|
1
|
Earnshaw VA, Sepucha KR, Laurenceau JP, Subramanian SV, Hill EC, Wallace J, Brousseau NM, Henderson C, Brohan E, Morrison LM, Kelly JF. Disclosing Recovery: A pilot randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid to improve disclosure processes for people in treatment for opioid use disorder. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 160:209291. [PMID: 38272118 PMCID: PMC11060902 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) report struggling with whether and how to disclose, or share information about their OUD history and/or treatment with others. Yet, disclosure can act as a gateway to re-establishing social connection and support during recovery. The current study describes a pilot randomized controlled trial of Disclosing Recovery: A Decision Aid and Toolkit, a patient decision aid designed to facilitate disclosure decisions and build disclosure skills. METHODS Participants (n = 50) were recruited from a community-based behavioral health organization in 2021-2022 and randomized to receive the Disclosing Recovery intervention versus an attention-control comparator. They responded to surveys immediately after receiving the intervention as well as one month following the intervention at a follow-up appointment. Primary outcome analyses examined indicators of implementation of the intervention to inform a future efficacy trial. Secondary outcome analyses explored impacts of the intervention on the decision-making process, disclosure rates, and relationships. RESULTS Participants were successfully recruited, randomized, and retained, increasing confidence in the feasibility of future efficacy trials to test the Disclosing Recovery intervention. Moreover, participants in the Disclosing Recovery intervention agreed that the intervention is acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. They additionally reported a higher quality of their decision-making process and decisions than participants in the comparator condition. At their follow-up appointment, participants with illicit opioid use who received the Disclosing Recovery intervention were less likely to disclose than those who received the comparator condition. Moreover, significant interactions between illicit opioid use and the intervention condition indicated that participants without illicit opioid use who received the Disclosing Recovery intervention reported greater closeness to and social support from their planned disclosure recipient than those who received the comparator condition. CONCLUSIONS The Disclosing Recovery intervention appears to be an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate patient decision aid for addressing disclosure processes among people in treatment for OUD. Moreover, preliminary results suggest that it shows promise in improving relationship closeness and social support in patients without illicit opioid use. More testing is merited to determine the intervention's efficacy and effectiveness in improving relationship and treatment outcomes for people in treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie A Earnshaw
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, 111 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - Karen R Sepucha
- Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Jean-Philippe Laurenceau
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 231 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - S V Subramanian
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - E Carly Hill
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, 111 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Center for Research on Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, 125 Academy Street, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - James Wallace
- Center for Research on Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, 125 Academy Street, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Delaware, 100 Discovery Blvd, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
| | - Natalie M Brousseau
- Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
| | - Claire Henderson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
| | - Elaine Brohan
- Health Services and Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
| | - Lynn M Morrison
- Brandywine Counseling and Community Services, 2713 Lancaster Avenue, Wilmington, DE 19805, USA.
| | - John F Kelly
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Predictors of Frequent Emergency Department Use and Hospitalization among Patients with Substance-Related Disorders Recruited in Addiction Treatment Centers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19116607. [PMID: 35682194 PMCID: PMC9180458 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have assessed the overall impact of outpatient service use on acute care use, comparing patients with different types of substance-related disorders (SRD) and multimorbidity. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and outpatient service use that predicted both frequent ED use (3+ visits/year) and hospitalization among patients with SRD. Data emanated from 14 Quebec (Canada) addiction treatment centers. Quebec administrative health databases were analyzed for a cohort of 17,819 patients over a 7-year period. Multivariable logistic regression models were produced. Patients with polysubstance-related disorders, co-occurring SRD-mental disorders, severe chronic physical illnesses, and suicidal behaviors were at highest risk of both frequent ED use and hospitalization. Having a history of homelessness, residing in rural areas, and using more outpatient services also increased the risk of acute care use, whereas high continuity of physician care protected against acute care use. Serious health problems were the main predictor for increased risk of both frequent ED use and hospitalization among patients with SRD, whereas high continuity of care was a protective factor. Improved quality of care, motivational, outreach and crisis interventions, and more integrated and collaborative care are suggested for reducing acute care use.
Collapse
|