Glycohemoglobin screening in adolescents attending to the Department of Paediatrics at a tertiary hospital in Turkey

HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus

HbA1c has become the gold standard for monitoring glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. The use of this test has been expanded to diagnose and screen for diabetes mellitus with the endorsement of influential diabetes societies and the World Health Organization. The literature on the use of HbA1c for the diagnosis and screening of diabetes mellitus was critically examined. There is substantial recent literature on this topic with strong advocates for the use of HbA1c to diagnose and screen for diabetes and equally strong detractors for its use. Advocates of the use of HbA1c cite challenges in respect of patient compliance and the analysis of glucose and inconsistency of diagnosis with glucose-based diabetes diagnosis with the elimination or reduction in these challenges in HbA1c-based diagnosis. Detractors of its use cite increased cost, concerns about the availability of HbA1c testing, and the influence of demographic and clinical factors on HbA1c results that make the use of a single-threshold values questionable for different ethnic and age groups. Despite the recommendation of many international diabetes societies that HbA1c be used for screening and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, there is a wide divergence of opinion on this use.

Use of HbA(1C) testing to diagnose pre-diabetes in high risk African American children: a comparison with fasting glucose and HOMA-IR

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the discriminating power of HbA(1C) with other pre-diabetes diagnostic tests specifically in high-risk African American children.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was performed on a sample of 172 children (70 boys and 102 girls) aged 9-11 years with BMI's above the 85th percentile. Fasting glucose, insulin and HbA(1C) were analyzed from the plasma samples.

RESULTS

Of the 172 participants included in this analysis, 21 (12.2%) had HbA(1C) concentrations above the cutoff of 5.7 used to identify pre-diabetes. None (0%) of these 21 participants, however, were observed to have a glucose concentration above the pre-diabetes cutoff of 110 mg/dl, and only 13 of 21 participants had HOMA-IR above the pre-diabetes cutoff of 2.5. When compared to the previously identified glucose cutoff of 110 mg/dl and HOMA-IR cutoff of 2.5 for pre-diabetes, HbA(1C) showed high specificity (88 and 93%, respectively) but very low sensitivity (0 and 21%, respectively). Glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR were significantly interrelated, but HbA(1C) was not significantly correlated with these biochemical prediabetes assessment variables, nor with anthropometric (BMIz, WC) risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that HbA(1C) had poor discrimination power to identify prediabetes in overweight and obese 9- to 11-year-old African American children. Future studies are recommended to compare the feasibility, sensitivity and predictive power of different screening tests currently recommended to avoid inadequacy when screening for prediabetes and diabetes.