Routine Use of Contrast on Admission Transthoracic Echocardiography for Heart Failure Reduces the Rate of Repeat Echocardiography during Index Admission

Multi-societal expert consensus statement on the safe administration of ultrasound contrast agents

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) offers a safe, reliable imaging option to establish a clinical diagnosis across a variety of multidisciplinary settings. This Expert Consensus Statement serves to outline expert opinion on what constitutes appropriate supervision and the essential components of safe CEUS practice. The purpose of this document is to empower institutions to allow sonographers, along with other trained medical professionals, to administer UCAs at the point of care, consistent with the updated scope of practice documentation and within the broad parameters of an individual's training and licensure, while subject to appropriate supervision and meeting or exceeding minimum safety standards. This guidance was developed by the International Contrast Ultrasound Society and endorsed by the following organizations that represent ultrasound professionals: the British Society of Echocardiography, the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, the Brazilian College of Radiology, the Joint Review Committee for Diagnostic Medical Sonography, the Chinese Ultrasound Doctors Association, and the American Society of Neuroimaging. Additionally, this guidance document was affirmed or supported by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Association for Medical Ultrasound, and the Society for Vascular Ultrasound.

Contrast Echocardiography in Heart Failure: Update 2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of ultrasound-enhancing agents (contrast agents) has improved the accuracy and reproducibility of echocardiography. The review focuses on the currently approved and evolving indications for contrast echocardiography in patients with heart failure, specifically examining clinical studies conducted after the publication of the guidelines in 2017 and 2018.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current ASE/EACVI recommendations for contrast echocardiography are based on its accuracy and reproducibility in comparison to non-enhanced echocardiography or other imaging modalities like cardiac MRI. However, tissue characterization remains limited with contrast echocardiography. During the last few years, several studies have demonstrated the clinical impact of using contrast agents on the management of patients with heart failure. There is growing evidence on the benefit of using contrast echocardiography in critically ill patients where echocardiography without contrast agents is often suboptimal and other imaging methods are less feasible. There is no risk of worsening renal function after the administration of ultrasound-enhancing agents, and these agents can be administered even in patients with end-stage renal disease. Contrast echocardiography has become a valuable tool for first-line imaging of patients with heart failure across the spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure to critically ill patients.

Validation of administrative claims to identify ultrasound enhancing agent use

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) are an invaluable adjunct to stress and transthoracic echocardiography (STE) to improve left ventricular visualization. Despite multiple single center studies evaluating UEA use, investigation into the rates, sources of variation, and outcomes of UEA use on a national level in the United States (US) has been limited by lack of validation of UEA codes for claims analyses.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study, 2019-2022, using linked multicenter electronic medical record (EMR) data from > 30 health systems linked to all-payor claims data representing > 90% of the US population. Individuals receiving STE in both EMR and claims data on the same day during the study window were included. UEA receipt as identified by presence of a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) or National Drug Code (NDC) for UEA use within 1-day of the index STE event. We evaluated the performance of claims to identify UEA use, using EMR data as the gold standard, stratified by inpatient and outpatient status.

RESULTS

Amongst 54,525 individuals receiving STE in both EMR and claims data, 12,853 (23.6%) had a UEA claim in EMR, 10,461 (19.2%) had a UEA claim in claims, and 9140 (16.8%) had a UEA claim in both within the 1-day window. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive, and negative predictive values for UEA claims were 71.1%, 96.8%, 90.8%, 87.4%. and 91.6% respectively. However, amongst inpatients, the sensitivity of UEA claims was substantially lower (6.8%) compared to outpatients (79.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall accuracy of claims to identify UEA use was high, there was substantial under-capture of UEA use by claims amongst inpatients. These results call into question published rates of UEA use amongst inpatients in studies using administrative claims, and highlight ongoing need to improve inpatient coding for UEA use.

Machine learning derived echocardiographic image quality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: insights on the echo views of greatest image quality

We sought to determine the cardiac ultrasound view of greatest quality using a machine learning (ML) approach on a cohort of transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) with abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We utilize an ML model to determine the TTE view of highest quality when scanned by sonographers. A random sample of TTEs with reported LV dysfunction from 09/25/2017-01/15/2019 were downloaded from the regional database. Component video files were analyzed using ML models that jointly classified view and image quality. The model consisted of convolutional layers for extracting spatial features and Long Short-term Memory units to temporally aggregate the frame-wise spatial embeddings. We report the view-specific quality scores for each TTE. Pair-wise comparisons amongst views were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Of 1,145 TTEs analyzed by the ML model, 74.5% were from males and mean LV ejection fraction was 43.1 ± 9.9%. Maximum quality score was best for the apical 4 chamber (AP4) view (70.6 ± 13.9%, p<0.001 compared to all other views) and worst for the apical 2 chamber (AP2) view (60.4 ± 15.4%, p<0.001 for all views except parasternal short-axis view at mitral/papillary muscle level, PSAX M/PM). In TTEs scanned by professional sonographers, the view with greatest ML-derived quality was the AP4 view.

Impact of ultrasound enhancing agents on clinical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs), microbubbles which are composed of lipid or albumin shells containing high molecular weight gases with nonlinear acoustic properties in the ultrasound field, are important components of the diagnostic armamentarium in echocardiography. This review highlights the substantial value of UEAs in delineating endocardial border definition and influencing downstream decision-making in cardiovascular ultrasound.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this article, we review recent updates to the clinical applications of UEAs, special circumstances regarding use, the impact of use on downstream testing and cost-effectiveness, and recommended approaches for optimizing workflow in the echocardiography laboratory with UEAs.

SUMMARY

In multiple studies, UEAs have been identified as a useful tool in echocardiography, improving study accuracy and reader confidence, while reducing downstream testing and procedures and resulting in significant changes in clinical management. Despite their proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness, recent studies have suggested utilization remains low, in part due to perceived concerns and workflow issues that impair uptake. With an increasingly broader list of indications for echocardiography, UEAs will continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases.