Increased risk of colon cancer after acute appendicitis: a nationwide, population-based study

The association of appendectomy with prognosis and tumor-associated macrophages in patients with colorectal cancer

The vermiform appendix plays an important role in colorectal immunity and the homeostasis of the gut microbiome. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of prior appendectomy for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study revealed that prior appendectomy is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients with CRC, based on a multicentral CRC cohort. We further demonstrated that appendectomy induced a poor prognosis of CRC through the depletion of M1 macrophage cells in AOM-induced mice, which was confirmed in age-, sex-, and location-matched patients' cohorts and orthotopic model models with the CT26 cell line. Poor responses to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were detected in patients with CRC with appendectomy, and cetuximab is an effective treatment for patients with appendectomy-associated colorectal cancer (APD-CRC) to improve their prognosis. Our study will provide a reference for developing treatment plans for a considerable number of patients with APD-CRC, which is of great clinical significance.

Risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma after an appendectomy: results from three large prospective cohort studies and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The relationship between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer risk remains unclear, and no study has examined its association with colorectal adenoma.

METHODS

We used data from three prospective cohorts: Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study (NHS), and NHSII. Appendectomy history was self-reported at baseline. Colorectal cancer risk was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models among 224,109 participants followed up to 32 years. Colorectal adenoma risk was evaluated among 157,490 participants with at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during follow-up with logistic regression models accounting for repeated observations. We also performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies that examined association between appendectomy and colorectal cancer risk.

RESULTS

We documented 3,384 colorectal cancers, 13,006 conventional adenomas, and 11,519 serrated polyps during the follow-up period. Compared to participants without appendectomy, those who reported appendectomy history were not at higher risk of colorectal (HR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.00]), colon (0.92 [0.83-1.01]), or rectal (0.85 [0.70-1.03]) cancer. Similarly, appendectomy history was not associated with higher risk of conventional adenoma (OR [95% CI], 1.00 [0.97-1.02]), serrated polyp (0.97 [0.94-1.00]), or high-risk adenoma (0.96 [0.92-1.01]). The meta-analysis showed appendectomy was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer within a short time after the procedure (1.68 [1.01-2.81]), while the long-term risk was slightly inverse (0.94 [0.90-0.97]).

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of an association between appendectomy history and long-term risk of colorectal cancer or its precursors. The observed higher risk of colorectal cancer right after appendectomy in the first few years is likely due to reverse causation.

Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase colorectal cancer risk: evidence from Mendelian randomization

Background

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most prevalent acute abdominal diseases and appendectomy is the definitive treatment of appendicitis. However, whether appendicitis and appendectomy cause colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. The results of observational studies are contradictory, but randomized controlled trials (RCT) cannot be conducted.

Methods

Data of appendectomy, AA, and CRC were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS project. We selected several Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics for CRC: statistics for colon cancer (CC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and Neale lab, respectively; statistics for rectum cancer (RC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and FinnGen, respectively; statistics for CRC were provided by Sakaue S et al. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to evaluate the causal relationships between exposure and outcomes. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the most important analysis method. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the results of IVW to increase the reliability and sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the robustness of the results.

Results

According to the results of IVW, appendectomy did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU (OR:1.009, 95%CI:0.984-1.035, P=0.494), Neale lab (OR:1.016, 95%CI:0.993-1.040, P=0.174); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:0.994, 95%CI:0.974-1.014, P=0.538), FinnGen(OR:2.791, 95%CI:0.013-580.763, P=0.706); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S(OR:1.382, 95%CI:0.301-6.352, P=0.678). Appendicitis did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.001, P=0.641), Neale lab(OR:1.000, 95%CI:1.000-1.001, P=0.319); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.000, P=0.361), FinnGen(OR:0.903, 95%CI:0.737-1.105, P=0.321); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S (OR:1.018, 95%CI:0.950-1.091, P=0.609). The results of Meta-analysis also showed appendectomy (P=0.459) and appendicitis (P=0.999) did not increase the risk of CRC.

Conclusions

Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase the risk of colorectal cancer. More clinical trials are needed in the future to verify the causal relationships.

Beyond a vestigial organ: effects of the appendix on gut microbiome and colorectal cancer

The role of appendectomy in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a recent topic of contention. Given that appendectomy remains one of the most commonly performed operations and a first-line management strategy of acute appendicitis, it is inherently crucial to elucidate the association between prior appendectomy and subsequent development of CRC, as there may be long-term health repercussions. In this review, we summarize the data behind the relationship of CRC in post-appendectomy patients, discuss the role of the microbiome in relation to appendectomy and CRC pathogenesis, and provide an appraisal of our current understanding of the function of the appendix. We seek to piece together the current landscape surrounding the microbiome and immunological changes in the colon post-appendectomy and suggest a direction for future research involving molecular, transcriptomic, and immunologic analysis to complement our current understanding of the alterations in gut microbiome.

Elevated Colon Cancer Rates Linked to Prior Appendicitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Data from German General Practices

Background/Objective: The association between appendicitis and colon cancer is not yet fully understood. Previous studies have shown contradictory results. Currently, no population-based data from Germany are available with regard to the incidence of colon cancer following appendicitis. This study investigated the association between appendicitis and the incidence of colon cancer in Germany. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the incidence of colon cancer was compared for patients with appendicitis and patients without appendicitis, matched for age, sex, index year, average annual consultation frequency, and comorbidity. The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between appendicitis and the incidence of colon cancer. The evaluation was carried out using logistic regression analyses. Results: The study included 49,790 people with and without appendicitis, with a median age of 41 years. During a follow-up period of up to 15 years, 1.04% of cases with appendicitis and 0.60% of cases without appendicitis were newly diagnosed with colon cancer, with some 36.4% of colon cancer cases diagnosed within the first six months after appendicitis. Regression analyses revealed a significant association between appendicitis and colon cancer, particularly in men and in the age groups 41-50 (HR: 10.30; 95% CI: 1.03-43.82) and 18-30 years (HR: 8.17; 95% CI: 1.03-64.58). Conclusions: The present retrospective cohort study suggests an association between appendicitis and the incidence of colon cancer in Germany. Based on our results, we recommend offering a colonoscopy or at least a stool test within 12 months after appendicitis, especially for 18-50-year-olds and >60-year-olds in good general health.

Perforated appendicitis with endosalpingiosis

Endosalpingiosis a condition of ectopic glandular epithelium diagnosed histologically, most commonly on pelvic and abdominal peritoneum, that can be associated with abdominal pain mimicking appendicitis. There is evidence emerging that endosalpingiosis may be associated with serous ovarian malignancies. Here we describe a case of perforated appendicitis with concurrent endosalpingiosis. Further research is required to better elucidate the association between endosalpingiosis and malignancy, and the implications of a concurrent presentation with a hollow viscus perforation.

Nanoparticles drug delivery for 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in photodynamic therapy (PDT) for multiple cancer treatment: a critical review on biosynthesis, detection, and therapeutic applications

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising cancer treatment that kills cancer cells selectively by stimulating reactive oxygen species generation with photosensitizers exposed to specific light wavelengths. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a widely used photosensitizer. However, its limited tumour penetration and targeting reduce its therapeutic efficacy. Scholars have investigated nano-delivery techniques to improve 5-ALA administration and efficacy in PDT. This review summarises recent advances in biological host biosynthetic pathways and regulatory mechanisms for 5-ALA production. The review also highlights the potential therapeutic efficacy of various 5-ALA nano-delivery modalities, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, and gels, in treating various cancers. Although promising, 5-ALA nano-delivery methods face challenges that could impair targeting and efficacy. To determine their safety and biocompatibility, extensive preclinical and clinical studies are required. This study highlights the potential of 5-ALA-NDSs to improve PDT for cancer treatment, as well as the need for additional research to overcome barriers and improve medical outcomes.