Distal Femoral Osteotomy: Lateral Opening Wedge Technique

Around-the-knee osteotomies part II: Surgical indications, techniques and outcomes - State of the art

Recent advances in surgical techniques and planning for knee-based osteotomies have led to improvements in addressing lower extremity malalignment. Part 1 of this review presented the biomechanical and clinical rationale of osteotomies, emphasizing the importance of osteotomies for restoring normal knee kinematics. In Part 2 of this review, indications, surgical technique and outcomes of osteotomies to correct coronal, sagittal and axial plane deformities will be examined. Traditional high tibial and distal femoral osteotomies will be discussed in addition to more recent advanced techniques including biplanar corrections and double-level osteotomies, as well as slope-correcting osteotomies. Patient-specific instrumentation and its use in more complex corrections will also be addressed.

Efficacy and Complications of Fixator-Assisted Correction with Internal Fixation in the Genu Valgum

Background and Purpose

Two basic methods for genu valgum correction are osteotomy and internal fixation or external fixator assited correction. External fixators have the advantage of stabilizing fragments before osteotomy allowing better control of fragments and preventing secondary displacements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of fixator assisted correction for genu valgum and internal fixation, using the AO distal femur pediatric osteotomy plate.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-six limbs in 26 patients (age 10-16 years) underwent osteotomy in the distal femur at CORA. Open lateral wedge osteotomy was done; the desired position obtained was temporarily stabilized by connecting the pins with the AO external fixator and stabilized with 90 degrees AO distal femur pediatric locking plate and gap grafted with hydroxyapatite bone granules.

Results

Translation of distal fragment was required in 17 osteotomies (53.12%). Osteotomies united within 12 weeks; no non-union was observed. The range of motion was full in all patients. The mean tibiofemoral angle was corrected by 12 degrees and the mean mechanical LDFA was corrected to 87 degrees. There was no secondary deformity, either in the rotational or sagittal plane.

Conclusion

This method combines the modularity of external fixator and the advantages of internal fixation.

Osteotomy wedge angle - Aiming to achieve perfection with new device: Pre-clinical stage

Introduction

The surgical execution of osteotomy requires precision in measuring the wedge angle. The pre-operative planning methods are plenty and so are few devices for high tibial osteotomy. But struggle happens for those bony areas other than proximal tibia where alignment correction is needed. The new device is proposed to address this surgical problem. The ease of measuring angle for bony wedge angle, in any bone, independent of its width and in any plane, is the question being solved with the proposed devices.

Methods

Two jig instruments have been shown in the study. First one the curved with direct angle measuring marking in degrees on the body. K wire is accepted through the tower exactly showing the desired angle. The second jig instrument is flat design with marking in millimeters. This device works on trigonometric principle of sum of angles of any triangle is equal to 180°. The jig can be removed leaving the k wires in place to complete the final osteotomy once confirmed.

Results

It's a pre-clinical stage study. The saw bone models show encouraging measurements and perfect execution of angle at the osteotomy site.

Discussion

HTO has been researched a lot with many options of surgical devices. The criticism of using known devices is the variable accuracy, especially for the smaller width of tibial metaphysis. One major limitation of these available instruments is they can be used only for proximal tibial metaphysis. For any other surgical sites like distal femur, distal tibia, distal humerus or tibial slope correction neither these HTO jigs will work nor there is any available universal instrument as such. The common misconception of one degree equal to 1 mm does not stand true at all bony sites. Hence there was a need to solve this problem with universal jig. I have designed two new devices which are currently at pre-clinical stage. The curve device has limitations which get corrected in straight device. The philosophy changes from one direct measurement with two tips of wires forming the angle in a curved device to indirect measurement by simple trigonometric calculation in a straight device. The proposed new device would work in any bone, for any trapezoidal wedge shape osteotomy using simple user-friendly k wires.

Biomechanical Comparison of Uniplanar versus Biplanar Lateral Opening-wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy Techniques in Terms of Risk for Medial Hinge Fracture

The effect of osteotomy type on the initial stiffness of the bone-implant construct in lateral opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) using a uniplanar compared with a biplanar technique has been investigated. However, no study has explored the biomechanical risk factors for medial hinge fracture. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength of uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO regarding the risk for medial hinge fracture during gap opening. Twelve composite femora were divided into two groups (six in each group) based on the distal femoral osteotomy technique: uniplanar versus biplanar LOWDFO. All LOWDFO models were subjected to incremental static loading. The gap distance was expanded by 1 mm, and displacement values were recorded as anterior and posterior gap distances (mm). The average force values of all samples at certain gap distances were recorded, and the head distance was measured. The uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group at all anterior gap distances. These differences were only significant at 2- and 3-mm gap distances (p = 0.025 and 0.037). At all posterior gap distances, the uniplanar group had higher load values than the biplanar group, but these differences only reached statistical significance at 2 mm (p = 0.037). Both groups had similar anterior, posterior, and average gap distances (p = 0.75, 0.522, 0.873). The uniplanar group had a higher head insertion distance (15.3 ± 5.7) than the biplanar group (14.7 ± 2.9), but it was not significant (p = 0.87). The uniplanar group had a lower average load before medial hinge fracture (46.41 ± 13.91 N) than the biplanar group (54.92 ± 31.94, p = 0.81). The biplanar group had an average maximum load value of 64.18 ± 25.6 N, while the uniplanar group had 57.90 ± 12.21 N (p = 0.81). This study revealed that the biplanar osteotomy technique allows a wider opening wedge gap with less risk of a medial hinge fracture than uniplanar LOWDFO.Level of evidence was level 3, case-control series.

Navigation of femoral and popliteal artery around the knee with CT angiography: implications for surgical interventions

PURPOSE

Uncertainty about the exact position of the femoral and popliteal arteries in the medial thigh and posterior knee might increase vascular complications in surgical procedures. This study aimed to document femoral and popliteal arteries in the medial thigh and around the knee to assist surgeons in developing safer surgical approaches.

METHODS

The study included 120 patients-180 lower limbs-who underwent CT angiography (CTA) of the lower extremity. The distance from the femoral artery to the anterior border, midsagittal axis, and posterior border of the femur and the popliteal artery to the medial, lateral, and midpoint posterior cortex of the proximal tibia was measured in two- and three-dimensional CTA images.

RESULTS

The femoral artery was found to be on average 236.93 ± 29.61 mm, 195.34 ± 26.12 mm, and 146.28 ± 33.18 mm away from the adductor tubercle at the anterior, midsagittal axis, and posterior borders of the femur, correspondingly. The popliteal artery was to be located on average 5.40 ± 2.50 mm posterior to the midpoint of the plateau tibia at the joint line.

CONCLUSION

Considering the mentioned femoral/popliteal artery distances to the femur and proximal tibia would direct surgeons to the safe zones for more accurate surgical approaches in the medial thigh and around the knee when performing osteotomies, knee arthroplasty, arthroscopy, and trauma surgeries, to reduce possible vascular damages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effects of Lateral Opening-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy on Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Background

Lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment increases the rate of lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) with a concomitant varus-producing opening-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an option yet to be evaluated biomechanically.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to clarify the biomechanical effects of the realignment procedure in the setting of LMAT. We hypothesized that (1) given the dependence of the lateral compartment on the lateral meniscus, a DFO and increasing degrees of varus would be insufficient to restore lateral compartment pressures to normal from a lateral meniscus-deficient state, and that (2) LMAT would restore lateral compartment pressures to the intact state while DFO would decrease lateral compartment pressures for any given state of the meniscus.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Ten cadaveric knees underwent opening-wedge varus-producing DFO secured by an external fixator. Anatomic alignment was standardized to 6° of mechanical valgus, and each joint was tested in full extension. Submeniscal placement of thin film pressure sensors allowed for the recording of contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and contact area. The specimens were loaded on a biaxial dynamic testing machine with loading angles between 9° valgus and 6° varus of mechanical alignment. Conditions tested included intact meniscus, meniscal deficiency, and meniscal transplantation.

Results

Isolated varus-producing DFO to 6° in the meniscus-deficient state failed to restore joint pressures and contact areas to the intact state, with significant changes in mean contact pressure (175%), mean peak contact pressure (135%), and contact area (-41%) (all P < .05 vs intact), while LMAT restored all outcome measures (all P > .05 compared with intact). After LMAT, every additional 1° of DFO correction contributed to a decrease in the mean contact pressure, peak pressure, and contact area of 5.6% (-0.0479 N/mm²), 5.9% (-0.154 N/mm²), and 1.4% (-6.99 mm²) for the lateral compartment and 7.3% (+0.034 N/mm²), 12.6% (+0.160 N/mm²), and 4.3% (+20.53 mm²) for the medial compartment, respectively.

Conclusion

Isolated DFO was inadequate to restore load distribution in meniscus-deficient knees, while concomitant LMAT restored near normal forces and improved the lateral compartment biomechanical profile.

Clinical Relevance

Our findings support the concomitant use of LMAT and varus-producing DFO in the setting of lateral meniscal deficiency with valgus malalignment. This study provides tools for the orthopaedic surgeon to individualize the correction for each patient.

Complications after high tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy are associated with increasing medical comorbidities and tobacco use

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess complications, reoperations, and their risk factors at 90 days and 2 years after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) in a national cohort.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Mariner Dataset was queried using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for HTO and DFO, complications, and subsequent surgery. Minimum follow-up was 2 years and complications were assessed at 90 days and 2 years. Hospital readmission in the first 90 days was also assessed. Univariate and multiple logistic regression were utilized to identify risk factors for complications and re-operation.

RESULTS

The 90-day and 2-year complication rates after HTO (n = 1780) were 11.6% and 31.7%, compared to 21.5% (p < 0.0001) and 41.5% (p = 0.0001) after DFO (n = 446). Infection was the most frequent early (90-day) complication for both HTO and DFO cohorts, while hardware problems were most common at 2 years. Increasing Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) was associated with increased odds of infection, readmission, and hardware-associated complications in both cohorts. Gender and tobacco use were also associated with various complications after HTO. At 2 years, 23.7% of HTO patients and 26.2% of DFO patients had undergone subsequent surgery. Hardware removal occurred in 16.4% of HTO and 18.4% of DFO patients (n.s.), while 4.5% of HTO and 5.2% of DFO patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within 2 years (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

HTO and DFO have substantial complication rates in the short and mid term, with a higher rate of overall complications observed after DFO as compared to the HTO cohort. After both procedures, roughly one quarter of patients will undergo subsequent surgery within 2 years. Patients with tobacco use and numerous medical co-morbidities may not be optimal candidates due to increased complication rates. Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) may be an useful tool for risk assessment prior to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, III.

Distal femoral osteotomy versus lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty for isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose

Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients.

Methods

Patients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients.

Results

The DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of −3.26 and −3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3.

Conclusion

UKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement.

Level of evidence: III, comparative retrospective cohort study.

Return to Sport and Work Following Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review

Background: Distal femoral varus osteotomy (DFVO) is an effective surgical intervention for the management of symptomatic valgus malalignment of the knee. Because it preserves the native knee joint and its ligamentous stability, DFVO is preferred to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the young, active population. Purpose: We sought to assess return to work (RTW) and return to sport (RTS) rates following DFVO for valgus malalignment of the knee. Methods: For this systematic review, we searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception through December 31, 2020. English language studies of all levels of evidence explicitly reporting on RTS and RTW rates following DFVO for valgus malalignment of the knee were eligible for inclusion. Results: Seven studies and 127 patients were included in our analysis. Mean age was 32.4 ± 8.8 years with men comprising 46.7% ± 22.3% of study populations. The mean RTS rate was 87.2% ± 10.7%, with a return to preoperative activity levels rate of 65.4% ± 26.8%. The mean RTW rate was 81.8% ± 23.3%, with a return to preoperative activity levels of 72.8% ± 18.1%. The mean reoperation rate was 35.6% ± 18.8% within a mean follow-up period of 5.5 ± 1.9 years. Conclusions: This systematic review of low-level studies found DFVO to be a safe and effective procedure for the management of genu valgum in young, active populations, with most patients returning to sport and/or work, although not all at their preoperative activity levels. A paucity of data surrounds RTS and RTW rates following DFVO. Future studies should explicitly report both return to activity rates and whether patients returned to their preoperative activity levels.

[Research progress of osteotomy around knee in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To review the research progress of surgical methods of osteotomy around the knee in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The relevant literature on the surgical treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed, and the advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of different surgical methods of osteotomy around the knee were summarized.

RESULTS

For young and active patients with symptomatic valgus knee osteoarthritis, osteotomy around the knee is a safe and reliable treatment option. At present, the main surgical methods include medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy, lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy, medial closing wedge high tibial osteotomy, and lateral opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of different osteotomies are different, and the selection of appropriate surgical method is the key to achieve good effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

There are many osteotomies in the treatment of valgus knee osteoarthritis. In order to achieve good results, improve survival rate, and reduce postoperative complications, the most reasonable surgical strategy needs to be developed according to different situations.

Osteotomies for lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis

Lateral compartment osteoarthritis (LCOA) is often associated with valgus deformity of the knee. The concept of correcting the alignment by performing distal femoral varus osteotomy (DFVO) to unload the lateral compartment is well accepted and it is viewed as the preferred option for young active patients due to dissatisfaction from arthroplasty under 55 years of age or if they wish to remain active. Beyond this there is no consensus on patient selection, preoperative assessment, techniques to achieve correction, end point of correction, return to work or sports post-surgery, and survivorship of osteotomy with conversion to a total knee replacement as the end point due to heterogenous, retrospective studies. Here, we review relevant literature to help patient selection, preoperative work up, techniques, and outcomes.

Resident Involvement in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion is Associated With Increased Readmissions and Operative Time, But No Increased Short-term Risks

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare rates of adverse events and additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cases assisted by residents versus cases performed solely by an orthopedic attending.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PLIF is a widely accepted surgical technique for the management of a variety of spinal conditions requiring spinal stabilization and fusion. However, no published studies have assessed the effects of resident involvement on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in PLIF.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry from 2007 to 2012 to identify patients who underwent PLIF procedures. A propensity score matching model was utilized to reduce patient cohort variances. The perioperative data and outcomes in the matched population were analyzed using paired t test and the McNemar test in order to assess, based on resident presence, the rates of postoperative adverse events, readmission, reoperation within 30 days, and operative time.

RESULTS

In total, 1633 patients undergoing PLIF were included in the study, with 24.62% involving resident participation. The propensity score matching algorithm yielded 396 well-matched resident and nonresident pairs. Patients undergoing PLIF involving a resident were associated with a higher rate of readmission (1.77% vs. 0.00%; P=0.008), and longer operative time (245.7 vs. 197.7 min; P<0.001). However, these procedures were not associated with any significant difference in minor or severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement in PLIF was associated with an increased rate of readmissions, and operative time; however, was not associated with an increase in minor or severe adverse events. Further investigation is needed to characterize the role of resident involvement based on level of training experience, as well as methods to improve the learning curve to independence while reducing postoperative hospital length of stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Technique for Biplanar Lateral Opening Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy in the Valgus Knee

Valgus malalignment can be corrected with a biplanar lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (bLOWDFO) in patients with symptomatic lateral compartment disease. Advantages of a lateral opening wedge technique over the medial closing wedge technique include avoidance of vascular structures and theoretically better control of the amount of correction. The advantages of a bLOWDFO over a uniplanar osteotomy are that it creates a larger surface area for healing, and provides inherent stability to control the osteotomy intraoperatively. The purpose of this article is to present a reproducible technique for bLOWDFO and review the indications, preoperative planning, rationale, and clinical outcomes.

Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy: a systematic review and current concepts

INTRODUCTION

Distal Femoral Osteotomy (DFO) is a common procedure for correcting lower limb valgus deformity and lateral compartment overload. Low 20-year survivorship rate was reported with a consequent need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to review literature and to analyse the influence of a previous distal femoral osteotomy on outcomes of patients undergoing TKA.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed/Medline and Embase in May 2020. Papers were selected based on the following criteria: patient with a previous distal femoral osteotomy; total knee replacement; Pre- and Postoperative outcomes; surgical outcomes: clinical scores, range of motion, radiographic evaluation and revisions for any cause; case series, retrospective studies, observational studies, open-label studies, randomized clinical trials; systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included to extract primitive studies.

RESULTS

306 articles were found, of which five papers were considered eligible for this review. In every study included, postoperative clinical outcomes (Knee Society Score or Hospital for Special Surgery score) statistically improved from the preoperative. Complications were not uncommon; implant survivorship at the available follow-up seems to be similar to primary TKA, although being too short to draw any conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited and highly heterogeneous evidence is currently available on the influence of DFO on outcomes after TKA. Knee replacement improves clinical middle-term outcomes in patients with previous distal femoral osteotomy. In this complex surgery, the use of technical tips and tricks could help surgeons to obtain an accurate knee balancing and better long-term results.

Outcome of Dome Osteotomy With Plate Osteosynthesis for Genu Valgum in Late Adolescents and Young Adults

Aim

To evaluate the degree of correction and outcomes after correction of genu valgum deformity using dome osteotomy with plate osteosynthesis in late adolescents and young adults.

Methods

A total of 27 knees in 21 patients underwent correction using dome osteotomy fixed with 3.5-mm low-profile proximal humeral locking system (PHILOS) plate. The functional, clinical, and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. Functional assessment was performed using the Bostman score, while clinical and radiological assessments were performed by measuring intermalleolar distance, tibiofemoral angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, and mechanical axis deviation. All values were compared preoperatively and postoperatively using the paired t-test and Wilcoxon’s test.

Results

The comparison between preoperative and postoperative data was statistically significant (P<0.0001). Twenty patients had an excellent knee score, and one patient had a good score. None had an unsatisfactory score.

Conclusions

Dome osteotomy fixed with well-contoured, 3.5-mm low-profile PHILOS plate allows deformity correction at the CORA (center of rotation of angulation) of the knee and permits early knee mobilization without significant procedure or implant-related complications with excellent outcomes.

Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal femur: minor advantages for a biplanar compared to a uniplanar technique

PURPOSE

Valgus malalignment of the distal femur may be treated with corrective osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability of a lateral opening-wedge osteotomy (LOWO) using a uniplanar compared to a biplanar technique. A study was carried out to test both surgeries, with both an intact medial cortex and with a deliberate attached cut of the medial cortex simulating a fracture. The primary hypothesis was that the biplanar technique provides higher axial and torsional stiffness. It was further hypothesized that the mechanical superiority of the biplanar technique would not be affected in the case of breakage of the far medial cortex.

METHODS

A LOWO was performed in ten synthetic femora (#3406 left large Femur, 4th Generation, Sawbones, Malmö, Sweden) using a lateral angle stable locking plate (NCB© Distal Femur Plate, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, USA). A uniplanar osteotomy was performed in five femora, and a biplanar osteotomy was performed in five femora. The femora were tested for axial and torsional loads using a servo-hydraulic testing machine (Instron 8874, Instron Structural Testing GmbH, High Wycombe, UK).

RESULTS

Axial stiffness decreased significantly (p = 0.001) in both groups (20% in the uniplanar group and 28 % in the biplanar group) by cutting the medial cortex. The type of osteotomy had no significant effect. A slightly lower but not statistically significant axial stiffness was seen in the biplanar group both for intact and broken medial cortices. Internal torsional stiffness dropped by more than 30% for the uniplanar group and almost 24% for the biplanar group when the cortex was cut (p < 0.001). No significant change concerning internal torsional stiffness was found between the two groups. External torsional stiffness decreased by 32% for the uniplanar group and 4% for the biplanar group after the cortical cut (p = 0.029). No significant change concerning external torsional stiffness was found between the groups, but the biplanar group showed a tendency towards higher values of external torsional stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

The axial and torsional stiffness of the implant-bone construct were not significantly affected by the type of osteotomy performed. Biplanar osteotomy tended to increase external torsional stiffness. In cases of fracture of the medial cortex, biplanar osteotomy significantly reduced the external rotation at the osteotomy and showed a significantly increased external torsional stiffness.

Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy

The main indication for performing a distal femoral osteotomy is valgus malalignment of the knee joint. The ideal candidates are young and active individuals with isolated lateral compartment arthritis. The goal of the procedure is to create a neutral mechanical axis of the limb to relieve pain and preserve the knee joint. The amount of correction is calculated from a preoperative, high-quality, weight-bearing radiograph from the hip to ankle. This technically challenging operation is a viable option for patients with valgus malalignment because early survivorship is strong and patient-reported outcome scores are significantly improved.

Lateral Opening Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy for Lateral Compartment Arthrosis/Overload

Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is a valid option for the treatment of young and active patients with lateral compartment osteoarthritis/overload and valgus malalignment. DFOs can be performed with a closing wedge or opening wedge technique. Lateral opening wedge DFO is usually preferred for smaller corrections, whereas medial closing wedge for larger corrections and in patients with high risk of nonunion. This article describes the relevant aspects regarding lateral opening wedge DFO, including patient selection, preoperative planning, surgical technique, results, and complications.

Derotational osteotomy at the distal femur is effective to treat patients with patellar instability

PURPOSE

Increased femoral antetorsion influences patellofemoral joint kinematics. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome after derotational osteotomies and combined procedures in patients with patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

All patients with derotational osteotomies and combined procedures in patients with patellofemoral instability and increased femoral antetorsion performed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria were open growth plates, posttraumatic deformities, and a follow-up period less than 12 months. Simple radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cartilage lesions, trochlear dysplasia, tubercle distance, and osseous malalignment as frontal axis and torsion were performed on every patient. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the subjective IKDC evaluation form, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity score.

RESULTS

Out of 222 femoral osteotomies, a total of 42 patients (44 knees) met the inclusion criteria. Mean preoperative femoral antetorsion of 31° (SD ± 9°) and mean valgus malalignment of 1° (SD ± 3°) were observed. An intended derotation of 12° (SD ± 5°) was set overall. The additional procedures included correction of valgus in 50% (n = 22), MPFL reconstruction in 64% (n = 28), patellofemoral arthroplasty in 18% (n = 8), trochleoplasty in 14% (n = 6), tibial tubercle transfer in 14% (n = 6). During the mean follow-up period of 44 months (SD ± 27, range 12-88), a total of five patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in a follow-up rate of 89% (n = 39). A significant pain relief from VAS 4 (SD ± 3) to VAS 2 (SD ± 2) (p = 0.006) as well as improved scores, WOMAC: from 80 (SD ± 14) to 88 (SD ± 16) (p = 0.007), Lysholm: from 46 (SD ± 21) to 71 (SD ± 24) (p < 0.001), IKDC: from 54 (SD ± 13) to 65 (SD ± 17) (p < 0.001), were observed postoperatively. During the follow-up period, no patellar re-dislocation was observed.

CONCLUSION

Combined derotational osteotomy is a suitable treatment for patellar instability due to torsional malformity, as it leads to a significant reduction of pain, and a significant increase of knee function with good-to- excellent results in the short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Single cut distal femoral osteotomy for correction of femoral torsion and valgus malformity in patellofemoral malalignment - proof of application of new trigonometrical calculations and 3D-printed cutting guides

Background

The purpose of this study was to perform a derotational osteotomy at the distal femur, as is done in cases of patellofemoral instability, and demonstrate the predictability of three-dimensional (3D) changes on axes in a cadaveric model by the use of a new mathematical approach.

Methods

Ten human cadaveric femurs, with increased antetorsion, underwent a visually observed derotational osteotomy at the distal femur by 20°, as is commonly done in clinics. For surgery, a single cut osteotomy with a defined cutting angle was calculated and given using a simple 3D-printed cutting guide per specimen, based on a newly-created trigonometrical model. To simulate post-operative straight frontal alignment in a normal range, a goal for the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA) was set to 87.0° for five specimens (87-goal group) and 90.0° for five specimens (90-goal group). Specimens underwent pre- and post-operative radiographic analysis with CT scan for torsion and frontal plane x-ray for alignment measurements of mLDFA and anatomical mechanical angle (AMA).

Results

Performed derotation showed a mean of 19.69° ±1.08°SD (95% CI: 18.91° to 20.47°). Regarding frontal alignment, a mean mLDFA of 86.9° ±0.66°SD (87-goal-group) and 90.42° ±0.25° SD (90-goal group), was observed (p = 0.008). Overall, the mean difference between intended mLDFA-goal and post-operatively achieved mLDFA was 0.14° ±0.56° SD (95% CI: -0.26° to 0.54°).

Conclusion

A preoperative calculated angle for single cut derotational osteotomy at the distal femur leads to a clinically precise post-operative result on torsion and frontal alignment when using this approach.

Derotational Osteotomy of the Distal Femur for the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability Simultaneously Leads to the Correction of Frontal Alignment: A Laboratory Cadaveric Study

Background:

Derotational osteotomy of the distal femur allows the anatomic treatment of patellofemoral maltracking due to increased femoral antetorsion. However, such rotational osteotomy procedures have a high potential of intended/unintended changes of frontal alignment.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to perform derotational osteotomy of the distal femur and to demonstrate the utility of a novel trigonometric approach to address 3-dimensional (3D) changes on 2-dimensional imaging (axial computed tomography [CT] and frontal-plane radiography). The hypothesis was that 1-step single-cut osteotomy can simultaneously correct torsion and frontal alignment based on preoperatively calculated cutting angles.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Eight human cadaveric whole legs (4 lower limb torsos) underwent derotational osteotomy of the distal femur of 20°. A straight leg axis, determined as a mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) of 0°, was chosen as a goal for postoperative frontal alignment. The inclination of the cutting angle from the lateral view was calculated individually for each cadaveric leg and was represented by a simple 3D-printed cutting guide for surgery. Specimens underwent CT for the measurement of torsion, while the frontal leg axis was determined on an upright radiograph preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative angles were compared with the mathematical prediction model.

Results:

The preoperative mFTA ranged from –3.9° (valgus) to +3.4° (varus) (mean, –0.2° ± 2.6°). A postoperative mean mFTA of 0.37° ± 0.69° (95% CI, –0.22° to 0.95°) was achieved (P = .01). Derotation showed a mean of 19.1° ± 2.1° (95% CI, 17.3°-20.8°). The oblique cutting plane for the correction of valgus legs showed a mean of 5.9° ± 6.8° and, for the correction of varus legs, a mean of –10.0° ± 4.5° projected on the perpendicular plane to the virtual anatomic shaft axis from the sagittal view.

Conclusion:

Single-cut distal femoral osteotomy can be performed to simultaneously address rotational as well as frontal alignment using a preoperatively defined oblique cut, as determined by the presented reproducible calculation model.

Clinical Relevance:

This study adds important knowledge to the technique of derotational osteotomy. This approach provides an individual, oblique single cut for the correction of torsion and frontal axis within a clinically insignificant margin. Simplified tables for calculation and a surgical reference make this model reproducible and safe.

Experience of supracondylar cheveron osteotomy for genu valgum in 115 adolescent knees

PURPOSE

Medial close wedge Coventry type osteotomy is commonly performed procedure for adoloscent Genu valgum. However this osteotomy has some inherent problems, a wedge resection causes shortening of affected site. An additional plate for stabilization causes increase in soft tissue dissection and surgical time. A cheveron osteotomy is an alternative procedure, not requiring any internal fixation due to its inherent stability. We started this study with aim to analyze the results of Cheveron osteotomy, to see if the osteotomy was stable enough without implants, time required for healing of osteotomy, post-operative range of motion, limb length discrepancy and to evaluate any other complication.

METHODS

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of cheveron osteotomy in cases with genu valgum in our department from 2005 to 2012. 75 children with 115 knee deformities were included in the study. Patients were followed upto minimum 3 years post surgery. Clinical and radiological assessment was done on all subsequent visits.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean valgus angle was 21° (12-30°) and mean inter malleolar distance was 12.3 cm(11-21 cm). The mean post-operative angle was 6.5° and mean intermalleolar distance was 5.6 cm. The difference was statistically significant. The mean tourniquet time was 26 min and mean surgical time including plaster cast application was 38 min. Mean blood loss was 75 ml. The mean time to union was 10.3 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Supracondylar cheveron osteotomy is simple, stable, low cost osteotomy for surgical correction of genu valgum. The osteotomy provides excellent clinical, radiological and functional results in short surgical time and has an added advantage of omitting the need of second surgery.