Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents when tested against numerous species of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus causing infection in US hospitals

In vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Against Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria from Patients with Bloodstream Infections Collected as a Part of ATLAS Between 2017 and 2020

Purpose

To assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, β-hemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from blood collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME), Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe, Latin America (LATAM), and North America from 2017 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program.

Methods

Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined using broth microdilution for all antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines.

Results

Ceftaroline showed good activity (susceptibility ≥89.8%, MIC90 0.008-2 mg/L) against all Gram-positive isolates tested. All isolates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, and S. pyogenes were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC90 0.008-0.25 mg/L). Ceftaroline susceptibility for MRSA isolates was 89.8% globally (MIC90 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, except S. epidermis (susceptibility, 99.9%). Among other agents, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline showed potent activity (susceptibility ≥97.9%, MIC90 0.03-2 mg/L) against all isolates tested.

Conclusion

Ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against global bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive bacteria collected between 2017 and 2020. Monitoring and surveillance of global as well as regional longitudinal trends of resistance rates among Gram-positive isolates causing bloodstream infections are important to limit the spread of AMR, establish stewardship measures, and manage and appropriately treat infections.

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Staphylococcus pettenkoferi Bacteremia in an American Intensive Care Unit

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are considered the most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections; yet, these species are frequently designated as contaminants in the absence of systemic signs and symptoms of infection. Immunocompromised patients or those with prosthetic devices are at increased risk for clinically significant bacteremia. With the advent of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in clinical practice, there has been improved specificity of CoNS isolate identification and further elucidation of underrecognized pathogenic species. Staphylococcus pettenkoferi was a novel CoNS species first identified in 2002 and thought to be misdiagnosed as other CoNS due to limitations in biochemical identification. There is increasing identification of S. pettenkoferi isolates; however, there are limited case reports of clinically significant S. pettenkoferi bacteremia and no reported cases within the United States. We present the first known case of S. pettenkoferi from an American intensive care unit.

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus Bloodstream Infections in Humans: a Review

Staphylococci are among the most frequent human microbiota components associated with the high level of bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes. In predisposed patients, there is a high risk of transformation of BSI episodes to sepsis. Both bacterial and host factors are crucial for the outcomes of BSI and sepsis. The highest rates of BSI episodes were reported in Africa, where these infections were up to twice as high as the European rates. However, there remains a great need to analyze African data for comprehensive quantification of staphylococcal BSI prevalence. The lowest rates of BSI exist in Australia. Asian, European, and North American data showed similar frequency values. Worldwide analysis indicated that both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are the most frequent BSI agents. In the second group, the most prevalent species was Staphylococcus epidermidis, although CoNS were not identified at the species level in many studies. The lack of a significant worldwide decrease in BSI episodes indicates a great need to implement standardized diagnostic methods and research etiological factors using advanced genetic methods.

Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have emerged as major pathogens in healthcare-associated facilities, being S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus and, more recently, S. lugdunensis, the most clinically relevant species. Despite being less virulent than the well-studied pathogen S. aureus, the number of CoNS strains sequenced is constantly increasing and, with that, the number of virulence factors identified in those strains. In this regard, biofilm formation is considered the most important. Besides virulence factors, the presence of several antibiotic-resistance genes identified in CoNS is worrisome and makes treatment very challenging. In this review, we analyzed the different aspects involved in CoNS virulence and their impact on health and food.

Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin against clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from the USA and Europe stratified by species

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of dalbavancin compared with vancomycin, daptomycin and other agents against a large collection of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates.

METHODS

A total of 5088 CoNS causing clinically significant infection were consecutively collected from 122 medical centres in the USA and Europe over 6 years (2014-2019). Isolates were tested for susceptibility by the reference broth microdilution method. Species identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF. Most isolates were from bloodstream infections (BSIs) (53.5%) or skin/skin structure infections (28.5%).

RESULTS

Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common species overall (54.6%) and for BSI (61.3%). The second most common species were Staphylococcus lugdunensis overall (12.3%) and Staphylococcus hominis for BSI (14.7%). Dalbavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L) inhibited >99.9% of CoNS isolates at ≤0.25 mg/L (susceptible breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus per CLSI). All species were inhibited at ≤0.25 mg/L dalbavancin, except some S. epidermidis (>99.9%) and Staphylococcus warneri (98.9%) isolates. Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus simulans exhibited the lowest dalbavancin MIC_50/90 values (0.015/0.03 mg/L) and Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus the highest (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L); 47.8% of S. epidermidis and 34.7% of S. haemolyticus exhibited decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC ≥ 2 mg/L) and 23.2% of S. capitis and 28.4% of S. warneri showed decreased susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC ≥ 1 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial susceptibility varied widely among CoNS species. Dalbavancin inhibited >99.9% and 99.1% of isolates at the US-FDA and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. Clinical studies of dalbavancin for treatment of CoNS infections should be considered based on these in vitro data.

Activity of ceftaroline versus ceftobiprole against staphylococci and pneumococci in the UK and Ireland: analysis of BSAC surveillance data

BACKGROUND

Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole inhibit most MRSA and MDR pneumococci. Few direct comparisons of their activity have been published, but in several years (2008, 2013, 2017 and 2018) both were tested in parallel in the BSAC Resistance Surveillance Programme, giving paired results. These are reviewed.

METHODS

Isolates included were bloodstream Staphylococcus aureus [n = 1884 (MRSA, n = 234)], bloodstream CoNS (n = 813; 574 methicillin resistant), and bloodstream (n = 852) and respiratory (n = 670) Streptococcus pneumoniae. MICs were determined by BSAC agar dilution and reviewed against EUCAST breakpoints; S. aureus breakpoints were assumed for CoNS.

RESULTS

Ceftaroline MICs were mostly 2-fold lower than those of ceftobiprole, but, for all groups, MICs of both agents were strongly inter-related. Methicillin-susceptible staphylococci were universally susceptible to both agents; all MRSA were susceptible to ceftobiprole, whereas 10/234 had intermediate/high-dose susceptibility to ceftaroline. Among methicillin-resistant CoNS, 88% were susceptible to both agents, but reduced ceftaroline susceptibility and ceftobiprole resistance were frequent (65%) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. One S. pneumoniae was resistant to both ceftaroline (MIC 0.5 mg/L) and ceftobiprole (MIC 1 mg/L) and seven others were only resistant to ceftobiprole (MIC 1 mg/L); seven of these eight pneumococci belonged to serotype 19A or 19F. No time trend in susceptibility was seen for either cephalosporin.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole have similarly good activity against staphylococci and pneumococci. Therapeutic choices between these agents should be predicated on other differentiating factors, including licensed indications, clinical experience and need for Gram-negative coverage.

Influence of antibiotics on biofilm formation by different clones of nosocomial Staphylococcus haemolyticus

Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the most common organism among clinical isolatesof methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Aim: This study evaluated the ability to produce biofilm with the presence of the antibiotics (1/4 minimum inhibitory concentrations) of S. haemolyticus strains isolated from blood culture. Methods: Clonal distribution was assessed in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. PCR assays were performed to detect mecA, icaA, aap, atlE, atl, fbp genes. S. haemolyticus strains grown in the presence of the antibiotics were investigated for biofilm formation on glass, polystyrene and catheter surfaces. Results: Biofilm formation was independent of the presence of the icaA and mecA genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type. Vancomycin, oxacillin, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid did not inhibit biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the biofilm formation process is complex and may not be related to ica gene carriage. Furthermore, in this study the biofilm formation was increased in the presence of antimicrobial agents.

Contamination of reusable electroencephalography electrodes: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Reusable electroencephalography cup electrodes and lead wires (rEEGs-CELWs) could be a source of microorganisms capable of causing hospital-acquired infections. The purpose of this study was to investigate for bacterial species of cleaned rEEGs-CELWs.

METHODS

This microbiologic evaluation involved 4 epilepsy monitoring units where rEEGs-CELWs were swabbed for bacteria using standard techniques. Analyses involved descriptive statistics and logistic regression (across sites).

RESULTS

Of 124 swabs, 31 (25.0%; range, 13.3%-43.3%) showed positive bacterial cultures, without between-site differences (P = .17). Bacteria were labeled by risk for hospital-acquired infection: no risk, potential risk (primarily in immunocompromised patients), and at risk (associated with infections and antibiotic resistance). At-risk bacteria species were Staphylococcus epidermidis (38.7%), Staphylococcus capitis subsp ureolyticus (3.2%), and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (9.6%). Potential-risk species were Micrococcus spp (22.6%), Acinetobacter lwoffii (6.5%), Staphylococcus hominis subsp hominis (6.5%), and Staphylococcus warneri (6.5%). Bacillus (9.6%) was the only no-risk species. Of 18 antibiotics tested on positive cultures, resistant bacteria were found in a median of 1 (range, 0-11) positive culture, equating to a 6.7% (range, 0%-61.1%) resistant antibiotic rate; no microorganisms were resistant to all antibiotics tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacteria that were potential risk or at risk for infection were found on 22.6% of cleaned rEEGs-CELWs. Use of single-use electrodes and research on scalp infection and infection reduction interventions are warranted.

In vitro activity of novel anti-MRSA cephalosporins and comparator antimicrobial agents against staphylococci involved in prosthetic joint infections

OBJECTIVES

Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are new parenteral cephalosporins with potent activity against methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci, which are the leading cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The aim of this study was to determine and compare the in vitro activities of both molecules against staphylococcal isolates recovered from clinically documented PJIs.

METHODS

A collection of 200 non-duplicate clinical isolates [100 Staphylococcus aureus and 100 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), including 19 and 27 MR isolates, respectively] was studied. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of oxacillin, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, vancomycin, teicoplanin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, linezolid and daptomycin were determined by the broth microdilution method. Bactericidal activity (at 4× MIC) of ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin was assessed by time-kill assay.

RESULTS

Among the S. aureus isolates, 100% were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5μg/mL) and 98% were susceptible to ceftobiprole (MIC50/90, 0.5/1μg/mL), regardless of their methicillin resistance. The two ceftobiprole-non-susceptible strains (including one MRSA) showed MICs at 4mg/L. Against CoNS isolates, ceftaroline and ceftobiprole exhibited in vitro potency with MIC50/90 values at 0.06/0.25μg/mL and 0.25/1μg/mL, respectively. At 4× MIC, ceftaroline and ceftobiprole showed rapid and marked bactericidal activity against both S. aureus and CoNS (after 24/12h and 12/6h of incubation, respectively), whilst none of the other molecules tested had a bactericidal effect by 24h.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that ceftaroline and ceftobiprole have excellent in vitro activity against clinical isolates of staphylococci involved in PJIs. These molecules may therefore represent promising alternatives for the treatment of such infections.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from cancer patients

Bacterial infections are common in cancer patients. Ceftaroline (CFT) is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against most Gram-positive organisms (GPOs) and many Gram-negative organisms. In this study, the in vitro activity of CFT was compared with vancomycin (VAN), daptomycin (DAP), linezolid (LZD), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (SXT) and tigecycline (TIG) against bacteria (predominantly blood culture isolates) isolated from cancer patients in 2014 and 2015. CFT was active against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (MS-CoNS) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) with MIC90 values (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibited 90% of the isolates) of 0.25, 2.0, 0.12 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. MIC90 values for other GPOs were: Bacillus spp., >8.0 mg/L; Corynebacterium spp., 2.0 mg/L; Micrococcus spp., <0.06 mg/L; viridans group streptococci, 0.5 mg/L; Streptococcus pneumoniae, 0.25 mg/L; and Streptococcus spp., <0.06 mg/L. Among the comparator agents, VAN, DAP, TIG and LZD were active against the majority of GPOs tested. CFT also had moderate activity against common extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-negative Gram-negative bacilli such as Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis and Serratia spp.

First Draft Genome Sequence of Staphylococcus condimenti F-2T

This report describes the draft genome sequence of S. condimenti strain F-2^T (DSM 11674), a potential starter culture. The genome assembly comprised 2,616,174 bp with 34.6% GC content. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documentation that reports the whole-genome sequence of S. condimenti.