1
|
Vilas-Boas F, Rizzo GEM, De Ponthaud C, Robinson S, Gaujoux S, Capurso G, Vanella G, Bozkırlı B. Unveiling hidden outcomes in malignant gastric outlet obstruction research - insights from a "Pancreas 2000" review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16:451-461. [PMID: 39155997 PMCID: PMC11325868 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) is a major condition affecting patients with periampullary tumors, including pancreatic cancer. The current treatment options include surgical gastroenterostomy, endoscopic stenting and more recently EUS-guided gastroenterostomy. Most studies comparing the outcomes of the three procedures focus on technical success, clinical success and safety. Several "occult" outcomes relevant to the patient's viewpoints and perspective may ultimately impact on cancer-related and overall survival, such as body mass composition, nutritional biomarkers, chemotherapy tolerance and patient-reported quality of life. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of potential key outcomes that should be explored in future comparative research around mGOO treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Vilas-Boas
- Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, Porto 4200, Portugal
| | - Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare - The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies, Palermo 90127, Sicilia, Italy
| | - Charles De Ponthaud
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtriere, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, Île-de-France, France
| | - Stuart Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle NE7 7DN, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtriere, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, Île-de-France, France
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Division of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
| | - Bahadır Bozkırlı
- Department of General Surgery, HPB-Unit, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul 34398, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kastelijn JB, van de Pavert YL, Besselink MG, Fockens P, Voermans RP, van Wanrooij RLJ, de Wijkerslooth TR, Curvers WL, de Hingh IHJT, Bruno MJ, Koerkamp BG, Patijn GA, Poen AC, van Hooft JE, Inderson A, Mieog JSD, Poley JW, Bijlsma A, Lips DJ, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van Dullemen HM, Hoogwater FJH, Frederix GWJ, Molenaar IQ, Welsing PMJ, Moons LMG, van Santvoort HC, Vleggaar FP. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (ENDURO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:608. [PMID: 37749590 PMCID: PMC10518948 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07522-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a debilitating condition that frequently occurs in patients with malignancies of the distal stomach and (peri)ampullary region. The standard palliative treatment for patients with a reasonable life expectancy and adequate performance status is a laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) emerged as a promising alternative to the surgical approach. The present study aims to compare these treatment modalities in terms of efficacy, safety, and costs. METHODS The ENDURO-study is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. In total, ninety-six patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by an irresectable or metastasized malignancy will be 1:1 randomized to either SGJ or EUS-GE. The primary endpoint is time to tolerate at least soft solids. The co-primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with persisting or recurring symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction for which a reintervention is required. Secondary endpoints are technical and clinical success, quality of life, gastroenterostomy dysfunction, reinterventions, time to reintervention, adverse events, quality of life, time to start chemotherapy, length of hospital stay, readmissions, weight, survival, and costs. DISCUSSION The ENDURO-study assesses whether EUS-GE, as compared to SGJ, results in a faster resumption of solid oral intake and is non-inferior regarding reinterventions for persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms in patients with malignant GOO. This trial aims to guide future treatment strategies and to improve quality of life in a palliative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): NL9592. Registered on 07 July 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine B Kastelijn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yorick L van de Pavert
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas R de Wijkerslooth
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander C Poen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Alderina Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garcia-Alonso FJ, Chavarria C, Subtil JC, Aparicio JR, Busto Bea V, Martinez-Moreno B, Vila JJ, Martín-Álvarez V, Sanchez-Delgado L, de la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M. Prospective multicenter assessment of the impact of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy on patient quality of life in unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:28-35. [PMID: 36801458 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in inoperable patients. However, the impact of EUS-GE on patient quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated prospectively. METHODS Consecutive patients with unresectable malignant GOO who underwent EUS-GE between August 2019 and May 2021 at 4 Spanish centers were prospectively assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 at baseline and 1 month after the procedure. Centralized follow-up by telephone calls was undertaken. The Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) was used to assess oral intake, defining clinical success as a GOOSS ≥2. Differences between baseline and 30-day QoL scores were assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 33 (51.6%) men, with a median age of 77.3 years (interquartile range, 65.5-86.5). The most common diagnoses were pancreatic (35.9%) and gastric (31.3%) adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven patients (57.9%) presented a 2/3 baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Oral intake was restarted within 48 hours in 61 patients (95.3%), and the median postprocedure hospital stay was 3.5 days (interquartile range, 2-5). The 30-day clinical success rate was 83.3%. A clinically significant increase of 21.6 points (95% confidence interval, 11.5-31.7) in the global health status scale was documented, with significant improvements in nausea and vomiting, pain, constipation, and appetite loss. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GE relieves GOO symptoms in patients with unresectable malignancy, allowing rapid oral intake and hospital discharge. It also provides a clinically relevant increase in QoL scores at 30 days from baseline. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04660695.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Chavarria
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jose Carlos Subtil
- Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jose Ramón Aparicio
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Victoria Busto Bea
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Belén Martinez-Moreno
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan J Vila
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nakano Y, Mizumoto Y, Endoh B, Shimogama T, Iwamoto S, Esaka N, Ohta Y, Murai K, Murata M, Miyamoto S. Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with self-expandable metallic stents for treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023:1-8. [PMID: 36728729 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2173534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are widely accepted as a less-invasive treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, the factors related to prognosis and stent dysfunction after SEMS placement are not well known, and we aimed to investigate them. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of 212 malignant strictures in 207 patients. Factors related to prolonged overall survival (OS) and time to recurrent GOO (TRGOO) after SEMS placement were evaluated. RESULTS Improvement of oral intake was confirmed in 179 patients (86%). The median OS was 65 days. A Cox proportional hazards model revealed that lower cancer stage, lower performance status score at the time of SEMS placement, and administration of chemotherapy after SEMS placement were significant predictive factors for prolonged OS. The median OS was 182 days in the group of SEMS followed by chemotherapy (group A) and 43 days in the group of SEMS alone (group B) (p< .0001). Chemotherapy after SEMS implantation contributed to the prolongation of survival in gastric cancer (hazard ratio (HR), 0.12) and pancreatic cancer (HR, 0.41). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence rates of stent dysfunction on day 120 after SEMS placement were 30% in group A and 61% in group B (p=.03). Notably, the preventive effect of chemotherapy on stent dysfunction was significant in pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS SEMS is a treatment with high technical and clinical success rate for malignant GOO. Furthermore, subsequent chemotherapy prolongs OS especially in gastric cancer, and TRGOO in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Nakano
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Mizumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Bunji Endoh
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.,Seijinkai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Shimogama
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Iwamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoki Esaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Murai
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaki Murata
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shin'ichi Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adams AM, Reames BN, Krell RW. Morbidity and Mortality of Non-pancreatectomy operations for pancreatic cancer: An ACS-NSQIP analysis. Am J Surg 2023; 225:315-321. [PMID: 36088140 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with pancreas cancer may undergo palliative gastrointestinal or biliary bypass. Recent comparisons of post-operative outcomes following such procedures are lacking. METHODS We analyzed patients undergoing exploration, gastrojejunostomy, biliary bypass or double bypass for pancreatic cancer using data from the 2005-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We compared 30-day mortality and complications across procedures and over time periods (2005-10, 2011-14, 2015-19) using multivariable regression models. Factors associated with postoperative mortality were identified. RESULTS Of 43,525 patients undergoing surgery with a postoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, 5572 met inclusion criteria. Palliative operations included 1037 gastrojejunostomies, 792 biliary bypasses, 650 double bypasses, and 3093 explorations. The proportion of biliary and double bypass procedures decreased from 2005-10 to 2015-19. Gastrojejunostomy had higher 30-day mortality rate (11.5%) than other operations (p < 0.001). Adjusted 30-day mortality rates remained stable over time (7.8% vs 6.3%, p = 0.095), while rates of serious complications decreased over time (23.2% vs 17.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Palliative bypass for pancreatic cancer has not become safer over time, and 30-day mortality and complications remain high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra M Adams
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bradley N Reames
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Robert W Krell
- Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yao S, Kita R, Ishikawa K, Kumode T, Tanino K, Mizuno R, Matsui Y, Honma S, Murakami T, Kan T, Nakajima S, Kaihara S, Harada T. Is Palliative Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction an Optimal Choice for Very Elderly Patients? A Report from a Long-Lived Country. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:313-321. [PMID: 36171530 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12599-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) is a surgical option for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). Confronting an aging society, the demand to treat elderly cancer patients with unresectable malignancies is increasing; however, the benefit of GJ to the very elderly (≥ 80 years of age) has never been investigated. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective review included 108 patients who had undergone GJ for mGOO from two medical centers in Japan, one of the most long-lived countries. Patients were divided into two groups, with 80 years of age as the cut-off. Various factors, including surgical complications and patient survival, were compared. RESULTS GJ in the very elderly (aged ≥ 80 years) was associated with a higher incidence of surgical complications (p = 0.049), such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE; p < 0.001), aspiration pneumonia (p = 0.029), and consequent mortality (p = 0.016). Age ≥80 years was also identified as an independent predictor of DGE (odds ratio 6.444, p = 0.005) and survival after GJ (hazard ratio 7.767, p = 0.016). In particular, the median survival time after GJ in the population aged ≥80 years with gastric cancer was only < 2 months. About the surgical procedure, antiperistaltic anastomosis with partial stomach partitioning (PSP) yielded the lowest occurrence rate of DGE (3.4%) and aspiration pneumonia (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS GJ does not seem to be the optimal choice for very elderly patients, particularly those with gastric cancer. If performed, antiperistaltic anastomosis with PSP should be employed to reduce the surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Yao
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Ryosuke Kita
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kana Ishikawa
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kumode
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tanino
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Mizuno
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yugo Matsui
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shusaku Honma
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Teppei Murakami
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takatsugu Kan
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Sanae Nakajima
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kaihara
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takehisa Harada
- Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maetani I. How to successfully administer palliative treatment with a stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction? Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:967740. [PMID: 36017000 PMCID: PMC9395687 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.967740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic stenting (ES) has been widely used as a less-invasive palliation method for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), recent reports have highlighted issues related to the procedure. For successful treatment, various aspects must be assessed before considering the practices. First, it is necessary to eliminate cases with contraindications such as coexistence of distal small-bowel obstruction or perforation. Other factors potentially related to clinical failure (i.e., peritoneal carcinomatosis) may require consideration but remain controversial. ES has better short-term outcomes than surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ). GJ has recently been considered preferable in cases with longer life expectancy because of superior sustainability. Various types of stents are now commercially available, but their ideal structure and mechanical properties have not yet been clarified. Covered metal stent may reduce stent obstruction but is prone to increase stent migration, and its significance remains uncertain. Subsequent chemotherapy after stenting should be considered, as it is expected to prolong patient survival without increasing the risk of adverse events. Furthermore, it may be helpful in preventing tumor ingrowth. In cases with GOO combined with biliary obstruction, biliary intervention is often difficult. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been widely used as an alternative procedure for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (ETBD). Despite the lack of consensus as to whether ETBD or EUS-BD is preferred, EUS-BD is useful as a salvage technique for cases where ETBD is difficult. To perform stent placement successfully, it is important to pay attention to the above points; however, many remaining issues need to be clarified in the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
Campana LG, Fish R, Dickinson OT, McNamara MG, O'Dwyer ST, Laasch HU. Distal migration of a partially covered duodenal stent requiring emergency surgical extraction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2022. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii210044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Giovanni Campana
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Fish
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Theresa O'Dwyer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre (CPOC), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hans-Ulrich Laasch
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Minnova Medical Foundation CIC, Wilmslow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jue TL, Storm AC, Naveed M, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, McRee AJ, Truty MJ, Khashab MA, Agrawal D, Al-Haddad M, Amateau SK, Buxbaum JL, Calderwood AH, DeWitt J, DiMaio CJ, Fujii-Lau LL, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Kwon RS, Law JK, Lee JK, Pawa S, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of benign and malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:309-322.e4. [PMID: 33168194 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to address key clinical questions. These include the comparison of (1) surgical gastrojejunostomy to the placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant GOO, (2) covered versus uncovered SEMS for malignant GOO, and (3) endoscopic and surgical interventions for the management of benign GOO. Recommendations provided in this document were founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, considerations of patient and caregiver preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry L Jue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mariam Naveed
- Advent Health Medical Group, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Advent Health Hospital Altamonte Springs, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Autumn J McRee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark J Truty
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Mohammed Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart K Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - John DeWitt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Larissa L Fujii-Lau
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Suryakanth R Gurudu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Joanna K Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julie Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Sachin B Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Predictive and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Cancer Accompanied by Gastric Outlet Obstruction. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2020:6529563. [PMID: 32774358 PMCID: PMC7397385 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6529563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study is aimed at evaluating the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with distal gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 1564 individuals with distal gastric cancer from 2002 to 2010 was performed. In total, 157 patients had GOO. The clinicopathological features of the patients with GOO were compared with those of the patients without GOO. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess the overall survival. Results The patients with distal gastric cancer with GOO generally presented more aggressive pathologic features, a poorer nutritional status, more duodenal infiltration, and peritoneal dissemination than those with cancer without GOO. In the univariate analysis, curability, GOO, age, prealbumin, albumin, hemoglobin (Hb), the tumor size, the macroscopic type, lymph node metastasis, and the depth of invasion had a statistically significant influence on prognosis. The multivariate analysis showed that curability, GOO, the tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and the depth of invasion were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions Gastric cancer with GOO exhibits aggressive biological features and has poor outcomes. The multivariate analysis showed that curability, GOO, the tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and the depth of invasion were independent prognostic factors. The gastric outlet status should be considered in the selection of surgical treatment methods for patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zakaria A, Khan F, Ahmad S, Turk I, Levinson J. Massive gastric distension due to signet-ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9:2558-2561. [PMID: 32754546 PMCID: PMC7380801 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_170_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic massive gastric distention is a rare condition that can occur due to an underlying obstruction or dysmotility. Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is often the culprit that can manifest as the result of the luminal, mural, or extrinsic compression. Gastric adenocarcinoma can rarely manifest as massive gastric distention due to partially obstructing mass or peptic stricture. Severe and fatal sequelae may develop, if early detection and appropriate intervention are delayed, such as gastric decompression, endoscopic evaluation and/or surgical resection. Herein, we present a case of a 60-year-old male who presented with progressive worsening of nonspecific symptoms over the 8-month period. He was found to have remarkable massive gastric distention on imaging which was chronic in etiology secondary to GOO due to metastatic signet-ring cell gastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Zakaria
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Hospital/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, USA
| | - Fizan Khan
- Mercy Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Shehbaz Ahmad
- American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, USA
| | - Issam Turk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Hospital/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, USA
| | - Jay Levinson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Ascension Providence Hospital/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramos MFKP, Barchi LC, de Oliveira RJ, Pereira MA, Mucerino DR, Ribeiro Jr U, Zilberstein B, Cecconello I. Gastric partitioning for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11:1161-1171. [PMID: 31908721 PMCID: PMC6937443 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i12.1161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is one of the main complications in stage IV gastric cancer patients. This condition is usually managed by gastrojejunostomy (GJ). However, gastric partitioning (GP) has been described as an alternative to overcoming possible drawbacks of GJ, such as delayed gastric emptying and tumor bleeding.
AIM To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent GP and GJ for malignant GOO.
METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who underwent palliative gastric bypass for unresectable distal gastric cancer with GOO from 2009 to 2018. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics including age, nutritional status, body mass index, and performance status were evaluated. Obstructive symptoms were graded according to GOO score (GOOS). Surgical outcomes evaluated included duration of the procedure, surgical complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Acceptance of oral diet after the procedure, weight gain, and overall survival were the long-term outcomes evaluated.
RESULTS GP was performed in 30 patients and conventional GJ in the other 30 patients. The mean follow-up was 9.2 mo. Forty-nine (81.6%) patients died during that period. All variables were similar between groups, with the exception of worse performance status in GP patients. The mean operative time was higher in the GP group (161.2 vs 85.2 min, P < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and surgical mortality between groups. The median overall survival was 7 and 8.4 mo for the GP and GJ groups, respectively (P = 0.610). The oral acceptance of soft solids (GOOS 2) and low residue or full diet (GOOS 3) were reached by 28 (93.3%) GP patients and 22 (75.9%) GJ patients (P = 0.080). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GOOS 2 and GOOS 3 were the main prognostic factors for survival (hazard ratio: 8.90, 95% confidence interval: 3.38-23.43, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION GP is a safe and effective procedure to treat GOO. Compared to GJ, it provides similar surgical outcomes with a trend to better solid diet acceptance by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leandro Cardoso Barchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Jose de Oliveira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Marina Alessandra Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Donato Roberto Mucerino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro Jr
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Bruno Zilberstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| | - Ivan Cecconello
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo 01249000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moffat GT, Epstein AS, O’Reilly EM. Pancreatic cancer-A disease in need: Optimizing and integrating supportive care. Cancer 2019; 125:3927-3935. [PMID: 31381149 PMCID: PMC6819216 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy that continues to be challenging to treat. PDAC has the lowest 5-year relative survival rate compared with all other solid tumor malignancies and is expected to become the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2030. Given the high mortality, there is an increasing role for concurrent anticancer and supportive care in the management of patients with PDAC with the aims of maximizing length of life, quality of life, and symptom control. Emerging trends in supportive care that can be integrated into the clinical management of patients with PDAC include standardized supportive care screening, early integration of supportive care into routine cancer care, early implementation of outpatient-based advance care planning, and utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes for improved symptom management and quality of life. The most common symptoms experienced are nausea, constipation, weight loss, diarrhea, anorexia, and abdominal and back pain. This review article includes current supportive management strategies for these and others. Common disease-related complications include biliary and duodenal obstruction requiring endoscopic procedures and venous thromboembolic events. Patients with PDAC continue to have a poor prognosis. Systemic therapy options are able to palliate the high symptom burden but have a modest impact on overall survival. Early integration of supportive care can lead to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon T. Moffat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew S. Epstein
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eileen M. O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, MSK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5:CD012506. [PMID: 29845610 PMCID: PMC6494580 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012506.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is the clinical and pathological consequence of cancerous disease causing a mechanical obstruction to gastric emptying. It usually occurs when malignancy is at an advanced stage; therefore, people have a limited life expectancy. It is of paramount importance to restore oral intake to improve quality of life for the person in a manner that has a minimal risk of complications and a short recovery period. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of endoscopic stent placement versus surgical palliation for people with symptomatic malignant gastric outlet obstruction. SEARCH METHODS In May 2018 we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and Ovid CINAHL. We screened reference lists from included studies and review articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing stent placement with surgical palliation for people with gastric outlet obstruction secondary to malignant disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted study data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes, mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes and the hazard ratio (HR) for time-to-event outcomes. We performed meta-analyses where meaningful. We assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS We identified three randomised controlled trials with 84 participants. Forty-one participants underwent surgical palliation and 43 participants underwent duodenal stent placement. There may have been little or no difference in the technical success of the procedure (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; low-quality evidence), or whether the time to resumption of oral intake was quicker for participants who had undergone duodenal stent placement (MD -3.07 days, 95% CI -4.76 to -1.39; low-quality evidence).Due to very low-quality evidence, we were uncertain whether surgical palliation improved all-cause mortality and median survival postintervention.The time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms may have increased slightly following duodenal stenting (RR 5.08, 95% CI 0.96 to 26.74; moderate-quality evidence).Due to very low-quality evidence, we were uncertain whether surgical palliation improved serious and minor adverse events. The heterogeneity for adverse events was moderately high (serious adverse events: Chi² = 1.71; minor adverse events: Chi² = 3.08), reflecting the differences in definitions used and therefore, may have impacted the outcomes. The need for reintervention may have increased following duodenal stenting (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.36 to 16.30; very low-quality evidence).The length of hospital stay may have been shorter (by approximately 4 to 10 days) following stenting (MD -6.70 days, 95% CI -9.41 to -3.98; moderate-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The use of duodenal stent placement in malignant gastric outlet obstruction has the benefits of a quicker resumption of oral intake and a reduced inpatient hospital stay; however, this is balanced by an increase in the recurrence of symptoms and the need for further intervention.It is impossible to draw further conclusions on these and the other measured outcomes, primarily due to the low number of eligible studies and small number of participants which resulted in low-quality evidence. It was not possible to analyse the impact on quality of life each intervention had for these participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Upchurch
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Colorectal and Upper Gastrointestinal SurgerySandford RoadCheltenhamGloucestershireUKGL53 7AN
| | | | - Roberto Cirocchi
- University of PerugiaDepartment of General SurgeryTerniItaly05100
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ungureanu BS, Pătrașcu Ș, Drăgoescu A, Nicolau C, Copăescu C, Șurlin V, Săftoiu A. Comparative Study of NOTES Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Gastrojejunostomy in Pigs: A Prospective Study. Surg Innov 2017; 25:16-21. [DOI: 10.1177/1553350617748278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ștefan Pătrașcu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Alice Drăgoescu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Carmen Nicolau
- “Lotus Life” Gastroenterology Private Hospital, Targu Mures, Romania
| | | | - Valeriu Șurlin
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Adrian Săftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
- Copenhagen University Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Medrano-Guzmán R, Valencia-Mercado D, Luna-Castillo M, García-Ríos LE, González-Rodríguez D. Factores pronóstico de sobrevida en adenocarcinoma gástrico avanzado resecable. CIR CIR 2016; 84:469-476. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2016.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
17
|
Minata MK, Bernardo WM, Rocha RSDP, Morita FHA, Aquino JCM, Cheng S, Zilberstein B, Sakai P, de Moura EGH. Stents and surgical interventions in the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E1158-E1170. [PMID: 27857965 PMCID: PMC5111833 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-115935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims: Palliative treatment of gastric outlet obstruction can be done with surgical or endoscopic techniques. This systematic review aims to compare surgery and covered and uncovered stent treatments for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Patients and methods: Randomized clinical trials were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACs, BVS, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases. Comparison of covered and uncovered stents included: technical success, clinical success, complications, obstruction, migration, bleeding, perforation, stent fracture and reintervention. The outcomes used to compare surgery and stents were technical success, complications, and reintervention. Patency rate could not be included because of lack of uniformity of the extracted data. Results: Eight studies were selected, 3 comparing surgery and stents and 5 comparing covered and uncovered stents.The meta-analysis of surgical and endoscopic stent treatment showed no difference in the technical success and overall number of complications. Stents had higher reintervention rates than surgery (RD: 0.26, 95 % CI [0.05, 0.47], NNH: 4). There is no significant difference in technical success, clinical success, complications, stent fractures, perforation, bleeding and the need for reintervention in the analyses of covered and uncovered stents. There is a higher migration rate in the covered stent therapy compared to uncovered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) in the palliation of malignant GOO (RD: 0.09, 95 % CI [0.04, 0.14], NNH: 11). Nevertheless, covered stents had lower obstruction rates (RD: - 0.21, 95 % CI [-0.27, - 0.15], NNT: 5). Conclusions: In the palliation of malignant GOO, covered SEMS had higher migration and lower obstruction rates when compared with uncovered stents. Surgery is associated with lower reintervention rates than stents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil,Corresponding author Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata University of São Paulo Medical SchoolGastrointestinal Endoscopy UnitGastroenterology DepartmentAvenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 1556º andar São Paulo SP05013001 Brazil+55112661-0000
| | | | - Rodrigo Silva de Paula Rocha
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Morita
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Julio Cesar Martins Aquino
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Spencer Cheng
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bruno Zilberstein
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Digestive Surgery, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Sakai
- University of São Paulo Medical School, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Incorporating Shared Decision Making into Perioperative Care of Older Adults. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40137-016-0148-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson CD, Biankin AV, Neale RE, Tempero M, Tuveson DA, Hruban RH, Neoptolemos JP. Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2:16022. [PMID: 27158978 DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1168] [Impact Index Per Article: 146.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a major cause of cancer-associated mortality, with a dismal overall prognosis that has remained virtually unchanged for many decades. Currently, prevention or early diagnosis at a curable stage is exceedingly difficult; patients rarely exhibit symptoms and tumours do not display sensitive and specific markers to aid detection. Pancreatic cancers also have few prevalent genetic mutations; the most commonly mutated genes are KRAS, CDKN2A (encoding p16), TP53 and SMAD4 - none of which are currently druggable. Indeed, therapeutic options are limited and progress in drug development is impeded because most pancreatic cancers are complex at the genomic, epigenetic and metabolic levels, with multiple activated pathways and crosstalk evident. Furthermore, the multilayered interplay between neoplastic and stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment challenges medical treatment. Fewer than 20% of patients have surgically resectable disease; however, neoadjuvant therapies might shift tumours towards resectability. Although newer drug combinations and multimodal regimens in this setting, as well as the adjuvant setting, appreciably extend survival, ∼80% of patients will relapse after surgery and ultimately die of their disease. Thus, consideration of quality of life and overall survival is important. In this Primer, we summarize the current understanding of the salient pathophysiological, molecular, translational and clinical aspects of this disease. In addition, we present an outline of potential future directions for pancreatic cancer research and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorg Kleeff
- NIHR Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Murray Korc
- Departments of Medicine, and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, and the Pancreatic Cancer Signature Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Minoti Apte
- SWS Clinical School, University of New South Wales, and Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Colin D Johnson
- University Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, Bearsden, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Rachel E Neale
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Margaret Tempero
- UCSF Pancreas Center, University of California San Francisco - Mission Bay Campus/Mission Hall, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Departments of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John P Neoptolemos
- NIHR Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Halsema EE, Rauws EAJ, Fockens P, van Hooft JE. Self-expandable metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A pooled analysis of prospective literature. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12468-12481. [PMID: 26604654 PMCID: PMC4649130 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To provide an overview of the clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO).
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed of the literature published between January 2009 and March 2015. Only prospective studies that reported on the clinical success of stent placement for MGOO were included. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined according to the definition used in the original article. Data were pooled and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Subgroup analyses were performed for partially covered SEMSs (PCSEMSs) and uncovered SEMSs (UCSEMSs) using Fisher’s exact test.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies, including 1281 patients, were included in the final analysis. Gastric (42%) and pancreatic (37%) cancer were the main causes of MGOO. UCSEMSs were used in 76% of patients and PCSEMSs in 24%. The overall pooled technical success rate was 97.3% and the clinical success rate was 85.7%. Stent dysfunction occurred in 19.6% of patients, mainly caused by re-obstruction (12.6%) and stent migration (4.3%), and was comparable between PCSEMSs and UCSEMSs (21.2% vs 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.412). Re-obstruction was more common with UCSEMSs (14.9% vs 5.1%, P < 0.001) and stent migration was more frequent after PCSEMS placement (10.9% vs 2.2%, P < 0.001). The overall perforation rate was 1.2%. Bleeding was reported in 4.1% of patients, including major bleeding in 0.8%. The median stent patency ranged from 68 to 307 d in five studies. The median overall survival ranged from 49 to 183 d in 13 studies.
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes in this large population showed that enteral stent placement was feasible, effective and safe. Therefore, stent placement is a valid treatment option for the palliation of MGOO.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Malignant biliary obstruction, duodenal, and gastric outlet obstruction, and tumor-related pain are the complications of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma that most frequently require palliative intervention. Surgery involving biliary bypass with or without gastrojejunostomy was once the mainstay of treatment in these patients. However, advances in non-operative techniques-most notably the widespread availability of endoscopic biliary and duodenal stents-have shifted the paradigm of treatment away from traditional surgical management. Questions regarding the efficacy and durability of endoscopic stents for biliary and gastric outlet obstruction are reviewed and demonstrate high rates of therapeutic success, low rates of morbidity, and decreased cost. Surgery remains an effective treatment modality, and still produces the most durable relief in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Stark
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - O Joe Hines
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gu JF, Ding W, Hu J, Li ZY, Li MF. Treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction by endoscopic metal stent implantation with argon plasma coagulation: Analysis of 27 cases. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014; 22:4482-4486. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v22.i29.4482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic self-expandable metal stent implantation with argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.
METHODS: Clinical data for 54 patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction diagnosed from February 2010 to November 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided two groups: a control group (n = 27) and a treatment group (n = 27). The control group was treated by implantation of simple metal stents, while the treatment group was treated by implantation of self-expandable metal stents with argon plasma coagulation.
RESULTS: Self-expandable metal stent placement was successful in all patients. Fifty-four patients were able to take liquid food and soft food within 24 h after the procedure. Pain developed in 4 cases in the control group, and 2 cases in the treatment group. Three cases in the control group developed restenosis 2 mo after surgery, while only one case in the treatment group had restenosis 4.3 mo after surgery. No bleeding or perforation occurred. Two cases in the control group died after 6 mo. The treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of symptoms, food intake, survival and quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Placement of a self-expandable metal stent combined with argon plasma coagulation in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction is safe and effective for resolving obstruction symptoms.
Collapse
|
23
|
Keränen I, Kylänpää L, Udd M, Louhimo J, Lepistö A, Halttunen J, Kokkola A. Gastric outlet obstruction in gastric cancer: a comparison of three palliative methods. J Surg Oncol 2013; 108:537-41. [PMID: 24590674 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) commonly occurs in advanced gastric cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the results of endoscopic stenting (ES), palliative resection (PR), and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) as palliation of GOO. METHODS A total of 97 patients (50 ES, 26 PR, 21 GJ) were included in this retrospective study. All the patients had primary gastric cancer and symptoms of GOO. RESULTS Compared to surgery, ES resulted in a faster improvement on oral intake and symptom relief (P < 0.001) and a shorter hospitalization (P < 0.001). Complication rates, hospital re-admissions, occurrence of biliary obstruction, and the number of patients receiving chemotherapy were similar. The median symptom-free and overall survival were longest in the PR group (P < 0.001). In multivariate survival analysis, independent prognostic factors were age, BMI, pre-procedure GOOSS, palliative resection as treatment modality, and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In gastric cancer and GOO, the clinical condition of the patient before treatment affects survival and should be taken into account in determining the treatment. PR seems to provide a survival benefit and should be considered as treatment option for patients suitable for surgery. For patients unfit for surgery, ES provides rapid and efficient palliation. Chemotherapy also seems to improve survival in gastric cancer and GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Keränen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUS, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Werner J, Combs SE, Springfeld C, Hartwig W, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10:323-33. [PMID: 23629472 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive cancers, and surgical resection is a requirement for a potential cure. However, the majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, either metastatic (50%) or locally advanced cancer (30%). Although palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic disease, management of locally advanced adenocarcinoma is controversial. Several treatment options, including extended surgical resections, neoadjuvant therapy with subsequent resections, as well as palliative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, should be considered. However, there is little evidence available to support treatment options for locally advanced disease. As valid predictive biomarkers for stratification of therapy are not available today, future trials need to define the role of the different treatment options. This Review summarizes the current evidence and discusses available treatment options for both locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Park JC, Park JJ, Cheoi K, Chung H, Lee H, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC. Clinical outcomes of secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement for primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:999-1005. [PMID: 22835857 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2012] [Revised: 06/21/2012] [Accepted: 06/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a substantial number of patients require secondary stents insertion due to primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction, data on the outcomes of secondary self-expanding metal stents are sparse. AIM To investigate clinical outcomes and factors related with secondary stent malfunction in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction given secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent insertion. METHODS For this retrospective study, a total 77 patients who underwent secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement for primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction were enrolled. We compared the effectiveness and complications of secondary covered and uncovered stents and explored the predictive factors for stent malfunction. RESULTS Stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placements were technically successful in all patients. Both groups also had comparable clinical success rates (covered stent, 87.2% and uncovered stent, 90.0%, P = 1.000). Stent malfunction rates (31.9% and 36.7% respectively, P = 0.805) and median patency time of stent (165 [95% confidence interval: 112-218] and 165 [95% confidence interval: 126-204] days, respectively, P = 0.358) were similar between secondary covered and uncovered stents. Longer patients' survival time (≥ 100 days) was associated with increased risk of stent malfunction (odds ratio: 4.598; 95% confidence interval: 1.473-14.355; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement is feasible and effective treatment for primary stent malfunctions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Covered and uncovered stent are equally acceptable in terms of stent-related complications and stent patency, regardless of primary stent type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Chul Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Strand DS, Thlick JEC, Patrie JT, Gaidhane MR, Kahaleh M, Wang AY. Gastroduodenal stents are associated with more durable patency as compared to percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy in the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY 2012; 2:150-154. [PMID: 23687600 DOI: 10.4161/jig.23749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2012] [Revised: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 12/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroduodenal outlet obstruction (GOO) is a critical complication of cancers localized within and adjacent to the upper gastrointestinal tract. Approaches to the relief of GOO include surgical bypass with gastrojejunostomy (GJ), endoluminal placement of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J). To date no studies have compared the outcome of utilizing PEG-J with other modalities of therapy. OBJECTIVES To determine if there is a difference in complications or effectiveness when survival and/or device patency of PEG-J is compared to that of gastroduodenal SEMS in patients with malignant GOO. METHODS Patients who underwent placement of either PEG-J or gastroduodenal SEMS for unresectable malignant GOO were included in a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS 24 patients (12 men) with a median age of 68.5 years underwent either PEG-J (n=12) or gastroduodenal SEMS (n=12) placement. Patients undergoing SEMS placement experienced longer overall device patency and/or survival as compared to those undergoing PEG-J (median 70 versus 35 days). Complications, including the need for re-intervention, were similar among both groups. Patients who underwent PEG-J as compared to those that had SEMS placement had a hazard ratio of 3.85 (CI 1.28-11.11) for decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION In patients with malignant GOO, placement of a palliative SEMS for gastric decompression and nutrition was associated with longer aggregate device patency and survival as compared to PEG-J. Both modalities were similar with respect to complications and the need for re-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Larssen L, Hauge T, Medhus AW. Stent treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: the effect on rate of gastric emptying, symptoms, and survival. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2955-60. [PMID: 22538695 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2291-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2011] [Accepted: 03/29/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced pancreatic cancer and other malignancies located proximal to the small bowel might cause gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) resulting in nausea, vomiting, dehydration, and malnutrition. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to a large extent have replaced surgical treatment, with gastro-entero-anastomosis as palliative treatment for GOO. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of duodenal stenting on the rate of gastric emptying, symptoms, and survival. METHODS Patients with endoscopically verified malignant obstruction of the proximal duodenum were included. Gastric emptying rate was measured prior to and within 1 week after stent placement using a meal containing (13)C-octanoic acid as a marker. Symptoms related to GOO were assessed by the patients before and 2 weeks after stent treatment and during the gastric emptying tests. All patients were followed up until death. RESULTS In the patients included (n = 17), all studied variables of gastric emptying improved significantly following treatment, and a reduction in self-reported obstructive symptoms was observed. There was no correlation between survival and the rate of gastric emptying before or after, or the change in the rate of emptying. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that treatment with SEMS results in improved gastric emptying in most patients with GOO and a corresponding reduction in self-reported obstruction symptoms. However, survival and emptying were not related. The present findings provide further evidence that treatment with stents is an effective palliative treatment in patients with GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Larssen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, Ullevål, 0407, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|