Management of inflammatory breast cancer: focus on radiotherapy with an evidence-based approach

Comprehensive Characterization of Immune Cell Infiltration Characteristics and Drug Sensitivity Analysis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Based on Bioinformatic Strategy

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and highly invasive form of breast cancer, renowned for its aggressive behavior, malignant capacity, and unfavorable prognosis. Despite considerable advancements in comprehending the underlying biology of IBC, the immune cell infiltration (ICI) profile in IBC remains inadequately elucidated. The current work endeavors to investigate the ICI characteristics of IBC and ascertain the pivotal immune cell subtypes and genes that impact its prognosis. The present study employed microarray data from the GEO database to demonstrate that IBC exhibited a lower abundance of activated mast cells (AMC) in comparison to non-inflammatory breast cancer (nIBC) or normal breast tissue (NBT). Additionally, the mRNA expression level of the gene polo-like kinase 5 (PLK5), which was correlated with AMC, was found to be lower in IBC relative to nIBC or NBT. Furthermore, this investigation provided compelling evidence indicating a potential association between a decreased mRNA expression level of PLK5 and a shorter progression-free survival in patients with breast cancer. The gene set enrichment analysis performed on PLK5 revealed that the gene expression in IBC was closely associated with diverse immune functions and pathways. Besides, a negative correlation has been established between PLK5 mRNA expression level and a majority of immune checkpoint-related genes, thereby suggesting the potential suitability of immunotherapy treatment for IBC. In summary, this study offers valuable insights into the ICI profile of IBC and identifies potential target PLK5 for improving its clinical management.

Radiation for inflammatory breast cancer: Updates

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a diagnosis based on a constellation of clinical features of edema (peau d'orange) of a third or more of the skin of the breast with a palpable border and a rapid onset of breast erythema. Incidence of IBC has increased over time, although it still makes up only 1-4% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Despite recent encouraging data on clinical outcomes, the published local-regional control rates remain consistently lower than the rates for non-IBC. In this review, we focus on radiotherapy, provide a framework for multi-disciplinary care for IBC, describe local-regional treatment techniques for IBC; highlight new directions in the management of patients with metastatic IBC and offer an introduction to future directions regarding the optimal treatment and management of IBC.

Clinical Response to Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Outcome after Combined-Modality Therapy in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To assess predictors of outcome in a cohort of Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by local treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 95 non-metastatic IBC patient files.

RESULTS

Complete clinical response (cCR) was obtained in 15 (16%) patients. Median follow up was 13.4 years (IC95%: 10.4-14.6). Loco-regional control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 85%, 41%, and 55%, respectively; cCR was associated with better DFS and OS in multivariate analyses adjusted for age (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical response to upfront chemotherapy predicts the outcome of patients affected by IBC.

Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.

Inflammatory breast cancer outcomes by breast cancer subtype: a population-based study

AIM

To assess the outcomes of breast cancer subtype in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed IBC patients from the SEER program.

RESULTS

We identified 626 patients, including 230 (36.7%),100 (17.6%), 113 (18.1%), and 173 (27.6%) patients with HoR+/HER2-, HoR+/HER2+, HoR-/HER2+, and HoR-/HER2- subtype disease, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, using HoR+/HER2- subtype as reference, patients with HoR+/HER2+ subtype had better breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), and patients with HoR-/HER2- subtype had worse BCSS and OS, while BCSS and OS were comparable for HoR-/HER2+ subtype. Similar trends were observed in patients who received surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or trimodality therapy.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer subtype is clinically useful for predicting survival outcome in IBC. The HoR+/HER2- subtype shows poorer survival outcome than HoR+/HER2+ subtype.

Outcomes of patients with inflammatory breast cancer by hormone receptor- and HER2-defined molecular subtypes: A population-based study from the SEER program

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), with emphasis on the role of molecular subtypes and radiotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study to investigate overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) in patients with IBC was conducted using data obtained by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2010–2013. Cox multivariate regression was used to calculate the adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR).

Results

403 patients were eligible for this study. Patients in the group with hormone receptors (HR)+/HER2- subtype had an OS of 79.6% compared with 89.0 % in the group with (HR)+/HER2+ subtype and 76.8% in the HR-/HER2+ group and 62.9% in the triple-negative (TN) group. BCSM was 16.3% for the HR+/HER2- group, 9.8% for the HR+/HER2+ group, 21.7% for the HR-/HER2+ group, and 30.5% for the TN group. For distant metastases, the results showed that there was a high probability of bone metastasis in HR-positive groups, brain and liver metastasis in HER2-positive groups, and lung metastasis in the TN group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that estrogen receptor and HER2 positivity were associated with better survival and that the TN subtype had a poorer OS and BCSM compared with other subtypes (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients who received radiotherapy were more likely to have improved survival (P< 0.05).

Conclusion

Inflammatory breast cancer appears to alter the prognosis in association with the receptor status and molecular subtypes. Radiotherapy was still considered to be a crucial treatment for patients with IBC.

[Radiation therapy in inflammatory breast cancer]

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer accounts for 1-5% of all breast cancers. It is associated with a poor prognosis, because of an increased risk to develop metastases in comparison with all breast malignancies. The treatment is multimodal. We have evaluated the role of radiotherapy: indications, techniques and impact for local control and overall survival.

METHOD

The series of the literature with more than 40 patients irradiated for inflammatory breast cancer published since 1995 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was always delivered first. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with local control and overall survival at 10 years of 63-92% and 51-64 respectively. Without surgery, local control was 65% and overal survival 38% at 10years. Results of concomitant radiochemotherapy were reported: the studies were heterogenous. Modalities of radiotherapy were detailed with respect to dose and fractionation, target-volumes and technical considerations (including bolus).

CONCLUSION

The multimodal strategy comprises systematically radiotherapy with an evaluation of tumor response to maximise resecability.

Inflammatory breast cancer: unique biological and therapeutic considerations

Through the concerted efforts of many patients, health-care providers, legislators, and other supporters, the past decade has seen the development of the first clinics dedicated to the care of patients with inflammatory breast cancer in the USA and other countries. Together with social networking, advocacy, and education, a few specialised centres have had substantial increases in patient numbers (in some cases ten times higher), which has further expanded the community of science and advocacy and increased the understanding of the disease process. Although inflammatory breast cancer is considered rare, constituting only 2-4% of breast cancer cases, poor prognosis means that patients with the disease account for roughly 10% of breast cancer mortality annually in the USA. I propose that the unique presentation of inflammatory breast cancer might require specific, identifiable changes in the breast parenchyma that occur before the tumour-initiating event. This would make the breast tissue itself a tumour-promoting medium that should be treated as a component of the pathology in multidisciplinary treatment and should be further studied for complementary targets to inhibit the pathobiology that is specific to inflammatory breast cancer.

DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer V: Therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, as well as local therapy in cases with synchronous distant metastases

AIM

The purpose of this work is to give practical guidelines for radiotherapy of locally advanced, inflammatory and metastatic breast cancer at first presentation.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey of the literature using the search phrases "locally advanced breast cancer", "inflammatory breast cancer", "breast cancer and synchronous metastases", "de novo stage IV and breast cancer", and "metastatic breast cancer" and "at first presentation" restricted to "clinical trials", "randomized trials", "meta-analysis", "systematic review", and "guideline" was performed and supplemented by using references of the respective publications. Based on the German interdisciplinary S3 guidelines, updated in 2012, this publication addresses indications, sequence to other therapies, target volumes, dose, and fractionation of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

International and national guidelines are in agreement that locally advanced, at least if regarded primarily unresectable and inflammatory breast cancer should receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy first, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. If surgery is not amenable after systemic therapy, radiotherapy is the treatment of choice followed by surgery, if possible. Surgery and radiotherapy should be administered independent of response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment. In patients with a de novo diagnosis of breast cancer with synchronous distant metastases, surgery and radiotherapy result in considerably better locoregional tumor control. An improvement in survival has not been consistently proven, but may exist in subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is an important part in the treatment of locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer that should be given to all patients regardless to the intensity and effect of neoadjuvant systemic treatment and the extent of surgery. Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with primarily distant metastatic disease should be prescribed on an individual basis.

Predictors of durable no evidence of disease status in de novo metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation

INTRODUCTION

Definitive locoregional therapy including surgery and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been offered to select IBC patients with de novo metastatic disease. Herein we examined predictive factors for progression-free survival after comprehensive PMRT radiation +/- locoregional treatment of metastatic sites.

METHODS

Charts of T4d, any N, M1 (de novo) patients who completed PMRT to ≥ 50 Gy from 2006-2011 were reviewed. Patients who received doses <50Gy to the primary site, received radiation at another facility or were treated pre-operatively were excluded. The remaining 36 patients formed the study cohort. Progression-free survival post-PMRT (PFSx) was assessed from the last day of radiation. Median dose to primary fields was 51 Gy. Boost doses ranged from 6-16 Gy.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 54 (range 33-70). Median follow up from primary irradiation completion was 31 months. Sixteen patients were Stage IV NED at last follow-up (IR 37-60 mo). Fifteen patients died of disease. Five patients experienced an in-field recurrence, three of which resulted from local recurrence at the medial edge of the field. Actuarial 5 year locoregional control (LRC) was 86%. Median PFSx was 20 months. All sites of gross disease were treated with radiation in 21/36 patients. Location of metastatic disease had no correlation with PFSx. Estrogen receptor (ER)- patients had shorter 5-yr actuarial PFSx (28% vs. 66%, P = 0.03) and 5 year actuarial OSx (37% vs 71%, P = 0.02). Nine patients (25%) developed a pathological complete response (pCR) after chemotherapy and with a median follow-up of 59 months, 7 remained without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the poor prognosis associated with metastatic IBC, our data suggest that select patients may be appropriate candidates for locoregional therapy. Patients who achieve a pCR or those with ER + disease have a favorable PFSx. It remains unclear whether all gross disease needs to be addressed with locoregional therapy to provide benefit.

Radiation therapy for inflammatory breast cancer: technical considerations and diverse clinical scenarios

SUMMARY Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is associated with unique skin findings at presentation, diffuse spread and poorer outcomes compared with non-IBC. Standard of care when metastatic disease is not present at diagnosis includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated reasonable local control using varying aggressive approaches that will be reviewed and technical considerations that will be discussed. In general, the existing contemporary data support an aggressive locoregional approach in IBC. The morbidity of extensive locoregional recurrence in IBC merits aggressive efforts in prevention in high-risk metastatic cases. Our large, single-institutional experience suggests that contralateral disease and extension to second echelon nodal stations may still represent curable disease amenable to aggressive locoregional therapy in some cases. Examining 13 IBC cases where contralateral involved nodal basins were treated with radiotherapy with or without surgery at the time of ipsilateral locoregional therapy, four ER-positive patients presented evidence of disease at the last follow-up. Examining 36 patients with metastatic IBC involving any M1 site who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy and postmastectomy radiotherapy similarly revealed that a long-term status of no evidence of disease is achievable in some M1 IBC patients treated with effective systemic therapy and aggressive locoregional therapy. Actuarial 5-year overall survival in this M1 cohort was 54%. Radiotherapy for clinical circumstances including extended regional (M1) disease, palliation of diffuse skin metastases, reirradiation and inoperable IBC will be discussed.