Pain severity and prescription opioid misuse among individuals with chronic pain: The moderating role of alcohol use severity

Pain Severity and Interference and Substance Use Among Community Pharmacy Patients Prescribed Opioids: A Secondary Analysis of the PHARMSCREEN Study

This secondary analysis examined relationships between pain severity and interference and substance use among patients filling opioid prescriptions in Indiana and Ohio community pharmacies (n = 1,461). We likewise sought to explore the moderating role of gender in pain-substance use relations. We used patient-reported data from a cross-sectional health survey linked with controlled substance dispensing data from statewide prescription drug monitoring programs. Multivariable logistic regression estimated associations between pain severity and interference and various indices of risky prescription opioid use and non-opioid substance use. Exploratory analyses examined whether gender moderated associations. Increased pain severity was associated with increased odds of moderate- to high-risk opioid use (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.16-1.31) and opioid-benzodiazepine co-use (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.03-1.40). Increased pain interference was associated with greater odds of receiving opioids from multiple pharmacies or providers (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01-1.31). Increased pain severity and interference were associated with higher odds of any tobacco use (severity: OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.21; interference: OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12) and weekly to daily sedative use (severity: OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.03-1.25; interference: OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.22). Increased pain severity was associated with decreased odds of any alcohol use (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.99). Gender was a significant effect modifier in associations between pain and alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use. The study was registered in the database of clinicaltrials.gov (register number NCT03936985). Perspective: This study suggests that pain severity and interference are associated with increased use of non-medical prescription opioids, sedatives, and tobacco and decreased use of alcohol, in ways that are different between women and men. Findings may guide the development of gender-sensitive evidence-based strategies to ameliorate or prevent substance misuse among patients living with pain.

Risky alcohol use among patients dispensed opioid medications: A clinical community pharmacy study

BACKGROUND

Included among the significant risk factors for opioid overdose is concomitant use of other central nervous system depressants, particularly alcohol. Given the continued expansion of community pharmacy in the continuum of care, it is imperative to characterize alcohol use among pharmacy patients dispensed opioids in order to establish a foundation for identification and intervention in these settings.

METHODS

This secondary analysis utilized data from a one-time, cross-sectional health assessment conducted among patients dispensed opioid medications in 19 community pharmacies in Indiana and Ohio. Adult, English speaking, patients not receiving cancer care who were dispensed opioid medications were asked to self-report alcohol and substance use, behavioral and physical health, and demographic information. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were employed to characterize alcohol use/risky alcohol use and patient characteristics associated therewith.

RESULTS

The analytical sample included 1494 individuals. Participants were on average 49 years of age (Standard Deviation=14.9)-with 6% being persons of color (n = 89). Weekly drinking was reported by 18.1% (n = 204) and daily drinking was reported by 6.8% (n = 77) of the study sample, with a total of 143 (9.6%) participants reporting moderate/high risk drinking. Males (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]=1.94, 95% CI=1.3,2.9), those with higher pain interference (AOR=1.44, 95% CI=1.0,2.0), overdose history (AOR=1.93, 95% CI=1.1,3.5), sedative use (AOR=2.11, 95% CI=1.3,3.5), and tobacco use (AOR=2.41, 95% CI=1.6,3.7) had increased likelihood of moderate/high risk alcohol use (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Medication labeling and clinical guidelines clearly indicate that patients should abstain from concomitant use of opioids and alcohol. This study has identified rates and associated risk factors of risky alcohol use among a clinical sample of community pharmacy patients dispensed opioid medications. Continuing this line of research and potential clinical service development has the ability to improve patient safety through addressing a significant gap within the current opioid epidemic.

Novel TRPV1 Modulators with Reduced Pungency Induce Analgesic Effects in Mice

Capsaicin, the compound in hot chili peppers responsible for their pungency and an agonist of the transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 1 (TRPV1), has long been known to promote the desensitization of nociceptors at high concentrations. This has led to the utilization and implementation of topical capsaicin cream as an analgesic to treat acute and chronic pain. Critically, the application of capsaicin cream is limited due to capsaicin's high pungency, which is experienced prior to analgesia. To combat this issue, novel capsaicin analogues were developed to provide analgesia with reduced pungency. Analogues reported in this paper add to and show some differences from previous structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of capsaicin-like molecules against TRPV1, including the necessity of phenol in the aromatic "A-region", the secondary amide in the "B-region", and modifications in the hydrophobic "C-region". This provided a new framework for de novo small-molecule design using capsaicin as the starting point. In this study, we describe the synthesis of capsaicin analogues, their in vitro activity in Ca2+ assays, and initial in vivo pungency and feasibility studies of capsaicin analogues YB-11 and YB-16 as analgesics. Our results demonstrate that male and female mice treated with YB capsaicin analogues showed diminished pain-associated behavior in the spontaneous formalin assay as well as reduced thermal sensitivity in the hotplate assay.

Kappa opioid receptor blockade in the nucleus accumbens shell prevents sex-dependent alcohol deprivation effect induced by inflammatory pain

ABSTRACT

Pain-induced negative affect reduces life quality of patients by increasing psychiatric comorbidities, including alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Indeed, clinical data suggest pain as a risk factor to suffer AUDs, predicting relapse drinking in abstinent patients. Here, we analyse the impact of pain on alcohol relapse and the role of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) activation in mediating these pain-induced effects because KORs play an important role in pain-driven negative affect and AUD. Female and male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 2 alcohol intermittent access periods separated by a forced abstinence period. The complete Freund adjuvant model of inflammatory pain was introduced during abstinence, and alcohol intake before and after alcohol reintroduction was assessed. In addition, we used behavioural approaches to measure stress and memory impairment and biochemical assays to measure KOR expression in abstinence and reintroduction periods. Only female CFA-treated rats increased alcohol intake during the reintroduction period. Concomitantly, this group showed enhanced anxiety-like behaviour and increased KOR expression in the nucleus accumbens shell that was developed during abstinence and remained during the reintroduction period. Finally, KOR antagonist norbinaltorphimine was administered in the nucleus accumbens shell during abstinence to prevent a pain-induced alcohol deprivation effect, a phenomenon observed in CFA-female rats. The administration of norbinaltorphimine effectively blocked a pain-induced alcohol deprivation effect in female rats. Our data evidenced that inflammatory pain constitutes a risk factor to increase alcohol consumption during a reintroduction phase only in female rats by the rise and maintenance of stress probably mediated by KOR signalling in the nucleus accumbens.

Opioid misuse in community pharmacy patients with chronic non-cancer pain

AIMS

Community pharmacists could contribute to identify people misusing prescription opioids, which may be associated with hospitalizations, substance use disorders and death. This study investigated prescription opioid misuse in community pharmacy patients and the factors potentially associated with high Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) scores.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, pharmacy students asked patients with opioid prescriptions to fill in a questionnaire (including the POMI) in community pharmacies in a French region, in April 2019. Eligible patients were adults with chronic non-cancer pain who consented to participate.

RESULTS

In total, 414 patients (62.4% women; mean age: 58.00 years ± 16.00) were included. The prescribed opioids were mainly weak opioids (73.2%; paracetamol/tramadol: 35%). Strong opioids (32.6%) included oxycodone (11.95%), fentanyl (9%) and morphine (9%). The median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 40 mg/day (IQR_25-75 : 20-80). The POMI score (0 to 6) was ≥4 in 16% of patients who were younger (P < .01), more urban (P = .03), with higher pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score (P < .01) and MME (P < .01), and treated more frequently with strong opioids (P = .04). In multivariate analysis, age (OR_{for 10y} : 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82, P < .0001)), VAS (OR_2units : 1.78 (95% CI: 1.26-2.40, P = .0008)), and MME (>100 mg, OR: 2.65 (95% CI: 1.14-4.41, P = .0194)) were significantly associated with POMI scores ≥4.

CONCLUSIONS

The high proportion of patients with high POMI scores underlines the interest of prescription opioid misuse screening in community pharmacies, in order to help these patients and refer them to pain specialists, if needed.

New Persistent Opioid Use After Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Study of 348 Patients

INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic is a devastating public health issue to which orthopaedic surgery is inextricably linked. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for new persistent opioid use after orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery among patients who were opioid naive preoperatively.

METHODS

Patients undergoing orthopaedic foot or ankle surgery at a single institution were identified. Our state's prescription monitoring program was used to track opioid prescriptions filled in the preoperative (6 months to 30 days before surgery), perioperative (30 days before to 14 days after), and postoperative (2 to 6 months after) periods. Patients filling a prescription during the preoperative period were excluded. Baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and perioperative morphine milligram equivalents were tested for association with new persistent use during the postoperative period.

RESULTS

A total of 348 opioid-naive patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the rate of new persistent postoperative opioid use was 8.9%. Patients reporting recreational drug use had the highest risk, at 26.7% (relative risk [RR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 8.2, P = 0.0141). In addition, patients who had perioperative opioid prescription >160 morphine milligram equivalents were at increased risk (RR = 2.2, 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 4.5, P = 0.021). Other risk factors included age ≥40 years (RR = 2.2, P = 0.049) and consumption of ≥6 alcoholic beverages per week (RR = 2.1, P = 0.040). New persistent use was not associated with ankle/hindfoot surgery (versus midfoot/forefoot), bone surgery (versus soft-tissue), or chronic condition (versus acute; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The rate of new persistent postoperative opioid use after orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery is high, at 8.9%. Greater perioperative opioid prescription is a risk factor for new persistent use and is modifiable. Other risk factors include recreational drug use, greater alcohol use, and greater age. Orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons should limit perioperative prescriptions and be cognizant of these other risk factors to limit the negative effects of opioid prescriptions on their patients and communities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Considerations when conducting moderation analysis with a binary outcome: Applications to clinical and social pharmacy research

Clinical and social pharmacy researchers often have questions regarding contingencies of effects (i.e., moderation) that are tested by including interactions in statistical models. Much of the available literature for estimating and testing effects that emanate from moderation models is based on extensions of the linear model with continuous outcomes. Binary (or dichotomous) outcome variables, such as prescription-medication misuse versus no misuse, are commonly encountered by clinical and social pharmacy researchers. In moderation analysis, binary outcomes have led to an increased focus on the fact that measures of interaction are scale-dependent; thus, researchers may need to consider both additive interaction and multiplicative interaction. Further complicating interpretation is that the statistical model chosen for an interaction can provide different answers to questions of moderation. This manuscript will: 1) identify research questions in clinical and social pharmacy that necessitate the use of these statistical methods, 2) review statistical models that can be used to estimate effects when the outcome of interest is binary, 3) review basic concepts of moderation, 4) describe the challenges inherent in conducting moderation analysis when modeling binary outcomes, and 5) demonstrate how to conduct such analyses and interpret relevant statistical output (including interpretations of interactions on additive and multiplicative scales with a focus on identifying which statistical models for binary outcomes lead to which measure of interaction). Although much of the basis for this paper comes from research in epidemiology, recognition of these issues has occurred in other disciplines.

Hazardous alcohol use is associated with greater pain interference and prescription opioid misuse among persons living with HIV and chronic pain

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use is common among persons living with HIV (PLWH), who often experience chronic pain, yet its impact on pain and opioid misuse is not fully characterized.

METHODS

We assessed associations between hazardous alcohol use and pain interference, defined as the self-reported impact of pain on daily living, pain severity, and risk for opioid misuse among PLWH who were on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). A cohort was recruited as part of the "Targeting Effective Analgesia in Clinics for HIV" (TEACH) study, a randomized controlled trial to improve LTOT in HIV clinics. The Alcohol Use Disorders Test (AUDIT), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) were administered at both baseline and 12-months. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models, incorporating data from both time points, evaluated associations between hazardous alcohol use (AUDIT ≥8) and: pain interference (0-10), pain severity (0-10), and opioid misuse risk (COMM ≥13), adjusting for age, gender, depressive symptoms, use of non-alcohol substances, time-point, and study-arm.

RESULTS

The sample was comprised of 166 participants, of which 31 (19%) reported hazardous alcohol use. The majority were male (65%), black (72%), and the mean age was 54 (range: 29-77). Hazardous alcohol use was significantly associated with higher pain interference (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.08, 1.96) and higher odds of opioid misuse risk (AOR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.88-7.39), but not pain severity (AMD: 0.47, 95% CI: - 0.35, 1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Hazardous alcohol use was associated with greater functional impairment in daily living from their pain and higher odds for prescription opioid misuse in this study of PLWH on LTOT. Providers should be attentive to alcohol use among PLWH who are prescribed opioids given associations with pain and opioid misuse.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02564341 (Intervention, September 30, 2015) and NCT02525731 (Patient Cohort, August 17, 2015). Both prospectively registered.

The Role of Anxiety Sensitivity in the Relation Between Pain Intensity with Substance Use and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Among Smokers with Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

The additive effect of experiencing chronic pain in the context of nicotine addiction places smokers with chronic pain at elevated risk for experiencing physical and mental health problems. Isolating factors that explain linkages between pain and health-related outcomes among smokers with chronic pain is an important next step. Therefore, the current study examined the explanatory role of anxiety sensitivity in relations between pain intensity and current opioid misuse, severity of opioid dependence, tobacco-related problems, and anxiety/depressive symptoms.

METHOD

Participants were 187 (M_age = 39.02, SD = 9.94, 74.9% female) daily smokers with chronic pain who completed a battery of self-report measures on pain experience, anxiety sensitivity, tobacco and opioid use, and anxiety/depression symptoms. Indirect effect analyses were conducted to examine anxiety sensitivity as a mediator of the relations between pain intensity and health-related outcomes.

RESULTS

A significant indirect effect emerged for pain intensity, through anxiety sensitivity, on opioid misuse (ab = 0.83, SE = 0.24, 95% CI [0.39, 1.34], CSE = 0.17), severity of opioid dependence (ab = 0.17, SE = 0.05, 95% CI [0.08, 0.26], CSE = 0.16), tobacco use problems (ab = 0.16, SE = 0.06, 95% CI [0.07, 0.28], CSE = 0.11), and anxiety/depressive symptoms (ab = 0.20, SE = 0.06, 95% CI [0.10, 0.31], CSE = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

The current investigation highlights the potential importance of anxiety sensitivity in terms of the experience of pain with severity of substance use and anxiety/depressive symptoms among smokers with chronic pain.

Pain-induced alterations in the dynorphinergic system within the mesocorticolimbic pathway: Implication for alcohol addiction

Latest studies have revealed that pain negatively impacts on reward processing and motivation leading to negative affective states and stress. These states not only reduce quality of life of patients by increasing the appearance of psychiatric comorbidities, but also have an important impact on vulnerability to drug abuse, including alcohol. In fact, clinical, epidemiological but also preclinical studies have revealed that the presence of pain is closely related to alcohol use disorders (AUDs). All this evidence suggests that pain is a factor that increases the risk of suffering AUD, predicting heavy drinking behavior and relapse drinking in those patients with a previous history of AUD. The negative consequences of chronic pain and its impact on stress and AUD are likely mediated by alterations in the central nervous system, especially in the stress and reward systems. Therefore, pain and stress impact on dopaminergic mesolimbic pathway can lead to an increase in drug abuse liability. In this mini review we analyze the interaction between pain, stress, and alcohol addiction, and how dynamic changes in the kappa opioid system might play a crucial role in the development of compulsive alcohol drinking in chronic pain patients.

Pain interference and catastrophizing are not associated with polysubstance use among treatment-seeking patients with substance use disorders and chronic pain

Background: People with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring chronic pain report the use of myriad substances, which is concerning due to the heightened risk of overdose associated with polysubstance use. Identifying malleable factors associated with polysubstance use in this population can inform interventions. In this study, we examined whether two pain processes - pain interference and pain catastrophizing - were associated with polysubstance use. Objectives: We examined the cross-sectional associations among self-reported pain interference and catastrophizing and polysubstance use. We also determined if sex and primary SUD moderated these associations. Methods: Participants were 236 (36% female) adults receiving inpatient treatment for SUD (58% alcohol use disorder, 42% opioid use disorder) who met criteria for chronic pain. We utilized negative binomial regression to examine associations between pain interference and catastrophizing (focal independent variables) and the number of substances used in the month before treatment (i.e., polysubstance use; outcome). Results: Participants used three substances, on average, in the month prior to treatment. Neither pain interference (IRR = 1.05, p = .06) nor pain catastrophizing (IRR = 1.00, p = .37) were associated with polysubstance use. The association between pain interference and polysubstance use was moderated by sex and primary SUD (ps<0.01), such that these variables were positively related in men and those with alcohol use disorder. Conclusion: Pain interference and catastrophizing were not uniformly associated with polysubstance use, underscoring the need to examine other factors associated with polysubstance use in this population. However, men and those with alcohol use disorder might benefit from interventions targeting pain interference to reduce polysubstance use.

Pharmacotherapeutic management of co-morbid alcohol and opioid use

Opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are two highly prevalent substance-related disorders worldwide. Co-use of the substances is also quite prevalent, yet there are no pharmacological treatment approaches specifically designed to treat co-morbid OUD and AUD. Here, the authors critically summarize OUD, AUD and opioid/alcohol co-use and their current pharmacotherapies for treatment. They also review the mechanisms of action of opioids and alcohol within the brain reward circuitry and discuss potential combined mechanisms of action and resulting neuroadaptations. Pharmacotherapies that aim to treat AUD or OUD that may be beneficial in the treatment of co-use are also highlighted. Preclinical models assessing alcohol and opioid co-use remain sparse. Lasting neuroadaptations in brain reward circuits caused by co-use of alcohol and opioids remains largely understudied. In order to fully understand the neurobiological underpinnings of alcohol and opioid co-use and develop efficacious pharmacotherapies, the preclinical field must expand its current experimental paradigms of 'single drug' use to encompass polysubstance use. Such studies will provide insights on the neural alterations induced by opioid and alcohol co-use, and may help develop novel pharmacotherapies for individuals with co-occurring alcohol and opioid use disorders.

Anxiety sensitivity and opioid misuse and dependence among trauma-exposed adults with chronic pain

It is unclear if anxiety sensitivity may serve as mechanism underlying the relation between posttraumatic stress symptom severity and opioid misuse and dependence among trauma-exposed persons with chronic pain. Therefore, the current study evaluated the explanatory role of anxiety sensitivity in the relations between posttraumatic stress symptom severity and opioid misuse and dependence. Participants included 294 trauma-exposed adults with chronic pain (71.4% female, M_age = 37.79 years, SD = 10.85, M_{pain rating} = 7.32/10) that reported current moderate to severe chronic pain and prescription opioid use. Participants were recruited via an online national survey in the United States of America. There were statistically significant indirect effects of posttraumatic stress symptom severity via anxiety sensitivity in relation to opioid misuse and dependence. The indirect effects of the reverse models for opioid misuse and dependence also were significant and suggest the potential for bi-directional relations; however, the magnitude of the effect was smaller in the tests of specificity than in the original models. The present findings provide initial empirical evidence that greater posttraumatic stress symptom severity is related to anxiety sensitivity, which in turn, is associated with increased opioid misuse and dependence among trauma-exposed individuals with chronic pain.