Examining early intervention referral patterns in neonatal intensive care unit follow up clinics using telemedicine during COVID-19

Evidence-Based Infant Assessment for Cerebral Palsy: Diagnosis Timelines and Intervention Access in a Newborn Follow-up Setting

Evidence-based assessment pathways inform early detection of cerebral palsy and access to intervention. This study investigated the relationships between early evidence-based assessments, diagnosis timeline, and rehabilitation intervention access in a population of children with cerebral palsy who were seen between 2010 and 2022 at the University of Wisconsin Waisman Center Newborn Follow Up Clinic. Cerebral palsy-specific assessments were increasingly integrated after the publication of early detection guidelines by Novak et al. in 2017. Age at cerebral palsy first mention (high risk for cerebral palsy) decreased over time, although age at diagnosis remained similar. Infants who received multiple evidence-based assessments were diagnosed at a younger age. Ninety-nine percent of children were referred to rehabilitation therapies before diagnosis. Infant age at referral to outpatient therapies decreased over time. This study provides novel clinical data on diagnosis timelines and identifies remaining gaps related to implementation feasibility toward improved early diagnosis and intervention access.

Evidence-Based Implementation of the Family-Centered Model and the Use of Tele-Intervention in Early Childhood Services: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to explore the evidence and efficacy of two trends in early childhood intervention services: the family-centered model and the use of tele-intervention.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA methodology and using three databases: Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus. The studies included were those aimed at children from 0 to 6 years of age, focused on early intervention, and which alluded to the family-centered model and/or tele-intervention.

RESULTS

a total of 33 studies were included. Five main themes were identified: (1) The participation of children and family is facilitated and improved by the family-centered model of care; (2) the feeling of competence, self-efficacy, satisfaction and empowerment in professionals and families have a positive impact on quality of life; (3) the use of tele-intervention as a tool for prevention and intervention; (4) preparation for telepractice can improve the development of commitment; (5) tele-intervention as a possible solution to contextual barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Tele-intervention in pediatrics is presented as a tool inherent to the family-centered model since its implementation involves several common strategies. Future lines of research should explore the use of this tool as a possible solution to contextual barriers.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early intervention utilization and need for referral after NICU discharge in VLBW infants

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on early intervention (EI) services in VLBW infants.

STUDY DESIGN

208 VLBW infants seen in NICU follow-up (FU) pre-COVID-19 were compared to 132 infants seen during COVID-19 at 4, 8 and 20 months corrected age (CA) in terms of enrollment in Child and Family Connections (CFC; intake agency for EI), EI therapies, need for CFC referral and Bayley scores.

RESULTS

Infants seen during COVID-19 at 4, 8 and 20 months CA were 3.4 (OR, 95% CI 1.64, 6.98), 4.0 (1.77, 8.95) and 4.8 (2.10, 11.08) times more likely to need CFC referral at FU based on severity of developmental delay. Infants followed during COVID-19 had significantly lower mean Bayley cognitive and language scores at 20 months CA.

CONCLUSIONS

VLBW infants seen during COVID-19 had significantly higher odds of needing EI and significantly lower cognitive and language scores at 20 months CA.

Virtual Visits for Developmental Screening in High-Risk Infants

INTRODUCTION

The High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program screens neonatal intensive care unit graduates for developmental delays and refers patients to physical, occupational, or speech therapy. At Kaiser Permanente Downey, the High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program assessed development via video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compares rates of enrollment in and referral to therapies and California Regional Center services between infants assessed by video visits and those assessed in person.

METHODS

Study participants included infants in the High-Risk Infant Follow-Up program between March 2020 and March 2021 with developmental assessments at adjusted ages 6, 12, and 18 months. Rates of enrollment in services and referral to physical, occupational, and speech therapy and Regional Center services were compared between infants assessed virtually and in person.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in rates of enrollment or referral to physical, occupational, or speech therapy services or Regional Center services. The rate of referral at any of the 3 visits was 8.6% at in-person visits and 10.9% at virtual visits (p = 0.49). Infants whose first visit was virtual were just as likely to complete all 3 developmental assessments as those whose first visit was in person.

DISCUSSION

The COVID-19 pandemic stay-at-home orders provided a "natural experiment" demonstrating the effectiveness of virtual visits as compared to in-person visits. Although the developmental assessment tool used was not standardized to be used virtually, virtual visits were just as likely to result in referrals to services and did not lead to loss of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Virtual visits may be useful and convenient for some families, but further study is required.