Reoperation, reamputation, and new ulceration following complete or partial toe amputation among diabetic and non-diabetic patients

Comparison of Two Techniques for Proximal Margin Analysis of Toe Amputations: A Retrospective Review

Toe amputations are a common podiatric procedure for treatment of osteomyelitis. Whether or not the surgeon obtains a surgical cure, thus resolving the infection, can be difficult to assess. Obtaining a proximal bone margin can assist the treatment team in deciding the duration of postoperative antibiotics, need for reoperation, and postoperative care. The two senior surgeons use different methods to analyze proximal bone margins. The first surgeon obtains a microbiologic culture from the remaining bone, either at the proximal phalanx or metatarsal head, following the removal of the toe to be reviewed for osteomyelitis. Per the second surgeon's technique, the pathologist only analyzes the proximal aspect of the amputated toe for presence of osteomyelitis. Our goal is to analyze the reoperation and reamputation rates between the techniques in which the proximal margin specimens are obtained. A retrospective chart review was performed on all isolated toe or partial toe amputations from March 2017 to September 2022. There were 115 patients who met inclusion criteria. Reoperation and reamputation rates were analyzed for positive and negative infection margins from intraoperative cultures. Our study found an overall 28% reoperation rate and 26% reamputation rate for the negative margins group. In the positive proximal margin group, there was an overall 48% reoperation rate and 44% reamputation rate. Our analysis did not find a statistically significant difference between the reamputation rate in the negative margins group and the reamputation rate in the positive margins group. In conclusion, our study found that a positive proximal margin for osteomyelitis exhibited a nearly double reoperation and reamputation rate compared to patients with a negative margin, and that one margin analysis technique was not inferior to the other in regards to the need for additional surgeries.

Decision-making processes for non-emergency diabetes-related lower extremity amputations: A scoping review

Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer has significant lifestyle impacts. Whilst often considered a last resort, amputation can overcome the burden of ulcer management, for an improved quality of life. However, limited research has been conducted to understand how the decision to amputate is made for people with a chronic ulcer when amputation is not required as a medical emergency. Therefore, the aim was to identify and map key concepts in the literature which describe the decision-making for diabetes-related amputations. This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's PRISMA scoping review framework. Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched for papers which described clinical reasoning and/or decision-making processes for diabetes-related amputation. Data were extracted and mapped to corresponding domains of the World Health Organisation's International Classification of functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Ninety-four papers were included. Personal factors including emotional wellbeing, quality of life, and treatment goals are key considerations for an elective amputation. It is important to consider an individual's lifestyle and personal circumstances, as well as the pathology when deciding between amputation or conservative management. This highlights the importance of a holistic and shared decision-making process for amputation which includes assessment of a person's lifestyle and function.

Analysis of repeated lesions after diabetic forefoot amputation

AIM

This study was performed to analyze the clinical characteristics, related factors, and prognosis of repeated lesions after diabetic forefoot amputation.

METHODS

The medical records of 998 patients who underwent forefoot amputation because of their diabetic feet from March 2002 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 508 selected patients with a follow-up period of at least 6 months, 288 had repeated lesions in the forefoot, and 220 did not have repeated lesions. The related factors of repeated lesions were compared and analyzed. Of the patients with repeated lesions, 142 and 104 on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides, respectively were also compared and examined.

RESULTS

Repeated lesions were statistically significant in diabetic polyneuropathy, vascular calcification, and dialysis. However, the anatomical positions of diabetic foot lesions, causes of lesions, anatomical amputation levels, number of surgeries, and management duration had no significant differences. Contralateral lesions occurred 8 months later than ipsilateral lesions, but reamputation above the Lisfranc joint was more frequent and prognosis was poorer.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated lesions were affected by general conditions, and the contralateral side must be carefully examined after diabetic forefoot amputation.