Physicians' experiences with buprenorphine: A qualitative study of motivations for becoming X waivered and barriers to and facilitators of prescribing the medication for opioid use disorder

Effect of the Communities that HEAL intervention on receipt of behavioral therapies for opioid use disorder: A cluster randomized wait-list controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The U.S. opioid overdose crisis persists. Outpatient behavioral health services (BHS) are essential components of a comprehensive response to opioid use disorder and overdose fatalities. The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term® (HEALing) Communities Study developed the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention to reduce opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities in Kentucky, Ohio, New York, and Massachusetts through the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs), including BHS. This paper compares the rate of individuals receiving outpatient BHS in Wave 1 intervention communities (n = 34) to waitlisted Wave 2 communities (n = 33).

METHODS

Medicaid data included individuals ≥18 years of age receiving any of five BHS categories: intensive outpatient, outpatient, case management, peer support, and case management or peer support. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate of receiving each BHS for Wave 1 and Wave 2. Effect modification analyses evaluated changes in the effect of the CTH intervention between Wave 1 and Wave 2 by research site, rurality, age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected between intervention and waitlisted communities in the rate of individuals receiving any of the five BHS categories. None of the interaction effects used to test the effect modification were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors should be considered when interpreting results-no significant intervention effects were observed through Medicaid claims data, the best available data source but limited in terms of capturing individuals reached by the intervention. Also, the 12-month evaluation window may have been too brief to see improved outcomes considering the time required to stand-up BHS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: Identifier: NCT04111939.

Evaluation of medications used for opioid use disorder in emergency departments: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

INTRODUCTION

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant health issue impacting millions in the United States (US). Medications used for OUD (MOUD) (e.g., buprenorphine, methadone, naltrexone) and medications for overdose and symptom management (e.g., naloxone, clonidine) have been shown to be safe and effective tools in clinical management. MOUD therapy in Emergency Departments (EDs) improves patient outcomes and enhances engagement with formal addiction treatment; however, provider factors and institutional barriers have created hurdles to ED-based MOUD treatment and heterogeneity in ED based OUD care. We used a nationally representative dataset, the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to characterize MOUD prescribing practices across patient demographics, geographic regions, payers, providers, and comorbidities in EDs.

METHODS

NHAMCS is a survey conducted by the US Census Bureau assessing utilization of ambulatory healthcare services nationally. Survey staff compile encounter records from a nationally representative sample of EDs. We conducted a cross-sectional study using this data to assess visits in 2020 among patients aged 18-64 presenting with an opioid overdose or OUD. We estimated the proportion of patients who had any MOUD, clonidine, or naloxone treatment and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We modeled the association between patient demographic, location, comorbidities, and provider characteristics with receipt of MOUD treatment as unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI.

RESULTS

There was a weighted frequency of 469,434 patients who were discharged from EDs after being seen for OUD or overdose. Naloxone, clonidine, and buprenorphine were the most frequent treatments administered and/or prescribed for OUDs or overdose. Overall, 54,123 (11.5%, 95%CI 0-128,977) patients who were discharged from the ED for OUDs or overdose received at least one type of MOUD. Hispanic race, (OR 17.9, 95%CI 1.33-241.90) and Western region (OR43.77, 95%CI 2.97-645.27) were associated with increased odds of receiving MOUDs, while arrival by ambulance was associated with decreased odds of receiving MOUDs (OR0.01, 95%CI 0.001-0.19). Being seen by an APP or physician assistant was associated with MOUD treatment (OR 16.68, 95%CI: 1.41-152.33; OR: 13.84, 95%CI: 3.58-53.51, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings suggest that MOUD and other medications for opioid overdose are infrequently used in the ED setting. This finding was especially notable in race, geographic region, mode of arrival, and those seen by APP, underscoring the need for further study into the root causes of these disparities. Our study provides a foundational understanding of MOUD patterns, guiding future research as the landscape of OUD treatment continues to shift.

Differences in buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care professionals with and without X-waiver training in the US

BACKGROUND

Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are effective at preventing overdose and infectious disease but are vastly under-prescribed in the US. For decades, prescribers faced additional training and regulation to prescribe buprenorphine which stigmatized the medication and lessened support for a harm reduction approach to treating opioid use disorder. The Drug Enforcement Administration removed the X-waiver requirement for prescribing buprenorphine in late 2022, which removed stigma and lessened important barriers to prescribing but also left training at the discretion of individual organizations. Our study aimed to assess differences in knowledge, confidence, and stigma regarding buprenorphine between those who went through the X-waiver training and those who did not, among practicing primary care providers (PCPs).

METHODS

We assessed buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care aligned outpatient providers in Ohio, USA. Using survey data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses predicting primary prescribing outcomes. Primary outcomes measured knowledge of and confidence in buprenorphine, as well as perceived adequacy of one's training. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward patients with OUD, including bias toward OUD patients, stress when working with them, and empathy toward them. Participants (n = 403) included physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants practicing in primary care aligned disciplines.

RESULTS

Survey data showed that PCPs who received X-waiver training were more likely to understand and have confidence in the mechanism of buprenorphine, and consider their training on treating OUD to be adequate. PCPs with an X-waiver showed more empathy, less negative bias, and experienced less stress when working with patients with OUD.

CONCLUSION

Removing restrictive policies for prescribing buprenorphine is an important step to expanding access and reducing the stigma associated with opioid use disorder treatment. Yet, our findings suggest that the training received alongside regulation may be important for improving prescribing confidence and reducing stigma. Strategies to increase buprenorphine prescribing are unlikely to be effective without also expanding access to prescribing support for primary care providers across the career course.

Mental health and substance use disorder comorbidities among Medicaid beneficiaries: Associations with opioid use disorder and prescription opioid misuse

Background

Medicaid presently insures about one-fourth of the US population and disproportionately insures about 38 % of non-elderly adults with an opioid use disorder (OUD). Owing to Medicaid's prominent role insuring persons with an OUD and that Medicaid coverage includes pharmaceutical benefits, there has been considerable interest in studying potential prescription opioid misuse among Medicaid beneficiaries and identifying subpopulations at higher risk for misuse and possible progression to an OUD.

Methods

The study goals were to explore the associations among prescription opioid misuse, OUD, and co-occurring mental health and other substance use disorders (SUD). We analyzed Illinois Medicaid 2018 claims data for 1102479 adult beneficiaries 18 to 64 years of age. Using algorithms based on previous studies, we first determined either the presence or absence of nine SUDS (including OUD), nine mental health disorders and likely prescription opioid misuse. Then, we subdivided the beneficiary sample into five groups: those who were prescribed opioids and evidenced either no, possible, or probable misuse; those evidencing an OUD; and those evidencing no opioid use or misuse.

Results

Bivariate analyses, upset plots, and multinomial logistic regressions were used to compare the five subgroups on the prevalence of co-occurring SUDS and mental health disorders. Those with an OUD or with probable prescription opioid misuse had the highest prevalence of most co-occurring conditions with beneficiaries with an OUD the most likely to evidence co-occurring SUDS, particularly tobacco use disorder, whereas those with probable misuse had elevated prevalence rates of co-occurring mental health disorders comparable to those with an OUD.

Conclusion

The medical complexity of persons with an OUD or misusing prescription opioids are considered in light of recent attempts to expand buprenorphine provision as a medication for OUD among Medicaid beneficiaries. Additionally, we consider the possibility of gender, co-occurring mental health disorders, and tobacco use disorder as important risk factors for progressing to prescription opioid misuse and an OUD.