1
|
Zhou X, Li Y, Zhu T, Xu Y. Individuals with long-term illness, disability or infirmity are more likely to smoke than healthy controls: An instrumental variable analysis. Front Public Health 2023; 10:1015607. [PMID: 36726634 PMCID: PMC9885293 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1015607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the prevalence of smoking cessation programs and public health campaigns, individuals with long-term illness, disability, or infirmity have been found to smoke more often than those without such conditions, leading to worsening health. However, the available literature has mainly focused on the association between long-term illness and smoking, which might suffer from the possible bidirectional influence, while few studies have examined the potential causal effect of long-term illness on smoking. This gap in knowledge can be addressed using an instrumental variable analysis that uses a third variable as an instrument between the endogenous independent and dependent variables and allows the identification of the direction of causality under the discussed assumptions. Our study analyzes the UK General Household Survey in 2006, covering a nationally representative 13,585 households. We exploited the number of vehicles as the instrumental variable for long-term illness, disability, or infirmity as vehicle numbers may be related to illness based on the notion that these individuals are less likely to drive, but that vehicle number may have no relationship to the likelihood of smoking. Our results suggested that chronic illness status causes a significantly 28% higher probability of smoking. The findings have wide implications for public health policymakers to design a more accessible campaign around smoking and for psychologists and doctors to take targeted care for the welfare of individuals with long-term illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingzuo Zhou
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Xingzuo Zhou ✉
| | - Yiang Li
- Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Tianning Zhu
- Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yiran Xu
- Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang HNR, Lee KS, Koh J, Park Y, Shin H. The Factors Associated with Attempted Smoking Cessation and Successful Four-Week Smoking Abstinence According to the Types of Disability in Seoul, Korea. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:3548. [PMID: 33805507 PMCID: PMC8036357 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated smoking behaviors by disability type among people with disabilities in Korea and identified factors associated with attempted smoking cessation and successful four-week smoking abstinence. Data were collected between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Predictors of attempted smoking cessation and successful four-week smoking abstinence were analyzed by disability type in 557 participants. Compared to people with mental health disorders, people with physical disabilities or brain lesions were more likely to attempt smoking cessation, and people with physical or internal disabilities were more likely to successfully abstain for four weeks. Common predictors of smoking cessation attempts and four-week abstinence were education level and CO level. Employment status predicted attempted cessation, while confidence in smoking cessation predicted four-week abstinence. To provide effective smoking cessation services for people with disabilities, disability type should be considered, and comprehensive and sustainable community-based programs need to be developed. Furthermore, a standardized survey of people with disabilities should be conducted to examine socioeconomic factors, including health status, employment, and education level, and to explore fundamental measures needed to address the problem of smoking among people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Nu-Ri Kang
- Seoul Tobacco Control Center, Seoul 06591, Korea; (H.-N.-R.K.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (H.S.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - Kang-Sook Lee
- Seoul Tobacco Control Center, Seoul 06591, Korea; (H.-N.-R.K.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (H.S.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - JuYeon Koh
- Seoul Tobacco Control Center, Seoul 06591, Korea; (H.-N.-R.K.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (H.S.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - YuJin Park
- Seoul Tobacco Control Center, Seoul 06591, Korea; (H.-N.-R.K.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (H.S.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - HyunKyung Shin
- Seoul Tobacco Control Center, Seoul 06591, Korea; (H.-N.-R.K.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (H.S.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casseus M, West B, Graber JM, Wackowski O, Cooney JM, Lee HS. Disparities in illicit drug use and disability status among a nationally representative sample of U.S. college students. Disabil Health J 2020; 14:100949. [PMID: 32620532 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of students with disabilities attending postsecondary institutions is increasing. However, research on substance use among this population is limited. OBJECTIVE This study examined disparities in the prevalence of illicit drug use and drug use disorders among college students with disabilities and their counterparts without disabilities. METHODS Data from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health were analyzed. We estimated prevalence and odds of disability, illicit drug use, and illicit drug dependence or abuse in a subsample of college students (n = 6,189). RESULTS A majority of college students reporting a disability had a cognitive limitation. Students with any disability had a higher prevalence of illicit drug use and significantly higher odds of ever use of illicit drugs (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.20-1.79). Compared to their peers with no disabilities, they were more likely to have misused any psychotherapeutic in the past year (AOR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.08-1.76), and had nearly twice the odds of misusing prescription pain relievers in the past month (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.11-3.49). Additionally, students with disabilities had three times the odds of meeting criteria for past-year dependence or abuse of any illicit drug (AOR = 3.01; 95% CI 2.06-4.40). CONCLUSION This study documented a higher prevalence of drug use and drug use disorders among college students with disabilities compared to their nondisabled peers. Understanding the risk factors for substance use in this population is critical for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Casseus
- Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
| | - Bernadette West
- Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Judith M Graber
- Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Olivia Wackowski
- Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - James M Cooney
- Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations, 50 Labor Center Way, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Heather S Lee
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Emerson E. Smoking among adults with and without disabilities in the UK. J Public Health (Oxf) 2019; 40:e502-e509. [PMID: 29617853 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The health risks of cigarette smoking are well established. As a result, reducing cigarette smoking is a key concern for public health agencies. Little is known about rates of smoking among adults with disabilities. Methods Secondary analysis of data collected in Waves 2 and 7 of 'Understanding Society', an annual household panel study. Results Age and gender adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of adults with disabilities smoking increased significantly from 1.41 (1.33-1.49) in 2010-12 to 1.57 (1.45-1.70) in 2015-17 (P = 0.032). AORs of adults with disabilities smoking 20 or more cigarettes a day increased non-significantly from 1.83 (1.66-2.02) in 2010-12 to 1.90 (1.65-2.20) in 2015-17. These changes were evident for both men and women and across age groups. Additionally adjusting these estimates to take account of between group differences in socioeconomic position significantly reduced the AORs for both smoking outcomes. Changes over time in AORs reflected a more rapid decline in smoking among participants without a disability. Conclusions Adults with disabilities are more likely than their peers to smoke. Public health agencies and practitioners may wish to consider what reasonable adjustments may need to be made to policies and interventions to ensure that they are effective for adults with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Emerson
- Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Background: People with disabilities (PWD) often self-report reduced access to preventive health services and poorer health than people without disability. Risk factors for chronic disease are more prevalent in PWD, increasing risk for secondary conditions including cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Logistic regression was used to analyze data from the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey to explore the relationship between disability with mobility impairment and CVD. Results: Difficulty walking and climbing stairs significantly predicted concomitant CVD and diabetes in logistic regression models. Conclusion: Information from this study may be useful in addressing CVD risk for adults with mobility impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary L. Wilby
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences, La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
MacLeod MA, Tremblay PF, Graham K, Bernards S, Rehm J, Wells S. Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2016; 25:243-254. [PMID: 27634553 PMCID: PMC6860311 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a brief measurement tool used cross-culturally to capture the multi-dimensional nature of disablement through six domains, including: understanding and interacting with the world; moving and getting around; self-care; getting on with people; life activities; and participation in society. Previous psychometric research supports that the WHODAS 2.0 functions as a general factor of disablement. In a pooled dataset from community samples of adults (N = 447) we used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm a one-factor structure. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals based on their patterns of responses. We identified four distinct classes, or patterns of disablement: (1) pervasive disability; (2) physical disability; (3) emotional, cognitive, or interpersonal disability; (4) no/low disability. Convergent validity of the latent class subgroups was found with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, number of days affected by disabilities, stress, mental health, and substance use. These classes offer a simple and meaningful way to classify people with disabilities based on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Focusing on individuals with a high probability of being in the first three classes may help guide interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A. MacLeod
- Institute for Mental Health Policy ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonOntarioCanada
- Region of Waterloo Public Health and Emergency ServicesWaterlooOntarioCanada
| | | | - Kathryn Graham
- Institute for Mental Health Policy ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonOntarioCanada
- Department of PsychologyWestern UniversityLondonOntarioCanada
- Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- National Drug Research InstituteCurtin UniversityPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of HealthDeakin UniversityVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sharon Bernards
- Institute for Mental Health Policy ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonOntarioCanada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Mental Health Policy ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoOntarioCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health & AddictionTorontoOntarioCanada
- Epidemiological Research UnitTechnische Universitat Dresden, Klinische Psychologie & PsychotherapieDresdenGermany
- Graduate Department of Community Health and Institute of Medical ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Samantha Wells
- Institute for Mental Health Policy ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthLondonOntarioCanada
- Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- School of Psychology, Faculty of HealthDeakin UniversityVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsWestern UniversityLondonOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagarajan VD, Okoli CTC. A systematic review of tobacco use among adolescents with physical disabilities. Public Health 2016; 133:107-15. [PMID: 26877065 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a systematic review of tobacco use among adolescents with physical disabilities. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review. METHODS A search was performed of English articles published prior to December 2014 in the PubMed database for studies examining smoking rates among adolescents with and without physical disabilities. Ten studies were retrieved (all cross-sectional surveys) of which six compared adolescent populations from nationally representative samples and four examined those based on convenience sampling. Pooled analyses of smoking rates by disability status were performed. RESULTS In studies from nationally representative samples (n = 6 studies), adolescents with physical disabilities were significantly more likely to use tobacco as compared to adolescents without (pooled analyses = 29.7% vs 23.3%). However, in studies from non-representative samples, adolescents with physical disabilities were less likely to use tobacco as compared to adolescents without (pooled analyses = 22.7% vs 39.1%). CONCLUSIONS Adolescents with physical disabilities may have an increased risk of tobacco use relative to those without disabilities. Tailored tobacco use prevention and cessation strategies may be appropriate for this high-risk population. Future longitudinal studies which determine factors associated with tobacco use among adolescents with different disabilities should be considered to reduce the disproportionate tobacco use in this population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee JE, Park JH, Kim HR, Shin HI. Smoking behaviors among people with disabilities in Korea. Disabil Health J 2014; 7:236-41. [PMID: 24680053 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2013] [Revised: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 11/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most reports concerning smoking behaviors in people with disabilities have been from Western societies; knowledge of smoking behaviors in Asian countries, including Korea, is insufficient. OBJECTIVES This study investigates the smoking behaviors of people with a disability compared to the general population in Korea. METHODS We compared the smoking behaviors of people with a disability with the general population by using datasets from the 2011 National Survey of Disabled People and an age- and sex-matched random sample from the 5th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Random samples of people 18 years of age and older with disabilities (n = 5636) and of the general population were used (n = 5636). The main outcome measures include smoking behaviors by type, severity, and age at disability onset. RESULTS People with a mental or physical impairment have higher current smoking rates (38.1% and 26.3%, respectively) than the general population (23.3%). In particular, current smokers with psychiatric impairment were more likely to smoke more than 20 cigarettes a day (61.2%). People with a disability, regardless of severity or age at onset, were less likely than the general population to have attempted to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS Smoking behaviors differed according to the type of disability. These results suggest that interventions for smoking prevention and cessation need to be tailored according to disability characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Eun Lee
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Hyock Park
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeounggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Ri Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung-Ik Shin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|