Sgs1 and Exo1 suppress targeted chromosome duplication during ends-in and ends-out gene targeting

Gene duplication and deletion caused by over-replication at a fork barrier

Replication fork stalling can provoke fork reversal to form a four-way DNA junction. This remodelling of the replication fork can facilitate repair, aid bypass of DNA lesions, and enable replication restart, but may also pose a risk of over-replication during fork convergence. We show that replication fork stalling at a site-specific barrier in fission yeast can induce gene duplication-deletion rearrangements that are independent of replication restart-associated template switching and Rad51-dependent multi-invasion. Instead, they resemble targeted gene replacements (TGRs), requiring the DNA annealing activity of Rad52, the 3'-flap nuclease Rad16-Swi10, and mismatch repair protein Msh2. We propose that excess DNA, generated during the merging of a canonical fork with a reversed fork, can be liberated by a nuclease and integrated at an ectopic site via a TGR-like mechanism. This highlights how over-replication at replication termination sites can threaten genome stability in eukaryotes.

Unilateral ends-out gene targeting increases mistargeting through supporting extensive single-strand assimilation

Ends-out gene targeting enables the swapping of endogenous alleles with exogenous ones through homologous recombination which bears great implications both fundamental and applicable. To address the recombination mechanism(s) behind it, an experimental system was designed to distinguish between a possible (but rarely active) unilateral and the expected bilateral targeting in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in which the proportions of the two alternative genetic outcomes are conceived to mirror the probabilities of the two scenarios. The quantitative analysis showed that the bilateral targeting was expectedly predominant. However, an analogous comparative analysis on a different experimental set suggested a prevalence of unilateral targeting unveiling an uncertainty whether the extensively resected targeting modules only mimic unilateral invasion. Based on this, a comprehensive qualitative analysis was conducted revealing a single basic ends-out gene targeting mechanism composed of two intertwined pathways differing in the way how the homologous invasion is initiated and/or the production of the intermediates is conducted. This study suggests that bilateral targeting lowers mistargeting plausibly by limiting strand assimilation, unlike unilateral targeting which may initiate extensive strand assimilation producing intermediates capable of supporting multiple genetic outcomes which leads to mistargeting. Some of these outcomes can also be produced by mimicking unilateral invasion.

Repair of mismatched templates during Rad51-dependent Break-Induced Replication

Using budding yeast, we have studied Rad51-dependent break-induced replication (BIR), where the invading 3’ end of a site-specific double-strand break (DSB) and a donor template share 108 bp of homology that can be easily altered. BIR still occurs about 10% as often when every 6^th base is mismatched as with a perfectly matched donor. Here we explore the tolerance of mismatches in more detail, by examining donor templates that each carry 10 mismatches, each with different spatial arrangements. Although 2 of the 6 arrangements we tested were nearly as efficient as the evenly-spaced reference, 4 were significantly less efficient. A donor with all 10 mismatches clustered at the 3’ invading end of the DSB was not impaired compared to arrangements where mismatches were clustered at the 5’ end. Our data suggest that the efficiency of strand invasion is principally dictated by thermodynamic considerations, i.e., by the total number of base pairs that can be formed; but mismatch position-specific effects are also important. We also addressed an apparent difference between in vitro and in vivo strand exchange assays, where in vitro studies had suggested that at a single contiguous stretch of 8 consecutive bases was needed to be paired for stable strand pairing, while in vivo assays using 108-bp substrates found significant recombination even when every 6^th base was mismatched. Now, using substrates of either 90 or 108 nt–the latter being the size of the in vivo templates–we find that in vitro D-loop results are very similar to the in vivo results. However, there are still notable differences between in vivo and in vitro assays that are especially evident with unevenly-distributed mismatches. Mismatches in the donor template are incorporated into the BIR product in a strongly polar fashion up to ~40 nucleotides from the 3’ end. Mismatch incorporation depends on the 3’→ 5’ proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase δ, with little contribution from Msh2/Mlh1 mismatch repair proteins, or from Rad1-Rad10 flap nuclease or the Mph1 helicase. Surprisingly, the probability of a mismatch 27 nt from the 3’ end being replaced by donor sequence was the same whether the preceding 26 nucleotides were mismatched every 6^th base or fully homologous. These data suggest that DNA polymerase δ “chews back” the 3’ end of the invading strand without any mismatch-dependent cues from the strand invasion structure. However, there appears to be an alternative way to incorporate a mismatch at the first base at the 3’ end of the donor.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal forms of DNA damage and inaccurate repair of these breaks presents a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. Break-induced replication (BIR) is a homologous recombination pathway that results in a nonreciprocal translocation of chromosome ends. We used budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to investigate Rad51-mediated BIR, where the invading 3’ end of the DSB and a donor template share 108 bp of homology. We examined the tolerance of differently distributed mismatches on a homologous donor template. A donor with all 10 mismatches clustered every 6^th base at the 3’ invading end of the DSB was not impaired compared to arrangements where mismatches were clustered at the 5’ end. We also compared the efficiency of in vivo BIR with in vitro D-loop formation and find that for substrates of the same length, the tolerance for mismatches is comparable. However, there are still notable differences between in vivo and in vitro assays that are especially evident in substrates with unevenly-distributed mismatches. Mismatches are incorporated into the BIR product in a strongly polar fashion as far as about 40 nucleotides from the 3’ end, dependent on the 5’ to 3’ proofreading activity of DNA polymerase δ. Pol δ can “chew back” the 3’ end of the invading strand even when the sequences removed have no mismatches for the first 26 nucleotides. However, a mismatch at the first base can be removed from the 3’ end by another, unidentified mechanism.

Novel Approach in the Construction of Bioethanol-Producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hybrids§

Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates requires a producer strain that tolerates both the presence of growth and fermentation inhibitors and high ethanol concentrations. Therefore, we constructed heterozygous intraspecies hybrid diploids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by crossing two natural S. cerevisiae isolates, YIIc17_E5 and UWOPS87-2421, a good ethanol producer found in wine and a strain from the flower of the cactus Opuntia megacantha resistant to inhibitors found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, respectively. Hybrids grew faster than parental strains in the absence and in the presence of acetic and levulinic acids and 2-furaldehyde, inhibitors frequently found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, and the overexpression of YAP1 gene increased their survival. Furthermore, although originating from the same parental strains, hybrids displayed different fermentative potential in a CO₂ production test, suggesting genetic variability that could be used for further selection of desirable traits. Therefore, our results suggest that the construction of intraspecies hybrids coupled with the use of genetic engineering techniques is a promising approach for improvement or development of new biotechnologically relevant strains of S. cerevisiae. Moreover, it was found that the success of gene targeting (gene targeting fidelity) in natural S. cerevisiae isolates (YIIc17_E5α and UWOPS87-2421α) was strikingly lower than in laboratory strains and the most frequent off-targeting event was targeted chromosome duplication.

Noncanonical views of homology-directed DNA repair

DNA repair is essential to maintain genomic integrity and initiate genetic diversity. While gene conversion and classical nonhomologous end-joining are the most physiologically predominant forms of DNA repair mechanisms, emerging lines of evidence suggest the usage of several noncanonical homology-directed repair (HDR) pathways in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes in different contexts. Here we review how these alternative HDR pathways are executed, specifically focusing on the determinants that dictate competition between them and their relevance to cancers that display complex genomic rearrangements or maintain their telomeres by homology-directed DNA synthesis.

Telomere Dysfunction Triggers Palindrome Formation Independently of Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms

Inverted chromosome duplications or palindromes are linked with genetic disorders and malignant transformation. They are considered by-products of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair: the homologous recombination (HR) and the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Palindromes near chromosome ends are often triggered by telomere losses. An important question is to what extent their formation depends upon DSB repair mechanisms. Here we addressed this question using yeast genetics and comparative genomic hybridization. We induced palindrome formation by passaging cells lacking any form of telomere maintenance (telomerase and telomere recombination). Surprisingly, we found that DNA ligase 4, essential for NHEJ, did not make a significant contribution to palindrome formation induced by telomere losses. Moreover RAD51, important for certain HR-derived mechanisms, had little effect. Furthermore RAD52, which is essential for HR in yeast, appeared to decrease the number of palindromes in cells proliferating without telomeres. This study also uncovered an important role for Rev3 and Rev7 (but not for Pol32) subunits of polymerase ζ in the survival of cells undergoing telomere losses and forming palindromes. We propose a model called short-inverted repeat-induced synthesis in which DNA synthesis, rather than DSB repair, drives the inverted duplication triggered by telomere dysfunction.

Rif1 and Exo1 regulate the genomic instability following telomere losses

Telomere attrition is linked to cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and aging. This is because telomere losses trigger further genomic modifications, culminating with loss of cell function and malignant transformation. However, factors regulating the transition from cells with short telomeres, to cells with profoundly altered genomes, are little understood. Here, we use budding yeast engineered to lack telomerase and other forms of telomere maintenance, to screen for such factors. We show that initially, different DNA damage checkpoint proteins act together with Exo1 and Mre11 nucleases, to inhibit proliferation of cells undergoing telomere attrition. However, this situation changes when survivors lacking telomeres emerge. Intriguingly, checkpoint pathways become tolerant to loss of telomeres in survivors, yet still alert to new DNA damage. We show that Rif1 is responsible for the checkpoint tolerance and proliferation of these survivors, and that is also important for proliferation of cells with a broken chromosome. In contrast, Exo1 drives extensive genomic modifications in survivors. Thus, the conserved proteins Rif1 and Exo1 are critical for survival and evolution of cells with lost telomeres.