Evaluation of the Integrative Algorithm for Grading Chronic Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Current American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations: To Discriminate Severe from Moderate Regurgitation

The role of E-wave velocity in predicting early left ventricular dysfunction and significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction after mitral valve repair for severe chronic primary mitral regurgitation

Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD) are established predictors of LV dysfunction (LVD) after mitral valve repair (MVr) for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although elevated estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) indicating pulmonary hypertension is the best proposed additional predictor, we hypothesized that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters more directly reflecting left atrial pressure (LAP) would more accurately predict LVD than eRVSP. Furthermore, predictors of a significant decline in LVEF remain unknown. We retrospectively studied 622 patients, aged 20-87 years, who underwent MVr for severe chronic primary MR. As previously reported predictors of postoperative LVD, we collected seven preoperative TTE parameters, including LVESD, LVEF, eRVSP, LV end-diastolic dimension, left atrial volume index (LAVI), early transmitral annular (e') velocity, and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, as LAP-related TTE parameters, we collected left atrial dimension, E-wave velocity, and E/e' ratio, in addition to eRVSP and LAVI. Using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we explored predictors of early postoperative LVD, defined as LVEF < 50% measured on postoperative day 7. We further explored predictors of a significant decline in LVEF, defined as an absolute decline in LVEF of > 12 percentage points, the third quintile of the data. Incidences of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline were 12.9% and 23.2%, respectively. In addition to LVESD and LVEF, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained a significant predictor of postoperative LVD. E-wave velocity, LVESD, and LVEF had additive effects in risk prediction. Furthermore, E-wave velocity was the strongest predictor of a significant LVEF decline. E-wave velocities > 121.5 cm/s and > 101.5 cm/s were associated with increased risks of postoperative LVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.896; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.792-4.681; p < 0.001) and a significant LVEF decline (OR, 6.345; 95%CI, 3.707-10.86; p < 0.001), respectively. After adjustment for multiple TTE parameters, E-wave velocity, but not eRVSP, remained significant predictors of postoperative LVD and a significant LVEF decline after MVr. These results were reproducible in 461 patients who underwent follow-up TTE at 1 year, suggesting an important role of E-wave velocity in risk prediction.

Flow quantification within the aortic ejection tract using 4D flow cardiac MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: Implications for the assessment of aortic regurgitation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac MRI in quantifying aortic flow in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with BAV who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 4D flow cardiac MRI were prospectively included. Aortic flow was quantified using two-dimensional phase contrast velocimetry at the sinotubular junction and in the ascending aorta and using 4D flow in the regurgitant jet, in the left ventricular outflow tract, at the aortic annulus, the sinotubular junction, and the ascending aorta, with or without anatomical tracking. Flow quantification was compared with ventricular volumes, pulmonary flow using Pearson correlation test, bias and limits of agreement (LOA) using Bland Altman method, and with multiparametric transthoracic echocardiography quantification using weighted kappa test.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients (63 men, 25 women) with a mean age of 50.5 ± 14.8 (standard deviation) years (age range: 20.8-78.3) were included. Changes in flow with or without tracking were modest (< 5 mL). The best correlation was obtained at the aortic annulus for forward volume (r = 0.84; LOA [-28.4; 25.3] mL) and at the regurgitant jet and sinotubular junction for regurgitant volume (r = 0.68; LOA [-27.8; 33.8] and r = 0.69; LOA [-28.6; 24.2] mL). A combined approach for regurgitant fraction and net volume calculations using forward volume measured at ANN and regurgitant volume at sinotubular junction performed better than each level taken separately (r = 0.90; LOA [-20.7; 10.0] mL and r = 0.48, LOA [-33.8; 33.4] %). The agreement between transthoracic echocardiography and 4D flow cardiac MRI for aortic regurgitation grading was poor (kappa, 0.13 to 0.42).

CONCLUSION

In patients with BAV, aortic flow quantification by 4D flow cardiac MRI is the most accurate at the annulus for the forward volume, and at the sinotubular junction or directly in the jet for the regurgitant volume.

Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.

Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal

The accurate quantification of primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and its consequences on cardiac remodeling is of paramount importance to determine the best timing for surgery in these patients. The recommended echocardiographic grading of primary MR severity relies on an integrated multiparametric approach. It is expected that the large number of echocardiographic parameters collected would offer the possibility to check the measured values regarding their congruence in order to conclude reliably on MR severity. However, the use of multiple parameters to grade MR can result in potential discrepancies between one or more of them. Importantly, many factors beyond MR severity impact the values obtained for these parameters including technical settings, anatomic and hemodynamic considerations, patient's characteristics and echocardiographer' skills. Hence, clinicians involved in valvular diseases should be well aware of the respective strengths and pitfalls of each of MR grading methods by echocardiography. Recent literature highlighted the need for a reappraisal of the severity of primary MR from a hemodynamic perspective. The estimation of MR regurgitation fraction by indirect quantitative methods, whenever possible, should be central when grading the severity of these patients. The assessment of the MR effective regurgitant orifice area by the proximal flow convergence method should be used in a semi-quantitative manner. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge specific clinical situations in MR at risk of misevaluation when grading severity such as late-systolic MR, bi-leaflet prolapse with multiple jets or extensive leak, wall-constrained eccentric jet or in older patients with complex MR mechanism. Finally, it is debatable whether the 4-grades classification of MR severity would be still relevant nowadays, since the indication for mitral valve (MV) surgery is discussed in clinical practice for patients with 3+ and 4+ primary MR based on symptoms, specific markers of adverse outcome and MV repair probability. Primary MR grading should be seen as a continuum integrating both quantification of MR and its consequences, even for patients with presumed "moderate" MR.

The usefulness of left ventricular volume and aortic diastolic flow reversal for grading chronic aortic regurgitation severity - Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference

Echocardiographic evaluation of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) severity can lead to diagnostic ambiguity due to few feasible parameters or incongruent findings. The aim of the present study was to improve the diagnostic usefulness of left ventricular (LV) enlargement and aortic end-diastolic flow velocity (EDFV) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) as reference. Patients (n = 120) were recruited either prospectively (n = 45) or retrospectively (n = 75). Severe AR (CMR regurgitant fraction > 33%) was present in 51% and 93% of the patients had LV ejection fraction ≥ 50%. EDFV and LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) were assessed by echocardiography using the traditional (excluding trabeculae) and recommended approach (including trabeculae). The patients were randomised to a derivation (n = 60) or a test group (n = 60). EDVI (traditional/recommended) to rule in (>99/118 ml/m²) and rule out severe AR (≤75/87 ml/m²) were identified using ROC analyses in the derivation group. The corresponding thresholds for EDFV were >17 cm/s and ≤10 cm/s. In the test group, the positive/negative likelihood ratios to rule in/rule out severe AR using EDVI were 10.0/0.14 (traditional), 6.2/0.11 (recommended), and using EDFV were 10.2/0.08. To rule in and rule out severe AR using derived cut-off values instead of >2 SD reduced the false positives by 92%, whereas using EDFV ≤10 cm/s instead of ≤20 cm/s reduced the false negatives by 94%. In conclusion, EDVI and EDFV as quantitative parameters are useful to rule in or rule out severe chronic AR. Importantly, other causes of LV enlargement have to be considered.

Clinical Situations Associated with Inappropriately Large Regurgitant Volumes in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method in Patients with Chordae Rupture

BACKGROUND

Regurgitant volume (RVol) calculated using the proximal flow convergence method (proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]) has been accepted as a key quantitative parameter for the diagnosis of and clinical decision-making with regard to severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, a recent prospective study showed a significant overestimation of RVol by the echocardiographic PISA method compared with the MR volume measured using magnetic resonance imaging. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of overestimation of RVol by the PISA method and the clinical conditions that require a different quantitative method to correct the overestimation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 166 consecutive patients with degenerative MR and chordae rupture, in whom RVol was measured using both the PISA and two-dimensional Doppler volumetric methods. The volumetric method was used to measure total stroke volume using the two-dimensional Simpson biplane method, and forward stroke volume was measured using pulsed Doppler tracing at the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract. RVol by the volumetric method was calculated using total stroke volume - forward stroke volume. Severe MR was defined as an RVol >60 mL.

RESULTS

All patients had severe MR based on RVol by the PISA method, but 68 (41.1%) showed RVol by the volumetric method values of <60 mL, resulting in discordant results. The patients with discordant results were characterized by a higher prevalence of female sex, lower body surface area, smaller LV diastolic and systolic dimensions and volumes, smaller left atrial volume, smaller PISA angle, and lower frequency of flail leaflets (39.7% vs 62.2%, P = .004). Multivariate analysis revealed that LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and PISA angle were independent factors, with the best cutoff LVEDV and PISA angle being 173 mL and 103°, respectively. During follow-up (median, 3.4 years; interquartile range, 2.0-4.8 years), mitral valve repair and replacement were performed in 103 and six patients, respectively. The 2-year mitral valve surgery-free survival rate was higher in the discordant group (51.8% ± 0.06% vs 31.2% ± 0.05%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the patients with documented chordae rupture, the PISA method alone resulted in inappropriate overestimation of MR severity in a significant proportion of patients. Thus, an additive quantitative method is absolutely necessary in patients with a small LVEDV or narrow PISA angle.

The Average Pixel Intensity Method and Outcome of Mitral Regurgitation in Mitral Valve Prolapse

BACKGROUND

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a frequent consequence of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, the echocardiographic grading of MR is challenging, and the recommended grading parameters have several limitations. The authors developed a novel echocardiographic parameter to grade MR, the average pixel intensity (API) method, on the basis of pixel intensity analysis of the continuous-wave Doppler signal.

METHODS

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed prospectively in consecutive patients with MVP (N = 149). MR was quantitatively assessed using the API method, vena contracta width, effective regurgitant orifice area, and regurgitant volume. The primary clinical events were cardiovascular mortality, mitral valve surgery, percutaneous mitral intervention, and heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

The API method was feasible in 90% of all patients with MVP, which was significantly higher than vena contracta width, effective regurgitant orifice area, and regurgitant volume. During a median follow-up period of 17 months, 44 patients (32%) had major adverse cardiac events, and the majority of events occurred in the holosystolic MVP subgroup. The degree of MR severity by the API method was highly significant for the prediction of events. An API cutoff of 111 arbitrary units was defined as "severe" MR due to MVP, with overall superior sensitivity and specificity compared with cutoffs for established MR grading parameters. In patients who did not have major adverse cardiac events during the follow-up period (n = 92), no significant changes in measures of MR severity were found on follow-up echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The API method is predictive of clinical events and outcomes in MR due to MVP. Therefore, the API method may be considered for grading the severity of MR due to MVP in clinical practice.

Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the primary clinical imaging modality for the assessment of patients with isolated aortic regurgitation (AR) in whom TTE's linear left ventricular (LV) dimension is used to assess disease severity to guide aortic valve replacement (AVR), yet TTE is relatively limited with regards to its integrated semi-quantitative/qualitative approach. We therefore compared TTE and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of isolated AR and investigated each modality's ability to predict LV remodeling after AVR. AR severity grading by CMR and TTE were compared in 101 consecutive patients referred for CMR assessment of chronic AR. LV end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter measurements by both modalities were compared. Twenty-four patients subsequently had isolated AVR. The pre-AVR estimates of regurgitation severity by CMR and TTE were correlated with favorable post-AVR LV remodeling. AR severity grade agreement between CMR and TTE was moderate (ρ = 0.317, P = 0.001). TTE underestimated CMR LV end-diastolic and LV end-systolic diameter by 6.6 mm (P < 0.001, CI 5.8-7.7) and 5.9 mm (P < 0.001, CI 4.1-7.6), respectively. The correlation of post-AVR LV remodeling with CMR AR grade (ρ = 0.578, P = 0.004) and AR volumes (R = 0.664, P < 0.001) was stronger in comparison to TTE (ρ = 0.511, P = 0.011; R = 0.318, P = 0.2). In chronic AR, CMR provides more prognostic relevant information than TTE in assessing AR severity. CMR should be considered in the management of chronic AR patients being considered for AVR.