1
|
Dahlem CH, Dwan M, Dobbs B, Rich R, Jaffe K, Shuman CJ. Using RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Recovery Opioid Overdose Team Plus: A Peer-Led Post-overdose Quick Response Team. Community Ment Health J 2024:10.1007/s10597-024-01319-x. [PMID: 39044057 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01319-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Peer recovery coaches utilize their lived experiences to support overdose survivors, a role gaining prominence across communities. A convergent mixed methods design, informed by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, was used to evaluate the Recovery Opioid Overdose Team Plus (ROOT +), through an iterative evaluation using web-based surveys and qualitative interviews. Reach: Over 27 months, ROOT + responded to 83% of suspected overdose referrals (n = 607) and engaged with 41% of survivors (n = 217) and 7% of survivors' family/friends (n = 38). Effectiveness: Among those initially engaged with ROOT +, 36% of survivors remained engaged, entered treatment, or were in recovery at 90 days post-overdose (n = 77). Adoption: First responders completed 77% of ROOT + referrals (n = 468). Implementation: Barriers included lack of awareness of ROOT + , working phones, and access to treatment from community partner interviews (n = 15). Maintenance: Adaptations to ROOT + were made to facilitate implementation. Peer-led teams are promising models to engage with overdose survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Hwa Dahlem
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Mary Dwan
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Kaitlyn Jaffe
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Clayton J Shuman
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Senthilkumar R, Bailey A, Moner E, Parduhn T, Evans EA. Lessons Learned from Implementation of a Post-opioid Overdose Outreach Program in a Rural Massachusetts Community. Community Ment Health J 2024; 60:482-493. [PMID: 37902945 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01198-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Post-overdose outreach programs can play a key role in reducing opioid overdose deaths and increasing access to healthcare services. The design and implementation of these programs, especially in rural communities, remains a gap in knowledge. We aimed to understand the lessons learned from the implementation experiences of the Community, Opportunity, Network, Navigation, Exploration, and Connection Team (CONNECT), a post-overdose outreach program based in a rural community in Massachusetts. We conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews with 21 community partners after the first year of implementation in 2022. Participants included behavioral health, medical, public health, and public safety personnel involved in the design and implementation of CONNECT. Using a combination of thematic and rapid qualitative analysis methods, we inductively coded transcripts for salient themes. Themes were mapped onto the Health Equity Implementation Framework to better understand implementation and health-equity factors. Facilitators to implementation of this innovation included efficient inter-partner data sharing and coordination, and ability to offer numerous health services to clients to meet their needs. Key partners identified that CONNECT serves clients who use opioids, have previous involvement with the legal system, and reside in low-income areas within this rural region. Unhoused individuals and individuals who do not call 9-11 after an overdose were identified as populations of need that CONNECT was missing due to structural barriers. Partners shared how the context of this rural community came with challenges related to limited access to health services and pervasive stigma towards substance use, while it was also perceived to foster a culture of collaboration and unity among multidisciplinary key partners. Post overdose outreach programs serve clients with complex health needs. The ability to access services for these health needs is shaped by the post overdose outreach program and its key partners, and by the broader community context. As post-overdose outreach programs continue to expand as a promising strategy to address the opioid overdose crisis, there exists a need to contextualize implementation strategies to inform adaptations and develop best-practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rithika Senthilkumar
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - Amelia Bailey
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Box G-S121-3, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
| | - Emily Moner
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - Taylor Parduhn
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Evans
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schoenberger SF, Cummins ER, Carroll JJ, Yan S, Lambert A, Bagley SM, Xuan Z, Green TC, Cook F, Yule AM, Walley AY, Formica SW. "Wanna cry this out real quick?": an examination of secondary traumatic stress risk and resilience among post-overdose outreach staff in Massachusetts. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:66. [PMID: 38504244 PMCID: PMC10949647 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00975-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-overdose outreach programs engage overdose survivors and their families soon after an overdose event. Staff implementing these programs are routinely exposed to others' trauma, which makes them vulnerable to secondary traumatic stress (STS) and compassion fatigue. The purpose of this study was to explore experiences of STS and associated upstream and downstream risk and protective factors among program staff. METHODS We conducted a post-hoc analysis of semi-structured interviews with post-overdose outreach program staff in Massachusetts. Transcripts were analyzed using a multi-step hybrid inductive-deductive approach to explore approaches and responses to outreach work, factors that might give rise to STS, and compassion fatigue resilience. Findings were organized according to the three main constructs within Ludick and Figley's compassion fatigue resilience model (empathy, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion fatigue resilience). RESULTS Thirty-eight interviews were conducted with staff from 11 post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts. Within the empathy construct, concern for others' well-being emerged as a motivator to engage in post-overdose outreach work - with staff trying to understand others' perspectives and using this connection to deliver respectful and compassionate services. Within the secondary traumatic stress construct, interviewees described regular and repeated exposure to others' trauma - made more difficult when exposures overlapped with staff members' personal social spheres. Within the compassion fatigue resilience construct, interviewees described the presence and absence of self-care practices and routines, social supports, and workplace supports. Job satisfaction and emotional detachment from work experiences also arose as potential protective factors. Interviewees reported inconsistent presence and utilization of formal support for STS and compassion fatigue within their post-overdose outreach teams. CONCLUSION Post-overdose outreach program staff may experience secondary traumatic stress and may develop compassion fatigue, particularly in the absence of resilience and coping strategies and support. Compassion fatigue resilience approaches for post-overdose outreach staff warrant further development and study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha F Schoenberger
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Emily R Cummins
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Jennifer J Carroll
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University, 10 Current Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27605, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brown University, 222, Richmond St. Providence, 02903, USA
| | - Shapei Yan
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Audrey Lambert
- Access, Harm Reduction, Overdose Prevention and Education (AHOPE), Boston Public Health Commission, 774 Albany Street, Access, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Traci C Green
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Franklin Cook
- Peer Support Community Partners, 30 Brimmer Street, Watertown, MA, 02472, USA
| | - Amy M Yule
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Scott W Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc, 84 Mill Street, Lincoln, MA, 01773, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beaugard CA, Formica SW, Cummins ER, Bagley SM, Beletsky L, Green TC, Murray SP, Yan S, Xuan Z, Walley AY, Carroll JJ. Privacy and confidentiality in Massachusetts' post-overdose outreach programs: Mixed methods analysis of outreach staff surveys and interviews. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 124:104310. [PMID: 38181671 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health-public safety partnerships for post-overdose outreach have emerged in many communities to prevent future overdose events. These efforts often identify overdose survivors through emergency call data and seek to link them with relevant services. The aim of this study was to describe how post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts manage the confidentiality of identifiable information and privacy of survivors. METHODS In 2019, 138 Massachusetts programs completed surveys eliciting responses to questions about program operations. Descriptive statistics were calculated from the closed-ended survey responses. Thirty-eight interviews were conducted among outreach staff members during 2019-2020. Interview transcripts and open-ended survey responses were thematically analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches. RESULTS Of programs that completed the survey, 90 % (n = 124/138) reported acting to protect the privacy of survivors following overdose events, and 84 % (n = 114/135) reported implementing a protocol to maintain the confidentiality of personal information. Interviews with outreach team members indicated substantial variation in practice. Outreach programs regularly employed discretion in determining actions in the field, sometimes undermining survivor privacy and confidentiality (e.g., by disclosing the overdose event to family members). Programs aiming to prioritize privacy and confidentiality attempted to make initial contact with survivors by phone, limited or concealed materials left behind when no one was home, and/or limited the number of contact attempts. CONCLUSIONS Despite the establishment of privacy and confidentiality protocols within most post-overdose outreach programs, application of these procedures was varied, discretionary, and at times viewed by staff as competing with engagement efforts. Individual outreach overdose teams should prioritize privacy and confidentiality during outreach to protect overdose survivors from undesired exposure. In addition to individual program changes, access to overdose survivor information could be changed across all programs to bolster privacy and confidentiality protocols. For example, transitioning the management of overdose-related information to non-law enforcement agencies would limit officers' ability to disseminate such information at their discretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne A Beaugard
- Boston University School of Social Work, 264 Bay State Road, Boston MA 02215, United States.
| | - Scott W Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc., 84 Mill St., Lincoln, MA 01773, United States
| | - Emily R Cummins
- Ariadne Labs, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 405 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Northeastern University School of Law, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and the Action Lab 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Traci C Green
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Institute for Behavioral Health, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, United States
| | - Stephen P Murray
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Shapei Yan
- Boston Medical Center, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Crosstown Building - CT 454, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Jennifer J Carroll
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University, 10 Current Drive, Raleigh, NC 27605, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carroll JJ, Cummins ER, Formica SW, Green TC, Bagley SM, Beletsky L, Rosenbloom D, Xuan Z, Walley AY. The police paradox: A qualitative study of post-overdose outreach program implementation through public health-public safety partnerships in Massachusetts. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 120:104160. [PMID: 37597344 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-overdose outreach has emerged in the United States as an increasingly common response to non-fatal overdose. This qualitative study investigates the implementation of such programs through public health-public safety partnerships in Massachusetts. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with post-overdose outreach team members, overdose survivors, and family members who received outreach. Interview transcripts were inductively analyzed to identify emergent themes and subsequently organized within the framework of Ecological Systems Theory. RESULTS Forty-nine interviews were conducted, including 15 police officers (80% male, 100% non-Hispanic White); 23 public health partners (48% male, 87% non-Hispanic White); 8 overdose survivors who received outreach services and 3 parents of survivors who received services (collectively 27% male, 64% non-Hispanic White). Implementation factors identified across all levels (macrosystem, exosystem, mesosystem, and microsystem) of Ecological Systems Theory included key program facilitators, such as access to police data and funding (macro), interagency collaboration (exo), shared recognition of community needs (exo), supportive relationships among team members (meso), and program champions (micro). Common barriers included inherent contradictions between policing and public health mandates (macro), poor local treatment and service capacity (exo), divergent staff views of program goals (exo), overdose survivors' prior negative experiences with law enforcement (meso), difficulty locating overdose survivors (meso), and police officers' lack of qualifications or training in providing psycho-social services (micro). CONCLUSIONS Most post-overdose outreach programs in this study were dependent on funding and data-sharing partnerships, which police agencies largely controlled. Yet, police participation, especially during outreach visits presented numerous challenges for engaging overdose survivors and establishing non-coercive linkages with evidence-based services, which may undermine the public health goals of these programs. These findings should inform state and federal efforts to expand the role of law enforcement in behavioral health initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Carroll
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University, 10 Current Drive, Raleigh, NC 27605, United States; Department of Medicine, Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, United States.
| | - Emily R Cummins
- Ariadne Labs, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 405 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Scott W Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc., 84 Mill St., Lincoln, MA 01773, United States
| | - Traci C Green
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Institute for Behavioral Health, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, United States
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Northeastern University School of Law, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and the Action Lab, 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Health in Justice Action Lab, Northeastern University, 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - David Rosenbloom
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Crosstown Building - CT 454, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Crosstown Building - CT 454, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kimmel SD, Xuan Z, Yan S, Lambert AM, Formica SW, Green TC, Carroll JJ, Bagley SM, Rosenbloom D, Beletsky L, Walley AY. Characteristics of post-overdose outreach programs and municipal-level opioid overdose in Massachusetts. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 120:104164. [PMID: 37713939 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-overdose outreach programs have proliferated in response to opioid overdose. Implementing these programs is associated with reductions in overdose rates, but the role of specific program characteristics in overdose trends has not been evaluated. METHODS Among 58 Massachusetts municipalities with post-overdose outreach programs, we examined associations between five domains of post-overdose outreach program characteristics (outreach contact rate, naloxone distribution, coercive practices, harm reduction activities, and social service provision or referral) and rates of fatal opioid overdoses and opioid-related emergency medical system responses (i.e., ambulance activations) per calendar quarter from 2013 to 2019 using segmented regression analyses with adjustment for municipal covariates and fixed effects. For both outcomes, each domain was modeled: a) individually, b) with other characteristics, and c) with other characteristics and municipal-level fixed effects. RESULTS There were no significant associations (p < 0.05) between outreach contact rate, naloxone distribution, coercive practices, or harm reduction activities with municipal fatal overdose trends. Municipalities with programs providing or referring to more social services experienced 21% fewer fatal overdoses compared to programs providing or referring to more social services (Rate Ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.66-0.93, p = 0.01). Compared to municipalities in quarters when programs had no outreach contacts, municipalities with some, but less than the median outreach contacts, experienced 14% lower opioid-related emergency responses (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.01). Associations between naloxone distribution, coercive practices, harm reduction practices, or social services and opioid-related emergency responses were not consistently significant across modeling approaches. CONCLUSION Municipalities with post-overdose outreach programs providing or referring to more social services had lower fatal opioid overdose rates. Municipalities in quarters when programs outreached to overdose survivors had fewer opioid-related emergency responses, but only among programs with below the median number of outreach contacts. Social service linkage should be core to post-overdose programs. Evaluations should assess program characteristics to optimize program design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simeon D Kimmel
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States; Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Shapei Yan
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Audrey M Lambert
- AHOPE, Department of Recovery Services, Boston Public Health Commission, 774 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Scott W Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc, 84 Mill Street, Lincoln, MA 01773, United States
| | - Traci C Green
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 024537, United States; Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, United States; COBRE on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital, 1125 North Main St., Providence, RI 02904, United States
| | - Jennifer J Carroll
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI 02903, United States; Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States; Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - David Rosenbloom
- Department of Health, Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 348W, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Northeastern University School of Law, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and The Action Lab, 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Division of Global Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gillman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Crosstown Building - 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xuan Z, Yan S, Formica SW, Green TC, Beletsky L, Rosenbloom D, Bagley SM, Kimmel SD, Carroll JJ, Lambert AM, Walley AY. Association of Implementation of Postoverdose Outreach Programs With Subsequent Opioid Overdose Deaths Among Massachusetts Municipalities. JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80:468-477. [PMID: 36920385 PMCID: PMC10018400 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
Importance Nonfatal opioid overdose is the leading risk factor for subsequent fatal overdose and represents a critical opportunity to reduce future overdose and mortality. Postoverdose outreach programs emerged in Massachusetts beginning in 2013 with the main purpose of linking opioid overdose survivors to addiction treatment and harm reduction services. Objective To evaluate whether the implementation of postoverdose outreach programs among Massachusetts municipalities was associated with lower opioid fatality rates compared with municipalities without postoverdose outreach programs. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective interrupted time-series analysis was performed over 26 quarters (from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2019) across 93 municipalities in Massachusetts. These 93 municipalities were selected based on a threshold of 30 or more opioid-related emergency medical services (EMS) responses in 2015. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to August 2022. Exposures The main exposure was municipality postoverdose outreach programs. Municipalities had various program inceptions during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was quarterly municipal opioid fatality rate per 100 000 population. The secondary outcome was quarterly municipal opioid-related EMS response (ambulance trips) rates per 100 000 population. Results The mean (SD) population size across 93 municipalities was 47 622 (70 307), the mean (SD) proportion of female individuals was 51.5% (1.5%) and male individuals was 48.5% (1.5%), and the mean (SD) age proportions were 29.7% (4.0%) younger than 25 years, 26.0% (4.8%) aged 25 to 44 years, 14.8% (2.1%) aged 45 to 54 years, 13.4% (2.1%) aged 55 to 64 years, and 16.1% (4.4%) aged 65 years or older. Postoverdose programs were implemented in 58 municipalities (62%). Following implementation, there were no significant level changes in opioid fatality rate (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.96-1.19; P = .20). However, there was a significant slope decrease in opioid fatality rate (annualized aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98; P = .003) compared with the municipalities without the outreach programs. Similarly, there was a significant slope decrease in opioid-related EMS response rates (annualized aRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .007). Several sensitivity analyses yielded similar findings. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, among Massachusetts municipalities with high numbers of opioid-related EMS responses, implementation of postoverdose outreach programs was significantly associated with lower opioid fatality rates over time compared with municipalities that did not implement such programs. Program components, including cross-sectoral partnerships, operational best practices, involvement of law enforcement, and related program costs, warrant further evaluation to enhance effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziming Xuan
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shapei Yan
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott W. Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc, Lincoln, Massachusetts
| | - Traci C. Green
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Institute for Behavioral Health, Waltham, Massachusetts
- Brown University, Department of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Northeastern University School of Law, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, and The Action Lab, Boston, Massachusetts
- University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease and Global Public Health, La Jolla
| | - David Rosenbloom
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah M. Bagley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Simeon D. Kimmel
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer J. Carroll
- Brown University, Department of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
- North Carolina State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Raleigh
| | | | - Alexander Y. Walley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bailey A, Harrington C, Evans EA. A scoping review of community-based post-opioid overdose intervention programs: implications of program structure and outcomes. HEALTH & JUSTICE 2023; 11:3. [PMID: 36707446 PMCID: PMC9883127 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-022-00201-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An emergent intervention to address the opioid epidemic is the use of multidisciplinary outreach teams which connect an individual in the community to healthcare resources after the experience of an opioid overdose. While these interventions are receiving federal funding, less is known empirically to inform future interventions. Understanding the process and outcomes of these interventions is advisable due to the novel partnerships of public health and law enforcement agencies who sometimes hold divergent goals. The objective of the present review was to describe program structure and evaluated outcomes of community-based post-overdose interventions. RESULTS A search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science yielded 5 peer-reviewed articles that detail the implementation and outcomes of interventions delivered in the United States published from 2001 to July 2021. Most interventions used a multidisciplinary outreach team and referenced first responder data to contact individuals who recently experienced an overdose at their residence. Services offered often included referral to substance use treatment, recovery coaches, and social services. Method of outreach, evaluation measures, and outcomes varied. From the available literature, facilitators of program engagement included communication, information sharing, and leadership buy-in among multidisciplinary partners. CONCLUSIONS Future studies could benefit from exploration of service provision in rural areas, for family affected by overdose, and for minoritized populations. Community-based post-overdose interventions utilizing a law enforcement partnership are emergent with promising yet limited examples in empirical literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Bailey
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 USA
| | - Calla Harrington
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Evans
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Massachusetts Department of Public Health Post Overdose Support Team Initiative: A Public Health-Centered Co-Response Model for Post-Overdose Outreach. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2022; 28:S311-S319. [PMID: 36194799 PMCID: PMC9531990 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Post-overdose outreach programs have emerged in response to surging overdose deaths amid fentanyl contamination of the illicit opioid supply. Predominantly centered in police departments in collaboration with public health providers, these programs conduct home-based outreach with survivors and their social networks following an overdose. APPROACH We describe implementation of the Post Overdose Support Team (POST) initiative, an ongoing public health funded and centered approach. Post Overdose Support Team is a person-centered model led by harm reductionists in health and human services agencies in collaboration with municipal first responders. The goal of POST is to engage overdose survivors and their social network to improve general health, connect people to services (including access to treatment, if desired), and reduce risk of subsequent overdose. IMPLEMENTATION Nine agencies in Massachusetts that are part of the state's overdose education and naloxone distribution network implemented POST programs, covering 28 municipalities. The POST teams conduct home-based outreach with individuals who experienced an opioid-related overdose to provide a menu of services, including naloxone rescue kits, overdose response and risk reduction planning, referral to treatment for substance use disorders, including medication for opioid use disorder, and referral to recovery and family supports. EVALUATION From October 2017 to October 2021, the POST teams attempted to reach 5634 overdose survivors via 10 536 outreach visits. Teams successfully engaged 3014 survivors, either directly or through contact with their social network (53.5% success rate). Using data from a real-time encounter-level database, monthly peer-sharing calls with program sites, and annual site visits, we describe the implementation of the POST initiative and provide practice-based recommendations and lessons learned. DISCUSSION Early evidence suggests that the POST initiative is meeting its goal to engage overdose survivors, improve general health, and reduce subsequent overdose risk. Future evaluations should examine long-term outcomes among participants, including service linkages and incremental behavior change.
Collapse
|
10
|
Improving Partnerships Between Public Health and Public Safety to Reduce Overdose Deaths: An Inventory From the CDC Overdose Data to Action Funding Initiative. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2022; 28:S279-S285. [PMID: 36194795 PMCID: PMC9531979 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Rates of drug overdose deaths are high and growing. Innovative strategies, such as partnerships between public health and public safety (PH/PS) agencies, are needed to curb these trends. Support for PH/PS partnerships as an overdose prevention strategy is growing; however, little information exists on the makeup of activities within this strategy. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) cooperative agreement supports innovative and comprehensive overdose surveillance and prevention activities across the United States. Within OD2A, funded states, counties/cities, and territories may implement PH/PS partnerships to reduce overdose deaths. An inventory of PH/PS activities described in OD2A recipients' year 2 annual progress reports was conducted. These activities were abstracted for PH/PS partners' roles, intended audience, deliverables, objectives, stage of overdose risk addressed, and type of strategy implemented. The inventory revealed that 49 of the 66 funded jurisdictions planned 109 PH/PS activities. Most aimed to bridge knowledge, data, and service gaps and intervened at higher levels of overdose risk. This analysis highlights opportunities to adapt and expand cross-sector overdose prevention efforts across the overdose risk continuum.
Collapse
|
11
|
Law Enforcement and Community Provision of Fentanyl Test Strips to People Who Use Drugs for Engagement and Referral to Services. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2022; 28:S343-S346. [PMID: 36194804 PMCID: PMC9531966 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Use of fentanyl test strips (FTS) to test illicit drugs has been shown to be an effective harm-reduction tool for raising awareness of fentanyl risks, increased self-efficacy to prevent overdose, and safer use behavior changes. From March to June 2020, a total of 6 Massachusetts municipal police departments piloted FTS kit distribution during post-overdose outreach visits, community outreach, and related programming. The Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative developed the kits, trained departments, and oversaw implementation. The pilot evaluation involved site observations, process measures, and interviews with staff and kit recipients. For every kit distributed, there was approximately 1 health or support service or referral provided; 320 kits were distributed. Key themes from interviews were conceptualizing FTS as a tool, collaborations, and adaptations. Police departments that partnered with community programs amplified project reach. FTS distribution is a simple yet powerful tool that community providers and police can offer alongside linkage to care services and engagement with people who use drugs and their family and friends.
Collapse
|
12
|
Simmons J, Elliott L, Bennett AS, Beletsky L, Rajan S, Anders B, Dastparvardeh N. Evaluation of an Experimental Web-based Educational Module on Opioid-related Occupational Safety Among Police Officers: Protocol for a Randomized Pragmatic Trial to Minimize Barriers to Overdose Response. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e33451. [PMID: 35212639 PMCID: PMC8917434 DOI: 10.2196/33451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As drug-related morbidity and mortality continue to surge, police officers are on the front lines of the North American overdose (OD) crisis. Drug law enforcement shapes health risks among people who use drugs (PWUD), while also impacting the occupational health and wellness of officers. Effective interventions to align law enforcement practices with public health and occupational safety goals remain underresearched. OBJECTIVE The Opioids and Police Safety Study (OPS) aims to shift police practices relating to PWUD. It adapts and evaluates the relative effectiveness of a curriculum that bundles content on public health promotion with occupational risk reduction (ORR) to supplement a web-based OD response and naloxone training platform (GetNaloxoneNow.org, or GNN). This novel approach has the potential to improve public health and occupational safety practices, including using naloxone to reverse ODs, referring PWUD to treatment and other supportive services, and avoiding syringe confiscation. METHODS This longitudinal study uses a randomized pragmatic trial design. A sample of 300 active-duty police officers from select counties in Pennsylvania, Vermont, and New Hampshire with high OD fatality rates will be randomized (n=150 each) to either the experimental arm (GNN + OPS) or the control arm (GNN + COVID-19 ORR). A pre- and posttraining survey will be administered to all 300 officers, after which they will be administered quarterly surveys for 12 months. A subsample of police officers will also be qualitatively followed in a simultaneous embedded mixed-methods approach. Research ethics approval was obtained from the New York University Institutional Review Board. RESULTS Results will provide an understanding of the experiences, knowledge, and perceptions of this sample of law enforcement personnel. Generalized linear models will be used to analyze differences in key behavioral outcomes between the participants in each of the 2 study arms and across multiple time points (anticipated minimum effect size to be detected, d=0.50). Findings will be disseminated widely, and the training products will be available nationally once the study is completed. CONCLUSIONS The OPS is the first study to longitudinally assess the impact of a web-based opioid-related ORR intervention for law enforcement in the U.S. Our randomized pragmatic clinical trial aims to remove barriers to life-saving police engagement with PWUD/people who inject drugs by focusing both on the safety of law enforcement and evidence-based and best practices for working with persons at risk of an opioid OD. Our simultaneous embedded mixed-methods approach will provide empirical evaluation of the diffusion of the naloxone-based response among law enforcement. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrail.gov NCT05008523; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05008523. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/33451.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janie Simmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Luther Elliott
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alex S Bennett
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Leo Beletsky
- School of Law and Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sonali Rajan
- Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Nicole Dastparvardeh
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smiley-McDonald HM, Attaway PR, Richardson NJ, Davidson PJ, Kral AH. Perspectives from law enforcement officers who respond to overdose calls for service and administer naloxone. HEALTH & JUSTICE 2022; 10:9. [PMID: 35212812 PMCID: PMC8874742 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-022-00172-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many law enforcement agencies across the United States equip their officers with the life-saving drug naloxone to reverse the effects of an opioid overdose. Although officers can be effectively trained to administer naloxone, and hundreds of law enforcement agencies carry naloxone to reverse overdoses, little is known about what happens on scene during an overdose call for service from an officer's perspective, including what officers perceive their duties and responsibilities to be as the incident evolves. METHODS The qualitative study examined officers' experiences with overdose response, their perceived roles, and what happens on scene before, during, and after an overdose incident. In-person interviews were conducted with 17 officers in four diverse law enforcement agencies in the United States between January and May 2020. RESULTS Following an overdose, the officers described that overdose victims are required to go to a hospital or they are taken to jail. Officers also described their duties on scene during and after naloxone administration, including searching the belongings of the person who overdosed and seizing any drug paraphernalia. CONCLUSION These findings point to a pressing need for rethinking standard operating procedures for law enforcement in these situations so that the intentions of Good Samaritan Laws are upheld and people get the assistance they need without being deterred from asking for future help.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope M Smiley-McDonald
- Division for Applied Justice Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Peyton R Attaway
- Division for Applied Justice Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicholas J Richardson
- Division for Applied Justice Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter J Davidson
- Department of Medicine, Division Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alex H Kral
- Community Health Research Division, RTI International, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tori ME, Cummins E, Beletsky L, Schoenberger SF, Lambert AM, Yan S, Carroll JJ, Formica SW, Green TC, Apsler R, Xuan Z, Walley AY. Warrant checking practices by post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts: A mixed-methods study. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 100:103483. [PMID: 34700251 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-overdose outreach programs engage survivors in harm reduction and treatment to prevent future overdoses. In Massachusetts, these emerging programs commonly deploy teams comprised of police and public health professionals based on 911 call information. Some teams use name/address data to conduct arrest warrant checks prior to outreach visits. We used mixed methods to understand approaches to outreach related to warrant checking, from the perspectives of police and public health outreach agencies and staff. METHODS We analyzed a 2019 statewide survey of post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts to classify approaches to warrant checking and identify program and community factors associated with particular approaches. Ethnographic analysis of qualitative interviews conducted with outreach staff helped further contextualize outreach program practices related to warrants. RESULTS A majority (57% - 79/138) of post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts conducted warrant checks prior to outreach. Among programs that checked warrants, we formulated a taxonomy of approaches to handling warrants: 1) performing outreach without addressing warrants (19.6% - 27/138), 2) delaying outreach until warrants are cleared (15.9% - 22/138), 3) arresting the survivor (11/138 - 8.0%), 4) taking a situational approach (10/138 - 7.2%), 5) not performing outreach (9/138 - 6.5%). Program characteristics and staff training did not vary across approaches. From police and public health outreach staff interviews (n = 38), we elicited four major themes: a) diverse motivations precede warrant checking, b) police officers feel tension between dual roles, c) warrants alter approaches to outreach, and d) teams leverage warrants in relationships. Findings from both analyses converged to demonstrate unintended consequences of warrant checking. CONCLUSION Checking warrants prior to post-overdose outreach visits can result in arrest, delayed outreach, and barriers to obtaining services for overdose survivors, which can undermine the goal of these programs to engage overdose survivors. With the public health imperative of engaging overdose survivors, programs should consider limiting warrant checking and police participation in field activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco E Tori
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Emily Cummins
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Northeastern University School of Law and Bouvé College of Health Sciences, 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Health in Justice Action Lab, Northeastern University, 416 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Samantha F Schoenberger
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Audrey M Lambert
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Shapei Yan
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Jennifer J Carroll
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University, 10 Current Drive, Raleigh, NC 27605, United States; Department of Medicine, Brown University 222 Richmond St. Providence, RI 02903, United States
| | - Scott W Formica
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc., 21-C Cambridge St., Burlington, MA 01803, United States
| | - Traci C Green
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Institute for Behavioral Health, 415 South Street MS 035, Waltham, MA 02453, United States
| | - Robert Apsler
- Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc., 21-C Cambridge St., Burlington, MA 01803, United States
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Crosstown Building - CT 454, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Swann WL, DiNardi M, Schreiber TL. Association Between Interorganizational Collaboration in Opioid Response and Treatment Capacity for Opioid Use Disorder in Counties of Five States: A Cross-Sectional Study. Subst Abuse 2022; 16:11782218221111949. [PMID: 35845967 PMCID: PMC9284196 DOI: 10.1177/11782218221111949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Local governments on the front lines of the opioid epidemic often collaborate
across organizations to achieve a more comprehensive opioid response.
Collaboration is especially important in rural communities, which can lack
capacity for addressing health crises, yet little is known about how local
collaboration in opioid response relates to key outputs like treatment
capacity. Purpose: This cross-sectional study examined the association between local
governments’ interorganizational collaboration activity and agonist
treatment capacity for opioid use disorder (OUD), and whether this
association was stronger for rural than for metropolitan communities. Methods: Data on the location of facilities providing buprenorphine and methadone were
merged with a 2019 survey of all 358 counties in 5 states (CO, NC, OH, PA,
and WA) that inquired about their collaboration activity for opioid
response. Regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of a
collaboration activity index and its constituent items on the capacity to
provide buprenorphine or methadone in a county and whether this differed by
urbanicity. Results: A response rate of 47.8% yielded an analytic sample of n = 171 counties,
including 77 metropolitan, 50 micropolitan, and 44 rural counties.
Controlling for covariates, a 1-unit increase in the collaboration activity
index was associated with 0.155 (95% CI = 0.005, 0.304) more methadone
facilities, ie, opioid treatment programs (OTPs), per 100 000 population. An
interaction model indicated this association was stronger for rural (average
marginal effect = 0.354, 95% CI = 0.110, 0.599) than for non-rural counties.
Separate models revealed intergovernmental data and information sharing,
formal agreements, and organizational reforms were driving the above
associations. Collaboration activity did not vary with the capacity to
provide buprenorphine at non-OTP facilities. Spatial models used to account
for spatial dependence occurring with OUD treatment capacity showed similar
results. Conclusion: Rural communities may be able to leverage collaborations in opioid response
to expand treatment capacity through OTPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William L Swann
- School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Michael DiNardi
- Department of Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|