1
|
Bon G, Krasniqi E, Porru M, D'Ambrosio L, Scalera S, Maugeri-Saccà M, Di Lisa FS, Filomeno L, Arcuri T, Botticelli A, Santini D, Fabbri MA, D'Auria G, Pulito C, Blandino G, Marchiò C, Barba M, Ciliberto G, Vici P, Pizzuti L. DARPP-32 and t-DARPP in the development of resistance to anti-HER2 agents. Pre-clinical evidence from the STEP study. Neoplasia 2023; 45:100937. [PMID: 37769528 PMCID: PMC10539861 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
The therapeutic scenario of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been recently enriched by a number of innovative agents, which are reshaping treatment sequence. While randomized trials have documented an advantage in terms of efficacy, for the newly available agents we lack effectiveness and tolerability evidence from the real-world setting. Similarly, the identification of predictive biomarkers might improve clinical decision. We herein describe the outline of a prospective/retrospective study which aims to explore the optimal sequence of treatment in HER2+, pertuzumab pre-treated ABC patients treated in II line with anti-HER2 agents in clinical practice. As part of the pre-clinical tasks envisioned by the STEP study, in vitro cell models of resistance were exploited to investigate molecular features associated with reduced efficacy of HER2 targeting agents at the transcript level. The aggressive behavior of resistant cell populations was measured by growth assessment in mouse models. This approach led to the identification of DARPP-32 and t-DARPP proteins as possible predictive biomarkers of efficacy of anti-HER2 agents. Biomarkers validation and the clinical goals will be reached through patients' inclusion into two independent cohorts, i.e., the prospective and retrospective cohorts, whose setup is currently ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Bon
- Department of Research, Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, Diagnosis and Innovative Technologies, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Manuela Porru
- Department of Research, Diagnosis and Innovative Technologies, Translational Oncology Research Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo D'Ambrosio
- Department of Research, Diagnosis and Innovative Technologies, Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Scalera
- SAFU Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Department of Biology, PhD Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome 00144, Italy
| | | | - Lorena Filomeno
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Arcuri
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Claudio Pulito
- Oncogenomic and Epigenetic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Blandino
- Oncogenomic and Epigenetic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome 00144, Italy.
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, Rome 00144, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Lisa FS, Krasniqi E, Pizzuti L, Barba M, Cannita K, De Giorgi U, Borella F, Foglietta J, Cariello A, Ferro A, Picardo E, Mitidieri M, Sini V, Stani S, Tonini G, Santini D, La Verde N, Gambaro AR, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Garrone O, Sarobba G, Livi L, Meattini I, D’Auria G, Vergati M, Gamucci T, Pistelli M, Berardi R, Risi E, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Rinaldi L, Artale S, Cazzaniga ME, Zustovich F, Cappuzzo F, Landi L, Torrisi R, Scagnoli S, Botticelli A, Michelotti A, Fratini B, Saltarelli R, Paris I, Muratore M, Cassano A, Gianni L, Gaspari V, Veltri EM, Zoratto F, Fiorio E, Fabbri MA, Mazzotta M, Ruggeri EM, Pedersini R, Valerio MR, Filomeno L, Minelli M, Scavina P, Raffaele M, Astone A, De Vita R, Pozzi M, Riccardi F, Greco F, Moscetti L, Giordano M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Zennaro A, Botti C, Pelle F, Cappelli S, Cavicchi F, Vizza E, Sanguineti G, Tomao F, Cortesi E, Marchetti P, Tomao S, Speranza I, Sperduti I, Ciliberto G, Vici P. Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1152123. [PMID: 37260975 PMCID: PMC10227592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease at surgery is the most relevant unfavorable prognostic factor. Current guidelines consider the use of adjuvant capecitabine, based on the results of the randomized CREATE-X study, carried out in Asian patients and including a small subset of triple negative tumors. Thus far, evidence on Caucasian patients is limited, and no real-world data are available. Methods We carried out a multicenter, observational study, involving 44 oncologic centres. Triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease, treated with adjuvant capecitabine from January 2017 through June 2021, were recruited. We primarily focused on treatment tolerability, with toxicity being reported as potential cause of treatment discontinuation. Secondarily, we assessed effectiveness in the overall study population and in a subset having a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results Overall, 270 patients were retrospectively identified. The 50.4% of the patients had residual node positive disease, 7.8% and 81.9% had large or G3 residual tumor, respectively, and 80.4% a Ki-67 >20%. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation was observed only in 10.4% of the patients. In the whole population, at a median follow-up of 15 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 62%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 84.0% and 76.2%, respectively. In 129 patients with a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 43.4%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 78.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Six or more cycles of capecitabine were associated with more favourable outcomes compared with less than six cycles. Conclusion The CaRe study shows an unexpectedly good tolerance of adjuvant capecitabine in a real-world setting, although effectiveness appears to be lower than that observed in the CREATE-X study. Methodological differences between the two studies impose significant limits to comparability concerning effectiveness, and strongly invite further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Oncology Division, Mazzini Hospital, ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elisa Picardo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Mitidieri
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Gambaro
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry and Centre for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Vergati
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Lucia Rinaldi
- “Don Tonino Bello” Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Artale
- Oncology Department, Ospedale di Gallarate, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Marina Elena Cazzaniga
- Phase 1 Research Centre and Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
- Oncology Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Fable Zustovich
- Oncology Division, AULSS 1 Dolomiti, San Martino Medical Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Landi
- Phase I Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosalba Torrisi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scagnoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Fratini
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- Oncology Division, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gianni
- Oncology Unit Rimini, Azienda USL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica Zoratto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | | | - Maria Rosaria Valerio
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Filomeno
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Scavina
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mimma Raffaele
- Presidio Oncologico Cassia – S. Andrea, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- Oncology Division, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roy De Vita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Pozzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Greco
- Medical Oncology Unit, AULSS 9 Regione Veneto, Scaligera - Ospedale Generale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology-Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zennaro
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pelle
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Cavicchi
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS IDI, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Iolanda Speranza
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krasniqi E, Di Lisa FS, Di Benedetto A, Barba M, Pizzuti L, Filomeno L, Ercolani C, Tinari N, Grassadonia A, Santini D, Minelli M, Montemurro F, Fabbri MA, Mazzotta M, Gamucci T, D’Auria G, Botti C, Pelle F, Cavicchi F, Cappelli S, Cappuzzo F, Sanguineti G, Tomao S, Botticelli A, Marchetti P, Maugeri-Saccà M, De Maria R, Ciliberto G, Sperati F, Vici P. The Impact of the Hippo Pathway and Cell Metabolism on Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Her2+ Breast Cancer: The TRISKELE Multicenter Prospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194835. [PMID: 36230758 PMCID: PMC9563553 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The Hippo pathway and its two key effectors, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), are consistently altered in breast cancer. Pivotal regulators of cell metabolism such as the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 (SCD1), and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) are relevant modulators of TAZ/YAP activity. In this prospective study, we measured the tumor expression of TAZ, YAP, AMPK, SCD1, and HMGCR by immunohistochemistry in 65 Her2+ breast cancer patients who underwent trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the immunohistochemical expression of the Hippo pathway transducers and cell metabolism regulators on pathological complete response. Low expression of cytoplasmic TAZ, both alone and in the context of a composite signature identified by machine learning including also low nuclear levels of YAP and HMGCR and high cytoplasmic levels of SCD1, was a predictor of residual disease in the univariate logistic regression. This finding was not confirmed in the multivariate model including estrogen receptor > 70% and body mass index > 20. However, our findings were concordant with overall survival data from the TCGA cohort. Our results, possibly affected by the relatively small sample size of this study population, deserve further investigation in adequately sized, ad hoc prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Sofia Di Lisa
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Benedetto
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or (M.B.); (C.E.); Tel.: +39-0652666762 (M.B.); +39-0652666134 (C.E.)
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorena Filomeno
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiana Ercolani
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or (M.B.); (C.E.); Tel.: +39-0652666762 (M.B.); +39-0652666134 (C.E.)
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- “Sapienza” University of Rome, Polo Pontino, 04011 Aprilia, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Breast Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-IRCCS (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pelle
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Cavicchi
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata, IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS (Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Sperati
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute IRCCS, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chilelli MG, Signorelli C, Giron Berrios JR, Onorato A, Nelli F, Fabbri MA, Primi F, Marrucci E, Virtuoso A, Schirripa M, Mazzotta M, Ruggeri EM. Immune-related Thyroid Dysfunction (irTD) in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Correlates With Response and Survival. Cancer Diagn Progn 2022; 2:55-63. [PMID: 35400002 PMCID: PMC8962849 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no clear information on the proportion of patients who need therapy for immune-related thyroid dysfunction (irTD) or who need to delay, omit, or discontinue immunotherapy. Furthermore, it is not well known whether irTD correlates with better outcomes or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1. RESULTS Our study enrolled 75 patients, 25.3% of them developed immune-related thyroid dysfunction. Three patients delayed a course of immunotherapy due to irTD, 2 patients omitted a course and 1 patient permanently discontinued. In patients with irTD compared with those without irTD the ORR was 42.1% vs. 7.1% (p<0.001), DCR was 78.9% vs. 32.1% (p<0.001); mPFS was 15.7 vs. 3.6 months (p<0.001) and mOS was 18.6 months vs. 5.1 months (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Immune-related thyroid dysfunction has a mild impact on the immunotherapy treatment program. The occurrence of irTD correlates with more favorable response and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Onorato
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Nelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Primi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marrucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Marta Schirripa
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pizzuti L, Krasniqi E, Sperduti I, Barba M, Gamucci T, Mauri M, Veltri EM, Meattini I, Berardi R, Di Lisa FS, Natoli C, Pistelli M, Iezzi L, Risi E, D’Ostilio N, Tomao S, Ficorella C, Cannita K, Riccardi F, Cassano A, Bria E, Fabbri MA, Mazzotta M, Barchiesi G, Botticelli A, D’Auria G, Ceribelli A, Michelotti A, Russo A, Salimbeni BT, Sarobba G, Giotta F, Paris I, Saltarelli R, Marinelli D, Corsi D, Capomolla EM, Sini V, Moscetti L, Mentuccia L, Tonini G, Raffaele M, Marchetti L, Minelli M, Ruggeri EM, Scavina P, Bacciu O, Salesi N, Livi L, Tinari N, Grassadonia A, Fedele Scinto A, Rossi R, Valerio MR, Landucci E, Stani S, Fratini B, Maugeri-Saccà M, De Tursi M, Maione A, Santini D, Orlandi A, Lorusso V, Cortesi E, Sanguineti G, Pinnarò P, Cappuzzo F, Landi L, Botti C, Tomao F, Cappelli S, Bon G, Pelle F, Cavicchi F, Fiorio E, Foglietta J, Scagnoli S, Marchetti P, Ciliberto G, Vici P. PANHER study: a 20-year treatment outcome analysis from a multicentre observational study of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients from the real-world setting. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211059873. [PMID: 35173816 PMCID: PMC8842182 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211059873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The evolution of therapeutic landscape of human epidermal growth factor
receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has led to an unprecedented
outcome improvement, even if the optimal sequence strategy is still debated.
To address this issue and to provide a picture of the advancement of
anti-HER2 treatments, we performed a large, multicenter, retrospective study
of HER2-positive BC patients. Methods: The observational PANHER study included 1,328 HER2-positive advanced BC
patients treated with HER2 blocking agents since June 2000 throughout July
2020. Endpoints of efficacy were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall
survival (OS). Results: Patients who received a first-line pertuzumab-based regimen showed better PFS
(p < 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.004)
than those receiving other treatments. Median PFS and mOS from second-line
starting were 8 and 28 months, without significant differences among various
regimens. Pertuzumab-pretreated patients showed a mPFS and a mOS from
second-line starting not significantly affected by type of second line, that
is, T-DM1 or lapatinib/capecitabine (p = 0.80 and
p = 0.45, respectively). Conversely, pertuzumab-naïve
patients receiving second-line T-DM1 showed a significantly higher mPFS
compared with that of patients treated with lapatinib/capecitabine
(p = 0.004). Median OS from metastatic disease
diagnosis was higher in patients treated with trastuzumab-based first line
followed by second-line T-DM1 in comparison to pertuzumab-based first-line
and second-line T-DM1 (p = 0.003), although these data
might be partially influenced by more favorable prognostic characteristics
of patients in the pre-pertuzumab era. No significant
differences emerged when comparing patients treated with ‘old’ or ‘new’
drugs (p = 0.43), even though differences in the length of
the follow-up between the two cohorts should be taken into account. Conclusion: Our results confirmed a relevant impact of first-line pertuzumab-based
treatment and showed lower efficacy of second-line T-DM1 in
trastuzumab/pertuzumab pretreated, as compared with pertuzumab-naïve
patients. Our findings may help delineate a more appropriate therapeutic
strategy in HER2-positive metastatic BC. Prospective randomized trials
addressing this topic are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Mauri
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit and Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, ‘Ospedali iuniti di Ancona’ Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesca Sofia Di Lisa
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, ‘Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona’ Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Laura Iezzi
- Oncology Division, Hospital ‘Maria SS. dello Splendore’ ASL 4, Giulianova, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | | | - Silverio Tomao
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandra Cassano
- U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale dell’Angelo, Mestre, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana D’Auria
- Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Paola ScavinaSan Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Ceribelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, Rieti, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy
- Oncology, Transplant and New Technologies Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Medical Oncology, AOU Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Gynaecology – Oncology Unit, IRCCS Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Marinelli
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Lucia Mentuccia
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale ‘Parodi-Delfino’, Colleferro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mimma Raffaele
- UOSD Presidio Oncologico Cassia – S. Andrea, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Marchetti
- UOC Oncology, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Olivia Bacciu
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Nello Salesi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti, Latina, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit and Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotrechnological Sciences and Centre for Advanced Studues and Echnology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elisabetta Landucci
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy
- Oncology, Transplant and New Technologies Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Beatrice Fratini
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy
- Oncology, Transplant and New Technologies Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Angela Maione
- Oncology Unit, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Orlandi
- U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Pinnarò
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Landi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Bon
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pelle
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Cavicchi
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- U.O.C. Oncology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Simone Scagnoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- Sperimentazioni di Fase IV, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cognetti F, Masetti R, Fabi A, Bianchi G, Santini D, Rognone A, Catania G, Angelucci D, Naso G, Giuliano M, Vassalli L, Vici P, Scognamiglio G, Generali D, Zambelli A, Colleoni M, Tinterri C, Scanzi F, Vigna L, Scavina P, Gamucci T, Marrazzo E, Scinto AF, Berardi R, Fabbri MA, Pinotti G, Franco D, Terribile DA, Tonini G, Cianniello D, Barni S. PONDx: real-life utilization and decision impact of the 21-gene assay on clinical practice in Italy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:47. [PMID: 33953182 PMCID: PMC8099872 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00246-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinicopathological prognostic features have limited value to identify with precision newly diagnosed patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), who would benefit from chemotherapy (CT) in addition to adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT). The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) assay has been demonstrated to predict CT benefit, hence supporting personalized decisions on adjuvant CT. The multicenter, prospective, observational study PONDx investigated the real-life use of RS® results in Italy and its impact on treatment decisions. Physicians' treatment recommendations (HT ± CT) were documented before and after availability of RS results, and changes in recommendations were determined. In the HR+ HER2- early BC population studied (N = 1738), physicians recommended CT + HT in 49% of patients pre-RS. RS-guided treatment decisions resulted in 36% reduction of CT recommendations. PONDx confirms that RS results provide clinically relevant information for CT recommendation in early-stage BC, resulting in a reduction of more than a third of CT use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cognetti
- Università La Sapienza di Roma, Dipartimento Medicina Clinica e Molecolare, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | - Giulia Bianchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Giuliano
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Vici
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Paola Scavina
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni - Addolorata, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Rossana Berardi
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Torrette, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandro Barni
- ASST BG Ovest Ospedale Treviglio, Treviglio, BG, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nelli F, Fabbri MA, Moscetti L, Sperduti I, Gamucci T, Mansueto G, Signorelli C, Cortesi E, Martelli O, Natoli C, Angelini F, Ruggeri EM. Long-term outcome of pemetrexed maintenance for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world observational cohort study. Recenti Prog Med 2020; 111:761-768. [PMID: 33362173 DOI: 10.1701/3509.34967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pemetrexed maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients not progressing after induction chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES This study is aimed at examine the association of various clinical factor and survival in a real-world cohort analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred ninety-four patients were included and classified as "PM" cohort ("Pemetrexed Maintenance", including patients given with pemetrexed maintenance after induction chemotherapy, n=112), and "noPM" cohort ("no Pemetrexed Maintenance" including those discontinuing pemetrexed, n=82). RESULTS The median PFS was 8.8 and 5.4 months in the PM and noPM cohorts, respectively (p=0.001). The median OS was 19.6 months in the "PM" cohort and 13.2 months in the "noPM" cohort (p<0.02). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 and maintenance therapy were independently associated with improved PFS and OS. A longer median PFS was reported in patients given ≥5 cycles of pemetrexed maintenance (p<0.01). DISCUSSION These results further confirm the survival benefit of pemetrexed maintenance in a real-word population. All eligible advanced NSCLC patients should be strongly considered for at least 5 of pemetrexed maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Nelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy - Outcome Research Network for Evaluation of Treatment Results in Oncology
| | - Maria Agnese Fabbri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Gamucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, SS. Trinità Hospital of Sora, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mansueto
- Department of Medical Oncology, SS. Trinità Hospital of Sora, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Carlo Signorelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Department of Medical Oncology B, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Olga Martelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Angelini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano (Rome), Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Central Hospital of Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bon G, Pizzuti L, Laquintana V, Loria R, Porru M, Marchiò C, Krasniqi E, Barba M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Gamucci T, Berardi R, Livi L, Ficorella C, Natoli C, Cortesi E, Generali D, La Verde N, Cassano A, Bria E, Moscetti L, Michelotti A, Adamo V, Zamagni C, Tonini G, Barchiesi G, Mazzotta M, Marinelli D, Tomao S, Marchetti P, Valerio MR, Mirabelli R, Russo A, Fabbri MA, D'Ostilio N, Veltri E, Corsi D, Garrone O, Paris I, Sarobba G, Giotta F, Garufi C, Cazzaniga M, Del Medico P, Roselli M, Sanguineti G, Sperduti I, Sapino A, De Maria R, Leonetti C, Di Leo A, Ciliberto G, Falcioni R, Vici P. Loss of HER2 and decreased T-DM1 efficacy in HER2 positive advanced breast cancer treated with dual HER2 blockade: the SePHER Study. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2020; 39:279. [PMID: 33302999 PMCID: PMC7731769 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-020-01797-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2-targeting agents have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). Within a short time frame, the rapid introduction of new therapeutics has led to the approval of pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and a taxane in first-line, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line. Thereby, evidence of T-DM1 efficacy following trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination is limited, with data from some retrospective reports suggesting lower activity. The purpose of the present study is to investigate T-DM1 efficacy in pertuzumab-pretreated and pertuzumab naïve HER2 positive ABC patients. We also aimed to provide evidence on the exposure to different drugs sequences including pertuzumab and T-DM1 in HER2 positive cell lines. METHODS The biology of HER2 was investigated in vitro through sequential exposure of resistant HER2 + breast cancer cell lines to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and their combination. In vitro experiments were paralleled by the analysis of data from 555 HER2 + ABC patients treated with T-DM1 and evaluation of T-DM1 efficacy in the 371 patients who received it in second line. Survival estimates were graphically displayed in Kaplan Meier curves, compared by log rank test and, when possibile, confirmed in multivariate models. RESULTS We herein show evidence of lower activity of T-DM1 in two HER2+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab+pertuzumab, as compared to trastuzumab-resistant cells. Lower T-DM1 efficacy was associated with a marked reduction of HER2 expression on the cell membrane and its nuclear translocation. HER2 downregulation at the membrane level was confirmed in biopsies of four trastuzumab/pertuzumab-pretreated patients. Among the 371 patients treated with second-line T-DM1, median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis of advanced disease and median progression-free survival to second-line treatment (mPFS2) were 52 and 6 months in 177 patients who received trastuzumab/pertuzumab in first-line, and 74 and 10 months in 194 pertuzumab-naïve patients (p = 0.0006 and 0.03 for OS and PFS2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our data support the hypothesis that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab reduces the amount of available plasma membrane HER2 receptor, limiting the binding of T-DM1 in cancer cells. This may help interpret the less favorable outcomes of second-line T-DM1 in trastuzumab/pertuzumab pre-treated patients compared to their pertuzumab-naïve counterpart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Bon
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Loria
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Porru
- Area of Translational Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, "Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona" Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University Gabriele D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Nicla La Verde
- Oncology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-PO Fatebenefratelli, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli, University Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Polyclinic University A. Gemelli, University Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Addarii Institute of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Oncology, University Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Marinelli
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, University La Sapienza, Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rosanna Mirabelli
- Department of Ematology & Oncology, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Medical Oncology, Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Enzo Veltri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology AO S. Croce and Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Gynaecology - Oncology Unit, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Carlo Garufi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Pescara Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Marina Cazzaniga
- Research Unit Phase I Trials and Oncology Unit, ASST, Monza, Italy
| | - Pietro Del Medico
- Division of Medical Oncology, Reggio Calabria General Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Institute of General Pathology, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Foundation University A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Leonetti
- Area of Translational Research, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Di Leo
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Rita Falcioni
- Cellular Network and Molecular Therapeutic Target Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fabi A, Russillo M, Ciccarese M, Scagnoli S, Schettini F, Buono G, Russo VL, Arpino G, Rossella R, Sarobba G, Giampaglia M, Pellegrini P, Stani S, Palleschi M, Adamo V, Morelli F, Fabbri MA, Nistico C, Ferretti G, Catania G, Pisegna S, Giannarelli D, Cognetti F. Abstract P5-11-18: Real-world evidence of efficacy and activity of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and post-progression treatments in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: The PALPract study. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-11-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Several randomized clinical trials clearly demonstrated that adding palbociclib (P) to endocrine therapies (ET), such as letrozole (LT) or fulvestrant (FLV), significantly improves outcome both in first-line/endocrine sensitive and second-line/endocrine resistant hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts).
The aims of the present study were to assess efficacy, activity and toxicity of P combined with either LT or FLV in a real world setting, and to study the efficacy and activity of treatments administered after progression to P + ET.
Methods: Records of 245 consecutive HR+/HER2- MBC patients from 14 Italian cancer centers were reviewed in this observational study. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) obtained with P+ET; secondary end-points were overall response rates (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) obtained with P+ET and with post-progression treatments, as well as overall survival (OS), PFS to subsequent treatment lines and post-progression survival (PPS).
Results: Overall 245 pts were treated with P+ET from April 2014. Of them, 116 (47%) received it in first-line setting, 70 (28%) in second-line and the rest (68 pts, 25%) in subsequent lines. Median age was 60 (35-80) years and median ECOG performance status was 0. Seventy-three pts (30%) had more than two metastatic sites and 75 (31%) had visceral metastasis. Ninenty-one (37%) pts received P+LT and 92 (37%) were treated with P+FLV. For 15 (6%) premenopausal pts an LHRH analogue was added to P+ET. In 77 (41%) patients a biopsy of a metastatic lesion was performed.
Among the 116 pts treated in first-line setting, median PFS was 14.7 (95% CI 12.0-17.3) and 15.1 (95%CI 8.6-21.6) months for pts receiving P+LT and P+FLV, respectively. ORR was 48% (95% CI: 39-57%) and CBR was 75% (95% CI, 66-82%). Four (3%) complete responses (CR), 52 (45%) partial responses (PR), 31 (27%) stable disease (SD) and 11 (9%) progression disease (PD) were observed as best response; 18 pts were not yet evaluable. Among the 70 pts treated in second-line setting, median PFS was 10.8 (95%CI 0-24.3) and 7.9 (95%CI 3.3-12.5) months, for pts receiving P+LT and P+FLV, respectively. The ORR was 26% (95% CI: 16-38) and the CBR was 66% (95% CI, 53-76). One CR (1%), 17 PR (24%), 28 SD (40%) and 13 PD (18.5%) were observed as best response, while 9 were not yet evaluable. Best response was achieved after a median of 5 cycle.
At time of the current analysis, 50 pts experienced PD during P+ET. Of them, 38 (76%) received chemotherapy (capecitabine, eribulin, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel+bevacizumab, vinoreline) and 12 (24%) ET. To date, only 5 pts progressed during these therapies, preventing us for evaluating secondary end-points regarding efficacy and activity.
The most frequent adverse event (AE) was grade 3-4 neutropenia (31%), with febrile neutropenia reported in 5 (2%) cases. Main non-hematological AEs were fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea and stypsis).
Conclusions: Our findings confirm the efficacy and safety of P+ET as first/second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- MBC pts, even in a non-selected, real world population. Since data regarding the efficacy and activity of post-progression therapies were not mature at the time of the current analysis, they will be subsequently presented.
Citation Format: Alessandra Fabi, Michelangelo Russillo, Mariangela Ciccarese, Simone Scagnoli, Francesco Schettini, Giuseppe Buono, Vito Lo Russo, Grazia Arpino, Rosalba Rossella, Giuseppina Sarobba, Marianna Giampaglia, Patrizia Pellegrini, Simonetta Stani, Michela Palleschi, Vincenzo Adamo, Francesca Morelli, Maria Agnese Fabbri, Cecilia Nistico, Gianluigi Ferretti, Giovanna Catania, Simona Pisegna, Diana Giannarelli, Francesco Cognetti. Real-world evidence of efficacy and activity of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and post-progression treatments in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: The PALPract study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Francesco Schettini
- 4Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Buono
- 5Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Grazia Arpino
- 5Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gamucci T, Pizzuti L, Natoli C, Mentuccia L, Sperduti I, Barba M, Sergi D, Iezzi L, Maugeri-Saccà M, Vaccaro A, Magnolfi E, Gelibter A, Barchiesi G, Magri V, D'Onofrio L, Cassano A, Rossi E, Botticelli A, Moscetti L, Omarini C, Fabbri MA, Scinto AF, Corsi D, Carbognin L, Mazzotta M, Bria E, Foglietta J, Samaritani R, Garufi C, Mariani L, Barni S, Mirabelli R, Sarmiento R, Graziano V, Santini D, Marchetti P, Tonini G, Di Lauro L, Sanguineti G, Paoletti G, Tomao S, De Maria R, Veltri E, Paris I, Giotta F, Latorre A, Giordano A, Ciliberto G, Vici P. A multicenter REtrospective observational study of first-line treatment with PERtuzumab, trastuzumab and taxanes for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer patients. RePer Study. Cancer Biol Ther 2018; 20:192-200. [PMID: 30403909 PMCID: PMC6343690 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1523095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We carried out a retrospective observational study of 264 HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients to explore the efficacy of first-line treatment with pertuzumab/trastuzumab/taxane in real-world setting. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves and log rank test. Median follow-up, length of pertuzumab/trastuzumab/taxane treatment and of pertuzumab, trastuzumab maintenance were 21, 4 and 15 months, respectively. The response rate was 77.3%, and the clinical benefit rate 93.6%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 21 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. When comparing patients by trastuzumab-pretreatment, similar PFS were observed, although a longer OS was reached in trastuzumab-naïve patients (p = 0.02). Brain metastases at baseline and their development in course of therapy were associated with significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.0006) and shorter OS, although at a not fully statistically relevant extent (p = 0.06). The addition of maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) to pertuzumab/trastuzumab maintenance was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.0001), although no significant differences were detected in OS (p = 0.31). Results were confirmed by propensity score analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.46, respectively). In multivariate models, longer PFS was related to lower Performance Status (PS) (p = 0.07), metastatic stage at diagnosis (p = 0.006) and single metastatic site (p < 0.0001). An OS advantage was observed with lower PS (p < 0.0001), single metastatic site (p = 0.004), no prior exposure to trastuzumab (p = 0.004) and response to pertuzumab-based treatment (p = 0.003). Our results confirm that trastuzumab/pertuzumab/taxane is the standard of care as first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive ABC even in the real-world setting. Moreover, the double-maintenance therapy (HER2 block and ET) is strongly recommended when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Gamucci
- a Medical Oncology Unit , ASL Frosinone , Frosinone , Italy.,b Medical Oncology , Sandro Pertini Hospital , Roma , Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- d Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences , Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT , Chieti , Italy
| | | | - Isabella Sperduti
- e Bio-Statistics Unit , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy.,f Scientific Direction , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Domenico Sergi
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Laura Iezzi
- d Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences , Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT , Chieti , Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy.,f Scientific Direction , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Angela Vaccaro
- a Medical Oncology Unit , ASL Frosinone , Frosinone , Italy
| | | | - Alain Gelibter
- g Medical Oncology Unit , Policlinico Umberto I , Rome , Italy
| | | | - Valentina Magri
- g Medical Oncology Unit , Policlinico Umberto I , Rome , Italy
| | - Loretta D'Onofrio
- h Department of Oncology , University Campus Biomedico of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- i Department of Medical Oncology , Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" , Rome , Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- i Department of Medical Oncology , Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" , Rome , Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- j Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine , "Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- k Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology , University Hospital of Modena , Modena , Italy
| | - Claudia Omarini
- k Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology , University Hospital of Modena , Modena , Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Corsi
- m Medical Oncology Unit , San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital , Rome , Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- n U.O.C. Oncology , University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata , Verona , Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- j Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine , "Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- n U.O.C. Oncology , University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata , Verona , Italy
| | - Jennifer Foglietta
- o Department of Medical Oncology , University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital , Perugia , Italy
| | | | - Carlo Garufi
- q Division of Medical Oncology , Pescara Hospital , Pescara , Italy
| | - Luciano Mariani
- r HPV Unit, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Sandro Barni
- s Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit , ASST Bergamo Ovest , Treviglio , Italy
| | - Rosanna Mirabelli
- t Department of Hematology & Oncology , Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio , Catanzaro , Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Graziano
- v Medical Oncology Unit , SS Annunziata Hospital , Chieti , Italy.,w Breast Medical Oncology Unit , G. Bernabeo Hospital , Ortona , Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- h Department of Oncology , University Campus Biomedico of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- j Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine , "Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- h Department of Oncology , University Campus Biomedico of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Luigi Di Lauro
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- x Department of Radiation Oncology , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Giancarlo Paoletti
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- g Medical Oncology Unit , Policlinico Umberto I , Rome , Italy
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- y Institute of General Pathology , Catholic University of the Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy
| | - Enzo Veltri
- z Oncology Unit , S. Maria Goretti Hospital , Latina , Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- aa Gynecology Oncology Unit , Catholic University of the Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- ab Department of Medical Oncology , "Giovanni Paolo II" Institute , Bari , Italy
| | - Agnese Latorre
- ab Department of Medical Oncology , "Giovanni Paolo II" Institute , Bari , Italy
| | - Antonio Giordano
- ac Center for Biotechnology , Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, College of Science and Technology, Temple University , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- f Scientific Direction , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- c Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pizzuti L, Sergi D, Sperduti I, Lauro LD, Mazzotta M, Botti C, Izzo F, Marchetti L, Tomao S, Marchetti P, Natoli C, Grassadonia A, Gamucci T, Mentuccia L, Magnolfi E, Vaccaro A, Cassano A, Rossi E, Botticelli A, Sini V, Sarobba MG, Fabbri MA, Moscetti L, Astone A, Michelotti A, De Angelis C, Bertolini I, Angelini F, Ciliberto G, Maugeri-Saccà M, Giordano A, Barba M, Vici P. Body mass index in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Cancer Biol Ther 2018; 19:328-334. [PMID: 29336662 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1416938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence emerged from the TOURANDOT trial encourages evaluating the role of anthropometric determinants on treatment outcomes in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-including regimens. We thus analyzed data from a subgroup of these patients from a larger cohort previously assessed for treatment outcomes. Patients were included in the present analysis if body mass index values had been recorded at baseline. Clinical benefit rates, progression free survival and overall survival were assessed for the overall study population and subgroups defined upon molecular subtype. One hundred ninety six patients were included (N:196). Body mass index showed no impact on clinical benefit rates in the overall study sample and in the luminal cancer subset (p = 0.12 and p = 0.79, respectively), but did so in the triple negative subgroup, with higher rates in patients with body mass index ≥25 (p = 0.03). In the overall study sample, body mass index did no impact progression free or overall survival (p = 0.33 and p = 0.67, respectively). Conversely, in triple negative patients, progression free survival was significantly longer with body mass index ≥25 (6 vs 14 months, p = 0.04). In this subset, overall survival was more favorable (25 vs 19 months, p = 0.02). The impact of the molecular subtype was confirmed in multivariate models including the length of progression free survival, and number of metastatic sites (p < 0.0001). Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings in more adequately sized, ad hoc, prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pizzuti
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Domenico Sergi
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- b Biostatistics Unit and Clinical Trial Center, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Luigi Di Lauro
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Marco Mazzotta
- c Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- d Department of Surgery , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Fiorentino Izzo
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Luca Marchetti
- e Division of Medical Oncology, Villa San Pietro Hospital , Rome , Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- f Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies , La "Sapienza" University of Rome , Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- c Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- g Department of Medical , Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT, G. D'Annunzio University , Chieti , Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- g Department of Medical , Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT, G. D'Annunzio University , Chieti , Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- h Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone , Frosinone , Italy
| | | | | | - Angela Vaccaro
- h Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone , Frosinone , Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- i Department of Medical Oncology , Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- i Department of Medical Oncology , Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy
| | | | - Valentina Sini
- c Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Sant'Andrea , Rome , Italy.,j Oncology Unit , ASL Roma 1, Santo Spirito Hospital , Rome , Italy
| | | | - Maria Agnese Fabbri
- l Division of Oncology, Complesso Ospedaliero Belcolle, AUSL Viterbo , Viterbo , Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- m Division of Medical Oncology , Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena , Modena , Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- e Division of Medical Oncology, Villa San Pietro Hospital , Rome , Italy.,i Department of Medical Oncology , Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- n Oncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana , Pisa , Italy
| | - Claudia De Angelis
- n Oncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana , Pisa , Italy
| | - Ilaria Bertolini
- n Oncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana , Pisa , Italy
| | - Francesco Angelini
- o Medical Oncology Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital , Albano, Rome , Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- p Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy.,p Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonio Giordano
- q Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine e del Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University , Philadelphia , USA
| | - Maddalena Barba
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy.,p Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- a Division of Medical Oncology 2 , IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moscetti L, Fabbri MA, Natoli C, Vici P, Gamucci T, Sperduti I, Iezzi L, Iattoni E, Pizzuti L, Roma C, Vaccaro A, D’Auria G, Mauri M, Mentuccia L, Grassadonia A, Barba M, Ruggeri EM. Fulvestrant 500 milligrams as endocrine therapy for endocrine sensitive advanced breast cancer patients in the real world: the Ful500 prospective observational trial. Oncotarget 2017; 8:54528-54536. [PMID: 28903361 PMCID: PMC5589600 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The observational prospective trial herein presented aimed at evaluating the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in the treatment of endocrine sensitive advanced breast cancer patients from the real world setting. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and tolerability. One hundred sixty three patients were enrolled. At a median follow up of 20 months, the 61% of patients reached CBR, whose median duration was 10.8 months. Median PFS and OS were 7 and 35 months, respectively. Endocrine sensitive patients showed better PFS and OS. No relevant toxicity appeared when analyzing safety data. In multivariate analysis, visceral involvement, endocrine sensitivity and previous endocrine therapy were prognostic factor for PFS, whereas endocrine sensitivity and metastasis at diagnosis had prognostic relevance for OS. Estrogen receptor expression >50%, single metastatic site, and no prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease were predictive of CBR. In this prospective trial, fulvestrant 500 mg appeared to be a safe and active treatment and confirmed its efficacy in the daily clinical practice. A high percent expression of estrogen receptors (above 50%) was associated with higher CBR. Treatment was very well tolerated. Endocrine sensitivity had a major impact on treatment outcome. As expected, patients who had received first-line endocrine therapy for advanced disease exhibited worse outcome and a lower CBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sammartinese, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Maria Agnese Fabbri
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sammartinese, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Roma, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03100 Frosinone, Italy
| | | | - Laura Iezzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Elena Iattoni
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Roma, Italy
| | - Carmine Roma
- Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Vaccaro
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03100 Frosinone, Italy
| | - Giuliana D’Auria
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sammartinese, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Mariella Mauri
- Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Mentuccia
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03100 Frosinone, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Roma, Italy
| | - Enzo Maria Ruggeri
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sammartinese, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moscetti L, Mentuccia L, Vici P, Quadrini S, Sperduti I, Pizzuti L, Fabbri MA, Vaccaro A, Maugeri-Saccà M, Barba M, Sergi D, Zampa G, Gamucci T. ESAS and FACT-B in eribulin-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a multicenter, prospective and observational study. Future Oncol 2017; 13:1517-1525. [PMID: 28429617 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Quality of life (QoL) is a critical issue for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin mesylate represents a novel and active drug for pretreated MBC. Regretfully, few data exploring health-related (HR) QoL are available in unselected populations. PATIENTS & METHODS A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in 50 MBC patients treated with eribulin mesylate, in order to evaluate HRQoL and patients' well-being by using the Edmonton symptoms assessment scale (ESAS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast questionnaires. RESULTS A significant ESAS score improvement was observed with a 10% median decrease. No differences were revealed for the QoL scores. CONCLUSION The analysis of ESAS and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scores showed that eribulin mesylate contributes to preserve QoL in MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.,Department of Oncology & Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Vici
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Agnese Fabbri
- Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.,Scientific Direction, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.,Scientific Direction, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Sergi
- Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Germano Zampa
- Medical Oncology Unit 'Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital', Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruggeri EM, Fabbri MA, Nelli F. Should We Use Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy? J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3223. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.67.5132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fabrizio Nelli
- Ospedale Belcolle, L'Azienda Sanitaria Locale Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fabbri MA, Marchetti P, Cortesi E, Santini D, Gamucci T, Angelini F, Sperduti I, Longo F, Pellegrino A, Milano A, Quadrini S, Mancini ML, Primi F, Nelli F, Ratta R, Ruggeri E. Abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy: A “real life” retrospective analysis of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to duration of androgen deprivation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
337 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent, selective androgen (CYP17) biosynthesis inhibitor, which showed to improve overall survival in mCRPC pts progressing after docetaxel. Few data are available concerning the clinical outcome of AA treatment in mCRPC in terms of the duration of prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this retrospective analysis we assessed the PFS and OS in patients affected with mCRPC according to the duration of ADT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of pts affected by mCRCP progressive after chemotherapy who received AA (1000 mg/d) plus prednisone (5 mg/twice daily). A total of 189 pts were included in the analysis, 71 received AA with ADT duration<12 months (Group A) and 118 received AA with ADT duration ≥ 12 months (Group B). Patient characteristics’ in the two treatment groups (A VS B) were: median age: 75 vs 69 years, Gleason score ≥7: 96% vs 92%; median PSA at AA start 47 (range 36-2130) vs 32 (range 85-2100), No of metastatic sites: 1 : 70% vs 75% ;bone only 50% vs 47%, visceral disease alone: 3% vs 5%; symptomatic disease : 58% vs 40% (p 0.02); median number of prior docetaxel courses: 6 in both groups; second-line cabazitaxel:14% in both groups, bisphosphonates concomitant treatment 66% vs 52.5% (p:0.21). No difference in radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy were evidenced Results: At a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 1-51) the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the median overall survival (OS) were 10 months (95% CI: 7-13) and 26 months (95% CI: 17-35) respectively in all mCRPC. Group B patients had a statistically significant longer PFS (13 vs 7 months, p=0.009) and OS (28 vs 17 months, p=0.03 months). The median decrease in the PSA level > 50% was observed in 50 % of pts in both groups. AA was well tolerated and no relevant toxicity were observed Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed a benefit in terms of PFS and OS in group B patients, our finding might be related to the best prognostic factors of patients in group B (less symptomatic).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Enrico Cortesi
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Isabella Sperduti
- Bio-Statistics Unit Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mansueto G, De Tursi M, Ratta R, Fabbri MA, Quadrini S, Salesi N, Rozzi A, Sperduti I, Ciancola F, Gamucci T. Cabazitaxel after Docetaxel in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant, prostate cancer (mCRPC): A prospective, observational study about toxicity profile and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e16054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Oncology and Neurosciences, Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Bio-Oncologia, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Nello Salesi
- S.M. Goretti Hospital; Oncology Center Giorgio Porfiri Latina, Latina, Italy
| | - Antonio Rozzi
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Bio-Statistics Unit Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Italy, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gamucci T, Mentuccia L, Quadrini S, Moscetti LI, Vici P, Sperduti I, Pizzuti L, Franco D, Giampaolo MA, Fabbri MA. Quality of life (QoL) and symptoms evaluation in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) treated with eribulin: Preliminary results of a prospective observational study. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e12031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12031 Background: Eribulin (E) is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor currently indicated for third-line chemotherapy (CHT) of MBC. To evaluate its tolerability and impact on QoL and symptoms improvement in MBC pts, from April 2012, we conducted a prospective observational study. Methods: Pts pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) who has received 2 CHT lines for MBC, scheduled to be treated with E were considered eligible. Pts complete the Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS) at each cycle and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) every 2 cycles. Outcome of QoL included the FACT-B total score, FACT-General (FACT-G) score and the Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score. Groups of data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Friedman test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival calculation. Overall Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Results: 25 consecutive MBC pts entered the study. Median age 65 (range 31-77), PS (ECOG) 0-1 96%, 24% had triple-negative MBC, 70% ER/PgR positive and 5% HER2 positive. All pts were pretreated with A and T, 19 (76%) also with capecitabine. Median cycles 6 (range 3-13), 36% received more than 6 cycles. Five pts are to early for evaluation. Of the 20 evaluable pts main toxicity were: alopecia G1 58% and G2 42%, asthenia G2 40% peripheral neuropathy G2 25% neutropenia G2 0% and G3-G4 10%.At a median follow-up of 6 months 16% of pts achieved partial response (PR) 44% stable disease (SD) and 20% progressive disease; disease control rate (PR+SD ≥ 6 m) occurred in 40% of pts. Median PFS is 5 m (95% CI, 4-6) currently 70% of pts are alive. Data of ESAS and QoL are reported in table. Conclusions: Our preliminary results shows that treatment with E is associated with a significant improvement of ESAS scores (p=0.03) mainly in responders pts (p=0.02) and with a good maintenance of QoL with expected and manageable toxicities. Data collection is ongoing and update results will be presented. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Patrizia Vici
- Medical Oncology Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Bio-Statistics Unit Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Franco
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Garassino MC, Martelli O, Bettini A, Floriani I, Copreni E, Lauricella C, Ganzinelli M, Marabese M, Broggini M, Veronese S, Gherardi G, Longo F, Fabbri MA, Tomirotti M, Alabiso O, Sarobba MG, Labianca R, Marsoni S, Farina G, Scanni A. TAILOR: A phase III trial comparing erlotinib with docetaxel as the second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with wild-type (wt) EGFR. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.18_suppl.lba7501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA7501 Background: While the benefit of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations has been widely established, their value in treating patients with wt EGFR is still debated. To assess the role of erlotinib in these patients, we performed an independent multicenter phase III trial (Tarceva Italian Lung Optimization Trial [TAILOR] NCT00637910), comparing erlotinib to docetaxel in second line treatment, having overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) as principal and secondary endpoints, respectively. Methods: EGFR and KRAS mutational status were assessed by direct sequencing in all eligible patients; only patients with wt EGFR NSCLC (exons 19 and 21) at progression, and previously treated with a first line platinum-based regimen, were randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 mg daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (3-weekly) or 35 mg/m2 (weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. To detect an hazard ratio of 0.67 (2-sided 5% significance level for the log-rank test and a power of 80%), 199 events were required for both OS and PFS evaluation. Results: On the planned analysis date (March 30, 2012), 221 patients had been randomized and 218 were evaluable (docetaxel 110, erlotinib 108; three major violations excluded). At a median follow-up of 20 months, 199 relapses and 157 deaths were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier PFS curves showed a highly significant increase favoring docetaxel (HR 0.70 with 95% CI 0.53-0.94; p = 0.016) over erlotinib regimen. The HR translated into an estimated absolute difference in 6-months PFS of 12% (16% vs 28%). Data concerning toxicity were consistent with the literature. Conclusions: In terms of PFS, our results indicate a clear superiority of docetaxel over erlotinib as second line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations in exons 19 or 21. Analysis of OS will be conducted as far as the planned number of 199 deaths is reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olga Martelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Irene Floriani
- Laboratory of Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Copreni
- Laboratory of Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Calogero Lauricella
- Stuttura Complessa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda-Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Ganzinelli
- Pathology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| | - Mirko Marabese
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Broggini
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Veronese
- Pathology Department Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gherardi
- Pathology Department Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| | - Flavia Longo
- Medical Oncology Department Policlinico Umberto I La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Tomirotti
- UO Oncologia Medica Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Oscar Alabiso
- Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera “Maggiore della Carita”, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Labianca
- Oncology Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Farina
- U.O. Oncologia Medica, A.O. Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Scanni
- Oncology Department, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Garassino MC, Martelli O, Bettini A, Floriani I, Copreni E, Lauricella C, Ganzinelli M, Marabese M, Broggini M, Veronese S, Gherardi G, Longo F, Fabbri MA, Tomirotti M, Alabiso O, Sarobba MG, Labianca R, Marsoni S, Farina G, Scanni A. TAILOR: Phase III trial comparing erlotinib with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with wild-type (wt) EGFR. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.lba7501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA7501 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4, 2012, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olga Martelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Irene Floriani
- Laboratory of Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Copreni
- Laboratory of Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Calogero Lauricella
- Stuttura Complessa di Anatomia Patologica, Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda-Cà Granda, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Ganzinelli
- Pathology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| | - Mirko Marabese
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Broggini
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Veronese
- Pathology Department Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milano, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gherardi
- Pathology Department Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| | - Flavia Longo
- Medical Oncology Department Policlinico Umberto I La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Tomirotti
- UO Oncologia Medica Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Oscar Alabiso
- Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera “Maggiore della Carita”, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Labianca
- Oncology Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Farina
- U.O. Oncologia Medica, A.O. Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Scanni
- Oncology Department, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fabbri MA, Moscetti L, Nelli F, Gamucci T, Mansueto G, Narducci F, Quadrini S, Sperduti I, Passaro A, Campenni G, Cortesi E, Martelli O, Bianchetti S, Angelini F, Pellegrino A, Pavese I, Signorelli C, Ruggeri EM. The predictive value of clinical variables in patients affected with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with pemetrexed (PEM) plus platinum-based regimen: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e18065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18065 Background: PEM plus platinum–based regimen is a standard of care in chemonaïve advanced non-squamous NSCLC pts. This retrospective multicenter analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of clinical variables for PFS in an unselected population. Methods: Data were obtained by reviewing the clinical data of pts affected with advanced NSCLC treated from 2009 to 2011. 193 pts were retrieved. Main characteristics were: median age: 63 years (range 33-79); male/female (M/F): 67%/33%; ECOG PS 0-1: 97%; weight loss >5%: 34%; current smoker 31%. Stage IV disease: 81% ; ≥ 1 site of metastasis: 79%. Brain metastasis: 28% of pts at diagnosis. Results: All 193 pts are evaluable for analysis. 158 pts (82%) received the cisplatin- and 35 pts (18%) the carboplatin-based regimen. Most pts received at least 2 cycles of therapy and 21% received PEM maintenance treatment. The overall disease control rate observed was 69%. (CR+PR = 44%, SD 25%). At a median follow-up of 6.7 months (range 1-22), the median PFS was 6 months (95%CI 5-7) with a 1 year-PFS rate of 16.8%. In the Cox multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with a statistically significant longer PFS were: gender (M vs F, HR 1.68, C.I.95% 1.19-2.38; p=0.003); no. of metastatic site (>1 vs 1, HR 1.6, 95%CI 1.07-2.40; p=0.02); type of response (CR/PR vs no response, HR 2.74, 95%CI 1.95-3.86; p<0.0001); and maintenance treatment (no vs yes, HR 2.74, 95%CI 1.95-3.86; p=0.02). The Kaplan-Meyer analysis of 1-year PFS confirmed female gender (F vs M 24.4% vs 12.2%, log-rank p=0.01), objective response (CR/PR vs SD/PD 29.9% vs 5.2%, log-rank p<0.0001), and maintenance therapy (yes vs no 30% vs 17.3%, log-rank p=0.01) as the significant clinical variables predictive of longer survival. Conclusions: According to our data only female gender, responsive disease and subsequent maintenance therapy were independent predictive factors. No difference in term of PFS outcome were found for elderly pts, presence of brain metastases and weight loss at diagnosis. Overall survival data will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Enrico Cortesi
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Olga Martelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Bianchetti
- Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | | | | | - Ida Pavese
- UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grande R, Cosimelli M, Gemma D, Ciancola F, Corsi DC, Rossi L, Sperduti I, Fabbri MA, Mancini R, Ruggeri E, Longo F, Quadrini S, Zampa G, Bianchetti S, Gamucci T. Evaluation of relapse-free survival in T3N0 colon cancer: The role of chemotherapy—A multicentric retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e14082 Background: Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC) is still under debate. Choice should be based on patients (pts) and disease characteristics. According to worldwide guidelines AC should be considered in high-risk (H) T3N0 pts. No data are available for better option in low-risk (L) pts. Aim of the study is to evaluate relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) retrospectively in T3N0 CC pts related to treatment. Methods: RFS and DFS are evaluated with Kaplan Meier method. In order to find the optimal cut off for node number the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and Maximally Selected Rank Statistics were performed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression, enter limit and remove limit were p = 0.10 and p = 0.15 respectively. Results: 1,000 pts with T3N0 CC were recruited. To date, data of 926 pts are available. Median age was 69 (29-93), M/F 513/413, Grading 1/2/3 46/668/158; 360 L (39%), 411 H (44%), 155 unknown (17%); 137 (15%) pts showed symptoms (S) at diagnosis: 51 pts had perforation (P) or bowel obstruction (BO). Median sampled lymph nodes (LN) were 15 (1-76); 383 (41%) pts were treated with AC. Median follow up (fu) was 5 years (yr) (range 3-24). Survival analysis was performed only for pts with a minimum fu of 3 yr and younger than 80 (80%). 5 yr RFS was 78% and 5 yr DFS was 76% At multivariate analysis S and AC were prognostic factors for RFS. AC is prognostic factor for all endpoints (data are shown in table). In L group 5 yr RFS was 88% in treated pts and 75% in non-treated pts (p 0.03); in H group was respectively 82% and 72% (p 0.006). Conclusions: Preliminary data confirmed the role of known prognostic factors and suggest the relevance of AC also in L stage II T3N0 CC pts. However, the highest risk in L subgroup should be identified to be submitted to AC. Data collection is ongoing, update results will be presented. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Domenico C. Corsi
- Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorena Rossi
- Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Flavia Longo
- Medical Oncology Department Policlinico Umberto I La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Sara Bianchetti
- Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Moscetti L, Fabbri MA, Sperduti I, Mansueto G, Fariello AM, Gamucci T, Battista M, Loffreda M, Pompei L, Ruggeri E. Temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance in patients with primary brain cancer treated with postoperative TMZ plus radiotherapy (RT): A retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12514 Background: A systematic review of patients affected with primary brain cancer treated with post-operative TMZ+RT and TMZ maintenance was undertaken in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity in an unselected population. Methods: Ninety-nine patients were detected. Main characteristics were: median age 62 years (range 28-80); M/F: 58/41; PS 0/1: 92 pts; complete resection: 20; subtotal resection: 75, biopsy only: 4. The median RT dose delivered was 60 Gy (range 40-60 Gy). All the 99 pts received TMZ at 75 mg/m2 concomitantly to RT. Maintenance therapy with TMZ was given to non progressive pts, starting 6 weeks after chemoradiation, at the dose of 150 mg/m2 for the 1st cycle and 200 mg/m2 q 4 weeks d. 1-5 for subsequent cycles and continued until disease progression or intolerance. Results: Patients with evaluable disease (n=79 pts) had an overall response rate of 16% (12 partial response and 1 complete response), while a stable disease was observed in 49/79 pts (62%). Maintenance TMZ was given to 77/99 pts (78%). Hematologic toxicities (CTCAE v.3) include: Gr. 3/4 neutropenia (4%), febrile neutropenia (1%), Gr. 3/4 thrombocytopenia (13%), Gr. 3 anemia (1%). One pt developed a bone marrow aplasia and another one a Steven-Johnson syndrome recovered after high supportive treatment. Toxicities caused discontinuation of TMZ in 9 patients (11%). At 2-yrs, at both univariate and multivariate analysis, a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and in overall survival (OS) was observed in pts completely resected and in pts achieving a response or a stable disease >6 months. In pts achieving a response and in pts completely resected the HR for the 2-yrs PFS was 0.06 (95%CI 0.03-0.11, p<0.0001) and 0.02 (95%CI 0.01-0.04, p<0.0001), respectively. For the 2-yrs OS the HR was 0.08 (95%CI 0.04-0.16, p<0.001) and 0.02 (95%CI 0.01-0.06, p<0.0001). No difference was observed for sex, age, PS and histology. Conclusions: Complete resection, response or prolonged stabilization to maintenance TMZ are factors associated with a statistically improvement in OS and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michle Battista
- Department of Radiotherapy Ospedale SS Trinità Sora - Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy
| | | | - Luciano Pompei
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fabbri MA, Nelli F, Moscetti L, Cortesi E, Gamucci T, Sperduti I, Franco D, Pavese I, Grande R, Alesini D, Ruggeri E. Progression-free survival (PFS) with maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (B) in patients with responding mCRC after first-line chemotherapy (CT) plus B. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
612 Background: Maintenance treatment with B is considered an option for mCRC pts in responding pts after a first line CT + B, but few data are available on its real benefit on PFS. Methods: We collected data from a cohort of mCRC pts consecutively treated in five oncologic centers of Lazio. One-hundred-ninety-nine mCRC pts treated with first line CT + B achieving a response [partial (PR) or complete (CR)] or a stable disease (SD) were considered eligible, 117 pts had received B maintenance (BM) whereas 82 did not (noBM). The two groups were homogeneous for main characteristics. First-line therapy in the BM vs noBM group included FOLFIRI regimen (96 vs 59 pts), FOLFOX (18 vs 22 pts) and FUFA (3 vs 1 pts). K-ras status was analyzed in 115 pts with an higher percentage of wild-type (wt) in the BM group (65 vs 50 pts, p= 0.04). A CR or PR have been achieved in 65% of pts in the BM group and 61% of noBM group, while a SD was observed in 35% and 39% of pts respectively for the BM and noBM group. The median number of BM cycles administered was 7 (range 3-25). Effectiveness measures included the PFS duration. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression (forward selection) Results: At a median follow-up of 18 months (1-109), the median PFS was 13 months (C.I.95%: 11-15) vs 8 months (C.I.95%: 7-10; p<0.0001, and the 1-year PFS 53% vs 28% for BM and noBM respectively. Pts with CR/PR had a mPFS of 15 months (CI 95% 12-19) vs 10 months (CI 95% 10-12) p=0.004 and a 1-year PFS of 62.6% vs 33.7% for the BM vs noBM group respectively. No difference in the 1-year PFS was observed in pts showing SD to chemotherapy and bevacizumab. The mPFS in these patients was 12 (CI 95% 10-13) vs 8 months (CI 95% 7-10, p=0.11) for the BM and noBM group respectively. The multivariate analysis did not show any difference in PFS comparing age, sex, number and site of metastasis, ECOG PS and k ras status. A significant difference in PFS was observed for response to first-line CT (CR/PR vs SD, p=0.002) and for BM vs noBM (p=0.003). Conclusions: The maintenance strategy with B shows a longer PFS in pts responding to the first line chemotherapy + B whereas for pts who achieving an SD no difference was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Agnese Fabbri
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Nelli
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Daniela Franco
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Ida Pavese
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Roberta Grande
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Daniele Alesini
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Enzo Ruggeri
- UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; Ospedale Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; UOC Oncologia Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Università la Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Grande R, Cosimelli M, Gemma D, Ciancola F, Corsi DC, Rossi L, Sperduti I, Fabbri MA, Mancini R, Ruggeri E, Zampa G, Bianchetti S, Gamucci T. Evaluation of relapse-free survival in T3N0 colon cancer: The role of chemotherapy—A multicentric retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
578 Background: Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage II colon cancer (CC) is still under debate. Choice should be based on patients (pts) and disease characteristics. According to worldwide guidelines AC should be considered in high-risk (H) T3N0 pts. No data are available for better option in low-risk (L) pts. Aim of the study is to evaluate relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) retrospectively in T3N0 CC pts related to treatment. Methods: RFS and DFS are evaluated with Kaplan Meier method. In order to find the optimal cut off for node number the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and maximally selected rank statistics were performed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression, enter limit and remove limit were p = 0.10 and p = 0.15 respectively. Results: 1,000 pts with T3N0 CC were recruited. To date, data of 764 pts are available. Median age was 68 (29-93), M/F 42/344, grading 1/2/3 40/561/132; 303 L (40%), 356 H (46%), 105 unknown (14%); 121 (16%) pts showed symptoms (S) at diagnosis: 43 pts had perforation (P) or bowel obstruction (BO). Median sampled lymph nodes (LN) were 15 (1-76); 339 (44%) pts were treated with AC. Median follow up (fu) was 5 years (yr) (range 3-24). Survival analysis analysis was performed only for pts with a minimum fu of 3 yr and younger than 80 (79%). 5 yr RFS was 79% and 5 yr DFS was 77%. At multivariate analysis S, LN and AC were prognostic factors for RFS. AC is prognostic factor for all endpoints (Table). In L group 5 yr RFS was 88% in treated pts and 71% in non-treated pts (p 0.004); in H group was respectively 84% and 70% (p 0.002). Conclusions: Preliminary data confirmed the role of known prognostic factors and suggest the relevance of AC also in L stage II T3N0 CC pts. However, the highest risk in L subgroup should be identified to be submitted to AC. Data collection is ongoing. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Grande
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cosimelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Donatello Gemma
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Ciancola
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Domenico C. Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Lorena Rossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Maria Agnese Fabbri
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Raffaello Mancini
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Enzo Ruggeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Germano Zampa
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Sara Bianchetti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, Frosinone, Italy; Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy; Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; UO Oncologia, AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UO Oncologia, ASUL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy; UOSA Oncologia ASL RM/A, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit Regina Apostolorum, Albano Laziale, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Iacovelli R, Palazzo A, Conte D, Fabbri MA, Vitolo D, Cortesi E. Dermatomyositis as first clinical appearance for a thymic epidermoid cell carcinoma. Acta Biomed 2010; 81:68-71. [PMID: 20857855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Primary thymic carcinoma is a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours of the anterior mediastinum that includes different histological types. Frequently, it first comes to clinical attention through paraneoplastic syndromes such as dermatomyositis. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with several episodes of fever and chest pain in the previous 5 months. The patient was admitted to the Rheumatology Department with a peri-ungual erythema and papular lesions on both sides of each hand and alteration at biochemistry tests. A left deltoid muscle biopsy specimen showed a histological pattern compatible with the diagnosis of dermatomyositis. A computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, showed a solid mass in the upper anterior mediastinal area and a mediastinoscopy with mass-biopsy was performed. Only the immunohistochemical staining technique allowed a definitive histological diagnosis. We report the diagnostic challenge and the therapeutic approach of thymic neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Iacovelli
- Department of Experimental Medicine; "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Masi G, Vasile E, Loupakis F, Cupini S, Fornaro L, Baldi G, Salvatore L, Cremolini C, Stasi I, Brunetti I, Fabbri MA, Puglisi M, Trenta P, Granetto C, Chiara S, Fioretto L, Allegrini G, Crinò L, Andreuccetti M, Falcone A. Randomized trial of two induction chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 103:21-30. [PMID: 21123833 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a randomized trial with a median follow-up of 18.4 months, 6 months of induction chemotherapy with a three-drug regimen comprising 5-fluorouracil (by continuous infusion)-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in response rate, radical surgical resection of metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with 6 months of induction chemotherapy with fluorouracil-leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). METHODS From November 14, 2001, to April 22, 2005, we enrolled 244 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. To evaluate if the superiority of FOLFOXIRI is maintained in the long term, we updated the overall and progression-free survival data to include events that occurred up to February 12, 2009, with a median follow-up of 60.6 months. We performed a subgroup and a risk-stratified analysis to examine whether outcomes differed in specific patient subgroups, and we analyzed the results of treatment after progression. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS FOLFOXIRI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median progression-free survival (9.8 vs 6.8 months, HR for progression = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.76, P < .001) and median overall survival (23.4 vs 16.7 months, HR for death = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.96, P = .026) with a 5-year survival rate of 15% (95% CI = 9% to 23%) vs 8% (95% CI = 4% to 14%). The improvements in progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, in overall survival were evident even when the analysis excluded patients who received radical resection of metastases. With regard to the risk-stratified analysis, FOLFOXIRI results in longer progression-free survival and overall survival than FOLFIRI in all risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Six months of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI is associated with a clinically significant improvement in the long-term outcome compared with FOLFIRI with an absolute benefit in survival at 5 years of 7%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Masi
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 Universitaria - Polo Oncologico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma, 67 - 56126 Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gazzaniga P, Naso G, Gradilone A, Cortesi E, Gandini O, Gianni W, Fabbri MA, Vincenzi B, di Silverio F, Frati L, Aglianò AM, Cristofanilli M. Chemosensitivity profile assay of circulating cancer cells: prognostic and predictive value in epithelial tumors. Int J Cancer 2010; 126:2437-47. [PMID: 19821489 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The prognostic value associated with the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer by the CellSearch technology raise additional issues regarding the biological value of this information. We postulated that a drug-resistance profile of CTCs may predict response to chemotherapy in cancer patients and therefore could be used for patient selection. One hundred 5 patients with diagnosis of carcinoma were enrolled in a prospective trial. CTCs were isolated from peripheral blood, and positive samples were evaluated for the expression of a panel of genes involved in anticancer drugs resistance. The drug-resistance profile was correlated with disease-free survival (DFS; patients in adjuvant setting) and time to progression (TTP; metastatic patients) in a 24-months follow-up. Objective response correlation was a secondary end point. Fifty-one percent of patients were found positive for CTCs while all blood samples from healthy donors were negative. The drug-resistance profile correlates with DFS and TTP (p < 0.001 in both). Sensitivity of the test: able to predict treatment response in 98% of patients. Specificity of the test: 100%; no sample from healthy subject was positive for the presence of CTCs. Positive and negative predictive values were found to be 96.5 and 100%, respectively. We identified a drug-resistance profile of CTCs, which is predictive of response to chemotherapy, independent of tumor type and stage of disease. This approach may represent a first step toward the individualization of chemotherapy in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Gazzaniga
- Dipartimento Medicina Sperimentale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale Regina Elena 324, Roma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|