1
|
Kesavadev J, Basanth A, Krishnan G, Shankar A, Sanal G, Jothydev S. Real-World User and Clinician Perspective and Experience with MiniMed™ 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop System. Diabetes Ther 2023:10.1007/s13300-023-01427-z. [PMID: 37278948 PMCID: PMC10299959 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01427-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) MiniMed™ 780G system changes basal insulin delivery every 5 min and auto bolus in response to sensor glucose values. We assessed the performance of the AHCL system in real-world settings for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) as well as user and clinician perspectives and satisfaction. METHODS We held two peer group discussions: one having adults with T1DM/parents of children and adolescents with T1DM to understand their experiences with the AHCL system and another with healthcare providers (HCPs). Responses from the discussions were analyzed and categorized into themes by two independent researchers, with any inconsistencies resolved by consensus. We also analyzed data from the system uploaded to CareLink personal software. Glycemic outcomes, including time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), time above range (TAR), mean sensor glucose (SG) levels, glucose management indicator (GMI), sensor use, and percentage of time spent in AHCL, were determined. RESULTS The peer group discussions revealed numerous key themes and issues for each group, such as the significance of setting reasonable expectations, carbohydrate counting and bolus dosing, technical difficulties, and overall user experience. The users (n = 25; T1DM; 17 female; age 13.8 ± 7.49 years; A1C 6.54 ± 0.45%; duration of diabetes 6 ± 6.78 years) were very satisfied with the system. Most users experienced consistent blood glucose values with very few hypoglycemic episodes. However, there were a few limitations reported, such as hyperglycemic episodes caused by inaccuracies in carb counting, issues with sensor connectivity, and cannula blockages or kinking for those using insulin Fiasp. Users achieved a mean GMI of 6.4 ± 0.26%, TIR of 83.0 ± 8.12%, TBR (54-70 mg/dL) of 2.0 ± 0.81%, TBR* (< 54 mg/dL) of 0%. All of the users achieved a TIR of > 70%. CONCLUSION The use of the AHCL system in T1DM resulted in robust glycemic control, minimizing hypoglycemia. Providing training to both users and HCPs can help them use the system effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jothydev Kesavadev
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India.
| | - Anjana Basanth
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
| | - Gopika Krishnan
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
| | - Arun Shankar
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
| | - Geethu Sanal
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
| | - Sunitha Jothydev
- Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center, JDC Junction, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Twigg S, Lim S, Yoo SH, Chen L, Bao Y, Kong A, Yeoh E, Chan SP, Robles J, Mohan V, Cohen N, McGill M, Ji L. Asia-Pacific Perspectives on the Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Optimizing Diabetes Management. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231176533. [PMID: 37232515 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231176533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes is prevalent, and it imposes a substantial public health burden globally and in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. The cornerstone for optimizing diabetes management and treatment outcomes is glucose monitoring, the techniques of which have evolved from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Contextual differences with Western populations and limited regionally generated clinical evidence warrant regional standards of diabetes care, including glucose monitoring in APAC. Hence, the APAC Diabetes Care Advisory Board convened to gather insights into clinician-reported CGM utilization for optimized glucose monitoring and diabetes management in the region. We discuss the findings from a pre-meeting survey and an expert panel meeting regarding glucose monitoring patterns and influencing factors, patient profiles for CGM initiation and continuation, CGM benefits, and CGM optimization challenges and potential solutions in APAC. While CGM is becoming the new standard of care and a useful adjunct to HbA1c and SMBG globally, glucose monitoring type, timing, and frequency should be individualized according to local and patient-specific contexts. The results of this APAC survey guide methods for the formulation of future APAC-specific consensus guidelines for the application of CGM in people living with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Twigg
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Soo Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Seung-Hyun Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Liming Chen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital and Tianjin Institute of Endocrinology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuqian Bao
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Alice Kong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Ester Yeoh
- Diabetes Centre, Admiralty Medical Centre and Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| | - Siew Pheng Chan
- Department of Medicine, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jeremyjones Robles
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chong Hua Hospital, Cebu, Philippines
| | - Viswanathan Mohan
- Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
| | - Neale Cohen
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret McGill
- Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine and Health, Diabetes Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Linong Ji
- Peking University Diabetes Center, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohan V, Joshi S, Mithal A, Kesavadev J, Unnikrishnan AG, Saboo B, Kumar P, Chawla M, Bhograj A, Kovil R. Expert Consensus Recommendations on Time in Range for Monitoring Glucose Levels in People with Diabetes: An Indian Perspective. Diabetes Ther 2023; 14:237-249. [PMID: 36705888 PMCID: PMC9943834 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01355-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Keeping up with the global scenario, diabetes prevalence is on rise in India. Inadequate glycemic control is a major cause of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. The conventional standards of care (SOC) in diabetes, including self-monitoring of blood glucose and measurement of glycated hemoglobin, have supported achievement of glycemic control, yet there are a few limitations. With the use of current technologies and metrics, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and standardized CGM data reporting, the continuous real-time glucose levels can be measured, and importantly, the percentage of time above, below, and within the target glucose range can be calculated, which facilitates patient-centric care, a current goal in diabetes management. International consensus recommendations endorse the incorporation of CGM and CGM data reporting in SOC for diabetes management. The guidelines provide time in range (TIR) thresholds for different patient populations and different types of diabetes. However, extrapolation of these global guidelines does not aptly cover the Indian population, which has diverse diet, culture, and religious practices. In this context, a consensus meeting was held in India in 2021 with experts in the field of diabetes care. The purpose of the meeting was to develop consensus recommendations for TIR thresholds for different patient profiles in India. Those expert recommendations, together with an evidence-based review, are reported here. The aim of this agreement is to aid clinicians across India to routinely use CGM and CGM data reports for optimizing individualized diabetes care, by implementing clinical targets for TIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shashank Joshi
- Department of Endocrinology, Lilavati Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Jothydev Kesavadev
- Department of Endocrinology, Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centres, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
| | - Ambika G Unnikrishnan
- Department of Endocrinology, Chellaram Hospital-Diabetes Care and Multispecialty, Bavdhan, Pune, India
| | - Banshi Saboo
- Department of Diabetology, Diabetes Care Hormone Clinic, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Prasanna Kumar
- Department of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Care, Kalyanangar, Bengaluru, India
| | - Manoj Chawla
- Department of Endocrinology, SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhijit Bhograj
- Department of Endocrinology, Manipal Hospital, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajiv Kovil
- Department of Diabetology, Dr. Kovil's Diabetes Care, Centre Andheri (West), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lim PC, Wong KL, Rajah R, Chong MF, Chow TS, Subramaniam S, Lee CY. Comparing the efficacy of tocilizumab with corticosteroid therapy in treating COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Daru 2022; 30:211-228. [PMID: 35084705 PMCID: PMC8792140 DOI: 10.1007/s40199-021-00430-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tocilizumab has shown equivocal outcomes in reducing mortality in COVID-19. The corticosteroids appear to be an affordable alternative to tocilizumab. This study aims to estimate the efficacy of tocilizumab and the corticosteroids particularly dexamethasone and methylprednisolone and to identify possible determinants of their efficacy. METHODS Five electronic databases were searched for studies involving tocilizumab, dexamethasone, and methylprednisolone in treating COVID-19. We included case-control and randomized or partially randomized trials. Meta-regression for patient baseline characteristics, co-medications, and tocilizumab dose regimens was performed to identify contributing factors to drug efficacy. RESULTS Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and twenty-four case-control studies were included in our meta-analysis involving 18,702 patients. Meta-analysis among the RCTs showed that a summary estimate favoring mortality reduction (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.55 - 0.92) contributed mainly by tocilizumab and dexamethasone. Among case-control studies, meta-analysis showed mortality reduction (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.36 - 0.75) contributed by tocilizumab and tocilizumab-methylprednisolone combination. Methylprednisolone alone did not reduce mortality except for one study involving high dose pulse therapy. Meta-analysis also found that all three drugs did not significantly reduce mechanical ventilation (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.32 - 1.60). CONCLUSION Tocilizumab and dexamethasone emerge as viable options in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. A tocilizumab-corticosteroid combination strategy may improve therapeutic outcome in cases where single therapy fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phei Ching Lim
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Pulau Pinang, 10990, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Kar Loon Wong
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Pulau Pinang, 10990, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Retha Rajah
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Seberang Jaya, 13700, Permatang Pauh, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Meng Fei Chong
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Pulau Pinang, 10990, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Ting Soo Chow
- Infectious Disease Unit, Medical Department, Hospital Pulau Pinang, 10990, George Town, Penang, Malaysia
| | | | - Chong Yew Lee
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Minden , Penang, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chadha M, Das AK, Deb P, Gangopadhyay KK, Joshi S, Kesavadev J, Kovil R, Kumar S, Misra A, Mohan V. Expert Opinion: Optimum Clinical Approach to Combination-Use of SGLT2i + DPP4i in the Indian Diabetes Setting. Diabetes Ther 2022; 13:1097-1114. [PMID: 35334083 PMCID: PMC8948458 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01219-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Asian-Indian phenotype of type 2 diabetes mellitus is uniquely characterized for cardio-metabolic risk. In the context of implementing patient-centric holistic cardio-metabolic risk management as a priority, the choice of various combinations of antidiabetic agents should be individualized. Combined therapy with two classes of antidiabetic agents, namely, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, target several pathophysiological pathways. The wide-ranging clinical outcomes associated with this combination, including improvement of glycemia and adiposity, reduction of metabolic and vascular risk, safety, and simplicity for sustainable compliance, are extremely relevant to the Asian Indian patient population living with T2DM. In this review we describe the available evidence in detail and present a rational practical guidance for the optimum clinical use of this combination in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Chadha
- Endocrinology, P.D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ashok Kumar Das
- Endocrinology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Science, Puducherry, India
| | - Prasun Deb
- Endocrinology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Shashank Joshi
- Endocrinology, Joshi Clinic and Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Rajiv Kovil
- Department of Diabetology, Dr Kovil’s Diabetes Care Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Anoop Misra
- Fortis-C-DOC Centre of Excellence for Diabetes, Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, National Diabetes, Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (N-DOC), Diabetes Foundation (India) (DFI), New Delhi, India
| | - Viswanathan Mohan
- Dr Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|