1
|
Ivsins A, Bonn M, McNeil R, Boyd J, Kerr T. A qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs in Vancouver, British Columbia. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 258:111275. [PMID: 38581922 PMCID: PMC11088499 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking unregulated drugs has increased substantially in British Columbia. Intersecting with the ongoing overdose crisis, drug smoking-related overdose fatalities have correspondingly surged. However, little is known about the experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs accessing the toxic drug supply. This study explores perceptions and experiences of overdose among people who smoke drugs. METHODS We conducted interviews with 31 people who smoke drugs. Interviews covered a range of topics including overdose experience. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes related to participant perceptions and experiences of smoking-related overdose. RESULTS Some participants perceived smoking drugs to pose lower overdose risk relative to injecting drugs. Participants reported smoking-related overdose experiences, including from underestimating the potency of drugs, the cross-contamination of stimulants with opioids, and responding to smoking-related overdose events. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the impact the unpredictable, unregulated, and toxic drug supply is having on people who smoke drugs, both among people who use opioids, and among those who primarily use stimulants. Efforts to address smoking-related overdose could benefit from expanding supervised smoking sites, working with people who use drugs to disseminate accurate knowledge around smoking-related overdose risk, and offering a smokable alternative to the unpredictable drug supply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Ivsins
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Matt Bonn
- Canadian AIDS Society, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ryan McNeil
- General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Social & Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jade Boyd
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tapper A, Ahern C, Graveline-Long Z, Newberger NG, Hughto JMW. The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:160. [PMID: 37891658 PMCID: PMC10612300 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00875-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing sterile drug smoking materials to people who use drugs can prevent the acquisition of infectious diseases and reduce overdose risk. However, there is a lack of understanding of how these practices are being implemented and received by people who use drugs globally. METHODS A systematic review of safer smoking practices was conducted by searching PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase for relevant peer-reviewed, English-language publications from inception or the availability of online manuscripts through December 2022. RESULTS Overall, 32 peer-reviewed papers from six countries were included. 30 studies exclusively included people who use drugs as participants (n = 11 people who use drugs; generally, n = 17 people who smoke drugs, n = 2 people who inject drugs). One study included program staff serving people who use drugs, and one study included staff and people who use drugs. Sharing smoking equipment (e.g., pipes) was reported in 25 studies. People who use drugs in several studies reported that pipe sharing occurred for multiple reasons, including wanting to accumulate crack resin and protect themselves from social harms, such as police harassment. Across studies, smoking drugs, as opposed to injecting drugs, were described as a crucial method to reduce the risk of overdose, disease acquisition, and societal harms such as police violence. Ten studies found that when people who use drugs were provided with safer smoking materials, they engaged in fewer risky drug use behaviors (e.g., pipe sharing, using broken pipes) and showed improved health outcomes. However, participants across 11 studies reported barriers to accessing safer smoking services. Solutions to overcoming safer smoking access barriers were described in 17 studies and included utilizing peer workers and providing safer smoking materials to those who asked. CONCLUSION This global review found that safer smoking practices are essential forms of harm reduction. International policies must be amended to help increase access to these essential tools. Additional research is also needed to evaluate the efficacy of and access to safer smoking services, particularly in the U.S. and other similar countries, where such practices are being implemented but have not been empirically studied in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Noam G Newberger
- Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jaclyn M W Hughto
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diak BJ, Miskovic M, Zurba N, Beaumont D. Not all screens are created equal: examination of surface features and other physical properties of commonly used screen materials for smoking drugs. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:68. [PMID: 37221542 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00794-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brass screens are considered an essential part of the safer drug smoking/inhalation supplies and are widely distributed by harm reduction programs in Canada. However, the use of commercially available steel wools as screens for smoking crack cocaine remains a common practice among people who smoke drugs in Canada. Use of these steel wool materials is associated with different adverse effects on health. This study aims to determine what changes folding and heating have on several filter materials, including brass screens and commercially available steel wool products, and examine the implications of these changes on health of people who smoke drugs. METHODS This study investigated the microscopic differences, studied by optical and scanning electron microscopy, between four screen and four steel wool filter materials used in a simulated drug consumption process. New materials were manipulated, compacted into its own Pyrex® straight stem using a push stick and then heated with a butane lighter simulating a common method in preparing drugs for consumption. The materials were studied in the as-received (new), as-pressed (compressed and inserted into the stem tube but without heating) and as-heated (compressed and inserted into the stem tube and heated with a butane lighter) conditions. RESULTS The steel wool materials with the smallest wire thicknesses were found to be the easiest to prepare for pipe use, but degrade significantly during shaping and heating, making them wholly unsuitable as a safe filter material. In contrast the brass and stainless steel screen materials remain mostly unchanged by the simulated drug consumption process. After the stainless steel pellet screen, the Brass Impact 2.0 screen material had the best characteristics of the materials tested due to its mesh wire diameter, pitch, alloy choice and its pre-strained state. CONCLUSION Commonly used steel wool alternatives degrade during the handling and stem insertion, and heating the screens in the stem. Debris is generated by wool deformation on insertion and after heating that easily separates from the screen and can be inhaled during drug consumption. The brass and stainless steel screen materials are safer to use as they remain mostly stable during the simulated drug consumption process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Diak
- Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Nicol Hall, 60 Union Street, Kingston, ON, K7L-3N6, Canada
| | - Miroslav Miskovic
- Ontario Harm Reduction Distribution Program, Kingston Community Health Centres, 115 Barrack St - Suite 200, Kingston, ON, K7K 1G2, Canada.
| | - Nadia Zurba
- Ontario Harm Reduction Distribution Program, Kingston Community Health Centres, 115 Barrack St - Suite 200, Kingston, ON, K7K 1G2, Canada
| | - Denise Beaumont
- Ontario Harm Reduction Distribution Program, Kingston Community Health Centres, 115 Barrack St - Suite 200, Kingston, ON, K7K 1G2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Høj SB, Jacka B, Minoyan N, Bussière P, Bruneau J. Deconstructing the 'cheque effect': short-term changes in injection drug use after receiving income assistance and associated factors. Addiction 2021; 116:571-582. [PMID: 32649010 DOI: 10.1111/add.15192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Disbursement of income assistance has been temporally associated with intensified drug use and related harms (coined the 'cheque effect'). However, relationships to injection drug use (IDU) remain understudied. We examined short-term 'cheque effects' and associated factors among people who inject drugs (PWID). DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis nested within a cohort study. SETTING Montreal, Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS PWID receiving income assistance, with no employment income. A total of 613 PWID (median age 41, 83% male) contributed 3269 observations from 2011 to 2017. MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS At each cohort visit, an interviewer-administered questionnaire captured retrospective reports of injection-related behaviour during the 2-day periods (i) before and (ii) including/after receiving last month's income assistance payment (number of injections; drugs injected; any receptive syringe-sharing). The relative likelihood (odds) and magnitude (rate) of an increase in injection frequency ('cheque effect') were estimated in relation to social and behavioural factors using logistic and negative binomial regression in a covariate-adjusted two-part model. FINDINGS Prevalence of IDU and syringe-sharing were, respectively, 1.80 and 2.50 times higher in the days following versus preceding cheque receipt (P < 0.001). Among people with past-month IDU, most observations showed increased injection frequency (52%) or no change in injection frequency (44%). The likelihood of a 'cheque effect' was positively associated with cocaine injection [versus injection of other substances, odds ratio (OR) = 2.639, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.04-3.41], unstable housing (OR = 1.272, 95% CI = 1.03-1.57) and receiving opioid agonist therapy (OR =1.597, 95% CI = 1.27-2.00) during the same month. Magnitude of the 'cheque effect' was positively associated with cocaine injection [rate ratio (RR) = 1.795, 95% CI = 1.43-2.16], unstable housing (RR = 1.198, 95% CI = 1.02-1.38) and frequent injection (RR = 2.938, 95% CI = 2.43-3.44), but inversely associated with opioid agonist therapy (RR = 0.817, 95% CI = 0.68-0.95) and prescription opioid injection (RR = 0.794, 95% CI = 0.66-0.93). CONCLUSION Among people who inject drugs in Montreal, Canada, injection drug use and receptive syringe-sharing appear to be more prevalent in the 2 days after versus before receiving income assistance. The odds and rate of individual-level increases in injection frequency appear to be positively associated with cocaine injection (versus injection of other substances) and unstable housing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Bordier Høj
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Brendan Jacka
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Nanor Minoyan
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Phélix Bussière
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Julie Bruneau
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.,Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rigoni R, Woods S, Breeksema JJ. From opiates to methamphetamine: building new harm reduction responses in Jakarta, Indonesia. Harm Reduct J 2019; 16:67. [PMID: 31829253 PMCID: PMC6907268 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0341-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the rise of stimulant use, most harm reduction programs still focus on people who inject opioids, leaving many people who use methamphetamine (PWUM) underserviced. In Asia, especially, where methamphetamine prevalence has overtaken opioids prevalence, harm reduction programs assisting PWUM are rare. The few existing innovative practices focusing on methamphetamine use lie underreported. Understanding how these programs moved their focus from opiates to methamphetamine could help inspire new harm reduction responses. Hence, this paper analyzes a newly implemented outreach program assisting methamphetamine users in Jakarta, Indonesia. It addresses the program's critical learning points when making the transition to respond to stimulant use. METHODS This case study is part of a more extensive research on good practices of harm reduction for stimulant use. For this case study, data was collected through Indonesian contextual documents and documents from the program, structured questionnaire, in-depth interviews with service staff and service users, a focus group discussion with service users, and in-loco observations of activities. For this paper, data was reinterpreted to focus on the key topics that needed to be addressed when the program transitioned from working with people who use opioids to PWUM. RESULTS Four key topics were found: (1) getting in touch with different types of PWUM and building trust relationships; (2) adapting safer smoking kits to local circumstances; (3) reframing partnerships while finding ways to address mental health issues; and (4) responding to local law enforcement practices. CONCLUSIONS The meaningful involvement of PWUM was essential in the development and evaluation of outreach work, the planning, and the adaptation of safer smoking kits to local circumstances. Also, it helped to gain understanding of the broader needs of PWUM, including mental health care and their difficulties related to law enforcement activities. Operating under a broad harm reduction definition and addressing a broad spectrum of individual and social needs are preferable to focusing solely on specific interventions and supplies for safer drug use. Since many PWUM smoke rather than inject, securing funding for harm reduction focused on people who do not inject drugs and/or who do not use opioids is fundamental in keeping programs sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafaela Rigoni
- Mainline Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of History and Art History, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Sara Woods
- Mainline Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joost J Breeksema
- University Center of Psychiatry, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|