Clinical guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease: Update of a French national consensus

Natural approaches for the management of ulcerative colitis: evidence of preclinical and clinical investigations

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a recurring autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation in the mucosal lining of the lower part of the large intestine. Conventional treatment options such as salicylates, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants often come with severe side effects, limited bioavailability, and the development of drug resistance, which hampers their therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, it is imperative to explore natural strategies as safe and alternative treatments for UC. Currently, around 40% of UC patients find relief through natural constituents, which can help reduce toxic side effects and maintain clinical remission. This review aims to provide a summary of both preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of various natural substances in the prophylaxis of UC. These natural options include plant extracts, essential oils, nutraceuticals, and phytochemicals. Furthermore, we will delve into the potential mechanisms that underlie the protective and curative actions of these novel herbal agents. In summary, this review will explore the effectiveness of natural remedies for UC, shedding light on their preclinical and clinical findings and the mechanisms behind their therapeutic actions. These alternatives offer hope for improved treatment outcomes and reduced side effects for individuals suffering from this challenging autoimmune condition.

The Effect of Protein Nutritional Support on Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Its Potential Mechanisms

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a complex chronic inflammatory bowel disorder that includes Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), has become a globally increasing health concern. Nutrition, as an important factor influencing the occurrence and development of IBD, has attracted more and more attention. As the most important nutrient, protein can not only provide energy and nutrition required by patients, but also help repair damaged intestinal tissue, enhance immunity, and thus alleviate inflammation. Numerous studies have shown that protein nutritional support plays a significant role in the treatment and remission of IBD. This article presents a comprehensive review of the pathogenesis of IBD and analyzes and summarizes the potential mechanisms of protein nutritional support in IBD. Additionally, it provides an overview of the clinical effects of protein nutritional support in IBD and its impact on clinical complications. Research findings reveal that protein nutritional support demonstrates significant benefits in improving clinical symptoms, reducing the risk of complications, and improving quality of life in IBD patients. Therefore, protein nutritional support is expected to provide a new approach for the treatment of IBD.

IBD Patients with Primary or Secondary Nonresponse to Ustekinumab Benefit from Dose Escalation or Reinduction

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of IBD. This drug has a well-established efficacy; however, patients may not respond or lose response. The availability of other biological therapies prompts the need for comparative data between different agents to suggest first- or second-line strategies. Aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab to other biologics in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as report the available data on dose escalation and reinduction. A systematic electronic search of the English literature was performed up to November 2023, using Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Conference proceedings were also screened. Out of 659 citations, 80 relevant articles were selected and included in the present narrative review. Head-to-head comparisons of different biological drugs are relatively scarce, mostly deriving from indirect comparison or retrospective studies. Overall available data indicate similar effectiveness in the treatment of IBD patients. Dose escalation and reinduction strategies are well documented, but the optimal treatment schedule is still to be defined. Response and remission rates vary in different studies, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical and endoscopic outcomes. However, both approaches are effective and safe in nonresponders and secondary loss of response. IBD patients may benefit from dose escalation or reinduction. Both strategies prove effective in regaining response in a proportion of patients, avoiding unnecessary early switch. Head-to-head trials are still needed to determine the exact placement of this drug compared to other biologics.

Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Proctitis Compared to Left Sided Colitis and Pancolitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative proctitis (UP), though associated with high symptom burden and poor quality of life, is excluded from most of the randomized controlled trials in UC, including the OCTAVE trials. We aimed to analyse the effectiveness of tofacitinib in UP, and compare it to that in left sided colitis (LSC) and pancolitis (PC).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients with either steroid-dependent or refractory ulcerative colitis, who received tofacitinib, were divided into three groups based on the disease extent [UP, LSC and PC]. The primary outcome was comparison of proportion of patients in clinical remission in the three groups, at weeks 8, 16 and 48. Safety outcomes were reported using incidence rate per patient year of exposure.

RESULTS

Clinical remission was achieved in 47%(15/32), 24%(23/94), and 43%(23/54) of patients at week 8, 56%(18/32), 37%(35/94), and 56%(30/54) of patients at week 16, and 59%(19/32), 38%(36/94), and 24%(13/54) of patients at week 48 in groups UP, LSC and PC, respectively. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were significantly higher in patients in groups UP at week 48. Five (15%) patients with UP were primary non-responders to tofacitinib at week 16, while three (9%) patients had secondary loss of response at week 48. The probability of sustained clinical response was highest in patients with UP. Patients with UP had the lowest incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of tofacitinib in inducing and maintaining clinical remission is greater in patients with UP compared to LSC and PC.

The role of geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor for postoperative outcomes in gastrointestinal emergencies

BACKGROUND

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple nutritional and inflammatory marker for older adults. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of the GNRI in older adults who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

This study included 206 older adults who had undergone emergency gastrointestinal surgery. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between the GNRI and postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. We then evaluated the association between GNRI and clinical variables among older adults undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, all complications occurred in 89 (43%) older adults, infectious in 53 (26%), and non-infectious in 36 (17%). In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.016), GNRI (p = 0.012), operative severity (p = 0.003), and operation time (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for all postoperative complications. While the GNRI (p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for infectious complications, age (p = 0.035) and bleeding volume (p = 0.035) were independent risk factors for postoperative non-infectious complications. In the low GNRI group, age (p = 0.029), serum C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.001), and proportion of sarcopenia (p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and the length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) was significantly longer than that in the high GNRI group. In Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the skeletal mass index and the GNRI had a positive correlation (r = 0.415 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The GNRI may be a predictor of postoperative infectious complications in older adults after emergency gastrointestinal surgery, suggesting the usefulness of the GNRI as a nutritional marker and sarcopenia-related parameter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

No. 22-16.

Causal association between inflammatory bowel disease and 32 site-specific extracolonic cancers: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The risk of extracolonic cancer is increased in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, but it is not clear whether there is a causal relationship. We aimed to systematically estimate the causal relationship between IBD and extracolonic cancers.

METHODS

Independent genetic variants strongly associated with IBD were extracted as instrumental variables from genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted by the International IBD Genetics Consortium including 12,882 IBD patients, 5956 Crohn's disease (CD) patients, and 6968 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Three sources of cancer GWAS were selected as outcome data. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to assess the causal effects of IBD on 32 extracolonic cancers. The meta-analysis was applied to assess the combined causal effect with multiple MR results.

RESULTS

IBD, CD, and UC have potential causal associations with oral cavity cancer (IBD: OR = 1.180, 95% CI: 1.059 to 1.316, P = 0.003; CD: OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.008 to 1.227, P = 0.034; UC: OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.041 to 1.288, P = 0.007). Meta-analysis showed a significant positive causal relationship between IBD and breast cancer (OR = 1.059; 95% CI: 1.033 to 1.086; P < 0.0001) as well as a potential causal relationship between CD and breast cancer (OR = 1.029; 95% CI: 1.002 to 1.055; P = 0.032) based on combining multiple MR results.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive MR analysis suggested that genetically predicted IBD, as well as its subtypes, may be a risk factor in the development of oral cavity and breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Few studies have thoroughly assessed the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate this association. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases were searched until April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of VDZ in the treatment of IBD were included. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for each outcome using a random effects model. A total of 12 RCTs, including 4,865 patients, met the inclusion criteria. In the induction phase, VDZ was more effective than placebo for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical remission (RR=2.09; 95% CI=1.66-2.62) and clinical response (RR=1.54; 95% CI=1.34-1.78). In the maintenance therapy group, VDZ reached higher clinical remission (RR=1.98; 95% CI=1.58-2.49) and clinical response (RR=1.78; 95% CI=1.40-2.26) rates compared with the placebo group. VDZ particularly improved clinical remission (RR=2.07; 95% CI=1.48-2.89) and clinical response (RR=1.84; 95% CI=1.54-2.21) in patients with TNF antagonist failure. In terms of corticosteroid-free remission, VDZ was also more effective than placebo in patients with IBD (RR=1.98; 95% CI=1.51-2.59). In Crohn's patients, VDZ was more effective than placebo in terms of mucosal healing (RR=1.78; 95% CI=1.27-2.51). With respect to adverse events, VDZ significantly reduced the risk of IBD exacerbation compared with the placebo (RR=0.60; 95% CI=0.39-0.93; P=0.023). However, when compared with the placebo, VDZ increased the risk of nasopharyngitis in patients with CD (RR=1.77; 95% CI=1.01-3.10; P=0.045). No significant differences in other adverse events were observed. Although there might be underlying risk, such as selection bias, in the present study it can be safely concluded that VDZ is a safe and effective biological agent for IBD, particularly for patients with TNF antagonist failure.

Defining the Failure of Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Advanced Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The expansion of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease created a lag between the development of these new therapies and their incorporation and use in daily practice. At present, no clear definitions for treatment optimization, treatment failure or criteria to abandon therapy are available. We aimed to centralize criteria for a nonresponse to all available molecules and to summarize guideline principles for treatment optimization.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported criteria for the treatment response to all advanced therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and tofacitinib) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

Across trials, criteria for a response of both patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are heterogenous. Investigators use different definitions for clinical and endoscopic remission, and endoscopic response and outcomes are assessed at variable time points. Current society guidelines provide heterogenous recommendations on treatment optimization. Most available data on loss of response concern anti-TNF molecules, and newer therapies are not included in the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The lack of clear definitions and formal recommendations provide the premise for empirical treatment strategies and premature abandonment of therapies.

Intra-abdominal abscesses in CD - When to treat with biologics?

Management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) is challenging. After initial drainage and antibiotherapy treatment, surgery with delayed intestinal resection is often recommended but new data suggests efficacy of biotherapies in this context. This review aims to summarize new data regarding efficacy and safety of anti-TNF in the management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating CD. We performed a review of the literature on medical management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating CD. After effective drainage of abscess, treatment with anti-TNF can allow resolving of abscess. In some patients and at a specific timing, the use of biotherapies could avoid delayed surgery and long-term abscess recurrence.

Comparative real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab for patients with ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There are currently no comparative data on the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) after anti-TNF therapy fails.

METHODS

We retrieved the full datasets of two observational, multicentre, retrospective studies of patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed and the patients were then treated with either vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission, treatment persistence, colectomy, hospitalization, and serious and infectious adverse events. Propensity scores weighted comparison was applied.

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients were included in the vedolizumab group and 97 were included in the ustekinumab group. At week 14 and week 52, in the weighted cohort, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for steroid-free clinical remission (OR = 0.55 [0.21-1.41], p = .21 and 0.94 [0.40-2.22], p = .89, respectively). There was no difference between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for secondary outcomes such as clinical remission, hospitalization, UC-related surgery, treatment persistence and serious and infectious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab after propensity scores weighted comparison. Further studies are required to determine predictive factors of the efficacy of both biological agents.

Therapeutic strategies in Crohn’s disease in an emergency surgical setting

Crohn’s disease (CD) remains a chronic, incurable disorder that presents unique challenges to the surgeon. Multiple factors must be considered to allow development of an appropriate treatment plan. Medical therapy often precedes or complements the surgical management. The indications for operative management of CD include acute and chronic disease complications and failed medical therapy. Elective surgery comes into play when patients are refractory to medical treatment if they have an obstructive phenotype. Toxic colitis, acute obstruction, perforation, acute abscess, or massive hemorrhage represent indications for emergency surgery. These patients are generally in critical conditions and present with intra-abdominal sepsis and a preoperative status of immunosuppression and malnutrition that exposes them to a higher risk of complications and mortality. A multidisciplinary team including surgeons, gastroenterologists, radiologists, nutritional support services, and enterostomal therapists are required for optimal patient care and decision making. Management of each emergency should be individualized based on patient age, disease type and duration, and patient goals of care. Moreover, the recurrent nature of disease mandates that we continue searching for innovative medical therapies and operative techniques that reduce the need to repeat surgical operations. In this review, we aimed to discuss the acute complications of CD and their treatment.

Swapping Versus Dose Optimization in Patients Losing Response to Adalimumab With Adequate Drug Levels

BACKGROUND

In cases of loss of response due to mechanistic failure under antitumor necrosis factor agents, it is recommended to switch to another class of biologics. Two different strategies were compared in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were treated with nonoptimized adalimumab (ADA) and experienced a loss of response despite therapeutic trough levels of adalimuma-either ADA dose optimization or switching to vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

METHODS

Patients under maintenance therapy with ADA monotherapy (40 mg every 14 days) and who experienced a secondary loss of response with trough levels > 4.9 μg/mL were included prospectively in this nonrandomized study. The primary end point was the survival rate without therapeutic discontinuation after ADA dose optimization or switching to another class of biologics.

RESULTS

Adalimumab was optimized (n = 61 patients, 42 Crohn's disease, 19 ulcerative colitis) or swapped for vedolizumab (n = 40, 20 ulcerative colitis) or ustekinumab (n = 30, 30 Crohn's disease). At 24 months, 11 out of 70 patients (14.8%) in the swap group discontinued treatment compared with 36 out of 61 (59.6%) patients in the optimization group (P < 0.001). The median time without therapeutic discontinuation was significantly longer in the swap group (>24 months) than in the optimization group (13.3 months, P < 0.001). In the optimization group, treatment discontinuation was positively associated with baseline fecal calprotectin >500 μg/g (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.16-10.72; P = 0.026) and inversely associated with variation of trough levels of adalimumab (>2 µg/mL from baseline to week 8 after optimization; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.13-0.82; P = 0.03). In the swap group, no factor was associated with treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class is better than optimizing ADA, which is, however, appropriate in a subgroup of patients.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment-Overview

This article is an overview of guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment of predominantly colonic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This overview describes the systematically and comprehensively multidisciplinary recommendations based on the updated principles of evidence-based literature to promote the adoption of best surgical practices and research as well as patient and specialized healthcare provider education. Colonic IBD represents idiopathic, chronic, inflammatory disorders encompassing Crohn's colitis (CC) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two unsolved medical subtypes of this condition, which present similarity in their clinical and histopathological characteristics. The standard state-of-the-art classification diagnostic steps are disease evaluation and assessment according to the Montreal classification to enable explicit communication with professionals. The signs and symptoms on first presentation are mainly connected with the anatomical localization and severity of the disease and less with the resulting diagnosis "CC" or "UC". This can clinically and histologically be non-definitive to interpret to establish criteria and is classified as indeterminate colitis (IC). Conservative surgical intervention varies depending on the disease phenotype and accessible avenues. The World Gastroenterology Organizations has, for this reason, recommended guidelines for clinical diagnosis and management. Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative treatment is ineffective (refractory), during intractable gastrointestinal hemorrhage, in obstructive gastrointestinal luminal stenosis (due to fibrotic scar tissue), or in the case of abscesses, peritonitis, or complicated fistula formation. The risk of colitis-associated colorectal cancer is realizable in IBD patients before and after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Therefore, endoscopic surveillance strategies, aimed at the early detection of dysplasia, are recommended. During the COVID-19 pandemic, IBD patients continued to be admitted for IBD-related surgical interventions. Virtual and phone call follow-ups reinforcing the continuity of care are recommended. There is a need for special guidelines that explore solutions to the groundwork gap in terms of access limitations to IBD care in developing countries, and the irregular representation of socioeconomic stratification needs a strategic plan for how to address this serious emerging challenge in the global pandemic.

A Study on Differences between Professional Endoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Endoscopic Detection and Standard Pathological Biopsy of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Objective

To assess whether professional endoscopists need additional training on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosis.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in patients with IBD, including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), which were diagnosed and treated for the first time in our hospital between January 2005 and December 2020. Doctors including gastroenterologists (group G) and professional endoscopists (group E) participated in the study. The data divided into CD or UC and group G or group E were compared.

Results

Patients with CD exhibited higher rates of terminal ileal lesions, reexamined colonoscopy within 6 months, and intestinal stenosis than patients with UC (P < 0.001). The positive endoscopic IBD diagnosis rate was significantly higher in group G than in group E (89.6% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis for patients with CD, the positive endoscopic IBD diagnosis rate was significantly higher for group G than for group E (81.5% vs. 41.8%, P < 0.001). However, the two groups exhibited no significant difference in the subgroup analysis for patients with UC (94.1% vs. 86.5%, P = 0.060). Group G exhibited a higher rate of terminal ileal intubation (83.1% vs. 65.3%, P < 0.001) and standard pathological biopsy (72.7% vs. 26.0%, P < 0.001) than Group E.

Conclusion

Professional endoscopists showed lower rates of terminal ileal intubation, positive endoscopic diagnosis, and standard pathological biopsy than gastroenterologists. Hence, additional training on IBD, particularly on CD, must be provided to professional endoscopists to increase their efficiency for terminal ileal intubation and positive endoscopic diagnosis and to enhance their awareness regarding standard biopsy.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Translational data suggest a potential role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy and safety of HBOT in IBD.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase and CENTRAL to identify studies reporting the efficacy of HBOT in ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. We pooled the response rates for HBOT in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease separately.

RESULTS

A total 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 16 in the analysis. The overall response rate of HBOT in ulcerative colitis was 83.24% (95% confidence interval: 61.90-93.82), while the response in Crohn's disease was 81.89 (76.72-86.11). The results of randomized trials for HBOT as adjuvant therapy in ulcerative colitis were conflicting. The complete healing of fistula in fistulizing Crohn's disease was noted 47.64% (22.05-74.54), while partial healing was noted in 34.29% (17.33-56.50%). Most of the adverse events were minor.

CONCLUSION

Observational studies suggest benefit of use of HBOT in ulcerative colitis flares and Crohn's disease. However, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to draw a definite conclusion.