Can serum level of HBsAg differentiate HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B from inactive carrier state?

Inter-method variability of hepatitis B surface antigen quantification in a cohort of Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Hepatitis B (HB) surface antigen (HBsAg) levels can predict clinical and treatment outcomes in chronic HB virus (HBV) infection. We aimed to compare the performance of two different assays [Elecsys® (Roche) and Architect™ (Abbott)] for HBsAg quantification and evaluate HBsAg levels in the various immune phases in a cohort of Egyptian patients with chronic HBV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Quantitative HBsAg by Elecsys® and Architect™ assays, measurement of routine biochemical and serological markers, and transient elastography were performed in 92 patients with chronic HBV. Results of the two assays and other tests were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-two treatment-naive patients with chronic HBV, (70% males; mean age, 36.1 ± 10.5 years) were recruited from Cairo Fatemic Hospital. Patients were categorized as HBeAg positive (n = 22) and HBeAg negative (n = 70). The Architect™ and Elecsys® assays were significantly correlated (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.913; 95% CI: 0.870-0.943; p < 0.001). However, Deming regression, Passing and Bablok, and Bland-Altman statistical analyses showed discordance among the assays. HBsAg levels by both assays were significantly higher in the HBeAg positive than patients with HBeAg-negative (p = 0.033 and 0.013, respectively). HBsAg levels in the Architect™ and Elecsys® assays were significantly higher in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis than in HBeAg-negative chronic infection (p = 0.002 and 0.004, respectively) CONCLUSION: Both assays for qHBsAg were found to be simple and reproducible tests that could classify patients and provide additional evidence on the natural history of HBV.

The role of quantitative HBsAg in patients with HBV DNA between 2000-20,000 IU/ml

AIMS

We aimed to determine the contribution of quantitative HBsAg in differentiating chronic infections from chronic hepatitis in HBeAg negative patients with HBV DNA 2000-20,000 IU/ml.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 79 untreated HBeAg negative patients were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on HBV DNA levels: group 1 (HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/ml), group 2 (HBV DNA: 2000-20,000 IU/ml) and group 3 (HBV DNA > 20,000 IU/ml). We collected serum from all patients for quantitative HBsAg analysis. We compared serum quantitative HBsAg levels with biochemical parameters, HBV DNA and liver biopsy results.

RESULTS

In this study 46 patients were female and the mean age was 42 years. Serum quantitative HBsAg levels were found to be significantly lower in chronic infections compared with chronic hepatitis. There was a positive correlation between quantitative HBsAg and HBV DNA, ALT (alanine aminotransferase), HAI score (histological activity index), fibrosis score and disease stage. The cut-off level of quantitative HBsAg was determined as 4425 IU/ml to differentiate chronic infection from chronic hepatitis. With the test specificity of 95%, we found quantitative HBsAg cut-off values 1026 IU/ml and 20,346 IU/ml for the diagnosis of chronic infection and chronic hepatitis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the quantitative HBsAg ≤ 1000 IU/ml limit value might be used for the diagnosis of chronic infection not only in HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/ml but also in patients with HBV DNA between 2000-20,000 IU/ml. In addition, antiviral treatment could be considered in patients with quantitative HBsAg > 20,000 IU/ml and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/ml without further examinations such as liver biopsy.

Viral Biomarkers in Chronic HBeAg Negative HBV Infection

Viral biomarkers are important tools for monitoring chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg) negative infection, both in its natural course as well as during and after treatment. The biomarkers consist of antibodies against viral epitopes, viral proteins, and molecular surrogate markers of the quantity and transcriptional activity of the stable episomal HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) which is located in the nuclei of the infected hepatocytes. HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or else viral load measurement in plasma or serum is a marker of HBV replication of major clinical importance. HBV DNA is used for staging and treatment monitoring as described in international scientific guidelines. Quantification of HBV antigens, mainly hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as well as Hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg), play an important yet secondary role, especially in cases of low or undetectable HBV DNA and has been evaluated for the classification of the inactive carrier state, as a predictor of subsequent HBsAg clearance, treatment outcome, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The measurement of the replicative intermediate HBV RNA in serum is currently evaluated and may also prove to be a significant biomarker particularly in patients treated with nucleot(s)ide analogs. This review focuses on the viral biomarkers mentioned above and their role in HBV, HBeAg negative, infection.

Pronounced decline of serum HBsAg in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term effective nucleos(t)ide analogs therapy

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the kinetics of serum HBsAg levels in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective clinical study. Serum HBsAg in serial samples of 94 patients, who received at least 8 years of NAs therapy, were measured using Elecsys^® HBsAg II Quant Assay.

RESULTS

In this cohort, serum HBsAg levels reduced from 3.80 log10 IU/mL at baseline to 2.72 log10 IU/mL at year 8 (p < .001), and the percentage of patients with HBsAg <1000 IU/mL increased from 14.9% at baseline to 55.3% at year 8 (p < .001). The reduction of serum HBsAg did not differ significantly between patients stratified by baseline virological parameters and type of antiviral agents. But as compared to patients without HBeAg seroconversion, HBsAg levels were significant lower in patients with HBeAg seroconversion (3.19 vs. 2.47 log10 IU/mL at year 8, p = .001). As compared to patients with slow (0-1 log10 IU/mL) or steady HBsAg(≤0 log10 IU/mL) decline at year 1, patients with a rapid HBsAg (≥1 log10 IU/mL) decline had a significantly lower HBsAg levels from year 2 to 8. However, Cox regression analysis showed that only absolute HBsAg levels at year 1 was an independent predictor of subsequent HBsAg <1000 IU/mL at year 8 of antiviral therapy(HR 0.242, p = .004).

CONCLUSION

Pronounced HBsAg declines could be achieved in patients after long-term effective therapy with NAs, and on-treatment low serum HBsAg level at year 1 might be a predictor of serum HBsAg <1000 IU/mL at year 8.

Comparative Analysis for Glycopatterns and Complex-Type N-Glycans of Glycoprotein in Sera from Chronic Hepatitis B- and C-Infected Patients

Background: Chronic infection with HBV (CHB) or HCV (CHC) is the most common chronic viral hepatitis that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in humans, their infections have distinct pathogenic processes, however, little is known about the difference of glycoprotein glycopatterns in serum between hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients.

Methods: A method combining the lectin microarrays, letin-mediated affinity capture glycoproteins, and MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS was employed to analyze serum protein glycopatterns and identify the glycan structures from patients with CHB (n = 54) or CHC(n = 47), and healthy volunteers (HV, n = 35). Lectin blotting was further utilized to validate and assess the expression levels of their serum glycopatterns. Finally, the differences of the glycoprotein glycopatterns were systematically compared between CHB and CHC patients.

Conclusions: As a result, there were 11 lectins (e.g., HHL, GSL-II, and EEL) exhibited significantly increased expression levels, and three lectins (LCA, VVA, and ACA) exhibited significantly decreased expression levels of serum protein glycopatterns only in the CHB patients. However, DBA exhibited significantly decreased expression levels, and two lectins (WGA and SNA) exhibited significantly increased expression levels of serum glycopatterns only in the CHC patients. Furthermore, LEL and MAL-I showed a coincidentally increasing trend in both CHC and CHB patients compared with the HV. The individual analysis demonstrated that eight lectins (MPL, GSL-I, PTL-II, UEA-I, WGA, LEL, VVA, and MAL-I) exhibited a high degree of consistency with the pooled serum samples of HV, CHB, and CHC patients. Besides, a complex-type N-glycans binder PHA-E+L exhibited significantly decreased NFIs in the CHB compared with HV and CHC subjects (p < 0.01). The MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS results of N-linked glycans from the serum glycoproteins isolated by PHA-E+L-magnetic particle conjugates showed that there was an overlap of 23 N-glycan peaks (e.g., m/z 1419.743, 1663.734, and 1743.581) between CHB, and CHC patients, 5 glycan peaks (e.g., m/z 1850.878, 1866.661, and 2037.750) were presented in virus-infected hepatitis patients compared with HV, 3 glycan peaks (1460.659, 2069.740, and 2174.772) were observed only in CHC patients. Our data provide useful information to find new biomarkers for distinguishing CHB and CHC patients based on the precision alteration of their serum glycopatterns.