Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696: a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure

Impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition (ARNI) in improving ejection fraction and left and right ventricular remodeling in heart failure

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), a new therapeutic class of agents acting on the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) and neutral endopeptidase system has been developed in treatment of ventricular remodeling and has attracted considerable attention. The first in class is LCZ696, which is a molecule that combines Valsartan (ARB) and Sacubitril (neprilysin inhibitor) within a single substance. Sacubitril-Valsartan is the first angiotensin receptor enkephalin inhibitors (ARNI), which can block angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) while inhibiting enkephalin (NEP) and effectively reverse ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients. It has been recommended by the European and American authoritative guidelines on heart failure as Class I for the treatment of chronic heart failure particularly as intensive care medicine. Sacubitril-Valsartan demonstrated significant effects in improving left ventricular performance and remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Sacubitril acts on increased levels of circulating natriuretic peptides by preventing their enzymatic breakdown and Valsartan, which acts to lessen the effects of the RAAS. However, not more research has been done on its effects on the right ventricle remodeling. This review aimed to assess the impact of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors on left and right ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition (Sacubitril/Valsartan) Reduces Structural Arterial Stiffness in Middle-Aged Mice

BACKGROUND

Increasing arterial stiffness is a prominent feature of the aging cardiovascular system. Arterial stiffening leads to fundamental alterations in central hemodynamics with widespread detrimental implications for organ function resulting in significant morbidity and death, and specific therapies to address the underlying age-related structural arterial remodeling remain elusive. The present study investigates the potential of the recently clinically available dual angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) to counteract age-related arterial fibrotic remodeling and stiffening in 1-year-old mice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Treatment of in 1-year-old mice with ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan), in contrast to angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy (valsartan) and vehicle treatment (controls), significantly decreases structural aortic stiffness (as measured by in vivo pulse-wave velocity and ex vivo aortic pressure myography). This phenomenon appears, at least partly, independent of (indirect) blood pressure effects and may be related to a direct antifibrotic interference with aortic smooth muscle cell collagen production. Furthermore, we find aortic remodeling and destiffening due to ARNI treatment to be associated with improved parameters of cardiac diastolic function in aged mice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preclinical mechanistic evidence indicating that ARNI-based interventions may counteract age-related arterial stiffening and may therefore be further investigated as a promising strategy to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly.

Unveiling Wide Spectrum Therapeutic Implications and Signaling Mechanisms of Valsartan in Diverse Disorders: A Comprehensive Review

Valsartan is an orally active non-peptide angiotensin receptor antagonist, an effective and well-tolerated anti-hypertensive drug. Besides its antihypertensive action, it has clinical implications in many other disorders, like heart failure (HF), arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetic complications (DM), atherosclerosis, etc. Besides angiotensin receptor blocking activity, valsartan reduces circulating levels of biochemical markers, such as hs-CRP, which is responsible for its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activity. Moreover, valsartan also acts by inhibiting or inducing various signalling pathways, such as inducing autophagy via the AKT/mTOR/S6K pathway or inhibiting the TLR/NF-kB pathway. The current review exhaustively discusses the therapeutic implications of valsartan with specific emphasis on the mechanism of action in various disorders. The article provides a detailed spectrum of the therapeutic profile of valsartan and will likely be very useful to researchers working in the relevant research areas.

Practical Recommendations for the Use of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors (ARNI) in Heart Failure: Insights from Indian Cardiologists

Heart failure is a significant public health concern characterized by notable rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite the presence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), its utilization remains inadequate. This practical recommendation paper focuses on the utilization of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) as a pivotal treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). The recommendations presented in this paper have been developed by a group of cardiologists in India who convened six advisory board meetings to discuss the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure. The paper emphasizes the importance of accurate biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure, particularly N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which are commonly used. Additionally, the paper advocates the use of imaging, specifically echocardiography, in diagnosing and monitoring heart failure patients. Moreover, the paper highlights the role of ARNI in heart failure management, with numerous clinical trials that have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, enhancing quality of life, and diminishing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. This practical recommendation paper offers valuable insights into the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure, aiming to enhance the implementation of GDMT and ultimately alleviate the burden of heart failure on society.

Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Definition and Diagnosis

The Korean Society of Heart Failure guidelines aim to provide physicians with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure (HF). In Korea, the prevalence of HF has been rapidly increasing in the last 10 years. HF has recently been classified into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Moreover, the availability of newer therapeutic agents has led to an increased emphasis on the appropriate diagnosis of HFpEF. Accordingly, this part of the guidelines will mainly cover the definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis of HF.

Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Definition and Diagnosis

The Korean Society of Heart Failure guidelines aim to provide physicians with evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure (HF). In Korea, the prevalence of HF has been rapidly increasing in the last 10 years. HF has recently been classified into HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF), HF with mildly reduced EF, and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Moreover, the availability of newer therapeutic agents has led to an increased emphasis on the appropriate diagnosis of HFpEF. Accordingly, this part of the guidelines will mainly cover the definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis of HF.

Assessing clinical and biomarker characteristics to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure

Of the various medical therapies for heart failure (HF), sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor that combines sacubitril, a pro-drug that is further metabolized to the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitrilat, and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker valsartan. Inhibition of neprilysin and blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor with sacubitril/valsartan increases vasoactive peptide levels, increasing vasodilation, natriuresis, and diuresis. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to classify HF, to assist with clinical decision-making, for patient selection in HF clinical trials, and to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in HF. However, as HF is a complex syndrome that occurs on a continuum of overlapping and changing phenotypes, patient classification based solely on LVEF becomes problematic. LVEF measurement can be imprecise, have low reproducibility, and often changes over time. LVEF may not accurately reflect inherent disease heterogeneity and complexity, and the addition of alternate criteria to LVEF may improve phenotyping of HF and help guide treatment choices. Sacubitril/valsartan may work, in part, by mechanisms that are not directly related to the LVEF. For example, this drug may exert antifibrotic and neurohumoral modulatory effects through inhibition or activation of several signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss markers of cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, systemic inflammation; activation of neurohormonal pathways, including the natriuretic system and the sympathetic nervous system; the presence of comorbidities; patient characteristics; hemodynamics; and HF signs and symptoms that may all be used to (1) better understand the mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan and (2) help to identify subsets of patients who might benefit from treatment, regardless of LVEF.

Short-Term Effects of Sacubitrilvalsartan on Echocardiographic Parameters in Dogs With Symptomatic Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease

Background and Objective: Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) is an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor that works by inhibiting the neprilysin enzyme as well as blocking angiotensin receptors. The benefits of using SV in congestive heart failure patients has been demonstrated in several clinical trials; however, limited data are available for dogs with heart failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of SV in comparison with ramipril in the standard therapy of symptomatic dogs suffering from myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD).

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-blind study, 21 dogs with MMVD stage C were randomly assigned to received SV (20 mg/kg orally twice a day) or ramipril (0.125 mg/kg, orally once a day) in addition to pimobendan and furosemide. Echocardiography, electrocardiography, blood pressure, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and urinary aldosterone per creatinine ratio were obtained at baseline (D0) and at follow-up (4 weeks).

Results: When comparing the percent change from baseline between groups, the left atrium to aortic root ratio (LA/Ao) and left ventricular internal diameter diastole normalized to body weight (LVIDDN) were significantly reduced in the SV group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). The end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and stroke volume were lower in the SV group (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). No changes were observed between groups for NTproBNP, blood pressure, ECG parameters, and urinary aldosterone per creatinine ratio.

Conclusion: The current study suggested that the short-term effects of SV can reverse myocardial remodeling, as inferred from several echocardiographic indices (i.e., the reduction in LA/Ao, LVIDDN, EDVI and ESVI) in dogs with MMVD stage C. These findings would support the use of SV in clinically symptomatic heart failure in dogs.

Acute on chronic heart failure-Which variations on B-type natriuretic peptide levels?

OBJECTIVE

Natriuretic peptides are useful diagnostic and prognostic markers in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute shortness of breath. However, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level represents a single snapshot in time, while changes relative to a patient's baseline may be useful in risk stratification. We aimed to define the variation of BNP levels between chronic stable and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) that is associated with significant clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort chart review study of chronic heart failure (HF) patients followed in an outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Inclusion criteria were available hospital and clinic BNP levels and at least 1 year of follow-up care. ADHF was defined as a hospital admission for acute HF. Dry BNP was defined as its concentration after >3 months of optimal treatment and no variations in New York Heart Association class. Dry BNP was compared to the BNP at a subsequent ED visit that was associated with hospitalization because of ADHF.

RESULTS

Overall, 253 patients were included. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) dry BNP was 191(83-450) pg/mL. There were 67 ADHF admissions, occurring 15 ± 15 months after patient's dry BNP was established. At subsequent ED admission, the median (IQR) BNP was 1505 (72-2620) pg/mL. Patients requiring inpatient admission had a BNP ∼250% higher than their stable BNP (404 vs 164 pg/mL, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of chronic stable HF patients, a doubling of BNP was observed in patients who required hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. BNP doubling may represent a useful parameter to reflect clinically relevant acute decompensated HF.

Effect of sacubitril valsartan on cardiac function and endothelial function in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to observe the effect of sacubitril valsartan on cardiac function and vascular endothelial function in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with HFrEF were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 40 patients in each group. Sacubitril valsartan was added to the conventional treatment in the observation group, and perindopril was added to the conventional treatment in the control group. Both groups were treated continuously for 12 weeks. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), flow-mediated vasodilatory function (FMD) of the brachial artery, and levels of plasma Ang II, endothelin 1 (ET-1), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), together with the serum nitric oxide (NO) and NO synthase (NOS) were compared before and after treatment in the groups.

RESULTS

Before the treatment, the levels of LVEF, LVEDD, FMD, Ang II, ET-1, CGRP, NO, and NOS in the observation group were not significantly different from those in the control group (P > 0.05). However, the levels of LVEF, FMD, CGRP, NO, and NOS in both groups were significantly higher after the treatment than those before the treatment (P < 0.05) and significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the levels of LVEDD, Ang II, and ET-1 in both groups decreased significantly after the treatment (P < 0.05) and were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sacubitril valsartan might improve endothelial function while increasing cardiac function in HFrEF patients.

Renal protection in chronic heart failure: focus on sacubitril/valsartan

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and increases the risk of overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in decreasing mortality in patients with CHF, CKD hampers the optimization of standard pharmacologic therapy for heart failure. Therefore, other treatment options are needed to optimize treatment outcomes in CHF patients with CKD. The first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan, has a complementary activity that counteracts the potential unwanted long-term effects of over-activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of CV mortality compared to standard therapy with an ACE-I in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the PARADIGM-HF trial and has been shown to be safe and effective in a broad range of HFrEF patients. However, data on the efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with more advanced CKD are limited. This review discusses the evidence for the role of sacubitril/valsartan in providing additional renal benefit in patients with HFrEF. Data from clinical trials and real-world experience in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD support the benefits of dual angiotensin/neprilysin inhibition across the breadth of kidney disease stages, including patients with significant renal impairment that was not reported in the pivotal PARADIGM-HF trial, and suggests a central role for the cardiac benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in nephroprotection.

Tumour suppression through modulation of neprilysin signaling: A comprehensive review

Peptidases are emerging as promising drug targets in tumour suppression. Neprilysin, also known as neutral endopeptidase, is a cell surface peptidase that degrades various peptides such as angiotensin II, endothelin I, Substance P, etc., and reduces their local concentration. Neprilysin is expressed in various tissues such as kidney, prostate, lung, breast, brain, intestine, adrenal gland, etc. The tumour-suppressor mechanisms of neprilysin include its peptidase activity that degrades mitogenic growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor-2 and insulin-like growth factors, and the protein-protein interaction of neprilysin with phosphatase and tensin homolog, focal adhesion kinase, ezrin/radixin/moesin, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Studies have shown that the levels of neprilysin play an important role in malignancies. NEP is downregulated in prostate, renal, lung, breast, urothelial, cervical, hepatic cancers, etc. Histone deacetylation and hypermethylation of the neprilysin promoter region are the common mechanisms involved in the downregulation of neprilysin. Downregulation of the peptidase promotes angiogenesis, cell survival and cell migration. This review presents an overview of the role of neprilysin in malignancy, the tumour suppression mechanisms of neprilysin, the epigenetic mechanisms responsible for downregulation of neprilysin, and the potential pharmacological approaches to upregulate neprilysin levels and its activity.

LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) protects against cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity in rats: Role of neprilysin inhibition and lncRNA TUG1 in ameliorating apoptosis

Cyclophosphamide (CP) is widely used as chemotherapy in various cancers; however, testicular atrophy has been encountered as an associated adverse effect. Oxidative stress, enhanced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and subsequent apoptosis are involved in the molecular mechanisms of CP-induced testicular toxicity. In addition to the cardiovascular benefits of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan (VAL)), neprilysin inhibition was shown to mediate Ca²⁺ sequestration inside the ER. Furthermore, long noncoding RNA taurine-upregulated gene 1 (lncRNA TUG1) was shown to ameliorate apoptosis in various diseases. This tempted us to investigate the possible benefit of LCZ696 against CP-induced testicular dysfunction in rats through neprilysin inhibition axis, and the downstream apoptotic cascade, with highlighting the impact of lncRNA TUG1 in regulating testicular toxicity. Sixty adult male Wistar rats were randomly allocated as control, LCZ696, VAL, CP, CP + LCZ696, and CP + VAL. Testicular atrophy was induced by single-dose injection of CP (200 mg/kg; i.p.). LCZ696 treated group received LCZ696 (30 mg/kg; p.o.) for 6 days, with CP (200 mg/kg; i.p.) single-dose on day 5. LCZ696 increased lncRNA TUG1 expression, improved sperm characteristics, hormonal profile, testicular function, antioxidant defences, and Bcl-2. The histopathological picture and reduced oxidative and ER stress markers, aligned with declined Bax, caspase-3 and the expression of CHOP, PUMA, Noxa, Bim, and p53, with a subtle superior effect over VAL-treated group. In conclusion, the current study highlights the promising impact of LCZ696 in ameliorating chemotherapy-induced testicular atrophy; yet, further investigation regarding longer duration and different doses of LCZ696 is warranted.

Effect of Neprilysin Inhibition on Various Natriuretic Peptide Assays

BACKGROUND

With sacubitril/valsartan treatment, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations increase; it remains unclear whether change in BNP concentrations is similar across all assays for its measurement. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentrations in patients are unknown. Lastly, the impact of neprilysin inhibition on mid-regional pro-ANP (MR-proANP), N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), proBNP_1-108, or C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on results from different natriuretic peptide assays.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive stable patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction were initiated and titrated on sacubitril/valsartan. Change in ANP, MR-proANP, BNP (using 5 assays), NT-proBNP (3 assays), proBNP_1-108, and CNP were measured over 3 visits.

RESULTS

Average time to 3 follow-up visits was 22, 46, and 84 days. ANP rapidly and substantially increased with initiation and titration of sacubitril/valsartan, more than doubling by the first follow-up visit (+105.8%). Magnitude of ANP increase was greatest in those with concentrations above the median at baseline (+188%) compared with those with lower baseline concentrations (+44%); ANP increases were sustained. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan led to inconsistent changes in BNP, which varied across methods assessed. Concentrations of MR-proANP, NT-proBNP, and proBNP_1-108 variably declined after treatment; whereas CNP concentrations showed no consistent change.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation and titration of sacubitril/valsartan led to variable changes in concentrations of multiple natriuretic peptides. These results provide important insights into the effects of sacubitril/valsartan treatment on individual patient results, and further suggest the benefit of neprilysin inhibition may be partially mediated by increased ANP concentrations.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America: This statement does not represent an update of the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for incident heart failure and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with established disease. Secular trends in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and heart failure forecast a growing burden of disease and underscore the need for effective therapeutic strategies. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the shared pathophysiology between diabetes mellitus and heart failure, the synergistic effect of managing both conditions, and the potential for diabetes mellitus therapies to modulate the risk of heart failure outcomes. This scientific statement on diabetes mellitus and heart failure summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and impact of diabetes mellitus and its control on outcomes in heart failure; reviews the approach to pharmacological therapy and lifestyle modification in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure; highlights the value of multidisciplinary interventions to improve clinical outcomes in this population; and outlines priorities for future research.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure, A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and Heart Failure Society of America

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for incident heart failure and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with established disease. Secular trends in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and heart failure forecast a growing burden of disease and underscore the need for effective therapeutic strategies. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the shared pathophysiology between diabetes mellitus and heart failure, the synergistic effect of managing both conditions, and the potential for diabetes mellitus therapies to modulate the risk of heart failure outcomes. This scientific statement on diabetes mellitus and heart failure summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and impact of diabetes mellitus and its control on outcomes in heart failure; reviews the approach to pharmacological therapy and lifestyle modification in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure; highlights the value of multidisciplinary interventions to improve clinical outcomes in this population; and outlines priorities for future research.

Sacubitril/valsartan treatment improved the clinical outcome and reduced the hospitalization rate in three patients with chronic heart failure: a case series

Sacubitril/valsartan was shown to be effective in improving the clinical outcome and reducing hospitalization rate and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Here we report a case series of three patients with HFrEF associated with mitral insufficiency (case #1), dilated cardiomyopathy (case #2) and chronic ischaemia (case #3). The first case was a 49 year old male and the further two were 70 year old male patients. After previous ineffective treatment, the administration of sacubitril/valsartan led to a rapid and marked improvement of the clinical conditions in all three cases. Moreover, in two patients, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy avoided a surgical intervention for the insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. In the third patient, sacubitril/valsartan interrupted a long series of hospitalizations for acute HF. Based on our experience, we conclude that treatment with ARNI allows better treatment optimization with a positive impact on the control of HF and related comorbidities.

Sacubitril/valsartan can improve exercise performance in systolic chronic heart failure patients: a case report

OBJECTIVE

The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) provides functional prognostic parameters for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), such as peak volume of oxygen (VO₂) and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO₂) slope. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has been recently approved for CHF patients as it reduces cardiovascular (CV) deaths and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). However, the potential beneficial effects of this therapy on exercise performance have been poorly investigated to date.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 64 year old woman with systolic HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III, ejection fraction 35%) due to moderate/severe aortic and tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension. The patient had several co-morbidities and a history of CV surgery (mitral valve replacement due to bacterial endocarditis). In November 2016, a CPET was performed in stable clinical conditions, showing severe cardiogenic limitation with signs of pulmonary hypertension (peak VO₂ 46% of predicted, VE/VCO₂ slope 36.5). According to current guidelines, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was replaced with sacubitril/valsartan (24/26 mg for 2 weeks and then increased to 49/51 mg) without any other change in medical therapy. At 2 months, CPET showed improvement in exercise performance (peak VO₂ 61%, VE/VCO₂ slope 26.9). Echocardiographic parameters also showed mild improvement, whereas renal function remained unchanged. Thus, the dose of sacubitril/valsartan was increased to 97/103 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a case of a systolic HF patient successfully treated with sacubitril/valsartan who showed a rapid improvement of exercise performance at CPET.

Sacubitril/valsartan improves both functional and echocardiographic parameters in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the clinical efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in a group of ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) referred to our HF clinic.

METHODS

Patients (n = 29; 72% males; mean age 76 years) with HFrEF in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-III were included in the present study. We evaluated clinical as well as echocardiographic parameters (e.g. haemodynamics, such as blood pressure and heart rate, metabolic status, echocardiographic ventricular volumes and ejection fraction [EF]), at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan.

RESULTS

After 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment, several parameters were significantly improved. For example, EF and ventricular volumes (both diastolic and systolic) and atrial dimensions, as well as NYHA functional class (only 1 patient was still in NYHA class III) and renal impairment improved. There was no hospitalization for HF or other causes during the 6 month follow-up and no patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our real-life experience, in HFrEF patients with NYHA class II-III, the new angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) sacubitril/valsartan was effective in improving HF management, both from the clinical and the echocardiographic perspective.

Pharmacological Management of a Heart Failure Patient with Severe Obesity

Obesity is one of the commonest comorbidities in patients with heart failure, and it is associated with increased mortality risk. However, obese patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials and therefore evidence on their management remains scant. In order to expand knowledge on the management of these patients, anecdotal reports may be considered. In the present case report, we discuss the successful management of an obese patient who received sacubitril/valsartan therapy. This treatment was initiated after a 12-month period of losartan therapy, which did not provide any benefit in terms of heart function. Importantly, during this period the patient required frequent hospitalizations, with a marked decrease in quality of life. After the switch to sacubitril/valsartan, a 10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed (from 30 to 40%) over a 12-month period. Moreover, no hospitalizations were required, and the patient was able to carry on at least some of his daily activities.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in “Field Practice” Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: A Monocentric Italian Experience

Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) experience a continuous decline in quality of life and have a very poor prognosis. Moreover, due to numerous comorbidities present in these patients, transplantation and left ventricular assist devices are usually impracticable in clinical practice. In this challenging setting, administration of inotropic agents may be the only possible therapy; however, this treatment requires frequent hospitalizations. Our hypothesis is that sacubitril/valsartan, given its marked efficacy and manageability, can be safely used in clinical practice in this setting, potentially reducing hospitalizations and the need for inotropic support. We report here our experience in a small series of patients with advanced HF treated with sacubitril/valsartan.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Elderly Patient with Heart Failure: A Case Report

Sacubitril/valsartan has recently been approved for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Given its recent introduction in the armamentarium for the treatment of heart failure (HF), "field-practice" evidence is required to deepen the clinical management of sacubitril/valsartan therapy. We report a relevant case of an elderly patient who achieved major clinical benefits after only 3 months of sacubitril/valsartan therapy. Importantly, in our assessment, we employed speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), a recent echocardiography technique that is non-Doppler and not angle dependent, which analyzes deformations of heart chambers from standard images and allows a fast, reliable, and reproducible assessment of heart function. After 3 months of therapy, NHYA class decreased from III to I-II and hypertension was controlled. Echocardiography examination also showed a marked improvement, with a reduction of left ventricular diameter, improved diastolic function (E = 0.39 m/s; A 0.69 m/s; E/A 0.55), normalized diastolic function index (E/E' TDI = 6.93), normalized atrial volume (63 mL), and improved atrial strain (15.44%). This case report documents the fast clinical and symptom improvement with sacubitril/valsartan in an elderly patient with HF; comprehensive echocardiographic assessment, including STE, also revealed a marked functional improvement with this compound.

Sacubitril/Valsartan: Effect on Walking Test and Physical Capability

The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is a simple and inexpensive exercise test to evaluate physical functional capacity that is widely used in heart failure (HF) patients. With the 6MWT, a distance <350 m is associated with increased mortality in patients with HF, and change in walking distance >50 m is considered clinically relevant. To our knowledge, information on improvement in physical functional capacity with sacubitril/valsartan, as assessed by the 6MWT, is still scant. In our daily practice, we apply this test to all patients whenever possible; therefore, we report here the findings observed in a small series of 5 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction after a 1-month treatment with sacubitril/valsartan at full dose. The mean distance walked on the 6MWT at baseline was 129 m (±64 SD), and this value increased to 436 m (±156) after 1 month of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. The mean difference from baseline was 305 m (±110). According to these preliminary findings, in clinical practice, a 1-month therapy of sacubitril/valsartan optimized at a 97/103-mg b.i.d. dose appears to be associated with a relevant improvement in the 6MWT.

Is Entresto good for the brain?

The main stay pharmacotherapy for heart failure (HF) is targeted towards rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) and neprilysin pathways (NP). Both therapeutic strategies decreases morbidity and mortality but also carry considerable adverse effects. This review of the literature highlights the new generation of HF drug, sacubitril-valsartan (SV), trade name Entresto (researched as LCZ696, Novartis) which simultaneously blocks RAAS and NP. This dual action of angiotensin receptors blocker and neprilysin inhibitor (NPi) has improved HF prognosis and it is an evolution in the management of HF. Although the initial follow-up of patients treated with SV has yielded promising results, there are concerns regarding potential side effects especially an increase in the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and young onset of AD. NPi interferes with the breakdown and clearing of beta-amyloid peptides, the plaques seen in AD, raising concern for AD in SV patients. On the other hand, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases are established risk factors for AD which can be decreased by SV therapy. It is therefore essential that SV treated patients are followed up over an extended period of time to detect any adverse cognitive changes.

Resetting the neurohormonal balance in heart failure (HF): the relevance of the natriuretic peptide (NP) system to the clinical management of patients with HF

The natriuretic peptide (NP) system, which includes atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and C-type natriuretic peptide, has an important role in cardiovascular homeostasis, promoting a number of physiological effects including diuresis, vasodilation, and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Heart failure (HF) is associated with defects in NP processing and synthesis, and there is a strong relationship between NP levels and disease state. NPs are useful biomarkers in HF, and their use in diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis is well established, particularly in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There has also been interest in their use to guide disease management and therapeutic decision making. An understanding of NPs in HF has also resulted in interest in synthetic NPs for the treatment of HF and in treatments that target neprilysin, a protease that degrades NPs. A novel drug, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), which simultaneously inhibits neprilysin and blocks the angiotensin II type I receptor, was shown to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with HFrEF and has been approved for use in such patients in Europe and the USA. In light of the development of treatments that target neprilysin and of recent data in relation to synthetic NPs, it is timely to review the current understanding of the role of NPs in HF and their use in diagnosis, evaluating prognosis and guiding treatment, as well as their place in HF therapy.

Silent disease progression in clinically stable heart failure

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a progressive disorder whereby cardiac structure and function continue to deteriorate, often despite the absence of clinically apparent signs and symptoms of a worsening disease state. This silent yet progressive nature of HFrEF can contribute to the increased risk of death-even in patients who are 'clinically stable', or who are asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic-because it often goes undetected and/or undertreated. Current therapies are aimed at improving clinical symptoms, and several agents more directly target the underlying causes of disease; however, new therapies are needed that can more fully address factors responsible for underlying progressive cardiac dysfunction. In this review, mechanisms that drive HFrEF, including ongoing cardiomyocyte loss, mitochondrial abnormalities, impaired calcium cycling, elevated LV wall stress, reactive interstitial fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, are discussed. Additionally, limitations of current HF therapies are reviewed, with a focus on how these therapies are designed to counteract the deleterious effects of compensatory neurohumoral activation but do not fully prevent disease progression. Finally, new investigational therapies that may improve the underlying molecular, cellular, and structural abnormalities associated with HF progression are reviewed.

Current and emerging pharmacologic options for the management of patients with chronic and acute decompensated heart failure

INTRODUCTION

For many years heart failure (HF) was known as a fatal disease with an ominous prognosis. In the last decades better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying HF has resulted in major breakthrough in the management and improvement in the natural history of this clinical syndrome. Areas covered: The review is focused on current and upcoming pharmacological therapies in patients with chronic and acute HF, starting with brief overview of drugs which improve the outcomes in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) including neurohormonal antagonists, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and If- channel inhibitor, then presenting the summary of symptomatic treatment, the pharmacotherapy in chronic HF with preserved and mid-range EF and in acute HF. Finally, we report the emerging pharmacologic options and ongoing clinical trials and future directions in pharmacotherapy. Expert commentary: The guidelines-recommended therapies in HF with reduced EF need to be widely implemented into the everyday clinical practice. Better clinical characterization of HF with preserved, mid-range EF and acute HF, with better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may ultimately result in a development of effective strategies improving ominous outcomes in these patients.

Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure: mechanisms and substrates beyond modulating natriuretic peptides

The autonomic nervous system, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and the natriuretic peptide system represent critical regulatory pathways in heart failure and as such have been the major targets of pharmacological development. The introduction and approval of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) have broadened the available drug treatments of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Neprilysin catalyses the degradation of a number of vasodilator peptides, including the natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, substance P, and adrenomedullin, as well as vasoconstrictor peptides, including endothelin-1 and angiotensin I and II. We review the multiple, potentially competing, substrates for neprilysin inhibition, and the resultant composite clinical effects of ARNi therapy. A mechanistic understanding of this novel therapeutic class may provide important insights into the expected on-target and off-target effects when this agent is more widely prescribed.

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) on Natriuresis, Diuresis, Blood Pressures, and NT-proBNP in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension

Salt-sensitive hypertension (SSH) is characterized by impaired sodium excretion and subnormal vasodilatory response to salt loading. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) was hypothesized to increase natriuresis and diuresis and result in superior blood pressure control compared with valsartan in Asian patients with SSH. In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 72 patients with SSH received sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg and valsartan 320 mg once daily for 4 weeks each. SSH was diagnosed if the mean arterial pressure increased by ≥10% when patients switched from low (50 mmol/d) to high (320 mmol/d) sodium diet. The primary outcome was cumulative 6- and 24-hour sodium excretion after first dose administration. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a significant increase in natriuresis (adjusted treatment difference: 24.5 mmol/6 hours, 50.3 mmol/24 hours, both P <0.001) and diuresis (adjusted treatment difference: 291.2 mL/6 hours, P <0.001; 356.4 mL/24 hours, P =0.002) on day 1, but not on day 28, and greater reductions in office and ambulatory blood pressure on day 28. Despite morning dosing of both drugs, ambulatory blood pressure reductions were more pronounced at nighttime than at daytime or the 24-hour average. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels on day 28 (adjusted treatment difference: −20%; P =0.001). Sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan were safe and well tolerated with no significant changes in body weight or serum sodium and potassium levels with either treatments. In conclusion, sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan was associated with short-term increases in natriuresis and diuresis, superior office and ambulatory blood pressure control, and significantly reduced N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels in Asian patients with SSH.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01681576.

Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction-Recent Developments

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents at least half of the cases of heart failure, which is a syndrome defined as the inability of the heart to supply the body's tissues with an adequate amount of blood under conditions of normal cardiac filling pressure. HFrEF is responsible for high costs and rates of mortality, morbidity, and hospital admissions, mainly in developed countries. Thus, the need for better diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches and consequently better outcomes is clear. In this article, we review the principal aspects of pathophysiology and diagnosis of HFrEF, with focus on emerging biomarkers and on recent echocardiographic methods for the assessment of left ventricular function. Furthermore, we discuss several major developments in pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment of HFrEF in the last years, including cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and the recent and promising drug LCZ696, focusing on current indications, unanswered questions, and other relevant aspects.

C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Improves Left Ventricular Functional Performance at Rest and Restores Normal Exercise Responses after Heart Failure

In heart failure (HF), the impaired left ventricular (LV) arterial coupling and diastolic dysfunction present at rest are exacerbated during exercise. C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is elevated in HF; however, its functional effects are unclear. We tested the hypotheses that CNP with vasodilating, natriuretic, and positive inotropic and lusitropic actions may prevent this abnormal exercise response after HF. We determined the effects of CNP (2 μg/kg plus 0.4 μg/kg per minute, i.v., 20 minutes) on plasma levels of cGMP before and after HF and assessed LV dynamics during exercise in 10 chronically instrumented dogs with pacing-induced HF. Compared with the levels before HF, CNP infusion caused significantly greater increases in cGMP levels after HF. After HF, at rest, CNP administration significantly reduced LV end-systolic pressure (PES), arterial elastance (EA), and end-diastolic pressure. The peak mitral flow (dV/dtmax) was also increased owing to decreased minimum LVP (LVPmin) and the time constant of LV relaxation (τ) (P < 0.05). In addition, LV contractility (EES) was increased. The LV-arterial coupling (EES/EA) was improved. The beneficial effects persisted during exercise. Compared with exercise in HF preparation, treatment with CNP caused significantly less important increases in PES but significantly decreased τ (34.2 vs. 42.6 ms) and minimum left ventricular pressure with further augmented dV/dtmax Both EES, EES/EA (0.87 vs. 0.32) were increased. LV mechanical efficiency improved from 0.38 to 0.57 (P < 0.05). After HF, exogenous CNP produces arterial vasodilatation and augments LV contraction, relaxation, diastolic filling, and LV arterial coupling, thus improving LV performance at rest and restoring normal exercise responses after HF.

The effect of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) on amyloid-β concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid in healthy subjects

AIMS

LCZ696 (angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor) is a novel drug developed for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Neprilysin is one of multiple enzymes degrading amyloid-β (Aβ). Its inhibition may increase Aβ levels. The potential exists that treatment of LCZ696, through the inhibition of neprilysin by LBQ657 (an LCZ696 metabolite), may result in accumulation of Aβ. The aim of this study was to assess the blood-brain-barrier penetration of LBQ657 and the potential effects of LCZ696 on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of Aβ isoforms in healthy human volunteers.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study, healthy subjects received once daily LCZ696 (400 mg, n = 21) or placebo (n = 22) for 14 days.

RESULTS

LCZ696 had no significant effect on CSF AUEC(0,36 h) of the aggregable Aβ species 1-42 or 1-40 compared with placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0.98 [95% CI 0.73, 1.34; P = 0.919] and 1.05 [95% CI 0.82, 1.34; P = 0.702], respectively). A 42% increase in CSF AUEC(0,36 h) of soluble Aβ 1-38 was observed (estimated treatment ratio 1.42 [95% CI 1.05, 1.91; P = 0.023]). CSF levels of LBQ657 and CSF Aβ 1-42, 1-40, and 1-38 concentrations were not related (r(2) values 0.022, 0.010, and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LCZ696 did not cause changes in CSF levels of aggregable Aβ isoforms (1-42 and 1-40) compared with placebo, despite achieving CSF concentrations of LBQ657 sufficient to inhibit neprilysin. The clinical relevance of the increase in soluble CSF Aβ 1-38 is currently unknown.