Clinician preferences on treatment of smoldering myeloma: a cross-sectional survey

Evaluating early intervention in smoldering myeloma clinical trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), carries a variable risk of progression to MM. There is little consensus on the efficacy or optimal timing of treatment in SMM. We systematically reviewed the landscape of all clinical trials in SMM. We compared the efficacy of treatment regimens studied in SMM to results from these regimens when used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), to determine whether the data suggest deeper responses in SMM versus NDMM.

METHODS

All prospective interventional clinical trials for SMM, including published studies, meeting abstracts, and unpublished trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 1, 2023, were identified. Trial-related variables were captured, including treatment strategy and efficacy results. Relevant clinical endpoints were defined as overall survival (OS) and quality of life.

RESULTS

Among 45 SMM trials identified, 38 (84.4%) assessed active myeloma drugs, while 7 (15.6%) studied bone-modifying agents alone. Of 18 randomized trials in SMM, only one (5.6%) had a primary endpoint of OS; the most common primary endpoint was progression-free survival (n = 7, 38.9%). Among 32 SMM trials with available results, 9 (28.1%) met their prespecified primary endpoint, of which 5 were single-arm studies. Six treatment regimens were tested in both SMM and NDMM; 5 regimens yielded a lower rate of very good partial response rate or better (≥VGPR) in SMM compared to the corresponding NDMM trial (32% vs 63%, 43% vs 53%, 40% vs 63%, 86% vs 89%, 92% vs 95%, and 94% vs 87%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review of all prospective interventional clinical trials in SMM, we found significant variability in trial design, including randomization status, primary endpoints, and types of intervention used. Despite the statistical limitations, comparison of treatment regimens revealed no compelling evidence that the treatment is more effective when introduced early in SMM compared to NDMM.

Is It Possible to Predict Tumor Progression Through Genomic Characterization of Monoclonal Gammopathy and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma?

The study of monoclonal serum proteins has led to the generation of two major theories: one proposing that individuals who had monoclonal proteins without any symptoms or evidence of end-organ damage have a benign condition, the other one suggesting that some individuals with asymptomatic monoclonal proteins may progress to multiple myeloma and thus are affected by a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Longitudinal studies of subjects with MGUS have supported the second theory. Subsequent studies have characterized and defined the existence of another precursor of multiple myeloma, smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), intermediate between MGUS and multiple myeloma. Primary molecular events, chromosome translocations, and chromosome number alterations resulting in hyperploidy, required for multiple myeloma development, are already observed in myeloma precursors. MGUS and SMM are heterogeneous conditions with the presence of tumors with distinct pathogenic phenotypes and clinical outcomes. The identification of MGUS and SMM patients with a molecularly defined high risk of progression to MM offers the unique opportunity of early intervention with a therapeutic approach on a low tumor burden.

Diagnosis and management of smouldering myeloma: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper

Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based plasma cell tumour that develops from asymptomatic pre-cursor conditions smouldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and all are characterised by the presence of a monoclonal protein in the blood. Diagnosis and distinction between these conditions is based on blood tests, the bone marrow biopsy and cross sectional imaging. There are various risk stratification models that group patients with smouldering myeloma into risk groups based on risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Management is mainly observational for patients with smouldering myeloma although clinical trials for high-risk disease may be available. Restaging is required if evidence for progression.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Diagnosis and Management of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Monoclonal proteins are common, with a prevalence in the United States around 5% and the incidence increases with age. Although most patients are asymptomatic, the vast majority of cases are caused by a clonal plasma cell disorder. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions with variable risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). In recent years, significant progress has been made to better understand the factors that lead to the development of symptoms and progression to myeloma. In this review, we summarize the current diagnosis treatment guidelines for MGUS and SMM and highlight recent advances that underscore a shifting paradigm in the evaluation and management of plasma cell precursor conditions.