Radioligand binding to intact cells as a tool for extended drug screening in a representative physiological context

Comparative Saturation Binding Analysis of 64Cu-Labeled Somatostatin Analogues Using Cell Homogenates and Intact Cells

The development of novel ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically entails the characterization of their binding affinity, which is often performed with radioligands in a competition or saturation binding assay format. Since GPCRs are transmembrane proteins, receptor samples for binding assays are prepared from tissue sections, cell membranes, cell homogenates, or intact cells. As part of our investigations on modulating the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled peptides for improved theranostic targeting of neuroendocrine tumors with a high abundance of the somatostatin receptor sub-type 2 (SST₂), we characterized a series of ⁶⁴Cu-labeled [Tyr³]octreotate (TATE) derivatives in vitro in saturation binding assays. Herein, we report on the SST₂ binding parameters measured toward intact mouse pheochromocytoma cells and corresponding cell homogenates and discuss the observed differences taking the physiology of SST₂ and GPCRs in general into account. Furthermore, we point out method-specific advantages and limitations.

Distinct In Vitro Binding Profile of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Antagonist [177Lu]Lu-OPS201 Compared to the Agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumours with the radiolabelled somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST₂) peptide agonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is effective and well-established. Recent studies suggest improved therapeutic efficacy using the SST₂ peptide antagonist [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms that lead to the observed differences. In the present in vitro study, we compared kinetic binding, saturation binding, competition binding, cellular uptake and release of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 versus [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE using HEK cells stably transfected with the human SST₂. While [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE exhibited comparable affinity (K_D, 0.15 ± 0.003 and 0.08 ± 0.02 nM, respectively), [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 recognized four times more binding sites than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Competition assays demonstrated that a high concentration of the agonist displaced only 30% of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 bound to HEK-SST₂ cell membranes; an indication that the antagonist binds to additional sites that are not recognized by the agonist. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 showed faster association and slower dissociation than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Whereas most of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 remained at the cell surface, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was almost completely internalised inside the cell. The present data identified distinct differences between [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE regarding the recognition of receptor binding sites (higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) and their kinetics (faster association and slower dissociation of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201) that explain, to a great extent, the improved therapeutic efficacy of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-OPS201 compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

The right tools for the job: the central role for next generation chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution methods in phenotypic drug discovery

The reconnection of the scientific community with phenotypic drug discovery has created exciting new possibilities to develop therapies for diseases with highly complex biology. It promises to revolutionise fields such as neurodegenerative disease and regenerative medicine, where the development of new drugs has consistently proved elusive. Arguably, the greatest challenge in readopting the phenotypic drug discovery approach exists in establishing a crucial chain of translatability between phenotype and benefit to patients in the clinic. This remains a key stumbling block for the field which needs to be overcome in order to fully realise the potential of phenotypic drug discovery. Excellent quality chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution techniques will be a crucial part of this process. In this review, we discuss the current capabilities of chemical probes and chemistry-based target deconvolution methods and evaluate the next advances necessary in order to fully support phenotypic screening approaches in drug discovery.

Site-specific effects of neurosteroids on GABAA receptor activation and desensitization

This study examines how site-specific binding to three identified neurosteroid-binding sites in the α₁β₃ GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) contributes to neurosteroid allosteric modulation. We found that the potentiating neurosteroid, allopregnanolone, but not its inhibitory 3β-epimer epi-allopregnanolone, binds to the canonical β₃(+)–α₁(-) intersubunit site that mediates receptor activation by neurosteroids. In contrast, both allopregnanolone and epi-allopregnanolone bind to intrasubunit sites in the β₃ subunit, promoting receptor desensitization and the α₁ subunit promoting effects that vary between neurosteroids. Two neurosteroid analogues with diazirine moieties replacing the 3-hydroxyl (KK148 and KK150) bind to all three sites, but do not potentiate GABA_AR currents. KK148 is a desensitizing agent, whereas KK150 is devoid of allosteric activity. These compounds provide potential chemical scaffolds for neurosteroid antagonists. Collectively, these data show that differential occupancy and efficacy at three discrete neurosteroid-binding sites determine whether a neurosteroid has potentiating, inhibitory, or competitive antagonist activity on GABA_ARs.

Sensitive and specific detection of tumour cells based on a multivalent DNA nanocreeper and a multiplexed fluorescence supersandwich

A self-assembled DNA nanostructure based on a DNA nanocreeper and multiplexed fluorescence supersandwich was designed for the sensitive and specific detection of tumour cells. This nanostructure could improve the binding affinity of current aptamers and trigger signal amplification, which provide potential for the discrimination of low abundant target cells in liquid biopsy.

Binding kinetics of ligands acting at GPCRs

The influence of drug-receptor binding kinetics has often been overlooked during the development of new therapeutics that target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Over the last decade there has been a growing understanding that an in-depth knowledge of binding kinetics at GPCRs is required to successfully target this class of proteins. Ligand binding to a GPCR is often not a simple single step process with ligand freely diffusing in solution. This review will discuss the experiments and equations that are commonly used to measure binding kinetics and how factors such as allosteric regulation, rebinding and ligand interaction with the plasma membrane may influence these measurements. We will then consider the molecular characteristics of a ligand and if these can be linked to association and dissociation rates.

Homogeneous, Real-Time NanoBRET Binding Assays for the Histamine H3 and H4 Receptors on Living Cells

Receptor-binding affinity and ligand-receptor residence time are key parameters for the selection of drug candidates and are routinely determined using radioligand competition-binding assays. Recently, a novel bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) method utilizing a NanoLuc-fused receptor was introduced to detect fluorescent ligand binding. Moreover, this NanoBRET method gives the opportunity to follow fluorescent ligand binding on intact cells in real time, and therefore, results might better reflect in vivo conditions as compared with the routinely used cell homogenates or purified membrane fractions. In this study, a real-time NanoBRET-based binding assay was established and validated to detect binding of unlabeled ligands to the histamine H₃ receptor (H₃R) and histamine H₄ receptor on intact cells. Obtained residence times of clinically tested H₃R antagonists were reflected by their duration of H₃R antagonism in a functional receptor recovery assay.

Pharmacological screening technologies for venom peptide discovery

Venomous animals occupy one of the most successful evolutionary niches and occur on nearly every continent. They deliver venoms via biting and stinging apparatuses with the aim to rapidly incapacitate prey and deter predators. This has led to the evolution of venom components that act at a number of biological targets - including ion channels, G-protein coupled receptors, transporters and enzymes - with exquisite selectivity and potency, making venom-derived components attractive pharmacological tool compounds and drug leads. In recent years, plate-based pharmacological screening approaches have been introduced to accelerate venom-derived drug discovery. A range of assays are amenable to this purpose, including high-throughput electrophysiology, fluorescence-based functional and binding assays. However, despite these technological advances, the traditional activity-guided fractionation approach is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The combination of screening techniques suitable for miniaturization with sequence-based discovery approaches - supported by advanced proteomics, mass spectrometry, chromatography as well as synthesis and expression techniques - promises to further improve venom peptide discovery. Here, we discuss practical aspects of establishing a pipeline for venom peptide drug discovery with a particular emphasis on pharmacology and pharmacological screening approaches. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Venom-derived Peptides as Pharmacological Tools.'

Cell membranes… and how long drugs may exert beneficial pharmacological activity in vivo

The time course of the beneficial pharmacological effect of a drug has long been considered to depend merely on the temporal fluctuation of its free concentration. Only in the last decade has it become widely accepted that target-binding kinetics can also affect in vivo pharmacological activity. Although current reviews still essentially focus on genuine dissociation rates, evidence is accumulating that additional micro-pharmacokinetic (PK) and -pharmacodynamic (PD) mechanisms, in which the cell membrane plays a central role, may also increase the residence time of a drug on its target. The present review provides a compilation of otherwise widely dispersed information on this topic. The cell membrane can intervene in drug binding via the following three major mechanisms: (i) by acting as a sink/repository for the drug; (ii) by modulating the conformation of the drug and even by participating in the binding process; and (iii) by facilitating the approach (and rebinding) of the drug to the target. To highlight these mechanisms, we focus on drugs that are currently used in clinical therapy, such as the antihypertensive angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan, the atypical antipsychotic agent clozapine and the bronchodilator salmeterol. Although the role of cell membranes in PK-PD modelling is gaining increasing interest, many issues remain unresolved. It is likely that novel biophysical and computational approaches will provide improved insights in the near future.