Leptin infusion during the early luteal phase in ewes does not affect progesterone production

New Aspects of Corpus Luteum Regulation in Physiological and Pathological Conditions: Involvement of Adipokines and Neuropeptides

The corpus luteum is a small gland of great importance because its proper functioning determines not only the appropriate course of the estrous/menstrual cycle and embryo implantation, but also the subsequent maintenance of pregnancy. Among the well-known regulators of luteal tissue functions, increasing attention is focused on the role of neuropeptides and adipose tissue hormones—adipokines. Growing evidence points to the expression of these factors in the corpus luteum of women and different animal species, and their involvement in corpus luteum formation, endocrine function, angiogenesis, cells proliferation, apoptosis, and finally, regression. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge about the expression and role of adipokines, such as adiponectin, leptin, apelin, vaspin, visfatin, chemerin, and neuropeptides like ghrelin, orexins, kisspeptin, and phoenixin in the physiological regulation of the corpus luteum function, as well as their potential involvement in pathologies affecting the luteal cells that disrupt the estrous cycle.

Direct effects of leptin and adiponectin on peripheral reproductive tissues: a critical review

Obesity is a risk factor for infertility and adverse reproductive outcomes. Adipose tissue is an important endocrine gland that secretes a host of endocrine factors, called adipokines, which modulate diverse physiologic processes including appetite, metabolism, cardiovascular function, immunity and reproduction. Altered adipokine expression in obese individuals has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a host of health disorders including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. It remains unclear whether adipokines play a significant role in the pathogenesis of adverse reproductive outcomes in obese individuals and, if so, whether the adipokines are acting directly or indirectly on the peripheral reproductive tissues. Many groups have demonstrated that receptors for the adipokines leptin and adiponectin are expressed in peripheral reproductive tissues and that these adipokines are likely, therefore, to exert direct effects on these tissues. Many groups have tested for direct effects of leptin and adiponectin on reproductive tissues including the testis, ovary, uterus, placenta and egg/embryo. The hypothesis that decreased fertility potential or adverse reproductive outcomes may result, at least in part, from defects in adipokine signaling within reproductive tissues has also been tested. Here, we present a critical analysis of published studies with respect to two adipokines, leptin and adiponectin, for which significant data have been generated. Our evaluation reveals significant inconsistencies and methodological limitations regarding the direct effects of these adipokines on peripheral reproductive tissues. We also observe a pervasive failure to account for in vivo data that challenge observations made in vitro. Overall, while leptin and adiponectin may directly modulate peripheral reproductive tissues, existing data suggest that these effects are minor and non-essential to human or mouse reproductive function. Current evidence suggests that direct effects of leptin or adiponectin on peripheral reproductive tissues are unlikely to factor significantly in the adverse reproductive outcomes observed in obese individuals.

The effect of systemic and ovarian infusion of glucose, galactose and fructose on ovarian function in sheep

Glucose is a critical metabolic fuel in most mammals although many foodstuffs also contain high levels of the monosaccharides, galactose and fructose. The aims of this work were to determine the insulin response to challenges of these sugars (experiment 1) and to examine the effect of systemic (experiment 2) and direct ovarian (experiment 3) infusion of these monosaccharides on ovarian function in ewes with autotransplanted ovaries. In experiment 1, both fructose (fourfold increase peaking in 2 h) and galactose (twofold increase; 30 min) elicited markedly different (P<0.001) insulin responses than glucose (sevenfold increase; 20 min) although the total amount released following fructose and glucose challenge was similar. In experiment 2, low-dose systemic fructose infusion had no acute effect on insulin but did depress FSH (P<0.05), and following the end of fructose infusion, a transient increase in FSH and insulin was observed (P<0.05), which was associated with an increase (P<0.05) in ovarian oestradiol and androstenedione secretion. Systemic infusion of neither glucose nor galactose had a significant effect on ovarian steroidogenesis although glucose acutely suppressed insulin levels. In contrast, ovarian arterial infusion of fructose and glucose had no effect on ovarian function whereas galactose suppressed ovarian follicle number and steroid secretion (P<0.05). In conclusion, this work indicates that fructose and galactose can influence ovarian functionin vivoin sheep and that different mechanisms are involved. Thus, fructose exerts stimulatory effects through indirect modulation of peripheral insulin and/or gonadotrophin levels whereas galactose exerts primarily suppressive effects by direct actions on the ovary.