Concordance of nasal and diabetic foot ulcer staphylococcal colonization

Phenotypic Variation in Staphylococcus aureus during Colonisation Involves Antibiotic-Tolerant Cell Types

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterial species that is commonly found colonising healthy individuals but that presents a paradoxical nature: simultaneously, it can migrate within the body and cause a range of diseases. Many of these become chronic by resisting immune responses, antimicrobial treatment, and medical intervention. In part, this ability to persist can be attributed to the adoption of multiple cell types within a single cellular population. These dynamics in the S. aureus cell population could be the result of its interplay with host cells or other co-colonising bacteria-often coagulase-negative Staphylococcal (CoNS) species. Further understanding of the unique traits of S. aureus alternative cell types, the drivers for their selection or formation during disease, as well as their presence even during non-pathological colonisation could advance the development of diagnostic tools and drugs tailored to target specific cells that are eventually responsible for chronic infections.

Nasal MRSA carriage is a risk factor for development of antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot ulcers and is significantly higher than diabetic and non-diabetic individuals without foot ulcer

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major complication of diabetes often impacted by polymicrobial infection in the wound site. Diabetic patients are immunocompromised in nature and hence vulnerable to infection once the skin barrier is breached. Microbiological culture-based methods show that Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is the most frequently isolated bacteria from the DFU wounds. SA and its most clinically important antibiotic resistant variant methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are commonly found in the nasal vestibule and colonization of SA as well as MRSA in any wound site can aggravate the condition. We hypothesize that the presence of nasal MRSA carriage can serve as a potential risk factor contributing to the emergence of antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot ulcer wounds.

METHODS

In the present study, we have compared the carriage of SA and MRSA in nasal cavity and foot skin among DFU patients (D+F+, n = 50), diabetic patients without any ulcer (D+F-, n = 50), and healthy controls (D-F-, n = 40) by using bacterial culture and PCR based methods. The D+F+, D+F- and D-F-individuals were further categorized based on the presence or absence of MRSA and clinical parameters were compared between MRSA+ ve and MRSA-ve individuals in each of the three groups mentioned above.

RESULTS

Our results show that, (a) nasal MRSA carriage is significantly higher (p < 0.05) in D+F+ group than the D+F- and D-F- and significantly associated with wound MRSA carriage in D+ F+ individuals (O.R. = 4.09; 95% C.I. = 1.12-15.05) and (b) the HbA1C level is significantly higher (p < 0.02) in wound MRSA positive, compared to MRSA negative D+F+ patients. Interestingly more than half of the MRSA (64%) isolated from DFU wound were identified to be multidrug resistant.

CONCLUSION

These findings strongly suggest that nasal MRSA carriage can act as a risk factor for development of antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot ulcers and it is therefore important to screen nasal and wound sites of these patients regularly. We have also developed a rapid multiplex PCR assay to detect MRSA from clinical isolates or microbial DNA isolated from clinical samples in the hospital settings.

Staphylococcus aureus Adaptation to the Skin in Health and Persistent/Recurrent Infections

Staphylococcus aureus is a microorganism with an incredible capability to adapt to different niches within the human body. Approximately between 20 and 30% of the population is permanently but asymptomatically colonized with S. aureus in the nose, and another 30% may carry S. aureus intermittently. It has been established that nasal colonization is a risk factor for infection in other body sites, including mild to severe skin and soft tissue infections. The skin has distinct features that make it a hostile niche for many bacteria, therefore acting as a strong barrier against invading microorganisms. Healthy skin is desiccated; it has a low pH at the surface; the upper layer is constantly shed to remove attached bacteria; and several host antimicrobial peptides are produced. However, S. aureus is able to overcome these defenses and colonize this microenvironment. Moreover, this bacterium can very efficiently adapt to the stressors present in the skin under pathological conditions, as it occurs in patients with atopic dermatitis or suffering chronic wounds associated with diabetes. The focus of this manuscript is to revise the current knowledge concerning how S. aureus adapts to such diverse skin conditions causing persistent and recurrent infections.

Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal PCR to streamline antimicrobial use in treatment of diabetic foot infection with or without osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) guidelines recommend empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-targeted therapy in settings where there is high prevalence of MRSA infections or in cases of severe infection; however, they do not provide recommendations for de-escalation. This approach has the potential to increase unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics; therefore, additional strategies are needed to optimize appropriate antibiotic use. This study evaluates the effect of MRSA nasal PCR testing on MRSA-targeted antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in patients with DFI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective quasi-experimental study of patients admitted to South Texas Veterans Health Care System for DFI, with or without osteomyelitis (OM), who had an MRSA nasal PCR and culture data. Eligible patients were identified from the Corporate Data Warehouse and reviewed via electronic health record. Patients were allocated into two groups: PRE (5/1/2019-4/30/2020) and POST (12/1/2020-11/30/2021) protocol implementation for de-escalation or avoidance of MRSA-targeted antibiotics. The primary outcome was median (interquartile range [IQR]) hours of empiric inpatient MRSA-targeted antibiotic therapy. A Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to assess the difference between the groups for the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients needing MRSA coverage added back for MRSA after de-escalation, hospital readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS), patient mortality, and acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were included (83 PRE; 68 POST). Most patients were male (98% PRE; 97% POST) with a median age of 64 (IQR, 56-72) years. Incidence of MRSA in DFI in the cohort was 14.7% overall (12% PRE and 17.6% POST). MRSA was detected via nasal PCR in 12% of patients 15.7% PRE and 7.4% POST). After protocol implementation, there was a significant decrease in empiric MRSA-targeted antibiotic therapy use, from a median of 72 (IQR, 27-120) hours in the PRE group, to 24 (IQR, 12-72) hours in the POST group (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found for other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study of patients presenting to a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital with DFI identified a statistically significant decrease in median duration of MRSA-targeted antibiotic use post-protocol implementation. This suggests a favorable effect of MRSA nasal PCR for de-escalation or avoidance of MRSA-targeted antibiotics in DFI.

Molecular Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Nasal Cavity and Wound Infections Among Diabetic Patients

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen contributing to diabetic foot infections (DFI). Nasal transmission of S. aureus potentially increases the risk of endogenous infection. The aim of this study was to determine the genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance profile of S. aureus isolates in nasal and wound samples from diabetic patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2018 to September 2019. S. aureus was isolated from the anterior nares and wounds of diabetic patients. All S. aureus isolates were characterized by detection of resistance and virulence genes (mecA, ermA, ermC, hla, hlb, hlg, sea, lukDE, pvl), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec)-typing and staphylococcal protein A (spa)-typing. A total of 34 S. aureus were isolated from the wounds of 115 diabetic patients with DFI. Twenty-four S. aureus isolates were collected from the anterior nares of patients, and thirteen patients had concurrent S. aureus in nasal and wound specimens. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in nasal specimens was noticeable (41.7%), and the most common spa-type in nasal and wound specimens was t14870. Nearly half of the patients with concurrent S. aureus in wound and nasal specimens had similar isolates from both sites. Our data suggest that detection and screening of S. aureus colonization in the nasal cavity may prevent subsequent endogenous infections, particularly with MRSA strains.

Impact of Nares Swabs in the Operative Management of Distal Lower Extremity Infections

Associations between nares surveillance cultures and lower extremity wound cultures remains a topic of discussion in the literature and in clinical practice. Reports are limited due to the questionable accuracy of bedside foot cultures. A retrospective review of our institution's lower extremity wounds requiring surgical management distal to the tibial tuberosity was conducted. Deep intraoperative tissue cultures collected in a sterile operating field were referenced against nares cultures from the same hospitalization. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of nares cultures for predicting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection were determined. Four hundred and forty unique patients with both nares and wound cultures met inclusion criteria. Comorbid diagnoses revealed 66.82%, 30.68%, and 32.27% of patients had diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and/or peripheral arterial disease, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were found to be 53.13% and 96.13%, respectively. Prevalence of MRSA in a lower extremity wound was 14.9%, and accuracy of nares culture was 90.04% (CI: 86.91%-92.65%). A review of 30 false negative cases was conducted. Using exclusion criteria of a hospital admission within 60 days of presentation, history of MRSA infection, and/or presentation from a long-term care facility, negative predictive value of MRSA nares colonization was 99.51%. A case of necrotizing fasciitis accounted for one outlier. This data demonstrates that nares surveillance swabs have excellent diagnostic performance in ruling out MRSA infections in foot and ankle wounds. Further analysis is required to determine whether this performance is improved in specialized subgroups or dependent on temporal proximity.

The Clinical Value of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening in the Management of Diabetic Foot Infections

Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important risk factor for diabetic foot infections (DFIs). We explored herein the clinical value of MRSA-nasal screening in the management of DFIs. In this retrospective case-control study, patients admitted with a DFI between 1/1/2014-6/30/2020 were studied and divided into cases (positive MRSA-nasal screening) and controls (negative MRSA-nasal). We included 171 patients (22 cases and 149 controls). MRSA nasal screening had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. Compared to controls, cases were treated with intravenous vancomycin for a longer duration: (median [IQR], 5[3,11] vs 2[2,6]) days, P = .037). In multivariate analysis, a negative MRSA nasal screening was associated with a 74% decreased risk of AKI (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.07-0.89). MRSA nasal screening in patients admitted with DFI has a high NPV. Obtained early, it can shorten the duration of intravenous vancomycin, consequently preventing AKI.

Predictive Value of MRSA Nares Colonization in Diabetic Foot Infections: A Systematic Review and Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis

The primary objective of this study was to assess the negative predictive value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swabs in MRSA diabetic foot infections. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 1, 2020. The following search string was used: (methicillin-resistant S. aureus OR MRSA) AND (nasal OR nares) AND (diabetic OR foot OR diabetic foot infections). All studies that contained data comparing MRSA nasal swab positivity to wound cultures from diabetic foot infections and met the inclusion criteria were included. Among the 86 relevant studies, 6 studies with 8706 diabetic patients were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy reviews was followed. The primary meta-analysis outcomes were the negative and positive predictive values of MRSA nasal swabs for MRSA diabetic foot infections. The pooled specificity and pooled sensitivity were determined by generating hierarchical summary receiver characteristic operating curves. In the bivariate meta-analysis, involving the 6 studies, pooled sensitivity and specificity was 41.7% (95% confidence interval = 32.9, 51) and 94.1% (95% confidence interval = 89.5, 96.8), respectively. In low-moderate MRSA prevalence levels (<15%), negative predictive value of MRSA nasal swab was >90% and positive predictive value was <55%. This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with diabetic foot infections, the nasal swab MRSA screen has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value in regions of low to moderate prevalence of MRSA diabetic foot infections.

Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among insulin-dependent diabetic individuals in Brazil

BACKGROUND

People with diabetes mellitus, especially insulin-dependent diabetic patients, are a risk group for staphylococcal infections. Asymptomatic infection with Staphylococcus aureus is common and favors dissemination of the microorganism, rendering these individuals a source of infection. This study aimed to characterize the resistance profile, clonal profile and sequence type, as well as to analyze the prevalence and risk factors for nasal and oropharyngeal carriage of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from insulin-dependent diabetic individuals in the city of Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

METHODS

Staphylococcus aureus was collected from the nasopharynx and oropharynx of 312 community-dwelling insulin-dependent diabetic individuals over a period of 3 years (October 2015 to December 2018). The isolates were characterized by susceptibility profiling, detection of the mecA gene, SCCmec typing, and molecular typing by PFGE and MLST. The risk factors associated with S. aureus and MRSA carriage were determined by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of colonization with S. aureus and MRSA was 30.4% and 4.8%, respectively. Fifteen of the 112 S. aureus isolates carried the mecA gene; SCCmec type IV was identified in 10 isolates, SCCmec type I in three, and SCCmec type II in two. Among the 15 resistant isolates (MRSA), four were susceptible to oxacillin/cefoxitin by the disc diffusion method and one MSSA isolate was resistant to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The analysis of risk factors revealed a protective effect of age and lung disease, while lower-extremity ulcers were a risk factor for S. aureus. For MRSA, only male gender was significantly associated as a risk factor in multivariate analysis. Clonal profile analysis demonstrated the formation of clusters among MRSA isolates from different patients, with the identification of ST5-IV, ST5-I, and ST8-IV. Isolates carrying ST398 were identified among MSSA and MRSA (ST398-IV).

CONCLUSION

Our findings reinforce the importance of epidemiological studies of S. aureus carriage, especially in populations at high risk of infections such as diabetics. The data suggest widespread dissemination of MRSA in the population of insulin-dependent diabetic patients studied, as well as the emergence of important lineages among these individuals.

Correlation Between Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nares Colonization and MRSA Diabetic Foot Infections

Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection (DFI) guidelines indicate empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage for patients with a history of MRSA infection, when local prevalence of MRSA is high, or infection is clinically severe. These recommendations may lead to overutilization of empiric MRSA coverage, which can result in serious consequences. A strong negative predictive value (NPV) has been reported in literature for pneumonia, and recently, for all anatomical sites of infection. While these findings are promising, further validation is needed before clinicians may confidently use MRSA nares to guide empiric therapy for DFIs. A retrospective electronic medical record review was completed between October 1, 2013 and October 1, 2019. Patients met inclusion criteria if they were at least 18, admitted with a DFI, had MRSA nares test results, and DFI cultures. Patients were excluded if pregnant or MRSA infection within 1 year prior to index admission for DFI. A total of 200 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of study participants were male with a mean age of 63. NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs was determined to be 94% and positive predictive value 58%. Sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 94%, respectively. Results of this study are consistent with prior literature supporting strong correlation of NPV for MRSA nares. The DFIs evaluated suggest a strong NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs, which may allow for faster de-escalation of empiric anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy and lower risk of adverse events associated with anti-MRSA therapy.

Diabetic Foot Infections: Local Prevalence of and Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

We identified deep diabetic foot infections by culture and conducted a case–control study examining the risk factors for moderate to severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) diabetic foot infections. Our MRSA prevalence was lower than literature values; PsA was higher. Gangrene may be predictive of Pseudomonas infection.

Principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic antibiotic therapy in persons with a diabetic foot infection (DFI) is frequent, increasing the risk of promoting resistance to common pathogens. Applying principles of antibiotic stewardship may help avoid this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

We performed a systematic review of the literature, especially seeking recently published studies, for data on the role and value of antibiotic stewardship (especially reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy) in community and hospital populations of persons with a DFI.

SUMMARY

We found very few publications specifically concerning antibiotic stewardship in persons with a DFI. The case-mix of these patients is substantial and infection plays only one part among several chronic problems. As with other types of infections, attempting to prevent infections and avoiding or reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy are perhaps the best ways to reduce antibiotic prescribing in the DFI population. The field is complex and necessitates knowledge over the current scientific literature and clinical experience. On a larger scale, clinical pathways, guidelines, and recommendations are additionally supportive.

Novel Research Models for Staphylococcus aureus Small Colony Variants (SCV) Development: Co-pathogenesis and Growth Rate

Staphylococcus aureus remains a great burden on the healthcare system. Despite prescribed treatments often seemingly to be successful, S. aureus can survive and cause a relapsing infection which cannot be cleared. These infections are in part due to quasi-dormant sub-population which is tolerant to antibiotics and able to evade the host immune response. These include Small Colony Variants (SCVs). Because SCVs readily revert to non-SCV cell types under laboratory conditions, the characterization of SCVs has been problematic. This mini-review covers the phenotypic and genetic changes in stable SCVs including the selection of SCVs by and interactions with other bacterial species.

Antimicrobial stewardship opportunities among inpatients with diabetic foot infections: microbiology results from a tertiary hospital multidisciplinary unit

Among 125 inpatients with diabetic foot infections managed by a multidisciplinary foot ulcer unit, knowledge of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation status assisted decision-making to prescribe appropriately or with-hold empiric anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapy. Despite adherence to national guidelines, apparent overuse of anti-pseudomonal therapy was frequent, providing potential antimicrobial stewardship opportunities.

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among diabetic patients: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Diabetic patients have multiple risk factors for colonisation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a nosocomial pathogen associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of MRSA among diabetic patients.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published up to May 2018 that reported primary data on the prevalence of MRSA in 10 or more diabetic patients. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and extracted the data. The main outcomes were the pooled prevalence rates of MRSA colonisation and infection among diabetic populations.

RESULTS

Eligible data sets were divided into three groups containing data about the prevalence of MRSA colonisation or in diabetic foot or other infections. From 23 data sets, the prevalence of MRSA colonisation among 11577 diabetics was 9.20% (95% CI, 6.26-12.63%). Comparison of data from 14 studies that examined diabetic and non-diabetic patients found that diabetics had a 4.75% greater colonisation rate (P < 0.0001). From 41 data sets, the prevalence of MRSA in 10994 diabetic foot infection patients was 16.78% (95% CI, 13.21-20.68%). Among 2147 non-foot skin and soft-tissue infections, the MRSA prevalence rate was 18.03% (95% CI, 6.64-33.41).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MRSA colonisation among diabetic patients is often higher than among non-diabetics; this may make targeted screening attractive. In the UK, many diabetic patients may already be covered by the current screening policies. The prevalence and impact of MRSA among diabetic healthcare workers requires further research. The high prevalence of MRSA among diabetic foot infections may have implications for antimicrobial resistance, and should encourage strategies aimed at infection prevention or alternative therapies.

Microbial Diversity of Chronic Wound and Successful Management of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Chronic ulcer, including diabetic ulcer, varicose ulcer, and pressure ulcer, negatively affects patients' quality of life. As microbiology plays an important role in the mechanism of pathology for chronic wound healing, this study concentrates on microecology environment of the wound and how Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) regulates wound bacteria. Method. The study took wound samples from 35 patients and analyzed bacteria variation before and after TCM treatment by 16s rRNA sequencing. All samples were evaluated from aspects of α-diversity, β-diversity, and Simpson's Diversity index. Result. After total DNA extraction, PCR, and 16S rRNA sequencing of wound bacteria from 35 individuals, it was discovered that younger patients with shorter course of disease have a higher microbial diversity and were easier to recover from ulcers. Additionally, gender also played a vital role in wound healing, and a significant microbial diversity existed between male and female patients. Conclusion. Patients with chronic ulcers achieved a positive effect after TCM treatment (skin-producing ointment). Mechanistically, TCM helped promote wound healing by regulating the wound microbiota.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection among patients with diabetic foot ulcer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in Taiwan, and to assess the concordance between colonizing and clinical MRSA isolates from the patients.

METHOD

A total of 354 nasal specimens were collected from 112 to 242 diabetic patients with and without foot ulcer, respectively. MRSA clinical isolates from DFU wound cultures were collected for comparison.

RESULTS

Nasal carriage rate of S. aureus and MRSA was similar between diabetic patients with and without foot ulcer (15.2% vs. 16.9% for S. aureus and 5.4% vs. 1.7% for MRSA). Nasal S. aureus colonization was an independent predictor for wound S. aureus infection (Odds ratio [OR]: 5.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-17.59), so did nasal MRSA colonization (OR: 19.09, 95% CI: 2.12-171.91). The levels of glycated hemoglobin, and the usage with immunosuppressant agent were associated with S. aureus nasal colonization while oral hypoglycemic agent usage a protective factor. Sequence type 59/staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec IV or V, the local endemic community-associated clone, accounted for 42% and 70% of the clinical and colonizing isolates, respectively. Six of 10 patients with paired colonizing and clinical isolates, either MRSA or methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, had a genetically identical strain from a single patient.

CONCLUSION

Less than one-fifth of patients with DFU have nasal S. aureus, including MRSA, colonization; however, the colonization is significantly associated with S. aureus diabetic foot infection. Screening for S. aureus colonizing status in DFU patients might have a potential clinical implication.

Link between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and infected diabetic foot ulcers

AIMS

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic patients may be a risk factor for diabetic foot lesion infections. The aims of this study were to compare the genotypic profiles of S. aureus strains isolated from nares and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) using microarray technology.

METHODS

Patients were included if they were admitted for diabetic foot infection (DFI) at any of three diabetology departments of Montpellier and Nîmes University Hospitals between 1 September 2010 to 30 June 2012. All S. aureus isolates were analyzed using oligonucleotides arrays; S. aureus resistance and virulence genes were determined and each isolate was affiliated to a clonal complex.

RESULTS

The prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among the 276 included patients was 39.5% (n=109), while 36.6% (n=101) had S. aureus at both sites (nares and foot wounds) and, of these patients, 65.3% of patients harboured the same strain at both sites. In addition, the spread of the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ST398 clone in DFI and its tropism for bone were also further confirmed.

CONCLUSION

These findings appear to provide new arguments in favour of the systematic detection of nasal S. aureus carriage to anticipate the management of DFI.

Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Diabetic Foot Infections in a Large Academic Hospital: Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship

Introduction

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the United States. Antimicrobials active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are recommended in patients with associated risk factors; however, limited data exist to support these recommendations. Due to the changing epidemiology of MRSA, and the consequences of unnecessary antibiotic therapy, guidance regarding the necessity of empirical MRSA coverage in DFIs is needed. We sought to 1) describe the prevalence of MRSA DFIs at our institution and compare to the proportion of patients who receive MRSA antibiotic coverage and 2) identify risk factors for MRSA DFI.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult, culture-positive DFI patients managed at University Hospital, San Antonio, TX between January 1, 2010 and September 1, 2014. Patient eligibility included a principal ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis code for foot infection and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes. The primary outcome was MRSA identified in the wound culture. Independent variables assessed included patient demographics, comorbidities, prior hospitalization, DFI therapies, prior antibiotics, prior MRSA infection, and laboratory values. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for MRSA DFI.

Results

Overall, 318 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly Hispanic (79%) and male (69%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (76%), dyslipidemia (52%), and obesity (49%). S. aureus was present in 46% of culture-positive DFIs (MRSA, 15%). A total of 273 patients (86%) received MRSA antibiotic coverage, resulting in 71% unnecessary use. Male gender (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.37–7.99) and bone involvement (OR 1.93, 1.00–3.78) were found to be independent risk factors for MRSA DFI.

Conclusions

Although MRSA was the causative pathogen in a small number of DFI, antibiotic coverage targeted against MRSA was unnecessarily high.