In vitro activity of Ceftaroline against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in African and Middle Eastern countries: AWARE global surveillance program 2012-2014

In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline and Comparators against Bacterial Isolates Collected Globally from Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: ATLAS Program 2019-2020

The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) collected in Africa/Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America from 2019-2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria. All the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Across all regions, ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, susceptibility 89.5-93.7%) isolates. Susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and tigecycline was ≥94.1% in MSSA and MRSA isolates. Against β-hemolytic streptococci isolates, ceftaroline demonstrated very potent activity (MIC90 0.008-0.03 mg/L) across all regions. All β-hemolytic streptococci isolates were susceptible to linezolid, penicillin, and vancomycin (MIC90 0.06-2 mg/L). Among the extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-negative Enterobacterales tested (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and K. oxytoca), susceptibility to ceftaroline was high (88.2-98.6%) in all regions. All ESBL-negative Enterobacterales were susceptible to aztreonam. Potent activity was observed for amikacin, cefepime, and meropenem (94.1-100%) against these isolates. Overall, ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against isolates of pathogens causing SSTIs. Continuous surveillance of global and regional susceptibility patterns is needed to guide appropriate treatment options against these pathogens.

Clinical evidence supporting ceftaroline fosamil and ceftobiprole for complicated skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are advanced generation cephalosporins with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This review summarizes their clinical efficacy for complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Both these agents retain excellent in vitro activity against both MRSA and Gram-negative isolates from patients with CSSTIs. Both these agents are registered for the management of cSSTIs based on the results of large scale phase III noninferiority trials. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are noninferior to the combination of vancomycin and aztreonam as this was assessed by their clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visits. Furthermore, ceftobiprole is noninferior to comparators for the achievement of early clinical success at 72 h. Ceftaroline achieves 81% clinical cure against diabetic foot infections.

SUMMARY

Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole can be used as monotherapy for the treatment of cSSTIs.

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates from paediatric patients in Kuwait: ATLAS data 2012-19

OBJECTIVES

To report antimicrobial resistance data for Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated from paediatric patients in three hospitals in Kuwait during 2012-19.

METHODS

In vitro activity of antimicrobials against isolates from documented infections was determined using CLSI broth microdilution method and breakpoints at a central laboratory. Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were screened for β-lactamases using multiplex PCR assays. Phenotypic determination of resistance in Haemophilus influenzae and Gram-positive isolates was performed using standard methodologies.

RESULTS

Among 515 Enterobacterales isolates, 29.3% were ESBL-positive; susceptibility was highest to amikacin, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem (≥97.4%), regardless of ESBL status. CTX-M-15 was identified in 87.1% of ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and 84.2% of ESBL-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Of 111 P. aeruginosa isolates, 9.9% were MDR and 12.6% meropenem-resistant (MEM-R). Amikacin and ceftazidime/avibactam had the highest susceptibility rates in the overall group (≥92.8%), with reduced rates among MDR and MEM-R isolates. All 269 MRSA and 180 MSSA isolates were susceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, tigecycline and vancomycin. All MSSA and 99.3% of MRSA were ceftaroline susceptible. All 168 pneumococcal isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin. H. influenzae and Streptococcus pyogenes ceftaroline susceptibility rates were ≥93.3% and ≥95.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most isolates of Enterobacterales (including resistant phenotypes) and P. aeruginosa from Kuwait during 2012-19 were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Ceftaroline was active against most Gram-positive isolates, including resistant phenotypes, and ESBL-negative Enterobacterales. These results indicate that novel antibiotics such as ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline represent valuable treatment options for paediatric infections, including those caused by MDR organisms.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline and comparators against bacterial isolates collected globally from patients with skin infections

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the antimicrobial activities of ceftaroline and comparators against bacterial isolates from patients with skin and skin-structure infections (2015-2018).

METHODS

A central laboratory performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to CLSI broth microdilution methodology. EUCAST breakpoints were used.

RESULTS

Isolates were collected in Europe (14 408 isolates; 53.9%), Asia/South Pacific (SP) (5317; 19.9%), Latin America (4268; 16.0%) and Africa/Middle East (ME) (2753; 10.3%). In all regions, all 7950 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline and vancomycin; susceptibility to daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin and tigecycline was ≥99.6%. Susceptibility of all 9174 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates to daptomycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, tigecycline and vancomycin was ≥97.7%, with 90.8-96.5% susceptible to ceftaroline. The ceftaroline MIC90 was 0.008 mg/L against Streptococcus pyogenes, 0.015-0.03 mg/L against Streptococcus agalactiae and 0.008-0.015 mg/L against Streptococcus dysgalactiae. All β-haemolytic streptococci were susceptible to vancomycin. Susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-negative Escherichia coli to ceftaroline ranged from 67.0% in Asia/SP to 91.0% in Africa/ME; susceptibility to amikacin, meropenem and tigecycline was ≥96.7% in all regions. Susceptibility of ESBL-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline ranged from 78.4% in Europe to 83.2% in Africa/ME, and among ESBL-negative Klebsiella oxytoca was 76.3% in Asia/SP and 89.0-93.5% in other regions. Among ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae and ESBL-negative K. oxytoca, susceptibility was highest to amikacin (93.7-96.4% and 95.7-100%, respectively) and meropenem (89.7-97.4% and 98.3-100%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ceftaroline was active against the Gram-positive isolates collected. Susceptibility of ESBL-negative Gram-negative isolates showed regional variations.

In vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against clinically important Gram-positive cocci, Haemophilus species and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Ceftaroline, with a unique activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was not launched in Taiwan before 2019. The in vitro susceptibility data of ceftaroline against important Taiwanese pathogens are lacking.

METHODS

The in vitro susceptibility of ceftaroline against important pathogens collected from 2012 through 2018 were extracted from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftaroline against all isolates.

RESULTS

During the study period, the in vitro data regarding isolates of S. aureus (n = 2049), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 185), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 334), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 170), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 75), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 10) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 680) regardless of hospital sites of collection were analyzed. Among the S. aureus isolates studied, 19.4% showed MICs of 1 mg/L to ceftaroline, and 4.4% showed in vitro susceptible-dose dependent to ceftaroline (all MICs, 2 mg/L). Most of other Gram-positive cocci, all H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. By contrast, about one-third (35.9%) of K. pneumoniae isolates, irrespective of infection sources, exhibited non-susceptibility to ceftaroline (MIC range, 0.015-256 mg/L; MIC50 and MIC90 values, 0.12 and 256 mg/L, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

From the pharmacodynamic perspectives, the ceftaroline dosage of 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is effective against all S. aureus and other Gram-positive isolates regardless of acquisition sites in Taiwan. Before ceftaroline is prescribed in treatment of the patient with Gram-negative infection, a cautious evaluation about patient's healthcare-associated factor is warranted.

The use of extrapolation based on modeling and simulation to support high-dose regimens of ceftaroline fosamil in pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections

A model-informed drug development approach was used to select ceftaroline fosamil high-dose regimens for pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with a ceftaroline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 or 4 mg/L. Steady-state ceftaroline concentrations were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline including data from 304 pediatric subjects and 944 adults. Probability of target attainment (PTA) for various simulated pediatric high-dose regimens and renal function categories were calculated based on patients achieving 35% fT>MIC (S. aureus PK/pharmacodynamic target for 2-log10 bacterial killing). For extrapolation of efficacy, simulated exposures and PTA were compared to adults with normal renal function receiving high-dose ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg 2-h infusions every 8 h). For safety, predicted ceftaroline exposures were compared with observed pediatric and adult data. Predicted ceftaroline exposures for the approved pediatric high-dose regimens (12, 10, or 8 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged >2 to <18 years with normal/mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively; 10 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged ≥2 months to <2 years with normal renal function/mild impairment) were well matched to adults with normal renal function. Median predicted maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady state pediatric to adult ratios were 0.907-1.33 and 0.940-1.41, respectively. PTAs (>99% and ≥81% for MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively) matched or exceeded the adult predictions. Simulated Cmax,ss values were below the maximum observed data in other indications, including a high-dose pediatric pneumonia trial, which reported no adverse events related to high exposure.

Comparing probability of target attainment against Staphylococcus aureus for ceftaroline fosamil, vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and ceftriaxone in complicated skin and soft tissue infection using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models

For recently licensed antibiotics, such as the cephalosporin ceftaroline fosamil, probability of target attainment (PTA) curves, showing the percentage of patients reaching a predefined pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target at different bacterial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), have been used to support and justify dose recommendations across patient populations. However, information on PTA for older antibiotics is limited. A retrospective analysis was conducted to construct PTA curves for 4 antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). PK models for vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftriaxone were selected from the literature based on large numbers of subjects with covariates representative of patients in Europe and/or the United States. An existing model was available for ceftaroline fosamil. Standard and high-dosage regimens were used to compare the PTA of each antibiotic at MIC values 0.03 to 64 mg/L for a simulated set of patients with cSSTI caused by S. aureus. These were compared to proportions of S. aureus isolates at each MIC from global surveillance data. Ceftaroline achieved PTAs >99.9% for bacteriostatic and bactericidal targets at the MIC90 (1 mg/L), whereas the comparators failed to achieve PTAs >90%, at bacteriostatic or bactericidal targets, even when clinical doses were increased beyond those recommended. PTA analysis can be used to compare different drugs with the same simulated patient dataset, subject to availability of an appropriate PK model and robust exposure targets. This analysis shows that some antibiotics commonly used to treat cSSTIs may fail to reach high PTAs relative to contemporary MIC90 estimates.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in the Middle East and Africa: AWARE global surveillance programme 2015-2018

OBJECTIVES

To report antimicrobial susceptibility testing surveillance data for ceftaroline and comparative agents from the AWARE global surveillance programme for bacterial pathogens causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and lower respiratory infections (RTIs) in Middle East and African countries from 2015 to 2018.

METHODS

Pathogens were identified by MALDI-TOF/MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. MICs were interpreted by both CLSI (M100, 2020) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (v 10.0, 2020) breakpoints.

RESULTS

All MSSA (n = 1125) and 93.9% of MRSA (n = 1235) were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC ≤ 1 μg/mL, CLSI and EUCAST). The maximum ceftaroline MIC observed for MRSA was 2 μg/mL; no ceftaroline-resistant MRSA were identified among SSTI (CLSI and EUCAST) and RTI (CLSI) isolates. All isolates of β-haemolytic Streptococcus (n = 324), and penicillin-susceptible (PSSP) and -intermediate Streptococcus pneumoniae (PISP; n = 369) were susceptible to ceftaroline. Rates of susceptibility to ceftaroline for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (penicillin MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL; n = 175), and β-lactamase-negative (BLNHI; n = 224) and β-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae (n = 49) were 99.4%, 98.7%, and 98.0% (CLSI) and 92.6%, 98.2%, and 83.7% (EUCAST), respectively. Rates of susceptibility to ceftaroline for ESBL-negative Escherichia coli (n = 442), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 381), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 103) were 92.1%, 93.2%, and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ceftaroline-resistant isolates of MRSA causing SSTIs were not identified in Middle East and African countries in 2015-2018 using recently revised CLSI (in 2019) or EUCAST (in 2018) breakpoint criteria. Common bacterial pathogens causing SSTIs (Staphylococcus aureus, β-haemolytic Streptococcus) and lower RTIs (PSSP, PISP, BLNHI) demonstrated no resistance or low levels of resistance (0-1.8%) to ceftaroline.

Global trends of antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam: a surveillance study from the ATLAS program (2012-2016)

BACKGROUND

This study reports the global trends of antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam using data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program between 2012 and 2016.

METHODS

For the 2012-2016 ATLAS program, 205 medical centers located in Africa-Middle East (n = 12), Asia-Pacific (n = 32), Europe (n = 94), Latin America (n = 26), North America (n = 31), and Oceania (n = 10) consecutively collected the clinical isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and in vitro susceptibilities to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam were assessed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2019and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2019 guidelines.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2016, 176,345 isolates were collected from around the globe and included in the analysis. Regarding Gram-negative bacteria, ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated high susceptibility (> 90%) against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with increased antimicrobial activity observed from the addition of avibactam (4 mg/L) to ceftazidime. Regarding Gram-positive bacteria, ceftaroline showed > 90% susceptibility against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, α-and β-hemolytic Streptococcus. The antimicrobial susceptibilities to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam were mostly stable from 2012 to 2016, but the susceptibilities to ceftazidime-avibactam to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumonia (88.4-81.6%) and to CR-P. aeruginosa (89.6-72.7%) decreased over time. In terms of regional difference, the susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant S. aureus to ceftaroline in Asia and of CR-K. pneumonia to ceftazidime-avibactam in Asia/Africa-Middle East were lower compared with other regions, while the susceptibility of CR-P. aeruginosa to ceftazidime-avibactam in North America was higher.

CONCLUSION

The addition of avibactam improves the activity of ceftazidime against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. The global antimicrobial susceptibilities to ceftaroline and ceftazidime-avibactam were, in general, stable from 2012 to 2016, but a marked reduction in the susceptibilities of specific species and CR-P. aeruginosa to ceftazidime-avibactam was observed.

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline in Taiwan: Results from Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) in 2012-2018 and Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2018-2019

Data on ceftaroline (CPT) susceptibility amongst clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, n=1284) and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (non-ESBL-P) Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=466), obtained from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme from 2012 to 2018, and selected MRSA isolates from patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) (n=95) from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) programme from 2018 to 2019 were analysed. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ATLAS isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method, whereas the MICs of SMART BSI-MRSA isolates were determined using the Etest and MicroScan system. The pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacodynamic parameters of CPT were applied to explore the optimal dosage against infections caused by Taiwanese MRSA and K. pneumoniae isolates. Approximately 7.1% of ATLAS MRSA isolates were susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD) to CPT, and 19.7% of the non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae isolates were not susceptible to CPT. Amongst the ATLAS MRSA isolates, the S-DD rates to CPT amongst isolates causing lower respiratory tract infections were 11.9% and 8.5% for isolates from intensive care units (ICUs) and general wards (GWs), and those causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were 20% and 5.3% for isolates from ICUs and GWs, respectively (P=0.015). Of the SSTI MRSA isolates from GWs, 22.7% displayed vancomycin MICs >1 mg/L. Amongst 95 SMART BSI MRSA isolates, 28 (46.7%) isolates exhibited lower CPT MICs by the Etest compared with 60 isolates with CPT MICs of 1-2 mg/L by the MicroScan system. CPT 600 mg as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h is suggested for treatment of infections caused by MRSA and phenotypic non-ESBL-P K. pneumoniae in Taiwan.

Activity of ceftaroline against pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia collected as part of the AWARE surveillance program, 2015-2016

We report Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) program data for ceftaroline and comparators against isolates collected from identified lower respiratory tract sources in 2015 and 2016. MICs and susceptibility were determined using CLSI broth microdilution methodology and EUCAST breakpoints. Ceftaroline susceptibility among penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC≥4 mg/L [nonmeningitis breakpoint]) ranged from 77.4% (Asia, 72/93) to 100% (Oceania, 16/16; Latin America, 15/15). Among MRSA, ceftaroline susceptibility ranged from 72.3% (Asia, 553/765) to 100% (Oceania, 39/39). Among β-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae, ceftaroline susceptibility ranged from 69.2% (Asia, 36/52) to 100% (Oceania, 19/19). Susceptibility to ceftaroline against non-ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was between 91.4% (Europe, 659/721) and 100% (Oceania, 55/55) and for Escherichia coli between 85.7% (Africa/Middle East, 42/49) and 92.1% (Oceania, 35/38). Ceftaroline is not active against ESBL producers. In this study, susceptibility to ceftaroline was high among the S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, β-lactamase-negative H. influenzae, and ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae and E. coli collected.

Impact of EUCAST ceftaroline breakpoint change on the susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections

OBJECTIVES

In 2018, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) introduced an intermediate breakpoint for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus. The objective of this study was to compare data on resistance to ceftaroline among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates using versions 7.1 (March 2017) and 8.0 (January 2018) of the EUCAST breakpoints.

METHODS

Participating centers were located in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and South America. Isolates were collected from patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections and were cultured from integumentary sources. Methicillin resistance among S. aureus was confirmed locally using the oxacillin method. The CLSI broth microdilution method was used to measure ceftaroline MICs at the central laboratory. Versions 7.1 and 8.0 of the EUCAST breakpoints were used to interpret MIC data.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2016, 9559 isolates of S. aureus were collected, of which 5566 (58.2%) isolates were MRSA. Overall, the lowest rate of MRSA was in Asia (56.5%; 705/1247) and the highest rate was in Oceania (62.7%; 299/477). Using version 7.1 of the EUCAST breakpoints, 4.5% (250/5566) of all MRSA isolates were resistant to ceftaroline and when version 8.0 of the breakpoints was applied, 4.2% (235/5566) of MRSA were in the intermediate category and 0.3% (15/5566) of all isolates were considered resistant.

CONCLUSIONS

By applying version 8.0 of the EUCAST breakpoints, the majority of MRSA isolates that were resistant are now in the intermediate category for ceftaroline. Ceftaroline resistance among MRSA now appears rare.

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftaroline with those of ceftriaxone for treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until April 2019. This meta-analysis only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated ceftaroline and ceftriaxone for the treatment of CAP. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, and the secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events (AEs). Five RCTs were included. Overall, at the test of cure (TOC), the clinical cure rate of ceftaroline was superior to the rates of ceftriaxone for the treatment of CAP (modified intent-to-treat population (MITT) population, odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31–1.99, I² = 0%; clinically evaluable (CE) population, OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07–1.78, I² = 14%). Similarly, the clinical cure rate of ceftaroline was superior to that of ceftriaxone at the end of therapy (EOT) (MITT population, OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.16–2.11, I² = 0%; CE population, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15–2.33, I² = 0%). For adult patients, the clinical cure rate of ceftaroline remained superior to that of ceftriaxone at TOC (MITT population, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.34–2.06, I² = 0%; CE population, OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.08–1.80, I² = 30%) and at EOT (MITT population, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.24, I² = 0%; CE population, OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.15–2.36, I² = 0%). Ceftaroline and ceftriaxone did not differ significantly in the risk of serious AEs, treatment-emergent AEs, and discontinuation of the study drug owing to an AE. In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of ceftaroline is similar to that of ceftriaxone for the treatment of CAP. Furthermore, this antibiotic is as tolerable as ceftriaxone.

Analysis of Potential β-Lactam Surrogates To Predict In Vitro Susceptibility and Resistance to Ceftaroline for Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae

Ceftaroline fosamil was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2010 and by the European Medicines Agency in 2012. As of April 2017, only one commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing device offered a Gram-negative panel that included ceftaroline. This circumstance is unfortunate, as many clinical microbiology laboratories rely solely on commercial devices to generate in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for common bacterial pathogens. In lieu of device-based testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, laboratories wishing to test ceftaroline must either opt for disk diffusion testing or use a gradient strip; however, both alternatives interrupt laboratory workflow and require additional labor and expense. Identification of a reliable surrogate β-lactam to predict in vitro susceptibility to ceftaroline may offer another interim solution as laboratories await availability of ceftaroline for testing on their commercial devices. We tested six β-lactams (aztreonam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, and cefpodoxime) as potential surrogates for ceftaroline against a collection of 543 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae selected to approximate the distribution of ceftaroline MICs observed in AWARE global surveillance studies conducted in 2013. All six potential surrogates generated very major error rates of 16.3% to 56.6%, far exceeding the accepted limit of 1.5% set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Failure to identify a reliable surrogate to predict in vitro susceptibility and resistance to ceftaroline for clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae underscores the need for expedited addition of newer antimicrobial agents to commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices.

Recent advances on topical antimicrobials for skin and soft tissue infections and their safety concerns

Antimicrobial resistance of disease-related microorganisms is considered a worldwide prevalent and serious issue which increases the failure of treatment outcomes and leads to high mortality. Considering that the increased resistance to systemic antimicrobial therapy often needs of the use of more toxic agents, topical antimicrobial therapy emerges as an attractive route for the treatment of infectious diseases. The topical antimicrobial therapy is based on the absorption of high drug doses in a readily accessible skin surface, resulting in a reduction of microbial proliferation at infected skin sites. Topical antimicrobials retain the following features: (a) they are able to escape the enzymatic degradation and rapid clearance in the gastrointestinal tract or the first-pass metabolism during oral administration; (b) alleviate the physical discomfort related to intravenous injection; (c) reduce possible adverse effects and drug interactions of systemic administrations; (d) increase patient compliance and convenience; and (e) reduce the treatment costs. Novel antimicrobials for topical application have been widely exploited to control the emergence of drug-resistant microorganisms. This review provides a description of antimicrobial resistance, common microorganisms causing skin and soft tissue infections, topical delivery route of antimicrobials, safety concerns of topical antimicrobials, recent advances, challenges and future prospective in topical antimicrobial development.

The role of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a major public health issue worldwide over the last years. MRSA is frequently implicated in the development of skin and soft tissue infections, leading to significant increases in morbidity, mortality and overall healthcare costs.

RECENT FINDINGS

In order to face the threat of MRSA, major changes in clinical management of skin and soft tissue infections are required. The identification of populations at risk for the acquisition of infections due to MRSA, together with the improvement of the diagnostic techniques, is paramount. Moreover, a number of new antimicrobials with activity against MRSA have been recently developed and approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, however, the use of the new drugs in the wide clinical practice remains limited.

SUMMARY

We reviewed the current epidemiology of MRSA in skin and soft tissue infections, with particular focus on implications for clinical management. The potential role of new antibiotic options against MRSA infections is also discussed.

Dosing strategies to optimize currently available anti-MRSA treatment options (Part 1: IV options)

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be a predominant pathogen resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal dosing of anti-MRSA agents is needed to help prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance and to increase the likelihood of a favorable clinical outcome. Areas covered: This review summarizes the available data for antimicrobials routinely used for MRSA infections that are not administered orally or topically. We make recommendations and highlight the current gaps in the literature. A PubMed (1966 - Present) search was performed to identify relevant literature for this review. Expert commentary: Improvements in MIC determination and therapeutic drug monitoring are needed to fully implement individualized dosing that optimizes antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Additional data will become available for these agents in regards to effectiveness for severe MRSA infections and pharmacokinetic data for special patient populations.