A contemporary update on rates and management of toxicities of targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal toxicity of targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma in patients with normal and impaired kidney function

The introduction of novel targeted therapies during the last 2 decades has led to a significant improvement in patients' clinical outcomes with renal cell carcinoma. However, this improvement came at the price of a whole new spectrum of adverse events, including renal toxicity. Systemic treatment of patients with kidney neoplasms who often present with impairment of kidney function, even prior to treatment, poses an increasing diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Common lifestyle-related comorbidities, i.e., hypertension and diabetes, may contribute to further impairment of kidney function. The lack of official guidelines and the exclusion of patients with reduced kidney function from the clinical trials of recently approved drugs complicate the issue even further. Early detection and correct management of renal toxic effects are crucial to preserve kidney function and ensure the optimal administration of life-prolonging therapies. This review presents detailed information on the renal toxicities of three groups of drugs commonly used in renal cell carcinoma treatment: tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We outline the incidence and underlying mechanisms of renal adverse effects with a focus on patients on renal replacement therapy, as well as present suggestions for their management.

Thoracic Manifestations of Genitourinary Neoplasms and Treatment-related Complications

Genitourinary (GU) malignancies are a diverse group of common and uncommon neoplasms that may be associated with significant mortality. Metastases from GU neoplasms are frequently encountered in the chest, and virtually all thoracic structures can be involved. Although the most common imaging manifestations include hematogenous dissemination manifesting with peripheral predominant bilateral pulmonary nodules and lymphatic metastases manifesting with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, some GU malignancies exhibit unique features. We review the general patterns, pathways, and thoracic imaging features of renal, adrenal, urothelial, prostatic, and testicular metastatic neoplasms, as well as provide a discussion of treatment-related complications that might manifest in the chest. Detailed reporting of these patterns will allow the imager to assist the referring clinicians and surgeons in accurate determination of the stage, prognosis, and treatment options available for the patient. Awareness of specific treatment-related complications further allows the imager to enhance patient safety through accurate and timely reporting of potentially life-threatening consequences of therapies.

Pazopanib: Evidence review and clinical practice in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Background

Pazopanib is indicated in the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). The aim of this study was to review the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib and see how these aspects are linked to clinical practice.

Methods

A non-exhaustive systematic review was conducted according to the three topics. No publication restrictions were imposed and the selected languages were Spanish and English. After that, a summary of the main results and findings of the review was presented and discussed during three meetings (one for each topic) with 13 medical oncologists that usually treat mRCC. At these meetings, a questionnaire on the first-line use of pazopanib in clinical practice was also drawn up. After the meetings, the questionnaire was completed by 60 specialist medical oncologists in renal cancer.

Results

The efficacy and safety of pazopanib have been demonstrated in several clinical trials, and subsequently confirmed in studies in real-world clinical practice. In addition to its clinical benefit and good safety profile, quality of life results for pazopanib, which compare favorably to sunitinib, make it a good option in the first-line treatment of patients. Special populations have been included in studies conducted with pazopanib, and it is safe for use in elderly patients, poor functional status, kidney failure, and mild or moderate hepatic impairment, and in patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease. The results of the questionnaire have shown that pazopanib is perceived as an effective drug, in which quality of life (QoL) outcomes are valued above all.

Conclusions

This paper offers a comprehensive and critical summary of efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in the treatment of mRCC. Pazopanib is an effective treatment with an acceptable safety profile. Its QoL and tolerability results offer certain advantages when compared with other therapeutic alternatives, and its use appears to be safe in different patient profiles.

Recent Advances in the Development of Indazole-based Anticancer Agents

Cancer is one of the leading causes of human mortality globally; therefore, intensive efforts have been made to seek new active drugs with improved anticancer efficacy. Indazole-containing derivatives are endowed with a broad range of biological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anti-HIV, antihypertensive, and anticancer activities. In recent years, the development of anticancer drugs has given rise to a wide range of indazole derivatives, some of which exhibit outstanding activity against various tumor types. The aim of this review is to outline recent developments concerning the anticancer activity of indazole derivatives, as well as to summarize the design strategies and structure-activity relationships of these compounds.

Second-Line Treatment Landscape for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

The management of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma has steadily improved over the past decade with the introduction of antiangiogenic and targeted therapies. Recently, three new therapies have been approved for use as second-line options that further advance the treatment armamentarium: nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the programmed cell death receptor; cabozantinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), MET, and AXL; and lenvatinib, a small-molecule TKI of VEGF and fibroblast growth factor receptors that is used in combination with everolimus, an inhibitor of the mechanistic target of rapamycin. Together, these and previously approved second-line treatments offer clinicians the ability to better individualize treatment for patients after progression on first-line VEGFR-targeted therapies. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the efficacy and safety results from the pivotal trials of these newly approved therapies, including the quality of study design, the level of evidence, subgroup analyses, and how these data can help to guide clinicians to select the most appropriate second-line therapy for their patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This review article provides the reader with a comprehensive overview of current treatment options for patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) whose disease has progressed after their first therapy. As many patients with RCC experience disease progression with initial treatments, effective second-line therapies are critical. Nivolumab, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib plus everolimus have recently been approved as second-line treatments. The new agents discussed in this review increase the therapeutic options available and provide physicians with opportunities to individualize treatments for their patients, with a view to improving disease control and survival outcomes.

Changes in Renal Function of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma During Treatment with Molecular-Targeted Agents

BACKGROUND

Impairment of renal function is a serious issue that should be considered in patients undergoing treatment with molecular-targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

AIMS

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of molecular-targeted therapy on changes in renal function among patients with mRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 408 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, everolimus and/or temsirolimus. Among these, 185, 128 and 95 received molecular-targeted agents as first-line (group 1), second-line (group 2) and third-line (group 3) therapy, respectively.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and that at the end of molecular-targeted therapy were noted among the three groups of patients. In addition, there were no significant differences between eGFR prior to the introduction of molecular-targeted therapy and that at the end of therapy across agents and lines of targeted therapy, with the exception of patients treated with axitinib and everolimus in second-line and third-line therapy, respectively. In group 1, a reduction in eGFR of >10 % from baseline was independently associated with performance status, hypertension and treatment duration, while in groups 2 and 3, only treatment duration was independently related to a reduction in eGFR of >10 %.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that renal function in patients with mRCC is not markedly impaired by molecular-targeted therapies, irrespective of the specific agents introduced; however, it may be necessary to pay special attention to deterioration in renal function when molecular-targeted therapy is continued for longer periods.

The Inverse Association between the Baseline Renal Function and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Molecular-Targeted Agents

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the baseline renal function in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with molecular-targeted agents.

Patients and Methods

This study included 408 consecutive mRCC patients receiving molecular-targeted therapy, consisting of 124 patients in group A and 284 patients in group B who had baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m² and < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively.

Results

Compared with group A, group B was significantly less likely to have poor prognostic factors, such as a high proportion of patients without nephrectomy. The median overall survivals (OSs) after the initiation of targeted therapy in groups A and B were 21.4 and 35.8 months, respectively, and there was a significant difference in the OS between the 2 groups. However, multivariate analysis showed a lack of independent impact of the baseline renal function on the OS. Furthermore, when patients without a nephrectomy were excluded, no significant difference was noted in the OS between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that there was no adverse impact of an unfavorable baseline renal function on the efficacy of targeted agents against mRCC. Thus, molecular-targeted therapy should not be avoided in mRCC patients with an impaired baseline renal function.

Otorhinolaryngological Toxicities of New Drugs in Oncology

Many new or relatively new cancer drugs-personalized anticancer agents-have been approved for use in various clinical settings in oncology or are still under evaluation in clinical trials. Targeted therapies as well as new immune checkpoint blockers have toxicity profiles that differ from conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, and many can cause adverse effects that affect the mouth and pharynx, the nasal cavities, and the larynx. This review aims to provide an overview of current knowledge concerning these side effects and contemporary management. Adverse effects of the mouth/pharynx, nasal cavities, larynx, and cochlear-vestibular system are generally low grade (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and generally present non-life-threatening symptoms. However, the impact on patients' quality of life could be important. The incidence and severity vary according to the drug, its target(s), and dose, but there are currently no known predictive factors, and each patient has an individual toxicity profile. Management guidelines are based on expert opinion. These ear, nose, and throat adverse effects are not frequently mentioned in the literature because of the often non-specific nature of the symptoms and their mildness, but also the absence of specific treatment. These symptoms can contribute to decreased quality of life and lead to drug compliance issues if not diagnosed and managed appropriately.

Pharmacogenomic Markers of Targeted Therapy Toxicity in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy (TT) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may be associated with a high rate of toxicity that undermines treatment efficacy and patient quality of life. Polymorphisms in genes involved in the pharmacokinetic pathways of TTs may predict toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three core genes involved in the metabolism and transport of sunitinib and the mTOR inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus are associated with adverse events (AEs).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Germline DNA was extracted from blood or normal kidney tissue from mRCC patients of Caucasian ethnicity in two cohorts treated with either sunitinib (n=159) or mTOR inhibitors (n=62). Six SNPs in three candidate genes (CYP3A4: rs2242480, rs4646437, and rs2246709; CYP3A5: rs15524; and ABCB1: rs2032582 and rs1045642) were analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary endpoints were grade ≥3 AEs for all patients; grade ≥3 hypertension in the sunitinib cohort, and any grade pneumonitis in the mTOR inhibitors cohort. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between SNPs and AEs, with adjustment for relevant clinical factors.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 221 samples were successfully genotyped for the selected SNPs. In the sunitinib cohort, the CYP3A4 rs464637 AG variant was associated with a lower risk of high-grade AEs (odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.88; p=0.03), but no SNPs were associated with hypertension. In the mTOR inhibitor cohort, none of the selected SNPs was associated with analyzed toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an association between CYP3A4 polymorphisms and toxicity outcomes in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib, but not with everolimus or temsirolimus. Our findings are exploratory in nature, and further validation in independent and larger cohorts is needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found that variants of CYP3A4, a gene involved in drug metabolism, are associated with sunitinib toxicity. This information may help in better selection of patients for targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Impact on clinical practice of the implementation of guidelines for the toxicity management of targeted therapies in kidney cancer. The protect-2 study

Background

The impact of such recommendations after their implementation of guidelines has not usually been evaluated. Herein, we assessed the impact and compliance with the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) Guidelines for toxicity management of targeted therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in daily clinical practice.

Methods

Data on 407 mRCC patients who initiated first-line targeted therapy during the year before and the year after publication and implementation of the SOGUG guideline program were available from 34 Spanish Hospitals. Adherence to SOGUG Guidelines was assessed in every cycle.

Results

Adverse event (AE) management was consistent with the Guidelines as a whole for 28.7 % out of 966 post-implementation cycles compared with 23.1 % out of 892 pre-implementation cycles (p = 0.006). Analysis of adherence by AE in non-compliant cycles showed significant changes in appropriate management of hypertension (33 % pre-implementation vs. 44.5 % post-implementation cycles; p < 0.0001), diarrhea (74.0 % vs. 80.5 %; p = 0.011) and dyslipemia (25.0 % vs. 44.6 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Slight but significant improvements in AE management were detected following the implementation of SOGUG recommendations. However, room for improvement in the management of AEs due to targeted agents still remains and could be the focus for further programs in this direction.

Everolimus Versus Temsirolimus in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Progression With Previous Systemic Therapies

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is an approved agent for use after disease progression with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. With recently published trials showing efficacy of nivolumab and cabozantinib in the second-line therapy setting, the use of everolimus will likely move to the third- or fourth-line therapy setting. Temsirolimus has occasionally been used instead of everolimus for many reasons, including financial considerations, assurance of patient compliance given its intravenous administration, its toxicity profile, patient performance status, and patient or physician preference. However, efficacy of everolimus and temsirolimus in this setting have not been compared in a randomized trial. The results from retrospective studies have been inconsistent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients treated with a first-line VEGFR-TKI for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and then treated with either everolimus or temsirolimus on progression from the databases of 2 large academic cancer centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the initiation of second-line treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients received either everolimus (n = 59; 66%) or temsirolimus (n = 31; 34%) after progression during first-line VEGFR-TKI therapy. The patient and disease characteristics were similar in both groups. The median PFS was not different, but OS was superior with everolimus compared with temsirolimus (24.2 months vs. 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .047).

CONCLUSION

Our results bolster existing guidelines supporting everolimus over temsirolimus as salvage therapy after previous systemic therapies.

Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Several adverse events (AEs) are known to be commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. However, no significant correlation appears present in the profiles of such AEs between first- and second-line TKI therapies. Therefore, a second-line targeted agent for patients with mRCC could be selected irrespective of the AE profile during first-line TKI therapy.

BACKGROUND

Several adverse events (AEs) commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the appearance of such AEs during treatment with first-line TKIs significantly affects the occurrence of AEs during second-line TKI therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study included 154 consecutive patients with mRCC treated with second-line TKIs after the discontinuation of first-line TKIs. The association of AEs, including diarrhea, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and hypothyroidism, between first- and second-line therapies was analyzed in these 154 patients.

RESULTS

For all 5 AEs assessed in the present study, the proportion of patients experiencing AEs or those grade ≥ 3 during second-line TKI therapy was not significantly different among the following 3 groups: patients without AEs, those with grade ≤ 2 AEs, and those with grade ≥ 3 AEs during first-line TKI therapy. Furthermore, no significant difference was seen in progression-free or overall survival after the introduction of second-line TKIs between patients with and without grade ≥ 3 AEs during treatment with first-line TKIs.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of AEs or grade ≥ 3 AEs during second-line TKI therapy are not dependent on the profiles of AEs during first-line TKI therapy in patients with mRCC. Therefore, AEs that occur during first-line TKI therapy should not affect the selection of second-line targeted agents for patients with mRCC.

Metabolic disorders associated with the use of targeted cancer therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The everyday use of targeted therapies, whose mechanisms of action differ from the conventional cytotoxic agents, also causes the emergence of new toxicities as metabolic disorders about which little is known. We propose a systematic literature review of the incidence and physiopathology of targeted therapies-induced metabolic disorders and provide some management guidance.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent decades, significant breakthroughs in molecular oncology and immunology have been made. The administration of targeted therapies and immunotherapy has been associated with metabolic toxicities such as endocrine disorders, dyslipidemia, induced diabetes, and electrolytic disorders. Current data show that metabolic disorders are becoming increasingly common, but rarely life threatening and often reversible with prompt therapeutic intervention.

SUMMARY

In the era of targeted therapies, medical oncologists should know the symptoms, carefully monitor patients for potential metabolic disorders, and manage these emerging side-effects with the help of endocrinologists and other medical specialists.

In comparative analysis of multi-kinase inhibitors for targeted medulloblastoma therapy pazopanib exhibits promising in vitro and in vivo efficacy

Regardless of the recent advances in cytotoxic therapies, 30% of children diagnosed with medulloblastoma. succumb to the disease. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are warranted. Here we demonstrate that Pazopanib a clinically approved multi-kinase angiogenesis inhibitor (MKI) inhibits proliferation and apoptosis in medulloblastoma cell lines. Moreover, Pazopanib profoundly attenuates medulloblastoma cell migration, a prerequisite for tumor invasion and metastasis. In keeping with the observed anti-neoplastic activity of Pazopanib, we also delineate reduced phosphorylation of the STAT3 protein, a key regulator of medulloblastoma proliferation and cell survival. Finally, we document profound in vivo activity of Pazopanib in an orthotopic mouse model of the most aggressive c-myc amplified human medulloblastoma variant. Pazopanib reduced the growth rate of intracranial growing medulloblastoma and significantly prolonged the survival. Furthermore, to put these results into a broader perspective we analysed Pazopanib side by side with the MKI Sorafenib. Both compounds share a similar target profile but display different pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics with distinct cytotoxic activity in different tumor entities. Thus, we identified Pazopanib as a new promising candidate for a rational clinical assessment for targeted paediatric medulloblastoma therapy.

Strategies for the management of adverse events associated with mTOR inhibitors

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used as potent immunosuppressive agents in solid-organ transplant recipients (everolimus and sirolimus) and as antineoplastic therapies for various cancers (eg, advanced renal cell carcinoma; everolimus, temsirolimus, ridaforolimus). Relevant literature, obtained from specific PubMed searches, was reviewed to evaluate the incidence and mechanistic features of specific adverse events (AEs) associated with mTOR inhibitor treatment, and to present strategies to effectively manage these events. The AEs examined in this review include stomatitis and other cutaneous AEs, wound-healing complications (eg, lymphocele, incisional hernia), diabetes/hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, nephrotoxicity, delayed graft function, pneumonitis, anemia, hypertension, gonadal dysfunction, and ovarian toxicity. Strategies for selecting appropriate patients for mTOR inhibitor therapy and minimizing the risks of AEs are discussed, along with best practices for identifying and managing side effects. mTOR inhibitors are promising therapeutic options in immunosuppression and oncology; most AEs can be effectively detected and managed or reversed with careful monitoring and appropriate interventions.

Everolimus: side effect profile and management of toxicities in breast cancer

Everolimus is an orally available inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which has been approved in combination with exemestane for hormone receptor-positive (HR) breast cancer after failure of treatment with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. Everolimus is generally very well tolerated with most common side effects including stomatitis, rash, fatigue, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and myelosuppression. Most of these side effects are mild and resolve with dose interruptions or dose reductions. Symptomatic non-infectious pneumonitis is a relatively uncommon class effect of mTOR inhibitors, which can be life threatening. Given the efficacy of everolimus in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer, it is crucial for physicians to recognize toxicities related to everolimus and start timely interventions. This review will focus on the adverse events reported with everolimus in breast cancer trials and will provide practical guidelines for the management of these adverse events.