Safety of cranial radiotherapy concurrent with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A systematic review

Feasibility of Identifying Factors Related to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia in Real-World Data

A comprehensive view of factors associated with AD/ADRD will significantly aid in studies to develop new treatments for AD/ADRD and identify high-risk populations and patients for prevention efforts. In our study, we summarized the risk factors for AD/ADRD by reviewing existing meta-analyses and review articles on risk and preventive factors for AD/ADRD. In total, we extracted 477 risk factors in 10 categories from 537 studies. We constructed an interactive knowledge map to disseminate our study results. Most of the risk factors are accessible from structured Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and clinical narratives show promise as information sources. However, evaluating genomic risk factors using RWD remains a challenge, as genetic testing for AD/ADRD is still not a common practice and is poorly documented in both structured and unstructured EHRs. Considering the constantly evolving research on AD/ADRD risk factors, literature mining via NLP methods offers a solution to automatically update our knowledge map.

Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12)

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months.

RESULTS

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months.

CONCLUSION

The initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Perspectives on Brain Metastases: Moving Toward a Better Outlook for Patients

The diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been a dreaded, end-stage complication of systemic disease. Additionally, with the increasing effectiveness of systemic therapies that prolong life expectancy and improved imaging tools, the incidence of intracranial progression is becoming more common. Within this context, there has been increasing attention directed at understanding the molecular underpinnings of intracranial progression. Exploring the unique features of brain metastases compared with their extracranial counterparts to identify aberrant signaling pathways, which can be targeted pharmacologically, may help lead to new treatments for this patient population. Additionally, critical discoveries outside the sphere of the central nervous system are increasingly being applied to brain metastases with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibition, becoming a prevalent treatment option for patients with brain metastases across multiple histologies. As novel treatment strategies are considered, they require thoughtful incorporation of agents that can cross the blood-brain barrier and can synergize with pre-existing agents through rational combinations. Lastly, as clinicians and scientists continue to understand key molecular features of these tumors, they will continue to influence the treatment algorithms that are developing for the management of these patients. Due to the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with brain metastases, an emerging tool is the utilization of multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor boards to ensure optimal treatment decisions are made and that patients are provided access to applicable clinical trials. Looking to the future, the collective effort to understand the various tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that promote central nervous system seeding and propagation will have the potential to change the clinical trajectory for these patients.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: Dutch survey on current practice, knowledge and challenges

•

Radiotherapy referral during targeted therapy or immunotherapy occurs regularly.

•

There is a knowledge gap regarding the implications of combined therapy.

•

There is no consensus on expected toxicity of combined therapy.

•

Multidisciplinary protocols regarding combined therapy are often not available.

•

The application of radiotherapy treatment adaptations varies widely when combined with different systemic treatments.

Introduction

With the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and systemic antibodies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, the survival of advanced-stage cancer patients has improved for many tumor types. These patients are increasingly referred for radiotherapy, but it is unclear whether radiotherapy combined with these drugs is safe. No international guidelines exist on whether or how to combine these drugs with radiotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the current clinical practice in the Netherlands regarding hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients using targeted drugs and immunotherapy.

Materials and methods

We sent a survey to all 21 Dutch radiotherapy institutes. Dedicated radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and pulmonologists were asked to fill out the survey. The questions explored their familiarity with the combination of targeted drugs and immunotherapy with radiotherapy, the encountered clinical difficulties and factors influencing treatment decisions.

Results

The survey was filled out by 54 respondents from 19 different institutes. The median annual number of patients per radiation oncologist referred for radiotherapy when using targeted drugs or immunotherapy was 10 and 15, respectively. Despite this high number, only 11% of the radiation oncologists stated that they had sufficient information (resources) for adequate treatment decision making. Among all physicians, 44% stated that there was insufficient knowledge within their institute regarding this topic. Only 17% stated that there was a multidisciplinary protocol available. The application of radiotherapy treatment adaptations (technique, dose, fractionation, field size) varied widely. Generally, there seemed to be no consensus regarding the expected toxicity of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments and the expected risk of tumor flare upon temporary drug discontinuation.

Conclusion

There is no consensus amongst involved medical specialties on expected toxicity. Consequently, it is necessary to perform clinical studies examining the safety of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments, to add radiotherapy to phase I-III clinical trials for new drugs and to incorporate outcomes into multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines.

Under-recognized toxicities of cranial irradiation

Cranial irradiation of primary or metastatic lesions is frequent, historically with 3D-conformal radiation therapy and now with stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity modulation. Evolution of radiotherapy technique is concomitant to systemic treatment evolution permitting long time survival. Thus, physicians have to face underestimated toxicities on long-survivor patients and unknown toxicities from combination of cranial radiotherapy to new therapeutics as targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This article proposes to develop these toxicities, without being exhaustive, to allow a better apprehension of cranial irradiation in current context.

Effect of timing, technique and molecular features on brain control with local therapies in oncogene-driven lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The improved efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) mandates reappraisal of local therapy (LT) for brain metastases (BM) of oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included all epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR⁺, n = 108) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged (ALK⁺, n = 33) TKI-naive NSCLC patients diagnosed with BM in the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg between 2009 and 2019. Eighty-seven patients (62%) received early LT, while 54 (38%) received delayed (n = 34; 24%) or no LT (n = 20; 14%). LT comprised stereotactic (SRT; n = 40; 34%) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; n = 77; 66%), while neurosurgical resection was carried out in 19 cases.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) was 49.1 months for ALK⁺ and 19.5 months for EGFR⁺ patients (P = 0.001), with similar median intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS) (15.7 versus 14.0 months, respectively; P = 0.80). Despite the larger and more symptomatic BM (P < 0.001) of patients undergoing early LT, these experienced longer icPFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52; P = 0.024], but not OS (HR 1.63; P = 0.12), regardless of the radiotherapy technique (SRT versus WBRT) and number of lesions. High-risk oncogene variants, i.e. non-del19 EGFR mutations and 'short' EML4-ALK fusions (mainly variant 3, E6:A20), were associated with earlier intracranial progression (HR 2.97; P = 0.001). The longer icPFS with early LT was also evident in separate analyses of the EGFR⁺ and ALK⁺ subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preferential use for cases with poor prognostic factors, early LT prolongs the icPFS, but not OS, in TKI-treated EGFR⁺/ALK⁺ NSCLC. Considering the lack of survival benefit, and the neurocognitive effects of WBRT, patients presenting with polytopic BM may benefit from delaying radiotherapy, or from radiosurgery of multiple or selected lesions. For SRT candidates, the improved tumor control with earlier radiotherapy should be weighed against the potential toxicity and the enhanced intracranial activity of newer TKI. High-risk EGFR/ALK variants are associated with earlier intracranial failure and identify patients who could benefit from more aggressive management.

Systemic Therapy for Mutation-Driven NSCLC

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer have traditionally had a poor prognosis. An improved understanding of targetable oncogenic molecular alterations has led to a growing number of effective and first-line therapies in targeted patient populations. This review provides an overview of systemic therapy options available for patients with mutation-driven nonsmall cell lung cancer, as well as a discussion of data regarding safety when combined with radiation therapy.

EPHA2 Interacts with DNA-PKcs in Cell Nucleus and Controls Ionizing Radiation Responses in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells

Ephrin (EFN)/ Erythropoietin-producing human hepatocellular receptors (Eph) signaling has earlier been reported to regulate non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell survival and cell death as well as invasion and migration. Here, the role of Ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2) on the DNA damage response (DDR) signaling and ionizing radiation (IR) cellular effect was studied in NSCLC cells. Silencing of EphA2 resulted in IR sensitization, with increased activation of caspase-3, PARP-1 cleavage and reduced clonogenic survival. Profiling of EphA2 expression in a NSCLC cell line panel showed a correlation to an IR refractory phenotype. EphA2 was found to be transiently and rapidly phosphorylated at Ser897 in response to IR, which was paralleled with the activation of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK). Using cell fractionation, a transient increase in both total and pSer897 EphA2 in the nuclear fraction in response to IR was revealed. By immunoprecipitation and LC-MS/MS analysis of EphA2 complexes, nuclear localized EphA2 was found in a complex with DNA-PK_cs. Such complex formation rapidly increased after IR but returned back to basal level within an hour. Targeting EphA2 with siRNA or by treatment with EFNA1 ligand partly reduced phosphorylation of DNA-PK_cs at S2056 at early time points after IR. Thus, we report that EphA2 interacts with DNA-PK_cs in the cell nucleus suggesting a novel mechanism involving the EphA2 receptor in DDR signaling and IR responsiveness.

Central nervous system metastases and oligoprogression during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: how to treat and when?

Up to 70% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases during the course of their disease, especially those with oncogenic drivers treated with a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), because of the relatively poor CNS penetration. CNS metastases are associated with a negative impact on quality of life and survival. As, with the introduction of newer generation TKIs, the survival rates are increasing in this particular population, treatment and/or prevention of CNS metastases becomes even more relevant and the TKI with the best CNS efficacy should be selected. Unfortunately, CNS efficacy data in clinical trials are not fully comparable. Furthermore, oligoprogression to the brain without extracranial progression regularly occurs in the oncogenic driver population and both local therapy and switch of systemic therapy are possible treatment options. However, the best order of systemic and local therapy is still not precisely known. In this narrative review, we will summarize incidence and treatment of CNS metastases in oncogene driven NSCLC, including the optimal treatment of CNS oligometastatic disease (synchronous as well as oligoprogressive).

Apatinib and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of limited brain metastases from primary lung mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Apatinib is a novel anti-angiogenic agent that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, thereby inhibiting tumor angiogenesis, and is effective in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) and peritumoral brain edema (PTBE). There are no previous reports of combination therapy with apatinib and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for BM from primary lung mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 63-year-old man underwent left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection in April 2018.

DIAGNOSES

Postoperative pathology demonstrated high-grade MEC. The patient developed 3 BM with PTBE 3 months after undergoing surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received a combination of FSRT and apatinib (250-500 mg/d) as maintenance therapy.

OUTCOMES

The 3 BM showed nearly complete responses, and the PTBE areas shrank visibly. A new BM lesion occurred 7 months after the first FSRT and was treated with a second dose of FSRT. The patient developed extensive metastasis and atelectasis 9 months later. He died of pulmonary infection in December 2019. The overall survival time was 20 months.

LESSONS

Limited BM from primary lung MEC may be treated effectively with combination therapy with apatinib and FSRT when chemotherapy alone is not effective or tolerated. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with the treatment.

Risk factors for neurocognitive decline in lung cancer patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces brain metastasis incidence in lung cancer, however with risk of neurocognitive decline. Nevertheless, risk factors for neurocognitive decline after PCI remain unclear.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the PubMed database according to the PRISMA guideline. Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational/single arm trials evaluating PCI, including ≥20 patients, reporting neurocognitive test results for lung cancer. Primary aim: evaluate risk factors associated with neurocognitive decline after PCI.

RESULTS

Twenty records were eligible (8 different RCTs, 8 observational studies), including 3553 patients in total (858 NSCLC, 2695 SCLC) of which 73.6% received PCI. Incidence of mild/moderate cognitive decline after PCI varied from 8 to 89% (grading not always provided); for those without PCI, this was 3.4-42%. Interestingly, 23-95% had baseline cognitive impairment. Risk factors were often not reported. In one trial, both age (>60 years) and higher PCI dose (36 Gy) including twice-daily PCI were associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline. In one trial, white matter abnormalities were more frequent in the concurrent or sandwiched PCI arm, but without significant neuropsychological differences. One trial identified hippocampal sparing PCI to limit the neurocognitive toxicities of PCI and another reported an association between hippocampal dose volume effects and memory decline. As neurocognition was a secondary endpoint in most RCTs, and was assessed by various instruments with often poor/moderate compliance, high-quality data is lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, PCI dose, regimen and timing might be associated with cognitive impairment after PCI in lung cancer patients, but high-quality data is lacking. Future PCI trials should collect and evaluate possible risk factors systematically.

Adverse Events of Concurrent Radiotherapy and ALK Inhibitors for Brain Metastases of ALK-Rearranged Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

We investigated acute adverse events in patients with brain metastases (BMs) of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged (ALKr) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with both cranial radiotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of ALK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Acute AEs were retrospectively investigated in patients with BMs of ALKr-NSCLC who received both whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and ALK-TKI. For comparison, they were also assessed in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC and wild-type with neither ALK rearrangement nor EGFR mutation treated with WBRT.

RESULTS

Two ALKr cases were consequently eligible. Grade 3 otitis media unexpectedly occurred in both cases, while there was one case out of 11 and one case out of 18 of grade 2 otitis media among the EGFR-mutated cases and wild-type cases (p=0.013), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent treatment with WBRT and ALK-TKI may be associated with acute severe ear toxicity in patients with BMs of ALKr-NSCLC.

Palliative Radiotherapy: Inpatients, Outpatients, and the Changing Role of Supportive Care in Radiation Oncology

Palliative radiotherapy is an effective treatment in alleviating many symptoms of advanced cancer. Short courses of radiotherapy provide rapid symptom relief and minimize impact on patients. Patients referred for palliative radiotherapy have many concerns beyond radiotherapy; often, these concerns are not fully addressed in traditional radiotherapy clinics. Discussions of prognosis, patient goals, and concerns are areas for improved collaboration. Innovative, dedicated palliative radiotherapy programs have developed over the past 20 years to provide holistic care to patients referred for palliative radiotherapy and have improved patient-focused outcomes. Advanced radiotherapy techniques may provide opportunities to further improve palliative radiotherapy outcomes.

Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs with or without upfront brain radiotherapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with central nervous system metastases

Background

Although the clinical efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) in EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been demonstrated, their efficacy in EGFR‐mutant NSCLCs with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and the role of radiotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to determine if it is preferable to add upfront cranial radiotherapy to EGFR‐TKIs in patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases who received EGFR‐TKIs as a first‐line therapy.

Results

A total of 104 patients were enrolled and 39 patients received upfront brain radiotherapy, while 65 patients received first and second generation EGFR‐TKIs first. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3–9.4). The median survival time (MST) was 24.0 months (95% CI: 20.1–30.1). The overall response rate of the CNS was 37%. The median CNS progression‐free survival (PFS) was 13.2 months (95% CI: 10.0–16.2). Brain radiotherapy prior to EGFR‐TKI prolonged TTF (11.2 vs. 6.8 months, P = 0.038) and tended to prolong CNS‐PFS (15.6 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.096) but was not significantly associated with overall survival (MST 26.1 vs. 24.0 months, P = 0.525). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that poor performance status and the presence of extracranial metastases were poor prognostic factors related to overall survival.

Conclusion

EGFR‐TKI showed a favorable effect for EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with CNS metastases. Prolonged TTF and CNS‐PFS were observed with upfront brain radiotherapy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in targeted therapy treated oligo-metastatic oncogene-addicted (non-small-cell) lung cancer

While the prognosis of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer has shown significant progress these last years, notably with the discovery of oncogen-driven subtypes and the development of targeted therapies, significant improvements are still needed. More recently, numerous authors studied the oligo-metastasis concept, where the metastasis are limited in number and sites involved, and that could benefit from an aggressive approach of these lesions, for instance with the help of stereotactic radiotherapy. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus existing for the time being for the treatment of these tumors. Three main clinical situations can be distinguished: oligo-metastasis state de novo at diagnosis (synchronous) or as first metastatic event of an initially locally limited affection (metachronous); oligo-progression during systemic treatment of a pluri-metastatic disease; and finally oligo-persistence of some remaining metastatic lesions at the nadir of the systemic therapy effect. In this review, we will discuss the place of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small-cell oligo-metastatic oncogene-addicted cancers treated with targeted therapies, differentiating these three main clinical situations. In all these indications, this technique could provide a benefit in terms of local control, possibly even in specific survival, when associated with targeted therapy continuation, related to local control of the oligo-metastatic cerebral or extracerebral lesions.

Multidisciplinary expert opinion on the treatment consensus for patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases

The presence of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with higher incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, patients with synchronous brain metastases at diagnosis have generally been excluded from clinical trials. As there is limited clinical evidence for managing this patient population, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish medical and radiation oncologists, and neuro-oncologist with expertise treating brain metastases in lung cancer patients met with the aim of reaching and developing an expert opinion consensus on the management of patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This consensus contains 26 recommendations and 20 conclusion statements across 21 questions in 7 areas, as well as a first-line treatment algorithm.

Brain metastases and treatment: multiplying cognitive toxicities

INTRODUCTION

Thirty per cent of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with multiple combination or sequential treatment modalities available, to treat systemic or central nervous system (CNS) disease. Most patients experience toxicities as a result of these treatments, of which cognitive impairment is one of the adverse events most commonly reported, causing major impairment of the patient's quality of life. Areas covered: This article reviews the role of cancer treatments in cognitive decline of patients with brain metastases: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapies and hormone therapy. Pathological and molecular mechanisms, as well as future directions for limiting cognitive toxicities are also presented. Other causes of cognitive impairment in this population are discussed in order to refine the benefit-risk balance of each treatment modality. Expert opinion: Cumulative cognitive toxicity should be taken into account, and tailored to the patient's cognitive risk in the light of the expected survival benefit. Standardization of cognitive assessment in this context is needed in order to better appreciate each treatment's responsibility in cognitive impairment, keeping in mind disease itself impacts cognition in this context.

Comparison of up-front radiotherapy and TKI with TKI alone for NSCLC with brain metastases and EGFR mutation: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

About 50-70% non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation go through brain metastases (BM). Radiotherapy is the standard treatment before the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. However, the TKI has more than 70% intracranial response rate. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of up-front radiotherapy and TKI with TKI alone for NSCLC with BM and EGFR mutations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Medline, the Cochrane Library and important oncology meetings comparing the up-front radiotherapy (RT) and TKI with TKI alone in NSCLC patients with newly diagnosed BM and EGFR mutation from database inception to December 2017. We conducted meta-analyses evaluating intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on the HR of individual study.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1086 patients were eligible for meta-analyses. Compared to TKI alone, up-front RT and TKI showed better iPFS (HR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.53-0.97, p = 0.028) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95%CI 0.53-0.93, p = 0.015). Meta regression analyses and subgroup analyses demonstrated patients with limited number of brain metastases benefited more from up-front RT on OS (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.72, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Compared with TKI alone, up-front RT and TKI had a higher iPFS and OS, especially for patients with limited number of brain metastases. Larger randomized trials evaluating these two treatment arms are needed to identify optimal treatments for specific patients.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Patients With Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Indications, Decision Tools and Future Directions

Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most patients with BM have a limited life expectancy, measured in months. Selected patients may experience a very long progression-free survival, for example, patients with a targetable driver mutation. Traditionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the cornerstone of the treatment, but its indication is a matter of debate. A randomized trial has shown that for patients with a poor prognosis, WBRT does not add quality of life (QoL) nor survival over the best supportive care. In recent decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an attractive non-invasive treatment for patients with BM. Only the BM is irradiated to an ablative dose, sparing healthy brain tissue. Intracranial recurrence rates decrease when WBRT is administered following SRS or resection but does not improve overall survival and comes at the expense of neurocognitive function and QoL. The downside of SRS compared with WBRT is a risk of radionecrosis (RN) and a higher risk of developing new BM during follow-up. Currently, SRS is an established treatment for patients with a maximum of four BM. Several promising strategies are currently being investigated to further improve the indication and outcome of SRS for patients with BM: the effectivity and safety of SRS in patients with more than four BM, combining SRS with systemic therapy such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, shared decision-making with SRS as a treatment option, and individualized isotoxic dose prescription to mitigate the risk of RN and further enhance local control probability of SRS. This review discusses the current indications of SRS and future directions of treatment for patients with BM of NSCLC with focus on the value of SRS.

Brain Metastases in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Incidence and Treatment

Brain metastases (BM) are common in non-small cell lung cancer patients including in molecularly selected populations, such as EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged tumors. They are associated with a reduced quality of life, and are commonly the first site of progression for patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this review, we summarize incidence of BM and intracranial efficacy with TKI agents according to oncogene driver mutations, focusing on important clinical issues, notably optimal first-line treatment in oncogene-addicted lung tumors with upfront BM (local therapies followed by TKI vs. TKI monotherapy). We also discuss the potential role of newly emerging late-generation TKIs as new standard treatment in oncogene-addicted lung cancer tumors compared with sequential strategies.

Diversity of brain metastases screening and management in non-small cell lung cancer in Europe: Results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group survey

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but there is a lack of evidence-based management of this patient group. We aimed to capture a snapshot of routine BM management in Europe to identify relevant research questions for future clinical trials.

METHODS

An EORTC Lung Cancer Group (LCG) online survey containing questions on NSCLC BM screening and treatment was distributed between 16/02/17 and 15/06/17 to worldwide EORTC LCG members, and through several European scientific societies in the thoracic oncology field.

RESULTS

A total of 462 European physician responses (394 institutions) were analysed (radiation oncologist: 53% [n = 247], pulmonologist: 26% [n = 119], medical oncologist: 18% [n = 84]; 84% with >5 years' experience in NSCLC). Italy (18%, n = 85), Netherlands (15%, n = 68), UK (14%, n = 66), and France (12%, n = 55) contributed most. 393 physicians (85%) screened neurologically asymptomatic patients for BM at diagnosis (52% using magnetic resonance imaging). Most often screened patients were those with a driver mutation (MUT+; 51%, n = 234), stage III (63%, n = 289), and IV (43%, n = 199). 158 physicians (34%) used a prognostic classification to guide initial treatment decisions, and in 50%, lowest prognostic-score threshold to receive treatment differed between MUT+ and non-driver mutation (MUT-) patients. MUT+ patients with >4 BM were more likely to receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with MUT- (27% versus. 21%; p < 0.01). Most physicians (90%) had access to SRS. After single BM surgery, 50% systematically prescribed SRS or WBRT, and 45% only in case of incomplete resection. The preferred treatment in neurologically asymptomatic treatment-naive patients diagnosed with >5 BM was systemic treatment (79%). Of all, 45%/49% physicians stated that all tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockers were discontinued (timing varied) during SRS/WBRT, respectively. Drugs most often continued during SRS/WBRT were erlotinib (44%/40%), gefitinib (39%/34%), afatinib (29%/25%), crizotinib (33%/26%) and anti-PD-(L)-1 (28%/22%).

CONCLUSION

BM management is highly variable in Europe: screening is not uniform, prognostic classifications are not often used and MUT+ NSCLC patients generally receive more intensive local treatment. Prospective assessment of BM management in MUT+ NSCLC patients is required.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy in brain metastases: emerging options in precision medicine

Brain metastases (BM) continue to represent an unmet clinical need in oncology. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy hold great promise in the treatment of BM. Emerging data are confirming the activity of these agents in patients with BM. Genomic studies have confirmed that clinically actionable mutations are present in BM and they can be used in clinical studies to link targeted therapies with their genetic targets. Furthermore, as molecular signatures associated with sensitivity and resistance to immunotherapies are developed, we will better be able to select BM patients who will most benefit from these therapies. Understanding the genetic and immune evolution within BM should drive the next generation of immunotherapy and target therapy, as well as increase the accuracy of the selection process for these therapies.

Management of non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: the role of radiotherapy in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy-opportunities and challenges

In recent years, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was greatly promoted by the discovery of oncogenic drivers and the development of targeted therapies specific for these drivers. Somatic mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most common type in patients with NSCLC. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting EGFR produced relatively high response rate and long duration with acceptable toxicity profile. Also, the life expectancy in patients with active EGFR mutation has been significantly prolonged than the past. Additionally, evolution of advanced imaging and radiation techniques has expanded the indications for radiotherapy in complex clinical situation. All of those factors contributed to the widely use of radiotherapy for advanced NSCLC treated with TKI therapy. In this review, we will discuss how to integrate radiotherapy into the comprehensive treatment of patients with TKI therapy in order to maximize the therapeutics effect.

Use of Systemic Therapy Concurrent With Cranial Radiotherapy for Cerebral Metastases of Solid Tumors

The incidence of brain metastases of solid tumors is increasing. Local treatment of brain metastases is generally straightforward: cranial radiotherapy (e.g., whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) or resection when feasible. However, treatment becomes more complex when brain metastases occur while other metastases, outside of the central nervous system, are being controlled with systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, or monoclonal antibodies). It is known that some anticancer agents can increase the risk for neurotoxicity when used concurrently with radiotherapy. Increased neurotoxicity decreases quality of life, which is undesirable in this predominantly palliative patient group. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify the compounds that should be temporarily discontinued when cranial radiotherapy is needed.This review summarizes the (neuro)toxicity data for combining systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, or monoclonal antibodies) with concurrent radiotherapy of brain metastases. Because only a limited amount of high-level data has been published, a risk assessment of each agent was done, taking into account the characteristics of each compound (e.g., lipophilicity) and the microenvironment of brain metastasis. The available trials suggest that only gemcitabine, erlotinib, and vemurafenib induce significant neurotoxicity when used concurrently with cranial radiotherapy. We conclude that for most systemic therapies, the currently available literature does not show an increase in neurotoxicity when these therapies are used concurrently with cranial radiotherapy. However, further studies are needed to confirm safety because there is no high-level evidence to permit definitive conclusions. The Oncologist 2017;22:222-235Implications for Practice: The treatment of symptomatic brain metastases diagnosed while patients are receiving systemic therapy continues to pose a dilemma to clinicians. Will concurrent treatment with cranial radiotherapy and systemic therapy (chemotherapeutics, molecular targeted agents, and monoclonal antibodies), used to control intra- and extracranial tumor load, increase the risk for neurotoxicity? This review addresses this clinically relevant question and evaluates the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial radiotherapy, based on currently available literature, in order to determine the need to and interval to interrupt systemic treatment.

Integration of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Stage IV Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer

: Genotype-based selection of patients for targeted therapies has had a substantial impact on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed at cancers driven by oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, often achieve dramatic responses and result in prolonged survival compared with chemotherapy. However, TKI resistance invariably develops. Disease progression can be limited to only one or a few sites and might not be symptomatic, raising the important question of whether this type of oligoprogression warrants a change in systemic therapy or consideration of local treatment. Recent clinical observations suggest a growing role for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligoprogressive and perhaps even oligopersistent disease (primary and/or metastases) in oncogene-driven NSCLC. SBRT might allow patients to continue with existing TKI treatments longer and delay the need to switch to other systemic options. We review the current data with regard to the use of SBRT for metastatic NSCLC and particularly oncogene-driven disease. Although there is great promise in the marriage of targeted therapies with SBRT, prospective data are urgently needed. In the meantime, such strategies are being used in carefully selected patients, with risk-adapted SBRT dose-fractionation regimens used to optimize the therapeutic index.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or SBRT-like treatments are increasingly being used for oligoprogression in patients with oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer. This approach allows patients to extend the duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and has the potential to prolong survival times. Careful patient selection and risk-adapted radiation dosing is of critical importance to minimize toxicity and preserve patient quality of life.

Central nervous system involvement in ALK-rearranged NSCLC: promising strategies to overcome crizotinib resistance

INTRODUCTION

ALK rearranged Non Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLCs) represent a distinct subgroup of patients with peculiar clinic-pathological features. These patients exhibit dramatic responses when treated with the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor Crizotinib, albeit Central Nervous System (CNS) activity is much less impressive than that observed against extracranial lesions. CNS involvement has become increasingly observed in these patients, given their prolonged survival. Several novel generation ALK inhibitors have been developing to increase CNS penetration and to provide more complete ALK inhibition..

AREAS COVERED

The CNS activity of Crizotinib and novel generation ALK inhibitors will be summarized in this review, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the therapeutic strategies developed to date in this specific subgroup of NSCLCs with a look towards the future. Expert commentary: In the next few years, the results of ongoing comparative head-to-head trials will provide the definitive conclusions on the optimal treatment sequence in ALK-rearranged NSCLCs. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials with novel-generation ALK inhibitors will produce more evidences on the best approach in the growing number of ALK-positive NSCLCs with CNS involvement.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for treating brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Local approaches of neurosurgery (usually for single brain lesions), whole brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery are often withheld for the treatment of NSCLC-derived brain metastases (BMs). However, systemic treatment is consistently emerging as an option for patients with asymptomatic BMs, which could allow for delaying cranial radiotherapy at symptomatic/radiological progression.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for molecularly selected NSCLCs, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged diseases, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are all systemic treatments that have shown activity against NSCLC-derived CNS metastases. Among these, EGFR- and ALK-TKIs will be discussed more in detail owing to their superior efficacy in this context.

EXPERT OPINION

Up-front systemic treatment should be considered for patients with asymptomatic, multiple BMs, as recently acknowledged by the European Society of Medical Oncology guidelines. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that the best treatment strategy for NSCLC-derived BMs has to be defined within a multidisciplinary team.