1
|
Chai C, Tang X, Chi X, Li X, Zhang H, Wu L. Therapeutic effects of coptisine derivative EHLJ7 on colorectal cancer by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway. Cell Signal 2024; 116:111053. [PMID: 38224723 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2024.111053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world with high mortality rate. EHLJ7 is a quaternary coptisine derivative synthesized by our institute. In this study, the role and mechanism of EHLJ7 on CRC are further elucidated. Using target fishing, colon cancer-associated target screening and molecular docking analysis, PI3K/AKT pathway was selected for the target of EHLJ7 at CRC. Results of Flow cytometry, wound healing assay and transwell migration assay confirmed that EHLJ7 could inhibit migration and apoptosis of colon cancer cells by specifically inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway in vitro. Xenograft tumor models and a newly established azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)/Peptostreptococcus anaerobiu (P.anaerobius)-induced CRC mouse model are applied to access the anti-cancer action and mechanism of EHLJ7 using western-blot, immunohistochemistry and analysis of exosomes. The key findings in this study are listed as follows: (1) EHLJ7 exerts superior anti-tumor effect with good safety on Xenograft tumor model and CRC model; (2) EHLJ7 exerted its anti-CRC effect by specifically inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. In summary, we demonstrated that EHLJ7 exerts therapeutic effect against CRC by PI3K/AKT pathway, which made it possible as a potentially effective compound for the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ChangWei Chai
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - XiaoNan Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - XiaoQian Chi
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Xiang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - HaiJing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China.
| | - LianQiu Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Della Valle PG, Deandrea S, Battisti F, Brusa P, Mantellini P, Mantovani W, Narne E, Odone A, Senore C. The community pharmacy model for colorectal cancer screening: Policy insights from a national programme. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:1595-1601. [PMID: 37657965 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Italy, a recent national project has expanded local collaboration between colorectal (CRC) screening programmes and pharmacies to the national level. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the existing agreements between regional authorities and pharmacy owners in Italy regarding CRC screening programmes, to make internationally available the most qualifying elements of the collaboration. METHODS We analyzed the agreements, in force on 01/08/2021, arranged between the Regions and their respective pharmacy owners, describing the process phases addressed such as the faecal occult blood test pathway and supplementary activities provided by the pharmacies together with the CRC screening kit delivery. RESULTS Agreements were received from 18 Regions (86% of the total). The amount of money paid for each kit varies a lot, with a range from 0 to 18 EUR. The number of process phases covered by the agreements ranged from a maximum of 16 (out of 18) to a minimum of 0. The processes most frequently covered were the supply/delivery of kits and education/awareness of CRC screening (68.8%). Less covered processes were warehouse management and awareness of other healthcare initiatives (12.5%), and delivery of preparation for intestinal cleansing (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS Arrangements between pharmacies and CRC screening programmes in Italy vary widely and lack a unified model. Collaboration quality standards should be set at the national/international level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Deandrea
- University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Pavia Health Protection Agency, Pavia, Italy; Directorate General for Health, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Battisti
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Firenze, Italy
| | - P Brusa
- Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - P Mantellini
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Firenze, Italy
| | - W Mantovani
- Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | | | - A Odone
- University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Senore
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smits LJH, van Lieshout AS, Bosker RJI, Crobach S, de Graaf EJR, Hage M, Laclé MM, Moll FCP, Moons LMG, Peeters KCMJ, van Westreenen HL, van Grieken NCT, Tuynman JB. Clinical consequences of diagnostic variability in the histopathological evaluation of early rectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1291-1297. [PMID: 36841695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In early rectal cancer, organ sparing treatment strategies such as local excision have gained popularity. The necessity of radical surgery is based on the histopathological evaluation of the local excision specimen. This study aimed to describe diagnostic variability between pathologists, and its impact on treatment allocation in patients with locally excised early rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locally excised pT1-2 rectal cancer were included in this prospective cohort study. Both quantitative measures and histopathological risk factors (i.e. poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, and lymphatic- or venous invasion) were evaluated. Interobserver variability was reported by both percentages and Fleiss' Kappa- (ĸ) or intra-class correlation coefficients. RESULTS A total of 126 patients were included. Ninety-four percent of the original histopathological reports contained all required parameters. In 73 of the 126 (57.9%) patients, at least one discordant parameter was observed, which regarded histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastases in 36 patients (28.6%). Interobserver agreement among different variables varied between 74% and 95% or ĸ 0.530-0.962. The assessment of lymphovascular invasion showed discordances in 26% (ĸ = 0.530, 95% CI 0.375-0.684) of the cases. In fourteen (11%) patients, discordances led to a change in treatment strategy. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that there is substantial interobserver variability between pathologists, especially in the assessment of lymphovascular invasion. Pathologists play a key role in treatment allocation after local excision of early rectal cancer, therefore interobserver variability needs to be reduced to decrease the number of patients that are over- or undertreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne J H Smits
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annabel S van Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stijn Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eelco J R de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Cappelle aan de IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Mariska Hage
- Department of Pathology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Freek C P Moll
- Department of Pathology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanaka K, Sobue T, Zha L, Kitamura T, Sawada N, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Yamaji T, Tsugane S. Effectiveness of Screening Using Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy on the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. J Epidemiol 2023; 33:91-100. [PMID: 34053963 PMCID: PMC9794451 DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20210057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few cohort studies have used multiple surveys of screening attendance to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy. METHODS We analyzed data of 30,381 middle-aged Japanese adults from a population-based prospective cohort study. Information on FOBT and colonoscopy was obtained from three questionnaire surveys (every 5 years). We classified the subjects into three groups: the FOBT (15,649 subjects), screening colonoscopy (2,407 subjects), and unscreened (12,325 subjects) groups. We used the unscreened group as the reference group to compare the mortality and incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). RESULTS During the 14-year follow-up, 64, 12, and 104 CRC deaths were identified in the FOBT, screening colonoscopy, and unscreened groups, respectively. The risk of CRC death reduced with increasing the number of FOBTs (P for trend = 0.02) and was reduced by 44% in the subjects screened twice or thrice using FOBT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.94). Significant decreases were seen for the incidence of CRC but not seen for the incidence of non-advanced CRC in the FOBT group. Concerning the screening colonoscopy, subjects screened at the start of follow-up showed a 69% reduced risk of CRC death (HR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.9996). Significant decreases were also seen for the incidence of CRC and non-advanced CRC in the subjects screened at the start of follow-up. CONCLUSION FOBT, depending on the number of FOBTs, and colonoscopy, depending on recency, reduced the risk of death due to CRC and the incidence of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Tanaka
- Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Sobue
- Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ling Zha
- Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsuhisa Kitamura
- Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norie Sawada
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manami Inoue
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiki Yamaji
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichiro Tsugane
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tran TN, Hoeck S, De Schutter H, Janssens S, Peeters M, Van Hal G. The Impact of a Six-Year Existing Screening Programme Using the Faecal Immunochemical Test in Flanders (Belgium) on Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Survival: A Population-Based Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1654. [PMID: 36674409 PMCID: PMC9864341 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been increasingly used for organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assessed the impact of a six-year existing FIT screening programme in Flanders (Belgium) on CRC incidence, mortality and survival. The Flemish CRC screening programme started in 2013, targeting individuals aged 50-74 years. Joinpoint regression was used to investigate trends of age-standardised CRC incidence and mortality among individuals aged 50-79 years (2004-2019). Their 5-year relative survival was calculated using the Ederer II method. We found that FIT screening significantly reduced CRC incidence, especially that of advanced-stage CRCs (69.8/100,000 in 2012 vs. 51.1/100,000 in 2019), with a greater impact in men. Mortality started to decline in men two years after organised screening implementation (annual reduction of 9.3% after 2015 vs. 2.2% before 2015). The 5-year relative survival was significantly higher in screen-detected (93.8%) and lower in FIT non-participant CRCs (61.9%) vs. FIT interval cancers and CRCs in never-invited cases (67.6% and 66.7%, respectively). Organised FIT screening in Flanders clearly reduced CRC incidence (especially advanced-stage) and mortality (in men, but not yet in women). Survival is significantly better in screen-detected cases vs. CRCs in unscreened people. Our findings support the implementation of FIT organised screening and the continued effort to increase uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy Ngan Tran
- Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
- Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah Hoeck
- Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
- Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Sharon Janssens
- Research Department, Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
- Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Guido Van Hal
- Centre for Cancer Detection, 8000 Bruges, Belgium
- Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardoso R, Guo F, Heisser T, De Schutter H, Van Damme N, Nilbert MC, Christensen J, Bouvier AM, Bouvier V, Launoy G, Woronoff AS, Cariou M, Robaszkiewicz M, Delafosse P, Poncet F, Walsh PM, Senore C, Rosso S, Lemmens VE, Elferink MA, Tomšič S, Žagar T, Marques ALDM, Marcos-Gragera R, Puigdemont M, Galceran J, Carulla M, Sánchez-Gil A, Chirlaque MD, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Overall and stage-specific survival of patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer in European countries: A population-based study in 9 countries. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 21:100458. [PMID: 35832063 PMCID: PMC9272368 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An increasing proportion of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are detected through screening due to the availability of organised population-based programmes. We aimed to analyse survival probabilities of patients with screen-detected CRC in European countries. Methods Data from CRC patients were obtained from 16 population-based cancer registries in nine European countries. We included patients with cancer diagnosed from the year organised CRC screening programmes were introduced until the most recent year with available data at the time of analysis, whose ages at diagnosis fell into the age groups targeted by screening. Patients were followed up with regards to vital status until 2016-2020 across the various countries. Overall and CRC-specific survival were analysed by mode of detection and stage at diagnosis for all countries combined and for each country separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. Findings We included data from 228 134 patients, of whom 134 597 (aged 60-69 years at diagnosis targeted by screening in all countries) were considered in analyses for all countries combined. 22·3% (38 080/134 597) of patients had cancer detected through screening. Most screen-detected cancers were found at stages I-II (65·6% [12 772/19 469 included in stage-specific analyses]), while the majority of non-screen-detected cancers were found at stages III-IV (56·4% [31 882/56 543 included in stage-specific analyses]). Five-year overall and CRC-specific survival rates for patients with screen-detected cancer were 83·4% (95% CI 82·9-83·9) and 89·2% (88·8-89·7), respectively; for patients with non-screen-detected cancer, they were much lower (57·5% [57·2-57·8] and 65·7% [65·4-66·1], respectively). The favourable survival of patients with screen-detected cancer was also seen within each stage – five-year overall survival rates for patients with screen-detected stage I, II, III, and IV cancers were 92.4% (95% CI 91·6-93·1), 87·9% (86·6-89·1), 80·7% (79·3-82·0), and 32·3 (29·4-35·2), respectively. These patterns were also consistently seen for each individual country. Interpretation Patients with cancer diagnosed at screening have a very favourable prognosis. In the rare case of detection of advanced stage cancer, survival probabilities are still much higher than those commonly reported for all patients regardless of mode of detection. Although these results cannot be taken to quantify screening effects, they provide useful and encouraging information for patients with screen-detected CRC and their physicians. Funding This study was supported in part by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the German Cancer Aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Cardoso
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Feng Guo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Heisser
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Mef Christina Nilbert
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Hvidovre University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive cancer registry of Burgundy, University Hospital of Dijon, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), Inserm, U1231 Dijon, France
| | - Véronique Bouvier
- Digestive Tumors Registry of Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, U1086 INSERM UCN - ANTICIPE, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), France
| | - Guy Launoy
- Normandie Univ, UniCaen, Inserm, Anticipe, 14000 Caen, France
- University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | | | - Mélanie Cariou
- Digestive Tumors Registry of Finistère, CHRU Morvan, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), Brest, France
| | - Michel Robaszkiewicz
- Digestive Tumors Registry of Finistère, CHRU Morvan, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), Brest, France
| | - Patricia Delafosse
- Cancer Registry of Isère, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), Grenoble, France
| | - Florence Poncet
- Cancer Registry of Isère, French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM), Grenoble, France
| | | | - Carlo Senore
- University Hospital ‘Città della Salute e della Scienza’, SSD Epidemiologia e screening – CPO, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Valery E.P.P. Lemmens
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marloes A.G. Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sonja Tomšič
- Slovenian Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina Žagar
- Slovenian Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Rafael Marcos-Gragera
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
- Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Salt, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Montse Puigdemont
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
- Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Salt, Spain
| | - Jaume Galceran
- Tarragona Cancer Registry, Epidemiology and Prevention Cancer Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Pere Virgili Health Research Institute (IISPV), Reus, Spain
| | - Marià Carulla
- Tarragona Cancer Registry, Epidemiology and Prevention Cancer Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Pere Virgili Health Research Institute (IISPV), Reus, Spain
| | - Antonia Sánchez-Gil
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - María-Dolores Chirlaque
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Corresponding author at: Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chan DN, So WK, Choi KC. Participation in a government-subsidised colorectal cancer screening programme for asymptomatic individuals in Hong Kong. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Law CC, Wong CH, Chong PS, Mang OW, Lam AW, Chak MM, Lee RS, Wong KH, Ho RK. Effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in down-staging. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102184. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Lew JB, Feletto E, Worthington J, Roder D, Canuto K, Miller C, D’Onise K, Canfell K. The potential for tailored screening to reduce bowel cancer mortality for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia: modelling study. J Cancer Policy 2022; 32:100325. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
10
|
Luu XQ, Lee K, Jun JK, Suh M, Jung KW, Choi KS. Effect of colorectal cancer screening on long-term survival of colorectal cancer patients: Results of the Korea National Cancer Screening Program. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:1958-1967. [PMID: 35099813 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The Korea National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) provides fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for people aged ≥50 years. This study aimed to investigate the long-term survival effects of CRC screening based on screening history and interval time since screening. The study cohort was obtained by linking three national databases, namely the Korea Central Cancer Registry, KNCSP database, and Death Certificate. We included 32 509 CRC patients diagnosed in 2008-2009, who underwent CRC screening via the KNCSP between 2004 and 2009. The patients were followed-up until 2019, and their survival was assessed according to their CRC screening history. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare time to deaths among CRC patients according to CRC screening history, after adjusting for covariates. Of the 32 509 patients, 20 022 (61.5%) patients were alive by the end of 2019. Long-term survival was significantly higher among screened patients (68.2%) than non-screened (57.2%) individuals. Compared with never-screened patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for CRC-specific death in screened patients was 0.77 (95% CI%, 0.73-0.80). Lowest HR was observed in screened, localized CRC patients (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42-0.56); HR for CRC-specific death was the lowest in patients screened within 12 months of diagnosis (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74), following which, the HRs increased with increasing time interval. CRC screening was positively associated with favorable prognosis in CRC patients aged 50-79 years. The effects on long-term survival according to interval time was the best among individuals screened within one year before diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Quy Luu
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Kyeongmin Lee
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Kyu-Won Jung
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Kui Son Choi
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pin-Vieito N, Puga M, Fernández-de-Castro D, Cubiella J. Faecal immunochemical test outside colorectal cancer screening? World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6415-6429. [PMID: 34720531 PMCID: PMC8517780 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are the most widely colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostic biomarker available. Many population screening programmes are based on this biomarker, with the goal of reducing CRC mortality. Moreover, in recent years, a large amount of evidence has been produced on the use of FIT to detect CRC in patients with abdominal symptoms in primary healthcare as well as in surveillance after adenoma resection. The aim of this review is to highlight the available evidence on these two topics. We will summarize the evidence on diagnostic yield in symptomatic patients with CRC and significant colonic lesion and the different options to use this (thresholds, brands, number of determinations, prediction models and combinations). We will include recommendations on FIT strategies in primary healthcare proposed by regulatory bodies and scientific societies and their potential effects on healthcare resources and CRC prognosis. Finally, we will show information regarding FIT-based surveillance as an alternative to endoscopic surveillance after high-risk polyp resection. To conclude, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, FIT-based strategies have become extremely relevant since they enable a reduction of colonoscopy demand and access to the healthcare system by selecting individuals with the highest risk of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Pin-Vieito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense 32005, Spain
| | - Manuel Puga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense 32005, Spain
| | - Daniel Fernández-de-Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense 32005, Spain
| | - Joaquín Cubiella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Ourense 32005, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lew JB, Greuter MJE, Caruana M, He E, Worthington J, St John DJ, Macrae FA, Feletto E, Coupé VMH, Canfell K. Validation of Microsimulation Models against Alternative Model Predictions and Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:815-829. [PMID: 32845232 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20944869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background. This study aimed to assess the validity of 2 microsimulation models of colorectal cancer (CRC), Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA. Methods. The model-estimated CRC risk in population subgroups with different health statuses, "dwell time" (time from incident precancerous polyp to symptomatically detected CRC), and reduction in symptomatically detected CRC incidence after a one-time complete removal of polyps and/or undetected CRC were compared with published findings from 3 well-established models (MISCAN, CRC-SPIN, and SimCRC). Furthermore, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that provided screening using a guaiac fecal occult blood test (Funen trial, Burgundy trial, and Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study [MCCCS]) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (NORCCAP, SCORE, and UKFSST) with long-term follow-up were simulated. Model-estimated long-term relative reductions of CRC incidence (RRinc) and mortality (RRmort) were compared with the RCTs' findings. Results. The Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA estimates showed more similarities to CRC-SPIN and SimCRC. For example, overall dwell times estimated by Policy1-Bowel (24.0 years) and ASCCA (25.3) were comparable to CRC-SPIN (25.8) and SimCRC (25.2) but higher than MISCAN (10.6). In addition, ∼86% of Policy1-Bowel's and ∼74% of ASCCA's estimated RRinc and RRmort were consistent with the RCTs' long-term follow-up findings. For example, at 17 to 18 years of follow-up, the MCCCS reported RRmort of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.83) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.62-0.97) for the annual and biennial screening arm, respectively, and the UKFSST reported RRmort of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79) for CRC at all sites and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.65) for distal CRC. The corresponding model estimates were 0.65, 0.74, 0.81, and 0.61, respectively, for Policy1-Bowel and 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, and 0.58, respectively, for ASCCA. Conclusion. Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA's estimates are largely consistent with the data included for comparisons, which indicates good model validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Bin Lew
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Caruana
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily He
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - D James St John
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Prevention Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, and Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Canfell
- School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Colorectal Cancer Survival in 50- to 69-Year-Olds after Introducing the Faecal Immunochemical Test. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092412. [PMID: 32854370 PMCID: PMC7565457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Population screening has improved early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nonetheless, most cases are diagnosed in symptomatic patients. Faecal immunochemical testing has been recommended for assessing patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms, but whether it improves patient survival is unknown. Our objective was to compare CRC survival in 50- to 69-year-olds between asymptomatic screen-detected patients and symptomatic patients by route to diagnosis. Methods: We identified all cases of CRC diagnosed in 50-to 69-year-olds between 2009 and 2016, in Donostialdea (Gipuzkoa, Spain). Three groups were created: 1-screen-detected CRC; 2-CRC detected in symptomatic patients after a positive faecal immunochemical test(FIT); and 3-CRC detected in symptomatic patients without a FIT or after a negative result. We analysed survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Results: Of 930 patients diagnosed with CRC, 433 cases were detected through screening and 497 in symptomatic patients, 7.9% after a positive FIT and 45.5% by other means. The 3-year CRC survival was significantly lower in group 3 (69.5%) than groups 1 (93%; p = 0.007) or 2 (87.5%; p = 0.02). The risk of death was lower in groups 1 (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.58) and 2 (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.29–0.87). Conclusion: Half of CRC cases in 50- to 69-year-olds are diagnosed outside screening. Use of the FIT as a diagnostic strategy in symptomatic patients may improve survival.
Collapse
|
14
|
Worthington J, Lew JB, Feletto E, Holden CA, Worthley DL, Miller C, Canfell K. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227899. [PMID: 32012174 PMCID: PMC6996821 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) provides biennial immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening for people aged 50-74 years. Previous work has quantified the number of colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths prevented by the NBCSP and has shown that it is cost-effective. With a 40% screening participation rate, the NBCSP is currently underutilised and could be improved by increasing program participation, but the maximum appropriate level of spending on effective interventions to increase adherence has not yet been quantified. OBJECTIVES To estimate (i) reductions in CRC cases and deaths for 2020-2040 attributable to, and (ii) the threshold for cost-effective investment (TCEI) in, effective future interventions to improve participation in the NBCSP. METHODS A comprehensive microsimulation model, Policy1-Bowel, was used to simulate CRC natural history and screening in Australia, considering currently reported NBCSP adherence rates, i.e. iFOBT participation (∼40%) and diagnostic colonoscopy assessment rates (∼70%). Australian residents aged 40-74 were modelled. We evaluated three scenarios: (1) diagnostic colonoscopy assessment increasing to 90%; (2) iFOBT screening participation increasing to 60% by 2020, 70% by 2030 with diagnostic assessment rates of 90%; and (3) iFOBT screening increasing to 90% by 2020 with diagnostic assessment rates of 90%. In each scenario, we estimated CRC incidence and mortality, colonoscopies, costs, and TCEI given indicative willingness-to-pay thresholds of AUD$10,000-$30,000/LYS. RESULTS By 2040, age-standardised CRC incidence and mortality rates could be reduced from 46.2 and 13.5 per 100,000 persons, respectively, if current participation rates continued, to (1) 44.0 and 12.7, (2) 36.8 and 8.8, and (3) 31.9 and 6.5. In Scenario 2, 23,000 lives would be saved from 2020-2040 vs current participation rates. The estimated scenario-specific TCEI (Australian dollars or AUD$/year) to invest in interventions to increase participation, given a conservative willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$10,000/LYS, was (1) AUD$14.9M, (2) AUD$72.0M, and (3) AUD$76.5M. CONCLUSION Significant investment in evidence-based interventions could be used to improve NBCSP adherence and help realise the program's potential. Such interventions might include mass media campaigns to increase program participation, educational or awareness interventions for practitioners, and/or interventions resulting in improvements in referral pathways. Any set of interventions which achieves at least 70% iFOBT screening participation and a 90% diagnostic assessment rate while costing under AUD$72 million annually would be highly cost-effective (<AUD$10,000/LYS) and save 23,000 additional lives from 2020-2040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Worthington
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eleonora Feletto
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia
| | - Carol A. Holden
- South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia
| | - Daniel L. Worthley
- South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia
| | - Caroline Miller
- South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hsu CH, Hsiao CW, Sun CA, Wu WC, Yang T, Hu JM, Liao YC, Huang CH, Chen CY, Lin FH, Chou YC. Multiple gene promoter methylation and clinical stage in adjacent normal tissues: Effect on prognosis of colorectal cancer in Taiwan. Sci Rep 2020; 10:145. [PMID: 31924802 PMCID: PMC6954240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56691-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study provide an insight that the panel genes methylation status in different clinical stage tended to reflect a different prognosis even in matched normal tissues, to clinical recommendation. We enrolled 153 colorectal cancer patients from a medical center in Taiwan and used the candidate gene approach to select five genes involved in carcinogenesis pathways. We analyzed the relationship between DNA methylation with different cancer stages and the prognostic outcome. There were significant trends of increasing risk of 5-year time to progression and event-free survival of subjects with raising number of hypermethylation genes both in normal tissue and tumor tissue. The group with two or more genes with aberrant methylation in the advanced cancer stages (Me/advanced) had lower 5-year event-free survival among patients with colorectal cancer in either normal or tumor tissue. The adjusted hazard ratios in the group with two or more genes with aberrant methylation with advanced cancer stages (Me/advanced) were 8.04 (95% CI, 2.80–23.1; P for trend <0.01) and 8.01 (95% CI, 1.92–33.4; P for trend <0.01) in normal and tumor tissue, respectively. DNA methylation status was significantly associated with poor prognosis outcome. This finding in the matched normal tissues of colorectal cancer patients could be an alternative source of prognostic markers to assist clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Hsiung Hsu
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Teaching Office, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Wen Hsiao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chien-An Sun
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Big Data Research Center, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wen-Chih Wu
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Department of Surgery, Suao and Yuanshan branches of Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yilan County, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Tsan Yang
- Department of Health Business Administration, Meiho University, Pingtung County, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Je-Ming Hu
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Adjunct Instructor, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yu-Chan Liao
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chi-Hua Huang
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chao-Yang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Adjunct Instructor, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Fu-Huang Lin
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ching Chou
- Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. .,School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evaluation of [ 18F]FDG/[ 18F]FLT/[ 18F]FMISO-based micro-positron emission tomography in detection of liver metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Nucl Med Biol 2019; 72-73:36-44. [PMID: 31330410 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Positron emission tomography (PET) is extensively used in clinical oncology for tumor detection. This study aimed to explore the application of the radiotracers [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), 3'-deoxy-3'- [18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT), and [18F]fluoromisonidazole ([18F]FMISO) in the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic metastasis in human colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A mouse model of human CRC with hepatic metastasis was established by intrasplenic implantation of human CRC cell lines LoVo or HCT8. Metastatic potential of these two cell lines was evaluated by wound healing assay in vitro and survival analysis. Uptake of radiotracers between LoVo and HCT8 cells and uptake of radiotracers in the resulting mouse tumor models were examined by in vivo and in vitro experiments. Uptake of each radiotracer in hepatic metastatic lesions was quantified and expressed as standard uptake value (SUV). Protein expression of multiple tumor biomarkers was determined in metastatic lesions. The correlation between tracer uptake and tumor marker expression was evaluated using linear regression. RESULTS LoVo cells exhibited a stronger metastatic potential and a higher radiotracer uptake ability than HCT8 cells, as evidenced by significantly greater wound closure percentage, shorter survival, higher incidence of liver metastases, and higher cellular radiotracer levels in LoVo cells or LoVo cell-xenografted mice. SUV values of [18F]FLT and [18F]FMISO, but not [18F]FDG, in LoVo cell-derived metastatic lesions were significantly greater than those in HCT8 lesions. Mechanistically, the expression of MACC1, HIF-1α, and GLUT-1(metastasis associated in colon cancer 1, MACC1; hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, HIF-1α; and glucose transporter 1, GLUT-1, respectively) in LoVo cell-derived metastatic lesions was more effectively induced than in HCT8-derived ones. A linear regression analysis demonstrated significant positive correlations between [18F]FLT/[18F]FMISO uptake and tumor biomarker expression in metastatic tissues. CONCLUSIONS [18F]FLT and [18F]FMISO-based PET imaging may serve as a promising method for early detection and monitoring of hepatic metastasis in patients with CRC.
Collapse
|
17
|
Participation in a population-based screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal immunochemical test decreases mortality in 5 years. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31:197-204. [PMID: 30543575 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The steady increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) could be reversed through timely secondary prevention (screening) as a main strategy. The aims of this study were to determine the main features of CRC, survival rate and related factors for different types of identified CRCs in a population-based screening programme using the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). MATERIALS AND METHODS The CRCs in the susceptible population to be screened between 2009 and 2014 were identified and classified into four groups: (a) nonscreening-detected CRC (diagnosed before first screening invitation and nonparticipants), (b) screening-detected CRC, (c) interval cancer (IC) FIT (diagnosed between screening rounds after a negative FIT) and (d) IC colonoscopy (diagnosed before the colonoscopy surveillance, which is recommended after the screening colonoscopy). Patient demographics and epidemiological characteristics, tumour characteristics and survival were compared between the four groups. RESULTS 5909 individuals were diagnosed with a CRC. The median follow-up of survival was 4.6 years (range: 0-9 years). The study highlights a significant difference (P<0.0001) in the 5-year survival in the screening-detected CRC group compared with those who had nonscreening-detected CRCs (90.1 vs. 66.7%). Although ICs are not desirable events, the 5-year survival rate is significantly higher with respect to nonparticipants (P<0.0001) (76.3 vs. 60.5%), this being the group with the lowest survival rate. CONCLUSION The significantly higher 5-year survival rate of 23.4% of the participants in the screening programme suggests that incidence and mortality rates of CRC will decrease in the near future for participants in screening programmes. A high participation rate is essential to achieve health benefits, irrespective of the type of participation.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lew JB, St John DJB, Macrae FA, Emery JD, Ee HC, Jenkins MA, He E, Grogan P, Caruana M, Greuter MJE, Coupé VMH, Canfell K. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:1450-1461. [PMID: 30190276 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) is rolling out 2-yearly immunochemical fecal occult blood test screening in people aged 50 to 74 years. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of extending the NBCSP to younger and/or older ages. METHODS A comprehensive validated microsimulation model, Policy1-Bowel, was used to simulate the fully rolled-out NBCSP and alternative strategies assuming screening starts at 40 or 45 years and/or ceases at 79 or 84 years given three scenarios: (i) perfect adherence (100%), (ii) high adherence (60%), and (ii) low adherence (40%, as currently achieved). RESULTS The current NBCSP will reduce colorectal cancer incidence (mortality) by 23% to 51% (36% to 74%) compared with no screening (range reflects participation); extending screening to younger or older ages would result in additional reductions of 2 to 6 (2 to 9) or 1 to 3 (3 to 7) percentage points, respectively. With an indicative willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000/life-year saved (LYS), only screening from 50 to 74 years [incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER): A$2,984-5,981/LYS) or from 45 to 74 years (ICER: A$17,053-29,512/LYS) remained cost-effective in all participation scenarios. The number-needed-to-colonoscope to prevent a death over the lifetime of a cohort in the current NBCSP is 35 to 49. Starting screening at 45 years would increase colonoscopy demand for program-related colonoscopies by 3% to 14% and be associated with 55 to 170 additional colonoscopies per additional death prevented. CONCLUSIONS Starting screening at 45 years could be cost-effective, but it would increase colonoscopy demand and would be associated with a less favorable incremental benefits-to-harms trade-off than screening from 50 to 74 years. IMPACT The study underpins recently updated Australian colorectal cancer management guidelines that recommend that the NBCSP continues to offer bowel screening from 50 to 74 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. .,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - D James B St John
- Prevention Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, and Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kindgom
| | - Hooi C Ee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily He
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul Grogan
- Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.,The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Decker KM, Nugent Z, Lambert P, Biswanger N, Singh H. Interval colorectal cancer rates after Hemoccult Sensa and survival by detection mode for individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Winnipeg, Manitoba. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203321. [PMID: 30180176 PMCID: PMC6122818 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the performance of the Sensa fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in a population-based screening program. Setting Manitoba, Canada. Methods This historical cohort study included individuals 52 to 74 years of age diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 2008 to 2013. CRCs were categorized by detection following a screening program FOBT (Sensa), non-program FOBT (non-Sensa), or no FOBT. Screening program CRCs were classified as program-detected, interval program, or non-compliant. Logistic regression was used to compare characteristics by detection mode. Cox regression adjusted for lead-time was used to examine the effect of detection mode on survival. Results 1,498 individuals were diagnosed with CRC; 132 (8.8%) had a screening program FOBT, 626 (41.8%) had a non-program FOBT, and 740 (49.4%) had no FOBT. Of the screening program FOBT CRCs, 72 were program-detected (54.5%), 42 were interval program (31.8%), and 18 were non-compliant (13.6%). Sensa interval cancer rate was 37.4% and sensitivity was 63.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 54.3%-72.0%). The risk of death for individuals that had a non-program (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57, 95% CI:0.44–0.75) or a screening program FOBT (HR = 0.55, 95% CI:0.31–0.97) was lower than no FOBT. There was no significant difference in the risk of death for interval, non-compliant, and non-program CRCs compared to program-detected CRCs. Adjusting for lead time bias, sex, income quintile, tumour location, and age at diagnosis did not appreciably change the risk estimates. Conclusion More than one-third of CRCs may not be detected by Sensa. There may be no difference in survival between CRC detected by Sensa and non-Sensa FOBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M. Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Zoann Nugent
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pascal Lambert
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Natalie Biswanger
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Medical Oncology and Haematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Larsen MB, Njor S, Ingeholm P, Andersen B. Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Detecting Earlier-Stage Disease-A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:99-106. [PMID: 29626451 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most studies of the effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using the fecal occult blood test tested the guaiac fecal occult blood test. However, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is now commonly used in screening. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FIT-based screening for CRC on the number of incident CRC diagnoses and stage at diagnosis for individuals in Denmark who were invited for screening vs not yet invited. METHODS We collected data for this register-based retrospective cohort study during the first 16 months of the prevalence round of a FIT-based CRC screening program (March 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015). A total of 402,826 residents of Denmark (50-72 years old) were randomly invited to undergo CRC screening within the study period, and 956,514 were invited thereafter. We obtained information on CRC diagnosis, date, and stage at diagnosis from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Cancer incidence per 100,000 invited/not yet invited individuals was calculated, along with the relative risk (RR) of CRC among invited compared with not yet invited individuals. RESULTS CRC incidence during the study period was 339.4/100,000 invited individuals and 169.6/100,000 not yet invited individuals. CRC incidence increased with age among invited and not yet invited individuals. For invited women compared with not yet invited women, the RR of being diagnosed with stage I CRC was 3.39 (95% CI, 2.61-4.39), with stage II CRC was 2.16 (95% CI, 1.71-2.72), with stage III CRC was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.08-1.75), and with stage IV CRC was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.68-1.23). For invited men compared with not yet invited men, the RR of being diagnosed with stage I CRC was 3.71 (95% CI, 2.97-4.64); with stage II CRC was 2.26 (95% CI, 1.84-2.77), with stage III CRC was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.53-2.30), and with stage IV CRC was 1.20 (95% CI, 0.95-1.52). CONCLUSIONS In analyzing data from a register-based cohort study in Denmark, we found that inviting individuals to undergo FIT-based CRC screening led to detection of almost 2-fold more cases of CRC than not inviting participants. The significant increase of CRC incidence among those invited for screening indicates a need for awareness of treatment capacity in countries introducing FIT-based CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark.
| | - Sisse Njor
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Peter Ingeholm
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lew JB, St John DJB, Macrae FA, Emery JD, Ee HC, Jenkins MA, He E, Grogan P, Caruana M, Sarfati D, Greuter MJE, Coupé VMH, Canfell K. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:269-282. [PMID: 29441568 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) will fully roll-out 2-yearly screening using the immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Testing (iFOBT) in people aged 50 to 74 years by 2020. In this study, we aimed to estimate the comparative health benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening with iFOBT, versus other potential alternative or adjunctive technologies. A comprehensive validated microsimulation model, Policy1-Bowel, was used to simulate a total of 13 screening approaches involving use of iFOBT, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, computed tomographic colonography (CTC), faecal DNA (fDNA) and plasma DNA (pDNA), in people aged 50 to 74 years. All strategies were evaluated in three scenarios: (i) perfect adherence, (ii) high (but imperfect) adherence, and (iii) low adherence. When assuming perfect adherence, the most effective strategies involved using iFOBT (annually, or biennially with/without adjunct sigmoidoscopy either at 50, or at 54, 64 and 74 years for individuals with negative iFOBT), or colonoscopy (10-yearly, or once-off at 50 years combined with biennial iFOBT). Colorectal cancer incidence (mortality) reductions for these strategies were 51-67(74-80)% in comparison with no screening; 2-yearly iFOBT screening (i.e. the NBCSP) would be associated with reductions of 51(74)%. Only 2-yearly iFOBT screening was found to be cost-effective in all scenarios in context of an indicative willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000/life-year saved (LYS); this strategy was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of A$2,984/LYS-A$5,981/LYS (depending on adherence). The fully rolled-out NBCSP is highly cost-effective, and is also one of the most effective approaches for bowel cancer screening in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D James B St John
- Prevention Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, and Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hooi C Ee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily He
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Grogan
- Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brenner H, Jansen L, Ulrich A, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M. Survival of patients with symptom- and screening-detected colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 7:44695-44704. [PMID: 27213584 PMCID: PMC5190129 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are diagnosed by screening rather than symptoms. Aims We aimed to assess and compare prognosis of patients with screen-detected CRC and symptom-detected CRC. Methods Overall and CRC specific mortality over a median follow-up of 4.8 years was assessed according to mode of diagnosis (symptoms, screening colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test [FOBT], other) in a multi-center cohort of 2,450 CRC patients aged 50-79 years recruited in Germany in 2003-2010. Results 68%, 11% and 10% were detected by symptoms, screening colonoscopy and FOBT, respectively. The screen-detected cancers had a more favorable stage distribution than the symptom-detected cancers (68% versus 50% in stage I or II). Age- and sex adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of total mortality with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) compared to symptom-detected cancers were 0.35 (0.24-0.50) and 0.36 (0.25-0.53) for screening colonoscopy and FOBT detected CRCs, respectively. HRs were only slightly attenuated and remained highly significant after adjustment for stage and multiple other covariates (0.50 (0.34-0.73) and 0.54 (0.37-0.80), respectively). Even stronger associations were seen for CRC specific mortality. Patients with screen-detected stage III CRC had as good CRC specific survival as patients with symptom-detected stage I or II CRC. Conclusions Patients with screen-detected CRC have a very good prognosis far beyond the level explained by their more favorable stage distribution. Mode of detection is an important, easy-to-obtain proxy indicator for favorable diagnosis beyond earlier stage at diagnosis and as such may be useful for risk stratification in treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Huang R, Chen Z, He L, He N, Xi Z, Li Z, Deng Y, Zeng X. Mass spectrometry-assisted gel-based proteomics in cancer biomarker discovery: approaches and application. Theranostics 2017; 7:3559-3572. [PMID: 28912895 PMCID: PMC5596443 DOI: 10.7150/thno.20797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a critical need for the discovery of novel biomarkers for early detection and targeted therapy of cancer, a major cause of deaths worldwide. In this respect, proteomic technologies, such as mass spectrometry (MS), enable the identification of pathologically significant proteins in various types of samples. MS is capable of high-throughput profiling of complex biological samples including blood, tissues, urine, milk, and cells. MS-assisted proteomics has contributed to the development of cancer biomarkers that may form the foundation for new clinical tests. It can also aid in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer. In this review, we discuss MS principles and instrumentation as well as approaches in MS-based proteomics, which have been employed in the development of potential biomarkers. Furthermore, the challenges in validation of MS biomarkers for their use in clinical practice are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongrong Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
| | - Zhongsi Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
| | - Lei He
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
| | - Nongyue He
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
- Economical Forest Cultivation and Utilization of 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center in Hunan Province, Hunan Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Application of Biological Nanotechnology; Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China
| | - Zhijiang Xi
- School of Medicine, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
| | - Zhiyang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Yan Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
- Economical Forest Cultivation and Utilization of 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center in Hunan Province, Hunan Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Application of Biological Nanotechnology; Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China
| | - Xin Zeng
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Medical Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210004, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Idigoras I, Arrospide A, Portillo I, Arana-Arri E, Martínez-Indart L, Mar J, de Koning HJ, Lastra R, Soto-Gordoa M, van der Meulen M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country (Spain) and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model. BMC Public Health 2017; 18:78. [PMID: 28764731 PMCID: PMC5540568 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4639-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract The population-based Basque Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Programme started in 2009 with a biennial immunochemical quantitative test (FIT) biennial and colonoscopy under sedation in positive cases. The population target of 586,700 residents was from 50 to 69 years old and the total coverage was reached at the beginning of 2014. The aim of our study was to determine possible scenarios in terms of incidence, mortality and reduction of Life-years-Lost (L-y-L) in the medium and long term of CRC. Methods Invitations were sent out by the Programme from 2009 to 2014, with combined organizational strategies. Simulation was done by MISCAN-colon (Microsimulation Screening Analysis) over 30 years comparing the results of screening vs no-screening, taking the population-based Cancer Registry into account. Lifetime population and real data from the Programme were used from 2008 to 2012. The model was run differentially for men and women. Results 924,416 invitations were sent out from 2009 to 2014. The average participation rate was 68.4%, CRC detection rate was 3.4% and the Advanced Adenoma detection rate was 24.0‰, with differences observed in sex and age. Future scenarios showed a higher decrease of incidence (17.2% vs 14.7%), mortality (28.1% vs 22.4%) and L-y-L (22.6% vs 18.4%) in men than women in 2030. Conclusions The Basque Country CRC Programme results are aligned to its strategy and comparable to other programmes. MISCAN model was found to be a useful tool to predict the benefits of the programme in the future. The effectiveness of the Programme has not been formally established as case control studies are required to determine long term benefits from the screening strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Idigoras
- Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, the Basque Health Service, Gran Vía, 62 - 4°, 48011, Bilbao, Spain. .,BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
| | - A Arrospide
- Gipuzkoa Primary Care - Integrated Health Care Organizations Research Unit. Alto Deba Integrated Health Care Organization, Gipuzkoa, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Mondragón, Spain.,Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian-, Donostia, Spain
| | - I Portillo
- Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, the Basque Health Service, Gran Vía, 62 - 4°, 48011, Bilbao, Spain.,BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - E Arana-Arri
- BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | | - J Mar
- Gipuzkoa Primary Care - Integrated Health Care Organizations Research Unit. Alto Deba Integrated Health Care Organization, Gipuzkoa, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Mondragón, Spain.,Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian-, Donostia, Spain
| | - H J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Lastra
- Department of Information Technologies, The Basque Health Service, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - M Soto-Gordoa
- Gipuzkoa Primary Care - Integrated Health Care Organizations Research Unit. Alto Deba Integrated Health Care Organization, Gipuzkoa, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Mondragón, Spain.,Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian-, Donostia, Spain
| | - M van der Meulen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lew JB, St John DJB, Xu XM, Greuter MJE, Caruana M, Cenin DR, He E, Saville M, Grogan P, Coupé VMH, Canfell K. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 2:e331-e340. [PMID: 29253458 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No assessment of the National Bowel Screening Program (NBCSP) in Australia, which considers all downstream benefits, costs, and harms, has been done. We aimed to use a comprehensive natural history model and the most recent information about cancer treatment costs to estimate long-term benefits, costs, and harms of the NBCSP (2 yearly immunochemical faecal occult blood testing screening at age 50-74 years) and evaluate the incremental effect of improved screening participation under different scenarios. METHODS In this modelling study, a microsimulation model, Policy1-Bowel, which simulates the development of colorectal cancer via both the conventional adenoma-carcinoma and serrated pathways was used to simulate the NBCSP in 2006-40, taking into account the gradual rollout of NBCSP in 2006-20. The base-case scenario assumed 40% screening participation (currently observed behaviour) and two alternative scenarios assuming 50% and 60% participation by 2020 were modelled. Aggregate year-by-year screening, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance-related costs, resource utilisation (number of screening tests and colonoscopies), and health outcomes (incident colorectal cancer cases and colorectal cancer deaths) were estimated, as was the cost-effectiveness of the NBCSP. FINDINGS With current levels of participation (40%), the NBCSP is expected to prevent 92 200 cancer cases and 59 000 deaths over the period 2015-40; an additional 24 300 and 37 300 cases and 16 800 and 24 800 deaths would be prevented if participation was increased to 50% and 60%, respectively. In 2020, an estimated 101 000 programme-related colonoscopies will be done, associated with about 270 adverse events; an additional 32 500 and 49 800 colonoscopies and 88 and 134 adverse events would occur if participation was increased to 50% and 60%, respectively. The overall number needed to screen (NNS) is 647-788 per death prevented, with 52-59 colonoscopies per death prevented. The programme is cost-effective due to the cancer treatment costs averted (cost-effectiveness ratio compared with no screening at current participation, AUS$3014 [95% uncertainty interval 1807-5583] per life-year saved) in the cost-effectiveness analysis. In the budget impact analysis, reduced annual expenditure on colorectal cancer control is expected by 2030, with expenditure reduced by a cumulative AUS$1·7 billion, AUS$2·0 billion, and AUS$2·1 billion (2015 prices) between 2030 and 2040, at participation rates of 40%, 50%, and 60%, respectively. INTERPRETATION The NBCSP has potential to save 83 800 lives over the period 2015-40 if coverage rates can be increased to 60%. By contrast, the associated harms, although an important consideration, are at a smaller magnitude at the population level. The programme is highly cost-effective and within a decade of full roll-out, there will be reduced annual health systems expenditure on colorectal cancer control due to the impact of screening. FUNDING Australia Postgraduate Award PhD Scholarship, Translational Cancer Research Network Top-up scholarship (supported by Cancer Institute NSW) and Cancer Council NSW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Bin Lew
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, NSW, Australia.
| | - D James B St John
- Prevention Division, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Xiang-Ming Xu
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, NSW, Australia
| | - Marjolein J E Greuter
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU Medical Center, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Caruana
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, NSW, Australia
| | - Dayna R Cenin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, WA, Australia; Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emily He
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, NSW, Australia
| | - Marion Saville
- Victorian Cytology Service Ltd, Carlton South, VIC, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul Grogan
- Advocacy, Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU Medical Center, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, NSW, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, NSW, Australia; School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Meester RG, Zauber AG, Doubeni CA, Jensen CD, Quinn VP, Helfand M, Dominitz JA, Levin TR, Corley DA, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1445-1451.e8. [PMID: 27211498 PMCID: PMC5028249 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Delays in diagnostic testing after a positive result from a screening test can undermine the benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but there are few empirical data on the effects of such delays. We used microsimulation modeling to estimate the consequences of time to colonoscopy after a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS We used an established microsimulation model to simulate an average-risk United States population cohort that underwent annual FIT screening (from ages 50 to 75 years), with follow-up colonoscopy examinations for individuals with positive results (cutoff, 20 μg/g) at different time points in the following 12 months. Main evaluated outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality; additional outcomes were total life-years lost and net costs of screening. RESULTS For individuals who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy within 2 weeks of a positive result from an FIT, the estimated lifetime risk of CRC incidence was 35.5/1000 persons, and mortality was 7.8/1000 persons. Every month added until colonoscopy was associated with a 0.1/1000 person increase in cancer incidence risk (an increase of 0.3%/month, compared with individuals who received colonoscopies within 2 weeks) and mortality risk (increase of 1.4%/month). Among individuals who received colonoscopy examinations 12 months after a positive result from an FIT, the incidence of CRC was 37.0/1000 persons (increase of 4%, compared with 2 weeks), and mortality was 9.1/1000 persons (increase of 16%). Total years of life gained for the entire screening cohort decreased from an estimated 93.7/1000 persons with an almost immediate follow-up colonoscopy (cost savings of $208 per patient, compared with no colonoscopy) to 84.8/1000 persons with follow-up colonoscopies at 12 months (decrease of 9%; cost savings of $100/patient, compared with no colonoscopy). CONCLUSIONS By using a microsimulation model of an average-risk United States screening cohort, we estimated that delays of up to 12 months after a positive result from an FIT can produce proportional losses of up to nearly 10% in overall screening benefits. These findings indicate the importance of timely follow-up colonoscopy examinations of patients with positive results from FITs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier G.S. Meester
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ann G. Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health in the Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology in the Perelman School of Medicine, and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics and Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | | | - Virginia P. Quinn
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Research & Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Mark Helfand
- Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Jason A. Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, United States,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|