Dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, including adjustments for renal impairment, for Phase IIa and Phase III evaluation

PURPOSE

A series of iterative population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses based on emerging data supported dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, an investigational combination antibiotic for serious Gram-negative bacterial infections.

METHODS

Two iterations of PK models built from avibactam data in infected patients and aztreonam data in healthy subjects with "patient-like" assumptions were used in joint PTA analyses (primary target: aztreonam 60% fT > 8 mg/L, avibactam 50% fT > 2.5 mg/L) exploring patient variability, infusion durations, and adjustments for moderate (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCL] > 30 to ≤ 50 mL/min) and severe renal impairment (> 15 to ≤ 30 mL/min). Achievement of > 90% joint PTA and the impact of differential renal clearance were considerations in dose selection.

RESULTS

Iteration 1 simulations for Phase I/IIa dose selection/modification demonstrated that 3-h and continuous infusions provide comparable PTA; avibactam dose drives joint PTA within clinically relevant exposure targets; and loading doses support more rapid joint target attainment. An aztreonam/avibactam 500/137 mg 30-min loading dose and 1500/410 mg 3-h maintenance infusions q6h were selected for further evaluation. Iteration 2 simulations using expanded PK models supported an alteration to the regimen (500/167 mg loading; 1500/500 mg q6h maintenance 3-h infusions for CrCL > 50 mL/min) and selection of doses for renal impairment for Phase IIa/III clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose plus 3-h maintenance infusions of aztreonam-avibactam in a 3:1 fixed ratio q6h optimizes joint PTA. These analyses supported dose selection for the aztreonam-avibactam Phase III clinical program.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01689207; NCT02655419; NCT03329092; NCT03580044.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Pediatric Patients Aged 3 Months and Older

Increasing prevalence of infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative bacteria represents a global health crisis, and while several novel therapies that target various aspects of antimicrobial resistance have been introduced in recent years, few are currently approved for children. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination approved for adults and children 3 months and older with complicated intra-abdominal infection, and complicated urinary tract infection or hospital-acquired ventilator-associated pneumonia (adults only in the United States) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria. Extensive population pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets for ceftazidime and avibactam obtained during the adult clinical development program were used to iteratively select, modify, and validate the approved adult dosage regimen (2,000-500 mg by 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours (q8h), with adjustments for renal function). Following the completion of one phase I (NCT01893346) and two phase II ceftazidime-avibactam studies (NCT02475733 and NCT02497781) in children, adult PK data sets were updated with pediatric PK data. This paper describes the development of updated combined adult and pediatric population PK models and their application in characterizing the population PK of ceftazidime and avibactam in children, and in dose selection for further pediatric evaluation. The updated models supported the approval of ceftazidime-avibactam pediatric dosage regimens (all by 2-hour IV infusion) of 50-12.5 mg/kg (maximum 2,000-500 mg) q8h for those ≥6 months to 18 years old, and 40-10 mg/kg q8h for those ≥3 to 6 months old with creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 .

Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: results from the REJUVENATE study

Objectives

To investigate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety (primary objectives) and efficacy (secondary objective) of the investigational monobactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aztreonam/avibactam in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI).

Methods

This Phase 2a open-label, multicentre study (NCT02655419; EudraCT 2015-002726-39) enrolled adults with cIAI into sequential cohorts for 5–14 days treatment. Cohort 1 patients received an aztreonam/avibactam loading dose of 500/137 mg (30 min infusion), followed by maintenance doses of 1500/410 mg (3 h infusions) q6h; Cohort 2 received 500/167 mg (30 min infusion), followed by 1500/500 mg (3 h infusions) q6h. Cohort 3 was an extension of exposure at the higher dose regimen. Doses were adjusted for creatinine clearance of 31–50 mL/min (Cohorts 2 + 3). All patients received IV metronidazole 500 mg q8h. PK, safety and efficacy were assessed.

Results

Thirty-four patients (Cohort 1, n = 16; Cohorts 2 + 3, n = 18) comprised the modified ITT (MITT) population. Mean exposures of aztreonam and avibactam in Cohorts 2 + 3 were consistent with those predicted to achieve joint PK/pharmacodynamic target attainment in >90% patients. Adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts. The most common AEs were hepatic enzyme increases [n = 9 (26.5%)] and diarrhoea [n = 5 (14.7%)]. Clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit overall were 20/34 (58.8%) (MITT) and 14/23 (60.9%) (microbiological-MITT population).

Conclusions

Observed AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of aztreonam monotherapy, with no new safety concerns identified. These data support selection of the aztreonam/avibactam 500/167 mg (30 min infusion) loading dose and 1500/500 mg (3 h infusions) maintenance dose q6h regimen, in patients with creatinine clearance >50 mL/min, for the Phase 3 development programme.

The use of extrapolation based on modeling and simulation to support high-dose regimens of ceftaroline fosamil in pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections

A model-informed drug development approach was used to select ceftaroline fosamil high-dose regimens for pediatric patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus with a ceftaroline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 or 4 mg/L. Steady-state ceftaroline concentrations were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline including data from 304 pediatric subjects and 944 adults. Probability of target attainment (PTA) for various simulated pediatric high-dose regimens and renal function categories were calculated based on patients achieving 35% fT>MIC (S. aureus PK/pharmacodynamic target for 2-log10 bacterial killing). For extrapolation of efficacy, simulated exposures and PTA were compared to adults with normal renal function receiving high-dose ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg 2-h infusions every 8 h). For safety, predicted ceftaroline exposures were compared with observed pediatric and adult data. Predicted ceftaroline exposures for the approved pediatric high-dose regimens (12, 10, or 8 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged >2 to <18 years with normal/mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, respectively; 10 mg/kg by 2-h infusions every 8 h for patients aged ≥2 months to <2 years with normal renal function/mild impairment) were well matched to adults with normal renal function. Median predicted maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady state pediatric to adult ratios were 0.907-1.33 and 0.940-1.41, respectively. PTAs (>99% and ≥81% for MICs of 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively) matched or exceeded the adult predictions. Simulated Cmax,ss values were below the maximum observed data in other indications, including a high-dose pediatric pneumonia trial, which reported no adverse events related to high exposure.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Adult and Pediatric Patients Following Administration of Ceftaroline Fosamil as a 5-Minute Infusion

The key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) efficacy index for β-lactam antibiotics is the percentage of time that free drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria during each dosing interval (fT>MIC). Ceftaroline fosamil, the prodrug of the β-lactam ceftaroline, was initially approved for administration as 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusions. Population PK analyses comparing exposure and PK/PD target attainment for 5-minute and 60-minute IV infusions, described here, have supported ceftaroline fosamil labeling updates to include variable infusion durations of 5 to 60 minutes in adults and children aged ≥2 months. A 2-compartment disposition PK model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline was used to predict steady-state ceftaroline exposures (maximum plasma concentrations [Cmax,ss ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours [AUCss,0-24 ]) and probability of target attainment in simulated adult and pediatric patients with various degrees of renal function receiving standard doses of ceftaroline fosamil as 5-minute or 60-minute IV infusions. Across age groups and renal function categories, median ceftaroline AUCss,0-24 values were similar for 5-minute and 60-minute infusions, whereas Cmax,ss was up to 42% higher for 5-minute infusions. Both infusion durations achieved >99% probability of target attainment based on PK/PD targets for Staphylococcus aureus (35% fT>MIC) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (44% fT>MIC) at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute MIC breakpoints (1 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L, respectively). These findings support administration of standard ceftaroline fosamil doses over 5 to 60 minutes for adults and children aged ≥2 months, providing added flexibility to clinicians and patients.

Pilot Study of Hyperpolarized 13C Metabolic Imaging in Pediatric Patients with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma and Other CNS Cancers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pediatric CNS tumors commonly present challenges for radiographic interpretation on conventional MR imaging. This study sought to investigate the safety and tolerability of hyperpolarized carbon-13 (HP-¹³C) metabolic imaging in pediatric patients with brain tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pediatric patients 3 to 18 years of age who were previously diagnosed with a brain tumor and could undergo MR imaging without sedation were eligible to enroll in this safety study of HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate. Participants received a one-time injection of HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate and were imaged using dynamic HP-¹³C MR imaging. We assessed 2 dose levels: 0.34 mL/kg and the highest tolerated adult dose of 0.43 mL/kg. Participants were monitored throughout imaging and for 60 minutes postinjection, including pre- and postinjection electrocardiograms and vital sign measurements.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and July 2019, ten participants (9 males; median age, 14 years; range, 10-17 years) were enrolled, of whom 6 completed injection of HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate and dynamic HP-¹³C MR imaging. Four participants failed to undergo HP-¹³C MR imaging due to technical failures related to generating HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate or MR imaging operability. HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate was well-tolerated in all participants who completed the study, with no dose-limiting toxicities or adverse events observed at either 0.34 (n = 3) or 0.43 (n = 3) mL/kg. HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate demonstrated characteristic conversion to [1-¹³C]lactate and [¹³C]bicarbonate in the brain. Due to poor accrual, the study was closed after only 3 participants were enrolled at the highest dose level.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic HP-¹³C MR imaging was safely performed in 6 pediatric patients with CNS tumors and demonstrated HP [1-¹³C]pyruvate brain metabolism.

Population Analysis of Anidulafungin in Infants to Older Adults With Confirmed or Suspected Invasive Candidiasis

In a pooled population analysis, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of i.v. anidulafungin in four studies across a full range of adult and pediatric ages in patients with confirmed, suspected, or at high risk of invasive candidiasis (IC). Relationships between anidulafungin exposure and key efficacy end points (global response of success and all‐cause mortality) and safety end points (all‐cause hepatic or gastrointestinal adverse events) in all patients and separately in pediatric patients and the appropriate dosing regimen for IC treatment in pediatric patients were evaluated. Pediatric patients received a 3.0 mg/kg (maximum 200 mg) i.v. loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg (maximum 100 mg) daily thereafter. Adults received a 200 mg i.v. loading dose and 100 mg daily thereafter. Estimated systemic anidulafungin exposures were similar across age groups (neonates to adults) at the weight‐based doses studied in pediatric patients. No clear associations were identified between anidulafungin exposure and efficacy or safety end points.

1567. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Adult and Pediatric Patients following Administration of Ceftaroline Fosamil as a 5-Minute Infusion

Background

Ceftaroline fosamil is approved in the United States for treating patients ≥2 months old with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and for similar indications in Europe. The active metabolite, ceftaroline, has in vitro activity against common Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling and simulation were used to assess systemic exposure and PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment for S. aureus and S pneumoniae for 5- and 60-minute infusions.

Methods

A simultaneous popPK model, including 2 compartments each, for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline was previously developed using an extensive database of adult and pediatric data. An effect of renal function maturation as a function of postmenstrual age was included on ceftaroline clearance for children <2 years. This model was used to conduct simulations for-approved ceftaroline doses administered as 5- and 60-min infusions to adult and pediatric patients with normal renal function and mild renal impairment. For adults, 100 simulations of 300 patients each were performed for each dose regimen, and covariates were generated from a multivariate normal distribution using covariate correlations from observed data. For pediatric patients, 100 simulations were performed for each dose regimen with 600 patients in each 1-month age group. Weights for pediatric age groups were based on CDC growth charts.

Results

The median proportion of simulated patients with normal renal function achieving %fT>MIC targets of 35% and 44% (associated with 1-log kill of S. aureus and S pneumoniae, respectively), are shown for 5- and 60-min infusions (figure). PK/PD target attainment was similar for both infusion times and was >99% at an MIC of 1 mg/L for S. aureus and an MIC of 0.5 mg/L for S pneumoniae. Ceftaroline AUC was similar for both infusion times, and C_max was approximately 30%–40% higher for the 5-min infusion.

Conclusion

Ceftaroline fosamil gave as a 5-min infusion to adult and pediatric patients ≥2 months of age achieved similar PK/PD target attainment as a 60-min infusion for S. aureus and S pneumoniae for MICs up to 1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L, respectively.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators

Introduction

This retrospective analysis compares the probability of target attainment (PTA) for ceftriaxone, levofloxacin and ceftaroline fosamil against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in a representative patient population with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Methods

Published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, and an existing model for ceftaroline, were used with standard dosage regimens for simulating individual PK data with covariates representative of patients with CAP (5000 patients/drug regimen). PTA for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was calculated from steady state PK profiles for a range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) were also calculated using MIC distributions from 2012 to 2017 global surveillance data.

Results

Ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg q12 h) achieved > 90% PTA at all exposure targets for each pathogen at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) susceptibility breakpoints, and CFRs were > 99%. Ceftriaxone, but not levofloxacin, achieved 100% PTA and > 90% CFR against S. pneumoniae. Both levofloxacin and ceftriaxone achieved high PTA and CFR against H. influenzae. Levofloxacin achieved PTAs < 90% at EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints and ceftriaxone achieved PTAs < 90% at MICs up to 2 mg/L against S. aureus; both agents produced generally low CFRs against S. aureus (except levofloxacin against methicillin-sensitive S. aureus), reflecting the lack of activity of these agents against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Conclusion

Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated higher overall PTA rates than levofloxacin and ceftriaxone, in particular against S. aureus. These results provide insight regarding the potential comparative efficacy of the described antibiotics for moderate-to-severe CAP.

Funding

Pfizer.

Evaluation of the effect of tofacitinib on measured glomerular filtration rate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). During the clinical development programme, increases in mean serum creatinine (SCr) of approximately 0.07 mg/dL and 0.08 mg/dL were observed which plateaued early. This study assessed changes in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) with tofacitinib relative to placebo in patients with active RA.

Methods

This was a randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study (NCT01484561). Patients were aged ≥18 years with active RA. Patients were randomised 2:1 to oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) in Period 1 then placebo BID in Period 2 (tofacitinib → placebo); or oral placebo BID in both Periods (placebo → placebo). Change in mGFR was evaluated by iohexol serum clearance at four time points (run-in, pre-dose in Period 1, Period 1 end, and Period 2 end). The primary endpoint was the change in mGFR from baseline to Period 1 end. Secondary endpoints included: change in mGFR at other time points; change in estimated GFR (eGFR; Cockcroft–Gault equation) and SCr; efficacy; and safety.

Results

148 patients were randomised to tofacitinib → placebo (N = 97) or placebo → placebo (N = 51). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. A reduction of 8% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 14%) from baseline in adjusted geometric mean mGFR was observed during tofacitinib treatment in Period 1 vs placebo. During Period 2, mean mGFR returned towards baseline during placebo treatment, and there was no difference between the two treatment groups at the end of the study – ratio (tofacitinib → placebo/placebo → placebo) of adjusted geometric mean fold change of mGFR was 1.04 (90% CI: 0.97, 1.11). Post-hoc analyses, focussed on mGFR variability in placebo → placebo patients, were consistent with this conclusion. At study end, similar results were observed for eGFR and SCr. Clinical efficacy and safety were consistent with prior studies.

Conclusion

Increases in mean SCr and decreases in eGFR in tofacitinib-treated patients with RA may occur in parallel with decreases in mean mGFR; mGFR returned towards baseline after tofacitinib discontinuation, with no significant difference vs placebo, even after post-hoc analyses. Safety monitoring will continue in ongoing and future clinical studies and routine pharmacovigilance.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01484561. Registered 30 November 2011.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0612-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A model-based dose-response meta-analysis of ocular hypotensive agents as a drug development tool to evaluate new therapies in glaucoma

PURPOSE

To characterize dose and response for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and incidence of hyperemia using a model-based meta-analysis of IOP-lowering monotherapy studies to evaluate new ocular antihypertensive therapies for glaucoma.

METHODS

Published randomized controlled trials, regulatory documents, and sponsor reports of IOP-lowering monotherapies were used to develop dose-response models to characterize efficacy (IOP change from baseline) and safety (incidence of hyperemia) profiles.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis for efficacy included 31 trials with 6,516 patients receiving bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, timolol, or placebo. Estimated IOP reduction with placebo was -2.01 mmHg. Maximal IOP reduction was similar among the prostaglandin analogs (estimate, -6.27 mmHg; baseline, 25 mmHg). Estimated median effective IOP-lowering dose (ED50) was 0.002%, 0.00098%, and 0.00063% daily with bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost, respectively. The hyperemia (safety) analysis included 25 trials with 6,244 patients. Typical maximal estimated difference between drug and placebo was 43%, and estimated ED50 of 0.011%, 0.014%, and 0.0015% daily for bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost, respectively. Latanoprost treatment was predicted to incur the lowest rate of hyperemia of the prostaglandins, for equivalent IOP reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Model-based meta-analyses for IOP reduction and incidence of hyperemia among prostaglandin analogs are well described by maximal efficacy models and can provide a useful methodology for evaluating glaucoma therapies.

The social maps of children approaching adolescence: Studying the ecology of youth development

This article reports the first results of the three-year longitudinal study of the social maps of children beginning the transition to adolescence. This exploratory study is guided by Bronfenbrenner's conception of the ecology of human development, stressing the importance of a phenomenological orientation to development in the context of ecological transitions. The study focuses on characteristics of children's social networks (the web of relationships in which the individual is involved) as a function of neighborhood type, socioeconomic status, and level of physical maturation. The social heterogeneity of the social network (e.g., the relative salience of peers versus adults) is a primary concern. The child's and parent's perceptions of the network, of the people available to help the child, and the child's friends are compared within the context of ecological, socioeconomic, and maturational factors. The results (for 111 sixth-grade children from three contrasting neighborhood schools) shed some light on age segregation and the overall heterogeneity of the social environments of children facing the transition to adolescence. They provide a context and a baseline for the longitudinal study.

A phase 2, randomized, dose-response trial of taprenepag isopropyl (PF-04217329) versus latanoprost 0.005% in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety of escalating doses of taprenepag isopropyl (PF-04217329), a selective EP(2) receptor agonist administered as a topical ophthalmic solution, versus its vehicle (Stage I), and dose-response of taprenepag isopropyl alone and in unfixed combination with latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% versus latanoprost alone (Stage II).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Randomized, vehicle- and active-controlled, double-masked, two-stage, dose-finding trial in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension; first taprenepag isopropyl study in patients (NCT00572455). Study eye: 26 mmHg ≤ intraocular pressure (IOP) <36 mmHg at 8 am and 22 mmHg ≤ IOP <36 mmHg at 10 am, 1 pm, 4 pm. Stage I: 3 cohorts (total n = 67) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl unit dose formulation qPM/eye for 14 days: low dose: 0.0025%, 0.005%, vehicle; middle dose: 0.01%, 0.015%, vehicle; high dose: 0.02%, 0.03%, vehicle. Stage II: 7 groups (total n = 250) received 1 drop of taprenepag isopropyl multidose formulation qPM/eye for 28 days: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.015% monotherapy; each in unfixed combination with latanoprost 0.005%, or latanoprost monotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES

mean change in diurnal IOP, baseline to last visit; adverse events.

RESULTS

Stage I at day 14: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all taprenepag isopropyl doses versus vehicle. Stage II at day 28: statistically significantly greater IOP reductions were observed at all doses of the unfixed combination versus latanoprost monotherapy. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event reported for 29/67 (43.3%) subjects in Stage I and 158/250 (63.2%) in Stage II.

CONCLUSIONS

Taprenepag isopropyl significantly reduces IOP in POAG and ocular hypertension. Taprenepag isopropyl monotherapy is comparable to latanoprost 0.005% in reducing IOP. As demonstrated in this report, the activity of taprenepag isopropyl is additive to that of latanoprost 0.005%. Further studies are required to determine whether it shows similar additivity when administered with other ocular antihypertensive medications.

Latanoprost systemic exposure in pediatric and adult patients with glaucoma: a phase 1, open-label study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short-term safety and steady-state systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of latanoprost acid in pediatric subjects with glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received the adult latanoprost dose.

DESIGN

Phase 1, open-label, multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients of 3 age groups (<3, 3-<12, and 12-<18 years) and adults (≥18 years) receiving latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% once daily in 1 or both eyes for ≥2 weeks.

INTERVENTION

Latanoprost was administered in both eyes each morning post-screening. Subjects returned 3 to 28 days later for evaluation of plasma concentrations, withholding morning latanoprost. At the clinic, a single drop of latanoprost ophthalmic solution was instilled into both eyes. Plasma latanoprost acid concentrations were collected predose and 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Latanoprost acid plasma exposure.

RESULTS

The evaluable PK analysis set included data from 39 of 47 enrolled subjects. The median peak plasma concentration value was higher in the <3-year age group (166 pg/ml) versus other groups (49, 16, and 26 pg/ml for the 3-<12-year, 12-<18-year, and ≥18-year age groups, respectively). The median area under the concentration-time curve from zero to last measurable concentration value was also higher in the <3-year age group (2716 pg/min/ml) versus other groups (588, 106, and 380 pg/min/ml for the 3-<12-year, 12-<18-year, and ≥18-year age groups, respectively). Latanoprost acid was rapidly eliminated from the blood, with plasma concentrations undetectable within 10 to 30 minutes postdose in all but the <3-year age group. There were no discontinuations or dose reductions due to adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Latanoprost acid systemic exposure was higher in younger children versus adolescents and adults, attributed primarily to lower body weight and smaller blood volume. Latanoprost acid was eliminated rapidly in all age groups and resulted in only a brief period of systemic exposure after once-daily dosing. Higher systemic exposure was not accompanied by adverse events, and on the basis of extrapolation of safety data from adults, this pilot study suggests an adequate safety margin for systemic adverse effects with use of the adult topical dose of latanoprost in pediatric patients.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found after the references.

Phase I trial of SU014813 in patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies

3521

Background: SU014813 is an oral multi-targeted small molecule RTK inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, sKIT & FLT-3 at nM concentrations. This study was designed to determine the safety, PK, PD, & preliminary efficacy of SU014813. Methods: Cohorts of pts with (w/) relapsed or refractory solid tumors received oral SU014813 at 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, or 250 mg on a 4 wks on/1 wk off (4/1), or 100 or 150 mg on a continuous dose (CD) schedule. The MTD was defined as the highest dose at which 0 of 3 or 1 of 6 pts encountered DLT during Cycle 1. Primary study endpoints included safety & PK. Plasma VEGF receptor & ligand concentrations were measured by ELISA & antitumor activity was assessed by CT scan. Results: 77 pts (57 M, 20 F; mean age 54.3 yrs) w/ chemorefractory solid tumors (22 CRC, 12 NSCLC, 12 sarcoma, 6 RCC,25 other) were enrolled. The rate of grade 3/4 AEs increased at doses above 100 mg w/hypertension & fatigue occurring in 18 % & 12 % of pts, diarrhea (9%) & thrombocytopenia (5%). The MTD was determined to be 100 mg CD, which was well-tolerated w/ manageable G3 diarrhea (n=2/6). PK was generally dose-proportional; at 100 mg CD, Cmax = 255 ng/mL, Tmax = 3 h, C24h = 63 ng/mL. SU014813 decreased plasma VEGFR2 & R3 concentrations in a dose- dependent manner (50–200 mg doses) but rebounded off treatment (4/1 schedule). Plasma VEGF generally increased after treatment but effects were variable. Twelve pts had an objective response at =50 mg daily dose levels; 1 pt w/ RCC had CR (183 days [d]);11 pts had PR (2 RCC, 2 thymoma, 2 NSCLC, 1 CRC, 4 other)(median 235 d; range 35- 470); 14 pts had stable disease (SD; median 178 d, range 58–554). Seven other pts who did not meet RECIST response criteria had long disease stabilization (median 200 d; range 180 - 440). Conclusions: SU014813 has a manageable safety & tolerability profiles at the doses studied. The MTD & recommended Ph II dose were determined to be 100 mg CD, as SU014813 had linear PK, modulated plasma VEGF receptors consistent with RTK inhibition, & demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity w/ durable responses across several tumor types.

[Table: see text]

Cost-efficient higher-order crossover designs in comparative bioavailability studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cost is an extremely important factor to consider when planning drug clinical trials. Higher-order crossover designs have recently drawn considerable attention in comparative bioavailability studies because of their desirable statistical properties. In this paper, we compared the cost efficiency of five commonly used higher-order crossover designs under certain cost function for comparative bioavailability studies.

METHODS

Multivariate normal data were simulated under scenarios of a wide range of variability and correlations (coefficient of variation = 10-40%; correlation coefficient rho = 0.2-0.8). Monte Carlo simulations and mixed-effects models were carried out to obtain empirical sample sizes for each design using Schuirmann's two-one sided test procedure, under an 80% power and a 5% significance level, based on the US FDA bioequivalence criteria (80-125%). The five crossover designs studied were the two-period four-sequence (D2 x 4), the three-period two-sequence (D3 x 2), the three-period four-sequence (D3 x 4), the four-period two-sequence (D4 x 2), and the four-period four-sequence (D4 x 4). Costs for each design were then determined by a cost function, which takes into account costs for recruiting and screening, costs associated with period, and the overheads incurred for multiple sequences. Comparison of the costs for the above-mentioned designs was made under different scenarios.

RESULTS

There was no single design uniformly dominating the others in terms of cost efficiency for comparative bioavailability studies. The designs D3 x 2 and D4 x 4 (especially the former) have the best overall performance in terms of cost efficiency for comparative bioavailability studies. They dominated the other designs under most of the scenarios. The design D2 x 4 showed the worst performance among the five crossover designs.

CONCLUSIONS

A D3 x 2, and D4 x 2 crossover designs are recommended to achieve cost efficiency with a given power. The D2 x 4 crossover design is not recommended in general for comparative bioavailability studies.

Pharmacodynamics of glycopeptides in the mouse peritonitis model of Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus infection

The emergence of resistance to various antibiotics in pneumococci leaves the glycopeptides as the only antibiotics against which pneumococci have no resistance mechanism. This situation has led to a renewed interest in the use of glycopeptides. It has not yet been possible to conclude which one or more of the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters are the most important and best predictors for the effects of treatment with glycopeptides in animal models or in humans. We used the mouse peritonitis model with immunocompetent mice and with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae as infective organisms. A wide spectrum of different treatment regimens with vancomycin and teicoplanin was tested to study the pharmacodynamics of these drugs. In studies in which the single dose that protected 50% of lethally infected mice (ED(50)) was given as one dose or was divided into two doses, survival was significantly decreased when the dose was divided. The only statistically significant correlations between the percentage of survival of the mice after 6 days and each of the PK/PD parameters were for peak concentration (C(max))/MIC and S. aureus and for the free fraction of C(max) (C(max-free))/MIC and S. pneumoniae. For S. pneumoniae, the ED(50) for different dosing regimens increased with the number of doses given; e.g., the single-dose ED(50)s for vancomycin and teicoplanin were 0.65 and 0. 45 mg/kg, respectively, but the ED(50)s for dosing regimens with 2-h doses given for 48 h were 6.79 and 5.67 mg/kg, respectively. In experiments with 39 different vancomycin dosing regimens and 40 different teicoplanin dosing regimens against S. pneumoniae, the different PK/PD parameters were analyzed using logistic regression. The C(max-free)/MIC was one of two parameters that best explained the effect for both drugs; for vancomycin, the other important parameter was the AUC/MIC, and for teicoplanin, the other parameter was the time the free fraction of the drug is above the MIC. The effect analyzed as a function of C(max-free)/MIC disclosed thresholds with shifts from almost no effect to full effect at ratios of five to six for vancomycin and two to three for teicoplanin.