Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A critical literature review of predictive factors of relapse

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung cancer: a contemporary review

The treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved enormously in the last two decades. Although surgery is not the only choice, lobectomy is still the gold standard treatment type for operable patients. For inoperable patients stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be offered, reaching very high local control and overall survival rates. With SBRT we can precisely irradiate small, well-defined lesions with high doses. To select the appropriate fractionation schedule it is important to determine the size, localization and extent of the lung tumor. The introduction of novel and further developed planning (contouring guidelines, diagnostic image application, planning systems) and delivery techniques (motion management, image guided radiotherapy) led to lower rates of side effects and more conformal target volume coverage. The purpose of this study is to summarize the current developments, randomised studies, guidelines about lung SBRT, with emphasis on the possibility of increasing local control and overall rates in "fit," operable patients as well, so SBRT would be eligible in place of surgery.

Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary or secondary lung malignancies: Tumor control probability and safety analyses

BACKGROUND

Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with primary or secondary lung malignancies represents an appealing definitive approach, but its feasibility and safety are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) and toxicity for patients receiving reirradiation with SBRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with recurrence of primary or secondary lung malignancies from our hospital were subjected to reirradiation with SBRT, and PubMed- and Embase-indexed articles were reviewed. The patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric details, local tumor control, and toxicities were extracted. The logistic dose-response models were compared for TCP and overall survival (OS) in terms of the physical dose and three-, four-, and five-fraction equivalent doses.

RESULTS

The data of 17 patients from our hospital and 195 patients extracted from 12 articles were summarized. Reirradiation with SBRT yielded 2-year estimates of 80% TCP for doses of 50.10 Gy, 55.85 Gy, and 60.54 Gy in three, four, and five fractions, respectively. The estimated TCP with common fractionation schemes were 50%, 60%, and 70% for 42.04 Gy, 47.44 Gy, and 53.32 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the 2-year estimated OS was 50%, 60%, and 70% for 41.62 Gy, 46.88 Gy, and 52.55 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Central tumor localization may be associated with severe toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation with SBRT doses of 50-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions is feasible for appropriately selected patients with recurrence of peripheral primary or secondary lung malignancies, but should be carefully considered for centrally-located tumors due to potentially severe toxicity. Further studies are warranted for optimal dose/fractionation schedules and more accurate selection of patients suitable for reirradiation with SBRT.

Real-World Results of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for 399 Medically Operable Patients with Stage I Histology-Proven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Surgery is the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no clear randomized trial demonstrates its superiority to stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regarding survival. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of SBRT in operable patients with stage I NSCLC using a large Japanese multi-institutional database to show real-world outcome. Exactly 399 patients (median age 75 years; 262 males and 137 females) with stage I (IA 292, IB 107) histologically proven NSCLC (adenocarcinoma 267, squamous cell carcinoma 96, others 36) treated at 20 institutions were reviewed. SBRT was prescribed at a total dose of 48-70 Gy in 4-10 fractions. The median follow-up period was 38 months. Local progression-free survival rates were 84.2% in all patients and 86.1% in the T1, 78.6% in T2, 89.2% in adenocarcinoma, and 70.5% in squamous cell subgroups. Overall 3-year survival rates were 77.0% in all patients: 90.7% in females, 69.6% in males, and 41.2% in patients with pulmonary interstitial changes. Fatal radiation pneumonitis was observed in two patients, all of whom had pulmonary interstitial changes. This real-world evidence will be useful in shared decision-making for optimal treatment, including SBRT for operable stage I NSCLC, particularly in older patients.

Predicting cancer relapse following lung stereotactic radiotherapy: an external validation study using real-world evidence

Purpose

For patients receiving lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), evidence suggests that high peritumor density predicts an increased risk of microscopic disease (MDE) and local-regional failure, but only if there is low or heterogenous incidental dose surrounding the tumor (GTV). A data-mining method (Cox-per-radius) has been developed to investigate this dose-density interaction. We apply the method to predict local relapse (LR) and regional failure (RF) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

199 patients treated in a routine setting were collated from a single institution for training, and 76 patients from an external institution for validation. Three density metrics (mean, 90th percentile, standard deviation (SD)) were studied in 1mm annuli between 0.5cm inside and 2cm outside the GTV boundary. Dose SD and fraction of volume receiving less than 30Gy were studied in annuli 0.5-2cm outside the GTV to describe incidental MDE dosage. Heat-maps were created that correlate with changes in LR and RF rates due to the interaction between dose heterogeneity and density at each distance combination. Regions of significant improvement were studied in Cox proportional hazards models, and explored with and without re-fitting in external data. Correlations between the dose component of the interaction and common dose metrics were reported.

Results

Local relapse occurred at a rate of 6.5% in the training cohort, and 18% in the validation cohort, which included larger and more centrally located tumors. High peritumor density in combination with high dose variability (0.5 - 1.6cm) predicts LR. No interactions predicted RF. The LR interaction improved the predictive ability compared to using clinical variables alone (optimism-adjusted C-index; 0.82 vs 0.76). Re-fitting model coefficients in external data confirmed the importance of this interaction (C-index; 0.86 vs 0.76). Dose variability in the 0.5-1.6 cm annular region strongly correlates with heterogeneity inside the target volume (SD; ρ = 0.53 training, ρ = 0.65 validation).

Conclusion

In these real-world cohorts, the combination of relatively high peritumor density and high dose variability predicts increase in LR, but not RF, following lung SABR. This external validation justifies potential use of the model to increase low-dose CTV margins for high-risk patients.

Gut Microbiome Is Associated With the Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the dynamic change of gut microbiota and its predictive role in progression-free survival (PFS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-one patients with NSCLC in 2 phase 2 trials (NCT02573506 and NCT03006575) were analyzed. A total of 102 fecal samples were collected at 3 time points (T0, before CCRT; T1, 2 weeks after the initiation of CCRT; and T2, the end of CCRT). Gut microbiota composition and functionality were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, respectively. Alpha diversity, taxonomic composition, and KEGG functional pathways were compared between patients in the long-PFS group (PFS ≥11.0 months) and short-PFS group (PFS <11.0 months). A random forest classifier was constructed to identify microbial signature related to PFS. Clinical and microbial factors potentially predictive of PFS were assessed in the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The abundance of Bacteroidota and Proteobacteria increased, while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased after CCRT. Shannon index (P = .006) and PD index (P = .022) were significantly higher in the long-PFS group than for those in the short-PFS group at T1. The PFS-prediction microbial signature at T1 included unclassified members of the Lanchospiraceae spp., such as NK4A136 and UCG-003 groups, Dorea sp., various strains from within the Eubacterium hallii and E. siraeum groups, and an unclassified member of the Muribaculaceae, which yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.87. These discriminatory genera mostly belong to phylum Firmicutes/family Clostridia. Multivariate analysis indicated PD index (HR = 8.036, P = .016) and the abundance of Dorea sp. at T1 (HR = 4.186, P = .043) were independent predictors of PFS. The KEGG pathways at T1 overrepresented in the long-PFS group included fatty acid metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis, and arginine biosynthesis. Those overrepresented in the short-PFS group included lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and biosynthesis of vancomycin group antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut microbiota composition and functionality at 2 weeks after the initiation of CCRT were associated with PFS in NSCLC. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

The Clinical Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Nomogram Models for Primary Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a standard treatment for early primary lung cancer patients. However, there are few simple models for predicting the clinical outcomes of these patients. Our study analyzed the clinical outcomes, identified the prognostic factors, and developed prediction nomogram models for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 114 patients with primary lung cancer treated with SBRT from 2012 to 2020 at our institutions and assessed patient's clinical outcomes and levels of toxicity. Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test was used to generate the survival curve. The cut-off values of continuous factors were calculated with the X-tile tool. Potential independent prognostic factors for clinical outcomes were explored using cox regression analysis. Nomograms for clinical outcomes prediction were established with identified factors and assessed by calibration curves.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 40.6 months, with 3-year OS, local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and progression free survival (PFS) of 56.3%, 61.3%, 72.9% and 35.8%, respectively, with grade 3 or higher toxicity rate of 7%. The cox regression analysis revealed that the clinical stage, immobilization device, and the prescription dose covering 95% of the target area (D95) were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. Moreover, the clinical stage, and immobilization device were independent prognostic factors of LRFS and PFS. The smoking status, hemoglobin (Hb) and immobilization device were significant prognostic factors for DDFS. The nomograms and calibration curves incorporating the above factors indicated good predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is effective and safe for primary lung cancer. The prognostic factors associated with OS, LRFS, DDFS and PFS are proposed, and the nomograms we proposed are suitable for clinical outcomes prediction.

Optimising use of 4D-CT phase information for radiomics analysis in lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

Purpose. 4D-CT is routine imaging for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. No studies have investigated optimal 4D phase selection for radiomics. We aim to determine how phase data should be used to identify prognostic biomarkers for distant failure, and test whether stability assessment is required. A phase selection approach will be developed to aid studies with different 4D protocols and account for patient differences. Methods. 186 features were extracted from the tumour and peritumour on all phases for 258 patients. Feature values were selected from phase features using four methods: (A) mean across phases, (B) median across phases, (C) 50% phase, and (D) the most stable phase (closest in value to two neighbours), coined personalised selection. Four levels of stability assessment were also analysed, with inclusion of: (1) all features, (2) stable features across all phases, (3) stable features across phase and neighbour phases, and (4) features averaged over neighbour phases. Clinical-radiomics models were built for twelve combinations of feature type and assessment method. Model performance was assessed by concordance index (c-index) and fraction of new information from radiomic features. Results. The most stable phase spanned the whole range but was most often near exhale. All radiomic signatures provided new information for distant failure prediction. The personalised model had the highest c-index (0.77), and 58% of new information was provided by radiomic features when no stability assessment was performed. Conclusion. The most stable phase varies per-patient and selecting this improves model performance compared to standard methods. We advise the single most stable phase should be determined by minimising feature differences to neighbour phases. Stability assessment over all phases decreases performance by excessively removing features. Instead, averaging of neighbour phases should be used when stability is of concern. The models suggest that higher peritumoural intensity predicts distant failure.

Stereotactic Radiation for Lung Cancer: A Practical Approach to Challenging Scenarios

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for medically inoperable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT is a noninvasive treatment involving the delivery of ablative radiation doses with high precision in the course of a few treatments. Relative to conventionally fractionated radiation, SBRT achieves superior local control and survival. SBRT use has increased dramatically in the past 15 years and is currently considered the standard of care in cases of inoperable early stage NSCLC. It is being increasingly applied to more complex patient populations at higher risk of treatment-related toxicity. In these more complex patients, there is an increasing need to balance patient and treatment factors in selecting the optimal patients for SBRT. Here, we review several challenging clinical scenarios often encountered in thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Thoracic radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer-a narrative review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 10–15% of all lung cancers and has a poor prognosis. Thoracic radiotherapy plays a central role in current SCLC management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard of care for localised disease (stage I−III, limited-stage, LS). Definitive thoracic radiotherapy may be offered in metastatic patients (stage IV, extensive stage, ES-SCLC) after chemotherapy. For LS-SCLC, the gold standard is early accelerated hyperfractionated twice-daily CTRT (4 cycles of cisplatin etoposide, starting with the first or second chemotherapy cycle). Modern radiation techniques should be used with involved-field radiotherapy based on baseline CT and PET/CT scans. In ES-SCLC, thoracic radiotherapy should be discussed in cases of initial bulky mediastinal disease/residual thoracic disease not progressing after induction chemotherapy. This strategy was however not assessed in recent trials establishing chemo-immunotherapy as the standard first line treatment in ES-SCLC. Future developments include technical radiotherapy advances and the incorporation of new drugs. Thoracic irradiation is delivered more precisely given technical developments (IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy), reducing the risks of severe adverse events. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be discussed in rare early stage (T1 to 2, N0) inoperable patients. A number of current clinical trials are investigating immunoradiotherapy. In this review, we highlight the current role of thoracic radiotherapy and describe ongoing research in the integration of biological surrogate markers, advanced radiotherapy technologies and novel drugs in SCLC patients.

Radiation Modalities Used in Lung Cancer: An Overview for Thoracic Surgeons

Radiation is a constantly evolving technology which plays a role in the management of lung cancer in a variety of settings: as an adjunct to surgery, definitively, and palliatively. Key aspects of radiation oncology-including acute and chronic toxicities of thoracic radiation and rationale for choosing one modality of radiation over another-may be obscure to those outside the field. We aim to provide a useful overview relevant for the thoracic surgeon of radiation technology and delivery. A review was performed of salient articles identifying radiation technologies used in lung cancer which were summarized and expounded upon with focus on integrating their history, evolution, and landmark trials establishing basis of their use. This article reviews the four fundamental means of external beam radiation employed in managing lung cancer and provides visual examples of comparison plans. We also touch on potential practice-changing developments in regards to proton therapy and radiation in the era of immunotherapy. Radiation oncology has evolved considerably over time to become a critical part of lung cancer management, particularly in early-stage inoperable disease and locally advanced disease. Maximizing tumor control while minimizing toxicity drives treatment strategies. Knowledge of these fundamentals will help the thoracic surgeon answer many questions patients pose regarding radiation.

Extending hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy to tumours larger than 70cc - effects and side effects

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumours ≥5 cm is poorly studied and its utility and feasibility is uncertain. We here report the Karolinska experience of SBRT in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients had a gross tumour volume (GTV) ≥70 cc, a prescribed physical dose of at least 40 Gy and received treatment between 1995-2012.

RESULTS

We included 164 patients with 175 tumours located in the thorax (n = 86), the liver (n = 27) and the abdomen (n = 62) and treated with a median prescribed dose (BED_α/β 10Gy) of 80 Gy (71.4-113). One- and 2- year local control rates were 82% and 61%. In multivariate analyses, minimum dose to the GTV and histological subtype were associated with local control. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology showed the most favourable local control - 94% at 2 years for all histologies. Thirty-seven patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicity most likely related to SBRT. Seven of the ten patients with grade 5 toxicity, had a centrally located tumour in the thorax.

CONCLUSION

SBRT of tumours >5 cm in diameter may be an option for peripherally located lung and abdominal tumours. Histological origin and tumour location should be considered before treatment.

Automated gross tumor volume contour generation for large-scale analysis of early-stage lung cancer patients planned with 4D-CT

PURPOSE

Patients with early-stage lung cancer undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy receive four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) for treatment planning. Often, an internal gross target volume (iGTV), which approximates the motion envelope of a tumor over the breathing cycle, is delineated without defining a gross tumor volume (GTV). However, the GTV volume and shape are important parameters for prognostic and dose modelling, and there is interest in radiomic features extracted from the GTV and surrounding tissue. We demonstrate and validate a method to generate the GTV from an iGTV contour to aid retrospective analysis on routine data.

METHOD

It is possible to reconstruct the geometry of a tumor with knowledge of tumor motion and the motion envelope formed during respiration. To demonstrate this, the tumor motion path was estimated with local rigid registration, and the iGTV positioned incrementally at stations along the reverse path. It is shown that the tumor volume is the largest set common to the intersection of the iGTV at these positions, hence can be derived. This was implemented for 521 lung lesions on 4D-CT. Eleven patients with a GTV delineation performed by a radiation oncologist on a reference phase (50%) were used for validation. The generated GTV was compared to that delineated by the expert using distance-to-agreement (DTA), volume, and distance between centres of mass. An overall success rate was determined by detecting registration inaccuracy and performing a quality check on the routine iGTV. For successfully generated contours, GTV volume was compared to iGTV volume in a prognostic model for overall survival.

RESULTS

For the validation dataset, DTA mean (0.79 - 1.55 mm) and standard deviation (0.68 - 1.51 mm) were comparable to expected observer variation. Difference in volume was < 5 cm³ , and average difference in position was 1.21 mm. Deviations in shape and position were mainly caused by observer differences in iGTV and GTV interpretation as opposed to algorithm performance. For the complete dataset, an acceptable contour was generated for 94% of patients using statistical and visual assessment to detect failures. Generated GTV volumes improved prognostic model performance over iGTV volumes.

CONCLUSION

A method to generate a GTV from an iGTV and 4D-CT dataset was developed. This method facilitates data analysis of patients with early-stage lung cancer treated in the routine setting, that is, data mining, prognostic modeling, and radiomics. Generation failure detection removes the need for visual assessment of all contours, reducing a time-consuming aspect of big-data analysis. Favorable prognostic performance of generated GTV volumes over iGTV ones demonstrates opportunities to use this methodology for future study.

Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10^-2 with overall and failure-free survival of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 160 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between June 2010 and December 2012 in a large, tertiary cancer institute was undertaken. Both diagnostic and archived planning CT were uploaded to the treatment planning system to determine tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV1) and planning time (GTV2). The time (t) between both CTs was recorded. SGR was calculated using GTV1, GTV2, and t. The median SGR (0.43 × 10^-2 ) from our previous data was used to group patients into low and high SGR cohorts. Log-rank test was used to compare overall (OS) and failure-free survivals (FFS) of SGR groups.

RESULTS

The median time interval between diagnostic and planning CT scans was 87 days. The median OS was 38 and 66 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). The median FFS was 27 and 55 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.005). High SGR (P < 0.05), male gender (P = <0.01), and GTV2 (P = <0.05) were associated with poorer FFS.

CONCLUSIONS

High SGR was associated with poorer outcome in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT. SGR can be used in conjunction with other well-known predictive factors to formulate a practical predictive model to identify subgroups of the patient at higher risk of recurrence after SBRT.

Prognostic factors of local control and disease free survival in centrally located non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) results in high local control (LC) rates in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For central lung tumors, risk-adapted fractionation schedules are used and underdosage to the Planned Target Volume (PTV) is often accepted to respect the dose constraints of the organs at risk in order to avoid high rates of toxicity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of PTV underdosage and other possible prognostic factors on local- and disease control after SBRT in patients with central lung tumors.Material and Methods: Patients with centrally located NSCLC treated with SBRT were included. The doses were converted into biologically equivalent dose using α/β-value of 10 Gy (BED₁₀). Underdosage to the PTV was defined as the (percentage of) PTV receiving less than 100 Gy BED₁₀; (%)PTV < 100 BED₁₀. Potential prognostic factors for LC and Disease Free Survival (DFS) were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.Results: Two hundred and twenty patients received ≤12 fractions of SBRT. LC-rates were 88% at 2 years and 81% at 3 years. Twenty-seven patients developed a local recurrence. Both the PTV < 100 BED₁₀ and %PTV < 100 BED₁₀ were not prognostic for LC. Tumor size and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) were independently prognostic for LC. Disease progression was reported in 75 patients with DFS-rates of 66% at 2 years and 56% at 3 years. Disease recurrence was independent significantly associated with larger tumor diameter, lower lobe tumor location and decreased FEV₁. Grade 4-5 toxicity was reported in 10 patients (8 with ultra-central tumors) and was fatal in at least 3 patients.Conclusion: Decrease in tumor coverage was not correlated with the local recurrence probability. The LC and DFS were promising after SBRT of centrally located NSCLC with tumor size, FEV₁ and tumor location (for DFS only) as prognostic factors.

Radiological assessment after stereotactic body radiation of lung tumours

The increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumours comes along with new post-therapeutic imaging findings that should be known by physicians involved in patient follow-up. Radiation-induced lung injury is much more frequent than after conventional radiation therapy, it can also be delayed and has a different radiological presentation. Radiation-induced lung injury after stereotactic body radiation therapy involves the lung parenchyma surrounding the target tumour and appears as a dynamic process continuing for years after completion of the treatment. Thus, the radiological pattern and the severity of radiation-induced lung injury are prone to changes during follow-up, which can make it difficult to differentiate from local recurrence. Contrary to radiation-induced lung injury, local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy is rare. Other complications mainly depend on tumour location and include airway complications, rib fractures and organizing pneumonia. The aim of this article is to provide a wide overview of radiological changes occurring after SBRT for lung tumours. Awareness of changes following stereotactic body radiation therapy should help avoiding unnecessary interventions for pseudo tumoral presentations.

Dose prescription in SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: are we all speaking the same language?

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of early-stage lung cancers. Guidelines provide indications regarding the constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) and the minimum coverage of the planning target volume but do not suggest optimal dose distribution. Data on dose distribution from the different published series are not comparable due to different prescription modalities and reported dose parameters.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the published data on dose prescription, focusing on the role of homogeneity on local tumor control, and present suggestions on how to specify and report the prescriptions to permit comparisons between studies or between cases from different centers.

CONCLUSIONS

To identify the dose-prescription modality that better correlates with oncologic outcomes, future studies should guarantee a close uniformity of dose distribution between cases and complete dose parameters reporting for treatment volumes and OARs.

Total flavonoids suppress lung cancer growth via the COX-2-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

The aim of the present study was to explore the anti-cancer effects of total flavonoids (TF) on lung cancer and to investigate the underlying mechanism. The inhibitory effect of TF on the proliferation of A549 cells in vitro was measured using an MTT assay. The apoptotic rate of TF-treated A549 cells was analyzed using flow cytometry and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotinylated UTP nick end labeling. Migration and invasion assays were performed to investigate the anti-migration effect of TF on A549 cells. Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR was used to analyze BCL2-like 2, BCL2, Bax, Bad, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), Wnt and β-catenin mRNA expression levels in A549 cells. The in vivo anti-cancer effect of TF was investigated in a subcutaneous xenograft model of lung cancer in BALB/c nude mice. The results obtained in the present study revealed that TF exerted a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation of A549 cells in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.01). TF induced apoptosis of A549 cells, which exhibited increased and decreased expression of pro- and anti- apoptotic genes, respectively. Furthermore, TF had a significant inhibitory effect on the migration and invasion of A549 cells (P<0.01). The mRNA expression levels of COX-2, Wnt and β-catenin were significantly downregulated in TF-treated A549 cells compared with controls. Additionally, treatment with TF inhibited tumor growth in mice, with a tumor inhibition rate of 64.07% compared with the controls. TF exhibited significant tumor inhibitory effects in vivo by promoting the apoptosis of tumor cells. In conclusion, the results suggested that TF may regulate lung cancer growth via the COX-2-Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. TF may serve as a novel anti-cancer agent for the treatment of lung cancer.

Pattern of recurrence after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripheral early non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The treatment efficacy after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have not been adequately addressed. The purpose of this study was to investigate pattern of recurrence according to irradiation field after CyberKnife SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with peripheral cT1/2N0M0 NSCLC that was treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife between May 2013 and March 2016 at single institute and followed up by more than two imaging examinations. Both operable and inoperable patients were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative incidence curves of recurrence were calculated and compared using the Gray's test.

Results

Total 71 patients were included and analyzed in this study. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 34 months (range, 7-64 months). The 2-year OS and PFS rate were 93% (95% CI: 83-97%) and 77% (95% CI: 65-86%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence rate of infield recurrence and out-of-field recurrence were 6% (95% CI: 2-14%) and 17% (95% CI: 9-27%), respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) ≥9 mL and diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) ≥90 days were significantly associated with infield recurrence (P<0.001 and P=0.007), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was significantly associated with out-of-field recurrence (P=0.014).

Conclusions

Treatment efficacy after CyberKnife SBRT for peripheral early-stage NSCLC was identical to previous conventional linac-based SBRT reports. With short follow-up period, it was found that GTV and DTI were the significant predictive factor of infield recurrence, and EGFR mutation was the significant predictive factor of out-of-field recurrence.

Combining Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Can We Expect Limitations Due to Altered Normal Tissue Toxicity?

In recent decades, technical advances in surgery and radiotherapy, as well as breakthroughs in the knowledge on cancer biology, have helped to substantially improve the standard of cancer care with respect to overall response rates, progression-free survival, and the quality of life of cancer patients. In this context, immunotherapy is thought to have revolutionized the standard of care for cancer patients in the long term. For example, immunotherapy approaches such as immune checkpoint blockade are currently increasingly being used in cancer treatment, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and there is hope from the first clinical trials that the appropriate integration of immunotherapy into standard care will raise the success rates of cancer therapy to a new level. Nevertheless, successful cancer therapy remains a major challenge, particularly in tumors with either pronounced resistance to chemotherapy and radiation treatment, a high risk of normal tissue complications, or both, as in lung cancer. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have the capacity to evoke adverse effects in normal tissues when administered alone. However, therapy concepts are usually highly complex, and it is still not clear if combining immunotherapy with radio(chemo)therapy will increase the risk of normal tissue complications, in particular since normal tissue toxicity induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy can involve immunologic processes. Unfortunately, no reliable biomarkers are available so far that are suited to predict the unique normal tissue sensitivity of a given patient to a given treatment. Consequently, clinical trials combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy are attracting major attention, not only regarding efficacy, but also with regard to safety. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge of radiation-induced and immunotherapy-induced effects in tumor and normal tissue of the lung, and discuss the potential limitations of combined radio-immunotherapy in lung cancer with a focus on the suspected risk for enhanced acute and chronic normal tissue toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for mediastinal lymph node metastases: how do we fly in a 'no-fly zone'?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment-induced toxicity (as primary endpoint) and the efficacy (as secondary endpoint) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs) in the so-called no-fly zone (NFZ) in cancers with various histology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-two patients were retrospectively analyzed. Institutional dose/volume constraints for organs at risk (OARs) derived by published data were strictly respected. The correlation between treatment-related variables and toxicity was investigated by logistic regression, Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) were collected from the follow-up reports. The impact of potential predictive factors on LC, PFS and OS were estimated by Cox proportional-hazard regression.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 16 months (range 1-41). Four patients had esophageal G1 toxicity. Ten and six patients had G1 and G2 pulmonary toxicity, respectively. Treatment site and irradiation technique were significantly correlated with G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 1 toxicity, respectively. OS probability at 19 months was 88.3% and corresponded to CSS. LC probability at 16 months was 66.3% (median LC duration: 22 months, range 1-41). Fifteen patients (35.7%) were disease-free at 25 months (median time, range 1-41). The biologically effective dose (BED) and the target dose coverage indexes were significantly correlated with LC.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT can be considered as a safe treatment option for selected patients with oligo-metastases/recurrences in the NFZ, if strict dose/volume constraints are applied.

Metabolic positron emission tomography parameters predict failure patterns in early non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: a single institution experience

Objective

The prognostic value of metabolic parameters using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) has not been established for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accordingly, the authors investigated the prognostic value of metabolic parameters in terms of failure patterns in patients with early NSCLC who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods

Data from 35 patients with Stage I NSCLC who underwent SBRT using CyberKnife and received pretreatment FDG PET/CT between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were measured. The significance of these parameters with regard to failure patterns was assessed.

Results

The median follow-up was 23 months for all patients and 34 months for living patients. Ten patients experienced recurrence: three local failures, five regional failures (RF), and eight distant failures (DF). Three-year local, regional and distant control rates were 96.7%, 86.4% and 71.1%, respectively. High SUVmax (<9 vs. ≥9) was an independent predictive factor associated with increased RF (P = 0.027) and DF (P = 0.008). Furthermore, SUVmax was indicative of both progression-free (P = 0.015) and overall (P = 0.034) survival.

Conclusions

High SUVmax was a significant metabolic parameter associated with increased RF and DF in patients with early NSCLC who received SBRT, having a high propensity for dissemination. These results suggest that adjuvant treatment in conjunction with SBRT may be considered in patients with early NSCLC and high SUVmax.

Interobserver reliability in describing radiographic lung changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Radiographic lung changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) vary widely between patients. Standardized descriptions of acute (≤6 months after treatment) and late (>6 months after treatment) benign lung changes have been proposed but the reliable application of these classification systems has not been demonstrated. Herein, we examine the interobserver reliability of classifying acute and late lung changes after SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 280 follow-up computed tomography scans at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment were analyzed in 100 patients undergoing thoracic SBRT. Standardized descriptions of acute lung changes (3- and 6-month scans) include diffuse consolidation, patchy consolidation and ground glass opacity (GGO), diffuse GGO, patchy GGO, and no change. Late lung change classifications (12-month scans) include modified conventional pattern, mass-like pattern, scar-like pattern, and no change. Five physicians scored the images independently in a blinded fashion. Fleiss' kappa scores quantified the interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

The Kappa scores were 0.30 at 3 months, 0.20 at 6 months, and 0.25 at 12 months. The proportion of patients in each category at 3 and 6 months was as follows: Diffuse consolidation 11% and 21%; patchy consolidation and GGO 15% and 28%; diffuse GGO 10% and 11%; patchy GGO 15% and 15%; and no change 49% and 25%, respectively. The percentage of patients in each category at 12 months was as follows: Modified conventional 46%; mass-like 16%; scar-like 26%; and no change 12%. Uniform scoring between the observers occurred in 26, 8, and 14 cases at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interobserver reliability scores indicate a fair agreement to classify radiographic lung changes after SBRT. Qualitative descriptions are insufficient to categorize these findings because most patient scans do not fit clearly into a single classification. Categorization at 6 months may be the most difficult because late and acute lung changes can arise at that time.

Comprehensive analysis of marker gene detection and computed tomography for the diagnosis of human lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of leading causes of cancer-associated mortality, with a high number of cases caused by metastasis. The early diagnosis of cancer contributes to the successful treatment of patients with lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy of marker gene detection and computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing human lung cancer. Lung cancer marker genes, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRB), cytokeratin fragment 21-1 (Cyfra21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), were analyzed in patients with lung cancer. The tumor size was evaluated using CT, and the association between lung serum levels of marker gene protein expression and tumor size was investigated. A total of 328 patients with lung cancer were identified, including 204 adenocarcinoma, 75 large cell carcinoma and 49 squamous cell carcinoma cases. All patients were indicated to have a high serum level of CEA, CA125, TPA, ProGRB, Cyfra21-1 and NSE, compared with the normal range. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated higher expression levels of CEA, CA125, TPA, ProGRB, Cyfra21-1 and NSE in lung tumor tissues, compared with the normal range. Results indicated that CT was able to diagnose tumor size for patients with lung cancer. The CEA and CA125 expression levels were associated with CT-diagnosed adenocarcinoma tumor size. Large cell carcinoma tumor size was associated with serum levels of CEA, TPA and ProGRB. Results indicated that Cyfra21-1 and NSE were associated with the squamous cell carcinoma cases, as demonstrated using CT. In conclusion, these results indicated that comprehensive analysis of marker gene detection and CT results may be used to diagnose human lung cancer.

Lung Adenocarcinoma: CT Features Associated with Spread through Air Spaces

Purpose To identify the features at CT that are predictive of spread through air spaces (STAS) in surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, presence of STAS was evaluated in 948 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma from April 2015 to December 2016. Patients who were positive for STAS and negative for STAS were matched at a ratio of 1:2 by using patient variables (age, sex, and smoking status). CT features (ie, percentage of solid component, maximum diameter of solid component, lesion density, location, margin, shape, pseudocavity, calcification, central low attenuation, ill-defined peripheral opacity, air bronchogram, satellite lesions, and pleural retraction) were analyzed by using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results The final study population consisted of 276 patients (mean age, 59 years; age range, 32-78 years) including 129 men (mean age, 60 years; age range, 36-78 years) and 147 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 32-78 years). Ninety-two patients were positive for STAS and 184 patients were negative for STAS. STAS was more common in solid tumors (71 of 92; 77%) than in part-solid (21 of 92; 23%) or ground-glass lesions (0 of 92; 0%) (P < .001). STAS was also associated with central low attenuation, ill-defined opacity, air bronchogram, and percentage of solid component (all P < .001). Percentage of solid component was an independent predictor of STAS (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.08) and a cut-off value of 90% showed a discriminatory power with a sensitivity of 89.2% and a specificity of 60.3%. Conclusion Percentage of solid component was independently associated with spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinomas. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Ultracentral Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Single-Institution Experience

INTRODUCTION

Patients with ultracentral lung tumors, whose planning target volume directly contacts or overlaps the proximal bronchial tree, trachea, esophagus, pulmonary vein, or pulmonary artery, may be at higher risk of toxicity when treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We reviewed the outcomes and toxicities of ultracentral lung tumors and compared the results with central lung tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A review of our institutional prospective database of patients treated with lung SBRT from January 2006 to December 2015 was conducted. Patients with central tumors (RTOG 0813 definition) and ultracentral tumors were included.

RESULTS

In total, 180 central and 26 ultracentral tumors were analyzed. The majority of patients received 60 Gy in 8 fractions (53.9%) or 48 Gy in 4 fractions (29.1%). The rates of any grade 2 or higher toxicity were 8.4% (n = 16) in the central group and 7.9% (n = 2) in the ultracentral group (P = .88). There were no observed grade 4 or 5 toxicities. In the nonmetastatic primary lung cancer cohort (n = 182), the median overall survival was 39.4 months versus 23.8 months (P = .40) and cause-specific survival was 55.5 months versus 28.2 months (P = .34) for central and ultracentral tumors, respectively. The 2-year cumulative local, regional, and distant failure rates were 3.3% versus 0 (P = .36), 9.1% versus 5.0% (P = .5), and 17.7% versus 18.7% (P = .63) in the central and ultracentral groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, with strict adherence to planning parameters, SBRT to ultracentral tumors resulted in effective local control and no excessive risk of toxicity compared to central tumors.

Treatment trends in early-stage lung cancer in the United States, 2004 to 2013: A time-trend analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate trends in the use of surgical therapy for patients with early-stage (IA-IIA) non-small cell lung cancer when stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was introduced in the United States.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage IA to IIA non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013, were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to evaluate the change in the proportion of patients undergoing surgery over time. Logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with receipt of surgery compared with radiation.

RESULTS

Of 200,404 eligible patients from 1235 hospitals, 79.8% (n = 159,943) underwent surgery. For all stages combined, the rate of surgery decreased from 83.9% in 2004 to 75.1% in 2013 (P < .0001), with the largest decrease seen in patients with stage IIA: stage IA 86.5% to 77.1% (P < .0001); stage IB 79.6% to 71.5% (P < .0001); and stage IIA 94.7% to 70.3% (P < .001). Patients were more likely to undergo surgery if they were younger and white, had higher income, or had private or Medicare insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2004 to 2013, there was an overall decrease in the use of surgical therapy for lung cancer in early-stage disease. Because resection remains the standard of care for most patients with early-stage disease, these data suggest a potentially significant quality gap in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Nomograms for predicting disease progression in patients of Stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

Objective

Non-local progression is a major concern in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Herein we aimed to create a pre-treatment prognostic nomogram for patients with Stage I NSCLC receiving SBRT.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 182 eligible patients. Patients were randomly divided into a model (70%) group and a validation (30%) group. In the model group, thirteen parameters consisting of patient, treatment, and tumor factors were studied and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent predictors for survival outcome, based on which we developed clinical nomogram. The nomogram was externally validated in the validation group.

Results

Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size (P = 0.011) was the only factor correlated with 2-year overall survival, whereas 2-year locoregional control (LRC) was significantly related to tumor size (P = 0.024) and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (P = 0.044), so does 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (tumor size: P = 0.026; SUVmax: P = 0.038). Nomogram for 2-year LRC and 2-year PFS were created based on aforementioned results. The C-indexes for the nomograms to predict 2-year LRC and PFS were 0.816 and 0.804, respectively, in model group, and were 0.729 and 0.731, respectively, in the validation group. Calibration plots also showed that the model performed well.

Conclusions

Tumor of larger size and higher SUVmax predisposed patients to early onset of locoregional and distant progression. The nomogram developed in our study would be helpful in clinical decision-making and selection of patients who may benefit from more rigorous follow-up and aggressive systemic treatment plan.

A SUVmax-based propensity matched analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: unveiling the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in clinical decision-making

BACKGROUND

The value of maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) was overlooked in current studies comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we aimed to compare the 3-year outcomes based on patients for whom SUV_max were available, and to explore the role of SUV_max in clinical decision-making.

METHODS

From January 2010 to June 2016, data of eligible patients were collected. Patient variables and clinical outcomes were compared in both unmatched and matched groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate analysis was performed for predictors of poor outcome. The relationship between treatment approach and survival outcome was also evaluated in subgroup patients stratified by SUV_max level.

RESULTS

A total of 425 patients treated with either surgery (325) or SBRT (100) were included. Patients receiving SBRT were significantly older, had a higher level of SUV_max and were more likely to have tumor of centrally located. Multivariate analysis showed that SUV_max and tumor size were significant predictors for 3-year OS, LRC, and PFS, while better PFS was also related to peripheral tumor and surgery. The result of PSM analysis also showed that compared to SBRT, surgery could only achieve better PFS. Subgroup analysis indicated that surgery had added advantage of 3-year LRC and PFS for patients in high SUV_max group (SUV_max > 8), but not in low SUV_max group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found a superior PFS after surgery while OS and LRC did not differ between SBRT and surgery. Surgery should be recommended for tumor of high SUV_max.

Dosimetric comparison of CT-guided iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of NSCLC

This study aimed to assess the dosimetric differences between iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An SBT plan and an SBRT plan were generated for eleven patients with T1-2 NSCLC. Prescription of the dose and fractionation (fr) for SBRT was 48Gy/4fr. The planning aim for SBT was D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target volume)≥120Gy. Student’s paired t test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters. The SBT and SBRT plans had comparable PTV D90 (104.73±2.10Gyvs.107.64±2.29Gy), and similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100%) (91.65% vs.92.44%, p = 0.410). The mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150%) for SBT was 64.71%, whereas it was 0% for SBRT. Mean heterogeneity index (HI) deviation for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.73 vs. 0.19 (p<0.0001), and the mean conformity index (CI) for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.77 vs. 0.81 (p = 0.031). The mean lung doses (MLD) in SBT were significantly lower than those in SBRT (1.952±0.713 vs. 5.618±2.009, p<0.0001). In conclusion, compared with SBRT, SBT can generate a comparable dose within PTV, while the organs at risk (OARs) only receive a very low dose. But the HI and CI in SBT were lower than in SBRT.