1
|
Bang G, Park M, Seon JY, Park SY. Comparative analysis of genetic testing utilization rates among people with and without disabilities in South Korea from 2016 to 2019, focusing on malignant neoplasms: A national population-based study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7102. [PMID: 38711356 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncogene testing is widely used to detect or direct cancer treatments. Compared to people without disabilities, people with disabilities in Korea have a lower cancer incidence rate but a fivefold higher cancer mortality rate, implying delayed detection. METHODS We used an administrative database combining disability status and care utilization to analyze every case of cancer-related genetic testing paid for by the National Health Insurance Services of Korea between 2016 and 2019. We first compared percentages of individuals who had taken a registered genetic test by their disability statuses. We then compared the most frequently utilized tests between individuals with and without disabilities. RESULTS Korean citizens, 175,000 in total, underwent at least one of the 192 registered cancer-related genetic tests between 2016 and 2019. People with disabilities utilized these genetic tests at higher rates than those without disabilities, regardless of sex or age. Among people aged ≥40 years, lung and colorectal cancer-related tests were most frequently utilized, regardless of disability status. CONCLUSION Although the cancer-related genetic test uptake rate is higher among people with disabilities than among those without disabilities, it is still possible that information on these tests is not as readily available to people with disabilities. Therefore, it is imperative for the government to actively devise strategies to enhance national cancer screening rates among people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwanwook Bang
- Department of Medical Education and Humanities, College of Medicine, Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea
- Disability Health Research Center of Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Minji Park
- Kyunghee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Yeon Seon
- Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, South Korea
| | - So-Youn Park
- Department of Medical Education and Humanities, College of Medicine, Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea
- Disability Health Research Center of Kyunghee University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marinucci N, Moy N, Koloski N, Shah A, Austin G, Russell-Bennett R, McGraw J, Dulleck U, Holtmann G. Social determinants and participation in fecal occult blood test based colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Health Promot J Austr 2024; 35:9-36. [PMID: 37039425 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) has saved thousands of lives globally with multiple countries adopting comprehensive population wide screening programs. Participation rates in FOBT based CRC screening for the socially and economically disadvantaged remains low. The aim of this systematic review is to explore empirical evidence that will guide targeted interventions to improve participation rates within priority populations. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cinahl and PsycInfo were systematically searched from inception to 22 June 2022. Eligible studies contained qualitative evidence identifying barriers to FOBT based CRC screening for populations impacted by the social determinants of health. An inductive thematic synthesis approach was applied using grounded theory methodology, to explore descriptive themes and interpret these into higher order analytical constructs and theories. RESULTS A total of 8,501 publications were identified and screened. A total of 48 studies from 10 countries were eligible for inclusion, representing 2,232 subjects. Coding within included studies resulted in 30 key descriptive themes with a thematic frequency greater than 10%. Coded themes applied to four overarching, interconnected barriers driving inequality for priority populations: social, behavioural, economic and technical/interfaces. SO WHAT?: This study has highlighted the need for stronger patient/provider relationships to mitigate barriers to FOBT screening participation for diverse groups. Findings can assist health professionals and policy makers address the systemic exclusion of priority populations in cancer screening by moving beyond the responsibility of the individual to a focus on addressing the information asymmetry driving low value perceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Marinucci
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Naomi Moy
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Natasha Koloski
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ayesha Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Glenn Austin
- Queensland Health, Cancer Screening Unit, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebekah Russell-Bennett
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jacquie McGraw
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Uwe Dulleck
- Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology (BEST), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU and CESifo LMU, Munich, Australia
| | - Gerald Holtmann
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|