%, 42%, and 27% for the GC-f, GC-r, G-Car-f, and G-Car-r groups, respectively. For the GC-r and G-Car-f groups, the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival was 4.5 vs. 7.0 months (p=0.07) and 7.5 months vs. 12.0 months (p=0.124), respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in the GC-r group than the G-Car-f group (80% vs. 38%, p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

G-Car-f could be more beneficial than GC-r for patients with advanced UC who have moderate renal dysfunction.

A comparison of nephrotoxicity between patients with a solitary-functioning kidney and those with bilateral-functioning kidneys in cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a Japanese retrospective multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

To compare the prevalence of nephrotoxicity between patients with a solitary-functioning kidney versus those with bilateral-functioning kidneys during the administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 244 advanced urothelial carcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy between 2004 and 2010 at 17 institutes in Japan. The 24 h creatinine clearance, Cockcroft-Gault formula, and estimated glomerular filtration rate equation (eGFR), were compared before all chemotherapies. The urinary tract function status was determined based on the data of nephroureterectomy, hydronephrosis, and relief of upper urinary tract obstruction. A total of 244 patients were divided into four groups according to their urinary tract functioning status and eGFR results, including bilateral-functioning kidneys with pretreatment eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² group (n = 83, 34.0%); a solitary-functioning kidney with pretreatment eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² group (n = 36, 14.8%); bilateral-functioning kidneys with pretreatment eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² group (n = 45, 18.4%); and a solitary-functioning kidney with pretreatment eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² group (n = 80, 32.8%).

RESULTS

The prevalence of nephrotoxicity with impaired eGFR of > 10% and 30% from baseline in the post-third-course of chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients with bilateral-functioning kidneys than in those with a solitary-functioning kidney, among patients with pretreatment eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.023 and p = 0.026). During all courses of chemotherapy, the prevalence of nephrotoxicity with impaired eGFR of > 20% from baseline were significantly higher in patients with bilateral-functioning kidneys than those with a solitary-functioning kidney among patients with pretreatment eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.034), whereas no significant difference was observed among patients with pretreatment eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m².

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that cisplatin-based chemotherapy may have more nephrotoxicity in patients with bilateral-functioning kidneys than in those with a solitary-functioning kidney.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety study of cabazitaxel in adult cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function

PURPOSE

Limited data are available on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment. This open-label, multicenter study assessed cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal or impaired renal function.

METHODS

Cohorts A (normal renal function: creatinine clearance [CrCL] >80 mL/min/1.73 m²), B (moderate renal impairment: CrCL 30 to <50 mL/min/1.73 m²) and C (severe impairment: CrCL <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) received cabazitaxel 25 mg/m² (A, B) or 20 mg/m² (C, could be escalated to 25 mg/m²), once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters and cabazitaxel unbound fraction (F _U) were assessed using linear regression and mixed models. Geometric mean (GM) and GM ratios (GMRs) were determined using mean CrCL intervals (moderate and severe renal impairment: 40 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m²) versus a control (90 mL/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

Overall, 25 patients received cabazitaxel (median cycles: 3 [range 1-20]; Cohort A: 5 [2-13]; Cohort B: 3 [1-15]; and Cohort C: 5 [1-20]), of which 24 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight in each cohort). For moderate and severe renal impairment versus normal renal function, GMR estimates were: clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) 0.95 (90% CI 0.80-1.13) and 0.89 (0.61-1.32); area under the curve normalized to dose (AUC/dose) 1.06 (0.88-1.27) and 1.14 (0.76-1.71); and F _U 0.99 (0.94-1.04) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09), respectively. Estimated slopes of linear regression of log parameters versus log CrCL (renal impairment) were: CL/BSA 0.06 (-0.15 to 0.28); AUC/dose -0.07 (-0.30 to 0.16); and F _U 0.02 (-0.05 to 0.08). Cabazitaxel safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics.

Impact of acute kidney injury defined by CTCAE v4.0 during first course of cisplatin-based chemotherapy on treatment outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group (KDIGO) defined acute kidney injury (AKI) as an elevation of serum creatinine (sCR) exceeding 0.3 mg/dl within 48 h. The widely used adverse events criteria for chemotherapy, Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0), also defined AKI as sCR exceeding 0.3 mg/dl, but with no provision of a time course. Here, we attempted to clarify the impact of AKI (CTCAE v4.0) during cisplatin-based chemotherapy on clinical outcome of patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 230 UC patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

During the first chemotherapy course, AKI (CTCAE v4.0) episodes were observed in 61 patients (26.5 %), whereas only four patients (1.5 %) experienced AKI (KDIGO) episodes. Both the pretreatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault formula were not efficient predictors for the development of AKI (CTCAE v4.0). AKI (CTCAE v4.0) impacted renal function: at the start of second-course chemotherapy, the average eGFR of the patients with AKI (CTCAE v4.0) was 54.1 ml/min/1.73 m², significantly lower than that of patients without AKI (CTCAE v4.0) (63.4 ml/min/1.73 m²). As a result, only 57.4 % of patients with AKI (CTCAE v4.0) received the planned treatment at the second course. The survival of the patients who developed AKI (CTCAE v4.0) was significantly worse than that of the patients who did not. The 3-year OSs were 10.3 and 21.4 %, respectively (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that AKI (CTCAE v4.0) during chemotherapy had a negative impact on both the intensity of subsequent chemotherapy and oncological outcomes.

Pelvic exenteration for advanced malignancy in elderly patients

Background

Pelvic exenteration is an aggressive surgical procedure reserved for highly selected patients. Surgery in the elderly is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to review outcomes following exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancy in this subgroup of patients.

Methods

All patients aged 70 years and over who underwent pelvic exenteration between 1999 and 2014 were included in the study. This comprised all primary rectal, gynaecological and bladder tumours. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality.

Results

A total of 94 patients were included, with a median age of 76 (range 70–90) years. There were 65 rectal, 20 gynaecological and nine bladder tumours. The administration of neoadjuvant therapy was significantly different among tumour types (P = 0·002). A total of 32 patients (34 per cent) developed postoperative complications, and there were six deaths (6 per cent) within 30 days of surgery. Median survival was 64 months for patients with rectal cancer, 30 months for those with gynaecological tumours and 15 months for those with bladder cancer. Five-year survival rates in these groups were 47, 31 and 22 per cent respectively (P = 0·023).

Conclusion

Given the possibility of long-term survival, pelvic exenteration should not be withheld on the grounds of advanced age alone.

Impact of renal function of patients with advanced urothelial cancer on eligibility for first-line chemotherapy and treatment outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to clarify the clinical effects of first-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced urothelial cancer on clinical responses and survival of patients grouped by renal function.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 345 urothelial cancer patients received systemic chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable disease in 17 centers (2004-10).

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-one patients were treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin/methotrexate, epirubicin and cisplatin (n = 136) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (n = 105) followed by carboplatin-based treatments, non-platinum treatments or other regimens. After 2008, gemcitabine and cisplatin was the most frequently used regimen in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and in those with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The gemcitabine and cisplatin patients' complete response rate was 10.5% and their response rate was 52.4%, which was highest among all regimens. Gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated a better 3-year overall survival when the estimated glomerular filtration rate was ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (31.4%), but it tended to be worse when the estimated glomerular filtration rate was < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (14.1%). In the latter cases, the dose reduction rate of gemcitabine and cisplatin was high (43.9%). Among the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the 1-year overall survival of the patients treated with a reduced dose of gemcitabine and cisplatin was significantly lower than that of those treated with standard-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin (26.2 vs. 60.3%, respectively, P = 0.0108).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and cisplatin provided favorable responses and survival in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) but unsatisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), especially when treated with a reduced dose. Alternative regimens might be optimal rather than reduced-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2).

Gemcitabine plus split-dose cisplatin could be a promising alternative to gemcitabine plus carboplatin for cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-based chemotherapies are standard treatment regimens of advanced urothelial cell carcinoma. But a significant proportion of patients are unsuitable for cisplatin due to impaired renal function. Carboplatin-based regimens such as gemcitabine and carboplatin regimen (GCb) were applied due to less nephrotoxicity and side effects in these patients. However, it is known that clinical outcome of carboplatin-based regimens was unsatisfactory compared to cisplatin-based regimens. We compared the nephrotoxicity and response to treatment between GCb and gemcitabine plus split-dose cisplatin regimen (GC-S).

METHODS

GC-S consists of cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) given on day 1, 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks. GCb consists of carboplatin (AUC 4.5) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1, 8 every 3 weeks. Patient demographics, serum creatinine and calculated GFR, adverse events, and radiologic response were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with GCb (n = 22) or GC-S (n = 22) in our institution. There was no difference at deterioration of serum creatinine or GFR between GCb and GC-S (p = 0.442, p = 0.345). For patients who had GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) subgroup, similar results were produced (p = 0.292, p = 0.186). In addition, GC-S (68.4 %) showed improved response compared to GCb (31.6 %) (p = 0.023). Both treatments were well tolerated, and there were no unexpected serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on preserved renal function, favorable response, and tolerability, GC-S could be a promising alternative to GCb for cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Predictive factors for impaired renal function following nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Despite the uncertain value of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) it is clear that impaired renal function represents a contraindication to its administration. The objective of this study was to identify possible predictive clinical factors for impaired renal function following RNU in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 546 patients who underwent RNU between 1992 and 2008 at our institution. Data of interest for this study included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, pathological stage and preoperative hydronephrosis (HN). The predictive value of HN, age and pathological stage for impaired renal function after RNU was calculated by multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients met the criteria for inclusion, including 108 men (78%). Mean age at surgery was 67 ± 10 years. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between pre- and postoperative eGFR (decrease of 21% after NU). Preoperative HN was present in 51 patients (37%). On linear regression analysis, preoperative eGFR ≤60 ml/min (p = 0.012; OR = 4.60) and HN (p = 0.027; OR = 10.34) were confirmed to be predictive factors for a postoperative eGFR ≤60 ml/min. When postoperative eGFR ≤45 ml/min was used as the criterion for impaired renal function, predictive factors proved to be preoperative eGFR ≤45 ml/min (p < 0.0001; OR = 18.53), HN (p = 0.038; OR = 0.380) and age ≥70 years (p < 0.0001; OR = 0.169).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative HN, older age and preoperative eGFR <60 ml/min were proven to be predictive factors for impaired renal function after RNU. In these settings, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered.

Assessment and management of renal impairment in chemotherapy for urogenital cancer

The method of diagnosing chronic kidney disease by simple estimated glomerular filtration rate equations has demonstrated a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease among the genitourinary cancer patients. Approximately 30-50% of urothelial cancer patients have Grade 3 chronic kidney disease before chemotherapy, and the rate increases to around 80% in upper urinary tract cancer patients who have undergone radical surgery. Several gold-standard treatments, including cisplatin for urothelial/testicular tumors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for kidney cancers, are known to be associated with the development of renal impairment. However, which renal function assessments are best to select a chemotherapy regimen remain unknown. Most testicular tumor patients are cured by intensive combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, but chemotherapy can induce chronic kidney disease in testicular cancer survivors. The prevalence of Stage 3 chronic kidney disease among the testicular cancer survivors is between 10 and 20%. Thus, the estimated glomerular filtration rate assessment is a useful tool for monitoring the development of chronic kidney disease among the cancer survivors, and assessment of renal function is mandatory before the treatment of these genitourinary cancer patients.

[Chemotherapy in unfit bladder cancer patients]

Bladder cancer often occurs in patients with high risk of acute toxicity under chemotherapy. So-called unfit patients are a heterogenous population, sharing a contra-indication for cisplatin and presenting either chronic renal failure, and/or elderly, and/or altered performance status, and/or severe co-morbidities. Therefore, it is necessary to develop chemotherapy protocols feasible in renal insufficient patients, and well tolerated in frail patients. The medical evaluation prior to initiate chemotherapy is of major importance to screen for chronic disorders and to anticipate the potential acute complications following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy of elderly patients with severe comorbidities is a common situation in bladder cancer, and will concern all cancer patients. The evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio of the chemotherapy protocol is a typical expertise of medical oncologists, which requires to integrate the complex links between the patient, the antitumor agent, and toxicity. The physician must also have a honest dialogue to inform, advise, listen to the patients priorities. Medical oncologists have to have in mind this situation and to adapt their clinic and their vocabulary to this emerging reality.

Management of bladder cancer: current and emerging strategies

Cancer of the urinary bladder is the fifth most prevalent solid tumour in the US. Urothelial carcinoma is the most common form of bladder cancer, accounting for about 90% of cases. About 25% of patients with bladder cancer have advanced disease (muscle-invasive or metastatic disease) at presentation and are candidates for systemic chemotherapy. Urothelial carcinoma is a chemo-sensitive disease, with a high overall and complete response rate to combination chemotherapy. In the setting of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with overall survival benefit. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting is yet to be validated. In the setting of metastatic disease, use of cisplatin-based regimens improves survival. However, despite initial high response rates, the responses are typically not durable leading to recurrence and death in the vast majority of these patients. Currently, there is no standard second-line therapy for patients in whom first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease has failed. Many newer chemotherapeutic agents have shown modest activity in urothelial carcinoma. Improved understanding of molecular biology and pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma has opened avenues for the use of molecularly targeted therapies, several of which are being tested in clinical trials. Currently, several novel drugs seem particularly promising including inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway, such as cetuximab, and inhibitors of tumour angiogenesis, such as bevacizumab and sunitinib. Development of reliable molecular predictive markers is expected to improve treatment decisions, therapy development and outcomes in urothelial carcinoma. Funding of and participation in clinical trials are key to advancing the care of urothelial cancer patients. Current and emerging strategies in the medical management of urothelial carcinoma are reviewed.