Topoisomerase I deficiency causes RNA polymerase II accumulation and increases AID abundance in immunoglobulin variable genes

The IgH Eµ-MAR regions promote UNG-dependent error-prone repair to optimize somatic hypermutation

Intoduction

Two scaffold/matrix attachment regions (5'- and 3'-MARs_Eµ ) flank the intronic core enhancer (cEµ) within the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IgH). Besides their conservation in mice and humans, the physiological role of MARs_Eµ is still unclear and their involvement in somatic hypermutation (SHM) has never been deeply evaluated.

Methods

Our study analyzed SHM and its transcriptional control in a mouse model devoid of MARs_Eµ , further combined to relevant models deficient for base excision repair and mismatch repair.

Results

We observed an inverted substitution pattern in of MARs_Eµ -deficient animals: SHM being decreased upstream from cEµ and increased downstream of it. Strikingly, the SHM defect induced by MARs_Eµ -deletion was accompanied by an increase of sense transcription of the IgH V region, excluding a direct transcription-coupled effect. Interestingly, by breeding to DNA repair-deficient backgrounds, we showed that the SHM defect, observed upstream from cEµ in this model, was not due to a decrease in AID deamination but rather the consequence of a defect in base excision repair-associated unfaithful repair process.

Discussion

Our study pointed out an unexpected "fence" function of MARs_Eµ regions in limiting the error-prone repair machinery to the variable region of Ig gene loci.

Ig Enhancers Increase RNA Polymerase II Stalling at Somatic Hypermutation Target Sequences

Somatic hypermutation (SHM) drives the genetic diversity of Ig genes in activated B cells and supports the generation of Abs with increased affinity for Ag. SHM is targeted to Ig genes by their enhancers (diversification activators [DIVACs]), but how the enhancers mediate this activity is unknown. We show using chicken DT40 B cells that highly active DIVACs increase the phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and Pol II occupancy in the mutating gene with little or no accompanying increase in elongation-competent Pol II or production of full-length transcripts, indicating accumulation of stalled Pol II. DIVAC has similar effect also in human Ramos Burkitt lymphoma cells. The DIVAC-induced stalling is weakly associated with an increase in the detection of ssDNA bubbles in the mutating target gene. We did not find evidence for antisense transcription, or that DIVAC functions by altering levels of H3K27ac or the histone variant H3.3 in the mutating gene. These findings argue for a connection between Pol II stalling and cis-acting targeting elements in the context of SHM and thus define a mechanistic basis for locus-specific targeting of SHM in the genome. Our results suggest that DIVAC elements render the target gene a suitable platform for AID-mediated mutation without a requirement for increasing transcriptional output.

Unfolding the Role of Splicing Factors and RNA Debranching in AID Mediated Antibody Diversification

Activated B-cells diversify their antibody repertoire via somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). SHM is restricted to the variable region, whereas, CSR is confined to the constant region of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is a crucial player in the diversification of antibodies in the activated B-cell. AID catalyzes the deamination of cytidine (C) into uracil (U) at Ig genes. Subsequently, low fidelity repair of U:G mismatches may lead to mutations. Transcription is essential for the AID action, as it provides a transient single-strand DNA substrate. Since splicing is a co-transcriptional event, various splicing factors or regulators influence the transcription. Numerous splicing factors are known to regulate the AID targeting, function, Ig transcription, and AID splicing, which eventually influence antibody diversification processes. Splicing regulator SRSF1-3, a splicing isoform of serine arginine-rich splicing factor (SRSF1), and CTNNBL1, a spliceosome interacting factor, interact with AID and play a critical role in SHM. Likewise, a splicing regulator polypyrimidine tract binding protein-2 (PTBP2) and the debranching enzyme (DBR1) debranches primary switch transcripts which later forms G-quadruplex structures, and the S region guide RNAs direct AID to S region DNA. Moreover, AID shows several alternate splicing isoforms, like AID devoid of exon-4 (AIDΔE4) that is expressed in various pathological conditions. Interestingly, RBM5, a splicing regulator, is responsible for the skipping of AID exon 4. In this review, we discuss the role and significance of splicing factors in the AID mediated antibody diversification.

Splicing regulator SRSF1-3 that controls somatic hypermutation of IgV genes interacts with topoisomerase 1 and AID

Somatic hypermutation (SHM) of Ig genes is initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and requires target gene transcription. A splice isoform of SRSF1, SRSF1-3, is necessary for AID-dependent SHM of IgV genes. Nevertheless, its exact molecular mechanism of action in SHM remains unknown. Our in silico studies show that, unlike SRSF1, SRSF1-3 lacks a strong nuclear localization domain. We show that the absence of RS domain in SRSF1-3 affects its nuclear localization, as compared to SRSF1. Consequently, SRSF1-3 is predominantly present in the cytoplasm. Remarkably, co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that SRSF1-3 interacts with Topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), a crucial regulator of SHM that assists in generating ssDNA for AID activity. Moreover, the immunofluorescence studies confirmed that SRSF1-3 and TOP1 are co-localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, Proximity Ligation Assay corroborated the direct interaction between SRSF1-3 and TOP1. An interaction between SRSF1-3 and TOP1 suggests that SRSF1-3 likely influences the TOP1 activity and consequently can aid in SHM. Accordingly, SRSF1-3 probably acts as a link between TOP1 and SHM, by spatially regulating TOP1 activity at the Ig locus. We also confirmed the interaction between SRSF1-3 and AID in chicken B-cells. Thus, SRSF1-3 shows dual-regulation of SHM, via interacting with AID as well as TOP1.

Topoisomerase I and Genome Stability: The Good and the Bad

Topoisomerase I (Top1) resolves torsional stress that accumulates during transcription, replication and chromatin remodeling by introducing a transient single-strand break in DNA. The cleavage activity of Top1 has opposing roles, either promoting or destabilizing genome integrity depending on the context. Resolution of transcription-associated negative supercoils, for example, prevents pairing of the nascent RNA with the DNA template (R-loops) as well as DNA secondary structure formation. Reduced Top1 levels thus enhance CAG repeat contraction, somatic hypermutation, and class switch recombination. Actively transcribed ribosomal DNA is also destabilized in the absence of Top1, reflecting the importance of Top1 in ensuring efficient transcription. In terms of promoting genome instability, an aborted Top1 catalytic cycle stimulates deletions at short tandem repeats and the enzyme's transesterification activity supports illegitimate recombination. Finally, Top1 incision at ribonucleotides embedded in DNA generates deletions in tandem repeats, and induces gross chromosomal rearrangements and mitotic recombination.

Physiological functions of programmed DNA breaks in signal-induced transcription

The idea that signal-dependent transcription might involve the generation of transient DNA nicks or even breaks in the regulatory regions of genes, accompanied by activation of DNA damage repair pathways, would seem to be counterintuitive, as DNA damage is usually considered harmful to cellular integrity. However, recent studies have generated a substantial body of evidence that now argues that programmed DNA single- or double-strand breaks can, at least in specific cases, have a role in transcription regulation. Here, we discuss the emerging functions of DNA breaks in the relief of DNA torsional stress and in promoter and enhancer activation.

Lingering Questions about Enhancer RNA and Enhancer Transcription-Coupled Genomic Instability

Intergenic and intragenic enhancers found inside topologically associated regulatory domains (TADs) express noncoding RNAs, known as enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Recent studies have indicated these eRNAs play a role in gene regulatory networks by controlling promoter and enhancer interactions and topology of higher-order chromatin structure. Misregulation of enhancer and promoter associated noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) could stabilize deleterious secondary DNA structures, noncoding RNA associated DNA/RNA hybrid formation, and promote collisions of transcription complexes with replisomes. It is revealing that many chromosomal aberrations, some associated with malignancies, are present inside enhancer and/or promoter sequences. Here, we expand on current concepts to discuss enhancer RNAs and enhancer transcription, and how enhancer transcription influences genomic organization and integrity.