The dynamic neuroendocrine response to critical illness

A review of the role of testosterone in the care of the critically ill patient

Background

Testosterone is an anabolic and androgenic steroid hormone therapeutically used to produce male sex characteristics. It has also been shown to have a modulating effect on proinflammatory biomarkers. Critical illness is characterised by a proinflammatory and catabolic state and is accompanied by altered testosterone production, which may persist into the recovery phase. Testosterone may, therefore be a potential therapeutic option in critical illness. This paper reviews normal testosterone physiology, and the changes seen during critical illness and systematically reviews testosterone therapy during both the acute and chronic phases of critical illness.

Contribution of the study

This article explains the pathophysiology of testosterone during critical illness and explores the therapeutic value of testosterone in the management of critically ill patients.

The role of hormones in sepsis: an integrated overview with a focus on mitochondrial and immune cell dysfunction

Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection that results in life-threatening organ dysfunction. Virtually every body system can be affected by this syndrome to greater or lesser extents. Gene transcription and downstream pathways are either up- or downregulated, albeit with considerable fluctuation over the course of the patient's illness. This multi-system complexity contributes to a pathophysiology that remains to be fully elucidated. Consequentially, little progress has been made to date in developing new outcome-improving therapeutics. Endocrine alterations are well characterised in sepsis with variations in circulating blood levels and/or receptor resistance. However, little attention has been paid to an integrated view of how these hormonal changes impact upon the development of organ dysfunction and recovery. Here, we present a narrative review describing the impact of the altered endocrine system on mitochondrial dysfunction and immune suppression, two interlinked and key aspects of sepsis pathophysiology.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Basic/Translational Science Research Priorities

Objectives:

Expound upon priorities for basic/translational science identified in a recent paper by a group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Data Sources:

Original paper, search of the literature.

Study Selection:

By several members of the original task force with specific expertise in basic/translational science.

Data Extraction:

None.

Data Synthesis:

None.

Conclusions:

In the first of a series of follow-up reports to the original paper, several members of the original task force with specific expertise provided a more in-depth analysis of the five identified priorities directly related to basic/translational science. This analysis expounds on what is known about the question and what was identified as priorities for ongoing research. It is hoped that this analysis will aid the development of future research initiatives.

Sepsis as a Pan-Endocrine Illness-Endocrine Disorders in Septic Patients

Sepsis is defined as "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection". One of the elements of dysregulated host response is an endocrine system disorder. Changes in its functioning in the course of sepsis affect almost all hormonal axes. In sepsis, a function disturbance of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been described, in the range of which the most important seems to be hypercortisolemia in the acute phase. Imbalance in the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis is also described. The most typical manifestation is a triiodothyronine concentration decrease and reverse triiodothyronine concentration increase. In the somatotropic axis, a change in the secretion pattern of growth hormone and peripheral resistance to this hormone has been described. In the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, the reduction in testosterone concentration in men and the stress-induced "hypothalamic amenorrhea" in women have been described. Catecholamine and β-adrenergic stimulation disorders have also been reported. Disorders in the endocrine system are part of the "dysregulated host response to infection". They may also affect other components of this dysregulated response, such as metabolism. Hormonal changes occurring in the course of sepsis require further research, not only in order to explore their potential significance in therapy, but also due to their promising prognostic value.

Microglial Activation Modulates Neuroendocrine Secretion During Experimental Sepsis

Sepsis promotes an inflammatory state in the central nervous system (CNS) that may cause autonomic, cognitive, and endocrine changes. Microglia, a resident immune cell of the CNS, is activated in several brain regions during sepsis, suggesting its participation in the central alterations observed in this disease. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of microglial activation in the neuroendocrine system functions during systemic inflammation. Wistar rats received an intracerebroventricular injection of the microglial activation inhibitor minocycline (100 μg/animal), shortly before sepsis induction by cecal ligation and puncture. At 6 and 24 h after surgery, hormonal parameters, central and peripheral inflammation, and markers of apoptosis and synaptic function in the hypothalamus were analyzed. The administration of minocycline decreased the production of inflammatory mediators and the expression of cell death markers, especially in the late phase of sepsis (24 h). With respect to the endocrine parameters, microglial inhibition caused a decrease in oxytocin and an increase in corticosterone and vasopressin plasma levels in the early phase of sepsis (6 h), while in the late phase, we observed decreased oxytocin and increased ACTH and corticosterone levels compared to septic animals that did not receive minocycline. Prolactin levels were not affected by minocycline administration. The results indicate that microglial activation differentially modulates the secretion of several hormones and that this process is associated with inflammatory mediators produced both centrally and peripherally.

Prevalence and risk of thyroid diseases in myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of thyroid diseases and the cumulative risk of thyroid diseases during a follow-up period after myasthenia gravis (MG) diagnosis compared with non-MG controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database linked to Registry of Catastrophic Illness database to identify patients with MG. The controls were composed of those who did not have MG and were matched with the MG patients by sex, age, and the index date. We recorded thyroid disease histories before and after the index date.

RESULTS

Our study included 5813 MG patients and 29 065 controls. The prevalence of thyroid diseases in the MG patients at diagnosis was 18.4%, which was nearly 3.9-fold greater than that in the control group. (Odds ratio [OR] 3.895, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 3.574-4.246) After excluding pre-existing thyroid diseases, the incidence of comorbid thyroid diseases was 8.7% in the MG patients and 4% in the control group. The MG patients had a 2.36-fold increased risk of developing thyroid diseases compared to the control group. (crude hazard ratio [HR] 2.360, 95% CI 2.095-2.659) The cumulative probabilities of developing thyroid diseases at 1, 5, and 10 years after the index date were 21.6%, 24.9%, and 28.7%, respectively, in the MG patients, while the cumulative probabilities were 6.5%, 8.8%, and 11.8%, respectively, in control group (log-rank test <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current population-based study showed a higher prevalence of pre-existing thyroid diseases and a higher cumulative probability of thyroid diseases during follow-up after MG diagnosis than in the general population.

The surviving sepsis campaign: basic/translational science research priorities

Objectives

Expound upon priorities for basic/translational science identified in a recent paper by a group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Data sources

Original paper, search of the literature.

Study selection

This study is selected by several members of the original task force with specific expertise in basic/translational science. Data extraction and data synthesis are not available.

Conclusions

In the first of a series of follow-up reports to the original paper, several members of the original task force with specific expertise provided a more in-depth analysis of the five identified priorities directly related to basic/translational science. This analysis expounds on what is known about the question and what was identified as priorities for ongoing research. It is hoped that this analysis will aid the development of future research initiatives.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock

OBJECTIVE

To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations.

METHODS

Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CCM/D636) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science.

RESULTS

The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: 1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; 2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; 3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; 4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; 5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and 6) what information identifies organ dysfunction?

CONCLUSIONS

While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock

Objective

To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock.

Design

A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations.

Methods

Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (ESM 1 - supplemental table 1) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science.

Results

The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: (1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; (2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; (3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; (4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; (5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and (6) what information identifies organ dysfunction?

Conclusions

While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endocrine and Metabolic Alterations in Sepsis and Implications for Treatment

Sepsis induces profound neuroendocrine and metabolic alterations. During the acute phase, the neuroendocrine changes are directed toward restoration of homeostasis, and also limit unnecessary energy consumption in the setting of restricted nutrient availability. Such changes are probably adaptive. In patients not recovering quickly, a prolonged critically ill phase may ensue, with different neuroendocrine changes, which may represent a maladaptive response. Whether stress hyperglycemia should be aggressively treated or tolerated remains a matter of debate. Until new evidence from randomized controlled trials becomes available, preventing severe hyperglycemia is recommended. Evidence supports withholding parenteral nutrition in the acute phase of sepsis.

Evaluation of endocrine function in children admitted to pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Although studied widely in adulthood, little is known about endocrinological disorders during critical illnesses in childhood. The aims of this study were to define the endocrinological changes in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to identify their effects on prognosis.

METHODS

Forty patients with a mean age of 5.1 years admitted to PICU were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were taken at admission and at 24 and 48 h to measure cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), prolactin, growth hormone (GH), GH binding protein (GHBP), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The severity of the patient's condition was assessed using pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) scores.

RESULTS

PRISM and PELOD scores were significantly higher in non-survivors. Cortisol, ACTH, prolactin, GH, GHBP, IGFBP-3 and IL-6 were not significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors. There was a negative correlation between baseline IGFBP-3 and PRISM scores. A positive correlation was seen between cortisol level at 24 h and PRISM score. On multivariate linear regression analysis, PRISM score was best explained by ACTH and cortisol at 24 h. A positive weak correlation was detected between IL-6 at 24 h and PELOD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference between survivors and non-survivors regarding the studied endocrine parameters, there were associations between cortisol, ACTH, IL-6 and IGFBP-3 and risk assessment scores, and, given that these scores correlated with mortality, these parameters might be useful as prognostic factors.

Stress response in critical illness

Sepsis brings about neuroendocrine dysfunction in children that differs significantly from that of adults and can thus be difficult to interpret and manage. Aggressive treatment of sepsis with appropriate and judicious use of antibiotics remains a top priority. Strict glycemic control in children has been associated with significant risk of hypoglycemia, which may independently contribute to morbidity and mortality. Timely initiation of hydrocortisone in persistently hypotensive children with fluid-refractory, catecholamine-resistant shock is controversial, but its use in children with suspected or proven adrenal insufficiency is suggested. Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities must be corrected. Treatment of thyroid dysfunction has been shown to be beneficial in certain specific populations but cannot be extrapolated to all septic patients with the current available data.

Interpreting Stress Responses during Routine Toxicity Studies

Stress often occurs during toxicity studies. The perception of sensory stimuli as stressful primarily results in catecholamine release and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis to increase serum glucocorticoid concentrations. Downstream effects of these neuroendocrine signals may include decreased total body weights or body weight gain; food consumption and activity; altered organ weights (e.g., thymus, spleen, adrenal); lymphocyte depletion in thymus and spleen; altered circulating leukocyte counts (e.g., increased neutrophils with decreased lymphocytes and eosinophils); and altered reproductive functions. Typically, only some of these findings occur in a given study. Stress responses should be interpreted as secondary (indirect) rather than primary (direct) test article–related findings. Determining whether effects are the result of stress requires a weight-of-evidence approach. The evaluation and interpretation of routinely collected data (standard in-life, clinical pathology, and anatomic pathology endpoints) are appropriate and generally sufficient to assess whether or not changes are secondary to stress. The impact of possible stress-induced effects on data interpretation can partially be mitigated by toxicity study designs that use appropriate control groups (e.g., cohorts treated with vehicle and subjected to the same procedures as those dosed with test article), housing that minimizes isolation and offers environmental enrichment, and experimental procedures that minimize stress and sampling and analytical bias.

This article is a comprehensive overview of the biological aspects of the stress response, beginning with a Summary (Section 1) and an Introduction (Section 2) that describes the historical and conventional methods used to characterize acute and chronic stress responses. These sections are followed by reviews of the primary systems and parameters that regulate and/or are influenced by stress, with an emphasis on parameters evaluated in toxicity studies: In-life Procedures (Section 3), Nervous System (Section 4), Endocrine System (Section 5), Reproductive System (Section 6), Clinical Pathology (Section 7), and Immune System (Section 8). The paper concludes (Section 9) with a brief discussion on Minimizing Stress-Related Effects (9.1.), and a final section explaining why Parameters routinely measured are appropriate for assessing the role of stress in toxicology studies (9.2.).

Altered serum stress neuropeptide levels in critically ill individuals and associations with lymphocyte populations

OBJECTIVE

Potential physiological correlates of stress and the role of stress neuropeptides, other than those of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, in critical illness have not been addressed. We investigated: (a) serum levels of stress neuropeptides (ACTH, substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), cortisol, prolactin) in critically ill individuals compared to matched controls, (b) associations with lymphocyte counts, (c) associations among stress neuropeptide levels, and (d) associations with perceived intensity of stress, critical illness severity and survival.

METHODS

Correlational design with repeated measures. Thirty-six critically ill patients were followed up for 14 days compared to 36 healthy matched controls. Stress was assessed by the ICUESS scale. Correlations, cross-sectional comparisons and multiple regression models were pursued.

RESULTS

For the first time, we report lower SP (Difference of means (DM) = 2928-3286 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and NPY (DM = 0.77-0.83 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) levels in critically ill individuals compared to controls. Cortisol levels were higher (DM = 140-173 ng/ml, p<0.0001) and lymphocyte population counts (p < 0.002) were lower in patients throughout the study. NPY levels associated with lymphocyte (r = 0.411-0.664, p < 0.04), T-lymphocyte (r = 0.403-0.781, p< 0.05), T-helper (r = 0.492-0.690, p < 0.03) and T-cytotoxic cell populations (r = 0.39-0.740, p < 0.03). On day 1, cortisol levels exhibited associations with lymphocyte (r = -0.452, p = 0.01), T-cell (r = -0.446, p = 0.02), T-helper (r = -0.428, p = 0.026) and T-cytotoxic cells ( r = -0.426, p = 0.027). ACTH levels associated with NK cell counts (r = 0.326-0.441, p < 0.05). Associations among stress neuropeptides levels were observed throughout (p < 0.05). ACTH levels associated with disease severity (r = 0.340-0.387, p < 0.005). A trend for an association between ACTH levels and intensity of stress was noted (r = 0.340, p = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

The significantly lowered NPY and SP levels and the associations with cortisol, ACTH and lymphocytes suggest that the role of these peptides in critical illness merit further investigation. Future studies need to address associations between these neuropeptides and functional immune cell responses and inflammatory markers in critical illness.

Overview of the endocrine response to critical illness: how to measure it and when to treat

The assessment and manipulation of the endocrine system in patients with critical illness is one of the most complex and controversial areas in endocrinology. Severe acute illness causes dramatic changes in most endocrine systems. This can lead to considerable difficulty in recognising pre-existing endocrine disorders in severely ill patients. Critical care itself might also induce types of endocrine dysfunction not seen outside the critical care unit. It is important to clarify whether or not such endocrine dysfunction occurs. Where it does occur it is also important to determine whether endocrine intervention is useful in improving outcome. There is also the issue of whether endocrine manipulation in critically ill patients without endocrine dysfunction could benefit from endocrine intervention, e.g. to improve haemodynamics or reverse a catabolic state. This review will discuss some of these contentious issues. It will highlight how endocrine assessment of a patient with critical illness differs from that in other types of patient. It will emphasise the added need to place the biochemical assessment and its interpretation in the context of the patients underlying condition.

Impaired postoperative hyperglycemic stress response associated with increased mortality in patients in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To describe the association of tight glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy and clinical outcome among patients in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit.

METHODS

All patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery and were admitted to the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit between September 13, 2007, and November 1, 2007, were enrolled. Clinical and metabolic data were prospectively collected. All patients received intensive insulin therapy using a nurse-driven dynamic protocol targeting blood glucose values of 80 to 110 mg/dL. Four stages of critical illness were defined as follows: acute critical illness (intensive care unit days 0-2), prolonged acute critical illness (intensive care unit 3 or more days), chronic critical illness (tracheotomy performed), and recovery (liberated from ventilator).

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled. Seventy-three (64%) recovered during acute critical illness, 26 (23%) recovered during prolonged acute critical illness, and 15 (13%) progressed to chronic critical illness. All 6 deaths were among patients in chronic critical illness. Admission blood glucose and average blood glucose values for the first 12 hours were lower in patients who developed chronic critical illness and died and were higher in patients who developed chronic critical illness and survived (P = .007 and P = .007, respectively). Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose <40 mg/dL) occurred once (0.03% of all measurements). Lower initial blood glucose values, which reflect an impaired stress response immediately after surgery, were associated with increased mortality, and a significant delay in achieving tight glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy was associated with prolonged intensive care unit course, but no increase in mortality.

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that acute postoperative hyperglycemia and its prompt correction with intensive insulin therapy are associated with favorable outcomes in patients in the cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit.

Hormonal status in protracted critical illness and in-hospital mortality

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between hormonal status and mortality in patients with protracted critical illness.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study in four medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs). ICU patients who regained consciousness after 7 days of mechanical ventilation were included. Plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and cortisol were measured on the first day patients were awake and cooperative (day 1). Mean blood glucose from admission to day 1 was calculated.

Results

We studied 102 patients: 65 men and 37 women (29 of the women were postmenopausal). Twenty-four patients (24%) died in the hospital. The IGF-1 levels were higher and the cortisol levels were lower in survivors. Mean blood glucose was lower in women who survived, and DHEA and DHEAS were higher in men who survived.

Conclusions

These results suggest that, on the basis of sex, some endocrine or metabolic markers measured in the postacute phase of critical illness might have a prognostic value.

Understanding, recognizing, and managing chronic critical illness syndrome

PURPOSE

No evidence-based guidelines exist for the care of patients with chronic critical illness syndrome (CCIS), a growing population of patients being cared for by nurse practitioners (NPs). The purpose of this article is to provide NPs with a beginning physiological framework, allostasis, to guide their understanding and management of patients with CCIS.

DATA SOURCES

Scientific publications, related clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CCIS are a distinct group of critically ill patients whose care needs are different from those of patients who are acutely critically ill. These patients demonstrate widespread tissue and organ damage. The widespread tissue and organ damage results in a syndrome of interrelated elements, which include neuroendocrine problems, severe malnutrition, wounds, infections, bone loss, polyneuropathy and myopathy, delirium and depression, and suffering.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In caring for patients with CCIS, NPs need to focus on treating the elements of the syndrome as a cohort of interrelated elements and on re-establishing normalcy for the patient.

Hyperglycaemia in critical illness is a risk factor for later development of type II diabetes mellitus

Hyperglycaemia caused by stress and inflammation is common during critical illness. We hypothesised that a latent glucose metabolism disturbance contributes to development of hyperglycaemia and that those patients have increased risk for diabetes. We included patients with sepsis, acute coronary syndrome and acute heart failure with no history of impaired glucose metabolism and divided them in the hyperglycaemia group (glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/l) and normoglycaemia group. Patients were followed for 5 years. Follow-up was completed for 115 patients in the normoglycaemia group, of which 4 (3.5%) developed type 2 diabetes. In the hyperglycaemia group 51 patients finished follow-up and 8 (15.7%) developed type 2 diabetes. Relative risk in 5-year period for patients with hyperglycaemia was 4.51 for development of type 2 diabetes. Patients with hyperglycaemia during critical illness who are not diagnosed with diabetes before or during the hospitalisation should be considered a population at increased risk for developing diabetes.

A prospective observational study of the relationship of critical illness associated hyperglycaemia in medical ICU patients and subsequent development of type 2 diabetes

Introduction

Critical illness is commonly complicated by hyperglycaemia caused by mediators of stress and inflammation. Severity of disease is the main risk factor for development of hyperglycaemia, but not all severely ill develop hyperglycemia and some do even in mild disease. We hypothesised that acute disease only exposes a latent disturbance of glucose metabolism which puts those patients at higher risk for developing diabetes.

Methods

Medical patients with no history of impaired glucose metabolism or other endocrine disorder admitted to an intensive care unit between July 1998 and June 2004 were considered for inclusion. Glucose was measured at least two times a day, and patients were divided into the hyperglycaemia group (glucose ≥7.8 mmol/l) and normoglycaemia group. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed within six weeks after discharge to disclose patients with unknown diabetes or pre-diabetes who were excluded. Patients treated with corticosteroids and those terminally ill were also excluded from the follow-up which lasted for a minimum of five years with annual oral glucose tolerance tests.

Results

A five-year follow-up was completed for 398 patients in the normoglycaemia group, of which 14 (3.5%) developed type 2 diabetes. In the hyperglycaemia group 193 patients finished follow-up and 33 (17.1%) developed type 2 diabetes. The relative risk for type 2 diabetes during five years after the acute illness was 5.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1 to 10.2).

Conclusions

Patients with hyperglycaemia during acute illness who are not diagnosed with diabetes before or during the hospitalization should be considered a population at increased risk for developing diabetes. They should, therefore, be followed-up, in order to be timely diagnosed and treated.

Alterations in adipose tissue during critical illness: An adaptive and protective response?

RATIONALE

Critical illness is characterized by lean tissue wasting, whereas adipose tissue is preserved. Overweight and obese critically ill patients may have a lower risk of death than lean patients, suggestive of a protective role for adipose tissue during illness.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether adipose tissue could protectively respond to critical illness by storing potentially toxic metabolites, such as excess circulating glucose and triglycerides.

METHODS

We studied adipose tissue morphology and metabolic activity markers in postmortem biopsies of 61 critically ill patients and 20 matched control subjects. Adipose morphology was also studied in in vivo biopsies of 27 patients and in a rabbit model of critical illness (n = 22).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Adipose tissue from critically ill patients revealed a higher number and a smaller size of adipocytes and increased preadipocyte marker levels as compared with control subjects. Virtually all adipose biopsies from critically ill patients displayed positive macrophage staining. The animal model demonstrated similar changes. Glucose transporter levels and glucose content were increased. Glucokinase expression was up-regulated, whereas glycogen and glucose-6-phosphate levels were low. Acetyl CoA carboxylase protein and fatty acid synthase activity were increased. Hormone-sensitive lipase activity was not altered, whereas lipoprotein lipase activity was increased. A substantially increased AMP-activated protein kinase activity may play a crucial role.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmortem adipose tissue biopsies from critically ill patients displayed a larger number of small adipocytes in response to critical illness, revealing an increased ability to take up circulating glucose and triglycerides. Similar morphologic changes were present in vivo. Such changes may render adipose tissue biologically active as a functional storage depot for potentially toxic metabolites, thereby contributing to survival.

Intensive metabolic support: evolution and revolution

OBJECTIVE

To describe a new aspect of critical care termed intensive metabolic support.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature published between 1995 and 2008 for studies regarding the metabolic stages of critical illness, intensive insulin treatment, and intensive metabolic support in the intensive care unit, and we summarize the clinical data.

RESULTS

Intensive metabolic support is a 3-component model involving metabolic control and intensive insulin therapy, early nutrition support, and nutritional pharmacology aimed at preventing allostatic overload and the development of chronic critical illness. To improve clinical outcome and prevent mortality, intensive metabolic support should start on arrival to the intensive care unit and should end only when patients are in the recovery phase of their illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive metabolic support should be an essential part of the daily treatment strategy in critical care medicine. This will involve a newfound and extensive collaboration between the endocrinologist and the intensivist. We call for well-designed future studies involving implementation of this protocol to decrease the burden of chronic critical illness.

[Adrenal insufficiency in cirrhosis]

Cortisol is a pluripotent hormone that is vital in the host adaptation to stress. It is essential to maintain the normal vascular tone, endothelial integrity and vascular permeability. Consequently, the failure of an appropriate adrenal response in the setting of critical illness, alteration known as relative adrenal insufficiency, may have important clinical consequences. The diagnosis of this entity is not possible on clinical grounds and relies on the measurement of plasma cortisol levels prior and after adrenal stimulation with synthetic corticotrophin. Several studies performed in the general population have shown that relative adrenal insufficiency contributes to vascular hyporesponsiveness in septic shock and increases mortality. However, contradictory data exist regarding the effects of hydrocortisone administration in these patients. Moreover, recent studies indicate that relative adrenal insufficiency is very frequent in patients with advanced cirrhosis and septic shock and in fulminant hepatic failure. This chapter summarizes the main aspects of the physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment of this entity in patients with acute or chronic liver disease.

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma as a cause of hypopituitarism: gradual and late reversal of hypopituitarism after long-term remission of lymphoma with immunochemotherapy

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVL) is a rare generally fatal disease characterized by massive proliferation of lymphoid cells within the small and medium blood vessels. Hypopituitarism has been reported only in a few fatal cases. We describe the clinical course of hypopituitarism as a complication of IVL, successfully treated with immunochemotherapy (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone-CHOP) plus Rituximab anti-CD20 humanized antibody). Before immunochemotherapy, basal hormonal analysis and dynamic test for pituitary function were performed in a 67-year-old female with IVL. Endocrinological evaluation of the pituitary function was repeated after complete hematological remission and during the 2 years of follow-up. Multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies were diagnosed before therapy for IVL. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland showed partially empty sella. The patient was replaced with thyroxine 50 microg/day and prednisone 5 mg/day between the cycles of chemotherapy. After complete hematological remission (6 months after initial diagnosis) reversal of cortisol and gonadotropin deficiency occurred. After 18 months of hematological remission there was further improvement in growth hormone (GH) response to provocative testings (partial GH deficiency), with normalization of somatotropic and thyreotropic axis after 2 years of follow-up. This is the first case of IVL complicated with hypopituitarism, treated with immunochemotherapy which resulted in complete hematological remission and gradual and late reversal of hypopituitarism.

Systemic illness

Systemic illnesses are associated with alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-peripheral hormone axes, which represent part of the adaptive response to stressful events and may be influenced by type and severity of illness and/or pharmacological therapy. The pituitary gland responds to an acute stressful event with two secretory patterns: adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) levels increase, while luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and thyrotropin (TSH) levels may either decrease or remain unchanged, associated with a decreased activity of their target organ. In protracted critical illness, there is a uniformly reduced pulsatile secretion of ACTH, TSH, LH, PRL and GH, causing a reduction in serum levels of the respective target-hormones. These adaptations are initially protective; however, if inadequate or excessive they may be dangerous and may contribute to the high morbidity and mortality risk of these patients. There is no consensus regarding the type of approach, as well as the criteria to use to define pituitary axis function in critically ill patients. We here provide a critical approach to pituitary axis evaluation during systemic illness.