Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Impact on Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity

Clinical Impact of the Volumetric Quantification of Ventricular Secondary Mitral Regurgitation by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The assessment of ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation (v-SMR) severity through effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculations using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the two-dimensional echocardiography volumetric method (2DEVM) is prone to underestimation. Accordingly, we sought to investigate the accuracy of the three-dimensional echocardiography volumetric method (3DEVM) and its association with outcomes in v-SMR patients.

METHODS

We included 229 patients (70 ± 13 years, 74% men) with v-SMR. We compared EROA and RegVol calculated by the 3DEVM, 2DEVM, and PISA methods. The end point was a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death for any cause.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 20 ±11 months, 98 patients (43%) reached the end point. Regurgitant volume and EROA calculated by 3DEVM were larger than those calculated by 2DEVM and PISA. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, both EROA (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P = .008) and RegVol (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82; P = .02) measured by 3DEVM showed the highest association with the outcome at 2 years compared to PISA and 2DEVM (P < .05 for all). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of events in patients with EROA ≥ 0.3 cm2 (cumulative survival at 2 years: 28% ± 7% vs 32% ± 10% vs 30% ± 11%) and RegVol ≥ 45 mL (cumulative survival at 2 years: 21% ± 7% vs 24% ± 13% vs 22% ± 10%) by 3DEVM compared to those by PISA and 2DEVM, respectively. In Cox multivariable analysis, 3DEVM EROA remained independently associated with the end point (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .02). The model including EROA by 3DEVM provided significant incremental value to predict the combined end point compared to those using 2DEVM (net reclassification index = 0.51, P = .003; integrated discrimination index = 0.04, P = .014) and PISA (net reclassification index = 0.80, P < .001; integrated discrimination index = 0.06, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Effective regurgitant orifice area and RegVol calculated by 3DEVM were independently associated with the end point, improving the risk stratification of patients with v-SMR compared to the 2DEVM and PISA methods.

Passive Leg Raise Stress Echocardiography in Severe Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is used to increase the transvalvular flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Dobutamine fails to increase the stroke volume index (SVI) in a third of patients. In this study, we tested whether passive leg raise (PLR) added to dobutamine could increase SVI and transvalvular flow in patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with apparent severe low-flow, low-gradient AS based on traditional measurements were included. Twenty-five were categorized as belonging to the "Paradox"-Group (LVEF≥50%), and twenty to the "LowEF"-Group (LVEF<50% or "classical" low-flow, low-gradient AS) for comparison. A four-step stress echocardiographic exam was performed: resting conditions ("Rest"), PLR alone ("PLR"), maximal dobutamine infusion rate ("Dmax"), and combination of Dmax and PLR ("Dmax+PLR"). AVA, (aortic valve area, cm²) SVI (ml/m2) and mean transvalvular flow (ml/s) were calculated using both, velocity-time-integral (VTI) of LV outflow tract and the Simpson-method. Changes compared to "Rest" and between the stress maneuvers were analysed.

RESULTS

In the "Paradox"-Group, compared to "Rest", LV end-diastolic volume significantly decreased under "Dmax" but was completely restored with "Dmax+PLR" ("Rest", "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR": 61±15 vs 49±18 (p<0.001) vs 61±18 ml (ns)). The smallest SVI-increase in the "Paradox"-Group was observed during "Dmax" ("PLR", "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR": VTI: 38±4 (p<0.001), 36±7 (p=0.019), 41±7 (p<0.001); Simpson: 28±6 (p<0.001), 21±7 (ns), 27±7 ml/m² (ns)). Compared to "Dmax", "Dmax+PLR" was able to achieve a higher SVI (VTI: 36±7 vs 41±7, p<0.001, Simpson: 21±7 vs 27±7 ml/m², p<0.001), and transvalvular flow in the Simpson-method only (179±56 vs 219±56 ml/s, p<0.001) as well as, additionally, a higher mean gradient (34±10 vs 39±12 mmHg, p=0.003) and AVA in the Simpson-method (0.64±0.21 vs 0.73±0.21 cm², p=0.026). In the "LowEF"-Group, only SVI VTI (31±8 vs 35±7 ml/m², p=0.034) and mean gradient (29±12 vs 34±14 mmHg, p=0.003) were higher in "Dmax+PLR". The proportion of patients with SVI VTI ≥ 35 ml/m² and an increase of SVI VTI of more than 20% compared to "Rest" was highest in "Dmax+PLR" in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine decreases the preload in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Adding PLR counteracts this effect, resulting in increased SVI and flow (in one method). The combined stress maneuver allowed reclassification of some patients from severe to moderate AS and may therefore be useful in selected cases in this population where the severity is uncertain.

Diversity and determinants of the sigmoid septum and its impact on morphology of the outflow tract as revealed using cardiac computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The sigmoid septum has been generally evaluated subjectively and qualitatively, without detailed examination of its diversity, impact on the morphology of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), and anatomical background.

METHODS

We enrolled 100 patients without any background cardiac diseases (67.5 ± 12.8 years old; 43% women) who underwent cardiac computed tomography. Basal septal morphology was evaluated using antero-superior and medial bulging angles (bidirectional angulation of the basal septum relative to the LVOT). The eccentricity index of the LVOT, area narrowing ratio (LVOT/virtual basal ring area), aortic-to-left ventricular axial angle (angulation of the aortic root relative to the left ventricle), and wedged height (non-coronary aortic sinus to inferior epicardium distance) were also quantified.

RESULTS

The antero-superior bulging, medial bulging, aortic-to-left ventricular axial angles, LVOT eccentricity index, area narrowing ratio, and wedged height were 76° ± 17°, 166° ± 27°, 127° ± 9°, 1.8 ± 0.5, 1.0 ± 0.2, and 41.2 ± 9.1 mm, respectively. Both bulging angles were correlated with each other and contributed to the narrowing and deformation of the LVOT. Angulated aortic root was not correlated with either bidirectional septal bulge or LVOT narrowing. Clockwise rotation of the aortic root rotation was an independent predictor of prominent antero-superior septal bulge. Deeper aortic wedging was a common independent predictor of bidirectional septal bulge.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of septal bulge varies in normal hearts. Along with deep aortic wedging, the bidirectional bulge of the basal septum deforms and narrows the LVOT without affecting the virtual basal ring morphology.

Predictive value of elliptical neck parameters and oversizing ratio for type Ia endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive value of elliptical geometric parameters regarding type IA endoleak (T1AEL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and investigate optimal range of oversizing ratio (OSR) in patients with elliptical aneurysmal neck.

METHODS

In this propensity-score matched case-control study, case patients were those diagnosed with T1AEL, control patients were those who did not have T1AEL after EVAR in the same period from 2012 to 2018. Geometric and oversizing parameters were compared based on both 2D and 3D measurement. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) was used to measure prediction increment of elliptical model (major axis OSR, neck length and severe neck angulation (SNA)) compared to conventional model (OSR 2D, neck length and SNA).

RESULTS

Nineteen case patients and 111 control patients were included. The median OSR 2D of T1AEL patients were 17% (15%-22%), but the median major axis OSR were only 7% (5%-12%). Among geometric parameters, axis difference had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95%CI 0.63-0.84) in predicting T1AEL. As for elliptical oversizing parameters, major axis OSR had an AUC of 0.89 (95%CI 0.78-0.97) with a cut-off value of 13%. Elliptical model had higher discriminating ability in T1AEL compared to conventional model (AUC 0.91 vs 0.86, P=0.045), with improved reclassification ability (NRI 27.93%, 95% CI 19.22%-36.64%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Elliptical aneurysmal neck, assessed by axis difference, is associated with an increased risk of T1AEL. Calculation of oversizing based on major axis for at least 13% can significantly reduce the risk of T1AEL in patients with elliptical aneurysmal neck.

Assessment of the left ventricular outflow tract during cardiac anaesthesia with biplane transoesophageal echocardiography: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area is a key component of quantification of aortic stenosis and stroke volume. Current international guidelines recommend measurement of the LVOT diameter with two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and assume a circle. This may lead to erroneous measures of aortic valve area and adversely affect peri-operative decision making. Multiplane orthogonal (biplane) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography imaging may allow more accurate calculation of LVOT, aortic valve area and stroke volume.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the shape and area of the LVOT with conventional 2D diameter, short axis cross-sectional planimetry with biplane imaging and 3D multiplane reconstruction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE).

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A single centre university hospital.

PATIENTS

119 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with TOE.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measurements of the shape and area of the LVOT with standard 2D TOE, short axis biplane imaging and 3D TOE.

RESULTS

The LVOT shape is elliptical in 70% of patients. The (mean ± SD, [range]) LVOT cross-sectional area with 2D TOE was 4.29 cm2 ± 0.98, [2.46 to 6.70], with biplane was 4.68 cm2 ± 1.03, [2.92 to 7.30] and with 3D was 4.59 cm2 ± 0.99, [2.78 to 7.10]. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in the three pairwise comparisons. 2D LVOT area had large bias (7 to 9%) and wider limits of agreement (LOA) with both biplane and 3D LVOT area (-17 to 36%). Biplane and 3D LVOT areas had small bias (1.8%) with relatively narrow LOA (-8 to 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

2D diameter measures of the LVOT assuming a circle underestimate LVOT area, underestimate aortic valve area and increase the apparent severity of aortic stenosis. This may lead to inappropriate aortic valve intervention. In a busy operating room environment, we suggest that for the calculation of stroke volume and aortic valve area, LVOT area is measured with biplane imaging.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Observational study with no interventions so trial not registered.

Application of the proximal isovelocity surface area method for estimation of the effective orifice area in aortic stenosis

Although the echocardiographic effective orifice area (EOA) calculated using the continuity equation is widely used for the assessment of severity in aortic stenosis (AS), the existence of high flow velocity at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) potentially causes its overestimation. The proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method could be an alternative tool for the estimation of EOA that limits the influence of upstream flow velocity. EOA was calculated using the continuity equation (EOA_Cont) and PISA method (EOA_PISA), respectively, in 114 patients with at least moderate AS. The geometric orifice area (GOA) was also measured using the planimetry method in 51 patients who also underwent three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median LVOT flow velocity. EOA_PISA could be obtained in 108 of the 114 patients (95%). Although there was a strong correlation between EOA_Cont and EOA_PISA (r = 0.78, P < 0.001), EOA_Cont was statistically significantly larger than EOA_PISA (0.86 ± 0.33 vs 0.75 ± 0.29 cm², P < 0.001). Both EOA_Cont and EOA_PISA similarly correlated with GOA (r = 0.70, P < 0.001 and r = 0.77, P < 0.001, respectively). However, a fixed bias, which is hydrodynamically supposed to exist between EOA and GOA, was not observed between EOA_Cont and GOA. In contrast, there was a negative fixed bias between EOA_PISA and GOA with smaller EOA_PISA than GOA. The difference between EOA_Cont and GOA was significantly greater with a larger EOA_Cont relative to GOA in patients with high LVOT flow velocity than in those without (0.16 ± 0.25 vs - 0.07 ± 0.10 cm², P < 0.001). In contrast, the difference between EOA_PISA and GOA was consistent regardless of the LVOT flow velocity (- 0.07 ± 0.12 vs - 0.07 ± 0.15 cm², P = 0.936). The PISA method was applied to estimate EOA in patients with AS. EOA_PISA could be an alternative parameter for AS severity grading in patients with high LVOT flow velocity in whom EOA_Cont would potentially overestimate the orifice area.

Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease of the valve and the myocardium. A correct assessment of the valve disease severity is key to define the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), but a better understanding of the myocardial consequences of the increased afterload is paramount to optimize the timing of the intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of AS assessment, as it is universally available, and it allows a comprehensive structural and hemodynamic evaluation of both the aortic valve and the rest of the heart. However, it may not be sufficient as a significant proportion of patients with severe AS presents with discordant grading (i.e., an AVA ≤ 1 cm² and a mean gradient <40 mmHg) which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS and the need for AVR. Several imaging modalities (transesophageal or stress echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography) exist that allow a detailed assessment of the stenotic aortic valve and the myocardial remodeling response. This review aims to provide an updated overview of these multimodality imaging techniques and seeks to highlight a practical approach to help clinical decision making in the challenging group of patients with discordant low-gradient AS.

The Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Changes in Size and Shape From Pre- to Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

To compare two-dimensional (2D) and 3D imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and to evaluate geometric changes pre- to post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

Retrospective review of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic examinations.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 69 cardiac surgical patients-27 with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and 42 without AS.

INTERVENTIONS

Two-dimensional and 3D analysis of the LVOT pre- and post-CPB.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pre- and post-CPB 2D assessment of LVOT diameter (2D LVOTd) was compared with 3D analysis of the minor (3D LVOTd-min) and major diameters. LVOT areas (LVOTa) were calculated using LVOTd to yield 2D LVOTa and 3D LVOTa-min. These were compared with LVOTa measured by planimetry (3D LVOTa-plan). An ellipticity ratio (ER) (ER = 3D minor/major axes) was calculated. The 2D LVOTd was larger than the 3D LVOTd-min before (2.12 v 2.02 cm respectively (resp); p < 0.001) and after (1.96 v 1.85 cm resp; p = 0.04) CPB. Compared with pre-CPB, there were significant decreases in the 2D LVOTd (p = 0.003) and the 3D LVOTd-min (p < 0.001) post-CPB. Ellipticity increased after CPB (ER 0.80 v 0.75; p = 0.004), and the 2D LVOTa was larger than the 3D LVOTa-min before CPB (3.60 cm²v 3.28 cm²; p < 0.001) and less so after CPB (3.11 cm²v 2.79 cm²; p = 0.053). Compared with pre-CPB, all LVOTa measurements decreased significantly after CPB (p < 0.001). The 3D LVOTa-plan decreased after CPB by approximately 10% (4.05 cm²v 3.61 cm²; p < 0.001). The 2D LVOTa and 3D LVOTa-min underestimated the 3D LVOTa-plan before and after CPB (p < 0.001) by 11% to 14% and 19% to 23%, respectively. When compared with non-AS patients, patients with AS had a smaller LVOTa pre- and post-CPB (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The LVOT is smaller and more elliptical after CPB. Patients with AS have a smaller LVOT compared with non-AS patients. LVOTa calculated using LVOTd underestimates the 3D LVOTa-plan by as much as 23% depending on patient type and timing of measurement. Accurate assessment of the LVOT requires 3D imaging.

Aortic valve area calculation using 3D transesophageal echocardiography: Implications for aortic stenosis severity grading

AIMS

Aortic stenosis (AS) grading by 2D-transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) aortic valve area (AVA) calculation is limited by left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area underestimation. The combination of Doppler parameters with 3D LVOT area obtained by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can improve AS grading, reconciling discordant 2D-TTE findings. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the role of 3D-transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) in AS grading using MDCT as reference standard.

METHODS AND RESULTS

288 patients (81 ± 6.3 years, 52.4% female) with symptomatic AS underwent 2D-TTE, 3D-TEE, and MDCT for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Doppler parameters were combined with 3D LVOT areas measured by manual and semi-automated software 3D-TEE and by MDCT to calculate AVA, reassessing AS severity. Both 3D-TEE modalities demonstrated good correlation with MDCT, with excellent intra-observer and inter-observer variability. Compared to MDCT, 3D-TEE measurements significantly underestimated AVA (P_ANOVA  < .0001), although the difference was clinically acceptable. Compared to 2D-TTE, 3D-TEE manual and semi-automated software reclassified severe AS in 21.9% and 25.2% of cases, respectively (P < .0001), overcame grading parameters discordance in more than 40% of cases in patients with low-gradient AS (P < .0001) and reduced the proportion of low-flow states in nearly 75% of cases when combined to stroke volume index assessment (P < .0001). 3D-TEE imaging modalities showed a reduction in the proportion of patients with low-gradient and pathological AVA as defined by 2D-TTE, and improved AVA and mean pressure gradient agreement with current guidelines cutoff values.

CONCLUSION

3D-TEE AVA calculation is a reliable tool for AS grading with excellent reproducibility and good correlation with MDCT measurements.

Estimation of Stroke Volume and Aortic Valve Area in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Echocardiography versus Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

BACKGROUND

In aortic stenosis, accurate measurement of left ventricular stroke volume (SV) is essential for the calculation of aortic valve area (AVA) and the assessment of flow status. Current American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines suggest that measurements of left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) at different levels (at the annulus vs 5 or 10 mm below) yield similar measures of SV and AVA. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the location of LVOTd measurement on the accuracy of SV and AVA measured on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) compared with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS

One hundred six patients with aortic stenosis underwent both TTE and CMR. SV was estimated on TTE using the continuity equation with LVOTd measurements at four locations: at the annulus and 2, 5, and 10 mm below annulus. SV was also determined on CMR using phase contrast acquired in the aorta (SV_CMR-PC), and a hybrid AVA_CMR-PC was calculated by dividing SV_CMR-PC by the transthoracic echocardiographic Doppler aortic velocity-time integral. Comparison between methods was made using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with the referent method of phase-contrast CMR for the estimation of SV_CMR-PC and AVA_CMR-PC (SV_CMR-PC 83 ± 16 mL, AVA_CMR-PC 1.27 ± 0.35 cm²), the best agreement was obtained by measuring LVOTd at the annulus or 2 mm below (P = NS), whereas measuring 5 and 10 mm below the annulus resulted in significant underestimation of SV and AVA by up to 15.9 ± 17.3 mL and 0.24 ± 0.28 cm², respectively (P < .01 for all). Accuracy for classification of low flow was best at the annulus (86%) and 2 mm below (82%), whereas measuring 5 and 10 mm below the annulus significantly underperformed (69% and 61%, respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring LVOTd at the annulus or very close to it provides the most accurate measures of SV and AVA, whereas measuring LVOTd 5 or 10 mm below significantly underestimates these parameters and leads to significant overestimation of the severity of aortic stenosis and prevalence of low-flow status.

The Year in Perioperative Echocardiography: Selected Highlights From 2019

This article is the fourth of an annual series reviewing the research highlights of the year pertaining to the subspecialty of perioperative echocardiography for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief, Dr. Kaplan, and the editorial board, for the opportunity to continue this series. In most cases, these were research articles that were targeted at the perioperative echocardiography diagnosis and treatment of patients after cardiothoracic surgery; but in some cases, these articles targetted the use of perioperative echocardiography in general.

Impact of anatomical variations of the left ventricular outflow tract on stroke volume calculation by Doppler echocardiography in aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Accurate calculation of stroke volume (SV) by Doppler echocardiography is important for the assessment of aortic stenosis (AS), which may be impacted by anatomical variations of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT).

METHODS

Patients with AS (n = 64) were studied using computed tomography (CT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Anatomical variations of LVOT areas were measured at (a) the aortic annulus (A_a ); (b) 5 mm (A₅ ); and (c) 10 mm below the annulus (A₁₀ ) by CT. LVOT diameters were also measured by 2D TTE at these three levels for calculation of LVOT areas. Stroke volumes (SV) were calculated using continuity equation. The impacts of anatomical variations of LVOT on SV calculation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Anatomical LVOT area increased from A_a to A₁₀ (5.0 ± 0.9 cm² vs 5.8 ± 1.9 cm² , P < .01). Differences between TTE-calculated LVOT areas and anatomical areas were most significant at A₁₀ due to elongation of mediolateral diameters with variable changes in anteroposterior diameters (5.8 ± 1.9 cm² vs 3.4 ± 1.1 cm² , P < .001). Although mean calculated SV by TTE was not significant at different LVOT levels (A_a 69 ± 22 mL, vs A₅ 66 ± 21 mL, vs A₁₀ 66 ± 28 ± 22 mL, P > .05), the most significant variations in individuals were at A₁₀ levels (ΔSV: 8.2 ± 6.4 mL, 12 ± 9%).

CONCLUSION

Variations of LVOT anatomy in individuals with AS significantly impact the SV calculated by Doppler echocardiography. These features should be taken into account for AS diagnosis and a clinical decision-making for intervention.

Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) requires calculation of aortic valve area (AVA), which relies on the assumption of a circular-shaped left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). However, the LVOT is often elliptical, and the circular assumption underestimates the true LVOT area (LVOTA). Biplane imaging using transthoracic echocardiography allows direct planimetry of LVOTA. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining LVOTA using this technique and its impact on the discordance between AVA and gradient criteria in AS grading.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 134 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 73-87 years; 39% women) with AS, including 82 (61%) with severe AS and 52 (39%) with mild or moderate AS. LVOTA was traced using direct planimetry (LVOTA_biplane) and compared with LVOTA calculated using the circular assumption (LVOTA_circ). In a subset of patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, direct planimetry of LVOTA was used as a reference standard.

RESULTS

LVOTA_biplane was significantly larger than LVOTA_circ (4.20 cm² [interquartile range, 3.66-4.90 cm²] vs 3.73 cm² [interquartile range, 3.14-4.15 cm²], P < .001). Among 30 patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, LVOTA_biplane had better agreement with LVOTA by direct planimetry than LVOTA_circ (mean bias, -0.45 ± 0.63 vs -1.02 ± 0.63 cm²; P < .0001). Of 82 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤ 1 cm² using LVOTA_circ), 40 (49%) had discordant mean gradient (<40 mm Hg). By using LVOTA_biplane, patients with discordant AVA and mean gradient decreased from 49% to 27% (P = .004), and 29% of patients with severe AS were reclassified with moderate AS, with the highest percentage of reclassification in the group with low-gradient AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct planimetry using biplane imaging avoids the inherent underestimation of LVOTA using the circular assumption. LVOTA obtained by biplane planimetry can lead to better concordance between AVA and mean gradient and classification of AS severity.

Measurement errors in serial echocardiographic assessments of aortic valve stenosis severity

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) is routinely performed using the continuity equation. Inaccurate measurements of the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) diameter are considered the most common source of error in AS grading. We hypothesized that inconsistency in LVOT velocity time integral (VTI) is an under-recognized cause of AS assessment error. We sought to determine which parameters contribute most towards inconsistencies in AS grading by studying the prevalence of different errors in a historic cohort. We identified patients with mild to severe AS with multiple studies from our database from 1994 to 2018 (n = 988 patients, 2859 studies). Errors were defined when: (1) LVOT diameter changed by > 2 mm, (2) LVOT VTI changed by > 15% without change in LV function from the initial TTE, (3) aortic valve (AV) maximum velocity (Vmax), mean pressure gradient (ΔP) or AV VTI decreased by > 15% without change in LV function from prior study. The most common error was the LVOT VTI measurement with 22% prevalence. LVOT diameter, AV VTI, AV Vmax and AV ΔP measurement caused errors in < 7% studies. Patients with normal LV function and more severe AS were more likely to have LVOT VTI errors (P < 0.05). LVOT VTI is a frequent, under-recognized source of error in assessing AS. Greater attention should be directed toward the proper positioning of the pulsed Doppler sample volume, particularly in patients with higher grades of AS and normal systolic function, to ensure accurate and reproducible assessment of AS.

3-Dimensional Echocardiography: Latest Developments and Future Directions

The ongoing refinements in 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography technology continue to expand the scope of this imaging modality in clinical cardiology by offering new features that stem from the ability to image the heart in its complete dimensionality. Over the years, countless publications have described these benefits and tested new frontiers where 3D echocardiographic imaging seemed to offer promising ways to improve patients' care. These include improved techniques for chamber quantification and novel ways to visualize cardiac valves, including 3D printing, virtual reality, and holography. The aims of this review article are to focus on the most important developments in the field in the recent years, discuss the current utility of 3D echocardiography, and highlight several interesting future directions.

Impact of left ventricular outflow tract flow acceleration on aortic valve area calculation in patients with aortic stenosis

Objective

Due to its circular shape, the area of the proximal left ventricular tract (PLVOT) adjacent to aortic valve can be derived from a single linear diameter. This is also the location of flow acceleration (FA) during systole, and pulse wave Doppler (PWD) sample volume in the PLVOT can lead to overestimation of velocity (V₁) and the aortic valve area (AVA). Therefore, it is recommended to derive V₁ from a region of laminar flow in the elliptical shaped distal LVOT (away from the annulus). Besides being inconsistent with the assumptions of continuity equation (CE), spatial difference in the location of flow and area measurement can result in inaccurate AVA calculation. We evaluated the impact of FA in the PLVOT on the accuracy of AVA by continuity equation (CE) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

CE-based AVA calculations were performed in patients with AS once with PWD-derived velocity time integral (VTI) in the distal LVOT (VTI_LVOT) and then in the PLVOT to obtain a FA velocity profile (FA-VTI_LVOT) for each patient. A paired sample t-test (P < 0.05) was conducted to compare the impact of FA-VTI_LVOT and VTI_LVOT on the calculation of AVA.

Result

There were 46 patients in the study. There was a 30.3% increase in the peak FA-VTI_LVOT as compared to the peak VTI_LVOT and AVA obtained by FA-VTI_LVOT was 29.1% higher than obtained by VTI_LVOT.

Conclusion

Accuracy of AVA can be significantly impacted by FA in the PLVOT. LVOT area should be measured with 3D imaging in the distal LVOT.

Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Stenosis

Degenerative or fibrocalcific aortic stenosis (AS) is now the most common native valvular heart disease assessed and managed by cardiologists in developed countries. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the quintessential imaging modality for the non-invasive characterisation of AS due to its widespread availability, superior assessment of flow haemodynamics, and a wealth of prognostic data accumulated over decades of clinical utility and research applications. With expanding technologies and increasing availability of treatment options such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements, in addition to conventional surgical approaches, accurate and precise assessment of AS severity is critical to guide decisions for and timing of interventions. Despite clear guideline echocardiographic parameters demarcating severe AS, discrepancies between transvalvular velocities, gradients, and calculated valve areas are commonly encountered in clinical practice. This often results in diagnostically challenging cases with significant implications. Greater emphasis must be placed on the quality of performance of basic two dimensional (2D) and Doppler measurements (attention to detail ensuring accuracy and precision), incorporating ancillary haemodynamic surrogates, understanding study- or patient-specific confounders, and recognising the role and limitations of stress echocardiography in the subgroups of low-flow low-gradient AS. A multiparametric approach, along with the incorporation of multimodality imaging (cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) in certain scenarios, is now mandatory to avoid incorrect misclassification of severe AS. This is essential to ensure appropriate selection of patients who would most benefit from interventions on the aortic valve to relieve the afterload mismatch resulting from truly severe valvular stenosis.

Valve area and the risk of overestimating aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To obtain reference values of aortic valve area (AVA) in a large population and to infer the risk of overestimating aortic stenosis (AS) when focusing on flow-corrected indices of severity.

METHODS

We prospectively measured indices of AS in all consecutive echocardiograms performed in a large referral cardiac imaging laboratory for 1 year. We specifically analysed the distribution of AVA, indexed AVA and velocity ratio (Vratio) in patients with and without AS, the latter defined as the coexistence of valvular outflow obstruction (Vmax ≥2.5 m/s) and morphological findings of valve degeneration.

RESULTS

16 156 echocardiograms were analysed, 14 669 of which did not show valvular obstruction (peak jet velocity <2.5 m/s). In the latter group, AVA was 2.6±0.7 cm² in 8190 studies with normal valves and 2.3±0.7 cm² in 6479 studies with aortic sclerosis (AScl). There was a relatively wide overlap between values of AVA, indexed AVA and velocity ratio between studies of patients with AScl and AS. Values of AVA ≤1.0 cm² were found in 0.5% of studies with normal valves and 1.8% of studies with AScl. These proportions were 3.1% and 9.3% for AVA ≤1.5 cm², respectively. Vratio ≤0.25 were found in 0.1% of patients without obstruction. Risk factors for a small AVA in patients without obstruction were AScl, female sex, small body surface area, low ejection fraction and mitral regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal values of continuity-equation derived AVA are smaller than previously considered. AVA values below cutoffs of moderate or severe AS can be found in patients without the disease. Flow-corrected indices may overestimate AS in patients with low gradients, particularly in the presence of well-identified risk factors.

Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images

The assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology is paramount for planning transcatheter AV implantation (TAVI). Nowadays, pre-TAVI sizing is routinely performed at one cardiac phase only, usually at mid-systole. Nonetheless, the AV is a dynamic structure that undergoes changes in size and shape throughout the cardiac cycle, which may be relevant for prosthesis selection. Thus, the aim of this study was to present and evaluate a novel software tool enabling the automatic sizing of the AV dynamically in three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images. Forty-two patients who underwent preoperative 3D-TEE images were retrospectively analyzed using the software. Dynamic measurements were automatically extracted at four levels, including the aortic annulus. These measures were used to assess the software's ability to accurately and reproducibly quantify the conformational changes of the aortic root and were validated against automated sizing measurements independently extracted at distinct time points. The software extracted physiological dynamic measurements in less than 2 min, that were shown to be accurate (error 2.2 ± 26.3 mm² and 0.0 ± 2.53 mm for annular area and perimeter, respectively) and highly reproducible (0.85 ± 6.18 and 0.65 ± 7.90 mm² of intra- and interobserver variability, respectively, in annular area). Using the maximum or minimum measured values rather than mid-systolic ones for device sizing resulted in a potential change of recommended size in 7% and 60% of the cases, respectively. The presented software tool allows a fast, automatic and reproducible dynamic assessment of the AV morphology from 3D-TEE images, with the extracted measures influencing the device selection depending on the cardiac moment used to perform its sizing. This novel tool may thus ease and potentially increase the observer's confidence during prosthesis' size selection at the preoperative TAVI planning.

Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients with heart valve disease can be complex. Patients may have symptoms disproportionate to the severity or the severity may be unclear. In addition, the optimal timing of intervention in patients with severe disease may be controversial. Areas covered: This article examines the role of stress echocardiography for assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, asymptomatic severe valve disease and patients where symptoms are discordant to the resting severity of valve disease. Expert commentary: Stress echocardiography helps clinicians determine the true severity of valve disease and may identify the cause of symptoms in patients with only mild/moderate disease. The data provided by stress echocardiography will help determine the appropriate management strategy and the correct timing of intervention.

3D and 4D Ultrasound: Current Progress and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (3DE) and 4-dimensional echocardiography (4DE), also known as real-time (RT) 3DE (RT3DE), are rapidly emerging technologies which have made significant impact in the clinical arena over the years. This review will discuss the recent applications of 3DE in diagnosing and treating different types of cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies using 3DE expanded on prior findings and introduced additional applications to different cardiac conditions. Some studies have used 3D parameters to prognosticate long-term outcomes. Numerous innovative software designs including fully automated algorithms have been introduced to better evaluate valvular heart disease and cardiac function.

SUMMARY

With further evolution of 3DE technologies, this imaging modality will emerge as a powerful tool and likely become the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis and management of various cardiac disorders.

Intraoperative Transesophageal and Postoperative Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation of a Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis Implanted at Aortic Position

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic (iTEE) characteristics and Doppler flow profile of aortic Chitra heart valve prosthesis (CHVP) under stable hemodynamic and loading conditions, and to compare and correlate the iTEE data with the postoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data obtained at 48 hours (TTE₁) and 3 months (TTE₂) after the surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University-level tertiary referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty patients between 18 years and 65 years of age undergoing elective aortic valve replacement (AVR) using CHVP during the period January 2015 to August 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

After obtaining permission from institutional ethics committee, 40 patients undergoing elective AVR were studied prospectively. The iTEE examination was performed in the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and post-CPB period in all the study subjects. CHVP was subjected to iTEE two-dimensional (2D) echo, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler evaluation under stable hemodynamic and loading condition in the post-CPB period after the administration of protamine. The CHVP were re-evaluated using TTE in all the patients 48 hours after the surgery (TTE₁) and 3 months after the surgery (TTE₂). The iTEE and postoperative TTE Doppler values were compared and correlated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The CHVP could be imaged adequately and interrogated with Doppler in all the patients. None of the patients had restriction of occluder mobility or unstable seating of the valve. The intraoperative flow dependent (peak velocity [PV] and mean pressure gradient [MPG]) and less flow dependent (Doppler velocity index, acceleration time, acceleration time/ejection time, effective orifice area [EOA] and indexed EOA) Doppler parameters of CHVP were measured as per the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations. The PV and MPG of CHVP measured by iTEE showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05) and were in limits of agreement when compared with TTE₁ and TTE₂ data.

CONCLUSION

The iTEE features of CHVP were found compliant with the criteria set by the ASE defining normal functioning of an aortic valve prosthesis. The iTEE Doppler parameters obtained under stable loading conditions strongly predicted the postoperative values of Doppler parameters on TTE examination. The iTEE Doppler values can be used as the reference values for the postoperative follow up studies.