Post-neoadjuvant strategies in breast cancer: From risk assessment to treatment escalation

Organoid forming potential as complementary parameter for accurate evaluation of breast cancer neoadjuvant therapeutic efficacy

BACKGROUND

13-15% of breast cancer/BC patients diagnosed as pathological complete response/pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy/NST suffer from recurrence. This study aims to estimate the rationality of organoid forming potential/OFP for more accurate evaluation of NST efficacy.

METHODS

OFPs of post-NST residual disease/RD were checked and compared with clinical approaches to estimate the recurrence risk. The phenotypes of organoids were classified via HE staining and ER, PR, HER2, Ki67 and CD133 immuno-labeling. The active growing organoids were subjected to drug sensitivity tests.

RESULTS

Of 62 post-NST BC specimens, 24 were classified as OFP-I with long-term active organoid growth, 19 as OFP-II with stable organoid growth within 3 weeks, and 19 as OFP-III without organoid formation. Residual tumors were overall correlated with OFP grades (P < 0.001), while 3 of the 18 patients (16.67%) pathologically diagnosed as tumor-free (ypT0N0M0) showed tumor derived-organoid formation. The disease-free survival/DFS of OFP-I cases was worse than other two groups (Log-rank P < 0.05). Organoids of OFP-I/-II groups well maintained the biological features of their parental tumors and were resistant to the drugs used in NST.

CONCLUSIONS

The OFP would be a complementary parameter to improve the evaluation accuracy of NST efficacy of breast cancers.

Distinct Prognosis of Minimal Residual Disease According to Breast Cancer Subtype in Patients with Breast or Nodal Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Few studies have reported on patient prognosis according to residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Herein, we evaluated the survival of patients based on residual disease after NAC to identify subpopulations with distinct prognoses.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 728 patients treated with NAC from 2010 to 2017. Patients were divided into four subgroups depending on post-surgical residual disease according to the staging system: pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0/TisN0), minimal residual disease (MRD) (ypT1mi/T1aN0 or ypT0/Tis ypN0i+/N1mic), node-only pCR (≥ ypT1b ypN0), and breast-only pCR (ypT0/Tis ≥ ypN1a). Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were analyzed by adjusting for factors affecting survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 50.4% (n = 367) of patients achieved pCR, with the MRD group accounting for 16.5% (n = 120). Although age and clinical stage were not different among the study groups, histologic grade, subtypes, chemotherapy response, and local treatment showed differences. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) demonstrated no significant difference between the pCR and MRD groups. In the multivariate analysis, pCR status was the only significant factor in EFS, and no statistical difference was noted between the pCR and MRD groups. However, clinical stage, pCR status, and subtype significantly affected the OS. MRD showed favorable outcomes in terms of both EFS and OS in all subtypes, except for those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MRD showed outcomes comparable to those of patients who achieved pCR and may be candidates for de-escalation of post-NAC treatment, except for those with a TNBC subtype.

Change in Main Histological Type of Invasive Breast Cancer From Ductal to Lobular Carcinoma by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

We present a case study of breast cancer initially diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which subsequently substituted into invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). A 61-year-old woman presented with a palpable breast lump, and histological examination through core needle biopsy (CNB) confirmed the presence of IDC. After a 6-month course of NAC, the patient achieved a clinically complete response (cCR) and underwent mastectomy. The surgical specimen showed no detectable tumor upon palpation, but microscopic analysis revealed a highly infiltrative growth of poorly-cohesive small atypical cells in the original tumor area. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the tumor cells were negative for E-cadherin, leading to a diagnosis of ILC. To address the histological discrepancy before and after NAC, we re-evaluated the initial CNB using E-cadherin immunohistochemistry. While most tumor cells were E-cadherin positive, a small area displaying scirrhous subtype-like morphology exhibited E-cadherin negativity. Consequently, we revised the diagnosis to mixed IDC-ILC. The differential chemosensitivity between IDC and ILC may provide insight into this phenomenon.

Safety of Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Importance

The increasing use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has led to substantial pathological complete response rates in patients with initially node-positive, early breast cancer, thereby questioning the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is feasible for axillary staging; however, data on oncological safety are scarce.

Objective

To assess 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent TAD alone or TAD with ALND.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The SenTa study is a prospective registry study and was conducted between January 2017 and October 2018. The registry includes 50 study centers in Germany. Patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer underwent clipping of the most suspicious lymph node (LN) before NST. After NST, the marked LNs and sentinel LNs were excised (TAD) followed by ALND according to the clinician's choice. Patients who did not undergo TAD were excluded. Data analysis was performed in April 2022 after 43 months of follow-up.

Exposure

TAD alone vs TAD with ALND.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Three-year clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Of 199 female patients, the median (IQR) age was 52 (45-60) years. A total of 182 patients (91.5%) had 1 to 3 suspicious LNs; 119 received TAD alone and 80 received TAD with ALND. Unadjusted invasive disease-free survival was 82.4% (95% CI, 71.5-89.4) in the TAD with ALND group and 91.2% (95% CI, 84.2-95.1) in the TAD alone group (P = .04); axillary recurrence rates were 1.4% (95% CI, 0-54.8) and 1.8% (95% CI, 0-36.4), respectively (P = .56). Adjusted multivariate Cox regression indicated that TAD alone was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.34-2.05; P = .69) or death (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.31-3.70; P = .91). Similar results were obtained for 152 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer after NST (invasive disease-free survival: HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.27-5.87; P = .77; overall survival: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.15-3.83; P = .74).

Conclusions and Relevance

These results suggest that TAD alone in patients with mostly good clinical response to NST and at least 3 TAD LNs may confer survival outcomes and recurrence rates similar to TAD with ALND.

Pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Residual tumor cellularity (RTC) and pathologic complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are prognostic factors associated with improved outcomes in breast cancer (BC). However, the majority of patients achieve partial pathologic response (pPR) and no clear correlation between RTC patterns and outcomes was described. Our aims were to define predictive factors for pCR and compare different outcomes of patients with pCR or pPR and with different RTC patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline and post-NAC demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, post-operative data, survival and recurrence status were recorded from our institutional database. A multivariable analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of pCR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Overall, of the 495 patients analyzed, 148 (29.9%) achieved pCR, 347 (70.1%) had pPR, and the median RTC was 40%. Multivariable analysis identified 3 independent factors predictive of pCR: tumor stage before NAC (cT1-2 84.5% versus cT3-4 15.5%), BC sub-type (HER2-positive 54.7% versus triple-negative 29.8% versus luminal-like 15.5%), and vascular invasion (absence 98.0% versus presence 2.0%). We found statistically significant longer DFS, DDFS, and OS in patients with pCR and with RTC <40%; no difference was observed in terms of OS between RTC <40% and RTC ≥40% groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor stage before NAC, BC sub-type, and vascular invasion are significant and independent factors associated with pCR. Patients with pCR and with RTC <40% have longer DFS, DDFS, and OS compared with patients with pPR.

Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study

Background

In triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease at surgery is the most relevant unfavorable prognostic factor. Current guidelines consider the use of adjuvant capecitabine, based on the results of the randomized CREATE-X study, carried out in Asian patients and including a small subset of triple negative tumors. Thus far, evidence on Caucasian patients is limited, and no real-world data are available.

Methods

We carried out a multicenter, observational study, involving 44 oncologic centres. Triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease, treated with adjuvant capecitabine from January 2017 through June 2021, were recruited. We primarily focused on treatment tolerability, with toxicity being reported as potential cause of treatment discontinuation. Secondarily, we assessed effectiveness in the overall study population and in a subset having a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Results

Overall, 270 patients were retrospectively identified. The 50.4% of the patients had residual node positive disease, 7.8% and 81.9% had large or G3 residual tumor, respectively, and 80.4% a Ki-67 >20%. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation was observed only in 10.4% of the patients. In the whole population, at a median follow-up of 15 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 62%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 84.0% and 76.2%, respectively. In 129 patients with a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 43.4%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 78.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Six or more cycles of capecitabine were associated with more favourable outcomes compared with less than six cycles.

Conclusion

The CaRe study shows an unexpectedly good tolerance of adjuvant capecitabine in a real-world setting, although effectiveness appears to be lower than that observed in the CREATE-X study. Methodological differences between the two studies impose significant limits to comparability concerning effectiveness, and strongly invite further research.

End-of-neoadjuvant treatment circulating microRNAs and HER2-positive breast cancer patient prognosis: An exploratory analysis from NeoALTTO

Background

The absence of breast cancer cells in surgical specimens, i.e., pathological complete response (pCR), is widely recognized as a favorable prognostic factor after neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, the presence of disease at surgery characterizes a prognostically heterogeneous group of patients. Here, we challenged circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) at the end of neoadjuvant therapy as potential prognostic biomarkers in the NeoALTTO study.

Methods

Patients treated within the trastuzumab arm (i.e., pre-operative weekly trastuzumab for 6 weeks followed by the addition of weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks; post-operative FEC for 3 cycles followed by trastuzumab up to complete 1 year of treatment) were randomized into a training (n= 54) and testing (n= 72) set. RT-PCR-based high-throughput miRNA profile was performed on plasma samples collected at the end of neoadjuvant treatment of both sets. After normalization, circulating miRNAs associated with event free survival (EFS) were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression model.

Results

Starting from 23 circulating miRNAs associated with EFS in the training set, we generated a 3-circulating miRNA prognostic signature consisting of miR-185-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-22-3p, which was confirmed in the testing set. The 3-circulating miRNA signature showed a C-statistic of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.53-0.71) in the entire study cohort. By resorting to a multivariate Cox regression model we found a statistical significant interaction between the expression values of miR-194-5p and pCR status (p.interaction =0.005) with an estimate Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.83 (95%CI 1.14- 2.95) in patients with pCR, and 0.87 (95%CI 0.69-1.10) in those without pCR. Notably, the model including this interaction along with the abovementioned 3-circulating miRNA signature provided the highest discriminatory capability with a C-statistic of 0.67 (95%CI 0.58-0.76).

Conclusions

Circulating miRNAs are informative to identify patients with different prognosis among those with heterogeneous response after trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment, and may be an exploitable tool to select candidates for salvage adjuvant therapy.

Targeted Sequencing of Plasma-Derived vs. Urinary cfDNA from Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

In breast cancer, the genetic profiling of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood plasma was shown to have good potential for clinical use. In contrast, only a few studies were performed investigating urinary cfDNA. In this pilot study, we analyzed plasma-derived and matching urinary cfDNA samples obtained from 15 presurgical triple-negative breast cancer patients. We used a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to identify and compare genetic alterations in both body fluids. The cfDNA concentration was higher in urine compared to plasma, but there was no significant correlation between matched samples. Bioinformatical analysis revealed a total of 3339 somatic breast-cancer-related variants (VAF ≥ 3%), whereof 1222 vs. 2117 variants were found in plasma-derived vs. urinary cfDNA, respectively. Further, 431 shared variants were found in both body fluids. Throughout the cohort, the recovery rate of plasma-derived mutations in matching urinary cfDNA was 47% and even 63% for pathogenic variants only. The most frequently occurring pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutated genes were NF1, CHEK2, KMT2C and PTEN in both body fluids. Notably, a pathogenic CHEK2 (T519M) variant was found in all 30 samples. Taken together, our results indicated that body fluids appear to be valuable sources bearing complementary information regarding the genetic tumor profile.

Treatment Strategies for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Breast cancer continues to be the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for breast cancer patients with locally advanced disease and patients with poor pathological features, such as triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive subtypes. Neoadjuvant therapy offers several advantages, including better surgical outcomes, early systemic treatment for micro-metastases, and accurate tumor biology and chemosensitivity assessment. Multiple studies have shown that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better prognosis and better treatment outcomes; almost half of such patients may fail to achieve pCR. Tumor proliferative index, hormone receptor (HR) status, and HER2 expression are the major predictors of pCR. Strategies to improve pCR have been dependent on augmenting neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes and dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive tumor, and more recently, immunotherapy for patients with TN disease. The clinical management of patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies and depends mostly on the level of HR expression and HER2 status. Recent data have suggested that switching trastuzumab to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive disease and the addition of capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and HR-negative subtype is associated with a better outcome; both strategies are incorporated into current clinical practice guidelines. This paper reviews available and ongoing studies addressing strategies to better manage patients who continue to have residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

EZH2 Protein Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Exploratory Study of Association With Tumor Response and Prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Neaodjuvant chemotherapy is used to treat high risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Residual cancer burden (RCB) is used to predict risk of relapse after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); however, it cannot predict disease recurrence with certainty. EZH2 is a targetable oncogenic protein overexpressed in TNBC and associated with metastasis and stem cell expansion. We quantified EZH2 protein expression in TNBC before NAC to examine potential utility as a predictive and prognostic biomarker.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 63 patients with localized TNBC treated with NAC. We quantified EZH2 nuclear expression in pretherapy biopsies using a score which included intensity and percent of positive cells at each intensity. EZH2 expression was evaluated as a continuous variable and dichotomized at a score of 210. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine association between EZH2 expression and RCB, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, clinicopathologic features and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between EZH2 score and posttreatment RCB class evaluated as a continuous variable (P=0.831) or dichotomized at 210 (P=0.546). On multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for covariates including RCB, EZH2 >210 was associated with development of metastasis (odds ratio=14.35, 95% confidence interval: 2.69-76.66; P=0.002). Logistic regression was run with EZH2 scores as a continuous variable and increased EZH2 score was associated with metastasis (odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03; P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

In our study of TNBC treated with NAC, high EZH2 expression in pretherapy core biopsies was significantly associated with metastatic recurrence independent of RCB. The potential value of EZH2 as a biomarker to improve stratification of outcome after NAC should be explored further.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Histologic Changes and Clinical Implications

Cytotoxic or endocrine therapy before surgery (neoadjuvant) for breast cancer has become standard of care, affording the opportunity to assess and quantify response in the subsequent resection specimen. Correlation with radiology, cassette mapping, and histologic review with a semi-quantitative reporting system such as residual cancer burden (RCB) provides important prognostic data that may guide further therapy. The tumor bed should be identified histologically, often as a collagenized zone devoid of normal breast epithelium, with increased vasculature. Identification of residual treated carcinoma may require careful high power examination, as residual tumor cells may be small and dyscohesive; features are widely variable and include hyperchromatic small, large, or multiple nuclei with clear, foamy, or eosinophilic cytoplasm. Calculation of RCB requires residual carcinoma span in 2 dimensions, estimated carcinoma cellularity (% area), number of involved lymph nodes, and span of largest nodal carcinoma. These RCB parameters may differ from AJCC staging measurements, which depend on only contiguous carcinoma in breast and lymph nodes.

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

In the treatment of patients with breast cancer, post-neoadjuvant approaches represent an attractive opportunity to improve patient outcomes by stratifying adjuvant treatment according to tumor response. Thus, these concepts represent a step towards our vision of individualized adaptive tumor treatment. Although apparently in its early stages, increasing evidence indicates an important change to our historical treatment strategies.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy enables close monitoring of tumor response in patients with breast cancer. Being able to assess tumor response during treatment provides an opportunity to evaluate new therapeutic strategies. Thus, for triple-negative breast tumors, it was demonstrated that additional immunotherapy could improve prognosis compared with chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy can be escalated or de-escalated correspondingly. The CREATE-X trial randomly assigned HER2-negative patients with residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy to either observation or capecitabine. In HER2-negative patients with positive BRCA testing, the OlympiA study randomly assigned patients to either observation or olaparib. HER2-positive patients without pathologic remission were randomly assigned to trastuzumab or trastuzumab–emtansine within the KATHERINE study. These studies were all able to show an improvement in oncologic outcome associated with the escalation of therapy in patients presenting with residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. On the other hand, this individualization of therapy may also offer the possibility to de-escalate treatment, and thereby reduce morbidity. Among WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR-, HER2-positive patients achieved comparable results without chemotherapy after complete remission following neoadjuvant treatment. In summary, the concept of post-neoadjuvant therapy constitutes a great opportunity for individualized cancer treatment, potentially improving outcome. In this review, the most important trials of post-neoadjuvant therapy are compiled and discussed.

Platinum-based systematic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Due to the lack of definitive hormone receptors, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receive little clinical benefit from endocrine or molecular targeted therapies, leading to a highly aggressive disease with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. In the past decades, chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for TNBC, with taxane/anthracyclines as the representative regimen. However, increasing irreversible cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines and drug-resistance had to be noticed. Gradually, platinum-based chemotherapy has become a topic of interest for researchers. Based on the accumulating studies on platinum-containing regimens for TNBC patients, we will summarize the progress of relevant clinical trials focusing on platinum monotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) or in combination with other therapeutic modalities (e.g., other chemotherapeutic agents, molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy). To further evaluate patient response to platinum and screen for the optimal population to benefit from platinum, we will also analyze current potential biomarkers, such as breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TP53 family and other emerging indicators (e.g., intrinsic subtype, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) expression, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)).

Computer-aided classification of MRI for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Background: To determine suitable optimal classifiers and examine the general applicability of computer-aided classification to compare the differences between a computer-aided system and radiologists in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) from patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed a total of 455 masses and used the U-Net network and ResNet to execute MRI segmentation and pCR classification. The diagnostic performance of radiologists, the computer-aided system and a combination of radiologists and computer-aided system were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: The combination of radiologists and computer-aided system had the best performance for predicting pCR with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.899, significantly higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.700) and computer-aided system alone (AUC: 0.835). Conclusion: An automated classification system is feasible to predict the pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer and can complement MRI.

Precision Medicine and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Directions

Simple Summary

The implementation of precision medicine will revolutionize cancer treatment paradigms. Notably, this goal is not far from reality: genetically similar cancers can be treated similarly. The heterogeneous nature of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) made it a suitable candidate to practice precision medicine. Using TNBC molecular subtyping and genomic profiling, a precision medicine-based clinical trial is ongoing. This review summarizes the current landscape and future directions of precision medicine and TNBC.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer associated with a high recurrence and metastasis rate that affects African-American women disproportionately. The recent approval of targeted therapies for small subgroups of TNBC patients by the US ‘Food and Drug Administration’ is a promising development. The advancement of next-generation sequencing, particularly somatic exome panels, has raised hopes for more individualized treatment plans. However, the use of precision medicine for TNBC is a work in progress. This review will discuss the potential benefits and challenges of precision medicine for TNBC. A recent clinical trial designed to target TNBC patients based on their subtype-specific classification shows promise. Yet, tumor heterogeneity and sub-clonal evolution in primary and metastatic TNBC remain a challenge for oncologists to design adaptive precision medicine-based treatment plans.

Perspectives on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatment Strategies, Unmet Needs, and Potential Targets for Future Therapies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), characterized by the absence or low expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer. TNBC accounts for about 15% of breast cancer cases in the U.S., and is known for high relapse rates and poor overall survival (OS). Chemo-resistant TNBC is a genetically diverse, highly heterogeneous, and rapidly evolving disease that challenges our ability to individualize treatment for incomplete responders and relapsed patients. Currently, the frontline standard chemotherapy, composed of anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes, is commonly used to treat high-risk and locally advanced TNBC. Several FDA-approved drugs that target programmed cell death protein-1 (Keytruda) and programmed death ligand-1 (Tecentriq), poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), and/or antibody drug conjugates (Trodelvy) have shown promise in improving clinical outcomes for a subset of TNBC. These inhibitors that target key genetic mutations and specific molecular signaling pathways that drive malignant tumor growth have been used as single agents and/or in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens. Here, we review the current TNBC treatment options, unmet clinical needs, and actionable drug targets, including epidermal growth factor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and protein kinase B (PKB or AKT) activation in TNBC. Supported by strong evidence in developmental, evolutionary, and cancer biology, we propose that the K-RAS/SIAH pathway activation is a major tumor driver, and SIAH is a new drug target, a therapy-responsive prognostic biomarker, and a major tumor vulnerability in TNBC. Since persistent K-RAS/SIAH/EGFR pathway activation endows TNBC tumor cells with chemo-resistance, aggressive dissemination, and early relapse, we hope to design an anti-SIAH-centered anti-K-RAS/EGFR targeted therapy as a novel therapeutic strategy to control and eradicate incurable TNBC in the future.

Resistance to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathological and Molecular Predictors

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Breast Cancer (BC) has proved useful for the reduction in tumor burden prior to surgery, allowing for a more extensive breast preservation and the eradication of subjacent micrometastases. However, the impact on prognosis is highly dependent on the establishment of Pathological Complete Response (pCR), in particular for Triple Negative (TN) and Hormonal Receptor negative/Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 positive (HR-/HER2+) subtypes. Several pCR predictors, such as PAM50, Integrative Cluster (IntClust), mutations in PI3KCA, or the Trastuzumab Risk model (TRAR), are useful molecular tools for estimating response to treatment and are prognostic. Major evolution events during BC NAC that feature the Residual Disease (RD) are the loss of HR and HER2, which are prognostic of bad outcome, and stemness and immune depletion-related gene expression aberrations. This dynamic nature of the determinants of response to BC NAC, together with the extensive heterogeneity of BC, raises the need to discern the individual and subtype-specific determinants of resistance. Moreover, refining the current approaches for a comprehensive monitoring of tumor evolution during treatment, RD, and eventual recurrences is essential for identifying new actionable alterations and the integral best management of the disease.

Impact of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with N2-3 disease in the de-escalation era: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Reduction of surgeries in axillary has been proved feasible in breast cancer with negative and limited involved axillary lymph nodes. However, for women with a heavy axillary burden, the extent of dissection is still arguable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a total of 7042 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatments between 2008 and 2014, 692 (9.85%) patients with the axillary staging of N2-3M0 were classified into Level I-II dissection group and Level I-III dissection group. 203 pairs of patients were matched by the propensity score.

RESULTS

The positive rate of level-III lymph nodes is 62.4% in patients who underwent Level I-III dissection. There are 67 (22.1%) patients who experienced rise in staging from N2 to N3 due to level-III dissection. With a median follow-up of 62.4 months, no significant difference was observed in RFS (P = 0.897), MFS (P = 0.610) and OS (P = 0.755) between level I-II group and level I-III group. The same results were observed in the independent analysis of neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant subgroups. The binary regression model showed the positivity of level-III is only associated with involved lymph nodes in level-II.

CONCLUSION

Additional level-III dissection has a limited impact on survival but still valuable in an accurate stage. The reduction of surgeries in axillary should be treated with discretion in breast cancer patients with a heavy axillary burden.

Changes in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) during neoadjuvant treatment correlated with patients' survival

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant treatment has been widely used for patients with advanced breast cancer, and pathological complete response (pCR) has been proposed as a surrogate marker. However, more than 50% of patients will not achieve pCR and an appropriate, practical prognostic marker is required for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment for stage I-III disease was performed. Clinicopathological data including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were collected. NLRs were collected serially according to the treatment schedule. Changes in NLRs were calculated, of which the performance capacity as a prognostic factor was evaluated, and a Kaplan-Meier plot was developed and compared with the log rank test RESULTS: Changes in NLRs of each time points of 148 patients were used to assess performance capacity as a prognostic factor for invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and that of shortly prior to the third cycle treatment showed statistical significance. With a cut off value of 0.1258, patients could be divided into high- and low-risk of invasive disease recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves were developed and the log rank test showed that patients in high-risk group after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment were significantly correlated with worse survival outcomes than those in low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Changes in NLRs after neoadjuvant treatment showed statistically significant correlation with patient survival and could categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups. Larger, prospectively designed clinical trials are required to substantiate findings of this study.

Emerging Role of Genomics and Cell-Free DNA in Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Precision Medicine is gaining momentum as the future gold standard healthcare strategy as it enables treatment optimization and consequently a potential improvement for quality of life and survival. This paradigm shift was possible thanks to new high-throughput genomics technologies, which provide prognostic and predictive information on tumor biology and potential treatment options, as standard pathological procedures are unable to capture both spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity. As a result of decreasing costs, both solid and liquid-based genomics have an increasingly important role in clinical trials' screening procedures and are gradually being incorporated into clinical practice. Notwithstanding the great potential, its clinical utility is still a matter of debate and clinicians need to be aware of caveats in interpreting resulting data.

Conversion of immunohistochemical markers and breast density are associated with pathological response and prognosis in very young breast cancer patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Purpose

Patients younger than age 35 that fail to achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) after Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) tend to have worse long term outcomes. The purpose of our study was to assess the correlation between the conversion of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers and breast density and investigate their association with pathological response and prognosis.

Methods

We included 119 patients younger than age 35 who failed to achieve a pCR after NACT in this analysis. We evaluated the clinical and pathological response to NACT by the Union for International Cancer control (UICC) and the Miller-Payne grading (MPG) systems, respectively. A breast density assessment was applied via mammography examination at the time of diagnosis. MPG and breast density (BD) have been combined to define a specific classification of three risk levels to evaluate the prognosis of these patients.

Results

The diameter changes of the tumors and lymph nodes were negatively associated with hormone receptor conversion and positively correlated with Ki67 conversion. A significantly large size change was observed in the groups demonstrating conversion from HER-2 (+) to (−). The variation level of IHC markers was related to MPG and BD and was associated with the survival rate of the patients. Patients with a high breast density and low Miller-Payne grading after NACT had a higher risk of distant metastases or local recurrences.

Conclusion

ER, PR and Ki67 conversion are closely related to MPG, while PR and Ki67 conversion are closely related to BD. While ER and PR conversion are independent and significant predictors of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), HER-2 and Ki67 conversion are only significant for DFS. This risk factor grouping provides a useful index to evaluate the risk of young women with breast cancer who fail to achieve a pCR.