Response to the Letter to the Editor by Susan Thorpe et al.: How predictive are in vitro assays for cytokine release syndrome in vivo? A comparison of methods reveals worrying differences in sensitivity and frequency of response

Is an in vitro whole blood cytokine assay useful to detect the potential risk of severe infusion reaction of monoclonal antibody pharmaceuticals?

After the life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in the clinical study of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody (mAb) TGN1412, in vitro cytokine release assays using human blood cells have been proposed for non-clinical evaluation of the potential risk of CRS. Two basic assay formats are frequently used: human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with immobilized mAbs, and whole blood with aqueous mAbs. However, the suitability of the whole blood cytokine assay (WBCA) has been questioned, because an unrealistically large sample size would be required to detect the potential risk of CRS induced by TGN1412, which has low sensitivity. We performed a WBCA using peripheral blood obtained from 68 healthy volunteers to compare two high risk mAbs, the TGN1412 analogue anti-CD28 superagonistic mAb (CD28SA) and the FcγR-mediated alemutuzumab, with a low risk mAb, panitumumab. Based on the cytokine measurements in this study, the sample size required to detect a statistically significant increase in cytokines with 90% power and 5% significance was determined to be n = 9 for CD28SA and n = 5 for alemtuzumab. The most sensitive marker was IL-8. The results suggest that WBCA is a practical test design that can warn of the potential risk of FcγR-mediated alemtuzumab and T-cell activating CD28SA but, because there was apparently a lower response to CD28SA, it cannot be used as a risk-ranking tool. WBCA is suggested to be a helpful tool for identifying potential FcγR-mediated hazards, but further mechanistic understanding of the response to CD28SA is necessary before applying it to T cell-stimulating mAbs.

Cytokine release assays for the prediction of therapeutic mAb safety in first-in man trials--Whole blood cytokine release assays are poorly predictive for TGN1412 cytokine storm

The therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) TGN1412 (anti-CD28 superagonist) caused near-fatal cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in all six volunteers during a phase-I clinical trial. Several cytokine release assays (CRAs) with reported predictivity for TGN1412-induced CRS have since been developed for the preclinical safety testing of new therapeutic mAbs. The whole blood (WB) CRA is the most widely used, but its sensitivity for TGN1412-like cytokine release was recently criticized. In a comparative study, using group size required for 90% power with 5% significance as a measure of sensitivity, we found that WB and 10% (v/v) WB CRAs were the least sensitive for TGN1412 as these required the largest group sizes (n = 52 and 79, respectively). In contrast, the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) solid phase (SP) CRA was the most sensitive for TGN1412 as it required the smallest group size (n = 4). Similarly, the PBMC SP CRA was more sensitive than the WB CRA for muromonab-CD3 (anti-CD3) which stimulates TGN1412-like cytokine release (n = 4 and 4519, respectively). Conversely, the WB CRA was far more sensitive than the PBMC SP CRA for alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) which stimulates FcγRI-mediated cytokine release (n = 8 and 180, respectively). Investigation of potential factors contributing to the different sensitivities revealed that removal of red blood cells (RBCs) from WB permitted PBMC-like TGN1412 responses in a SP CRA, which in turn could be inhibited by the addition of the RBC membrane protein glycophorin A (GYPA); this observation likely underlies, at least in part, the poor sensitivity of WB CRA for TGN1412. The use of PBMC SP CRA for the detection of TGN1412-like cytokine release is recommended in conjunction with adequately powered group sizes for dependable preclinical safety testing of new therapeutic mAbs.

Cytokine release assays: current practices and future directions

As a result of the CD28 superagonist biotherapeutic monoclonal antibody (TGN 1412) "cytokine storm" incident, cytokine release assays (CRA) have become hazard identification and prospective risk assessment tools for screening novel biotherapeutics directed against targets having a potential risk for eliciting adverse pro-inflammatory clinical infusion reactions. Different laboratories may have different strategies, assay formats, and approaches to the reporting, interpretation, and use of data for either decision making or risk assessment. Additionally, many independent contract research organizations (CROs), academic and government laboratories are involved in some aspect of CRA work. As a result, while some pharmaceutical companies are providing CRA data as part of the regulatory submissions when necessary, technical and regulatory practices are still evolving to provide data predictive of cytokine release in humans and that are relevant to safety. This manuscript provides an overview of different approaches employed by the pharmaceutical industry and CROs, for the use and application of CRA based upon a survey and post survey follow up conducted by ILSI-Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Immunotoxicology Committee CRA Working Group. Also discussed is ongoing research in the academic sector, the regulatory environment, current limitations of the assays, and future directions and recommendations for cytokine release assays.