Potential for use of 1,5-anhydroglucitol when initiating insulin therapy in people with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal control with oral antidiabetic drugs

The progress of clinical research on the detection of 1,5-anhydroglucitol in diabetes and its complications

1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is sensitive to short-term glucose fluctuations and postprandial hyperglycemia, which has great potential in the clinical application of diabetes as a nontraditional blood glucose monitoring indicator. A large number of studies have found that 1,5-AG can be used to screen for diabetes, manage diabetes, and predict the perils of diabetes complications (diabetic nephropathy, diabetic cardiovascular disease, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic pregnancy complications, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, etc.). Additionally, 1,5-AG and β cells are also associated with each other. As a noninvasive blood glucose monitoring indicator, salivary 1,5-AG has much more benefit for clinical application; however, it cannot be ignored that its detection methods are not perfect. Thus, a considerable stack of research is still needed to establish an accurate and simple enzyme assay for the detection of salivary 1,5-AG. More clinical studies will also be required in the future to confirm the normal reference range of 1,5-AG and its role in diabetes complications to further enhance the blood glucose monitoring system for diabetes.

The effect of basal-bolus therapy varies with baseline 1,5-anhydroglucitol level in people with Type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis

AIMS

To investigate the impact of baseline 1,5-anhydroglucitol on the treatment effect of basal-bolus therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of onset 3, an 18-week, randomized, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in basal-bolus therapy (n = 116) vs. basal insulin-only therapy (n = 120) in people with Type 2 diabetes. The estimated treatment difference in change from baseline in HbA1c was investigated for different cut-off values of baseline 1,5-anhydroglucitol (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 μg/ml).

RESULTS

The estimated treatment difference in change from baseline in HbA1c between basal-bolus therapy and basal insulin-only therapy was statistically significantly greater in participants with baseline 1,5-anhydroglucitol ≤3 μg/ml (n = 34) vs. >3 μg/ml (n = 198) [estimated treatment difference (95% CI): -1.53% (-2.12; -0.94) vs. -0.82% (-1.07; -0.57); P-value for interaction = 0.03]. The estimated treatment difference became more pronounced when comparing participants with 1,5-anhydroglucitol ≤2 μg/ml (n = 15) vs. >2 μg/ml (n = 217) [estimated treatment difference (95% CI): -2.26% (-3.15; -1.36) vs. -0.85% (-1.08; -0.62); P-value for interaction = 0.003]. For cut-off values ≥4 μg/ml, estimated treatment differences were numerically greater below the cut-off compared with above, although the interaction terms were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that people with Type 2 diabetes with low 1,5-anhydroglucitol have an added treatment benefit with basal-bolus therapy compared with people with higher 1,5-anhydroglucitol. Further research is needed to clarify any clinical utility of these findings. Clinical Trials Registry No: NCT01850615.

1,5-Anhydroglucitol in diabetes mellitus

The measure of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration is the gold standard of glycemic control index in diabetes management and is well known as a marker for diabetes complications. However, HbA1c level neither accurately reflect glucose fluctuations, nor does it provide a clear indication of glycemic control in recent days or weeks. HbA1c concentration measurement can be confounded in patients with anemia, hemoglobinopathy, liver disease, or renal impairment. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) structurally resembles glucose. It can be influenced by diet or medication, gender and race, especially severe renal disease and various pathological conditions. Most notably, 1,5-AG level is reflective of short-term glucose status, postprandial hyperglycemia, and glycemic variability which are not captured by HbA1c assay. 1,5-AG may suggest an alternative index of subtypes of diabetes and a warning sign of diabetes complications. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of the role of 1,5-AG marker in diabetes. However, further investigations on the associations between this glycemic marker and diabetes complications are needed.