Influence of GeneXpert MRSA/SA test implementation on clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia - a before-after retrospective study

Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the clinical impact of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections is limited, and whether RDT are superior to conventional blood cultures (BCs) embedded within antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed network meta-analyses using results from studies of patients with bloodstream infection with the aim of comparing the clinical impact of RDT (applied on positive BC broth or whole blood) to conventional BC, both assessed with and without ASP with respect to mortality, length of stay (LOS), and time to optimal therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight papers were selected, including 25 682 patient encounters. There was an appreciable amount of statistical heterogeneity within each meta-analysis. The network meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in mortality associated with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.87) and with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC + ASP (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, .63-.96). No benefit in survival was found associated with the use of RDT alone nor with BC + ASP compared to BC alone. A reduction in LOS was associated with RDT + ASP versus BC alone (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, .84-.98) whereas no difference in LOS was shown between any other groups. A reduced time to optimal therapy was shown when RDT + ASP was compared to BC alone (-29 hours; 95% CI, -35 to -23), BC + ASP (-18 hours; 95% CI, -27 to -10), and to RDT alone (-12 hours; 95% CI, -20 to -3).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RDT + ASP may lead to a survival benefit even when introduced in settings already adopting effective ASP in association with conventional BC.

Approaches to Reduce Use and Duration of Anti-MRSA Agents for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Review of Recent Literature

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have the potential to effectively deescalate unnecessary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage. This review summarizes literature published from 2014 through 2021 describing contemporary ASP methods and their resulting effectiveness at reducing anti-MRSA agent use (ie vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and clindamycin). This review of the literature examined the following strategies, which had reports of success in either decreasing the use or duration of anti-MRSA agents: prospective review and feedback, antibiotic timeouts, health system or department protocol changes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid testing of patient samples. Most of the current literature continue to support most ASP interventions including antibiotic timeouts, pathways, and molecular testing including MRSA nasal PCRs and rapid diagnostic testing can be successful at reducing unnecessary anti-MRSA use.

Female Sex and Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of death due to bacterial bloodstream infection. Female sex has been identified as a risk factor for mortality in S aureus bacteremia (SAB) in some studies, but not in others.

Objective

To determine whether female sex is associated with increased mortality risk in SAB.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 26, 2023.

Study Selection

Included studies met the following criteria: (1) randomized or observational studies evaluating adults with SAB, (2) included 200 or more patients, (3) reported mortality at or before 90 days following SAB, and (4) reported mortality stratified by sex. Studies on specific subpopulations (eg, dialysis, intensive care units, cancer patients) and studies that included patients with bacteremia by various microorganisms that did not report SAB-specific data were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by 1 reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias and quality were assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Mortality data were combined as odds ratios (ORs).

Main Outcome and Measures

Mortality at or before 90-day following SAB, stratified by sex.

Results

From 5339 studies retrieved, 89 were included (132 582 patients; 50 258 female [37.9%], 82 324 male [62.1%]). Unadjusted mortality data were available from 81 studies (109 828 patients) and showed increased mortality in female patients compared with male patients (pooled OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18). Adjusted mortality data accounting for additional patient characteristics and treatment variables were available from 32 studies (95 469 patients) and revealed a similarly increased mortality risk in female relative to male patients (pooled adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27). No evidence of publication bias was encountered.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, female patients with SAB had higher mortality risk than males in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Further research is needed to study the potential underlying mechanisms.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship with the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay at a tertiary hospital in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Genetic testing is gaining increasing importance as a part of antimicrobial stewardship (AS). Rapid identification and determination of methicillin susceptibility using the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay can improve the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) and reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. However, few reports have described the effectiveness of this approach.

METHODS

The present study aimed to assess the influence of AS using the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay. Cases were classified into the pre-intervention group (n = 98 patients), in which SAB was identified by traditional culture (November 2017 to November 2019), and the post-intervention group (n = 97 patients), in which the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay was performed when necessary (December 2019 to December 2021).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics, prognosis, duration of antimicrobial use, and length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. The Xpert assay was performed in 66 patients in the post-intervention group (68.0%). The two groups showed no significant differences in severity and mortality. The rate of cases treated with anti-MRSA agents reduced following the intervention (65.3% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.008). The number of cases involving definitive therapy within 24 h was higher in the post-intervention group (9.2% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.007). The hospitalization rate at >60 days was lower in Xpert implementation cases among MRSA bacteremia cases (28.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay has potential as an AS tool, especially for early definitive treatment to SAB and reduction of long-term hospitalization in MRSA bacteremia cases.

Developing a multiplex PCR-based assay kit for bloodstream infection by analyzing genomic big data

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) has increased, the composition of pathogenic bacteria has changed, and drug resistance among bacteria has gradually increased due to the widespread use of interventional techniques, broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs, hormones, and immunosuppressive agents. Here, we have developed a multiplex PCR assay kit for the detection of pathogens (14 Gram-negative bacteria, 15 Gram-positive bacteria, and 4 fungi) in whole blood from patients with BSI using five-color fluorescent multiplex PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis. Our assay exhibits a diagnosis of higher quality and an improved detection rate for common pathogens.

METHODS

A local genome DNA database of 33 pathogenic bacteria was constructed. Next, "Exhaustive" primer search of the full coding sequence of the reference genomes of these bacteria was performed. Panels with minimal interactions between primers and amplicons were selected by random sampling and testing by a recursive algorithm. Primers and Mg²⁺ concentrations and PCR reaction procedures were optimized to maximize the detection efficacy.

RESULTS

The LOD of the kit was determined as 100 copies/μl. Using clinical samples, results generated by this kit and regular blood culture method were found to be 95.08% consistent. Additionally, six pathogens which were unidentifiable by blood culture were successfully detected by this kit.

CONCLUSION

Our study provided a bioinformatics approach to the challenge of primer design in multiplex PCR, and combined with optimized wet lab practice, a multiplex PCR-based assay kit for BSI with higher sensitivity and accuracy than blood culture was produced.

Management of Multidrug-Resistant Infections in Cirrhosis

The World Health Organization describes antimicrobial resistance as one of the biggest threats to global health, food security, and development with indiscriminate use of antimicrobials globally driving the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, resistant to 60% of antimicrobials in some countries. Infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) have increased in recent decades in patients with cirrhosis, who are frequently prescribed antibiotics, regularly undergo invasive procedures such as large volume paracentesis, and have recurrent hospitalizations, posing a particular risk in this already immunocompromised cohort of patients. In this review, we explore mechanisms underlying this vulnerability to MDRO infection; the effect of bacterial infections on disease course in cirrhosis; prevalence of MDROs in patients with cirrhosis; outcomes following MDRO infection; fungal infections; antibiotics and their efficacy; and management of MDRO infections in terms of detection, antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial treatments, prophylaxis, antibiotic stewardship, the gut microbiome, and technological interventions.

Impact of Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus Species in Positive Blood Culture Using GeneXpert Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/ Staphylococcus aureus Blood Culture Assay Combined with Antibiotic Stewardship

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a life-threatening condition associated with a substantial financial burden on the health care system. The use of the GeneXpert^® methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)/S. aureus blood culture (BC) test for the identification of S. aureus may influence antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes. This study assessed the clinical and financial impact of utilizing GeneXpert MRSA/SA in combination with criterion-based testing. The outcomes between October 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019, were evaluated in 65 adult patients who had positive BCs with Gram-positive cocci in clusters. GeneXpert MRSA/SA significantly shortened the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy by 1.7 days (2.5 vs. 44 hr, p < 0.0001). The cost saved because of interventions based on GeneXpert testing results was $4,121. GeneXpert testing has shortened the time to optimal therapy and positively impacted cost, although it had no significant effect on length of hospital stay and mortality rate.

Identification of Staphylococci by Polymerase Chain Reaction Directly from a Positive Blood Culture and Effect on Patient Care

BACKGROUND

As one of the most common bloodstream infections worldwide, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia places a major burden on health care. Implementation of a rapid, genetic-based diagnostic test may have important implications in the clinical management of patients with S. aureus bacteremia.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess concordance between testing based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the current gold standard, culture and sensitivity testing; the secondary objective was to assess the impact of this technology on patient care.

METHODS

A pre-post intervention retrospective chart review was used to document the hospital course of patients with a diagnosis of S. aureus bacteremia before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system. Laboratory results from all patient samples subjected to PCR-based analysis following implementation of this system were compared with culture and sensitivity data for the same samples to determine accuracy of the new system. In addition, time to optimal therapy for each patient was calculated as the interval between the initiation of empiric and terminal therapies. The appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment was characterized as guideline-concordant, nonconcordant with the guidelines, or nonconcordant yet still clinically appropriate.

RESULTS

In total, 98 and 99 patients met the inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the PCR-based diagnostic system, respectively. PCR-based results displayed 99.8% concordance (440/441 total samples) with results from culture and sensitivity testing. The time to optimal therapy was significantly shorter after implementation, by a mean of 22.8 h (p < 0.001). Overall, 97% of empiric and 99% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were either guideline-concordant or clinically appropriate for treatment of S. aureus bacteremia; 3% of empiric and 1% of terminal antimicrobial regimens were nonconcordant with clinical guidelines without any explanation based on other clinical considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings support the utility of using a direct-from-positive-blood-culture PCR-based diagnostic tool as the primary method of identifying S. aureus bacteremia in patients, as well as the acceptance of and acting upon the new assay's results by our local clinicians. PCR-based assays can help reduce the time to optimal terminal therapy for patients with bacteremia.

Advances in rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections

Septicemia from bloodstream infections (BSI) is the second largest cause of inpatient mortality and the single most expensive condition for US hospitals to manage. There has been an explosive development of commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of causative pathogens. Despite adoption of advanced technologies like matrix-assisted laser desorption imaging-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification, clinical impact has been variable, in part due to the persistent need for conventional AST as well as prescriber understanding of these rapidly evolving platforms. Newer technologies are expanding on rapid detection of genotypic determinants of resistance, but only recently has rapid phenotypic AST been available. Yet, improved outcomes with rapid diagnostic platforms are still most evident in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship. This review will outline key advancements in rapid diagnostics for BSI and the role of antimicrobial stewardship in this new era.

Evaluation of performance of the GENECUBE assay for rapid molecular identification of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance in positive blood culture medium

Rapid identification of causative agents from positive blood culture media is a prerequisite for the timely targeted treatment of patients with sepsis. The GENECUBE (TOYOBO Co., Ltd.) is a novel, fully-automated gene analyzer that can purify DNAs and amplify target DNAs. In this study, we evaluated the ability of two newly developed GENECUBE assays to directly detect the nuc and mecA genes in blood culture medium; nuc is specific to Staphylococcus aureus, and mecA indicates methicillin resistance. We examined 263 positive blood culture samples taken at three hospitals from patients suspected of having staphylococcal bacteremia. The results were then compared with those obtained using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Microscan system or Dry-plate EIKEN), and sequencing analysis. The GENECUBE assays had sensitivity and specificity of 100% in detecting both S. aureus and methicillin resistance in positive blood culture. The turnaround time of the examination was evaluated for 36 positive blood culture samples. The time between the initiation of incubation and completion of the GENECUBE examination was 23 h (interquartile range: IQR 21–37 h); the time between reporting of Gram stain examination and completion of the GENECUBE examination was 52 min (IQR 48–62 min). These findings show that the GENECUBE assays significantly reduce the assay time with no loss of sensitivity or specificity.