Evaluation of the Rapid Polymyxin NP test for detection of colistin susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from Thai patients

Full green assay of parenteral dosage forms of polymyxins utilizing xanthene dye: application to content uniformity testing

Due to the lack of other treatment options, a rebirth of polymyxins is urgently required. Colistin (also called polymyxin E) and polymyxin B are the only two examples of this antibiotic class that were effectively employed in such critical situations. In the present work, both of the two studied medications were quantified via a simple, green, and non-extracting spectrophotometric approach based on the formation of ion-pair complexes with Erythrosine B. Without using any organic solvents, the pink color of the created complexes was detected at wavelength = 558 nm. To achieve the highest intensity of absorbance, optimum conditions were established by the screening of many experimental factors such as pH, buffer volume, the volume of Erythrosine B, and the time consumed to undergo the reaction. For Colistin and Polymyxin B respectively, Beer-Lambert's law was observed at the concentration ranges of 1-6, 1-9 µg mL- 1. The technique was approved and validated following ICH recommendations. Lastly, the suggested approach has been successfully implemented to quantify the cited medications colorimetrically, for the first time, in their parenteral dosage forms with excellent recoveries. Also, Content uniformity testing was implemented.

Detection of polymyxins resistance among Enterobacterales: evaluation of available methods and proposal of a new rapid and feasible methodology

BACKGROUND

Fast and accurate detection of polymyxins resistance is necessary as they remain the last resources to treat infections caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in many regions. We evaluated the rapid colorimetric polymyxin B elution (RCPE) and developed its miniaturized version, RCPE microelution (RCPEm), aiming to detect polymyxins resistance among Enterobacterales.

METHODS

The methodologies consist of exposing the bacterial population in a solution (NP solution) where polymyxin B disks were previously eluted to obtain a concentration of 2 µg/mL for RCPE and 3 µg/mL for RCPEm.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-seven Enterobacterales were evaluated, 90 (33.7%) resistant to polymyxin B by broth microdilution. It was observed 0.6% of major error (ME) by RCPE, with a specificity of 99.4%. The miniaturized version (RCPEm) presented the same ME and specificity values, but slightly higher sensitivity (97.8% vs. 95.6%) with 2.2% of very major error (VME).

CONCLUSIONS

RCPE and RCPEm proved to be useful alternatives to determine polymyxin B susceptibility in clinical microbiology laboratories, presenting low cost, being easy to perform, and demanding short incubation time.

New validated spectrofluorimetric protocol for colistin assay through condensation with 2,2-dihydroxyindan-1,3-dione: application to content uniformity testing

A new, cost-effective and sensitive spectroscopic assay for the quantification of Colistin Sulfate (CS) and its prodrug colistimethate sodium (CMS) has been developed and validated. The validated technique depends on the condensation of the studied drug with 2,2-dihydroxyindan-1,3-dione (ninhydrin) and phenylacetaldehyde using Teorell and Stenhagen buffer (pH = 6) to yield a fluorescent product that is estimated at emission wavelength (λ em = 474 nm) after excitation wavelength (λ ex = 390 nm). The reaction's affecting factors were carefully studied and adjusted accurately. Over the following range (0.4-2.4 μg mL-1), the produced calibration plot looked rectilinear, and the estimated limits of detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ) were 0.051 & 0.154 μg mL-1 respectively. The recommended approach was utilized to evaluate market products containing the investigated drug. Moreover, content uniformity testing was employed as a new procedure not found in the previously reported fluorimetric technique.

Comparison of Six Phenotypic Assays with Reference Methods for Assessing Colistin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales: Challenges and Opportunities

The global escalation of severe infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolates has prompted increased usage of parenteral colistin. Considering the reported difficulties in assessing their susceptibility to colistin, the purpose of the study was to perform a comparative evaluation of six phenotypic assays—the colistin broth disc elution (CBDE), Vitek 2 Compact (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France), the Micronaut MIC-Strip Colistin (Merlin Diagnostika GMBH, Bornheim-Hensel, Germany), the gradient diffusion strip Etest (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France), ChromID Colistin R Agar (COLR) (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and the Rapid Polymyxin NP Test (ELITechGroup, Signes, France)—versus the reference method of broth microdilution (BMD). All false resistance results were further assessed using population analysis profiling (PAP). Ninety-two nonrepetitive clinical CPE strains collected from two hospitals were evaluated. The BMD confirmed 36 (39.13%) isolates susceptible to colistin. According to the BMD, the Micronaut MIC-Strip Colistin, the CBDE, and the COLR medium exhibited category agreement (CA) of 100%. In comparison with the BMD, the highest very major discrepancy (VMD) was noted for Etest (n = 15), and the only false resistance results were recorded for the Rapid Polymyxin NP Test (n = 3). Only the PAP method and the Rapid Polymyxin NP Test were able to detect heteroresistant isolates (n = 2). Thus, there is an urgent need to further optimize the diagnosis strategies for colistin resistance.

Global Prevalence and Molecular Epidemiology of mcr-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The continuing rise in infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria is one of the most serious public health issues in today's societies. Colistin is a last-resort antimicrobial medication used to treat infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacteria; therefore resistance to this antibiotic is extremely hazardous. The current study aimed to evaluate the global prevalence and distribution of colistin resistance genes among human clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a systematic review.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. For further evaluation, all original English-language articles that demonstrated colistin resistance in E. coli clinical isolates published between 2000 and 2020 were examined.

RESULTS

Out of 4857 initial articles, after various stages of review and evaluation, 190 related articles were selected. More than 79 % of the publications selected in this research were published from 2014 to 2020. In Asia, Europe, America, Africa, and Oceania, the prevalence of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) producing colistin-resistant E. coli was 66.72%, 25.48%, 5.19%, 2.27%, and 0.32 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The recent widespread spreading of E. coli strains harboring mcr conferring colistin resistance, especially in Asia and Europe, is concerning and needs more attention.

Performance of Rapid Polymyxin™ NP and Rapid Polymyxin™ Acinetobacter for the detection of polymyxin resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

The global spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) has prompted the reintroduction of colistin as a last-resort treatment. Although the recommended method for colistin susceptibility testing is broth microdilution (BMD), methods that are more rapid and easy to use are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of two commercial kits for colistin susceptibility testing: Rapid Polymyxin™ NP (RP-NP) for CRE and Rapid Polymyxin™ Acinetobacter (RP-AB) for CRAB.

METHODS

A total of 76 CRE and 87 CRAB isolates were collected from hospitalized patients in Europe and Israel. The isolates were subcultured twice on 5% sheep blood in tryptic soy agar. We tested colistin susceptibility using the RP-NP and RP-AB kits and compared the results with those from BMD.

RESULTS

Of the CRE isolates, 25% (19/76) were resistant to colistin using BMD. Categorical agreement between RP-NP and BMD was 93.4% (71/76), major errors 1.8% (1/57) and very major errors 21.1% (4/19). Sensitivity was 78.9% and specificity was 98.2%. Of the CRAB isolates, 58.6% (51/87) were resistant to colistin by BMD. Categorical agreement between RP-AB and BMD was 59.8% (52/87), major errors 13.9% (5/36) and very major errors 58.8% (30/51). Sensitivity of RP-AB was 41.2% and specificity was 86.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In many of the tested isolates, weak or inconclusive colour changes in the test wells caused difficulty in interpretation, resulting in an unacceptable rate of very major errors.

Current and emerging polymyxin resistance diagnostics: A systematic review of established and novel detection methods

The emergence of polymyxin resistance, due to transferable mcr genes, threatens public and animal health as there are limited therapeutic options. As polymyxin is one of the last-line antibiotics, there is a need to contain the spread of its resistance to conserve its efficacy. Herein, we describe current and emerging polymyxin resistance diagnostics to inform faster clinical diagnostic choices. A literature search in diverse databases for studies published between 2016 and 2020 was performed. English articles evaluating colistin resistance methods/diagnostics were included. Screening resulted in the inclusion of 93 journal articles. Current colistin resistance diagnostics are either phenotypic or molecular. Broth microdilution is currently the only gold standard for determining colistin MICs (minimum inhibitory concentration). Phenotypic methods comprise of agar-based methods such as CHROMagar™ Col-APSE, SuperPolymyxin, ChromID^® Colistin R, LBJMR and LB medium; manual MIC-determiners viz., UMIC, MICRONAUT MIC-Strip and ComASP Colistin; automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems such as BD Phoenix, MICRONAUT-S, MicroScan, Sensititre and Vitek 2; MCR-detectors such as lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) and chelator-based assays including EDTA- and DPA-based tests, that is, combined disk test, modified colistin broth-disk elution (CBDE), Colispot, and Colistin MAC test as well as biochemical colorimetric tests, that is, Rapid Polymyxin NP test and Rapid ResaPolymyxin NP test. Molecular methods only characterize mobile colistin resistance; they include PCR, LAMP and whole-genome sequencing. Due to the faster turnaround time (≤3 h), improved sensitivity (84%-100%) and specificity (93.3%-100%) of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin NP test and Fastinov^® , we recommend this test for initial screening of colistin-resistant isolates. This can be followed by CBDE with EDTA or the LFI as they both have 100% sensitivity and a specificity of ≥94.3% for the rapid screening of mcr genes. However, molecular assays such as LAMP and PCR may be considered in well-equipped clinical laboratories.

Colistin Susceptibility Testing by Rapid Colistin Disk Elution Test Among Enterobacteriaceae in Low-Resource Setting

We modified rapid polymyxin Nordmann-Poirel (RPNP) test, called rapid colistin disk elution (RCDE) test, for detecting colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacilli and evaluated its performance compared with colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The RCDE test was performed by using a 10-μg colistin disk in 2.7 mL volume (final colistin concentration of 3.7 μg/mL) of either cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth or phenol red broth base media with bacterial inoculum of 1-μL loop, and 1-4 and 16-20 hr incubation for Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, respectively. Both tests were evaluated in 236 Enterobacteriaceae and 49 A. baumannii isolates using broth microdilution as reference method. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, categorical agreement and very major error (VME or false intermediate susceptibility) rate were 98.3% and 5.4%, respectively, for the RCDE test, compared with 97.9% and 7.1%, respectively, for the CBDE test. Both tests had major error (ME or false resistance) rate of 0.6%. For the A. baumannii isolates, the RCDE and CBDE tests gave high VME rates of 8.3% and 16.7%, respectively. The RCDE test showed good performance comparable with the CBDE test but is cheaper and more rapid (3 hr) and convenient, thus suggesting as an alternative for detecting colistin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in low-income countries.

Polymyxin NP tests (from colonies and directly from blood cultures): accurate and rapid methodologies to detect polymyxin B susceptibility among Enterobacterales

Detection of polymyxins susceptibility is challenging. We aimed to evaluate Rapid Polymyxin NP from colonies (NP-colony) and directly from positive blood bottles (NP-bottle), using polymyxin B instead of colistin among Enterobacterales. Both had similar and acceptable accuracy. This is the first study performing NP-bottle using polymyxin B instead of colistin.

Difficulty in detecting low levels of polymyxin resistance in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: evaluation of Rapid Polymyxin NP test, Colispot Test and SuperPolymyxin medium

Polymyxins are important therapeutic options for treating infections, mainly those caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Specific chemical characteristics of polymyxins make it difficult to perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing, especially within the clinical laboratory. Here we aimed to evaluate the performance of three phenotypic methods: Rapid NP Polymyxin Test, ColiSpot test and the SuperPolymyxin medium. To accomplish this, 170 non-duplicate clinical K. pneumoniae isolates were analysed (123 colistin-resistant and 47 susceptible). The sensitivity and specificity obtained for Rapid Polymyxin NP Test, Colispot and SuperPolymyxin medium were, respectively, 90% and 94%, 74% and 100%, and 82% and 85%. Very major errors occurred more frequently in low-level colistin-resistant isolates (MICs 4 and 8 μg/mL). Rapid Polymyxin NP proved to be a method capable of identifying colistin-resistant strains in acceptable categorical agreement. However, major errors and very major errors of this method were considered unacceptable for colistin-resistance screening. Although the Colispot test is promising and easy to perform and interpret, the results did not reproduce well in the isolates tested. The colistin-containing selective medium (SuperPolymyxin) showed limitations, including quantification of mucoid colonies and poor stability. Nevertheless, Colispot and SuperPolymyxin medium methods did not present acceptable sensitivity, specificity and categorical agreement. It is essential to use analytical tools that faithfully reproduce bacterial resistance in vitro, especially in last-line drugs, such as polymyxins, when misinterpretation of a test can result in therapeutic ineffectiveness.