Indicators of socio-economic status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women in urban Tianjin, China

Socio-demographic and infrastructural variables influencing maternal risk concentration among ever-married women of reproductive age in rural West Bengal, India

BACKGROUND

The risk of a woman dying as a result of pregnancy or childbirth during her lifetime is about one in six in the poorest parts of the world.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to determine prevalence of maternal risk and the influencing variables among ever-married women belonging to the reproductive age group (15-49) of Birbhum district, West Bengal.

METHODS

A cohort-based retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out among the sample of 229 respondents through a purposive stratified random sampling method and a pre-designed semi-structured questionnaire. The ordinal logistic regression (OLR) model was taken as a tool of assessment. Before developing the proportional OLR model, we have checked the multicollinearity effect among the predictors and the first-order effect modifier was evaluated as well. We performed data analysis using SPSS version 26.

RESULTS

The result shows that illiterate women (Odds ratios [OR] = 2.81, 95% CI, 0.277-1.791), from lower standard of living (OR = 1.14, 95% CI, -0.845-1.116), married before the age of 15 years (OR = 21.96, 95% CI, -0.55-6.73) and between the age of 15-18 years (OR = 24.51. 95% CI, -0.45-6.85) are more likely to be affected by the higher concentration of maternal risk. Other important predictor is the time of pregnancy registration. Considering the transport and related en-route causalities, the result portraying a clear picture where the distance and travel time becoming significant factors in determining the concentration of maternal risk.

CONCLUSION

Incidences of child marriages should be restricted. Eradicating factors influencing an individual's decision to seek care would be an essential contribution in excluding the dominant maternal risk factors.

Trends in the prevalence of gestational diabetes in Catalonia from 2010 to 2019

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is globally increasing due to changes in risk factors such as gestational age, obesity, and socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined trends of GDM prevalence over ten years using a real-world Primary Health Care database from Catalonia (Spain).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pregnant women screened for GDM was conducted, using clinical and SES data from the SIDIAP database.

RESULTS

Among 221,806 women studied from 2010 to 2019,17,587 had GDM, equating to a 7.9% prevalence (95% CI 7.8-8.04). GDM subjects were older (33.5 ± 5.1 vs. 31.2 ± 5.6 years; p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (29.2 ± 5.1 vs .27.8 ± 4.8 kg/m²; p < 0.001) than non-GDM individuals. Overall GDM prevalence remained unchanged throughout the study, although an increase was observed in younger women (below 20 years: 1.28% [95% CI 0.59-2.42] in 2010 to 2.22% [95% CI 0.96-4.33] in 2019, p = 0.02; ages 20-25.9 years: 3.62% [95% CI 3.12-4.17] in 2010 to 4.63% [95% CI 3.88-5.48)] in 2019, p = 0.02). Age, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, deprived SES, and previous hypertension and dyslipidaemia were positively associated with GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers insights into GDM prevalence in Catalonia (Spain),showing overall stability except for a rising trend among younger women.

Influence of Socioeconomic Status on the Association Between Pregnancy Complications and Premature Coronary Artery Disease: Linking Three Cohorts

Background

We hypothesized that there is an influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on association between pregnancy complications and premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) risk.

Materials and Methods

This project involved a data linkage approach merging three databases of South Australian cohorts using retrospective, age-matched case-control study design. Cases (n = 721), that is, women aged <60 years from Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia (CADOSA) were linked to South Australian Perinatal Statistics Collection (SAPSC) to ascertain prior pregnancy outcomes and SES. Controls (n = 194) were selected from North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), comprising women who were healthy or had health conditions unrelated to CAD, age matched to CADOSA (±5 years), and linked to SAPSC to determine prior pregnancy outcomes and SES. This project performed comparative analysis of SES using socioeconomic indexes for areas-index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage (SEIFA-IRSAD) scores across three databases.

Results

Findings revealed that SEIFA-IRSAD scores at the time of pregnancy (p-value = 0.005) and increase in SEIFA-IRSAD scores over time (p-value = 0.040) were significantly associated with PCAD. In addition, when models were adjusted for SEIFA-IRSAD scores at the time of pregnancy and age, risk factors including placenta-mediated pregnancy complications such as preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] = 4.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-13.03) and history of a miscarriage (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.02-4.49), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors including smoking (OR = 8.60, 95% CI: 3.25-22.75) were significantly associated with PCAD. When the model was adjusted for change in SEIFA-IRSAD scores (from CADOSA/NWAHS to SAPSC) and age, pregnancy-mediated pregnancy complications including preterm birth (OR = 4.40, 95% CI: 1.61-12.05) and history of a miscarriage (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.00-4.35), and CVD risk factor smoking (OR = 8.75, 95% CI: 3.32-23.07) were significantly associated with PCAD.

Conclusion

SES at the time of pregnancy and change in SES were not associated with PCAD risk.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in West Virginia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed that GDM prevalence was significantly higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (8.59 % vs 7.77 %). The risk of GDM was 12 % higher during the pandemic vs. pre-pandemic (aRR = 1.12, 95 % CI 1.06, 1.19) and the aRD = 0.95 % (95 % CI 0.56 %, 1.33 %) adjusting for maternal age and substance use in pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

GDM rates in WV increased from the period directly before the COVID-19 pandemic to during the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is needed to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of pandemics and pandemic-related risk factors for this observed association. Supporting pregnant individuals during such events is critical to both maternal and child health.

How does high socioeconomic status affect maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes? A population-based study among American women

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of high SES on multiple pregnancy outcomes, while controlling for confounding factors.

Methods

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), the largest American medical database including 20 % of annual hospital admissions, we studied the years 2004-2014 inclusively. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study consisting of women from different median household income quartiles throughout the United States. Women in the highest household income quartile were compared to those in all other lower income quartiles combined. Chi-square and Fischer exact tests were used to compare demographic and baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were carried to adjust for confounding factors, including ethnicity, pre-existing conditions, smoking status, obesity, illicit drug use and insurance type.

Results

Among 5,448,255 deliveries during the study period with income data, 1,218,989 deliveries were to women from the wealthiest median household income. These women were more likely to be older, Caucasian, and have private medical insurance (P < 0.05, all). They were less likely to smoke, have chronic hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, and use illicit drugs (P < 0.05, all). They were less likely to develop complications including gestational hypertension (aOR 0.87 95 %CI 0.85-0.88), preeclampsia (aOR 0.88 95 %CI 0.86-0.89), eclampsia (aOR 0.81 95 %CI 0.66-0.99), gestational diabetes (aOR 0.91 95 %CI 0.89-0.92), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (aOR 0.92 95 %CI 0.88-0.96), preterm birth (aOR 0.90 95 %CI 0.89-0.92), and placental abruption (aOR 0.89 95 %CI 0.85-0.93). They were less likely to have an intra-uterine fetal death (IUFD) (aOR 0.80 95 %CI 0.74-0.86), but more likely to deliver neonates with congenital anomalies (aOR 1.10 95 %CI 1.04-1.20).

Conclusions

Higher SES predisposes to better pregnancy outcomes, even when controlled for confounding factors such as ethnicity and underlying baseline health status. Efforts are required in order to eliminate health disparities in pregnancy.

Psychosocial and sociodemographic factors associated with gestational blood glucose levels in women attending public hospitals: Results from baseline of MAASTHI cohort

BACKGROUND

Understanding psychosocial environment is important for improving maternal and fetal health outcomes during pregnancy. We aimed to identify the association between gestational blood glucose levels and psychosocial and demographic factors in pregnant women.

METHODS

In the MAASTHI pregnancy cohort in Bengaluru, we assessed depressive symptoms, and social support using validated scales at baseline in first trimester. A 2-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered between 24-36 weeks of gestation. We examined the relation between psychosocial factors assessed at baseline and gestational blood glucose levels in second/third trimester using multivariate linear regression and explored association between serum cortisol and gestational blood glucose levels in subgroup samples.

RESULTS

We found that 9% of pregnant women had depressive symptoms and 14.3% had Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Psychosocial factors, including depressive symptoms, have a significant correlation with gestational fasting(β = 0.12, p-value<0.05) and postprandial blood sugar level(β = 0.23, p-value<0.05) and poor social support were found to have a significant association with gestational fasting blood glucose levels(β = 1.45, p-value <0.05) and postprandial blood sugar levels(β = 2.60, p-value <0.05). The sociodemographic factors such as respondent education, occupation, social and economic status were associated with gestational blood sugar after adjusting for potential confounder variables.

CONCLUSION

Depressive symptoms and poor social support earlier in pregnancy were significantly associated with increased gestational blood glucose levels. Early detection and recognition of modifiable psychosocial risk factors can reduce glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Evaluating the benefits of screening for psychosocial factors and timely management of gestational diabetes mellitus can be helpful in India.

An Evaluation of the Second Trimester Thyroid Function Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as glucose intolerance in a female with its onset or first recognition during pregnancy. Females with GDM are at higher risk of developing antenatal complications like preeclampsia during pregnancy and increased risk of type 2 diabetes as well as cardiovascular disorders later in their life. Maternal thyroid changes in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy have been widely related to the risk of GDM. Hypothyroidism during pregnancy is associated with early and late complications like abortions, anaemia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption and postpartum haemorrhage, impaired infant neurodevelopment, and low birth weight.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the thyroid function test (TFT) (serum fT3, fT4, TSH) and thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti TPO) between GDM and non GDM pregnant women in the second trimester and to correlate the adverse pregnancy outcomes with TFT in GDM and non GDM women.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences, and Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital, Delhi. About 350 pregnant women from 13 weeks till 28 weeks period of gestation were screened out of which 40 GDM and 40 non GDM women were selected after performing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A TFT and anti TPO test were compared between GDM and non GDM participants. Furthermore, various parameters like sociodemographic profile, mode of delivery, pregnancy outcomes, and adverse maternal and adverse neonatal outcomes were compared.

CONCLUSION

The mean age of GDM women is found to be more than non GDM women. The mean TFT values are significantly lower in women with GDM as compared to non GDM women. In addition, higher values of anti TPO antibody (thyroid autoantibody) were found in the GDM group which aids in insulin resistance. Maternal complications like polyhydramnios, preterm labour, and pregnancy-induced hypertension were found to be more frequent in the GDM group compared to the non GDM group, but the results were statistically not significant. There was a higher incidence of caesarean delivery in the GDM group. Thus, we recommend the implementation of routine thyroid function profile testing in all antenatal females especially those who are at risk of developing GDM. Our study is one of the few Indian studies to evaluate the association of TFT in GDM, and we recommend similar research with a larger sample size and postnatal follow-up.

A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy

Two important maternal cardiometabolic disorders (CMDs), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) (including pre-eclampsia) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), result in a large disease burden for pregnant individuals worldwide. A global consensus has not been reached about the diagnostic criteria for HDP and GDM, making it challenging to assess differences in their disease burden between countries and areas. However, both diseases show an unevenly distributed disease burden for regions with a low income or middle income, or low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), or regions with lower sociodemographic and human development indexes. In addition to many common clinical, demographic and behavioural risk factors, the development and clinical consequences of maternal CMDs are substantially influenced by the social determinants of health, such as systemic marginalization. Although progress has been occurring in the early screening and management of HDP and GDM, the accuracy and long-term effects of such screening and management programmes are still under investigation. In addition to pharmacological therapies and lifestyle modifications at the individual level, a multilevel approach in conjunction with multisector partnership should be adopted to tackle the public health issues and health inequity resulting from maternal CMDs. The current COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health service delivery, with women with maternal CMDs being particularly vulnerable to this public health crisis.

Effectiveness of exercise intervention during pregnancy on high-risk women for gestational diabetes mellitus prevention: A meta-analysis of published RCTs

Objective

We aimed at investigating the preventive role of exercise intervention during pregnancy, in high-risk women for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Materials and methods

We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated exercise interventions during pregnancy on women at high risk for GDM. Data were combined with random effects models. Between study heterogeneity (Cochran’s Q statistic) and the extent of study effects variability [I² with 95% confidence interval (CI)] were estimated. Sensitivity analyses examined the effect of population, intervention, and study characteristics. We also evaluated the potential for publication bias.

Results

Among the 1,508 high-risk women who were analyzed in 9 RCTs, 374 (24.8%) [160 (21.4%) in intervention, and 214 (28.1%) in control group] developed GDM. Women who received exercise intervention during pregnancy were less likely to develop GDM compared to those who followed the standard prenatal care (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.52, 0.93; P-value 0.02) [Q 10.08, P-value 0.26; I² 21% (95%CI 0, 62%]. Studies with low attrition bias also showed a similar result (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.97; P-value 0.03). A protective effect was also supported when analysis was limited to studies including women with low education level (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.40, 0.74; P-value 0.0001); studies with exercise intervention duration more than 20 weeks (OR 0.54; 95%CI 0.40, 0.74; P-value 0.0007); and studies with a motivation component in the intervention (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.50, 0.96; P-value 0.03). We could not exclude large variability in study effects because the upper limit of I² confidence interval was higher than 50% for all analyses. There was no conclusive evidence for small study effects (P-value 0.31).

Conclusions

Our study might support a protective effect of exercise intervention during pregnancy for high-risk women to prevent GDM. The protective result should be corroborated by large, high quality RCTs.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among Pregnant Women Attending Ante-natal Clinic at a Secondary Care Health Facility in Haryana, India

Introduction: Gestational diabetes has serious health effects during pregnancy and childbirth. We estimated the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among pregnant women in a secondary care hospital in Haryana.

Methods: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study, done in an ante-natal clinic (ANC) at a sub-district hospital (SDH), Faridabad district of Haryana, India. Eligible pregnant women attending the ANC clinic were recruited. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with 75 g of glucose was done with a collection of blood for fasting blood sugar (FBS) and two-hour post-OGTT blood glucose. A pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule was administered. Both the modified International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria (IADPSGC) and the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) criteria were used. Data were presented as percentages, means, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regressions were done. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results: Of the 623 eligible participants, 66.1% were within the 20-25 age group. The GDM was found in 14.1% (95%CI: 11.5-17.1) participants as per modified IADPSG criteria and 6.7% (95%CI: 4.9-9.0) participants as per DIPSI criteria, respectively. Increasing age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.24 (95% CI: 1.05-1.47), p=0.008] and increasing years of schooling [AOR: 1.19 (1.01-1.41), p=0.032] were significantly associated with GDM by DIPSI criteria. Family history of DM was also found to have an increased odds with GDM using modified IADPSG criteria [AOR 2.87 (95% CI: 1.09-7.54), p=0.032]. 

Conclusion: Considerable proportion of pregnant women were found to have GDM in a Sub-district hospital at Ballabgarh in north India. The study highlighted the need and generated evidence about the feasibility of GDM screening utilizing routine staff in a secondary care facility.

Impacts of gestational diabetes on quality of life in Chinese pregnant women in urban Tianjin, China

AIMS

This study aimed to examine impacts of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on quality of life (QoL) domains in Chinese pregnant women.

METHODS

We recruited 13,358 pregnant women in Tianjin, China. GDM was diagnosed using the criteria of International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group. QoL was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. General linear model was used to obtain β-coefficient and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of GDM for QoL domain and summary scores.

RESULTS

7.25% of the pregnant women developed GDM. Among the QoL domain and summary scores, only general health (GH) score was lower in the GDM group than in the non-GDM group. GDM and advanced maternal age (i.e., ≥ versus <30 years) were negatively associated with GH in multivariable analyses (β-coefficient: -1.17, 95%CI: -2.17 to -0.17 & -0.79, -1.40 to -0.18, respectively). In subgroup analyses, the β-coefficient of GDM for GH among women with maternal age ≥30 years was enhanced to -2.17 (-3.94 to -0.40) in multivariable analysis while the β-coefficient of GDM for GH among women aged <30 years was attenuated to non-significance.

CONCLUSIONS

GDM and advanced maternal age were associated with reducing GH, and presence of advanced maternal age markedly increased the effect of GDM on GH.

Association between maternal education level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Aims: The association between maternal education and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been discussed in considerable studies, yet the inconsistent findings still exist. The aim of this study is to investigate whether maternal education level is associated with GDM risk.Material and methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to October 2018. Observational studies on the association between maternal education level and GDM risk were included. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for highest versus lowest level of maternal education were estimated using a random-effects model.Results: As compared to lowest education level, the pooled OR for women with highest education level was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.53-1.05). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and family history of diabetes, the estimated effect of maternal education on GDM were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.92), respectively.Conclusions: Our results indicate that there is no significant association between maternal education level and risk of GDM.