Adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with an increased risk of postpartum prediabetes and diabetes in Chinese women with gestational diabetes

Association between pregnancy-related complications and development of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Despite many systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the associations of pregnancy complications with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, previous umbrella reviews have only examined a single pregnancy complication. Here we have synthesised evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the associations of a wide range of pregnancy-related complications with risk of developing T2DM and hypertension.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception until 26 September 2022 for systematic reviews and meta-analysis examining the association between pregnancy complications and risk of T2DM and hypertension. Screening of articles, data extraction and quality appraisal (AMSTAR2) were conducted independently by two reviewers using Covidence software. Data were extracted for studies that examined the risk of T2DM and hypertension in pregnant women with the pregnancy complication compared to pregnant women without the pregnancy complication. Summary estimates of each review were presented using tables, forest plots and narrative synthesis and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) guidelines.

RESULTS

Ten systematic reviews were included. Two pregnancy complications were identified. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): One review showed GDM was associated with a 10-fold higher risk of T2DM at least 1 year after pregnancy (relative risk (RR) 9.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.14 to 12.67) and although the association differed by ethnicity (white: RR 16.28 (95% CI 15.01 to 17.66), non-white: RR 10.38 (95% CI 4.61 to 23.39), mixed: RR 8.31 (95% CI 5.44 to 12.69)), the between subgroups difference were not statistically significant at 5% significance level. Another review showed GDM was associated with higher mean blood pressure at least 3 months postpartum (mean difference in systolic blood pressure: 2.57 (95% CI 1.74 to 3.40) mmHg and mean difference in diastolic blood pressure: 1.89 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.46) mmHg). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP): Three reviews showed women with a history of HDP were 3 to 6 times more likely to develop hypertension at least 6 weeks after pregnancy compared to women without HDP (meta-analysis with largest number of studies: odds ratio (OR) 4.33 (3.51 to 5.33)) and one review reported a higher rate of T2DM after HDP (hazard ratio (HR) 2.24 (1.95 to 2.58)) at least a year after pregnancy. One of the three reviews and five other reviews reported women with a history of preeclampsia were 3 to 7 times more likely to develop hypertension at least 6 weeks postpartum (meta-analysis with the largest number of studies: OR 3.90 (3.16 to 4.82) with one of these reviews reporting the association was greatest in women from Asia (Asia: OR 7.54 (95% CI 2.49 to 22.81), Europe: OR 2.19 (95% CI 0.30 to 16.02), North and South America: OR 3.32 (95% CI 1.26 to 8.74)).

CONCLUSIONS

GDM and HDP are associated with a greater risk of developing T2DM and hypertension. Common confounders adjusted for across the included studies in the reviews were maternal age, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic status, smoking status, pre-pregnancy and current BMI, parity, family history of T2DM or cardiovascular disease, ethnicity, and time of delivery. Further research is needed to evaluate the value of embedding these pregnancy complications as part of assessment for future risk of T2DM and chronic hypertension.

Risk factors associated with early postpartum glucose intolerance in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis was aimed at exploring the incidence and risk factors of glucose intolerance in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) at 6-12 weeks postpartum to inform the development of preventive strategies.

METHOD

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database and China Biology Medicine Database for entries between January 1990 and September 2022. The search terms included gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum, glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0.

RESULT

We included 37 studies, with 21 and 16 having low and medium risk of bias, respectively. The incidence of glucose intolerance in women with GDM 6-12 weeks postpartum was 27% (95% CI: 0.22-0.33). The following risk factors for GDM 6-12 weeks postpartum were identified: insulin use during pregnancy (OR = 3.23; 95% CI: 2.35-4.44), family history of diabetes (OR = 2.94; 95% CI: 1.98-4.33), abnormal fasting glucose levels at 24-28 weeks of gestation (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.07-1.25), high pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.23-2.15), abnormal triglyceride levels during 28-40 weeks of gestation (OR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.18-4.03), abnormal HbA1c levels at 28-40 weeks of gestation (OR = 6.62; 95% CI: 4.71-9.30), history of previous GDM (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.27-3.49), and high 1-h glucose levels at 24-28 weeks of gestation (OR = 1.16; 95% CI:1.06-1.28).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of glucose intolerance in GDM patients at 6-12 weeks postpartum was high. To prevent early postpartum glucose intolerance, healthcare providers should develop individualized interventions for GDM patients, depending on existing risk factors.

The effects of a couple-based gestational diabetes mellitus intervention on self-management and pregnancy outcomes: A randomised controlled trial

AIMS

To estimate the effectiveness of the Couples Coping with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) Programme on GDM self-management and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial among pregnant women with suboptimal GDM self-management and their partners was undertaken. Couples recruited from three hospitals in China were randomly allocated to either intervention (n = 70) or control (n = 70) conditions. Couples in the intervention group underwent the couple-based intervention (GDM education, shared illness appraisals, initiation of collaborative action and consolidation of collaborative action). Women in the control group received individual GDM education. Data were analysed using the independent samples t-test, chi-square test, and generalised estimating equations.

RESULTS

GDM knowledge for the women and their partners and GDM self-management significantly improved in both the intervention and control groups, with stronger improvement in the intervention group. Women in the intervention group gained significantly less weight than those in the control group (11.2 kg ± 2.8 kg vs 13.1 kg ± 2.6 kg, p = 0.008). Infant birth weights were significantly lower in the intervention group (3.2 kg ± 0.3 kg vs 3.4 kg ± 0.4 kg, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in other pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Couples Coping with GDM Programme was associated with improvements in GDM knowledge of women and their partners and in women's self-management, and with lower gestational weight gain and infant birth weight.