Expanding molecular roles of UV-DDB: Shining light on genome stability and cancer

Thallium(I) induces a prolonged inhibition of (6-4)photoproduct binding and UV damage excision repair activities in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos via protein inactivation

Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) and (6-4)photoproduct (6-4 PP) are two major types of UV-induced DNA lesion and 6-4 PP is more mutagenic than CPD. Activated by lesion detection, nucleotide excision repair (NER) eliminates CPDs and 6-4 PPs. Thallium (Tl) is a toxic metal existing primarily as Tl+ in the aquatic environment. Ingestion of Tl+-contaminated foods and water is a major route of human poisoning. As Tl+ may inhibit enzyme activities via binding to sulfhydryl groups, this study explored if Tl+ could intensify UV mutagenicity by inactivating NER-linked damage recognition factors using zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo as a model system. Incubation of Tl+ (as thallium nitrate) at 0.1-0.4 μg/mL with zebrafish extracts for 20 min caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of 6-4 PP binding activities as shown by a photolesion-specific band shift assay, while CPD binding activities were insensitive to Tl+. The ability of Tl+ to suppress 6-4 PP detection was stronger than that of Hg2+. Exposure of zebrafish embryos at 1 h post fertilization (hpf) to Tl+ at 0.4-1 μg/mL for 9 or 71 h also specifically inhibited 6-4 PP detection, indicating that Tl+ induced a prolonged inhibition of 6-4 PP sensing ability primarily via its direct interaction with damage recognition molecules. Tl+-mediated inhibition of 6-4 PP binding in embryos at distinct stages resulted in a suppression of NER capacity monitored by a transcription-based DNA repair assay. Our results revealed the potential of Tl+ to enhance UV mutagenicity by disturbing the removal of 6-4 PP through repressing the lesion detection step of NER.

Pulse-SILAC and Interactomics Reveal Distinct DDB1-CUL4-Associated Factors, Cellular Functions, and Protein Substrates

Cullin-RING finger ligases represent the largest family of ubiquitin ligases. They are responsible for the ubiquitination of ∼20% of cellular proteins degraded through the proteasome, by catalyzing the transfer of E2-loaded ubiquitin to a substrate. Seven cullins are described in vertebrates. Among them, cullin 4 (CUL4) associates with DNA damage-binding protein 1 (DDB1) to form the CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex, which is involved in protein ubiquitination and in the regulation of many cellular processes. Substrate recognition adaptors named DDB1/CUL4-associated factors (DCAFs) mediate the specificity of CUL4-DDB1 and have a short structural motif of approximately forty amino acids terminating in tryptophan (W)-aspartic acid (D) dipeptide, called the WD40 domain. Using different approaches (bioinformatics/structural analyses), independent studies suggested that at least sixty WD40-containing proteins could act as adaptors for the DDB1/CUL4 complex. To better define this association and classification, the interaction of each DCAFs with DDB1 was determined, and new partners and potential substrates were identified. Using BioID and affinity purification-mass spectrometry approaches, we demonstrated that seven WD40 proteins can be considered DCAFs with a high confidence level. Identifying protein interactions does not always lead to identifying protein substrates for E3-ubiquitin ligases, so we measured changes in protein stability or degradation by pulse-stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture to identify changes in protein degradation, following the expression of each DCAF. In conclusion, these results provide new insights into the roles of DCAFs in regulating the activity of the DDB1-CUL4 complex, in protein targeting, and characterized the cellular processes involved.

The roles of non-productive complexes of DNA repair proteins with DNA lesions

A multitude of different types of lesions is continuously introduced into the DNA inside our cells, and their rapid and efficient repair is fundamentally important for the maintenance of genomic stability and cellular viability. This is achieved by a number of DNA repair systems that each involve different protein factors and employ versatile strategies to target different types of DNA lesions. Intriguingly, specialized DNA repair proteins have also evolved to form non-functional complexes with their target lesions. These proteins allow the marking of innocuous lesions to render them visible for DNA repair systems and can serve to directly recruit DNA repair cascades. Moreover, they also provide links between different DNA repair mechanisms or even between DNA lesions and transcription regulation. I will focus here in particular on recent findings from single molecule analyses on the alkyltransferase-like protein ATL, which is believed to initiate nucleotide excision repair (NER) of non-native NER target lesions, and the base excision repair (BER) enzyme hOGG1, which recruits the oncogene transcription factor Myc to gene promoters under oxidative stress.

UV-DDB as a General Sensor of DNA Damage in Chromatin: Multifaceted Approaches to Assess Its Direct Role in Base Excision Repair

Base excision repair (BER) is a cellular process that removes damaged bases arising from exogenous and endogenous sources including reactive oxygen species, alkylation agents, and ionizing radiation. BER is mediated by the actions of multiple proteins which work in a highly concerted manner to resolve DNA damage efficiently to prevent toxic repair intermediates. During the initiation of BER, the damaged base is removed by one of 11 mammalian DNA glycosylases, resulting in abasic sites. Many DNA glycosylases are product-inhibited by binding to the abasic site more avidly than the damaged base. Traditionally, apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1, APE1, was believed to help turn over the glycosylases to undergo multiple rounds of damaged base removal. However, in a series of papers from our laboratory, we have demonstrated that UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB) stimulates the glycosylase activities of human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1), MUTY DNA glycosylase (MUTYH), alkyladenine glycosylase/N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (AAG/MPG), and single-strand selective monofunctional glycosylase (SMUG1), between three- and five-fold. Moreover, we have shown that UV-DDB can assist chromatin decompaction, facilitating access of OGG1 to 8-oxoguanine damage in telomeres. This review summarizes the biochemistry, single-molecule, and cell biology approaches that our group used to directly demonstrate the essential role of UV-DDB in BER.

UV-DDB stimulates the activity of SMUG1 during base excision repair of 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine moieties

UV-damaged DNA-binding protein (UV-DDB) is a heterodimeric protein, consisting of DDB1 and DDB2 subunits, that works to recognize DNA lesions induced by UV damage during global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER). Our laboratory previously discovered a non-canonical role for UV-DDB in the processing of 8-oxoG, by stimulating 8-oxoG glycosylase, OGG1, activity 3-fold, MUTYH activity 4-5-fold, and APE1 (apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1) activity 8-fold. 5-hydroxymethyl-deoxyuridine (5-hmdU) is an important oxidation product of thymidine which is removed by single-strand selective monofunctional DNA glycosylase (SMUG1). Biochemical experiments with purified proteins indicated that UV-DDB stimulates the excision activity of SMUG1 on several substrates by 4-5-fold. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated that UV-DDB displaced SMUG1 from abasic site products. Single-molecule analysis revealed that UV-DDB decreases the half-life of SMUG1 on DNA by ∼8-fold. Immunofluorescence experiments demonstrated that cellular treatment with 5-hmdU (5 μM for 15 min), which is incorporated into DNA during replication, produces discrete foci of DDB2-mCherry, which co-localize with SMUG1-GFP. Proximity ligation assays supported a transient interaction between SMUG1 and DDB2 in cells. Poly(ADP)-ribose accumulated after 5-hmdU treatment, which was abrogated with SMUG1 and DDB2 knockdown. These data support a novel role for UV-DDB in the processing of the oxidized base, 5-hmdU.

PTEN-negative endometrial cancer cells protect their genome through enhanced DDB2 expression associated with augmented nucleotide excision repair

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) arises from uterine endometrium tissue and is the most prevalent cancer of the female reproductive tract in developed countries. It has been predicted that the global prevalence of EC will increase in part because of its positive association with economic growth and lifestyle. The majority of EC presented with endometrioid histology and mutations in the tumor suppressor gene PTEN, resulting in its loss of function. PTEN negatively regulates the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis of cell proliferation and thus serves as a tumorigenesis gatekeeper. Through its chromatin functions, PTEN is also implicated in genome maintenance procedures. However, our comprehension of how DNA repair occurs in the absence of PTEN function in EC is inadequate.

METHODS

We utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data analysis to establish a correlation between PTEN and DNA damage response genes in EC, followed by a series of cellular and biochemical assays to elucidate a molecular mechanism utilizing the AN3CA cell line model for EC.

RESULTS

The TCGA analyses demonstrated an inverse correlation between the expression of the damage sensor protein of nucleotide excision repair (NER), DDB2, and PTEN in EC. The transcriptional activation of DDB2 is mediated by the recruitment of active RNA polymerase II to the DDB2 promoter in the PTEN-null EC cells, revealing a correlation between increased DDB2 expression and augmented NER activity in the absence of PTEN.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated a causal relationship between NER and EC that may be exploited in disease management.

Susceptibility of DNA damage recognition activities linked to nucleotide excision and mismatch repair in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early and mid-early embryos to 2.5 to 4.5 °C heat stress

Fish at early life stages are sensitive to temperature change because of their narrower temperature tolerance ranges. Initiated by damage detection, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) maintain genome integrity respectively by eliminating mismatched nucleotides and helix-distorting DNA lesions. As discharge of heated effluent from power plants may elevate water temperatures to only 2 to 6 °C higher than ambient, this study explored if temperatures within this range affected MMR and NER-linked damage detection activities in fish embryos using zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo as a model organism. Exposure of early embryos at 10 h post fertilization (hpf) to a warmer temperature at + 4.5 °C for 30 min enhanced damage recognition activities targeting UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6-4) photoproducts (6-4PPs) that distorted helical structures. Conversely, photolesions sensing activities were inhibited in 24 hpf mid-early embryos under the same stress conditions. A much higher temperature at + 8.5 °C imposed similar effects on UV damage detection. A mild heat stress at + 2.5 °C for 30 min, however, repressed both CPD and 6-4PP binding activities in 10 and 24 hpf embryos. Inhibition of damage recognition under mild heat stress impeded the overall NER capacity evidenced by a transcription-based repair assay. Warmer water temperatures at + 2.5 and + 4.5 °C also inhibited G-T mismatch binding activities in 10 and 24 hpf embryos, but G-T recognition was more sensitive to + 4.5 °C stress. Inhibition of G-T binding partially correlated with a downregulation of Sp1 transcription factor activity. Our results showed the potential of water temperature elevation within 2 to 4.5 °C to disturb DNA damage repair in fish at embryonic stages.

Single-molecule analysis of DNA-binding proteins from nuclear extracts (SMADNE)

Single-molecule characterization of protein-DNA dynamics provides unprecedented mechanistic details about numerous nuclear processes. Here, we describe a new method that rapidly generates single-molecule information with fluorescently tagged proteins isolated from nuclear extracts of human cells. We demonstrated the wide applicability of this novel technique on undamaged DNA and three forms of DNA damage using seven native DNA repair proteins and two structural variants, including: poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP1), heterodimeric ultraviolet-damaged DNA-binding protein (UV-DDB), and 8-oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (OGG1). We found that PARP1 binding to DNA nicks is altered by tension, and that UV-DDB did not act as an obligate heterodimer of DDB1 and DDB2 on UV-irradiated DNA. UV-DDB bound to UV photoproducts with an average lifetime of 39 seconds (corrected for photobleaching, τc), whereas binding lifetimes to 8-oxoG adducts were < 1 second. Catalytically inactive OGG1 variant K249Q bound oxidative damage 23-fold longer than WT OGG1, at 47 and 2.0 s, respectively. By measuring three fluorescent colors simultaneously, we also characterized the assembly and disassembly kinetics of UV-DDB and OGG1 complexes on DNA. Hence, the SMADNE technique represents a novel, scalable, and universal method to obtain single-molecule mechanistic insights into key protein-DNA interactions in an environment containing physiologically-relevant nuclear proteins.

Cooperative interaction between AAG and UV-DDB in the removal of modified bases

UV-DDB is a DNA damage recognition protein recently discovered to participate in the removal of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG) by stimulating multiple steps of base excision repair (BER). In this study, we examined whether UV-DDB has a wider role in BER besides oxidized bases and found it has specificity for two known DNA substrates of alkyladenine glycosylase (AAG)/N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase (MPG): 1, N6-ethenoadenine (ϵA) and hypoxanthine. Gel mobility shift assays show that UV-DDB recognizes these two lesions 4-5 times better than non-damaged DNA. Biochemical studies indicated that UV-DDB stimulated AAG activity on both substrates by 4- to 5-fold. Native gels indicated UV-DDB forms a transient complex with AAG to help facilitate release of AAG from the abasic site product. Single molecule experiments confirmed the interaction and showed that UV-DDB can act to displace AAG from abasic sites. Cells when treated with methyl methanesulfonate resulted in foci containing AAG and UV-DDB that developed over the course of several hours after treatment. While colocalization did not reach 100%, foci containing AAG and UV-DDB reached a maximum at three hours post treatment. Together these data indicate that UV-DDB plays an important role in facilitating the repair of AAG substrates.

The role of UV-DDB in processing 8-oxoguanine during base excision repair

Recent data from our laboratory has shown that the nucleotide excision repair (NER) proteins UV-damaged DNA-binding protein (UV-DDB), xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC), and xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) play important roles in the processing of 8-oxoG. This review first discusses biochemical studies demonstrating how UV-DDB stimulates human 8-oxoG glycosylase (OGG1), MUTYH, and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease (APE1) to increase their turnover at damage sites. We further discuss our single-molecule studies showing that UV-DDB associates with these proteins at abasic moieties on DNA damage arrays. Data from cell experiments are then described showing that UV-DDB interacts with OGG1 at sites of 8-oxoG. Finally, since many glycosylases are inhibited from working on damage in the context of chromatin, we present a working model of how UV-DDB may be the first responder to alter the structure of damage containing-nucleosomes to allow access by base excision repair (BER) enzymes.

Aluminum (Al) causes a delayed suppression of nucleotide excision repair (NER) capacity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos via disturbance of DNA lesion detection

Aluminum (Al) is extensively used for making cooking utensils and its presence in the aquatic environment may occur through acid mine drainage and wastewater discharge. Al is known to induce genotoxicity in human cells, rodents, and fish. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) eliminates helix-twisting DNA lesions such as UV-induced dipyrimidine photoproducts. Because our earlier investigation revealed the operation of NER in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos, this study explored if inhibition of NER could be a mechanism of Al-induced genotoxicity using zebrafish embryo as a model system. An acute fish embryo toxicity test indicated that Al (as aluminum sulfate) at 2-15 mg/L were nonlethal to zebrafish embryos, yet exposure of embryos at 1 h post fertilization (hpf) to Al at 10-15 mg/L for 71 h significantly repressed their NER capacity monitored by a transcription-based DNA repair assay. Band shift analysis indicated a higher sensitivity of (6-4) photoproduct (6-4PP) than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) detecting activities to Al, reflecting the preferential influence of Al on the detection of strongly distorted DNA lesions. Time-course experiments showed a delayed response of NER to Al as repair machinery was unaffected by Al at 15 mg/L following a 35-h exposure, while Al treatment for the same period obviously inhibited 6-4PP binding activities although the gene expression of damage recognition factors remained active. Inhibition of 6-4PP detection blocked downstream lesion incision/excision detected by a terminal deoxy transferase-mediated end labeling assay. As the disturbance of damage sensing preceded that of the overall repair process, Al exposure was believed to downregulate NER capacity by inhibiting the activities of lesion detection proteins. Our results revealed the ability of Al to enhance its genotoxicity by suppressing NER capacity.

Global and transcription-coupled repair of 8-oxoG is initiated by nucleotide excision repair proteins

UV-DDB, consisting of subunits DDB1 and DDB2, recognizes UV-induced photoproducts during global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER). We recently demonstrated a noncanonical role of UV-DDB in stimulating base excision repair (BER) which raised several questions about the timing of UV-DDB arrival at 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), and the dependency of UV-DDB on the recruitment of downstream BER and NER proteins. Using two different approaches to introduce 8-oxoG in cells, we show that DDB2 is recruited to 8-oxoG immediately after damage and colocalizes with 8-oxoG glycosylase (OGG1) at sites of repair. 8-oxoG removal and OGG1 recruitment is significantly reduced in the absence of DDB2. NER proteins, XPA and XPC, also accumulate at 8-oxoG. While XPC recruitment is dependent on DDB2, XPA recruitment is DDB2-independent and transcription-coupled. Finally, DDB2 accumulation at 8-oxoG induces local chromatin unfolding. We propose that DDB2-mediated chromatin decompaction facilitates the recruitment of downstream BER proteins to 8-oxoG lesions.

Nucleotide excision repair proteins are involved in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage. Here, the authors show that NER proteins, DDB2, XPC, and XPA play a vital role in the 8-oxoguanine repair by coordinating with base excision repair protein OGG1.

Searching for DNA Damage: Insights From Single Molecule Analysis

DNA is under constant threat of damage from a variety of chemical and physical insults, such as ultraviolet rays produced by sunlight and reactive oxygen species produced during respiration or inflammation. Because damaged DNA, if not repaired, can lead to mutations or cell death, multiple DNA repair pathways have evolved to maintain genome stability. Two repair pathways, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER), must sift through large segments of nondamaged nucleotides to detect and remove rare base modifications. Many BER and NER proteins share a common base-flipping mechanism for the detection of modified bases. However, the exact mechanisms by which these repair proteins detect their damaged substrates in the context of cellular chromatin remains unclear. The latest generation of single-molecule techniques, including the DNA tightrope assay, atomic force microscopy, and real-time imaging in cells, now allows for nearly direct visualization of the damage search and detection processes. This review describes several mechanistic commonalities for damage detection that were discovered with these techniques, including a combination of 3-dimensional and linear diffusion for surveying damaged sites within long stretches of DNA. We also discuss important findings that DNA repair proteins within and between pathways cooperate to detect damage. Finally, future technical developments and single-molecule studies are described which will contribute to the growing mechanistic understanding of DNA damage detection.

Proteomic Analysis of Nuclear HBV rcDNA Associated Proteins Identifies UV-DDB as a Host Factor Involved in cccDNA Formation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) utilizes host DNA repair mechanisms to convert viral relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA) into a persistent viral genome, the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). To identify said host factors involved in cccDNA formation, we developed an unbiased approach to discover proteins involved in cccDNA formation by precipitating nuclear rcDNA from induced HepAD38 cells and identifying the co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry. The DNA damage binding protein 1 (DDB1) surfaced as a hit, coinciding with our previously reported shRNA screen in which shRNA-DDB1 in HepDES19 cells reduced cccDNA production. DDB1 binding to nuclear rcDNA was confirmed in HepAD38 cells via ChIP-qPCR. DDB1 and DNA damage binding protein 2 (DDB2) form the UV-DDB complex and the latter senses DNA damage to initiate the global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) pathway. To investigate the role of DDB complex in cccDNA formation, DDB2 was knocked out in HepAD38 and HepG2-NTCP cells. In both knockout cell lines, cccDNA formation was stunted significantly, and in HepG2-NTCP-DDB2 knockout cells, downstream indicators of cccDNA such as HBV RNA, HBcAg, and HBeAg were similarly reduced. Knockdown of DDB2 in HBV-infected HepG2-NTCP cells and primary human hepatocytes (PHH) also resulted in cccDNA reduction. Trans-complementation of wild type DDB2 in HepG2-NTCP-DDB2 knockout cells rescued cccDNA formation and its downstream indicators. However, ectopic expression of DDB2 mutants deficient in DNA-binding, DDB1-binding, or ubiquitination failed to rescue cccDNA formation. Our study thus suggests an integral role of UV-DDB, specifically DDB2, in the formation of HBV cccDNA. IMPORTANCE Serving as a key viral factor for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is formed in the cell nucleus from viral relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA) by hijacking host DNA repair machinery. Previous studies have identified a handful of host DNA repair factors involved in cccDNA formation through hypothesis-driven research with some help from RNAi screening and/or biochemistry approaches. To enrich the landscape of tools for discovering host factors responsible for rcDNA-to-cccDNA conversion, we developed an rcDNA immunoprecipitation paired mass spectrometry assay, which allowed us to pull down nuclear rcDNA in its transitional state to cccDNA and observe the associated host factors. From this assay we discovered a novel relationship between the UV-DDB complex and cccDNA formation, hence, providing a proof-of-concept for a more direct discovery of novel HBV DNA-host interactions that can be exploited to develop new cccDNA-targeting antivirals.

Single molecule analysis indicates stimulation of MUTYH by UV-DDB through enzyme turnover

The oxidative base damage, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) is a highly mutagenic lesion because replicative DNA polymerases insert adenine (A) opposite 8-oxoG. In mammalian cells, the removal of A incorporated across from 8-oxoG is mediated by the glycosylase MUTYH during base excision repair (BER). After A excision, MUTYH binds avidly to the abasic site and is thus product inhibited. We have previously reported that UV-DDB plays a non-canonical role in BER during the removal of 8-oxoG by 8-oxoG glycosylase, OGG1 and presented preliminary data that UV-DDB can also increase MUTYH activity. In this present study we examine the mechanism of how UV-DDB stimulates MUTYH. Bulk kinetic assays show that UV-DDB can stimulate the turnover rate of MUTYH excision of A across from 8-oxoG by 4-5-fold. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and atomic force microscopy suggest transient complex formation between MUTYH and UV-DDB, which displaces MUTYH from abasic sites. Using single molecule fluorescence analysis of MUTYH bound to abasic sites, we show that UV-DDB interacts directly with MUTYH and increases the mobility and dissociation rate of MUTYH. UV-DDB decreases MUTYH half-life on abasic sites in DNA from 8800 to 590 seconds. Together these data suggest that UV-DDB facilitates productive turnover of MUTYH at abasic sites during 8-oxoG:A repair.

DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy

Genomic instability is the hallmark of various cancers with the increasing accumulation of DNA damage. The application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in cancer treatment is typically based on this property of cancers. However, the adverse effects including normal tissues injury are also accompanied by the radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Targeted cancer therapy has the potential to suppress cancer cells' DNA damage response through tailoring therapy to cancer patients lacking specific DNA damage response functions. Obviously, understanding the broader role of DNA damage repair in cancers has became a basic and attractive strategy for targeted cancer therapy, in particular, raising novel hypothesis or theory in this field on the basis of previous scientists' findings would be important for future promising druggable emerging targets. In this review, we first illustrate the timeline steps for the understanding the roles of DNA damage repair in the promotion of cancer and cancer therapy developed, then we summarize the mechanisms regarding DNA damage repair associated with targeted cancer therapy, highlighting the specific proteins behind targeting DNA damage repair that initiate functioning abnormally duo to extrinsic harm by environmental DNA damage factors, also, the DNA damage baseline drift leads to the harmful intrinsic targeted cancer therapy. In addition, clinical therapeutic drugs for DNA damage and repair including therapeutic effects, as well as the strategy and scheme of relative clinical trials were intensive discussed. Based on this background, we suggest two hypotheses, namely "environmental gear selection" to describe DNA damage repair pathway evolution, and "DNA damage baseline drift", which may play a magnified role in mediating repair during cancer treatment. This two new hypothesis would shed new light on targeted cancer therapy, provide a much better or more comprehensive holistic view and also promote the development of new research direction and new overcoming strategies for patients.

The Multiple Cellular Roles of SMUG1 in Genome Maintenance and Cancer

Single-strand selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1) works to remove uracil and certain oxidized bases from DNA during base excision repair (BER). This review provides a historical characterization of SMUG1 and 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (5-hmdU) one important substrate of this enzyme. Biochemical and structural analyses provide remarkable insight into the mechanism of this glycosylase: SMUG1 has a unique helical wedge that influences damage recognition during repair. Rodent studies suggest that, while SMUG1 shares substrate specificity with another uracil glycosylase UNG2, loss of SMUG1 can have unique cellular phenotypes. This review highlights the multiple roles SMUG1 may play in preserving genome stability, and how the loss of SMUG1 activity may promote cancer. Finally, we discuss recent studies indicating SMUG1 has moonlighting functions beyond BER, playing a critical role in RNA processing including the RNA component of telomerase.

Cellular response to endogenous DNA damage: DNA base modifications in gene expression regulation

The integrity of the genetic information is continuously challenged by numerous genotoxic insults, most frequently in the form of oxidation, alkylation or deamination of the bases that result in DNA damage. These damages compromise the fidelity of the replication, and interfere with the progression and function of the transcription machineries. The DNA damage response (DDR) comprises a series of strategies to deal with DNA damage, including transient transcriptional inhibition, activation of DNA repair pathways and chromatin remodeling. Coordinated control of transcription and DNA repair is required to safeguardi cellular functions and identities. Here, we address the cellular responses to endogenous DNA damage, with a particular focus on the role of DNA glycosylases and the Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway, in conjunction with the DDR factors, in responding to DNA damage during the transcription process. We will also discuss functions of newly identified epigenetic and regulatory marks, such as 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and its oxidative products and 8-oxoguanine, that were previously considered only as DNA damages. In light of these resultsthe classical perception of DNA damage as detrimental for cellular processes are changing. and a picture emerges whereDNA glycosylases act as dynamic regulators of transcription, placing them at the intersection of DNA repair and gene expression modulation.

The involvement of nucleotide excision repair proteins in the removal of oxidative DNA damage

The six major mammalian DNA repair pathways were discovered as independent processes, each dedicated to remove specific types of lesions, but the past two decades have brought into focus the significant interplay between these pathways. In particular, several studies have demonstrated that certain proteins of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER) pathways work in a cooperative manner in the removal of oxidative lesions. This review focuses on recent data showing how the NER proteins, XPA, XPC, XPG, CSA, CSB and UV-DDB, work to stimulate known glycosylases involved in the removal of certain forms of base damage resulting from oxidative processes, and also discusses how some oxidative lesions are probably directly repaired through NER. Finally, since many glycosylases are inhibited from working on damage in the context of chromatin, we detail how we believe UV-DDB may be the first responder in altering the structure of damage containing-nucleosomes, allowing access to BER enzymes.

A novel DDB2 mutation causes defective recognition of UV-induced DNA damages and prevalent equine squamous cell carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) occurs frequently in the human Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP) syndrome and is characterized by deficient UV-damage repair. SCC is the most common equine ocular cancer and the only associated genetic risk factor is a UV-damage repair protein. Specifically, a missense mutation in horse DDB2 (T338M) was strongly associated with both limbal SCC and third eyelid SCC in three breeds of horses (Halflinger, Belgian, and Rocky Mountain Horses) and was hypothesized to impair binding to UV-damaged DNA. Here, we investigate DDB2-T338M mutant's capacity to recognize UV lesions in vitro and in vivo, together with human XP mutants DDB2-R273H and -K244E. We show that the recombinant DDB2-T338M assembles with DDB1, but fails to show any detectable binding to DNA substrates with or without UV lesions, due to a potential structural disruption of the rigid DNA recognition β-loop. Consistently, we demonstrate that the cellular DDB2-T338M is defective in its recruitment to focally radiated DNA damages, and in its access to chromatin. Thus, we provide direct functional evidence indicating the DDB2-T338M recapitulates molecular defects of human XP mutants, and is the causal loss-of-function allele that gives rise to equine ocular SCCs. Our findings shed new light on the mechanism of DNA recognition by UV-DDB and on the initiation of ocular malignancy.

Dynamic action of DNA repair proteins as revealed by single molecule techniques: Seeing is believing

DNA repair is a highly dynamic process in which the actual damage recognition process occurs through an amazing dance between the DNA duplex containing the lesion and the DNA repair proteins. Single molecule investigations have revealed that DNA repair proteins solve the speed-stability paradox, of rapid search versus stable complex formation, by conformational changes induced in both the damaged DNA and the repair proteins. Using Rad4, XPA, PARP1, APE1, OGG1 and UV-DDB as examples, we have discovered how these repair proteins limit their travel on DNA, once a lesion is encountered through a process of anomalous diffusion. We have also observed how PARP1 and APE1, as well as UV-DDB and OGG1 or APE1, co-localize dynamically at sites near DNA damage. This review highlights how our group has greatly benefited from our productive collaborations with Sam Wilson's research group.