Histamine H4 receptor antagonists for the treatment of inflammatory disorders

Novel Targets and Drug Delivery System in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain: Recent Studies and Clinical Advancement

Pain is generated by a small number of peripheral targets. These can be made more sensitive by inflammatory mediators. The number of opioids prescribed to the patients can be reduced dramatically with better pain management. Any therapy that safely and reliably provides extended analgesia and is flexible enough to facilitate a diverse array of release profiles would be useful for improving patient comfort, quality of care, and compliance after surgical procedures. Comparisons are made between new and traditional methods, and the current state of development has been discussed; taking into account the availability of molecular and cellular level data, preclinical and clinical data, and early post-market data. There are a number of benefits associated with the use of nanotechnology in the delivery of analgesics to specific areas of the body. Nanoparticles are able to transport drugs to inaccessible bodily areas because of their small molecular size. This review focuses on targets that act specifically or primarily on sensory neurons, as well as inflammatory mediators that have been shown to have an analgesic effect as a side effect of their anti- inflammatory properties. New, regulated post-operative pain management devices that use existing polymeric systems were presented in this article, along with the areas for potential development. Analgesic treatments, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, have also been discussed.

Adriforant is a functional antagonist of histamine receptor 4 and attenuates itch and skin inflammation in mice

BACKGROUND

Histamine has been postulated to play a role in atopic dermatitis via histamine receptor 4, mediating pruritic and inflammatory effects. The H4R antagonist adriforant (PF-3893787 or ZPL389) indicated clinical efficacy in a Ph2a study in atopic dermatitis. Preclinical investigations of adriforant had been scarce as experiments in transfectants with H4R from several species suggested partial agonism, not seen in human cells.

OBJECTIVE

During the Ph2b trial in AD, we performed experiments to understand the pharmacology of adriforant in primary murine cells and in vivo models. We assessed its effects on ERK phosphorylation and transcriptional changes in bone marrow-derived mast cells, histamine-dependent Ca²⁺ flux in neurons and histamine-induced itch response. In addition, its impact on MC903-induced skin inflammation was evaluated.

RESULTS

We show that, contrary to transfectants, adriforant is a competitive antagonist of the murine histamine receptor 4, antagonizes histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation, normalizes histamine-induced transcriptional changes in mast cells and reduces histamine-dependent Ca²⁺ flux in neurons. Administration to mice reduces acute histamine-induced itch response. In addition, adriforant ameliorates inflammation in the mouse MC903 model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that functional inhibition of histamine receptor 4 by adriforant reduces itch and inflammation in vivo. The effects observed in mice, however, did not translate to clinical efficacy in patients as the Ph2b clinical trial with adriforant did not meet pre-specified efficacy endpoints. Given the complex pathogenesis of AD, antagonism of histamine receptor 4 alone appears insufficient to reduce disease severity in AD patients, despite the effects seen in mouse models.

Food Intolerance: The Role of Histamine

Histamine is a natural amine derived from L-histidine. Although it seems that our knowledge about this molecule is wide and diverse, the importance of histamine in many regulatory processes is still enigmatic. The interplay between different types of histamine receptors and the compound may cause ample effects, including histamine intoxication and so-called histamine intolerance or non-allergic food intolerance, leading to disturbances in immune regulation, manifestation of gastroenterological symptoms, and neurological diseases. Most cases of clinical manifestations of histamine intolerance are non-specific due to tissue-specific distribution of different histamine receptors and the lack of reproducible and reliable diagnostic markers. The diagnosis of histamine intolerance is fraught with difficulties, in addition to challenges related to the selection of a proper treatment strategy, the regular course of recovery, and reduced amelioration of chronic symptoms due to inappropriate treatment prescription. Here, we reviewed a history of histamine uptake starting from the current knowledge about its degradation and the prevalence of histamine precursors in daily food, and continuing with the receptor interactions after entering and the impacts on the immune, central nervous, and gastrointestinal systems. The purpose of this review is to build an extraordinarily specific method of histamine cycle assessment in regard to non-allergic intolerance and its possible dire consequences that can be suffered.

Prognostic value of immune-related cells and genes in the tumor microenvironment of ovarian cancer, especially CST4

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most common gynecological malignant tumor with the highest mortality rate. However, identification of effective immune therapeutic targets and biomarkers are beset by many challenges. CIBERSORT was used to calculate the abundance of 22 immune cell types in 379 OC samples, and indicated that three immune cell types were associated with poor prognoses. Further analysis revealed that 17 hub genes were associated with these three cell types. We screened differentially expressed immune-related prognostic gene associated with clinicopathological factors, which was CST4. We used clinical specimens to detect the expression of CST4, and determined that CST4 was both highly expressed in OC patients and associated with poor prognoses. Our findings indicated that infiltration of immune cells affected the survival of patients with OC, provided therapeutic targets represented by CST4, deepened our understanding of the immune microenvironment of OC, and enhanced the theoretical basis of immunotherapy.

Novel Analgesics with Peripheral Targets

A limited number of peripheral targets generate pain. Inflammatory mediators can sensitize these. The review addresses targets acting exclusively or predominantly on sensory neurons, mediators involved in inflammation targeting sensory neurons, and mediators involved in a more general inflammatory process, of which an analgesic effect secondary to an anti-inflammatory effect can be expected. Different approaches to address these systems are discussed, including scavenging proinflammatory mediators, applying anti-inflammatory mediators, and inhibiting proinflammatory or facilitating anti-inflammatory receptors. New approaches are contrasted to established ones; the current stage of progress is mentioned, in particular considering whether there is data from a molecular and cellular level, from animals, or from human trials, including an early stage after a market release. An overview of publication activity is presented, considering a IuPhar/BPS-curated list of targets with restriction to pain-related publications, which was also used to identify topics.

Enigmatic Histamine Receptor H4 for Potential Treatment of Multiple Inflammatory, Autoimmune, and Related Diseases

The histamine H4 receptor, belonging to the family of G-protein coupled receptors, is an increasingly attractive drug target. It plays an indispensable role in many cellular pathways, and numerous H4R ligands are being studied for the treatment of several inflammatory, allergic, and autoimmune disorders, including pulmonary fibrosis. Activation of H4R is involved in cytokine production and mediates mast cell activation and eosinophil chemotaxis. The importance of this receptor has also been shown in inflammatory models: peritonitis, respiratory tract inflammation, colitis, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Recent studies suggest that H4R acts as a modulator in cancer, neuropathic pain, vestibular disorders, and type-2 diabetes, however, its role is still not fully understood.

An overview of drug discovery efforts for eczema: why is this itch so difficult to scratch?

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a type of allergic/inflammatory dermatitis characterized by itch and an impairment in quality of life.Areas covered: Herein, the authors review drug discovery efforts for AD, highlighting the clinical efficacy of novel drugs, with a particular focus on the relief of pruritus. Topical agents include emollients, topical antihistamines, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors and herbs. Recently, topical phosphodiesterase E4 (PDE4) inhibitors like crisaborole have become available and are efficacious for mild to moderate AD with few side effects. For more severe AD, monoclonal antibodies like dupilumab are considered as efficacious subcutaneous treatment options. In severe and recalcitrant AD, systemic treatment can ameliorate AD symptoms.Expert opinion: Many topical and systemic medications have demonstrated therapeutic benefits for AD. Indeed, randomized trials have shown that topical PDE4 inhibitors and subcutaneous dupilumab are safe and efficacious. Objective tools to evaluate itch and gauge treatment efficacy is important, but current methodology relies primarily on clinical scores. AD is a systemic atopic disease with a lot of complicated psychosocial issues. Suboptimal efficacy is often due to poor compliance and unrealistic expectation of curative treatment, rendering treatment difficult despite the existence of effective medications.

Efficacy and safety of the histamine H4 receptor antagonist ZPL-3893787 in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

H₄ receptor antagonists are potential novel treatments for inflammatory skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study the efficacy and safety of ZPL-3893787 (a selective H₄ receptor antagonist) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate ZPL-3893787 (30 mg) once-daily oral therapy in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized (2:1) to ZPL-3893787 (n = 65) or placebo (n = 33) for 8 weeks. Patients had a history of AD for more than 12 months, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores of 12 or greater and 48 or less, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores of 3 or greater, pruritus scores of 5 or greater (0- to 10-point scale), and AD on 10% or greater of body surface area. Efficacy parameters included EASI, IGA, SCORAD, and pruritus assessment.

RESULTS

Treatment with oral ZPL-3893787 showed a 50% reduction in EASI score compared with 27% for placebo. The placebo-adjusted reduction in EASI score at week 8 was 5.1 (1-sided P = .01). Clear or almost-clear IGA scores were 18.5% with ZPL-3893787 versus 9.1% with placebo. SCORAD scores exhibited 41% reduction with ZPL-3893787 versus 26% with placebo (placebo-adjusted reduction of 10.0, P = .004). There was a 3-point reduction (scale, 1-10) in pruritus with ZPL-3893787, but there was a similar reduction with placebo, resulting in a nonsignificant difference (P = .249). Patient-reported pruritus subscores obtained from SCORAD were reduced with ZPL-3893787 compared with placebo at week 8 (nonsignificant). ZPL-3893787 was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, these results showed that ZPL-3893787 improved inflammatory skin lesions in patients with AD, confirming H₄ receptor antagonism as a novel therapeutic option.

Markers of anaphylaxis - a systematic review

Anaphylaxis is defined as severe, life-threatening, systemic or general, immediate reaction of hypersensitivity, with repeatable symptoms caused by the dose of stimulus which is well tolerated by healthy persons. The proper diagnosis, immediate treatment and differential diagnosis are crucial for saving patient's life. However, anaphylaxis is relatively frequently misdiagnosed or confused with other clinical entities. Thus, there is a continuous need for identifying detectable markers improving the proper diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Here we presented currently known markers of anaphylaxis and discussed in more detail the most clinically valuable ones: tryptase, platelet activacting factor (PAF), PAF-acethylhydrolase, histamine and its metabolites.

Histamine H4 receptor mediates chemotaxis of human lung mast cells

The diverse effects of histamine are mediated by discrete histamine receptors. The principal repository of histamine in the body is the mast cell. However, the effects of histamine on mast cells, especially those of human origin, have not been fully elucidated. In this study, the expression of histamine receptors in human lung mast cells was evaluated. Moreover, the effects of histamine receptor engagement on both mediator release and chemotaxis were investigated. Mast cells were isolated and purified from human lung tissue. Histamine receptor expression was determined by RT-PCR and q-PCR. Both methods for the detection of histamine receptors were in accordance and human lung mast cells expressed mRNA for histamine H₄ and histamine H₁ receptors, variably expressed histamine H₂ receptor but did not express histamine H₃ receptor. The effects of selective histamine receptor agonists on the release of both pre-formed (histamine) and newly-synthesised (cysteinyl-leukotriene, prostaglandin D₂) mediators were investigated. None of the agonists tested had any direct effects on mediator release. None of the agonists modulated release stimulated by anti-IgE. Further studies showed that histamine induced migration of mast cells. Chemotaxis appeared to be mediated by the histamine H₄ receptor since JNJ28610244 (H₄ agonist) was chemotactic for mast cells whereas 2-(2-pyridyl) ethylamine (H₁ agonist) was not. Furthermore, the selective histamine H₄ receptor antagonist, JNJ7777120, effectively reversed the chemotaxis of mast cells induced by JNJ28610244. Overall, these experiments identify the histamine H₄ receptor as chemotactic for human lung mast cells. This mechanism might influence mast cell accumulation in the lung.

Silencing of H4R inhibits the production of IL-1β through SAPK/JNK signaling in human mast cells

CONTEXT

Mast cell (MC) activation through H4R releases various inflammatory mediators which are associated with allergic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the siRNA-mediated gene silencing effect of H4R on human mast cells (HMCs) functions and the activation of stress-activated protein kinases (SAPK)/jun amino-terminal kinases (JNK) signaling pathways for the release of ineterleukin-1β (IL-1β) in HMCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

H4R expression was analyzed by RT-PCR and western blotting in human mast cell line-1 (HMC-1) cells and H4RsiRNA transfected cells. The effect of H4RsiRNA and H4R-antagonist on H4R mediated MC functions such as intracellular Ca²⁺ release, degranulation, IL-6 and IL-1β release, and the activation SAPK/JNK signaling pathways were studied. HMC-1 cells were stimulated with 10 μM of histamine (His) and 4-methylhistamine (4-MH) and pretreated individually with H4R-antagonist JNJ7777120 (JNJ), histamine H1 receptor (H1R)-antagonist mepyramine, and signaling molecule inhibitors SP600125 (SP) and Bay117082.

RESULTS

We found that the HMC-1 cells expressed H4R and H4RsiRNA treatment down regulated the H4R expression in HMC-1 cells. Both His and 4-MH induced the intracellular Ca²⁺ release and degranulation whereas; H4R siRNA and JNJ inhibited the effect. Furthermore, the activation of H4R caused the phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK pathways. H4R gene silencing and pretreatment with SP and JNJ decreased His and 4-MH induced phosphorylation of SAPK/JNK. We found that the activation of H4R caused the release of IL-1β (124.22 pg/ml) and IL-6 (122.50 pg/ml) on HMC-1 cells. Whereas, SAPK/JNK inhibitor (68.36 pg/ml) inhibited the H4R mediated IL-1β release.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the silencing of H4R inhibited the H4R mediated MC functions and SAPK/JNK phosphorylation. Furthermore, the H4R activation utilized SAPK/JNK signaling pathway for IL-1β release in HMC-1 cells.

Histamine Release from Mast Cells and Basophils

Mast cells and basophils represent the most relevant source of histamine in the immune system. Histamine is stored in cytoplasmic granules along with other amines (e.g., serotonin), proteases, proteoglycans, cytokines/chemokines, and angiogenic factors and rapidly released upon triggering with a variety of stimuli. Moreover, mast cell and basophil histamine release is regulated by several activating and inhibitory receptors. The engagement of different receptors can trigger different modalities of histamine release and degranulation. Histamine released from mast cells and basophils exerts its biological activities by activating four G protein-coupled receptors, namely H1R, H2R, H3R (expressed mainly in the brain), and the recently identified H4R. While H1R and H2R activation accounts mainly for some mast cell- and basophil-mediated allergic disorders, the selective expression of H4R on immune cells is uncovering new roles for histamine (possibly derived from mast cells and basophils) in allergic, inflammatory, and autoimmune disorders. Thus, the in-depth knowledge of mast cell and basophil histamine release and its biologic effects is poised to uncover new therapeutic avenues for a wide spectrum of disorders.

Aryl-1,3,5-triazine ligands of histamine H4 receptor attenuate inflammatory and nociceptive response to carrageen, zymosan and lipopolysaccharide

Objective and design

Histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) offers a great potential for new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of inflammation-based diseases. The aim of this study is to present the pharmacological profile of two recently synthesized ligands of H₄R with particular reference to their anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity.

Materials and subjects

We used mice and rats in the in vivo tests. We also used murine RAW 264.7 cells and isolated guinea-pig ileum in in vitro test.

Treatments

In the in vivo tests, animals were pre-treated with the increasing doses of investigated compounds (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg) and reference compounds: JNJ7777120 (25 mg/kg), indomethacin (10 mg/kg). Macrophages were pre-treated with two concentrations of tested compounds 100 and 10 µM.

Methods

We examined anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of the new H₄R antagonists in the in vivo models of inflammation induced by carrageenan or zymosan. We assessed the level of cAMP and release of cytokines, ROS and NO in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Moreover, we assessed the affinity of the investigated compounds for histamine H₁ receptor in functional studies.

Results

Both investigated compounds reduced paw edema, mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in the carrageenan-induced acute inflammation. Moreover, administration of the investigated compounds resulted in decreased granulocyte influx and attenuated nociceptive reaction in the zymosan-induced peritonitis model. In the same model of inflammation, the investigated compounds reduced vascular permeability; however, this effect was observed only after the highest applied dose. Furthermore, the test compounds had no impact on cell viability in the experiments on RAW 264.7 macrophages. In these cells, stimulated with LPS, the test compounds decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. They increased the cellular concentration of cAMP and attenuated the production of inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1β. All results were comparable to those obtained for the reference compound JNJ7777120 with the exception of the impact on NO production. Nevertheless, this effect was similar to that obtained for the other reference compound rolipram, which is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE 4) inhibitor. Further experiments revealed that both of the investigated compounds possessed relatively low affinity for histamine H₁ receptor and do not inhibit the activity of the PDE 4B1 enzyme. In addition, all the effects of the investigated compounds in in vivo experiments were observed at doses that did not cause neurologic deficits in rotarod test and did not reduce spontaneous locomotor activity.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of the new aryl-1,3,5-triazine derivatives, which are primarily H₄R–dependent.

Targeting mast cells: Uncovering prolific therapeutic role in myriad diseases

The mast cells are integral part of immune system and they have pleiotropic physiological functions in our body. Any type of abnormal stimuli causes the mast cells receptors to spur the otherwise innocuous mast cells to degranulate and release inflammatory mediators like histamine, cytokines, chemokines and prostaglandins. These mediators are involved in various diseases like allergy, asthma, mastocytosis, cardiovascular disorders, etc. Herein, we describe the receptors involved in degranulation of mast cells and are broadly divided into four categories: G-protein coupled receptors, ligand gated ion channels, immunoreceptors and pattern recognition receptors. Although, activation of pattern recognition receptors do not cause mast cell degranulation, but result in cytokines production. Degranulation itself is a complex process involving cascade of events like membrane fusion events and various proteins like VAMP, Syntaxins, DOCK5, SNAP-23, MARCKS. Furthermore, we described these mast cell receptors antagonists or agonists useful in treatment of myriad diseases. Like, omalizumab anti-IgE antibody is highly effective in asthma, allergic disorders treatment and recently mechanistic insight of IgE uncovered; matrix mettaloprotease inhibitor marimistat is under phase III trial for inflammation, muscular dystrophy diseases; ZPL-389 (H4 receptor antagonist) is in Phase 2a Clinical Trial for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis; JNJ3851868 an oral H4 receptor antagonist is in phase II clinical development for asthma, rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, research is still in inchoate stage to uncover mast cell biology, mast cell receptors, their therapeutic role in myriad diseases.

Discovery of nanomolar ligands with novel scaffolds for the histamine H4 receptor by virtual screening

The involvement of histamine H4 receptor (H4R) in immune cells chemotaxis and mediator release makes it an attractive target for the treatment of inflammation disorders. A decade of medicinal chemistry efforts has led to several promising ligands, although the chemical structures described so far possesses a singular limited diversity. We report here the discovery of novel structures, belonging to completely different scaffolds. The virtual screening was planed as a two-steps process. First, using a "scout screening" methodology, we have experimentally probed the H4R ligand binding site using a small size chemical library with very diverse structures, and identified a hit that further assist us in refining a raw 3D homology model. Second, the refined 3D model was used to conduct a widened virtual screening. This two-steps strategy proved to be very successful, both in terms of structural diversity and hit rate (23%). Moreover, the hits have high affinity for the H4R, with most potent ligands in the nanomolar range.

Synthesis and evaluation of a 2-benzothiazolylphenylmethyl ether class of histamine H4 receptor antagonists

Synthesis and biological evaluation of a new class of histamine H₄ receptor ligands, distinct from the previously reported chemotypes, are described. A virtual screening of our corporate compound collection identified a hit with an undesired dual H3R/H4R activity. Chemical exploration led to the discovery of a more potent and selective 2-benzothiazolylphenylmethyl ether lead compound.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors

Histamine is a developmentally highly conserved autacoid found in most vertebrate tissues. Its physiological functions are mediated by four 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) that are all targets of pharmacological intervention. The receptors display molecular heterogeneity and constitutive activity. H1R antagonists are long known antiallergic and sedating drugs, whereas the H2R was identified in the 1970s and led to the development of H2R-antagonists that revolutionized stomach ulcer treatment. The crystal structure of ligand-bound H1R has rendered it possible to design new ligands with novel properties. The H3R is an autoreceptor and heteroreceptor providing negative feedback on histaminergic and inhibition on other neurons. A block of these actions promotes waking. The H4R occurs on immuncompetent cells and the development of anti-inflammatory drugs is anticipated.

Biased signalling: the instinctive skill of the cell in the selection of appropriate signalling pathways

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are members of a family of proteins which are generally regarded as the largest group of therapeutic drug targets. Ligands of GPCRs do not usually activate all cellular signalling pathways linked to a particular seven-transmembrane receptor in a uniform manner. The fundamental idea behind this concept is that each ligand has its own ability, while interacting with the receptor, to activate different signalling pathways (or a particular set of signalling pathways) and it is this concept which is known as biased signalling. The importance of biased signalling is that it may selectively activate biological responses to favour therapeutically beneficial signalling pathways and to avoid adverse effects. There are two levels of biased signalling. First, bias can arise from the ability of GPCRs to couple to a subset of the available G-protein subtypes: Gαs, Gαq/11, Gαi/o or Gα12/13. These subtypes produce the diverse effects of GPCRs by targeting different effectors. Secondly, biased GPCRs may differentially activate G-proteins or β-arrestins. β-Arrestins are ubiquitously expressed and function to terminate or inhibit classic G-protein signalling and initiate distinct β-arrestin-mediated signalling processes. The interplay of G-protein and β-arrestin signalling largely determines the cellular consequences of the administration of GPCR-targeted drugs. In the present review, we highlight the particular functionalities of biased signalling and discuss its biological effects subsequent to GPCR activation. We consider that biased signalling is potentially allowing a choice between signalling through ‘beneficial’ pathways and the avoidance of ‘harmful’ ones.

Functional Profiling of 2-Aminopyrimidine Histamine H4 Receptor Modulators

Histamine is an important endogenous signaling molecule that is involved in a number of physiological processes including allergic reactions, gastric acid secretion, neurotransmitter release, and inflammation. The biological effects of histamine are mediated by four histamine receptors with distinct functions and distribution profiles (H1-H4). The most recently discovered histamine receptor (H4) has emerged as a promising drug target for treating inflammatory diseases. A detailed understanding of the role of the H4 receptor in human disease remains elusive, in part because low sequence similarity between the human and rodent H4 receptors complicates the translation of preclinical pharmacology to humans. This review provides an overview of H4 drug discovery programs that have studied cross-species structure-activity relationships, with a focus on the functional profiling of the 2-aminopyrimidine chemotype that has advanced to the clinic for allergy, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis.

Histamine H₄ receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

Histamine is a well-established mediator involved in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms and exerts its effect through activation of four histamine receptors (H1-H₄). The histamine H₄ receptor is the newest member of this histamine receptor family, and is expressed throughout the gastrointestinal tract as well as in the liver, pancreas and bile ducts. Functional studies using a combination of selective and non-selective H₄ receptor ligands have rapidly increased our knowledge of H₄ receptor involvement in gastrointestinal processes both under physiological conditions and in models of disease. Strong evidence points towards a role for H₄ receptors in the modulation of immune-mediated responses in gut inflammation such as in colitis, ischaemia/reperfusion injury, radiation-induced enteropathy and allergic gut reactions. In addition, data have emerged implicating H₄ receptors in gastrointestinal cancerogenesis, sensory signalling, and visceral pain as well as in gastric ulceration. These studies highlight the potential of H₄ receptor targeted therapy in the treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and cancer.

A search for functional histamine H4 receptors in the human, guinea pig and mouse brain

Histamine H4 receptors are expressed in immune cells, but their potential role in the brain is less clear. Although H4 transcripts have been identified in human and rat brain, the presence of H4 receptors on the protein level has so far not been proven since appropriate antibodies fulfilling the strict criteria for G protein-coupled receptors are missing. Here, we searched for functional H4 receptors in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex. We studied whether H4 receptor activation is associated with increased GTPγS binding and reduced noradrenaline release. The latter two effects have been previously shown for H3 receptors, which, like the H4 receptors, are coupled to G i/o protein. G protein activation was studied using (35)S-GTPγS binding in cortical membranes. The electrically induced (3)H-noradrenaline release was determined in superfused cortical slices. The H4 agonist 4-methylhistamine failed to affect (35)S-GTPγS binding and/or noradrenaline release in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex although an H 3 receptor-mediated increase in (35)S-GTPγS binding and inhibition of noradrenaline release occurred in parallel experiments. In conclusion, functional H4 receptors increasing (35)S-GTPγS binding and/or decreasing noradrenaline release are not found in human, guinea pig and mouse cortex.

Histaminergic system in brain disorders: lessons from the translational approach and future perspectives

Histamine and its receptors were first described as part of immune and gastrointestinal systems, but their presence in the central nervous system and importance in behavior are gaining more attention. The histaminergic system modulates different processes including wakefulness, feeding, and learning and memory consolidation. Histamine receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, and H4R) belong to the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors, present constitutive activity, and are subjected to inverse agonist action. The involvement of the histaminergic system in brain disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, sleep disorders, drug dependence, and Parkinson's disease, is largely studied. Data obtained from preclinical studies point antagonists of histamine receptors as promising alternatives to treat brain disorders. Thus, clinical trials are currently ongoing to assess the effects of these drugs on humans. This review summarizes the role of histaminergic system in brain disorders, as well as the effects of different histamine antagonists on animal models and humans.